Slashdot Mirror


US Conducted Secret Surveillance of China's Huawei, Prosecutors Say (reuters.com)

U.S. authorities gathered information about Huawei through secret surveillance that they plan to use in a case accusing the Chinese telecom equipment maker of sanctions-busting and bank fraud, prosecutors said on Thursday. From a report: Assistant U.S. Attorney Alex Solomon said at a hearing in federal court in Brooklyn that the evidence, obtained under the U.S. Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA), would require classified handling. The government notified Huawei in a court filing on Thursday of its intent to use the information, saying it was "obtained or derived from electronic surveillance and physical search," but gave no details. The United States has been pressuring other countries to drop Huawei from their cellular networks, worried its equipment could be used by Beijing for spying. The company says the concerns are unfounded. Brian Frey, a former federal prosecutor who is not involved in the Huawei case, said FISA surveillance, which requires a warrant from a special court, is generally sought in connection with suspected espionage.

106 comments

  1. How ironic... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Don't use Huawei equipment because it's opening you up to being spied upon! How do we know? Well, we spied upon Huawei of course. Wait... Where are you going?

    1. Re: How ironic... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Interesting

      Would you rather know that two agencies were spying on you or think that none were?

      The US btw ... only started spying on Huawei after having had several allies report odd behavior regarding corporate and military info being stolen and later appearing to be used in Chinese tech companies. The US, nor its allies who asked them about it, had a clue it connected together through Huawei.

      Having said that, Huawei are definitely killing it in product design and development, even if they had to steal IP/research in the past to get them going....

    2. Re:How ironic... by supremebob · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I think that US just wants less people using the Huawei network equipment with the Chinese backdoors in it's firmware, and the Cisco network equipment with the NSA backdoors in it's firmware instead. It just makes things a bit easier for our various three letter intelligence agencies. I mean, the Chinese keep changing the passwords on their backdoors, and it's a pain to have to brute force them instead of just looking them up in USpyWiki...

    3. Re:How ironic... by AmiMoJo · · Score: 0

      I wonder if it might help her avoid extradition. Seems like a good argument that she won't get a fair trial now that they admitted some of the evidence is secret and may hand been obtained illegally.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    4. Re:How ironic... by davmoo · · Score: 1

      Probably won't help her. It's only illegal when someone else does it. When the US does, it's perfectly fine. Just ask the US government.

      --
      I want a new quote. One that won't spill. One that don't cost too much. Or come in a pill.
    5. Re:How ironic... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      NSA works for us. China and Russia don't. Next.

    6. Re:How ironic... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Frankly this is how things work when you're a hegemon. You get to make the rules and spy on everyone to make sure your world order is, well, in order.

      In this case we had good reason to believe Huawei was trading with NK and Iran - And it turns out they were! There's also good reason that the party elite in China that have family ties to Huawei are a bit too cozy for comfort so we're suggesting everyone be not so eager to take up Huawei on their cheap telco gear.

      You can whine and whinge about being under the thumb if evil imperial ameirkkka but really consider the alternatives. There are no neutral parties in geopolics. You're either with the western powers, or under the influence of a dictatorship. Or a socialist dictatorship. Or a theocratic dictatorship. Just ask anyone who lives in one which they'd really prefer (There are plenty of refugees that will tell you in most cases).

    7. Re:How ironic... by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1, Interesting

      It's a Canadian court though, so if the spying was done outside the US (and thus almost certainly illegal in the country where it happened) that might help her case.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    8. Re:How ironic... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      1. No evidence is secret to the defense int he US, that is a UK tradition.
      2. The evidence against the executive being extradited from Canada is not secret in general.
      3. Shame on you for defending an ethnostate with dreams of global domination.

    9. Re: How ironic... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      She will be Ok. The Chinese will just arrest a bunch of Americans and Canadians and arrange a swap.
      Would not recommend traveling to China to do business right now.

    10. Re:How ironic... by davmoo · · Score: 1

      My bad. I thought Canada had already decided to extradite her and we were talking about US courts. As you point out, that is not the case. So she may have a genuine chance.

      --
      I want a new quote. One that won't spill. One that don't cost too much. Or come in a pill.
    11. Re: How ironic... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      The US was advocating Europe using European tech providers though.....

      Europe threw Nokia and others under the bus and made it about the US being a bully in order to try to convince people Chinese made tech was ok. Huawei bribed the heck out of people to get that to happen, but it still happened.

