Slashdot Mirror


Why Tens of Thousands of Perfectly Good, Donated iPhones Are Shredded Every Year (vice.com)

An anonymous reader quotes a report from Motherboard: Tens of thousands of perfectly usable iPhones are scrapped each year by electronics recyclers because of the iPhone's "activation lock," according to a new analysis paper published Thursday. Earlier this year, we published a lengthy feature about the iPhone's activation lock (also called iCloud lock informally), an anti-theft feature that prevents new accounts from logging into iOS without the original user's iCloud password. This means that stolen phones can't be used by the person who stole it without the original owner's iCloud password (this lock can also be remotely enabled using Find My iPhone.) The feature makes the iPhone a less valuable theft target, but it has had unintended consequences, as well. iCloud lock has led to the proliferation of an underground community of hackers who use phishing and other techniques to steal iCloud passwords from the original owner and unlock phones. It's also impacted the iPhone repair, refurbishing, and recycling industry, because phones that are legitimately obtained often still have iCloud enabled, making that phone useless except for parts.

Between 2015 and 2018, the Wireless Alliance, the recycling company in question, collected roughly 6 million cell phones in donation boxes it set up around the country. Of those, 333,519 of them were iPhones deemed by the company to be "reusable." And of those, 33,000 of them were iCloud locked and had to be stripped for parts and scrap metal. Last year, a quarter of all reusable iPhones it collected were activation locked. Allison Conwell, a coauthor of the CoPIRG report, told me in a phone call that the Wireless Alliance's findings show that many people donate their devices intending for them to be reused, but they're scrapped instead. In her paper, Conwell suggests that Apple should work with certified recyclers to unlock phones that have been legitimately donated (a survey of random devices conducted by the Wireless Alliance found that more than 90 percent of them had not been reported lost or stolen.) The paper suggests that Apple could either unlock phones that have not been reported lost or stolen for 30 days, or affirmatively ask users whether they had donated their previous phone and unlock it that way.

132 comments

  1. The author is delusional by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Apple has zero interest in recycling or repairing recovering data from any of their products, they only want to sell you a new device.

    1. Re: The author is delusional by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      If and it's a really big if Apple has no interest then why refurbish any phones at all instead of shredding them?

    2. Re: The author is delusional by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Worse still, they actively block repair shops from ordering and stocking parts. They are an abbomonation to the environment.

    3. Re: The author is delusional by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh darling, lets shred this iPhone. It's perfectly good but I just feel spiteful today

    4. Re:The author is delusional by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2Bu-gl7v-P8

    5. Re:The author is delusional by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      This. This consequence is far from "unintended".

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    6. Re: The author is delusional by bev_tech_rob · · Score: 1

      What kind of babbling bullshit are you talking about that has NOTHING to do with the topic at hand??

      --
      You're messin' with my Zen Thing, man.....
    7. Re:The author is delusional by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      More like TENS OF MILLIONS every year. If resettable, everyone would find a home.

    8. Re:The author is delusional by jellomizer · · Score: 1

      Most companies have a Love Hate relationship with Refurbished equipment. They hate it because people are buying their products that they have already sold so they are not getting money from it. However they also love it because people are not buying the competing product.

      Apple is in a stronger position if those who cannot afford new Apple products but get refurbished means still more people using the Apple Ecosystem so they still may buy a cheap app or songs that is money in their pocket.

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    9. Re: The author is delusional by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Worse still, they actively block repair shops from ordering and stocking parts. They are an abbomonation to the environment.

      I call bullshit.

      I bought a replacement battery for my wife's iPhone 6 from iFixit. It was reasonably priced and it arrived in a couple of days. But don't just take my anecdotal evidence as proof of anything.

      How about a citation for this alleged blocking orders?

    10. Re:The author is delusional by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Apple has zero interest in recycling or repairing recovering data from any of their products, they only want to sell you a new device.

      No, of course not. Apple has zero interest in recycling:

      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2Bu-gl7v-P8

      https://www.apple.com/newsroom/2018/04/apple-adds-earth-day-donations-to-trade-in-and-recycling-program/

      Daisy is the SECOND generation of their Recycling Robots, BTW.

      And their stated goal in all this:

      https://www.fastcompany.com/90236080/how-apple-is-trying-to-reduce-e-waste-with-its-new-iphones

      https://www.apple.com/environment/

      BTW, the new Mac mini and MacBook Air's Aluminum cases are reportedly 100% recycled Aluminum:

      https://www.theverge.com/2018/10/30/18042448/macbook-mac-mini-recycled-materials-2018-environmental-impact

      Jus' sayin'...

    11. Re: The author is delusional by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      apple is a cancer in the tech industry.

    12. Re: The author is delusional by Nidi62 · · Score: 1

      Because it's free money for Apple. The phone is bought the first time, so manufacturing cost is covered, plus a bug premium. Then the phone is turned in for an upgrade, refurbished at minimal cost, and resold for not much less than a new device. Free money.

      --
      The only thing necessary for evil to triumph is for it to be pitted against a slightly greater evil
    13. Re: The author is delusional by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Apple could do the refurbishing themselves. Put a new shiny casing on the old electronics. Sell with a bigger profit than new, as cases are cheap for them.

    14. Re: The author is delusional by Pax681 · · Score: 1

      Worse still, they actively block repair shops from ordering and stocking parts. They are an abbomonation to the environment.

