Slashdot Mirror
'Dead Corals Don't Make Babies': Great Barrier Reef Losing Its Ability To Recover From Bleaching (cnn.com)
An anonymous reader quotes a report from CNN: Successive ocean heat waves are not only damaging Australia's Great Barrier Reef, they are compromising its ability to recover, raising the risk of "widespread ecological collapse," a new study has found. The 2,300-kilometer-long (1,500 mile) reef has endured multiple large-scale "bleaching" events caused by above-average water temperatures in the last two decades, including back-to-back occurrences in 2016 and 2017.
The new study, released Wednesday in the journal Nature, examined the number of adult corals which survived these two events and how many new corals they created to replenish the reef in 2018.
The answer was as bleak as it was stark: "Dead corals don't make babies," the study's lead author, Terry Hughes, said in a press release. Scientists working on the study found the loss in adult corals caused a "crash in coral replenishment" on the reef, as heat stresses brought about by warming ocean temperatures impacted the ability of coral to heal. "The number of new corals settling on the Great Barrier Reef declined by 89% following the unprecedented loss of adult corals from global warming in 2016 and 2017," said Hughes. Scientists working on the report say they would expect coral recruitment to recover over the next 5 to 10 years, as more corals reach sexual maturity, but only in the absence of another bleaching event. However, with sea temperatures continuing to rise this seems a near-impossiblity.
The answer was as bleak as it was stark: "Dead corals don't make babies," the study's lead author, Terry Hughes, said in a press release. Scientists working on the study found the loss in adult corals caused a "crash in coral replenishment" on the reef, as heat stresses brought about by warming ocean temperatures impacted the ability of coral to heal. "The number of new corals settling on the Great Barrier Reef declined by 89% following the unprecedented loss of adult corals from global warming in 2016 and 2017," said Hughes. Scientists working on the report say they would expect coral recruitment to recover over the next 5 to 10 years, as more corals reach sexual maturity, but only in the absence of another bleaching event. However, with sea temperatures continuing to rise this seems a near-impossiblity.
" if you got your stories straight. " = Yes, every scientist in the world needs to get their data to align in marching lock step, like Fox News does. There has to be a choral unison of agreement, in all niches. Great point, moron.
Corals have been around for 500 million years and countles cycles of warming and cooling cycles during that time.
Every prior warming and cooling cycle has happened over thousands of years which gave species the chance to adapt via genetic mutation over multiple generations. What makes this one so different is that this has happened in mere decades which has left no time for adaptation to occur.
Anons need not reply. Questions end with a question mark.
Please enlighten everyone about what happened to the corals in the Great Barrier Reed during the Medieval Warm Period. It was quite warm then, too, yet we still have plenty of corals today.
The Medieval Warm Period was a similar temperatures in the 1980s. It's gotten a lot warmer since then.
Anons need not reply. Questions end with a question mark.
Interesting - you should do a bit of googling before you mention a period that was global cooler than present. There are a few papers specifically looking at the south pacific, and specifically the east coast of Australia during that period of time. It was cooler and dryer than present during the Medieval warm period. It kind of corresponds to a prolonged La-Nina period.
Well, 500 million might be a bit too much, but yes. Temperatures leaves traceable changes.
For example clam shells have temperature dependent rings much like trees.
So by digging up and comparing clam shells from a specific time you can get a rough idea of temperature changes.
But there are thousands of different ways so it is a lot of work to get accurate temperature estimations.
It's interesting how the frequency of news articles about environmental disasters seems to be increasing. Is this just because people are more interested in these stories nowadays or is the planet plunging itself in the deep pit of irreversible warming, becoming more unihabitable for people every day?
-- Cheers!
I wouldn't trust AOC to give me the time of day after she claimed all of her constituents were illegal aliens.
On climate change, I'm convinced she watched Al Gore's videos from the late 1990s and then took a bunch of LSD.
In other news, when did scientists stop believing in evolution? Climate has always changed, with great die-offs of species that aren't well adapted to the new climate, but some individuals due to genetic mutation survive and end up colonizing the new climate.
So while 99% of coral right now might not be able to withstand the higher temperatures, the large number of coral individuals almost guarantees that a new form of coral will arise that *can* withstand the higher temperatures.
The same thing happens with silly human cultures. Kill off the stupid humans who think living by the seashore under an elevation of 300 meters is a good idea, and humans living inland will gain in political strength and build a new culture. There is no need to panic over climate change at all.
SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.