      What is seriously shocking from an outsider's prospective is how easy it was to get Europe to turn on itself. Everyone gets it, the US is a bully and don't do business with it, but shooting yourselves in the foot? Really?

      That is Russian level ridiculousness.

    12. Re:How ironic... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Where have you seen US gov pushing Cisco or anything American?

      All I have seen is that US gov continues to say, do not use ZTE or Huawei.

    13. Re: How ironic... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Show us where the US gov knocked Nokia and spoke up for Chinese gear. You can not. Because it was never done.
      Ass wipe.

    14. Re: How ironic... by Highdude702 · · Score: 1

      Dude, are you drunk? Did you actually read what he wrote? I mean I'm high as hell and a little buzzed aiming for drunk... And I still don't get wtf your comment came from.

    15. Re:How ironic... by Highdude702 · · Score: 1

      So you think canada doesn't spy?

    16. Re:How ironic... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nah, man. Canada is too busy extorting money from women that refuse to wax a man's balls to spy on anyone.

    17. Re:How ironic... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Except evidence collected using a FISA warrant is perfectly legal in the US. And in this particular case the target really is Foreign. But not all evidence collected under a FISA warrant can be used against a defendant in a US court. A FISA warrant authorizes the collection of evidence using less stringent rules of admissibility. The evidence collected is used by prosecutors when making an application for a normal warrant. FISA evidence cannot be used in court.

    18. Re: How ironic... by rtb61 · · Score: 1

      Lots of bridges for sale recently. Yes, the US only started spying because everyone else was doing it, yep, uh huh. How will they prove it, why via the IP addresses they spoof, and no search, warrant no problem, now US search warrants work in any country in the world, especially the mystery FISA ones. So evidence that can readily be fabricated, that was claimed to be obtained upon an illegal basis, that supports US global dominance, is well, what it ain't is evidence, just more bullshit. The US governments lies and it lies a whole damn lot and it lies so much now, in full view of everyone it will tell lies, that they know, everyone else knows, is a lie, like it still means something.

      What Russia collusion investigation, never happened, there was no US investigation into Russian collusion, it is all a Russia lie. You know they will start going there, lying about having fabricated an investigation, lying about the sanctions, saying they were for other fabricated reason, lying that sanctions even exist, lying about the weather, whether it is day on night or any other lie they can tell that they believe they can individual profit by.

      --
      Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
    19. Re: How ironic... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Then they came for the Japanese, and I said nothing.
      Then they came for the blacks, and I said nothing.
      Then they came for the Hispanics, and I said nothing.
      Then they came for the Puerto Ricans, and I said nothing.
      Then they came for the Muslims, and I said nothing.
      Then they came for the native Americans, and I said nothing. .....

    20. Re: How ironic... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Last time I checked, the NSA worked for the US government.

    21. Re:How ironic... by KingStannis · · Score: 1

      Fewer.

    22. Re:How ironic... by Kartu · · Score: 1

      I'd prefer being spied by USA rather than China, thank you very much.

    23. Re: How ironic... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Lots of stupid on /. every day, you don't stand out at all.

    24. Re: How ironic... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Let's compare a little shall we?

      USA - Admits they injected pregnant women with plutonium, and that it was wrong.
      USA - Admits they gave black people syphilis, and that it was wrong.
      China - Won't admit they ran over a single protester with a tank.

      The USA for all its flaws at least admits plenty of shit that it did that was wrong. Like any democracy, it isn't perfect, but it's a hell off a lot better than the non-democracy of China.

      So yes, many of us would rather have the U.S. or other democratic countries spying on us than China. They might even catch Chinese companies that are basically just divisions of the Chinese government doing bad shit.

      Now if China actually became a democracy and had a bill of rights worth a damn, then things might be different.

    25. Re:How ironic... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you are a foreign national in another country, you need to follow the laws of that country. If you don't then you may end up in a world of shit. That's how it works.

      Try going to China and try breaking a bunch of laws (with the caveat - no bribing of officials first) and you will find yourself knee deep in poo too. This is not to say that Chinese are inherently bad people or anything like that, they have gotten screwed a lot, but that's pretty common.

      The thing to remember about China is there are a lot of Chinese that are not represented at all in government, and the government is scared of them waking up one day and saying "Enough of this, time for another revolution." Rather than giving those people representation, and letting them vote, they instead destroy any meaningful opposition. Even if that opposition is peaceful, they destroy it.