      I call bullshit. I bought a replacement battery for my wife's iPhone 6 from iFixit. It was reasonably priced and it arrived in a couple of days. But don't just take my anecdotal evidence as proof of anything. How about a citation for this alleged blocking orders?

      have you ever heard of Louis Rossman of Rossman group? https://www.youtube.com/user/r... Or ever heard of Jessa Jones from Ipad Rehab? https://www.youtube.com/watch?... ooh look a video about apple having goods seized by customs??? you sir and probably just a silly troll or a pathetic apple fan boy

    15. Re: The author is delusional by jnork · · Score: 1

      These phones are being donated for distribution to battered women for emergency use. I think he's being overly dramatic and overstating his case, but his overall point is valid.

      --
      Cleverly disguised as a responsible adult.
    16. Re:The author is delusional by vakuona · · Score: 1

      Apple sells about 200 million iPhones each year. Apple is definitely not attempting to stop tens of thousands of iPhones from being reused to encourage more sales. If anything, iPhones tend to be used longer than other smartphones - https://www.sciencedaily.com/r...

      So this idea that Apple just wants you to get a new one is not supported by the facts.

    17. Re: The author is delusional by tlhIngan · · Score: 1

      have you ever heard of Louis Rossman of Rossman group? https://www.youtube.com/user/r... Or ever heard of Jessa Jones from Ipad Rehab? https://www.youtube.com/watch?... ooh look a video about apple having goods seized by customs??? you sir and probably just a silly troll or a pathetic apple fan boy

      Because they failed to do proper trademark redaction. Louis Rossman, while a great technician, is really a charlatan in the end because he gets business by making over the top claims. iFixit used to do this plenty of times but stopped recently, as they are not dependent on "clicks" or "views" to spread their word and thus don't actually need hyperbole.

      The problem was simple - Rossman took a bunch of Apple batteries, had some Chinese factory refurbish them, then send them back. The factory offered to scratch off the Apple logo (because they were no longer official Apple batteries) or even just cover it up. Rossman refused that service, under the mistaken belief that those batteries were still Official Apple Batteries.

      Apple took notice and had customs block the shipment - because they were not official Apple batteries. They were Chinese remanufactured batteries that had some Apple original parts on them. This is a definition of trademark infringement.

      All they had to do was cover the Apple logo up with their own logo - since the battery was no longer official Apple, it wouldn't hurt to have the Rossman group logo on there.

      Of course, there's also the matter of safety - should those Rossman batteries explode, if they were marked as Apple batteries, I'm sure customs blockages would be the least of Louis' problems

  2. WHY, by wolfheart111 · · Score: 0, Troll

    greed.... need I say more.

    --
    [($)]
    1. Re:WHY, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      also gazillion of fools paying for locked hardware and software... and they get their data locked!

    2. Re: WHY, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because nothing is more important than security in the post-inside-job world. Sieg heil the homeland or fatherland or whatever you want to call it. AE911Truth Org

    3. Re: WHY, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I believe the popular name for it these days is "Eretz Israel".

  3. Hhmmmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The first thing that came into my mind is because iPhones are trash. :D

  4. 10% of donated iPhones were locked by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    âoeMore than 90% not stolenâ
    Hmmmmmm

    1. Re:10% of donated iPhones were locked by Papaspud · · Score: 1

      or reported lost, who knows what the %s are.

      --
      Everything above is my opinion....YMMV
  5. Samsung phones have a similar feature by bferrell · · Score: 3, Informative

    Do a factory reset and you have to log into the original owners samsung account

    1. Re: Samsung phones have a similar feature by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, but unlike Samsung phones iPhones are secure.

    2. Re:Samsung phones have a similar feature by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've had two Samsung phones. WTF is a "Samsung account"?

    3. Re: Samsung phones have a similar feature by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Knock on wood

    4. Re:Samsung phones have a similar feature by sheramil · · Score: 2

      Samsung account lets you back up and restore your phone's settings and data. It worked well the one time I had to do it.

    5. Re:Samsung phones have a similar feature by swillden · · Score: 5, Informative

      Do a factory reset and you have to log into the original owners samsung account

      Not just Samsung... all Android phones. Though usually it's your Google account, not your Samsung account, that you need to authenticate to prove ownership after a factory reset. (In fact, even Samsung says it's your Google account; so I think maybe you're confused about that.)

      This feature, called Factory Reset Protection (FRP) by the Android team, was implemented in both iOS and Android 4-5 years ago,, to comply with a California state law that mandated it. For Android, it was launched in May 2016, in Android 5.1. Although it is only legally required for devices sold in California (AFAIK), it's generally a very good idea. Device theft was rapidly ballooning into a huge problem, but thanks to FRP has ceased to be a significant issue. If you set a password on your phone, thieves get no value from it.

      However, there's no reason that FRP-locked devices have to be destroyed. At least in the Android world, device makers install keys on the devices which can be used to bypass FRP. These keys are only accessible to authorized refurbishing centers, of course, because if they leak to phone thieves then the purpose of the feature is defeated.

      --
      Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
    6. Re: Samsung phones have a similar feature by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't get it. Secure against Apple? They have the backdoor password into your account. It's called: they own the servers. They own the cryptographic certificates. They own your life.

    7. Re: Samsung phones have a similar feature by swillden · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Yeah, but unlike Samsung phones iPhones are secure.

      I'd say that Samsung phones are roughly as secure as iPhones, though neither is quite as secure as the Google Pixel. Of course, security is a multi-dimensional discrete space, not a one-dimensional continuum, so any comparisons of this sort are of questionable validity without a precisely-defined threat model. However, if we use the results of public competitions as our metric, Samsung and Apple phones get cracked with roughly equal frequency, while Pixel phones fare much better (Pixel has stood unbeaten three years running in Mobile Pwn2Own, for example, while both Apple and Samsung were cracked every year).

      --
      Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
    8. Re:Samsung phones have a similar feature by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      You mean when...

