Slashdot Mirror


First All-Female Spacewalk Canceled Because NASA Doesn't Have Two Suits That Fit (npr.org)

The first all-female spacewalk scheduled for Friday has been cancelled by NASA (Warning: source may be paywalled; alternative source) because they don't have two spacesuits that fit the female astronauts. According to The New York Times, Anne C. McClain and Christina H. Koch both need to wear a medium-size torso component, but only one is readily available at the International Space Station. From the report: The mission itself is unchanged. On Friday, two astronauts will venture outside of the space station on a six-hour mission to install massive lithium-ion batteries that will help to power the research laboratory. Ms. Koch is still scheduled to participate, along with her fellow astronaut Nick Hague; Ms. McClain did her first spacewalk last week. But the first women-only venture outside of the confines of the space station will have to happen on another day. "After consulting with McClain and Hague following the first spacewalk, mission managers decided to adjust the assignments, due in part to spacesuit availability on the station," NASA said in a statement.

Stephanie Schierholz, a spokeswoman for NASA, said in an interview on Monday that there were already two medium-size hard upper torsos -- "essentially the shirt of the spacesuit," according to NASA -- at the space station. But there were a couple of issues. One was that Ms. McClain had thought she would be able to work in a large-size torso, but after her spacewalk last Friday, she wore a medium-size torso and learned that it fit her better. Ms. Koch also uses the same size. And of the two medium-size torsos available, one has yet to be properly configured for a spacewalk. It would take hours of crew labor -- not to mention some additional risk -- to fix that in time for Friday. Instead of doing that, NASA decided to simply switch out the astronauts. In the end, both women will have done a spacewalk -- just not together.

8 of 181 comments (clear)

  1. Not even wrong. by Gravis+Zero · · Score: 5, Insightful

    because they don't have two spacesuits that fit the female astronauts

    These do have two spacesuits that fit the female astronauts, just not ones that are tooled for this particular mission.

    "Two mediums existed on the ISS, but only one was prepped for a spacewalk. Instead of devoting extensive crew time to make the extra medium-sized suit space-worthy by Friday, NASA decided to restaff"

    I think it's equally important to recognize that both NASA and the astronauts are putting the mission first.

    --
    Anons need not reply. Questions end with a question mark.
    1. Re:Not even wrong. by mjwx · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I think it's equally important to recognize that both NASA and the astronauts are putting the mission first.

      So will SJWs when they howl in outrage over invented sexism of this situation.

      The only one's I've heard howling are people howling about how the WSJ's or whatever are allegedly howling...

      We get it, you're afraid that somewhere, someone you don't like is being treated as an equal, but can you just bitch about it in private like you did in the 90's. Fuck I miss that decade.

      --
      Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
  2. Holy Hell by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    I thought the left wing stuff was baloney but here you cock suckers are being so terrified of women doing anything that you have to insult them. /. is full of a bunch of fucking pansy asses. What a bunch of pussy ass bitches you all are.

  3. Re:Just a PR stunt... by Rockoon · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I mentally replaced all references to the feminine with the masculine within the summary while reading it. Amazingly, I found the references to gender suddenly both extremely offensive and still unnecessary.

    The story is sexist bullshit masquerading as social justice pandering.

    --
    "His name was James Damore."
  4. Conspiracy theories aside, lack of preparation? by LostMyBeaver · · Score: 5, Insightful

    It seems to me that lack of preparation is an issue here.

    Even the blurb explains that the issue was that there was a planned spacewalk and although there are 6 astronauts on board the ISS at this time and there has been some time to make the decision to prepare the space suits, no one saw fit to ... well... to fit the suits appropriately.

    Who gives a shit about the gender of the astronauts beyond ensuring there is appropriate necessities in the ISS to facilitate their gender specific needs? This could have easily been a similar problem if one of the astronauts was a smaller male. They are basically two nerds, one a mechanical and aerospace engineer and the other, a physicist and electrical engineer.

    This past year has been one whole year of :
      - First female to win Abel award... yeh... she won it because she's a she... not because she is one of the most brilliant mathematicians of the last 70 years
      - All female spacewalk cancelled... yeh, they're astronauts because they're girls, not because they both achieved top marks from top schools in areas of science and engineering.
      - all female..
      - first woman...

    I mean seriously... what's the f-ing point here? Exceptional people are exceptional people... and moron journalists are moron journalists... done.

    1. Re:Conspiracy theories aside, lack of preparation? by ceoyoyo · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Kind of. NASA has said they didn't plan an all-female spacewalk, it just happened in the schedule. It then got hyped, probably when the PR department noticed it. I'm sure there was a bunch of discussion at NASA about political impact and whether it was worth preflighting a second medium or sending McClean back out in a large.

      To their immense credit, NASA and the astronauts made the right decision. Now that they've experienced the wrath of the twit-verse, they may not the next time.

  5. Re:Just a PR stunt... by AmiMoJo · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Neither seems sexist, they are just noting the first time a particular demographic is doing something that other demographics have been doing for decades.

    You are being over-sensitive.

    --
    const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
    SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
  6. Re:Just a PR stunt... by AmiMoJo · · Score: 3, Insightful

    For something to be sexist it has to have some negative repercussion for one gender. Since the notability here comes from the fact that it is something which men have been doing for decades but women have still not had the opportunity to do, it doesn't create disadvantage or have any negative effects, and thus is not sexist.

    --
    const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
    SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC