Slashdot Mirror


Comcast Unveils $5-a-Month Streaming Service Xfinity Flex (cnet.com)

Comcast announced a $5-a-month streaming video service Thursday called Xfinity Flex, an offering that aggregates on-demand video from your subscriptions like Netflix Amazon Prime Video and HBO, as well as offering free ad-supported shows to watch and options to rent and buy programming. From a report: It essentially replicates some of the features of a cable service but delivers over the internet rather than... well, cable. But it won't have live channels or DVR, and it won't let you watch a live-TV streaming service like YouTube TV or Sling TV, keeping Flex squarely in the realm of on-demand viewing that's less threatening to Comcast's traditional -- and lucrative -- cable TV packages. Instead, Flex will have built-in ways to upgrade to live TV from Comcast. Xfinity Flex comes with a 4K and HDR-ready wireless set-top box with an X1 voice remote, Engadget adds. It's scheduled to launch March 26th, and will be available to customers who have Comcast internet.

30 of 59 comments (clear)

  1. It's not "$5 a month". by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Quoting from the story: "Xfinity Flex will run $5 a month on top of a Comcast customer's cost for internet service."

    1. Re: It's not "$5 a month". by grif_91 · · Score: 1

      I swear to God man, it really seems like you copy-pasted this right off of the website.

  2. $5 to "Aggregate" my other 3rd party services? LOL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Hahaha Uhm no. $5 to "aggregate" my streaming services? LOL. I "aggregated" them by putting all those apps into the same folder on my iPad. There, saved $5/mo. Wow, Idiots.

  3. Yeah fuck that by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Fuck Comcast.

    1. Re:Yeah fuck that by fahrbot-bot · · Score: 3, Informative

      Fuck Comcast.

      That's an extra $10/month.

      --
      It must have been something you assimilated. . . .
  4. Probably not just $5. by mattb47 · · Score: 2

    I'd bet they charge $8/month for that streaming box, and that you can only rent it, not buy it.

    Still -- maybe? I have Comcast for internet only. It might work for me.

    1. Re:Probably not just $5. by pslytely+psycho · · Score: 1

      My hope is they touch off a price war among the streaming services. There are way too many already, and it seems a new one every week.*

      *Likely an exaggeration, but the field needs to be culled a bit, and their content redistributed to the survivors. Although, unfortunately the sole survivor is likely to be Disney.

      --
      Donald Trump, on a crusade to make Nixon look respectable
  5. Bundle? by jythie · · Score: 1

    I wonder how they convince Amazon, Netflix, and HBO to allow them to stream their content rather than having customers go to their individual apps/sites/boxes/whatever.

    Still, I could see services like this having a place. One of the things that can be frustrating and limiting about these various streaming services is the content customers want is often spread out among multiple services and we have really gotten used to the idea of going to one source for each type of product.

    1. Re:Bundle? by Local+ID10T · · Score: 1

      I wonder how they convince Amazon, Netflix, and HBO to allow them to stream their content rather than having customers go to their individual apps/sites/boxes/whatever.

      This part isn't new. They already have most of the various streaming apps available under the "apps" menu on the xfinity cable tv box. They also integrate most subscribed services (Amazon, Netflix, HBO, Showtime, etc) into the "on demand" (filter : "Free to Me") heading as a single alphabetical listing of shows/movies to watch. If the movie is available from more than one source, it will give you the choice of which source you want to watch from.

      It works surprisingly well as an integrated source.

      In my area, the TV + Internet bundle is $20/mo less than the Internet only service (for the same bandwidth) and they waive the cap -which is a big deal for us. They will have to change their pricing structure (again) to make this device/service appealing.

      --
      "You want to know how to help your kids? Leave them the fuck alone." -George Carlin
  6. What value does it really have though by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    I have Comcast for internet only. It might work for me.

    The idea of a streaming service aggregator is a little mystifying to me, since I just run separate streaming apps and that works really well.

    Maybe if the aggregator UI was better than the stream apps UI? I can't see that being true for Netflix though (maybe for Prime which has a terrible UI).

    For searching, I can already search for content across multiple streaming apps on an AppleTV so it doesn't help any there...

    Maybe the Comcast specific aggregator would offer some kind of quality boost or improved level of performance?

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  7. I actually like the idea by sunking2 · · Score: 2

    I wouldn't pay an extra $5 for it though. I thought this was initially what the xbox one guide was supposed to be but it never seemed to happen. Would love it if this was enough to push them to finally implement it.