    9. Re:Samsung phones have a similar feature by gnasher719 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      For an iPhone, the steps are:

      1. Go to settings
      2. Go to General
      3. Select Reset
      4. Select Erase all content and settings
      5. Confirm Erase iPhone, then confirm again
      6. Enter your Apple id password and select erase

      Now the iPhone can be used by the next buyer. Phone thieves fail at step 6. Obviously anyone who wants to accept donated iPhones should make these steps very, very clear to the donator.

    10. Re:Samsung phones have a similar feature by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wondered if there wasn't a proper procedure people just didn't know to follow.

      That answers that.

    11. Re: Samsung phones have a similar feature by dddux · · Score: 1

      And then again my Nokia 9800 is absolutely secure because nobody would want it but me. ;)

      --
      "It is no measure of health to be well adjusted to a profoundly sick society." - Jiddu Krishnamurti
    12. Re: Samsung phones have a similar feature by swillden · · Score: 1

      And then again my Nokia 9800 is absolutely secure because nobody would want it but me. ;)

      And there's no data on it that anyone would want?

      --
      Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
    13. Re:Samsung phones have a similar feature by mr_lemonade4796 · · Score: 1

      There are a lot of settings and procedures on the iPhone that most users do not know about.

      I'm sometimes surprised that iPhone owners know how to use their iPhone at all.

          -T-

  6. Derez haxx0rz in dem thar ph0nz by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "the proliferation of an underground community of hackers who use phishing and other techniques to steal iCloud passwords from the original owner and unlock phones"

    For BeauHD and their favorite "news"blogs, any excuse to smear "hackers" will do. Any excuse at all.

  7. Re: Apple doesn't care by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why not charge those employees for the iPhone unless they return them unlocked.

  8. 10% of the locked phones are reported stolen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    is a really high number. I highly doubt the the one's doing the recycling are returning those to individuals. And the fact that they want an unlock on phones that haven't been reported stolen for 30 days just means that they are going to wait 30 days before trying to unlock them. Screw those guys!

  9. They should build a wall ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Out of all them bricks. The Mexico border looks good

  10. Re:Apple doesn't care by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Tim Cook and Apple sadly don't care. Any re-used iphone is a detriment to their stock price and therefore bottom line. Until us mere mortals stand up and fight we might as well be minions.. without the cool yellow heads, blue overalls and un-discernible language.

    =P

  11. Re: Apple doesn't care by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Better yet, why is the phone not locked to a corporate account instead of their own personal account? You can log into both, but the device is only tied to the first. Seems like an admin error screwing them over from lack of correct practices.

  12. Apple Cares Deeply by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Apple cares deeply about fucking you as a customer. A recused iPhone is someone who isn't smug and rich enough to deserve an iPhone. Fuck the environment, you must buy a new phone if you are to be one of the iPeople.

  13. Re:Apple doesn't care by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So much misinformation. Firstly any IT department worth it's salt will manage iOS devices with an MDM through Apple Business Manager and this problem goes away. If your company doesn't utilize MDM a quck phone call to Apple support, prove ownership, and they will unlock iCloud lock.

  14. Unintended consequences... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... my ass.

  15. No, Apple "cannot" unlock the phone by fustakrakich · · Score: 1

    They have to deny it. Otherwise the government can order them to do it any time they want.

    --
    “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
    1. Re:No, Apple "cannot" unlock the phone by ReneR · · Score: 1

      they would not need to unlock or de-crypt it, Simply hard resetting would be enough.

    2. Re:No, Apple "cannot" unlock the phone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can get a court order.
      And the court can deem ownership - such as when drugs or proceeds of crime are seized, or lost time up(usually 3 months).
      If Apple still make excuses you can ship them back to apple for a full-out-of-factory cleaning using a test jig.
      If they defy this order, pass a law that ALL IP relating to an itard is null and void. That is anyone can offer their services to do it.
      That may involve a scanning tunneling microscope and lithium nicobate on the shaved chips - full reverse engineering with everything for sale.
      You would think India or China would have a solution.

      We wait with baited breath for Right of Repair bills to pass. Failing that impose a 'non recyclable point of purchase tax' of 10% on all their products.

    3. Re:No, Apple "cannot" unlock the phone by GrandCow · · Score: 2

      Apple can disassociate a device from the iCloud account that it's tied to at any time. That means you can factory wipe the device and use the hardware as if it was out of the box new again.

      They won't unless you have an original receipt of purchase, and the device hasn't been put into lost mode.

      That doesn't mean they will grant access to the account that is signed in, it just means the device will be erased and an entirely new account can be signed in.

      --
      "Well kids, you tried your best, and you failed. The lesson is, never try." -Homer Simpson
  16. Re:Apple doesn't care by dissy · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Apple refuses to unlock them even though they belong to the company. I'm surprised they are allowed to get away with this in a corporate environment

    Er, if they are company owned, why are they not linked to the company Apple ID?

    What you describe isn't company owned phones, but the company handing out money for employees to purchase employee owned phones.

    For our company all iOS and Android devices the company purchases are delivered directly to IT (me) and the first things I do to iPhones/iPads are link it to our company apple ID followed by enrolling it to the corporate MDM. Only after that are they issued to employees.

    Apple even has an "enterprise" setup where phones come pre-linked to an MDM/AppleID from the factory. Then they can ship them straight to the end user, and the new device shows up in the MDM inventory for provisioning before it is delivered.

    Unfortunately the "enterprise" setup has a per-device / per-month fee to use it.
    But the normal way of provisioning doesn't have any such fee, the only real costs are related to the devices coming through IT first.

  17. If you think that's bad by rsilvergun · · Score: 1

    somebody threw out a perfectly good white boy

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
  18. Re:Apple doesn't care by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We only have thousands of apple devices, but we do MDM. Weird that you don't mention DEP at all.