      To be fair, you see the same thing in plenty of democracies. Look at the USA - There are two main political parties and they both work very hard to make it very difficult for a third party to challenge either of them.
         

    26. Re:How ironic... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      OOps meant to add this - The difference being at least in the USA with the two parties you can vote for the other, and if both the parties sucked too hard too badly then you would hope that people would at least wake up enough to say NO, we are voting for this new party. At which point the two main parties will be motivated to get their shit together - at least temporarily.

  2. SUCK MY BALLS, INDO CHIMP! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You suck, Miss Mash!

  3. Usual Red Scare by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Don't let China spy on you, let us do it instead.

    1. Re: Usual Red Scare by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Says post op sex changed ms mash!

  4. Not so secret by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The implication that anyone might believe that Huawei wasn't under scrutiny, when US citizens with far less import are investigated secretly, is the only interesting component of this non-story.

  5. secret surveillance by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "secret surveillance", or as everyone else calls it "spying"

    1. Re: secret surveillance by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ms Mash, fake news peddler

    2. Re: secret surveillance by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Spying is targetted. Security surveillance is collecting everything possible.

  6. Good, they're owned by the Communist Party. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    China = Totalitarian cabal = Huawei. I'm glad to see such repeatedly bad actors get investigated where it counts, fuck Huawei apologists.

    1. Re: Good, they're owned by the Communist Party. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ms Mash is a homo apologist.

  7. Good. by Jahoda · · Score: 0

    Fuck Huawei.

    1. Re: Good. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But what about flaming transhomo Miss Mash?

    2. Re: Good. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why are you typing this in a closet?

  8. Sense of irony? by jbrown.za · · Score: 1

    While not surprising, clearly they have no sense of irony.

    1. Re:Sense of irony? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're clearly stupid enough to equate legal surveillance on a known/proven bad actor with illegal theft/fraud/spying? Derp much?

    2. Re: Sense of irony? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The US was the actor, not the subject.

    3. Re:Sense of irony? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      legal surveillance

      illegal theft/fraud/spying

      It all depends on your point of view who is guilty.

    4. Re:Sense of irony? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The irony of calling someone stupid when you clearly have no understanding of sovereignty.

    5. Re:Sense of irony? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are you for real?

      By what divine providence is it legal for the U.S. to spy, but not for China?

  9. Re: Equating the two is moronic, not ironic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Trust US, because We said so.

  10. Re: Not so secret msmash closet comeouttance by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Miss Mash, you smelly HOMO!

  11. Re: Hate? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Miss Mash promotes pro homo propaganda.

  12. Re:Hate? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Fuck you Miss Mash!

  13. Re:Hate? by Archtech · · Score: 2

    Damn this whole comment section is filled with pro US anti China propaganda. Da fuck is going on?

    Your tax dollars at work.

    --
    I am sure that there are many other solipsists out there.
  14. Re:Testament of Solomon by Anubis+IV · · Score: 4, Informative

    King Solomon worshiped Satan. Read the book yourself if you don't believe me.

    Meh, I'll bite since this is some creatively "out there" trolling. You seem to be unaware that the book you're referring to, which is fictitiously/falsely attributed to Solomon by its actual author, was written a millennium or more after Solomon's death in a language that didn't even exist at the time of his reign. If you actually read it, you should have noticed the readily apparent Greek influence (e.g. mythological, thematic, and linguistic) that should have been a dead giveaway that it came much later and wasn't something he authored.

    But hey, if you think that book is historically accurate, I've got a few other historical accounts that might interest you and are of similar levels of historicity. They really provide some insight into the period conditions of their respective times and places.

    On the plus side, today I learned a new word from that first link: pseudepigraphical.

  15. Re: Equating the two is moronic, not ironic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How is China not being a free country either an excuse for the fact that the US is not a free country?

  16. Re: Equating the two is moronic, not ironic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The US is not all that free anymore, at least the Chinese people realize they are not free. While in the US, it brainwashes ignorant people then call them patriots. Weren't you for the Patriot Act?

  17. Re: Equating the two is moronic, not ironic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The united states has the largest prison population in the world by a huge margin

  18. Is anyone really surprised? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    After Snowden; is anyone surprised that the US government is constantly conducting secret surveillance? The beauty is that the general sheep population doesn't usually notice the effect.

