Slashdot Mirror


Amazon Helps Cops Set Up Package Theft Sting Operations (vice.com)

An anonymous reader quotes Motherboard: In response to Amazon packages being stolen from people's doorsteps, police departments around the country have set up sting operations that use fake packages bugged with GPS trackers to find and arrest people who steal packages. Internal emails and documents obtained by Motherboard via a public records request show how Amazon and one police department partnered to set up one of these operations.

The documents obtained by Motherboard -- which include an operations plan and internal emails between Amazon and the Hayward, California Police Department -- show that Amazon's "national package theft team" made several calls to the Hayward Police Department and sent the department packages, tape, and stickers that allowed the department to set up a "porch pirate" operation in November and December of 2018... Several other cities around the country -- including Aurora, Colorado; Albuquerque, New Mexico; Jersey City, New Jersey; and Hayward, California -- have also conducted porch pirate sting operations aided by Amazon. Jersey City, New Jersey -- like Hayward, California -- put GPS-tracking devices inside the dummy packages. Aurora and Albuquerque, meanwhile, used doorbell cameras from Ring -- which is owned by Amazon -- to capture video footage and surveil for theft.

65 of 135 comments (clear)

  1. Better plan by religionofpeas · · Score: 1, Insightful

    I have a better plan: Amazon talks to their shipping partner and tells them to ring the doorbell and actually deliver the package to a person, instead of leaving it on the porch. And if they're not paying enough for that, they should pay them more.

    1. Re:Better plan by timeOday · · Score: 2

      Disagree. Having to be home to get packages would be a huge pain for me. Whereas if porch piracy were shut down (at substantial cost and inconvenience), the people who do it would just start stealing by other means.

    2. Re: Better plan by TuballoyThunder · · Score: 2

      That works great if you live and work in your Mom's basement.

      In all seriousness, street addressing for PO Boxes or mailbox providers is in the only reliable way to go if nobody is typically home.
    3. Re:Better plan by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Whereas if porch piracy were shut down (at substantial cost and inconvenience), the people who do it would just start stealing by other means.

      Most theft happens because the theif thinks she will get away with it. The shock of getting caught often causes a fundamental change in behavior. My younger sister used to shoplift. When she got caught, she cried for days. The shop did not even press charges.

    4. Re: Better plan by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Amazon already had locker service. Just not anywhere outside of major cities.

    5. Re:Better plan by kenh · · Score: 3, Informative

      Have the packages delivered to a drop-off point where you can pick them up later.

      They offer this already - Amazon Pick-up Location

      --
      Ken
    6. Re:Better plan by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I'm happy to pay taxes for catching criminals.

    7. Re: Better plan by kenh · · Score: 2

      Probably deployed where they own actual real estate and where theft rate is highest.

      --
      Ken
    8. Re: Better plan by cantubury · · Score: 1

      You can have stuff delivered directly to your car to your boat your airplane or I guess even your spaceship are use the Amazon lockers at the whole foods is only a couple blocks in my

    9. Re:Better plan by KiloByte · · Score: 4, Interesting

      In Poland, we have a dense network of "packomates" -- lock boxes that you receive a pick up code for. There's a packomate within 2-3 street segments of every place I needed a package delivered to.

      Then, a competing carrier instead signed a contract with a widespread chain of convenience stores. This was spurred by the govt banning shops from being open on Sundays -- except for churches, gas stations, post offices, etc. The way the law was written, a convenience store that you can send packages to/from does count as a post office -- which, after a series of lawsuits, stuck. Other carriers followed suit and now you can pick up packages at several store chains -- as the contracts are not exclusive, effectively every of those stores serves each of the carriers, providing a very dense network.

      To-door deliveries not only are ~3 times as expensive and tend to take longer, but suffer from the porch pirate issue you mention. No wonder hardly anyone uses them anymore. Problem solved.

      --
      The creatures outside looked from Alt-Right to Antifa; but already it was impossible to say which was which.
    10. Re:Better plan by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 1

      the people who do it would just start stealing by other means.

      Most crime is opportunistic. If you remove the opportunity, you remove the crime.

      It is a fallacy to believe there is a "fixed" amount of crime that is just shifted around by enforcement.