    We have a guy dedicated to The Problem you're trying to handwave away. The Problem that doesn't exist, doesn't happen. Yes, he makes quick (jesus christ are you for real) phone calls to Apple support. He fucking hates them. Staff managed to get their shit trapped behind your beloved wall? Sorry lady, you'll have your ipad back in a week if you're lucky. Fortunately you never use the thing. Actually, most of the people issued one at your site last year probably never turned it on twice - they never made it past signing in to the network.

    I'm making some assumptions here. I suppose it's possible you don't actually have your nose in the air, it just seems that way because you're on your knees gargling APPL.

    Shit, now I can't close with any "eat a dick" remark.

  19. Re:Apple doesn't care by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    He hates making the calls*

    He actually used to be as zealous as any fanboy. Decline probably started back around osx10.10, the coffee table book was what finally broke his faith, for some reason.

  20. Because nobody wants to buy them by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    any more questions?

  21. Same with Android FRP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Similar with Android FRP.

  22. Maths by mentil · · Score: 2

    333,519 of them were iPhones deemed by the company to be "reusable." And of those, 33,000 of them were iCloud locked... the Wireless Alliance found that more than 90 percent of them had not been reported lost or stolen

    Working as intended?

    --
    Corruption is convincing someone that the selfless ideal is the same as their selfish ideal.
    1. Re:Maths by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Working as intended?

      Exactly!

    2. Re:Maths by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Most people don't bother reporting stolen phones because it's a waste of time.

  23. Re:Apple doesn't care by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 4, Insightful

    We have hundreds of iPhones returned by former employees that are unusable because of this. Apple refuses to unlock them even though they belong to the company.

    Sounds like the company needs to learn how to properly deploy corporate-managed iPhones.

    --
    #DeleteChrome
  24. Re:Apple doesn't care by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

    I wonder if Apple has a way to unlock them. When they swap phones out for warranty reasons, for example, they refurb the old one and give it to someone else. The one you get as a warranty replacement is often a refurb.

    So are they just throwing the locked ones away, or replacing the motherboard, or do they have some way to unlock them?

    --
    const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
    SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
  25. That's just 3 cubic meters of waste by GlobalEcho · · Score: 4, Interesting

    The number of iPhones discarded due to this problem, 33,000, works out to 3.1 cubic meters of waste (assuming they are all modern size).

    There may be a fair bit of value there, with exotic elements and whatnot, but it's hardly an environmental disaster. It's way less waste volume than you would get from, say, demolishing a Blockbuster Video store and replacing it with a Mattress Firm.

    1. Re:That's just 3 cubic meters of waste by Krishnoid · · Score: 1

      And of those, 33,000 of them were iCloud locked and had to be stripped for parts and scrap metal.

      Less, even, if they can reclaim the parts and reuse them for repairs.

  26. Re: Apple doesn't care by dnaumov · · Score: 1

    Sounds like you need to fire the people doing bookkeeping. Yes, its slow and annoying, but Apple very much DOES unlock corporate devices.

  27. Factory reset before donation? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Please excuse my ignorance, but wouldn't any sane person do a factory reset before donating an unwanted phone and would this remove any locks on an iPhone?

    1. Re:Factory reset before donation? by GrandCow · · Score: 4, Interesting

      An iCloud lock associates the serial number of an iPhone to an iCloud account.

      No matter which way you erase the device, as soon as the device connects to the internet (this cannot be skipped, either through cellular, wifi, or wired to a computer), the first thing that happens is the device connects to the Apple servers and sends the serial number and checks if it's locked or not.

      There are videos showing iCloud lock removals by reprogramming the chips that have the serial to a different number, but that involves completely disassembling the device and desoldering a specific chip from the logic board, then reprogramming it with a very specific piece of hardware. I'm not sure if that still works, the last video I saw of it was an iPhone 6S from years ago.

      --
      "Well kids, you tried your best, and you failed. The lesson is, never try." -Homer Simpson
    2. Re:Factory reset before donation? by carlhaagen · · Score: 1

      A sane person would, yes, and that would unregister the phone from their iCloud account and the phone would be free to use by a new owner. People are not sane, however.

    3. Re:Factory reset before donation? by carlhaagen · · Score: 4, Informative

      Any eventual lock the owner has enabled is removed and deleted in entirety when they unregister the device from their iCloud account. That's all you have to do to prevent this problem when giving/selling the phone to someone. Nothing more. It's that simple.

  28. Re:Apple doesn't care by GrandCow · · Score: 1

    You are lying or your IT department is inept.

    Apple specifically has a program for corporate, mass-purchased phones. Enroll them in the MDM program and corporate IT can remove the lock no matter which employee locks the phone.

    --
    "Well kids, you tried your best, and you failed. The lesson is, never try." -Homer Simpson
  29. Re:Apple doesn't care by GrandCow · · Score: 1

    Apple has a program specifically for companies with corporate owned iPhones. The person who posted that they have "hudreds" of locked iPhones is either a troll or has the worst IT department, as well as the worst CTO, on the planet.

    Corporate iPhones are registered with the company and no matter the personal account signed onto the phone, corporate IT can remove the lock any time they want.

    --
    "Well kids, you tried your best, and you failed. The lesson is, never try." -Homer Simpson
  30. Eating into Apple Profits by X!0mbarg · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Apple WANTS people to scrap their old iPhones, because they want to sell New phones to everyone.
    It's been the driving force behind their No Repair policy, and why they are so Adamant on blocking any Right to Repair legislation that gets attempted.
    As their new phone sales have been flagging, they are getting desperate to have old phones cycled out so that their new phones get sold.
    -
    Most of the recycling problem would be solved by people disabling their iCloud service before donating. That, or "Factory Rest" them beforehand, as suggested in many other posts.
    -
    How about a campaign geared toward recycling phones?
    "How To Reset" info on a collection website, perhaps?
    That could make a difference as well.