  19. Re: Hate? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Such an outpouring of hate

  20. Re: Equating the two is moronic, not ironic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Tell that to the muslims in western China, Tibetans, anyone with debt, changes jobs too often, or mentions the Tianamen square massacre.

  21. Re: Equating the two is moronic, not ironic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Every powerful country spies on shit in other countries.
    There is a long history, the USA has been doing it since the end of wwII. Without apology!
    Our allies do it to us too!!!

    If you think this is immoral... maybe you're right. In the 1800s the US actually considered some olde timey versions of the sort of spycraft that started late WWII/ early cold war and became the norm.

    I wish i could provide some direct quotes and names but the general sentiment of our government was that it was "Unamerican, ungentlemanly, etc"
    Quaint; maybe they're right. But it doesn't change the fact they've been doing this for your entire life. Somehow you never picked up on this.

    It surprised me to learn about this too:
    They talked about it on the news. I remember I was 8 in 1985. We were maybe the first people in our neighborhood to have cable tv. I remember.. as an 8 year old boy with ADHD I saw on the news that Jonathan Pollard was spying for israel. I barely knew what israel was.

    But I do remember that they mentioned that they were one of our closest allies and that was weird to me.

    So at 8 years old I had somehow acquired an important bit of information that you have yet to learn.

      I guess the point is that you may be mentally retarded but it doesn't mean you can't have a long and fulfilling life if you learn appropriate coping strategies

  22. Foreign Intelligence Surveillance by AHuxley · · Score: 1

    The US can do domestic collection and the Foreign in Foreign Intelligence Surveillance.
    Multitasking.

    --
    Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
  23. It's legitimate. by Gravis+Zero · · Score: 4, Informative

    The jobs of intelligence agencies is to keep us safe from foreign threats like China. For those who say, "oh how ironic" that is whataboutism because we're talking about China, an aggressive authoritarian nation with an awful humans right record (currently "re-educating" a million+ Muslims). If you are reading this then your country is likely either the US itself or a close ally of the US. Between trusting an ally and bellicose nation bent on expanding it's power at any cost, I will always opt for an ally.

    --
    Anons need not reply. Questions end with a question mark.
    1. Re:It's legitimate. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      because we're talking about America, an aggressive authoritarian nation with an awful humans right record (currently "re-educating" a million+ native Americans).

      FTFY
      C'mon Gravis Zero, you got to admit at least the Chinese Muslims are not being removed from their land and genocided like the native Americans.

    2. Re: It's legitimate. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      an aggressive authoritarian nation with an awful humans right record

      So your argument is essentially that China and the USA are very much alike?

    3. Re: It's legitimate. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So your argument is essentially that China and the USA are very much alike?

      Be as cynical as you like, you have the freedom to do that in the USA. In China, not so much. Remember that next time before biting the hand that feeds you.

    4. Re: It's legitimate. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Exactly. The USA and its allies has admitted plenty of terrible shit they did wrong. China can't even admit they had a protest in Tienanmen square. The USA and its allies isn't perfect but it's way better than China.

    5. Re:It's legitimate. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The feck you talking about Genocide.
      There wouldn't be any of these defeated so called "Natives" if genocide had taken place.
      Take your Victims point and sh8v'em where the tepee don't shine!

    6. Re:It's legitimate. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      'currently "re-educating" a million+ Muslims'. As opposed to what? Bombing them or outright killing them? Giving them dysentery and disease like vibrio?

      Sorry but if I were Muslim, I would rather take the re-educating rather than the bombs. Perhaps that's why other Muslim countries doesn't seem to give a shit about what's happening in Xinjiang. But all of the sudden the American version of the 50 cent club will cite how unfairly China is treating Muslims, while not even discussing how American policies affect Muslims around the world in a much worse fashion.

      The only true bellicose country has been America, which has started more wars since the fall of Communism than any other country.

    7. Re:It's legitimate. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Americans have no right to point out "awful humans right record", even more if you decide to use violence against Muslims as example.
      Stop bombing, mass murdering and torturing Muslims and then come back.
      Or do you think American human rights record is great because you only murder and torture outside your borders? Guantanamo, extraordinary rendition, wars about fake WMD, contributing to the Saudis bombings in Yemen is all you.