      If porch piracy is deterred, some thieves may look for other criminal opportunities (likely with a worse cost-benefit), but others will decide it isn't worth it, and get honest jobs instead.

    11. Re:Better plan by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 2

      Also, the taxpayer ends up picking up the bill for the extra police activity.

      That is what taxes are for.

    12. Re: Better plan by silverkniveshotmail. · · Score: 2

      Just let the taxpayer deal with the problem

      The problem is stealing, stealing is a crime, I don't see the problem.

    13. Re:Better plan by RhettLivingston · · Score: 2

      That is the wrong business decision. It is cheaper for Amazon to just take the loss.

      Even retail stores like Walmart routinely write-off over 10% of their goods due to theft and fraud because it is cheaper to do so. If they buckled down, they could stop it, but the cost of doing so plus the fact that far fewer would shop there because of the inconveniences makes it a losing deal. This is why they don't even do simple things like open a box up and see what's in it when you make a return. Legit customers don't like being questioned.

      In Amazon's case, if you both increase the delivery cost and make delivery inconvenient for the consumer, the losses would outweigh the gains.

      They aren't stupid. They very carefully experiment with and measure these things to determine the sweet spot in the loss prevention cost vs. benefit equation.

      It is very unlikely that they have any plans to expand this GPS sting thing. The purpose here is more likely on the prevention side. They are trying to create some publicity to make the least intelligent thieves that are working alone think twice.

    14. Re:Better plan by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 2

      ring the doorbell and actually deliver the package to a person

      You can sign up for delivery alerts.

      You will get a notification on your cell a few seconds after the deliverer scans the barcode and drops the package on your porch.

    15. Re:Better plan by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 3, Informative

      Of course if hub pickup became commonplace there would be nice long lines for extra fun.

      There is no line. You get a locker # and code by text or email. You enter the code on the keypad and your locker pops open. It is a parallel process, so no queueing is needed.

    16. Re:Better plan by dfm3 · · Score: 1

      Seriously, why can't Amazon just work with their shipping partners to implement a user preference that gets passed on to the delivery truck operator. When I check out online, let me choose between "only deliver to a live person", "ring/knock but heave package on porch" and "leave package quietly".

    17. Re:Better plan by Fringe · · Score: 2

      This is B.S. You are assuming all people are essentially chaotic-neutral, and that an opportunity automatically results in crime. In short, you are BLAMING THE VICTIM.

      A more educated response would be to acknowledge that SOME people commit MOST of the crimes. Use this lower-hanging fruit as a mechanism for purging the rotten apples, rather than your approach of blaming society for creating an opportunity.

    18. Re:Better plan by cdsparrow · · Score: 1

      Good luck with that. The amazon delivery folks around here pretty much suck. One of em delivered a package to our work, left it out on the sidewalk in front of our door instead of walking in. Mind you, one of my coworkers was standing there watching this through the glass doors and windows. How hard is it to open a door and at least throw the package inside instead of outside?

    19. Re: Better plan by phantomfive · · Score: 2

      They seem to be deployed mainly inside grocery stores and even some new apartment buildings. They don't take much room, they are like lockers. I don't think Amazon owns any of the real estate. It is probably cost effective because they can drop it all off at one location, instead of individually to eacch address.

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    20. Re:Better plan by fazig · · Score: 1

      "Most crime is" vs "You are assuming all people".
      Can you spot the difference here?

    21. Re:Better plan by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Great idea, but poor execution. My city has a single Amazon pickup location and it is extremely inconvenient - over ten miles from my house in an area without free parking.

      Meanwhile, both UPS and FexEx have numerous pickup locations in my city. Both have locations a convenient 2-3 miles from my house with plenty of free parking.

    22. Re:Better plan by djinn6 · · Score: 1

      That's a non-starter. I'm not going to drive 30 minutes to pick up a package if it cost me more in gas, tolls and parking than simply having it shipped to my house (ignoring free shipping).

    23. Re:Better plan by xenobyte · · Score: 1

      Whereas if porch piracy were shut down (at substantial cost and inconvenience), the people who do it would just start stealing by other means.

      Most theft happens because the theif thinks she will get away with it.