    1. Re:Eating into Apple Profits by gnasher719 · · Score: 2

      Apple WANTS people to scrap their old iPhones, because they want to sell New phones to everyone.

      My wife's experience: The camera on her 2 1/2 year old iPhone stopped working. She made an appointment with the Apple Store, someone took her phone, cleaned up everything, somehow fixed the camera problem, it looks and feels like brand new, and it was free of any charge. Without having to pay for any extended warranty.

      Guess what: The will sell a new iPhone to her in a few years time.

    2. Re:Eating into Apple Profits by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Would you rather more phones were stolen, or more phones were sold?

    3. Re:Eating into Apple Profits by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You sound like a salty thief that can't make money anymore. Works as intended.

    4. Re:Eating into Apple Profits by radarskiy · · Score: 1

      "they want to sell New phones to everyone"

      This is not a revelation, since any seller would like to sell new phones to everyone. There is no evidence that Apple is trying to force this more so than anyone else, and they obviously recognize that they cannot magically convert every sale of a used iPhone into a sale of a new iPhone since they themselves sell used iPhones. A healthy market in used goods support higher first sale prices.

      "Most of the recycling problem would be solved by people disabling their iCloud service before donating."

      This is not a revelation, and does not help address the problem of devices that are donated without this having been done.

      "How about a campaign geared toward recycling phones?"

      This is not a revelation, since this is what the whole damn article is about.

  31. Re:Apple doesn't care by betsuin · · Score: 1

    I had a company iPad unlocked - was a bit drawn out and annoying.
    Employee left under a cloud as it were and had "forgotten" the password, so it's on my desk.
    Seems Apple somehow put me into consumer not corporate, that's what they blamed it on.
    I had supplied all the proof of ownership all that stuff and it didn't get resolved, I did get pretty narky on the phone at the end of it all.
    Really was a PITA though.. real time waster.

  32. "but it has had unintended consequences" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "but it has had unintended consequences"

    Do you really think they are unintended?

    I have strong reasons to believe they are the primary motive behind this lock, not theft protection.

    1. Re: "but it has had unintended consequences" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It is theft protection this was well covered in the past. You need to pay attention.

  33. And 33,000 gigajoules of energy by islisis · · Score: 1

    Are you considering the resources it takes to replace that working appliance? Some estimates place one smartphone to consume an average of 1 gigajoule of energy and 13 tons of water to manufacture.

    https://www.theatlantic.com/te...

    https://www.independent.co.uk/...

    1. Re:And 33,000 gigajoules of energy by GlobalEcho · · Score: 1

      Are you considering the resources it takes to replace that working appliance? Some estimates place one smartphone to consume an average of 1 gigajoule of energy and 13 tons of water to manufacture.

      I was not considering that. For reference, 33 terajoules is equivalent to 6 or 7 international airline flights and 430000 tons of water is one day of water usage by the US Steel plants in Detroit.

    2. Re:And 33,000 gigajoules of energy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are you considering the resources it takes to replace that working appliance? Some estimates place one smartphone to consume an average of 1 gigajoule of energy and 13 tons of water to manufacture.

      I was not considering that. For reference, 33 terajoules is equivalent to 6 or 7 international airline flights and 430000 tons of water is one day of water usage by the US Steel plants in Detroit.

      That's a massive amount of wasted energy.

    3. Re:And 33,000 gigajoules of energy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      1 gigajoule of electricity costs $9.50 at wholesale prices. 13 tons of water costs $9 wholesale. That doesn't sound like a lot of resources to me.

  34. Re: Why Should Apple Help? by Cmdln+Daco · · Score: 1

    There should be a stiff up-front charge on every iPhone to pay for scrapping. Perhaps 30% .

  35. Re: Apple doesn't care by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Unless you put them in supervised mode or enrolled in DEP then this is hard to avoid.

    This sort of problem can creep up, it wasn't an issue a few years ago before the cloud lock.

    Other things change as well like the 2 factor authentication, The cloud lock wasn't so bad if you had control of the email address, but since they've been pushing 2 factor this isn't sufficient to unlock.

    This sort of stuff really hit smaller organisations hardest those that are a bit too small to have an IT department to watch this.

  36. I'd hesitate to say this burden is on Apple by carlhaagen · · Score: 4, Interesting

    The function serves its purpose in terms of reducing theft of people's property. The problem is that people don't know that they need to unregister their iPhone from their iCloud account before they sell the phone. Really, that's all you have to do - log in on your iCloud account and remove the device from there, and it's no longer tied to your account and can be repurposed by someone else and their iCloud account without any hassle.

    1. Re:I'd hesitate to say this burden is on Apple by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not if you die, or loose it.
      Mr theif is looking for a quick hit, A delay of 9 months would be adequate, especially if zero activity.

    2. Re:I'd hesitate to say this burden is on Apple by Luthair · · Score: 1

      Why would a user who only buys brand spanken new phones know that there was something special they were supposed to after factory resetting their old one? I'd say its more than a little on Apple that they don't have a way to allow phones which have not been reported as stolen to be unlocked. I wouldn't go as far as saying Apple is doing it maliciously, but its clear that they are incentivized not to fix this problem as the prime competitor for the past gen phones they sell are used iphones.

    3. Re:I'd hesitate to say this burden is on Apple by gnasher719 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Why would a user who only buys brand spanken new phones know that there was something special they were supposed to after factory resetting their old one?

