Slashdot Mirror


Airbnb Has a Hidden-Camera Problem (theatlantic.com)

Airbnb says it's cracking down on hosts who record guests. But is it doing enough? From a report: Airbnb's rules allow cameras outdoors and in living rooms and common areas, but never in bathrooms or anywhere guests plan to sleep, including rooms with foldout beds. Starting in early 2018, Airbnb added another layer of disclosure: If hosts indicate they have cameras anywhere on their property, guests receive a pop-up informing them where the cameras are located and where they are aimed. To book the property, the guests must click "agree," indicating that they're aware of the cameras and consent to being filmed.

Of course, hosts have plenty of reason to train cameras on the homes they rent out to strangers. They can catch guests who attempt to steal, or who trash the place, or who initially say they're traveling alone, then show up to a property with five people. A representative for Airbnb's Trust & Safety communications department told me the company tries to filter out hosts who may attempt to surveil guests by matching them against sex-offender and felony databases. The company also uses risk scores to flag suspicious behavior, in addition to reviewing and booting hosts with consistently poor scores.

If a guest contacts Airbnb's Trust & Safety team with a complaint about a camera, employees offer new accommodations if necessary and open an investigation into the host. [...] But four guests who found cameras in their rentals told The Atlantic the company has inconsistently applied its own rules when investigating their claims, providing them with incorrect information and making recommendations that they say risked putting them in harm's way. "There have been super terrible examples of privacy violations by AirBnB hosts, e.g., people have found cameras hidden in alarm clocks in their bedrooms," wrote Jeff Bigham, a computer-science professor at Carnegie Mellon whose claim was initially denied after he reported cameras in his rental. "I feel like our experience is in some ways more insidious. If you find a truly hidden camera in your bedroom or bathroom, Airbnb will support you. If you find an undisclosed camera in the private living room, Airbnb will not support you."

22 of 127 comments (clear)

  1. No surprise by fluffernutter · · Score: 3

    You are staying in someone's house and they have no oversight by any authority.... what did you THINK was going to happen?

    --
    Laws are rules for the court, but merely a bottom bar to hit for life. Think beyond laws in your actions always.
  2. Maybe... by Sir_Eptishous · · Score: 3, Informative

    the reason people choose to stay in AirBNB is because they know they will be recorded.

    --
    We play the game with the bravery of being out of range
  3. Sharing economy at it's best by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    This is an interesting aspect to the sharing economy that nobody talks about. With the industrialized versions of things like hotels and taxis and the like, the companies are subject to oversight and regulation that eliminates the fringes of society from causing problems. The sharing economy skirts those regulations and allows individuals to become competitive with the big companies in those areas, but with no oversight the people in the weird fringes of society become front and center.

    What happens when someone releases online a video of a minor changing or in the bathroom? AirBnB would argue they're not responsible, but they enabled and could be considered an accessory. Does it bring the whole thing down?

    It seems like all these sharing economy deals are constantly fighting the fringe of society's weird habits, all the way to the point where they die or they end up looking like the highly regulated industries they were trying to disrupt.

    1. Re:Sharing economy at it's best by fluffernutter · · Score: 3, Insightful

      We're just seeing the tip of the iceberg. We'll be so far down the rabbit hole praising seemingly inexpensive services that cut regulations it will be too late to go back when we figure out that those regulations are there for good reason forged by real live experience. Something like how we let Google and Facebook violate everyone's privacy and now that is very difficult to undo.

      --
      Laws are rules for the court, but merely a bottom bar to hit for life. Think beyond laws in your actions always.
  4. even the 'acceptable cameras' aren't by vux984 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Airbnb's rules allow cameras outdoors and in living rooms and common areas, but never in bathrooms or anywhere guests plan to sleep, including rooms with foldout beds.

    I don't really see how a camera in the living room is acceptable either.

    1. Re:even the 'acceptable cameras' aren't by vux984 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      "Looking forward to hearing you complain when you let a bunch of randoms stay in your house while you're away and they end up trashing it "

      I wouldn't let randos stay in my house while I was away. So I will never have that problem.

      And if I did purchase a 2ndary property to rent out to randos, I'd furnish it accordingly, and insure it accordingly, and then charge accordingly. And I still wouldn't put a camera in the living room.

    2. Re:even the 'acceptable cameras' aren't by vux984 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      "There is plenty of evidence others would."

      Sure. Lots of people are stupid and do stupid things. We don't even need hard evidence of that, but I agree lots of people rent their house out to randos without thinking it through.

      For what its worth though, I've rented a fair number of short term rentals around the world, and all the ones I've stayed at were NOT someone's regular home -- they have been 2ndary properties permanently run as short term rentals, furnished accordingly, nice, clean, but nothing especially valuable in them; and in most of the cases I even interacted with a property manager rather than the property owner.

      "And there is no real hard evidence you would not other than some declaration made anonymously in slashdot."