      Yes and no. Theft happens because people has a bad moral and think he or she can get away with it.

      It may have tones of thought police but I've always felt that stings and entrapment are the way to go to get people with bad morals to reveal themselves as the criminals they are or will be given the right circumstances - and have them prosecuted.

      --
      "For every complex problem, there is a solution that is simple, neat, and wrong." -- H.L. Mencken (1880-1956) --
    24. Re:Better plan by parkinglot777 · · Score: 1

      Furthermore, you can use it to do the return as well. Much more convenient and safer if there is one near by you.

  2. Felony by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Let me guess... cops wouldn't be wasting time on minor misdemeanors stings. They'll be planting items in the box which has value that meet or exceed the felony level charges.

    1. Re:Felony by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Good. Teach people to keep their hands off of other people's stuff. It's not asking that much.

  3. What bother's me about this by rsilvergun · · Score: 4, Interesting

    is there's way more wage theft (not, "I got paid less than I deserve" but "I got paid less than I was legally owed") than robbery but we've got around 1000 cops nationwide pounding that beat and several hundred thousand on robbery.

    For this you can't even argue there's the risk of violence. Package theft if done while no one is looking.

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
    1. Re:What bother's me about this by classiclantern · · Score: 3, Interesting

      There are a couple of things about this that bother me. If the package was delivered by the US Postal Service (USPS) then the theft is a Federal crime. Why are city police sticking their nose into it. The victim most likely does not even live in the same state and there is no "victim". When my $14 package of screws was stolen I had some very nice video of the "Ass-crack Bandit" as he came to known. The Post Office was not interested in seeing my video, nor was my local police. I reported to Amazon that my package had not been delivered to "me" and they refunded my money. I'm not the victim. Amazon reports the loss to their insurance provider and Amazon is reimbursed. Amazon is not the victim. The only "victim" I can come-up with are the many thousands of companies that buy loss insurance, which they would have to do even if there were no thieves. There would still be lost packages.

      --
      Now that I said that, I fell better.
    2. Re:What bother's me about this by kenh · · Score: 1

      Well, perhaps the victims of "wage theft" should start reporting their "stolen" wages to the authorities. Ever heard the saying "squeaky wheel gets the oil"? People complain when thier packages are stolen, wage theft victims likely don't follow-up with their employer, let alone file claims with the proper state body.

      --
      Ken
    3. Re:What bother's me about this by kenh · · Score: 1, Offtopic

      Bank bailouts were repaid - most recipients wanted to refuse the money, many paid it all back as soon as permitted.

      In 2010 the federal government took over federally-guaranteed student loans, and the amount borrowed/owed to gov't ballooned from $150BN to $1.5TN under the careful management of the federal government - I imagine similar "success" were the federal government to take over, rather than just merely regulate, banks.

      --
      Ken
    4. Re:What bother's me about this by quonset · · Score: 1

      Bank bailouts were repaid

      Which misses the point entirely. The bailouts shouldn't have happened in the first place. Just because Jamie Dimon realized he, Lloyd Blankfein, and a host of others royally screwed the pooch and said the government has to do something, does not mean the government has to do something. Considering these people were supposedly the "best and brightest" and being paid millions each year because of their experience, they should have seen piling debt upon debt was completely unsustainable. Not to mention slicing and dicing mortgages and selling them when they had no clue if the underlying mortgage was even valid.

      That isn't capitalism. It's closer to fascism and in a way, is a form of socialism.

    5. Re:What bother's me about this by Solandri · · Score: 2

      We have an entire branch of the Federal government with 17,000 employees dedicated to fighting wage theft. You can argue they're not doing a good enough job, or that the victims aren't reporting the crime enough. But it's hardly unaddressed.

      Also, your source seems to have cherry picked specific robbery statistics to try to push their narrative. According to the FBI, robberies cost $465 million in 2016, nearly double the wage theft your source specifies.

    6. Re:What bother's me about this by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 2

      The bailouts shouldn't have happened in the first place.

      There were no bailouts in 1929.

      So now we have dealt with financial crises both with, and without, "bailouts" (government provided liquidity).

      Which worked better?