      You don't have to do anything after factory resetting the old phone. But you have to factory reset it.

    4. Re:I'd hesitate to say this burden is on Apple by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Look I work for Apple. Stop spreading your lack of knowledge.

      Factory resetting an Iphone does not remove activation lock.

      You actually have to go to settings-Icloud-then turn off find my Iphone then the activation lock is removed. You do not have have to reset at this point even though it is wise if you do.

      If you reset an Iphone without turning off FMIP it will still require you to sign in with the apple ID required.

    5. Re:I'd hesitate to say this burden is on Apple by Luthair · · Score: 1

      Look I work for Apple. Stop spreading your lack of knowledge.

      I'm going to guess in the mail room because you aren't demonstrating any reading comprehension.

      Factory resetting an Iphone does not remove activation lock.

      No shit, which is why I said that a user wouldn't know that.

  37. Re: Apple doesn't care by ZorinLynx · · Score: 1

    Actually they will unlock them with proof of purchase information (a PO). Source: We've done it at work numerous times.

  38. Re:Apple doesn't care by swillden · · Score: 1

    We have hundreds of iPhones returned by former employees that are unusable because of this. Apple refuses to unlock them even though they belong to the company.

    Sounds like the company needs to learn how to properly deploy corporate-managed iPhones.

    Yes. Both Android and iOS provide key escrow services for corp-managed devices, so the corporation can unlock them without the employee's help. Android goes a step further and offers the ability for user-owned devices to set up a "work profile" which contains all corporate apps and data, and gives enterprises the ability to manage or delete the work profile apps, but no access to the personal profile or data.

    If some company is suffering because it fails to use the enterprise features available, that's its own fault. This stuff has been available in mobile OSes for some time.

    --
    Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
  39. Re:Apple doesn't care by sims+2 · · Score: 1

    From experience managed devices are also a PITA for recyclers/second hand dealers because:
    1. The device makes no attempt to make it obvious the device is managed going as far as to put indicators in a different place than the existing activation locks people know to check for.
    2. No online documentation suggests checking if a device is managed before.
    buying/selling/trading/donating so people who work in secondhand goods get bitten by it at least once.

    But for the control it gives you it's freaking awesome for companies and other institutions that issue phones.
    Need a device unlocked? *click* need a device remotely reset? *click* want to remotely reroute its web traffic through your own servers for monitoring, filtering or security? *click*

    It can't be removed by the person who has the phone and any apps you specify will automatically be reloaded whenever the device is reset for a consistent deployment.

    I don't know why anyone issuing phones wouldn't be taking advantage of that.

    --
    Minimum threshold fixed. Thanks!
  40. Apple Watch by Dan+East · · Score: 1

    The iCloud activation lock applies to the Apple Watch as well. In my town our state has a warehouse store where they sell government surplus to the public. They also sell items confiscated and lost at airports. Apple Watches turn up on occasion, and I purchased two. The first one was activation locked. There is nothing I can do to make use of this watch. The watch was lost, held by the airport and then the government for many months and never claimed. I bought it legitimately and legally from the government.

    The most annoying part is not only can't I use it, but I also cannot contact the person who owns it. Their email address is partially displayed - you know, the k*****@gmail.com type thing. It just seems there must be some manner in which to handle these cases. It would have to be done through some organization that mediates between the owner and the person / entity that is in possession of the device (to prevent various kinds of abuse).

    --
    Better known as 318230.
    1. Re:Apple Watch by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh I am sure the former owner of the Apple Watch would love to get an e-mail from you and help you out with your problem, he's not at all pissed that his expensive watch was stolen from him.

      Idiot.

    2. Re:Apple Watch by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey, I'm k*****@gmail.com!

      I'd love to help you out so you can use the $500 Apple Watch I bought. I guess it was lost in the shuffle of having to take out my laptop and put it in a bin, remove my shoes, remove the watch from my wrist, place it in a separate bin and then being selected for secondary screening and then--well, I was a little flustered after being groped by the GED trained agent and ran off without it--at least, I remembered my laptop and my shoes, haha! I'm sure you paid a handsome sum to the TSA for it, so anything I can do to help you out would be my pleasure.

    3. Re:Apple Watch by RespekMyAthorati · · Score: 1

      Apple Watches turn up on occasion, and I purchased two. The first one was activation locked.

      Shouldn't you have checked that before you bought it?

  41. Blame the other guy by pedz · · Score: 1

    Why not just have signs at the donation boxes asking the people donating the phones to unlock and wipe them? Seems like this is just an example of poor PR by the charity groups asking for phones.

  42. Re:Apple doesn't care by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    >Sounds like the company needs to learn how to properly deploy corporate-managed iPhones.

    Pretend you said "car" instead of "iPhone."

  43. One enviromental law we need by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    One environmental law we need is: When you own something, you have the right to use it.

    A manufacturer MUST unlock it for free on demand.

    A manufacturer MUST NOT disable legacy systems.

    A software company MUST NOT charge extra for environmentally friendly features, like Multi-Point Services in Windows.

    A software company MUST reactivate all legally owned software for free on demand.

    The penalty for any violation should be 10x the MSRP of the product, or 10x the highest known selling price of the product, whichever is more.

    And a test: FUCK THE PIGS!

  44. Re: Apple doesn't care by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Through what, a payroll deduction? Say hello to a Glassdoor score of 1.5/5.0. May not even be legal. Either way, that would be a terrible idea; penny wise and pound foolish.

  45. What a bunch of fucking haters by mveloso · · Score: 1

    People here are ignoring the fact that pretty much everything except the battery, the logic board, and the Touch ID parts of an iPhone get reused.

