Slashdot Mirror


Intel Says It Will Stop Developing Compute Cards

Intel will not develop new Compute Cards, the company said this week. From a report: Compute Cards were Intel's vision of modular computing that would allow customers to continually update point of sale systems, all-in-one desktops, laptops and other devices. Pull out one card, replace it with another, and you have a new CPU, plus RAM and storage. "We continue to believe modular computing is a market where there are many opportunities for innovation," an Intel spokesperson told Tom's Hardware. "However, as we look at the best way to address this opportunity, we've made the decision that we will not develop new Compute Card products moving forward. We will continue to sell and support the current Compute Card products through 2019 to ensure our customers receive the support they need with their current solutions, and we are thankful for their partnership on this change."

5 of 42 comments (clear)

  1. because they SUCKED! by SirAstral · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I tried two different version of these and they sucked bad.

    Here are some examples of problems.
    The biggest problem is the terrible implementation. Nothing was planned for expansion. The USB ports were limited though understandble, but often had a weird problem. The devices emitted an EMI field that prevented many wireless keyboards and mice from working. Had to get an extension usb cable or dongle to bring them far enough away from the device to function.
    No flexible cabling to plug them into devices with limited profiles for their HDMI connectors and really the same for the other ports. They really should have broken out ports to allow for far more flexibility than they did. The NUC was not as bad as the Sticks because they had more surface area to work with but still found many problems with them.

    Their designs just kept them down and prevented them from being as useful as they could have been.

    1. Re:because they SUCKED! by EvilSS · · Score: 4, Informative

      Are you confusing these for the compute sticks with the compute cards? The cards are different. They are basically a cartridge you plugged into a POS system, laptop, or all-in-one, or a little dock using their NexDock interface. https://www.intel.com/content/www/us/en/products/boards-kits/compute-card.html

      --
      I browse on +1 so AC's need not respond, I won't see it.
    2. Re: because they SUCKED! by SirAstral · · Score: 3, Funny

      Was that YOUR dad? cause judging by the resulting child you are probably ugly as sin too, if feel sorry for ya! I don't blame you for posting as AC now!

  2. This is Intel's problem in a nutshell by timholman · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Intel doesn't want to compete in low-margin product areas where it can only make a few dollars off each sale. Intel wants to sell expensive desktop and laptop processors where it is the only supplier, and rake in the profits. That is the market that made Intel what it is today, and is also very clearly the type of business that its current management wants to pursue. Managing a low-margin product line must be career suicide at Intel.

    This is why Intel abandoned the IoT and the Arduino-style computer markets (e.g. the Galileo). There's no money to be made in them (by their standards). I accepted some donated Galileo boards from Intel, and tried in vain for months to get them to provide some additional parts. Every few months when I emailed an engineer, he had moved on to another department within Intel. The Galileo product line had the stench of death on it from the very beginning.

    1. Re:This is Intel's problem in a nutshell by Gravis+Zero · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Intel doesn't want to compete in low-margin product areas where it can only make a few dollars off each sale. Intel wants to sell expensive desktop and laptop processors where it is the only supplier, and rake in the profits.

      Actually, the real money is in the server market. Low-end desktops don't rake in much cash either but the high-end ones are far more profitable.

      Intel is really killing everything that isn't a real money maker because they are losing money on them due to that fact that there is real competition in these sectors from non-x86 chips. Intel is suffering mostly because of their (relatively) high prices and fierce NDA policies which drive people to competitors.

      Intel's real innovation has always been in anti-competitive behavior so when they are unable to rig the game, they fold.

      --
      Anons need not reply. Questions end with a question mark.