Slashdot Mirror


Fukushima Contaminants Found As Far North As Alaska's Bering Strait

Radioactive contamination from Japan's Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant hit by a tsunami in 2011 has drifted as far north as waters off a remote Alaska island in the Bering Strait, scientists said on Wednesday. Reuters reports: Analysis of seawater collected last year near St. Lawrence Island revealed a slight elevation in levels of radioactive cesium-137 attributable to the Fukushima disaster, the University of Alaska Fairbanks Sea Grant program said. The newly detected Fukushima radiation was minute. The level of cesium-137, a byproduct of nuclear fission, in seawater was just four-tenths as high as traces of the isotope naturally found in the Pacific Ocean. Those levels are far too low to pose a health concern, an important point for people living on the Bering Sea coast who subsist on food caught in the ocean.

Those levels are far too low to pose a health concern, an important point for people living on the Bering Sea coast who subsist on food caught in the ocean, Sheffield said. Until the most recent St. Lawrence Island sample was tested by the Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution, the only other known sign of Fukushima radiation in the Bering Sea was detected in 2014 by the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration.

13 of 75 comments (clear)

  1. So what by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    There are lots of contaminants from lots of things in lots of places.

    We can detect tiny trace amounts of them with the instruments we have today.

    And of course there is no health concern. I'm glad that was in the summary, because there are people who are ignorant enough to believe otherwise.

    1. Re:So what by Dunbal · · Score: 2

      Potassium is the primary intracellular cation. Cells are designed to hold on to their potassium with ATP powered sodium/potassium pumps on their membranes, shoving sodium out and taking potassium into the cytosol. Therefore it stands to reason that cesium would bio-accumulate if it is similar to potassium - the longer you are exposed to it in your diet the higher the cesium fraction in your cells.

      --
      Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
    2. Re:So what by sfcat · · Score: 4, Informative

      Perhaps you should stop talking about stuff you have no freaking idea about?

      Since when has that ever stopped you.

      Your body treats cesium like potassium. It does not bioaccumulate. Your human body, perhaps. No idea. But how is that relevant when your food does?

      https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/p...

      Your link is paywalled and we can only read the abstract. And since fish, shrimp and things people eat don't use Cesium to build their body structure, they won't accumulate heavy metals over time. Cesium, like Strontium, is a heavy metal and won't combine with carbon or participate in other biological reactions. That's why most experts worry about Iodine and not Cesium or Strontium when evaluating the risk of bio-accumulation of medium lived fission products. But Iodine's isotopes are harder to detect than Cesium's which is why you see these articles about Cesium. The fact we can detect it at all says more about the sensitivity of our instruments than risk to the environment. They are measuring a difference of 0.4 atomic events per volume of seawater! Remember the conversion factor there is on the order of 10^22!

      --
      "Those that start by burning books, will end by burning men."
    3. Re:So what by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Iodine is a complete different story as it accumulates in your Thyroid.

      Cesium, like Strontium, is a heavy metal and won't combine with carbon or participate in other biological reactions
      It does. It replaces potassium and acts more or less like it ...

      That's why most experts worry about Iodine and not Cesium or Strontium when evaluating the risk of bio-accumulation of medium lived fission products
      Sure ... in your world. In my world they worry about mushrooms, wild boar eating mushrooms, deer eating mushrooms, humans eating mushrooms, deer and wild boar ... oops, and that Caesium.

      No idea about the link, but the numbers are clearly in the summary, if you don't like it, google for another one, should be easy.

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    4. Re:So what by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 2, Informative

      The deer pisses out the Cs-137 just like the other isotopes of Cs they consume normally when eating mushrooms.
      Only over a considerable amount of time, it is not like: oops I accidentally ate some Cs-137 and now need to go to pee quickly. As long as they eat the mushrooms they have a higher level ...

      Heavy metals just don't work the same way as organic molecules. Of course not. They accumulate in the kidneys and leaver, or wander into the bone marrow ... or in this case, no idea why you neglect it: in he nervous system. I told you now several times that Cs is a potassium "ersatz". Everywhere where the body usually uses potassium, cesium is displacing it and thus cesium is bioaccumulated, in everything that is eating it.

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/... scroll to: "Health and safety hazards"

      Interesting read, too: accumulation of cesium in human bones: https://www.jstage.jst.go.jp/a...

      No idea where you got your misinformation about cesium from. It is an alkali metal, obviously it acts everwhere where other alkali metals act.

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
  2. Re:determine sedimentation rates with this old tri by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 4, Funny

    The only people that were happy with Fukushima were the geologists that use nuclear markers in sediment samples. With air testing of nukes long gone and Chernobyl fading there were plenty of labs that popped champagne that day.

    New conspiracy theory: The geologists somehow triggered the 2011 earthquake and tsunami, in order to cause the meltdown and create new radioactive markers in the sediment.

    Proof: Why else would they have champagne chilled and ready to go?

  3. Not the first time and won't be the last. by burtosis · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Like the time a Russian spy satellite powered by a nuclear reactor burned up in the upper atmosphere releasing roughly 90 lbs of uranium particles into the atmosphere? Everyone alive at the time probably has a few atoms of it in their bodies. While trivial compared to background radiation this kind of pollution can easily get out of hand so serious regulation and cleanup is necessary but people shouldn't get too worked up as natural sources of radiation are everywhere and dwarf the trace amounts we are detecting in the op article.

    1. Re:Not the first time and won't be the last. by quenda · · Score: 2

      Like the time a Russian spy satellite powered by a nuclear reactor burned up in the upper atmosphere releasing roughly 90 lbs of uranium particles into the atmosphere?

      The author of that article is clueless. U235 "highly radioactive"? No. If so, it would not have lasted for billions of years in the earth's crust, along with u238, thorium and potassium-40.
      Perhaps the writer is confusing it with the Plutonium 238 used in space probe RTGs?
      The concern with reactors crashing, weapon tests, and power reactor accidents is not the large amount of near-stable uranium, but the small amount of fission byproducts, such as the caesium-137 in the above article.

      Everyone alive at the time probably has a few atoms of it in their bodies.

      And countless atoms of uranium from other sources. About 0.1 mg. Lots more potassium 40 though!

  4. Re:How is 4/10 of normal an elevated level? by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 5, Insightful

    How is 4/10 of normal an elevated level?

    Obviously the journalist is an idiot.

    Here is a more competently written source: Fukushima radiation found in Bering Sea.

    The concentration of cesium 137 went from 2.0 to 2.4 becquerels per cubic meter.

  5. Re:determine sedimentation rates with this old tri by Falconhell · · Score: 2

    Nah, geologists have got rocks in their heads. :)

  6. As someone who's had 4 beers... by steveb3210 · · Score: 2

    You shouldn't have the same sentence twice in a summary.

  7. Testimony to detection technology by LynnwoodRooster · · Score: 2

    Way too low to be any impact to life, and probably below the level of detection just 10 years ago. The problem arises when we can detect things - way below safe levels - and people go OMG WE HAVE XXX PRESENT!

    --
    Browsing at +1 - no ACs, I ignore their posts. So refreshing!
  8. This is news? by Gription · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The Pacific Ocean in the Northern Hemisphere circulates in a clockwise direction. That puts Alaska as the 2nd place the current will reach after Russia.
    This isn't news. This is expected.