Slashdot Mirror


Former Senate Staffer Admits To Doxxing Five Senators On Wikipedia (theverge.com)

Jackson Cosko, a former employee of Senator Maggie Hassan, has "admitted to breaking into Hassan's office after being fired, stealing data that included personal contact information, then posting that information online during Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh's confirmation hearing," reports The Verge. The report says Cosko added several senators' private phone numbers and addresses to Wikipedia. He has pleaded guilty to computer fraud, witness tampering, obstruction of justice, and making restricted personal information public. From the report: Cosko worked as a computer system administrator for Hassan, but he was fired in May of 2018. According to a plea agreement, he retaliated by using another employee's key to break into his old workplace at least four times, installing keyloggers on computers and using stolen login credentials to download gigabytes of data. While watching the Supreme Court confirmation hearing in September, Cosko "became angry" at Republican senators questioning Kavanaugh -- so he posted contact information for Senators Lindsey Graham, Mike Lee, and Orrin Hatch on Wikipedia. Cosko was interning for US Representative Sheila Jackson Lee at the time, and his changes were flagged by a bot that detects Wikipedia edits from congressional computers. The bot inadvertently helped spread the senators' information across Twitter, a process that prosecutors say Cosko aided by tweeting about his leaks.

Cosko struck again a few days later, posting information about Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell and Senator Rand Paul -- who had called for an investigation -- on Wikipedia. He added comments calling himself a "golden god" who had a legal right to post the information, asking readers to "send us bitcoins." When a witness spotted him in Hassan's office the next day, Cosko responded with a threatening email titled "I own EVERYTHING." Cosko claimed he would release private emails, encrypted messages, and the health data and social security numbers for senators' children. "If you tell anyone I will leak it all," he wrote. Cosko was arrested soon after.
Attorneys say Cosko could serve up to 57 months in prison, and he's required to give up all the equipment used in the crimes.

91 comments

  1. Oof by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Yikes

    1. Re: Oof by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I guess the editors are getting tired of the criticism

    2. Re: Oof by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      *Costco, not Cosko.

  2. Under lock and key by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I wonder how many others are ready to go rogue?

  3. Slap on the wrist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    He's part of the revolutionary socialist democrat movement. It will be reduced, and definitely pardoned by a Democrat POTUS to "send a message" that authoritarianism won't be stopped, and don't you forget it!

    1. Re: Slap on the wrist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A card carrying party member.

      However, maybe the time will come when a democrat leader decides to have him shot.

    2. Re: Slap on the wrist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not sure if stupid or trolling. Or both.

      Don't be daft. These aren't the times...

    3. Re:Slap on the wrist by taustin · · Score: 2

      That does seem likely. But the way things look right now, with a 57 month sentence, he'll have been about at 20 years before the Democrats regain the White House. Maybe 200 years.

    4. Re:Slap on the wrist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oppps is that a lead bullet in his head ?

    5. Re:Slap on the wrist by thrich81 · · Score: 3, Informative

      History lessons for those not around to remember:
      After the mass pardons by G H Bush of all the Reagan Iran-Contra criminals in '92, Republicans have no grounds to criticize any pardons done by Democrats.
      And it was Republican Gerald Ford who pardoned his Republican predecessor in '74 even before charges were brought, "a full, free, and absolute pardon unto Richard Nixon for all offenses against the United States which he, Richard Nixon, has committed or may have committed or taken part in during the period from January 20, 1969 through August 9,1974."
      The Republicans have been far more shameless in using the pardon to clear their cronies of crimes committed while in actual government positions.
      By the way, the Attorney General at the time who advised Bush on the Iran-Contra pardons was our current AG, William Barr, handpicked by Trump to take over the Justice Department now...

    6. Re:Slap on the wrist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      Its puzzling to me how far detached from reality some of the far right are. If you take a look at democratic pardons you'll notice they aren't of political cronies, on the other hand if we look at Donald Trump he's only been in power a couple years and he's already done a number of politically motivated pardons (Arpaio, Scooter Libby, D'Souza), heck if we look at the past the most egregious cronyism pardon was Ford pardoning Nixon.