    8. Re:It's legitimate. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The feck you talking about Genocide.

      yeah fuck you Gravis Zero (I know it's you chicken shit posting AC).
      There's like a hundred links with the label "genocide" in the wiki article.

    9. Re:It's legitimate. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Atcually some of us are citizens of a country thats being wooed by both sides.

      And infrastructure wise, usa is losing at least in my region.

      Netflix is still a great influence tho. So is GoT.

  24. It's not that great. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We have the largest official prison population. But don't believe these brags.. our secret prison program is decades behind other countries!!!

    Sadly our secret prisons have been curtailed by libtards and other haters of freedom.
    I missed the opportunity to invest in our private prison system at the ground floor. Now all the libtards are crying about civil rights and who knows what else!!! Stick a fork in it mortimer!!
    LIEberuls don't know a good thing when they see it. The private prison system has all the hallmarks of a REIT except with the sort of fixed pricing you're only going to get from uncompetitive defense contracts. It's not even a win-win. It's more like a 10 foot solid gold participation trophy for anyone smart and hard working enough to see the money. Maybe we'd get more millennials on board if I described the dividends as a participation trophy for prison activism!

    But hopefully we can get a private dark site prison system going. I won't miss that bus twice I'll tell you that! The best part is that when the prisons are secret we won't have a bunch of bleeding hearts crying to death every time someone gets their ass beat in handcuffs. It's prison! There's handcuffs!! If we make it nice how will they learn?

    Anyhow hopefully trump will make good on his plans to bring back torture but it's soundling like the demon-creeps might have been right; He's simply too stupid to execute any of his promises because he doesn't understand shit.
    Oh well a broken clock is right twice a day.... unless you're in a dark site prison.. they make sure prisoners can't tell the time. (Side benefit: at least 1000 dollars in timekeeping related savings per black site!)

    1. Re:It's not that great. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Grow up, little boy.

  25. Re: How ball sucking.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Msmash is the best we've got at this point.
    Don't fuck with msmash

  26. USA Intelligence doesn't aid US companies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    USA Intelligence doesn't aid US companies, unlike Chinese, France, Russian, Indian, Pakistani, Israeli, and most other countries intelligence services.

    USA companies can sue the USGovt and often actually win their cases to NOT be forced to hand over personal data when they feel the request isn't specific enough or is outside US jurisdiction.

    Have you ever, ever, ever, heard of a Chinese or Russian company doing the same? Hint. Nope.

    When analysts in the USGovt intelligence services make a claim, outside any political pressures (which they wouldn't know about) unlike Colin Powell, I'd trust it.

    We know the NSA hacked into Huawei over the last few years. It has been reported by multiple, reputable, news outlets.

    What does that show us? That the US is good at hacking? Well, not really. It shows that Huawei is terrible at security, which is a very important consideration for any network infrastructure. It also means that the NSA was able to see internal documents on the Huawei corporate network which stated their policies and ongoing Chinese Govt requests for information world-wide. Over 20 Huawei employees have been caught performing espionage around the world. Sure, they have a corporate policy against this, but the Chinese govt has placed people inside Huawei in key roles to have access with overseas technology companies either as potential clients or on projects where they work together, cough, and steal the other companies ideas.

    Huawei needs to be thrown out of all countries where fair competition is the rule.

    Why is Huawei equipment so cheap? Because they have 20 yrs of technical debt and crap code. The UK audit of their code clearly showed that. What do they say? "Fast, Cheap, Good. Pick any 2."

    Hint, with Huawei, you cannot pick "good."

    1. Re:USA Intelligence doesn't aid US companies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Huawei needs to be thrown out of all countries where fair competition is the rule.

      So your saying Huawei can stay in the USA.
      there is no fair competition in the USA, maybe it is the rule, but as fact it is not fair in competition.
      i.e. government payments to companies as they are "too big to fail"
      i.e. companies not paying their fair share of taxes.
      i.e. companies involved in lobbying for protection while making huge political donations (bribery and corruption in my books).

    2. Re: USA Intelligence doesn't aid US companies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You seriously believe this, despite all US government documents stating otherwise and all of the diplomatic blackmailing the US uses to further the interests of its companies? That is very cute, but also incredibly naive.

    3. Re:USA Intelligence doesn't aid US companies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hint, with USA, you cannot pick "Fast, Cheap or Good."

