Machine Learning Is Making Pesto Even More Delicious (technologyreview.com)
An anonymous reader quotes a report from MIT Technology Review: Machine learning has been used to create basil plants that are extra-delicious. While we sadly cannot report firsthand on the herb's taste, the effort reflects a broader trend that involves using data science and machine learning to improve agriculture. The researchers behind the AI-optimized basil used machine learning to determine the growing conditions that would maximize the concentration of the volatile compounds responsible for basil's flavor. The study appears in the journal PLOS One today.
The basil was grown in hydroponic units within modified shipping containers in Middleton, Massachusetts. Temperature, light, humidity, and other environmental factors inside the containers could be controlled automatically. The researchers tested the taste of the plants by looking for certain compounds using gas chromatography and mass spectrometry. And they fed the resulting data into machine-learning algorithms developed at MIT and a company called Cognizant. The research showed, counterintuitively, that exposing plants to light 24 hours a day generated the best taste. The research group plans to study how the technology might improve the disease-fighting capabilities of plants as well as how different flora may respond to the effects of climate change.
The basil was grown in hydroponic units within modified shipping containers in Middleton, Massachusetts. Temperature, light, humidity, and other environmental factors inside the containers could be controlled automatically. The researchers tested the taste of the plants by looking for certain compounds using gas chromatography and mass spectrometry. And they fed the resulting data into machine-learning algorithms developed at MIT and a company called Cognizant. The research showed, counterintuitively, that exposing plants to light 24 hours a day generated the best taste. The research group plans to study how the technology might improve the disease-fighting capabilities of plants as well as how different flora may respond to the effects of climate change.
I have an indoor greenhouse/garden but pretty much every book I've read says you should at least give plants 2-4 hours of darkness.
This study says 24 hours of non-stop "sunlight" is the way to go.
Can anyone confirm if this is healthy for plants generally? I might have to switch my light timers.
Can it grow romaine lettuce without the E.coli?
Okay so to "revolutionize farming" what percent of crops need to be grown indoors under artificial light and what is the financial and environmental cost of that? I support progress and things like geothermal greenhouses if they reduce energy used in shipping. If you put a greenhouse partially in ground and use an air intake buried underground you can grow things that would be otherwise shipped in. Even if you supplement the lighting a bit that might be a win but I don't see how this revolutionizes agriculture in a sustainable way.
https://www.usatoday.com/story...
All the basil plants I ever buy end up dying. I have no idea what I'm doing wrong.
Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
I saw nothing in the links that showed the plants were *tasted* to see if they were better. Taste is a blend and highly subjective. Run those plants by some professional chefs so we can read their responses.
I keep rereading this but I only see three ... ?
Segregate jewggers.
This has been confirmed? Or is this just more machine learning is magic stuff.
Grow more dope!
Gee, I never realized that AGW was the opposite of machine learning (ML). Everything bad that happens is blamed on AGW, whether or not it makes any sense. Meanwhile, anything good can be made better with ML.
Burned your hamburger on the grill? Darn that AGW! Enjoyed a good beer with your burnt hamburger? Imagine how much better that beer would taste with a little ML.
Stupid hype is stupid, news at 11:00.
Enjoy life! This is not a dress rehearsal.
I have jet to meet a single person who actually LIKES pesto. Everyone loves it until you ask them one on one. They only "like" it because it is expected of them.
That's only acceptable if you're a Palestinian. Fake news doesn't report on what's happening in the Gaza concentration camp.
"The researchers tested the taste of the plants by looking for certain compounds using gas chromatography and mass spectrometry."
instead of really tasting it? it only should taste better theoretically, there aren't any real taste test results that confirm the actual taste is actually better (even though, this is a very subjective thing).
On a long enough timeline, the survival rate for everyone drops to zero.
AI-dente?
Soon the pesto will rise up and takes over.
Because, you know, they might have chosen the worst point the algorithm found instead of the best.
This reminds me of the short documentary film on Netflix Chev vs Science: The Ultimate Cooking Challenge (2016). Pits a scientist vs a two Michelin star chef.
Spoiler Alert: The chef made the better food.
https://www.netflix.com/title/80212222
u IMPERSONATE me & also ADMIT u have a /. acct & STALK me by UNIDENTIFIABLE ac https://hardware.slashdot.org/... - YOU got ISSUES.
That's "best ya got"?
u WISH u were ME (as ur POOR imitation = the sincerest form of flattery) WASTING ur life STALKING me by UNIDENTIFIABLE anon OR IMPERSONATING me!
APK
P.S.=> I BLOW U AWAY https://tech.slashdot.org/comm... + https://it.slashdot.org/commen... + https://yro.slashdot.org/comme...
Slashdot needs to implement a feature like Reddit where we can add "flair" to the title. In this case [MISLEADING] would be appropriate.
Pesto is disgusting.
We needed a special research team and all that computer equipment to tell us what gardeners have known for DECADES? CENTURIES?
When I buy a potted basil plant, there is a tag encouraging plenty of light. Gardening books spell out the care and feeding of all kinds of plants.
Seriously, ALL THAT MONEY AND TIME was spent to do nothing more than reaffirm what we already know. Great big DUH!
Eternity: will that be smoking, or non-smoking? I Corinthians 6:9-10
APK is right
I wish I was him so I can become a professional cum dumpster for truckers and host unlimited dicks.
He can teach me how to write like a serial killer and how to buy derelict houses in the ghetto for a $1.
I desperately need to know how to keep from being institutionalized while suffering from several different mental illnesses.
These are all areas where he is an expert and I want to learn from a true master of these skills.
Genetic selection with reanimation, rather than just growing conditions, should be worked on as well. Once a plant is sitting on your dinner plate its evolutionary future is very bleak. That plant, no matter how wonderful it tastes to you, is simply an instance in history. A one-off thing of the past. If however, the genomic material could be sampled, saved, and reanimated in the form of a seedling, then the food industry could transform itself from serving the current tasteless cardboard, where every plant is a genomic clone of a single fungal disease resistant plant.
Ever wondered what happened to the best-tasting bananas? Basically, they bread the taste out by breeding fungus resistance in. The growers and marketers let the taste take second place over 'production and packaging'. Once they find a resistant strain that packs and ships well (thick skin) they genetically remove the seeds, clone it in large numbers, and every plant on the plantation becomes an identical-twin seedling. Being able to select even the minor variations in taste, and positively selecting for it, could bring the natural taste back to the gastronomic marketplace.
First, every semi-automatic gun = machine gun.
Then every r/c aircraft = drone.
Then everyone claims AI systems when in fact they're just bog-standard (albeit-complex) if-then trees.
Regarding the OP: just crunching data is NOT "machine learning".
(RTFA and even they shorthand 'machine learning' into AI which it truly, truly isn't. Not even CLOSE.) This article fails to explain in any way how this experiment actually uses 'machine learning'. As far as I can tell, it's merely a broadly automated testing system where targeted variables are increased according to a pretty linear relationship of results. Essentially, it's just plain old Gregor Mendel's work, automated. THAT'S NOT MACHINE LEARNING, and it's absolutely nothing to do with AI.
(I've tweeted to Will Knight asking him about both of these questions, and will reply here with whatever he responds.)
-Styopa
All we have to do is to genetically modify the sun to shine for 24 hours a day to make more pestio, great tasty pesto.