    7. Re:Slap on the wrist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Informative

      Are you out of your mind. Clinton took money for pardoning a convicted fucking child rapist. Fucking marxist dolt.

    8. Re:Slap on the wrist by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 2

      This is pure whataboutism. It in no way addresses or refutes the topic. Try again.

      --
      Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
    9. Re:Slap on the wrist by thrich81 · · Score: 2

      I'll give you that one, actually both -- whataboutism and not really germane to the topic of the original submission. I shouldn't have let myself be set off by a stupid AC comment in the first place, which is down to -1 now, I see.

    10. Re: Slap on the wrist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Doxxing == crime ???
      WTF ??

    11. Re:Slap on the wrist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      After the mass pardons by G H Bush of all the Reagan Iran-Contra criminals in '92, Republicans have no grounds to criticize any pardons done by Democrats.

      Group judgement for individual action is not wise, not reasonable, and not just. It's why any sort of bigotry is bad.

      Classism, sexism, racism, tribalism all are bad for the same reason; don't judge everyone in a given group for the actions of individuals within that group.

    12. Re: Slap on the wrist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Was he in the Republican or Democratic Party?

    13. Re:Slap on the wrist by reboot246 · · Score: 2

      Just Democrats being Democrats. It's what they do.

    14. Re: Slap on the wrist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well if their prosecution was politically motivated.... then it was the right thing to do. Or do you think your team never sends anyone up the river simply out of partisan interests? (Yes I know Dsouza actually did the crime... a crime that Democrats skate on constantly.)

    15. Re:Slap on the wrist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      TL DR:
      Animals can't grow out of their primitive behaviour patterns. There is almost 100% chance different animal will behave the same as the others before it.

    16. Re: Slap on the wrist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sir Bradley Manning is a registered Democrat, who ran as a Democrat for the Senate.

      They didn't vote for him, however, with polls indicating that a man who mutilated his penis, takes hormone pills, and pretends to be a woman wasn't crazy enough for Democrats to identify with.

    17. Re: Slap on the wrist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's OK to be white.

    18. Re:Slap on the wrist by elrous0 · · Score: 1

      You're the one who's pretty "detached from reality" if you think there is any partisan divide between politicians being corrupt self-interested scumbags.

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    19. Re:Slap on the wrist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      and definitely pardoned by a Democrat POTUS

      So, potentially decades in prison before that happens.

    20. Re: Slap on the wrist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Next time just lose the part about dem versus rep. Your original comment is very useful and brings to light something that others often don't remember. People throw around things like "Trump is a traitor" or "Obama is a traitor". What they seem to forget is that Reagan actually was a traitor by constitutional definition for aiding the enemy with Contra against Congress.

    21. Re:Slap on the wrist by tomhath · · Score: 1

      If you take a look at democratic pardons you'll notice they aren't of political cronies

      Nonsense. Take a look at Clinton's Pardongate controversy.

    22. Re:Slap on the wrist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What on earth has Clinton, a center-right politician, got to do with Marxism?

    23. Re:Slap on the wrist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A Democrat pardoned Marc Rich (whose wife got lots of donations):

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bill_Clinton_pardon_controversy

      And even many Democrats now believe Ford pardoning Nixon was better for the country, overall.

  4. The Golden God! by TrekkieGod · · Score: 1

    He is untethered, and his rage knows no bounds!

    --

    Warning: Opinions known to be heavily biased.

    1. Re: The Golden God! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I heard he used host files by apk.

  5. Wikipedia is a mess already by Jarwulf · · Score: 2

    The political sections of Wikipedia are already a joke, even compared to a few years ago. The current popular game is to fish Google for negative references or bylines to a (usually conservative) person or organization the editor doesn't like and then use it to frontload the beginning of their article with negative information. Then the change is etched in stone because it came from the 'reliable' NYT its automatically the consensus no matter how obscure or widespread it is.