      FTFY

  27. Re: Equating the two is moronic, not ironic by Highdude702 · · Score: 1

    What if. All of these china shill posts are actual chinese citizens trying to boost their social credit score.... I mean, its plausible.

  28. What makes them different from your side? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Nobody here ever said seriously that China's hand in Huawei 's ass is great.
    The point, which you wind like an eel to get out of, is that YOU are exactly like, if not worse than that.

    Get this into your thick skull: THERE IS NO EITHER/OR! THERE IA NO VERSUS! *BOTH* SIDEA ARE EVIL AND WRONG! (And so alike, that in my book, they are the same side: Our sworn enemies.)

    This very article proves that.
    Th NSA leaks are cold hard proof of that.
    China spies, USA spies, same assholes.
    Huawei, Cisco, same hand puppets.
    And you're just a talking head hand puppet too. (Nobody cares for which "side".)

  29. Yeah, "legal". Not *right*! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In Pakistan, "freedom fighters" means the Taliban, and "terrorists" means the USA.

    Just because that's their definition, doesn't make it right, does it?

    You can write evil crimes into laws all you want, and act like law is what's right and wrong. But it's still gonna stay being evil crimes.

    Spying is an evil crime. Period.
    In fact, the whole concept of acting like it is OK to harm somebody because they did something that you consider harmful to you, and acting like that somehow makes you not the same, is *crazy fucked-up*, immature, childish, troglodyte-level primitive, idiotic and just plain retarded.
    It is *precisely* what Jesus, Ghandi and the Dalai Lama teach to not do. Along with pretty much every other moral guide ever.

    Yet it is the foundation of your law.

    If that doesn't say it all for you, then you cannot be helped.

    1. Re: Yeah, "legal". Not *right*! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      Just because that's their definition, doesn't make it right, does it?

      In this case it is also the UN definition, so they are quite right.

  30. Seconded. NSA trolls woring overtime. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's so obvious because they all parrot the same stupid bullet points and strawman attacks with only slightly changed wording.
    Sometimes the wording even is exactly the same!

    Always acting like being against the NSA means being pro China and against the USA. When reality is closer to the opposite.

    (Seriously, if you are pro NSA, then you hate America and want it to be like China.
    No way around that fact.)

  31. It LITERALLY says it does in the leaks! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have read the leaks, dear NSA hand puppet.

    It literally says that the NSA aided the US industry and worked in their interests! So much that it was a big fraction of their entire work!

    You must be truly panicking, to grasp at such desperate over-exaggerated straws. lol

  32. US spies on Huawei .. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    US spies on Huawei, then accuses Huawei of spying on US. I do believe the motivation for this kind of prosecution is to punish Huawei for not letting the NSA put back-doors into its equipment, as all the rest have done. Yes I mean you Microsoft. All that telemetry going back to the Utah Data Center purely to enhance the user experience ;]

  33. The jobs of intelligence agencies? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The jobs of intelligence agencies is to spy on its own people just in case they become a threat to their owners ;]

    Gravis Zero: "The jobs of intelligence agencies is to keep us safe from foreign threats like China. For those who say, "oh how ironic" that is whataboutism because we're talking about China, an aggressive authoritarian nation with an awful humans right record (currently "re-educating" a million+ Muslims). If you are reading this then your country is likely either the US itself or a close ally of the US. Between trusting an ally and bellicose nation bent on expanding it's power at any cost, I will always opt for an ally.

  34. Europe threw Nokia and others under the bus? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Anonymous: "Europe threw Nokia and others under the bus and made it about the US being a bully in order to try to convince people Chinese made tech was ok. Huawei bribed the heck out of people to get that to happen, but it still happened.

    What are you on about, do you mind providing some background and verifiable citation for the above statements?

    a. Microsoft bought Nokia in order to leverage its way into the mobile market. A series of missteps and not even Microsoft's deep pockets could persuade people to use Windows Mobile. Microsoft a currently reduced to taxing android handset makers.

    1. Re: Europe threw Nokia and others under the bus? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Microsoft did not buy Nokia. They bought the phone division. Nokia is still an independent public company.

  35. Re: Equating the two is moronic, not ironic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Tell that to American Muslims after 9/11. Tell that to black people in the US, so used to be slaves, and are even disadvantaged today. And the Hispanics, descendents of the Maya, Inca, etc. And don't even get me started about the native Americans.

    Yes, do try to help the Uighurs and Tibetans in China. That's noble. But don't forget to look in the mirror sometimes, too.