    Jesus Christ, you'd think from reading this that Apple literally shreds locked iPhones. In fact, iPhones probably are recycled more than any other phone because of the fact that its parts are ultra-valuable.

    1. Re:What a bunch of fucking haters by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      citation required for the spewing of non-checked "facts" by apple zealots

  46. Re:Apple doesn't care by swimboy · · Score: 1

    If your company has deployed enough iPhones to have hundreds returned by former employees, I'm gobsmacked that you're not using an MDM tool of some sort. And if you are using MDM and it's not letting you unlock your company's phones, you're not doing it right.

    --
    Ask me how the Heisenberg Principle may or may not have saved my life.
  47. Re:Apple doesn't care by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

    We have hundreds of iPhones returned by former employees that are unusable because of this. Apple refuses to unlock them even though they belong to the company. I'm surprised they are allowed to get away with this in a corporate environment but I guess the RDF is still strong enough because they keep buying them.

    I'm surprised they are allowed to get away with this in your corporate environment, but whoever's making the purchasing decisions is obviously either corrupt or stupid (there's no third option.)

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  48. Re:Apple doesn't care by gnasher719 · · Score: 1

    We have hundreds of iPhones returned by former employees that are unusable because of this.

    A friend of mine complained because she has about half a dozen unusable phones. There are some very simple steps that the employee has to do before returning his phone. I don't know what the legal situation is if the employee doesn't do that. But also, you can call Apple to sell you phones that are bound to your company. The company can reset them at any time, and they can't be reset to be used outside the company.

  49. Re:Apple doesn't care by gnasher719 · · Score: 1

    I wonder if Apple has a way to unlock them. When they swap phones out for warranty reasons, for example, they refurb the old one and give it to someone else. The one you get as a warranty replacement is often a refurb.

    They ask you to erase your phone before exchanging it. They will also strongly advise you to make a backup first, so your new phone can be restored quite quickly. If your phone is not in a state where you can erase it (like if it doesn't react to any keypress), that's bad luck for Apple.

  50. Should consider the pawn shop model, IMO .... by King_TJ · · Score: 1

    Where I work, we used to deploy new iPads to all new full-time employees, when they started a division that developed software apps for the platform. We wound up with a number of useless paperweights when employees turned them in upon leaving but neglected to follow our instructions to unlock them for us first.

    Since then, sure -- we implemented tools to manage them ourselves with MDM, so that problem is behind us. (Heck, we stopped issuing them out anyway - because we restructured things and no longer do that app development.)

    But I agree that the locked devices create a lot of senseless e-waste. No matter how simple Apple makes the process for someone to deauthorize/unlock it before before passing it on to the next person -- there are going to be a lot of situations where that step just doesn't happen.

    It's frustrating that Apple (and for that matter, all the Android phones that do the same thing with Google logins) assume "Theft!" as the immediate go-to answer. I'd prefer theft to be something NOT assumed until they're told one happened. EG. Keep the current system in place BUT allow anyone to call in or email the right people to request it be unlocked for re-activation. If there's not a flag on that device's serial number saying someone already reported it stolen, do the unlock.

    Pawn shops handled this, long ago, by requiring you give them your drivers' license to photocopy and keep on file whenever you pawn something. Then, if it turns out you gave them stolen merchandise, they know who to go back to. Apple, Samsung and others could do that same -- keeping your info on file as the one who requested the unlock.

    1. Re:Should consider the pawn shop model, IMO .... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's apple's fault you improperly managed your devices. Got it.

    2. Re:Should consider the pawn shop model, IMO .... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's apple's fault you improperly managed your devices. Got it.

      People don't buy $50,000 electronics without understanding it or liaising with someone qualified who can guide them. But $500? There is NO device management training whatsoever required to purchase a computer*, and info really ISN'T discoverable even to regular joes who are interested and don't know where to start.

      Smartphones are an Android majority (~80%). The account lock features from the OS are fairly new there (for Android 5.1 at least, where 40% of phones out just two winters ago were still 4.4 or worse), so how often are users expected to bother to be re-trained? and where? and by who? and how would those trainers notify them?

      Until licenses and re-training become a real demand, it's not the users' onus. Silicon Valley expectations that Tribal knowledge will somehow be acquired by users of all ages and backgrounds is a huge problem that goes under the radar.

      Android phones baffle iOS users (heard an app team manager spending 10 minutes wondering where the "back" button is, exactly... lack of Apple hardware ecosystem integration giving cheap devices a yucky rep, and crapshoot feature support across OEMs compared to knowing that ALL iPhones have OS updates and dual-band wifi...), and iOS phones baffle Android users (hint: Bluetooth sharing is NOT a thing, the soft keyboard UI rules are infuriating, and there are tribal gestures for everything because the ethos of having a single or ZERO soft buttons requires a workaround for usability)

      There is too much to learn. Phones do NOT come with actual OS manuals --iOS has an optional one, I've heard, but it's in software somewhere and people ignore it with as much studious avoidance as Joe Public does click-thru TOS and EULAs.

      * It would do the world much good if there were demands of a basic understanding of web etiquette / safety, file management and light hardware maintenance. This should be parallel to the rigors of competency that young and old drivers already must prove as qualifier for the privileges and issues tied to driver's-license ownership.

      Ignorance and carelessness is proving to have a large cost, so the untrained aren't allowed behind the wheel because of lives they endanger. Computers ownership is unregulated and though impact is indirectly physical, the dangers are to one self in the form of increasing identity fraud, poor understanding of turing machines, and LOTS of wasted money when folks ruin a device thru ignorance.

    3. Re:Should consider the pawn shop model, IMO .... by King_TJ · · Score: 1

      You're sure quick to call me ignorant without knowing anything about my personal experience dealing with the subject?

