Slashdot Mirror


Russia Orders Major VPN Providers To Block 'Banned' Sites (torrentfreak.com)

Russian authorities have ordered ten major VPN providers to begin blocking sites on the country's blacklist. "NordVPN, ExpressVPN, IPVanish and HideMyAss are among those affected," reports TorrentFreak. "TorGuard also received a notification and has pulled its services out of Russia with immediate effect." From the report: During the past few days, telecoms watch Roscomnadzor says it sent compliance notifications to 10 major VPN services with servers inside Russia -- NordVPN, ExpressVPN, TorGuard, IPVanish, VPN Unlimited, VyprVPN, Kaspersky Secure Connection, HideMyAss!, Hola VPN, and OpenVPN. The government agency is demanding that the affected services begin interfacing with the FGIS database, blocking the sites listed within. Several other local companies -- search giant Yandex, Sputnik, Mail.ru, and Rambler -- are already connected to the database and filtering as required.

"In accordance with paragraph 5 of Article 15.8 of the Federal Law No. 149-FZ of 27.07.2006 'On Information, Information Technology and on Protection of Information' hereby we are informing you about the necessity to get connected to the Federal state informational system of the blocked information sources and networks [FGIS] within thirty working days from the receipt [of this notice]," the notice reads. A notice received by TorGuard reveals that the provider was indeed given just under a month to comply. The notice also details the consequences for not doing so, i.e being placed on the blacklist with the rest of the banned sites so it cannot operate in Russia. The demand from Roscomnadzor sent to TorGuard and the other companies also requires that they hand over information to the authorities, including details of their operators and places of business. The notice itself states that for foreign entities, Russian authorities require the full entity name, country of residence, tax number and/or trade register number, postal and email address details, plus other information.

12 of 87 comments (clear)

  1. And if they are any good... by jtrainor · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Their answer will be "lol no".

    1. Re:And if they are any good... by rtb61 · · Score: 2

      To run a VPN efficiently, you should run the company in as many countries as possible. So from Russia, you VPN to your American subsidiary VPN, so traffic is VPN to VPN, it is cheaper because the in country traffic is cheaper. So the local VPN links to no one but their VPN subsidiaries in other countries, who then establish actual traffic. Technically you are only ever establishing network traffic with your offshore subsidiary and they are adhering to the law at that location.

      All you need is one person at that location, to do paperwork and of course rent a server on a server farm as the VPN, how to expand globally, from a small office in one country. All your network contacts are VPN to VPN internationally (all traffic tightly encrypted, with no indication of who to or from) and VPN to the internet only locally.

      --
      Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
    2. Re:And if they are any good... by mark-t · · Score: 4, Interesting

      These companies have servers in Russia, and each will individually either have to comply or cease operations in Russia. It's worth noting that after receiving the notice, TorGuard, one of the ten companies mentioned in the article, has already responded to this,and left Russia of its own accord, since they consider the compliance terms unacceptable for their use case.

    3. Re:And if they are any good... by infolation · · Score: 2

      Users don't need a VPN provider to use a VPN, they need a single-core VPS which can be obtained for the around monthly cost of a VPN and without making a traceable payment.

      Scripts like streisand mean that a user can put together their own VPN server (and Tor OBFS4 private bridge) on a cheap VPS paid with monero.

      How can countries who claim to 'ban VPNs' ever hope to ban every VPS provider in the world?

  2. New Zealand by Kunedog · · Score: 2, Informative

    Meanwhile, NZ has already had a blacklist of sites blocked for a while.

    1. Re:New Zealand by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      You forgot to mention the EU and upload filters.

      Now your whataboutism may only get to +4 Insightful.

  3. They Blocked My VPN by CanadianMacFan · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Just great! They blocked my VPN provider. Now how am I going to, um, hmmm, ... ah, never mind.

    On a serious note I hope that something happens that the people of Russia can start getting their freedoms back.

    1. Re:They Blocked My VPN by jfdavis668 · · Score: 3, Funny

      Maybe they will have a revolution next October.

  4. Re:TorGuard pulled services by BlazeMiskulin · · Score: 4, Insightful

    In most cases, I agree with you.

    With regard to VPNs, however, I must disagree. VPNs are a valuable tool in subverting censorship and giving those who live in censored countries access to the information they need to make changes.

    I spent 6 years behind the Great Firewall. I know what it's like to be in a country that controls the internet with a heavy hand. If all the VPNs pulled out it would just bolster the power of the oppressive governments.

    We don't want "echo chambers". We want free and open discourse, the exchange of ideas, and mutual understanding between countries and cultures. The way to overthrow oppressive regimes is to give the citizens access to information, insight, and opinion and let them make their own decisions.

  5. Re:VPN is now just another ISP? by fustakrakich · · Score: 2

    A crypto, P2P, onion routing network that's able to escape any gov lists and bans.

    Still has to go through your ISP. They can block the protocols, ports, etc.

    --
    “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
  6. Re:TorGuard pulled services by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Maybe you don't realize that The Guardian is a private institution from Britain. Their rights to free speech on their own platform overrides that of their user base. The same also applies in most Western nations including the US. Private institutions, while not acting very nice, can censor as much as they want.
    You are free to create your own platforms, where your free speech overrides that of the users. If enough people like your opinions, the free market will run its course and your platform may become very popular, possibly rivalling platforms like The Guardian.

    As a half Westerner you ought to know that it's different when governments start to censor however, or if they pressure private institution to censor.
    Then the government starts to censor it will be difficult for you to create your own platforms where you can exercise your rights, since there's no competition to be had with the government. If you compete with them through speech they deemed illegal, they can brand you a criminal for speaking your opinions. They can shut you up by jailing and convicting you. Private institutions can't just do that.

    This makes censorship pushed by the government highly abusable and a lot more concerning than voluntary censorship by private institutions.

  7. Re:Need a Score Card by elrous0 · · Score: 2

    We're just getting started. China and Russia have already banned most VPN's. You can bet that New Zealand will be the next to ban them (purely to protect their citizens from white supremacy, of course), followed by an EU-wide ban. Canada and Australia will follow. How long after that before some opportunistic politicians in the U.S. try to follow suite?

    --
    SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.