  6. Well, golly! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Where's the Democrat party jackass icon on this story's banner? [no, I'm not using an expletive, the Democrat party mascot is officially a jackass]

    This jerk was a Democrat staffer for Democrat "super delegate" turned United States Senator Hassan.

    For all you Bernie supporters: this jerk was a loyal supporter of one of the Hillary people who did their best to steal the 2016 primary for Hillary - the ethics is not strong with this one [and this one's boss, of course].

    1. Re: Well, golly! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Should we judge everyone by who they happened to be indirectly linked to? It's one shit head who happened to do shit stuff. Calm down and take your meds.

    2. Re:Well, golly! by ChrisMaple · · Score: 1

      Too bad Hassan can't share Cosko's cell. Both senators from New Hampshire are villains.

      --
      Contribute to civilization: ari.aynrand.org/donate
  7. No mention of party -- must be a Democrat then by drnb · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Hmm ... no mention of the political party he and his senator are members of. They must be democrats then. If they were Republicans the media and summaries would surely be pointing that out.

    1. Re:No mention of party -- must be a Democrat then by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hmm ... no mention of the political party he and his senator are members of. They must be democrats then. If they were Republicans the media and summaries would surely be pointing that out.

      Yep, there would be (R)s all over the place in that case. Funny how they don't think that we notice.

    2. Re:No mention of party -- must be a Democrat then by yorgasor · · Score: 4, Informative

      It doesn't mention that Sheila Jackson Lee was a Democratic Congresswoman, only that she was a US Representative. I've never heard of her before, so I certainly wouldn't know which political party she belonged to just by seeing her name, and I'm sure I'm not the only one.

      --
      Looking for a computer support specialist for your small business? Check out
    3. Re: No mention of party -- must be a Democrat then by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I recommend looking her up. I hear that her staff turnover rate is really high. She's a real piece of work.

      https://www.chron.com/news/politics/article/Washingtonian-gives-Rep-Sheila-Jackson-Lee-5812890.php

      She had some interesting thoughts on North and South Vietnam.

      https://youtu.be/XK3rTUgoQD4

      "The absurd becomes more absurd the more you hear it and that's absolutely absurd."

    4. Re:No mention of party -- must be a Democrat then by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Lol what a brain dead commie cuck. The word "democratic" doesn't appear in the summary you useful idiot dipshit.

    5. Re:No mention of party -- must be a Democrat then by LynnwoodRooster · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Cosko was interning for US Representative Sheila Jackson Lee at the time

      Nope, nothing about Democrat in there! In fact, the only mention of political party is:

      While watching the Supreme Court confirmation hearing in September, Cosko "became angry" at Republican senators questioning Kavanaugh

      Was he upset because they were too harsh, because he was an uber-conservative?

      The summary goes a LONG way to not mention Democrat (even though Cosko worked for two of them) and only mention Republican where it could be assumed they were the cause of all the issues...

      --
      Browsing at +1 - no ACs, I ignore their posts. So refreshing!
    6. Re:No mention of party -- must be a Democrat then by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Cosko was interning for US Representative Sheila Jackson Lee at the time

      Nope, nothing about Democrat in there! In fact, the only mention of political party is:

      While watching the Supreme Court confirmation hearing in September, Cosko "became angry" at Republican senators questioning Kavanaugh

      Was he upset because they were too harsh, because he was an uber-conservative?

      The summary goes a LONG way to not mention Democrat (even though Cosko worked for two of them) and only mention Republican where it could be assumed they were the cause of all the issues...

      What the hell are you complaining about?

    7. Re:No mention of party -- must be a Democrat then by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hmm ... no mention of the political party he and his senator are members of. They must be democrats then. If they were Republicans the media and summaries would surely be pointing that out.

      Congratulations, you found the left wing Slashdot conspiracy, you so intelligent.

    8. Re: No mention of party -- must be a Democrat then by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      First, it's the Verge! Not your boogieman; "the media". Second, they are reporting on his plea which rightfully doesn't mention party affiliation, because this is beyond party lines...

      They actually don't mention any party affiliation for any members; except to point out that his specific targets listed in the plea were all Republicans (who were actually not following the party line at that moment). I guess they could have mentioned that he also committed crimes against a Democratic office? But why does that matter?

      Why are you guys so focused on the boss via affiliation (who already fired him) rather than his criminal deeds. BTW, welcome to your confirmation bias.

    9. Re: No mention of party -- must be a Democrat then by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I blame Donald Trump for this.

    10. Re:No mention of party -- must be a Democrat then by argStyopa · · Score: 1

      Precisely.

      If "Cosko "became angry" at Republican senators questioning Kavanaugh -- so he posted contact information for Senators Lindsey Graham, Mike Lee, and Orrin Hatch " (all Republicans) didn't convince you, then a quick check of Wiki would confirm:

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...
      Maggie Hassan is a democrat.

      --
      -Styopa
    11. Re: No mention of party -- must be a Democrat then by TimMD909 · · Score: 1
    12. Re:No mention of party -- must be a Democrat then by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Even the snippet in the post here said he worked for Sheila Jackson Lee - a racist Democrat out of Texas - with the intelligence of a potato.

      Apologies to /. potato readers

    13. Re:No mention of party -- must be a Democrat then by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Of course they were Democrats. It said right in the article that the guy was immoral and they fired him. If they were Republicans then he'd be heading up a major agency by now.

    14. Re:No mention of party -- must be a Democrat then by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It doesn't mention that Sheila Jackson Lee was a Democratic Congresswoman, only that she was a US Representative. I've never heard of her before, so I certainly wouldn't know which political party she belonged to just by seeing her name, and I'm sure I'm not the only one.

      So you are not even familiar with the party affiliations of any of the named senators... going to assume you also didn't follow the Kavanaugh hearing, and don't know anything else about any senator's positions on any policy, they are just R and D, and unknown in this case.

      I mean he obviously had an axe to grind against some Republicans involved in the Kavanaugh hearings, that part right there in the summary tells you everything you wanted to know about which way his dick leans. If you need R and D spelled out for you every time, you aren't following politics very closely so what does knowing which one he worked for and was fired from matter?

    15. Re:No mention of party -- must be a Democrat then by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The more I argued with them, the better I came to know their dialectic. First they counted on the stupidity of their adversary, and then, when there was no other way out, they themselves simply played stupid. If all this didn't help, they pretended not to understand, or, if challenged, they changed the subject in a hurry, quoted platitudes which, if you accepted them, they immediately related to entirely different matters, and then, if again attacked, gave ground and pretended not to know exactly what you were talking about. Whenever you tried to attack one of these apostles, your hand closed on a jelly-like slime which divided up and poured through your fingers, but in the next moment collected again. But if you really struck one of these fellows so telling a blow that, observed by the audience, he couldn't help but agree, and if you believed that this had taken you at least one step forward, your amazement was great the next day. The Jew had not the slightest recollection of the day before, he rattled off his same old nonsense as though nothing at all had happened, and, if indignantly challenged, affected amazement; he couldn't remember a thing, except that he had proved the correctness of his assertions the previous day.

      Sentence 2-3.

    16. Re:No mention of party -- must be a Democrat then by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Her district is Barbara Jordan's old district. Check out her stance on illegal aliens:

      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3qjdZUx7fUw

    17. Re:No mention of party -- must be a Democrat then by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, you aren't getting it. Try following the news sometimes and really watching for this pattern: anytime an Republican is caught doing something bad there are little (R) designations all over the place but when ever a Democrat is caught doing something bad there's a curious lack of reference to their party. Pretty much every time. This 'article' is a perfect example: Republicans are clearly identified and you're left to guess or infer the party of the person this jerk worked for.

      I agree with the other AC; its like they think we don't notice.

  8. Re:Doxxing a senator? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    this is aggravated doxxing it is double-dodeca-illegal for anyone to know I've been fudging my age

    your kind has no business knowing where I live, only the NSA gets to know that about people

    and by people I mean commoners

    because think of the child terrorists

  9. Re:Doxxing a senator? by _Sharp'r_ · · Score: 5, Informative

    By publishing their personal/direct cell/email/etc... info which isn't publicly available?

    It sounds like Congressional Democrats are really bad at hiring staff.

    --
    The party of stupid and the party of evil get together and do something both stupid and evil, then call it bipartisan.
  10. Re: Stupid childish whataboutism faux logic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    By your standards, Reagan was shot by a Democrat so itâ(TM)s for Republicans to shoot Dem Presidents.

    You are an idiot.

  11. Wow I canâ(TM)t believe this is on Slashdot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    An article about a Democrat fucking Republicans. They didnt really mention D vs R in the summary though, I guess youre just supposed to know that Mitch McConnell is an R.

  12. Let's play that game by Okian+Warrior · · Score: 0

    History lessons for those not around to remember:
    After the mass pardons by G H Bush of all the Reagan Iran-Contra criminals in '92, Republicans have no grounds to criticize any pardons done by Democrats.
    And it was Republican Gerald Ford who pardoned his Republican predecessor in '74 even before charges were brought, "a full, free, and absolute pardon unto Richard Nixon for all offenses against the United States which he, Richard Nixon, has committed or may have committed or taken part in during the period from January 20, 1969 through August 9,1974."
    The Republicans have been far more shameless in using the pardon to clear their cronies of crimes committed while in actual government positions.
    By the way, the Attorney General at the time who advised Bush on the Iran-Contra pardons was our current AG, William Barr, handpicked by Trump to take over the Justice Department now...

    Okay then, let's play that game.

    Democrats have no grounds to complain when Republicans filibuster a supreme court pick in the final year of a Democrat president (Obama's nomination of Garland) because Democrats started that tradition.

    Democrats have no grounds to complain when Republicans refuse to impeach a sitting president, because during Obama's campaign he convinced his party not to impeach George Bush for cause - including "taking the country to war under false pretenses" and various war crimes - because "it would divide the nation". (This despite Democrats holding firm majorities in both houses at the time.)

    1. Re:Let's play that game by jeff4747 · · Score: 4, Informative

      Democrats have no grounds to complain when Republicans filibuster a supreme court pick in the final year of a Democrat president (Obama's nomination of Garland) because Democrats started that tradition.

      Really? Which nominee did they filibuster for over a year? (If you want to save some time, they didn't.)

      Also, you're wrong about "filibustering" Garland. McConnell wouldn't even let there be a hearing in the Judiciary Committee, so there was no filibuster.

      Democrats have no grounds to complain when Republicans refuse to impeach a sitting president, because during Obama's campaign he convinced his party not to impeach George Bush for cause

      Wow do you not have a very good grasp of time.

      The person who blocked impeachment was Pelosi. Obama's campaign had not started yet in January 2007, when Pelosi declared "Impeachment is off the table". Also, Obama at that point had very little institutional power, since he'd only been a Senator for a short time by that point.

      (This despite Democrats holding firm majorities in both houses at the time.)

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...
      Senate was 49+2 yielding a truly massive one seat majority.
      House was 233 to 202, yielding a 31 seat majority.

      For those who are not quite familiar with the Constitution, conviction in the Senate requires 67 votes.

      Which 16 Republicans do you think would actually place party over country and convict? Keep in mind that almost all of those Senators are still in the Senate, and exactly zero of them are willing to put country over party under the Trump administration.

    2. Re:Let's play that game by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 1

      I'll bookmark the parent comment as "destroyed by facts, don't trust in the future". Thanks, jeff474747.

      --
      Ezekiel 23:20
    3. Re: Let's play that game by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Good job missing the point, idiot. I'll explain this to you simply, like I do for children.
      I don't care if Billy punched you, that doesn't give you the right to go punch Susan just because they're in the same reading group.

      The Democrats are going to keep losing if they don't stop with this whole "let's act like a bunch of retards because the GoP are acting like retards" line of thinking. Ya, Trump is a fucking moron, but that isn't a good reason to put an even bigger idiot, like AOC, into office.

    4. Re: Let's play that game by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ya, Trump is a fucking moron, but that isn't a good reason to put an even bigger idiot, like AOC, into office.

      I wholeheartedly agree. It is Hillary's turn to be president.

    5. Re: Let's play that game by jeff4747 · · Score: 1

      When you see attempting to return the discussion to what actually happened as a partisan issue, you are the problem.

  13. Re: Doxxing a senator? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Not just the doxxing, he broke into the office of the guy he doxxed like four time to hack the computer and steal stuff. That part is even more clearly criminal.

  14. Hope he had a dead man switch . . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    . . . so the dox got released after his arrest.

    1. Re: Hope he had a dead man switch . . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why?!? Seriously, why?!? What the F is wrong with your twisted messed up brain? He is clearly not a healthy person; clearly a criminal. Let justice be done and move on.

    2. Re: Hope he had a dead man switch . . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because if he was going to make a threat like that, he needed to be in a position to make it happen. Since he was taken into custody, no way he can release now. That, and the congresscritters deserve it.

  15. Re:Doxxing a senator? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It sounds like Congressional Democrats are really bad at hiring staff.

    Congressional Democrats are really bad, period.

  16. Re: Doxxing a senator? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I don't think this site has enough space to list the links to Trump's hiring mess.

  17. Unless it's a democrat/laftist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In which case you will barge out the group judgement for the actions of someone WHO ISN'T EVEN IN THAT GROUP.

  18. Re: Stupid childish whataboutism faux logic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ideological driven cherry-pickers like that poster are like soccer hooligans, any reflex emotional reaction is totally within bounds when your team takes a legitimate hit. What makes this disturbing is that, unlike soccer hooligans, alcohol (presumably) isn't a precipitating factor. Likely just suffering from severe TDS.

    Likely, "Costco" will undoubtably be "Smollettized" and be given a free pass and he'll return to his echo chamber.

  19. Re: Stupid childish whataboutism faux logic by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 0

    Which elected Democrat official shot Reagan?!

    --
    Ezekiel 23:20
  20. Re: Yup. Clearly. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    LOL, reading comprehension fail.

  21. Political prisoners by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Nice how you pick those three specifically. Ask the of them were prosecuted for embarrassing Obama.

  22. "pleaded guilty" by astrofurter · · Score: 1

    Oh how I do love the smell of coerced false confession in the morning!

    1. Re:"pleaded guilty" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Land of the brave and the free son, nothing else smells quite like it.

      Smell is particularly strong after rain and down the wind.

  23. Nowhere in the article is the word Democrat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    If a Republican aide had done this the work 'Republican' would be in every other sentence and it would also blame Trump.

    Modern journalism is all about deciding which facts the public shouldn't know because they might reflect badly on Democrats.
    - Jim Treacher

    1. Re:Nowhere in the article is the word Democrat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Did he really break in? How did he get access to the PCs?

      maybe someone should ask this sweetheart:

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Maggie_Hassan#Intern_swearing_incident
      "On the evening of June 19, 2018, a congressional intern was caught on video yelling, “Mr. President, Fuck You”, as President Trump walked through the United States Capitol for a meeting with Republican congressmen.[60]

      On June 25, Maggie Hassan's office confirmed that an intern, named Caitlin Marriott, was the person caught on video swearing at President Trump. A spokesman for a Senator Hassan confirmed that the intern has been suspended from her position for one week and has to turn in her Congressional intern ID badge.[61] Hassan refused demands for termination of the internship"

  24. A radical progressive speaks out! by sgt_doom · · Score: 1

    I have never voted republiCON, but I despise false and unproven allegations! Three women accused that SCOTUS nominee (whom I did not want on the bench, BTW) and two were discredited, at least one of them facing criminal charges, last I heard on the other they were unsure to charge her.

    The PuppetMedia kept claiming that Christine Blasey Ford was a "credible witness" yet there were quite important variances in her testimony (what she claimed - - what her psychologist or psychotherapist said // her mention of "beach friends" one of whom as a lifelong friend, retired FBI agent who, according to a past boyfriend's letter, she had coached to beat lie detector tests when she first applied for the FBI some 20 years prior).
    Why hasn't this Christine Blasey Ford been devoting her life to the pursuit of Kavanaugh if she is so credible????

    1. Re:A radical progressive speaks out! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Why hasn't this Christine Blasey Ford been devoting her life to the pursuit of Kavanaugh if she is so credible????

      Because most people want to forget about traumatizing experiences, not dwell on them for 30 years. As it is she eventually had to get therapy for it, four years before Kavanaugh was nominated, which is pretty convincing evidence that it happened, it did hurt her, and she didn't invent it to derail a Trump nominee (how the fuck was she supposed to know that Trump would be elected in four year's time, let alone that he'd nominate Kavanaugh?)

    2. Re:A radical progressive speaks out! by Can'tNot · · Score: 1

      two were discredited, at least one of them facing criminal charges, last I heard on the other they were unsure to charge her.

      This surprised me so I went looking, as near as I can tell none of this is true. None of the three have been discredited, and none of the three have been charged with anything. One of the three was referred to the justice department for criminal investigation by a Republican senator. That's it.

      This comment: "Why hasn't this Christine Blasey Ford been devoting her life to the pursuit of Kavanaugh if she is so credible????" is absolutely insane.

  25. Re:Doxxing a senator? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Republicans are a fucking disease.

  26. A comedian! by Daralantan · · Score: 1

    calling himself a "golden god"

    ROFL

    had a legal right to post the information

    send us bitcoins

    If it's his legal right, why do payments need to be paid in bitcoin?

    threatening email titled "I own EVERYTHING."

    would release private emails, encrypted messages, and the health data and social security numbers for senators' children. "If you tell anyone I will leak it all,"

    His legal right to sell children's social security numbers? This guy is pretty hilarious!

  27. Re: Stupid childish whataboutism faux logic by Can'tNot · · Score: 0

    This is just poor logic, no those are not the parent's standards. You are bad at following conversations. The AC at the top posted some anti-democratic nonsense, and the parent responded with some anti-republican stuff. The parent used the phrase "Republicans have no grounds to criticize any pardons done by Democrats" which is as close as it gets to what you're claiming, but this is a commonly used phrase when someone is trying to point out hypocrisy. It is not an excuse for Democrats to misbehave.

    Also, where on earth did you get the idea that John Hinkley Jr. was a Democrat? He was a nut, his motives were apolitical, and nothing says that he was a registered voter in any party.

  28. Re: Stupid childish whataboutism faux logic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Whooosh.
    Try reading what he said, next time.

    Shifting the goal posts and attacking what he didn't say, only makes you look stupid.

  29. Capital Police? by ebvwfbw · · Score: 1

    In Washington DC there happens to be all kinds of police. Probably more than any other place in the country. There's Metro PD (DC Police), FBI, Secret Service, Customs, Treasury, Federal Protection, Park Police, bla bla bla.. finally - Capital Police! So they just let people in and do whatever? Seems odd. Here's a fired guy, don't need to watch him? Usually when you're fired from some place, you're persona non grata.

    Maybe the Capital Police are only good enough for show?

  30. Re: Stupid childish whataboutism faux logic by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 1

    I thought the goal posts were "crimes committed while in actual government positions".

    --
    Ezekiel 23:20