      For the record though? Yes, on multiple occasions, I went through the process of contacting Apple to get a device unlocked. In those cases, I was eventually able to get it done in 2 of 3 situations encountered -- but it was not easy or quick, by any means.

      When it was successful, it involved me contacting my account manager at the company who originally sold our company the iPad, and having them contact the rep at Apple, so they could provide Apple with proof that we did, indeed, purchase it through them. (It's a lot less convoluted if you purchased from Apple direct, but that's often not the smartest financial decision, when almost all the other vendors are more likely to have discounted prices on their items.) Then, we had to wait at least a week to two weeks for Apple to get around to actually unlocking the device for us.

      In the case where I wasn't successful, it was because Apple claimed to have no record that we purchased the product, and we couldn't turn up suitable proof that we did either. (Very likely, this was a "one off" purchase that someone in I.T. made using a corporate credit card when it was needed in a rush for a last minute hire. It would be kind of a needle in a haystack trying to sift through every credit card purchase made by the I.T. staff over a time window when it would most likely have been purchased. Wasn't worth the hassle for an old, now obsolete model of iPad that had a mostly worn out battery in it anyway.)

      With Android devices, I have real recent experience and frustration trying to help a neighbor out. His son had a new Android phone that he was locked out of. Looks to me like a hacker got ahold of his Gmail login and changed the password to it, effectively locking him out of the phone which was prompting for said password in order to reset it. Google was utterly useless in assisting. They just have an automated system that promises it will forward your info on to someone to consider resetting your account if you provide sufficient evidence you really owned the original account. It asked for a few things like the month and year the Gmail account was first set up. (How many people remember that, I wonder? This guy actually knew because he made the account somewhat recently, just for his kid to use....) Still, after a month of trying to get help with it, Google never reset it for him so the phone's still a paperweight.

      I did find a few hackers who offer the service of unlocking these phones for a $10 or so fee. I may point him that direction.... But it's crazy you have to rely on hackers and pay them to unlock devices that the companies involved with locking them refuse to help with.

  51. Re: Apple doesn't care by Code+Herder · · Score: 1

    There is similar partitioning on ios. The firm I work for can remote erase my phone, etc

  52. That's not a problem by nospam007 · · Score: 1

    "because phones that are legitimately obtained often still have iCloud enabled, making that phone useless except for parts. "

    That's exactly why we like it. If you steal our phone, you'll have an old battery and a replacement screen and if it's mine, the screen will be cracked on top.

    1. Re:That's not a problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I never understood why the systemic problem of iPhone screen cracks that is so well accepted by Apple users (who paid too much to just dump the phone) is almost unheard of with Android hardware. The irony is that Android devices are hundreds of dollars cheaper and come from shady companies with tons of different physical configurations.

  53. Re: Apple doesn't care by swillden · · Score: 1

    There is similar partitioning on ios. The firm I work for can remote erase my phone, etc

    Remote erase your whole phone, or just the work part? I hadn't heard that iOS had acquired anything comparable to the Android work profile, and some quick googling just turned up comments about how it was needed. Am I missing something or are you mistaken?

    --
    Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
  54. Re:Apple doesn't care by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    >Sounds like the company needs to learn how to properly deploy corporate-managed iPhones.

    Pretend you said "car" instead of "iPhone."

    So your company allows employees to change the keys on their company car? Or are you just pretending to understand the issue?

  55. Re:Apple doesn't care by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We have hundreds of iPhones returned by former employees that are unusable because of this.

    But also, you can call Apple to sell you phones that are bound to your company. The company can reset them at any time, and they can't be reset to be used outside the company.

    Someone else upthread said there is a recurring fee for this. In a world where non-corporate phones are cheaper to purchase and do a one-time setup that comes out much cheaper and with no extra monthly costs to gain that level of control, that'll be the path of least resistance.

    Sadly, there's even lower resistance in allowing all staff to carry whatever phone they want in a Bring-your-own-device setup. I work in tech and many employees are perfectly happy because they can upgrade their property any time they succumb to the latest shiny fad instead of having to wait in line for their 3-year corporate replacement phone to be approved. And with personal phones, people feel at ease blocking all calls out of hours, which isn't so easy to justify for the phone the employer is funding on a monthly basis to keep you in under the always-reachable yoke.

  56. Re:Apple doesn't care by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You are lying or your IT department is inept.

    Apple specifically has a program for corporate, mass-purchased phones. Enroll them in the MDM program and corporate IT can remove the lock no matter which employee locks the phone.

    It has little to do with incompetence. There is a reoccurring cost for this.

  57. Re:Apple doesn't care by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You can take an iOS device with the proof of purchase to any Apple store, and they will remove the iCloud activation lock.

  58. Simple solution so Apple won't use it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's not at all hard for Apple to solve this...when someone goes to donate their phone just allow for a complete reset that requires iCloud password to completely reset the phone...how freaking hard is that?

    1. Re:Simple solution so Apple won't use it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's bitztream the autism-hating, custom EpiPen-hating, Musk-hating, Qualcomm-hating, Firefox tabs-hating, Slashdot editors-hating Slashdot troll!

  59. Re: Apple doesn't care by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That is exactly what my former company, which treated its employees like adults instead of overgrown children, did. You better believe I returned my iPhone after factory reset, unlocked, lest I be docked £500 for a 2 year old iPhone from my final paycheck.

  60. How's life in the hypocrite lane?

  61. Re:Apple doesn't care by GrandCow · · Score: 1

    Is the pile of useless phones that now have to be replaced not worth the MDM cost?

    --
    "Well kids, you tried your best, and you failed. The lesson is, never try." -Homer Simpson