  8. Also known as Chromecast or Roku by Doogie+Howser · · Score: 2

    Basically, Comcast will rent you a Roku box? Brilliant...

    1. Re:Also known as Chromecast or Roku by roc97007 · · Score: 1

      Basically, Comcast will rent you a Roku box? Brilliant...

      It *is* brilliant. Because some people *will* fall for it.

      --
      Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
  9. I prefer the old classic by IWantMoreSpamPlease · · Score: 2

    'torrenting...still free

    (/h or /s, you decide)

    --
    So rise up, all ye lost ones, as one, we'll claw the clouds.
  10. Re:$5 to "Aggregate" my other 3rd party services? by lactose99 · · Score: 3, Informative

    Roku does this for free anyway (well, free monthly, once you get one of their inexpensive streaming boxes)

    --
    Fully licensed blockchain psychiatrist
  11. So this is why.... by 3seas · · Score: 1

    They recently jumped up my internet connection costs %5 without telling me anything,,, but no set-top box.

  12. Anti-trust? by FilmedInNoir · · Score: 1

    That sounds like an anti-trust lawsuit waiting to happen because I see them crippling access to say Netflix unless you pay the $5 to them.
    Anti-net neutrality laws opened the door for that sort of abuse so it might not even be anti-trust.

    --
    Sig. Sig. Sputnik
  13. Your'e talking about comcast by Crashmarik · · Score: 1

    Their software is the worst flash based crap anyone has ever seen.

    It's surprising anti virus software doesn't try and remove it.

  14. $5/mo to RENT a streaming box + remote by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 3, Insightful

    $5/mo to RENT a streaming box + remote how long before it's $7-$10/mo and if you don't return the box you will be billed $250.

    1. Re:$5/mo to RENT a streaming box + remote by qubezz · · Score: 1

      They upped the rental of a $30 cable modem to $13 a month.

  15. Better to run a VPN server by timholman · · Score: 2

    Back when I had service from Comcast (before switching to AT&T Fiber and DirecTV Now), customers were allowed to stream channels to a mobile device within your home network, but not outside of it.

    I quickly solved that problem by installing a VPN server on my home network and using that to watch TV while on the road. No doubt many others did the same. This $5 / month fee is effectively a surcharge by Comcast for the computer illiterate.

  16. nursing homes are a gold mine for cable lockin by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 1

    nursing homes are a gold mine for cable locking and they can use this to lock out others in them.

  17. Re:$5 to "Aggregate" my other 3rd party services? by FritzTheCat1030 · · Score: 1

    Hahaha Uhm no. $5 to "aggregate" my streaming services? LOL. I "aggregated" them by putting all those apps into the same folder on my iPad. There, saved $5/mo. Wow, Idiots.

    Yeah, but if you don't pay it they'll throttle your streaming services so they are unusable. Maybe not at first...but soon.

  18. Free? by surfdaddy · · Score: 1

    So they have included "free ad-supported shows" for $5/month? Hmmmm.....

  19. $5 a month for the privilege of a Roku-type device by SB5407 · · Score: 1

    A never ending $5 a month for the privilege of leasing the equivalent of a Roku or Apple TV. This, when Rokus are $30-$40 to own. LOL, nope.

  20. Yay! Streaming services for my streaming services! by nwaack · · Score: 1

    Wow, just wow.

  21. It's a trap! by roc97007 · · Score: 1

    As usual, Comcast wants you to rent something you could buy cheap. For a low, low introductory price which will inevitably increase as time goes on. In a year you will have spent enough to buy the hardware at least twice.

    The hardware is intentionally feature-limited to avoid competing with Comcast legacy services.

    As a bonus, you get to call Comcast technical support if there's a problem.

    And, if at some later time you come to your senses, you'll discover just how difficult it is to return the hardware and stop Comcast from charging your credit card.

    Seriously, just another example of the cable industry trying to apply an obsolete business model to current times. Cable is dead. Streaming is not like cable, unless we (the consumers) let it be. Let's not do that, ok?

    --
    Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
  22. Re:$5 a month for the privilege of a Roku-type dev by roc97007 · · Score: 1

    A feature limited (from TFA) Roku or Apple TV.

    --
    Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
  23. Re:You are all missing the point here... by roc97007 · · Score: 1

    Good point, and a REALLY good reason not to have internet from Comcast.

    --
    Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
  24. Don't need the set-top box by Cajun+Hell · · Score: 1

    I wouldn't need their set-top box, just publish the APIs and developers can all work it into their media players. If it requires their box, then it's still "just cable."

    --
    "Believe me!" -- Donald Trump