Slashdot Mirror


Intel Says It Will Stop Developing Compute Cards

Intel will not develop new Compute Cards, the company said this week. From a report: Compute Cards were Intel's vision of modular computing that would allow customers to continually update point of sale systems, all-in-one desktops, laptops and other devices. Pull out one card, replace it with another, and you have a new CPU, plus RAM and storage. "We continue to believe modular computing is a market where there are many opportunities for innovation," an Intel spokesperson told Tom's Hardware. "However, as we look at the best way to address this opportunity, we've made the decision that we will not develop new Compute Card products moving forward. We will continue to sell and support the current Compute Card products through 2019 to ensure our customers receive the support they need with their current solutions, and we are thankful for their partnership on this change."

11 of 42 comments (clear)

  1. because they SUCKED! by SirAstral · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I tried two different version of these and they sucked bad.

    Here are some examples of problems.
    The biggest problem is the terrible implementation. Nothing was planned for expansion. The USB ports were limited though understandble, but often had a weird problem. The devices emitted an EMI field that prevented many wireless keyboards and mice from working. Had to get an extension usb cable or dongle to bring them far enough away from the device to function.
    No flexible cabling to plug them into devices with limited profiles for their HDMI connectors and really the same for the other ports. They really should have broken out ports to allow for far more flexibility than they did. The NUC was not as bad as the Sticks because they had more surface area to work with but still found many problems with them.

    Their designs just kept them down and prevented them from being as useful as they could have been.

    1. Re:because they SUCKED! by EvilSS · · Score: 4, Informative

      Are you confusing these for the compute sticks with the compute cards? The cards are different. They are basically a cartridge you plugged into a POS system, laptop, or all-in-one, or a little dock using their NexDock interface. https://www.intel.com/content/www/us/en/products/boards-kits/compute-card.html

      --
      I browse on +1 so AC's need not respond, I won't see it.
    2. Re: because they SUCKED! by SirAstral · · Score: 2, Funny

      but still not as good as your dad does. You could probably learn a "trick" or two from him!

    3. Re: because they SUCKED! by SirAstral · · Score: 3, Funny

      Was that YOUR dad? cause judging by the resulting child you are probably ugly as sin too, if feel sorry for ya! I don't blame you for posting as AC now!

  2. I don't get this marketing double-speak by IWantMoreSpamPlease · · Score: 2

    On one side of their mouth they say "We continue to believe modular computing is a market where there are many opportunities for innovation." while the other side says they will no longer develop new Compute Cards."

    So, which is it Intel?
    Why not just be honest and say "We couldn't compete in this market/make enough money, so we're leaving it."

    I'd respect you more if you were honest.

    --
    So rise up, all ye lost ones, as one, we'll claw the clouds.
    1. Re:I don't get this marketing double-speak by mysidia · · Score: 2

      "We continue to believe modular computing is a market where there are many opportunities for innovation." while the other side says they will no longer develop new Compute Cards."
       
      So, which is it Intel?

      I'm not sure.... but Intel did just screw over any businesses who bought into the hardware that uses compute cards for investment protection with the expectation that the compute card model would basically guarantee future upgradeability (The major promise of modular computing!).

      Can't trust that promise when its controlled by one vendor (Intel), because Intel just discontinued any possibility of future upgrades to that hardware, and now the people who bought that hardware are screwed, since upgrading will now require a complete forklift.

      After getting screwed like that; businesses should not be so trusting of Intel's next "modular" solution either.

    2. Re:I don't get this marketing double-speak by ElizabethGreene · · Score: 2

      The market segment in question is minuscule.

      No, it isn't. Embedded systems manufacturers, specifically POS and self-checkout system makers, would love to have a click-in forward-compatible compute subsystem. They didn't adopt Intel's platform because Intel has a long history of discontinuing embedded systems platforms with very little warning and no off-ramp. This is the rule, not the exception.

      It was only two years from the time Intel announced the kit until they will stop supporting them. The customers I work with expect a 5-7 year lifecycle out of this class of machine minimum. There is zero chance they are going to switch to a shiny new platform if a manufacturer isn't committed to it. That's why they still buy NCR's stuff. It's not spectacular, it's not even good in many cases. That said you can trust that they will support it until the cows come home.

  3. Raspberry Pi by DrYak · · Score: 2

    ...and meanwhile, the raspberry pi lives...

    --
    "Sufficiently advanced satire is indistinguishable from reality." - [Tips: 1DrYakQDKCQ6y52z6QbnkxHXAocMZJE61o ]
    1. Re:Raspberry Pi by 110010001000 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Even though everyone on Slashdot says "the raspberry pi sucks!" Yeah, well, guess what? They start at $5.

  4. This is Intel's problem in a nutshell by timholman · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Intel doesn't want to compete in low-margin product areas where it can only make a few dollars off each sale. Intel wants to sell expensive desktop and laptop processors where it is the only supplier, and rake in the profits. That is the market that made Intel what it is today, and is also very clearly the type of business that its current management wants to pursue. Managing a low-margin product line must be career suicide at Intel.

    This is why Intel abandoned the IoT and the Arduino-style computer markets (e.g. the Galileo). There's no money to be made in them (by their standards). I accepted some donated Galileo boards from Intel, and tried in vain for months to get them to provide some additional parts. Every few months when I emailed an engineer, he had moved on to another department within Intel. The Galileo product line had the stench of death on it from the very beginning.

    1. Re:This is Intel's problem in a nutshell by Gravis+Zero · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Intel doesn't want to compete in low-margin product areas where it can only make a few dollars off each sale. Intel wants to sell expensive desktop and laptop processors where it is the only supplier, and rake in the profits.

      Actually, the real money is in the server market. Low-end desktops don't rake in much cash either but the high-end ones are far more profitable.

      Intel is really killing everything that isn't a real money maker because they are losing money on them due to that fact that there is real competition in these sectors from non-x86 chips. Intel is suffering mostly because of their (relatively) high prices and fierce NDA policies which drive people to competitors.

      Intel's real innovation has always been in anti-competitive behavior so when they are unable to rig the game, they fold.

      --
      Anons need not reply. Questions end with a question mark.