Slashdot Mirror


Airbnb Guest Found Hidden Surveillance Camera By Scanning Wi-Fi Network (arstechnica.com)

An anonymous reader quotes a report from Ars Technica: A New Zealand family that booked an Airbnb in Ireland recently discovered an undisclosed camera in the living room, and the family says that Airbnb initially cleared the host of any wrongdoing before finally banning the offender from its platform. "Once the family had unpacked, Andrew Barker, who works in IT security, scanned the house's Wi-Fi network," CNN reported today. "The scan unearthed a camera and subsequently a live feed. From the angle of the video, the family tracked down the camera, concealed in what appeared to be a smoke alarm or carbon monoxide detector." Nealie Barker posted an image on Facebook showing the location of the camera in the living room and a shot of the family from the sneaky video feed.

Based on the photo, the video of the Barkers seems to have been taken on March 3 and was viewable on the local Wi-Fi network at 192.168.0.4/video/livemb.asp. The family relocated to a hotel and contacted both Airbnb and the property host. The host initially hung up but later called back and told them, "The camera in the living room was the only one in the house," CNN wrote. It's not clear whether the host was recording the video, whether he was capturing audio, whether he was monitoring it remotely in real time, or whether he was using it for anything more than monitoring guests. [...] Airbnb temporarily suspended the listing and promised to investigate, CNN wrote. But when Barker contacted Airbnb again two weeks later, "the company told her that the host had been 'exonerated,' and the listing reinstated." Airbnb finally banned the host after Nealie Barker posted about the disturbing incident on Facebook on Monday this week. Barker's Facebook post said that Airbnb's "investigation which didn't include any follow-up with us exonerated the host, no explanation provided," and that "the listing (with hidden camera not mentioned) is still on Airbnb."
Airbnb said in a statement to Ars Technica: "Our original handling of this incident did not meet the high standards we set for ourselves, and we have apologized to the family and fully refunded their stay."

Airbnb's policy states that hosts must disclose "any type of surveillance device" in listings, "even if it's not turned on or hooked up." Cameras are allowed in certain spaces if they are disclosed, but Airbnb "prohibit[s] any surveillance devices that are in or that observe the interior of certain private spaces (such as bedrooms and bathrooms) regardless of whether they've been disclosed. [...] If a host discloses the device after booking, Airbnb will allow the guest to cancel the reservation and receive a refund. Host cancellation penalties may apply."

8 of 99 comments (clear)

  1. Stuff vs Privacy by KalvinB · · Score: 4, Informative

    When "hosts" leave a bunch of valuable stuff around for their "guests" it's little wonder they care more about protecting their crap than the privacy of the guests.

    Stop renting out space that has your stuff in it.

    Nothing of value should be in the property, everything should be documented and have proper insurance.

    1. Re:Stuff vs Privacy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Airbnb wasn't supposed to be about renting entire spaces. it was meant to be for renting rooms in homes. i.e. you were home to keep things 'safe'. Legislators need to get their shit together and simply rule that renting entire apartments/houses for individual nights means 'hotel' subject to all the local and higher levels of regulation that that involves. Get it back to what it was meant for - stop causing damage to others through the use of a fancy name and a web app to hide your activities. Man up that if you're running a damn business, follow the rules.

    2. Re:Stuff vs Privacy by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 4, Informative

      Stop renting out space that has your stuff in it.

      Or learn to do a cost-benefit analysis. I have been an Airbnb host for 6 years and the worst that has happened is a few broken wine glasses and a stained towel. Since I had bought them at Walmart, total replacement cost was about $20.

      A single bad review can cost me 100 times that in lost bookings.

      Broken/stolen/damaged items are a non-problem.

      everything should be documented and have proper insurance.

      Insurance is to cover unaffordable expenses such as legal liability. Only an idiot would buy insurance for kitchen utensils or a TV from Costco.

    3. Re:Stuff vs Privacy by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 4, Informative

      Is there a home insurance which covers Airbnb guests?

      Yes. It is about three times the cost of normal homeowner's insurance. But it is mostly targeted toward dumb people, since Airbnb provides $1M in liability insurance during bookings.

      It wouldn't surprise me if home insurance companies routinely search for properties they insure on Airbnb

      They don't bother since they can just refuse to pay the claim, since the homeowner violated the terms.

    4. Re:Stuff vs Privacy by sjames · · Score: 5, Informative

      Not quite. Hotels may have cameras in the parts you're not renting (the public spaces), such as the lobby and dining room. If you're renting the whole house, then the whole house is the private space.

  2. Well sure by rmdingler · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Homeowners probably read this article or any number of equally disturbing disaster rentals.

    Googling "AirBnB renters trash house" gets similar results as typing in "Florida Man" and a random date.

    --
    Happiness in intelligent people is the rarest thing I know.

    Ernest Hemingway

  3. Re: Several days old story. by bobby · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Yup, very sad. I also blame things like the mod system. I don't quite understand why I can't mod if I post.

    They should give some of us (who want to be positive and contribute) a great deal of mod power / points to quickly clean up the site.

    Keep track of who mods who and what and block abusers; but otherwise clean up this site.

  4. Re: Several days old story. by Kernel+Kurtz · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I don't quite understand why I can't mod if I post.

    That is quite why enough.