Slashdot Mirror
Monotype Launches the First Redesign in 35 Years of the World's Most Ubiquitous Font, Helvetica (creativeboom.com)
Monotype today introduced the Helvetica Now typeface, a new family of fonts that have been carefully and respectfully re-drawn for the modern era. From a report: Consisting of 48 fonts and three optical sizes, the typeface has been produced from size-specific drawings and with size-specific spacing and is the first redesign in 35 years of what many argue is the world's most ubiquitous font, Helvetica. Every character has been redrawn and refit and a host of useful alternates have been added to help brands meet modern-day branding challenges. Espousing the simplicity, clarity, timelessness and global appeal of the typeface's storied tradition, the Helvetica Now design aims to be more sophisticated and graceful than its predecessors. An extremely popular and well-known typeface, the Helvetica family has been used by countless brands and creative professionals, in millions of designs since its inception. The typeface embodies clean and versatile design, and the Helvetica Now typeface continues the tradition established by the Helvetica and Neue Helvetica families while introducing a number of improvements.
I'm still waiting for an update/refresh of Papyrus typeface!
How else will James Cameron complete the next 17 Avatar movies?
https://www.myfonts.com/fonts/... To bad they do not show the font in the article.
How difficult is it to show a side-by-side diagram instead of a bunch of mangled composite images of bottles and cut up posters and things?
The Daddy casts sleep on the Baby. The Baby resists!
I would have never thought a documentary about a font would be interesting, but Helvetica the documentary was actually very interesting. I'd recommend it as an interesting watch on a lazy weekend.
How does Helvetica Now compare? Something that visually shows the difference would have been useful. I can't tell, either at the article or at Monotype's website.
Meanwhile, also just announced was the free typeface Public Sans, "a strong, neutral typeface for text or display" (https://public-sans.digital.gov/). That page lets you see samples, but the github page (https://github.com/uswds/public-sans) shows excellent side-by-side and overlay comparisons. That is how a new/updated typeface should be introduced.
It sure beats reading monospaced font!
W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?...
I find the business of licensed uses of fonts interesting. It made sense for printed documents, but it gets hairy now with CSS being able to download custom fonts.
If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
... for all tastes and purposes, I clearly see no reason to ever buy a commercial one.
Aren't "Source Sans Pro" and "Noto" already "professional enough" alternatives to Helvetica for you?
And here for the more playful purposes: https://www.1001freefonts.com/
why not link Monotype's site with samples, instead of that eyecandy page?
https://www.monotype.com/fonts...
It uses a drop-in replacement look-alike, Nimbus Sans, which was donated to the GhostScript project by the foundry URW++. The foundry donated a full drop-in replacement font package covering the basic 35 PostScript standard fonts.
More info:
http://www.tug.org/fonts/deuts...
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...
-- Look to the Rose that blows about us--"Lo, Laughing," she says, "into the World I blow..."
This just means that you don't know what kerning is, probably don't need or use ligatures, don't reproduce the font at very large sizes, and don't need to ever convert the font to tool paths (such as a cutter, or router).
If you did, you would know that there is a WORLD of difference between most freebie fonts and ones that have been painstakingly worked over.
You ruined his apple rant
What exclusive agreement? Adobe licensed Helvetica and shipped it with pretty much every DTP-related product they had on any platform. Helvetica is in every Postscript printer, for example. Those aren't Mac only.
Helvetica was never cheap to license which meant that Microsoft went hunting elsewhere pretty early on and licensed the cheap (in every sense of the word) knock-off "Arial". But that was a Microsoft decision, it wasn't made by Monotype or Apple.
You can buy it here.
I agree it isn't ubiquitous, most of the time a sans-serif font that looks like Helvetica is a knock off or a font inspired by it but redesigned for a specific purpose like the Rail Alphabet. But occasionally you get to see it in its glory, and it has to be said, it's one of the most beautiful fonts in the world.
You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
None of which explains this level of douchieness:
Learning HOW to think is more important than learning WHAT to think.
An ideal font in my view is one that essentially gets out of the way and lets your brain focus on the actual content, and this one misses that mark. Looking at samples of actual blocks of text, there are two visibly different baselines: one for letters made of generally straight strokes like i, f, t, and v, and a slightly lower one for letters containing a loop like a, b, e, g, and s. It's just a pixel or two, but more than enough to be a distraction. Unclear if it might become less noticeable over time, but I don't get what useful purpose it could serve.
What a coincidence - I just opened a lemonade stand!
#DeleteChrome
No. I will not buy it. I will never buy it. It is a fucking font. It is not worth billions of dollars. I'll use cuneiform on clay tablets before I give Monotype a dime.
Come on now, I think we all know what keming is.
Velociraptor = Distiraptor / Timeraptor
Mod parent up. Links given above, made active:
Public Sans Regular.
Github page.
Public Sans seems far better than Libre Franklin.