    7. Re:What bother's me about this by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 1

      Replacing failed banks is!

      The banks did not "fail".

      They had liquidity problems, not solvency problems.

      Jimmy Stewart explains the difference far better than I can.

      The bank "bailout' was the right thing to do, and we should be grateful that enough politicians had the moral courage to support it in the face of populist outrage from economic illiterates.

    8. Re:What bother's me about this by russotto · · Score: 1

      There are a couple of things about this that bother me. If the package was delivered by the US Postal Service (USPS) then the theft is a Federal crime.

      Once the package is on the doorstep, it's delivered and no longer a Federal crime to steal it.

      Amazon reports the loss to their insurance provider and Amazon is reimbursed. Amazon is not the victim.

      Are you sure Amazon doesn't self-insure?

    9. Re:What bother's me about this by GuB-42 · · Score: 1

      Apple and oranges.
      "Wage theft" is civil law. It is you against your employer, and it is about contract matters. You know exactly who to accuse. You need lawyers on your side more than you need cops.
      Package theft is criminal law. You don't know who stole your package, and you need cops to catch the thief.

    10. Re:What bother's me about this by fuzznutz · · Score: 1

      Once the package is on the doorstep, it's delivered and no longer a Federal crime to steal it.

      I'm not so sure that is the case. You can be charged with a Federal crime stealing mail out of a mailbox. I certainly wouldn't want to be the one to test this theory anyway.

  4. So? by onyxruby · · Score: 2

    Unless your a porch pirate, how could this possibly cause trouble? Police work with companies all the time to help stop theft and fraud. Why is this news?

    1. Re:So? by kenh · · Score: 1

      In order for a "porch thief" to be put away for life under a "three strikes" sentencing guideline, they'd have to, you know, commit three violent felonies, and theft of a package is not typically a violent felony by any metric I'm aware of.

      --
      Ken
    2. Re:So? by kenh · · Score: 1

      No, it isn't. It's not even close. The parallel would be a deli with cold cuts or a bakery with cakes and bread on display in the window and a hungry person walks by.

      In your example you have hungry people, actual food, and food is a basic requirement for life. No one "needs" whatever is in an amazon box on your porch to live.

      --
      Ken
    3. Re:So? by raftpeople · · Score: 1

      It targets people that steal.

    4. Re:So? by PPH · · Score: 1

      who happens to notice a low hanging fruit

      Because low income people spend their time cruising through neighborhoods, checking out porches just for kicks. But when some insensitive clod happens to have an expensive looking package sitting there, they can't help themselves.

      --
      Have gnu, will travel.
  5. Locking mailbox by bradley13 · · Score: 1

    This is fine, but really - with mail order now being so common - everyone really needs a locking mailbox that accepts packages. These exist, assuming the delivery people are smart enough to use them. Granted, you can't fit a huge package in them, but most will fit.

    --
    Enjoy life! This is not a dress rehearsal.
  6. Re:Better plan - Darn Straight by sehlat · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Have the packages delivered to a drop-off point where you can pick them up later.

    THIS is why my family has paid for a professional drop box for over thirty years.

    We discovered that some checks delivered to our home were simply left behind the shrubs next to the front door, and had been there for two weeks, since we don't usually use or check the front door.

    It's a touch over $200/year, and totally worth every penny.

  7. No, original plan is better. by luis_a_espinal · · Score: 2

    I have a better plan: Amazon talks to their shipping partner and tells them to ring the doorbell and actually deliver the package to a person, instead of leaving it on the porch. And if they're not paying enough for that, they should pay them more.

    Bad idea. Stealing packages out of my front door is no different from stealing mail out of my mailbox, and I shouldn't have to be forking extra money in my shipping costs so that Amazon can pay shipping companies the xtra cost of face-to-face delivery.

    Additionally, for many of us who are out of homes most of the day, it is extremely inconvenient to have to limit our purchases to face-to-face deliveries only. This is an inane requirement that can not be easily met by the average customer. Just think about it.

    I understand the possible implications (the ever present slippery slope of a big tech behemoth partnering with law enforcing agencies, but I find this to be an splendid idea.

    It's either that or us customers having to mount security/honey-pot-package systems to track theft of our own purchases at an extra cost just because some fuckers can't help themselves with other people's shit.

    I'm not a fan of some of Amazon's practices, but I'm on board with this.

    1. Re:No, original plan is better. by pauljlucas · · Score: 1

      Stealing packages out of my front door is no different from stealing mail out of my mailbox...

      Stealing US Postal mail, unlike stealing non-USPS packages, is a felony prosecuted by the feds. FYI.

      --
      If you reply, do so only to what I explicitly wrote. If I didn't write it, don't assume or infer it.
    2. Re:No, original plan is better. by demonlapin · · Score: 1

      If you have the option, get it delivered to your workplace. This is my standard method for anything of significant value. A secretary is always there to sign for it and hold it until I can run it to my car.

    3. Re:No, original plan is better. by parkinglot777 · · Score: 1

      Not necessary. My boss bought stuff on Amazon and let them deliver to the office all the time. On occasion (rare but noticeable), the delivery guy left the package "outside" at the entrance of the building instead of coming into the building and to our office. What would you do about that?

    4. Re:No, original plan is better. by luis_a_espinal · · Score: 1

      Stealing packages out of my front door is no different from stealing mail out of my mailbox...

      Stealing US Postal mail, unlike stealing non-USPS packages, is a felony prosecuted by the feds. FYI.

      I know. The thing is, it is a lot easier to track things stolen off one's doorstep than from a mailbox located further out. I have cameras that can check who steals them off my doorstep, but I can't (physically) have the same set up for my mailbox.

      Having Amazon (or Ebay or whoever sends me packages) work with LEOs to tackle this problem, I embrace, even though I acknowledge the icky factor of big companies partnering up with law agencies in the form of tracking.

    5. Re:No, original plan is better. by luis_a_espinal · · Score: 1

      If you have the option, get it delivered to your workplace. This is my standard method for anything of significant value. A secretary is always there to sign for it and hold it until I can run it to my car.

      Yes, this is what I do whenever I have an employer that lets me. It's the best option.

      Also, Amazon also have pick up places not far away from my house, but not necessarily in my way of commuting. It's a toss-up.

  8. An LPR camera would do more good by timholman · · Score: 1

    In rural or suburban areas, porch pirates usually drive their own vehicles. I've seen dozens of videos of porch pirates stealing packages and then hopping into a car. But without the license plate, it's not enough for the police to find them.

    Set up a license plate reader (LPR) camera, and you can give the cops something to work with. That assumes, of course, that the police will bother to take action even with the license plate.

    1. Re:An LPR camera would do more good by Solandri · · Score: 2

      Can't comment about porch pirates in particular. But I manage a commercial building in a strip mall, and set up video cameras to help fight robberies of our tenants. I got high-resolution 4k+ cameras, and positioned them so they can easily read license plates of passing cars. When there's a robbery, we turn the license plate numbers over to the police. Most of the time it turns out the vehicle was stolen. One time the thieves had put paper dealer tags (the kind you get with a new car before it's issued a license plate) in place of the license plates (either that or they'd stolen a new car off a dealer's lot).

      In other words, right now porch pirates probably drive their own vehicle because there's very little risk of them being caught. If police start to crack down on them using things like license plate readers, they'll adapt and start doing their crime with a stolen vehicle, or a vehicle dressed up to look like it's new so it doesn't have plates yet. I'm doubtful even a GPS locator will help, since that will just make them open the package inside the car instead of at home. Cameras to get a clear image of their face would seem to work, but at our building I've noticed they know where the cameras are and take care to hide their face (usually a hat, sunglasses, bandanna, or coat pulled up over their face).

      So there's no simple one-shot solution to catching the crooks. You'd be entering a protracted arms race, where each side will try to one-up each other to catch / avoid being caught. The simpler solution would seem to be one-way drop-doors like you find in mailboxes. The package deliveryman and just drop the package inside, and it'll fall into your garage or (for an apartment) a holding room.

    2. Re:An LPR camera would do more good by djinn6 · · Score: 1

      The simpler solution would seem to be one-way drop-doors like you find in mailboxes. The package deliveryman and just drop the package inside, and it'll fall into your garage or (for an apartment) a holding room.