      Hard evidence of me personally? Sure I guess not, but there is plenty of hard evidence that LOTS of people are running their short term rentals the same way I claimed I would. Go look at airbnd... lots of them are clearly and obviously no one's primary residence. And there is also plenty of hard evidence that lots of people aren't running their primary residence as a short term rental when they go on vacation.

      So I'm not sure what your point was in attempting to shoot down my argument by attacking my credibility... surely you don't find it that incredible that people would operate the way I claim to. Surely you agree beyond a doubt that there are plenty of people doing exactly what I claimed I'd do.

  5. Disconnect from the Internet by pak9rabid · · Score: 2

    Considering most (all?) of these cameras are cloud-based, and thus rely on an Internet connection, just disconnect the modem/router when you first arrive if you're really that concerned about it and only re-connect it when you need to use it for something. Problem solved.

  6. Airbnb by ledow · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Gee, it's almost like it's a bad idea to use a middleman to rent out your home on a per-day basis to random strangers who you don't trust enough to not put cameras everywhere, and who don't want you to put cameras everywhere, and where the middleman says you can't put cameras everywhere without telling everyone what the cameras can't see and some places you can't put cameras at all, and then relying on some unspoken trust model to make it all work.

    I can't see a problem with that business model *at all*.

    Airbnb is one of the most ridiculous things I've ever heard of. It has nothing *but* advantages for the people renting those places out, and nothing *but* disadvantages for the person doing the renting.

    1. Re:Airbnb by TechyImmigrant · · Score: 2

      >Airbnb is one of the most ridiculous things I've ever heard of. It has nothing *but* advantages for the people renting those places out, and nothing *but* disadvantages for the person doing the renting.

      Advantages for the host : They get money.
      Advantages for the guest : It usually costs less. It's often available in places that hotels are not available.
      Disadvantages for the host : They don't get to use the property they are renting out for their own purposes. There's a shitton of cleaning to do.
      Disadvantages for the guest : Ummm. You don't get SPG points. I dunno. I host and I use airbnbs and it's all around more convenient and cheaper than hotels.

      --
      I should use this sig to advertise my book ISBN-13 : 978-1501515132.
    2. Re:Airbnb by Whorhay · · Score: 2

      I would say one disadvantage to the guest, though some might view it as an advantage, is that the experience isn't predictable. My family almost always uses a specific chain of hotels because we've always been happy with the rooms we've rented so far as cleanliness, smell, amenities, furnishings and in particular the feel of the mattresses that they use. It's the same reason chain restaurants are so popular, they provide a consistent experience.

  7. you take the risk by fermion · · Score: 5, Insightful
    All of these services cut costs by transferring risk to consumer. This is their business model, to circumvent decades of regulations, and provide value to those who want it. There is nothing wrong with this, except that generations of Americans have grown up being protected, and they continue to believe those protections are in place even when they clearly are not.

    So, if you pay for the Hampton, there are a bunch of things that come with it. It is unlikely that you are going to be filmed having sex because the entire assets of the corporation are going to be up for grabs when some wiley lawyer takes the case.

    On there other hand, there is no reason that an AirBnB renter has not to film you having sex, or that AirBnb has to prevent this. There renter is going to have minimal exposure, and AIrBnB has none as long as it makes a passing effort to say it does not support such actions.

    --
    "She's a scientist and a lesbian. She's not going to let it slide." Orphan Black
    1. Re:you take the risk by DarkOx · · Score: 2

      I find it astonishing that anyone is interested in this business model. Even if you have a vacation home or something that is usually vacant there are property management companies that do things like properly vet renters; help make sure you have the right types of insurance (or sell it to you), have cheaper bulk contracts with maid services etc to handle clean up before and after renters visit. Yes they take a bigger bit of the action than Airbnb does of course but on the other hand they take on a lot more of the risk.

      I can only imagine how it go for a lessor if say a guest is hurt or killed because say a deck collapses (even after said guest put way to many people on it) and some lawyer finds there was even the slightest of building code or maintenance violations...

      Why the hell would you want to risk your life being destroyed to make a few hundred bucks?

      --
      Repeal the 17th Amendment TODAY! Also Please Read http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/right-to-read.html
    2. Re:you take the risk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      That's what umbrella insurance is for. In my case, I gross $30k+ per year from my vacation rental, so it's more than a few hundred bucks. And because I do all the management work, my expenses are tax deductible. For me, Airbnb has been great, and 95% of the guests I have had have been pretty perfect. The couple who were less than perfect didn't actually do any real damage.

  8. Re:Simple solution: by ledow · · Score: 2

    Not hard.

    I take two sets of images in the first ten minutes of getting there, modify the dates on them, trash the place, claim them to be my "before" and "after" images, and then the next guy who rents it out starts with a trashed place and there's not really much you can do. Or, hell, just tidy the bits and pick the right camera angle.

    This isn't rocket science. The aim is to stop your place getting trashed by people who have little to no consequences for doing so (Or else why would you need the camera? Just take your own photos before renting, which prove they trashed it, and the consequences fall on the person responsible). Not to lay blame after it's been trashed.

    And in the same way that the people renting the place can trash it without consequences, the people who are renting it out can breach privacy, record sex tapes and not tell anyone without consequences. Maybe not by the letter of the law, but Airbnb wouldn't have these problems in the first place if everyone just abided by the law.

    The problem is endemic to the service they're trying to provide - because they are providing it outside any bounds of normality or sensibility. Maybe if you said "To use Airbnb you must lay down a $1000 deposit which we will only refund to your account when the owner says that the condition is good, the property wasn't misused and nothing was stolen" and then use normal renting/surveying normalities to assess that. Then one deposit of $1000, and keeping sensible, keeps your costs down to cheap places only, and you get your $1000 back. And trashing a place costs you $1000 a time, minimal.

    But at the moment you can pay a pittance for one person, rent out someone's posh flat for the day, invite 1000 people over, trash it, and pretty much the consequences are minimal. Guess who's gonna use that... drug dens, raves, teenage drunken bashes, brothels. Next day, do the same but have your mate sign up and choose the venue instead of you, and then divide the rent by 1000 people each to cover the cost. Who the hell is going to know? And it'll take 1000 such incidents before you get anywhere near difficulty in signing up with a new account.

    Airbnb is a stupid idea. And they aren't monitoring either of their customers properly, as it shows.

    Either *AirBNB* come in, certify the place is in good nick, take ID of the renting party, take a deposit, take responsibility for their actions, have insurance, rectify any damage, and check at the end of the rental to ensure everything is how it was, or you're basically putting a sign in a shop window saying "House to rent / trash, $100 a day, no checks required".

    Just quite what part are AirBNB playing in the entire transaction? They run a website. That's about it.

    P.S. you can't secure anything in a house that someone with a couple of minutes and a few tools can't get into. Not even a safe. Let alone entire fecking rooms.

  9. If I am on camera .. by OzPeter · · Score: 2

    If I am on camera then it's the owner who has a problem .. because he gets to see me walk around naked and sit on the furniture naked and peer out the window naked and surf for "not-porn" naked etc etc etc

    And I am not exactly a male model

    But yeah .. I shouldn't have to worry about being spied on. AirBnB already has my cc and other details so it would be easy for them to track me down after the fact.

    Now I am wondering if if some sort of infrared laser gizmo exists that would blank out all the cameras in a room?

    --
    I am Slashdot. Are you Slashdot as well?
  10. Re:Why would you call AirBNB about it by Nidi62 · · Score: 2

    Nope, you just have no idea what the law is, being a moron generally.

    A lot of locations have laws against short term rentals (ie, hotels) in residential zones or properties. Many also have hotel taxes that AirBnB properties avoid paying even they are operating as hotels, and generally aren't up to code for fire/safety conditions the law specifies for hotels.

    --
    The only thing necessary for evil to triumph is for it to be pitted against a slightly greater evil
  11. Re:Simple solution: by Locke2005 · · Score: 2

    That brings up another issue: if AirBnb in indemnifying renters whose property gets damaged, what's to stop them from renting to someone, coming in after they leave and trashing the place, and having AirBnb pick up the tab for their remodel? I'm pretty sure some people have tried it...

    --
    I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
  12. Get Over It by Improbus · · Score: 2

    Cameras are everywhere. They are getting smaller and more plentiful every year. The world truly is a stage and we are the players. Be smarter than a politician and just assume you are always being recorded.

  13. Re:cameras are not allowed in hotel rooms or apart by magarity · · Score: 2

    cameras are not allowed in hotel rooms or apartments.

    They are allowed in hotel lobbies, elevators, stairwells, and hallways. Is an Airbnb's living room area under the same category?

  14. What happens? Jail. by SuperKendall · · Score: 2

    The sharing economy skirts those regulations and allows individuals to become competitive with the big companies in those areas, but with no oversight the people in the weird fringes of society become front and center.

    So what do we call Slashdot ACs? The Aristocrats.

    Your elitism is appalling.

    What happens when someone releases online a video of a minor changing or in the bathroom?

    Jail, because there are laws against that kind of thing you know?

    In particular for this topic, there are in fact laws in many places against recording people without them knowing. I wouldn't say the desire to see what renters are doing to a property is in any way "fringe" and I think you are quite a horrible person for attempting to belittle the people trying ti make money from personal property.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  15. Is this really AirBNB-specific? by virtig01 · · Score: 2

    Less than a week ago, a couple of guys were busted for planting 30 cameras in hotel rooms in Korea. They then sold the livestreams to subscribers.

    I don't see this as a problem created by AirBNB disrupting the hotel industry; it's a result of small, cheap, network accessible cameras.