    There are people in your own country who need help, too.

  36. Re: Equating the two is moronic, not ironic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You need over 9000 social score to get over the firewall

  37. Fuck you, America. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Fuck you, America. This is why nobody likes you, nobody takes you seriously and everyone wants you dead. Just fuck off. The rest of the world will get by just fine without you.

  38. Re: Equating the two is moronic, not ironic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Tell that to American Muslims after 9/11. Tell that to black people in the US, so used to be slaves, and are even disadvantaged today. And the Hispanics, descendents of the Maya, Inca, etc. And don't even get me started about the native Americans.

    Yes, do try to help the Uighurs and Tibetans in China. That's noble. But don't forget to look in the mirror sometimes, too.

    There are people in your own country who need help, too.

    Oh you are so righteous and so full of bullshit.......

  39. Re:Testament of Solomon by propheth · · Score: 1

    I see the Prophet Solomon's (PBUH) name being brought up and falsely attributed to something which people have no knowledge about. Just to clear it up, this is the whole truth and nothing else. And when there cometh unto them a messenger from Allah, confirming that which they possess, a party of those who have received the Scripture fling the Scripture of Allah behind their backs as if they knew not, - Quran 2:101 And follow that which the devils falsely related against the kingdom of Solomon. Solomon disbelieved not; but the devils disbelieved, teaching mankind magic and that which was revealed to the two angels in Babel, Harut and Marut. Nor did they (the two angels) teach it to anyone till they had said: We are only a temptation, therefore disbelieve not (in the guidance of Allah). And from these two (angles) people learn that by which they cause division between man and wife; but they injure thereby no-one save by Allah's leave. And they learn that which harmeth them and profiteth them not. And surely they do know that he who trafficketh therein will have no (happy) portion in the Hereafter; and surely evil is the price for which they sell their souls, if they but knew. ~ Quran 2:102

  40. Re:Testament of Solomon by propheth · · Score: 1

    I see the Prophet Solomon's (PBUH) name being brought up and falsely attributed to something which people have no knowledge about. Solomon never worshiped satan. Just to clear it up, this is the whole truth and nothing else.

    And when there cometh unto them a messenger from Allah, confirming that which they possess, a party of those who have received the Scripture fling the Scripture of Allah behind their backs as if they knew not, - Quran 2:101

    And follow that which the devils falsely related against the kingdom of Solomon. Solomon disbelieved not; but the devils disbelieved, teaching mankind magic and that which was revealed to the two angels in Babel, Harut and Marut. Nor did they (the two angels) teach it to anyone till they had said: We are only a temptation, therefore disbelieve not (in the guidance of Allah). And from these two (angles) people learn that by which they cause division between man and wife; but they injure thereby no-one save by Allah's leave. And they learn that which harmeth them and profiteth them not. And surely they do know that he who trafficketh therein will have no (happy) portion in the Hereafter; and surely evil is the price for which they sell their souls, if they but knew. ~ Quran 2:102

  41. Re: Equating the two is moronic, not ironic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Tell hay to the Jews who were slaughtered and enslaved in World War II. Every race has been slave owners and slaves so STFU with your selective outrage.

  42. Naive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We're all one happy Global Family now right?
    Too many people seem to forget we're in competition with other Nations.
    Too many people seem ready to bend over in the Spirit of acceptance when the competition doesn't reciprocate one bit.
    Effing hippies suck in any generation.

  43. Absurd by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I don't see the point of this; we are (and have been, trust me) actively spying on each other for a long time. This only serves as a PR campaign.

    And DUH, of course we're going to protect our national interests by doing so, why is this so shocking?

    The US has long since known about China's activities, logic bombs and other methods they've been using to penetrate our infrastructure. It, among many other reasons and other countries, is why DoD makes their own chips for sensitive operations.

    Huawei is guilty as guilt can be -- but you'll never find out details; that is, until a public research entity decides to continue exposing their methods.

  44. WindBourne quick tell us how US is the good guy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's only bad when someone else does it.

  45. That's WindBourne level retarded by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The US fucking INVADES countries to support their companies.
    What rock have you been living under?

  46. Re: Equating the two is moronic, not ironic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    False:China does.
    Go look at their social credit rating system.

    Lack of freedom, is a prison. Physical bars merely make it a physical prison. Social bars, make it a psychological one.