      That would require infrastructure changes, which wouldn't work in crowded locations. It's also expensive, ugly and limited in size.

      So there's no simple one-shot solution to catching the crooks. You'd be entering a protracted arms race, where each side will try to one-up each other to catch / avoid being caught.

      Yes there is. Simply booby-trap the boxes to go off when someone tries to move them. It can be done with a Raspberry Pi and an accelerometer, or just some strings glued to the porch if you're into low-tech. If they're going to steal the box, they can't get around moving it.

  9. Next up: Package thieves change MO by PinkyGigglebrain · · Score: 1

    Current Modus operandi;
    walk up to door,
    pick up package,
    walk away,
    profit!

    Now it will be

    Walk up to door,
    pickup package,
    walk away,
    stuff into heavy Mylar bag to block GPS and Cell signals.
    Profit!

    1. Re:Next up: Package thieves change MO by AHuxley · · Score: 1

      AC A new walk in Faraday tent is ready back at the inner city apartment?

      --
      Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
    2. Re:Next up: Package thieves change MO by serviscope_minor · · Score: 1

      stuff into heavy Mylar bag to block GPS and Cell signals.

      Foil coated mylar bag. Mylar itself is mechanically altered PET (the stuff drinks bottles are made from) and doesn't block anything on its own.

      --
      SJW n. One who posts facts.
  10. Should include GPS tracking in all high-value ship by JoeyRox · · Score: 1

    This would not only increase the coverage of finding thieves but also serve to discourage future thefts once word got out. Customers can return to GPS devices back to Amazon at either a local lockbox/Whole Foods or mail them back if necessary with a prepaid label.

  11. Because they are Amazon? by RhettLivingston · · Score: 4, Interesting

    We've recently seen stories in which a Tesla had video of a man breaking the window that included his face and license plate and where video doorbells were filming those that stole them. In both of those stories, the police had little to no interest in pursuing the case.

    In both cases there was also a high probability that the individuals had committed strings of those crimes. Catching the individuals could prevent a lot of theft and damage. It is very possible they have priors and could get very significant time. If not, given that they know who is doing things, they should be able to do a bit of police work and prove the pattern. Who knows, perhaps they'll have a pile of doorbells in their home ready to sell on E-Bay or a little surveillance on the car could catch them doing other drive-by Tesla break-ins.

    In both of those cases, I saw many responses on comment sites with worse things that police didn't care to pursue including grand theft auto and night-time residential B&Es.

    I've personally had night-time B&Es twice. In both cases I knew who did them. One was an officer and another was someone who had a restraining order against them. Both managed to leave blood evidence. In both cases, the police didn't feel the case worth the time and cost of pursuit. My interpretation was that I was not in upper class neighborhoods where these things matter.

    Yet, Amazon is able to get them to spend time on package theft? Why? Are they also paying them or giving a kickback perhaps? Just because they are Amazon? Citizens don't matter but companies do? What's the deal?

    1. Re:Because they are Amazon? by Chozabu · · Score: 2

      It also sounds like they contacted the police multiple times before managing to go ahead, the first bunch of attempts probably failed

  12. Re:Folks don't realize 2008 was a wealth transfers by Cmdln+Daco · · Score: 2, Insightful

    We borrowed money to bail out the corrupt trade unions at General Motors.

  13. Cops don't care by WolfgangVL · · Score: 2

    The magic words are "DRUGS" and "GUNS" That's what motivates our for profit police, things they can seize. Anything else is just incidental.

    --
    You are being ripped off every second of every day, so that advertisers can help rip you off even more tomorrow.
  14. Counter surveillance... by VeryFluffyBunny · · Score: 1

    Amazon already sells a way to prevent radio tracking from devices hidden inside delivery boxes: https://www.amazon.com/s?k=myl... Thieves can bring the boxes back to a room that is also RF shielded, remove the RF tracking devices, deactivate them, & sell them on Amazon & Ebay.

    I think a better solution is for Amazon & its customers to stop creating tempting opportunities for theft out in the world we all have to live in. I don't want Amazon to encourage thieves to patrol my neighbourhood looking for opportunities. It's just a really bad idea.

    --
    Debate is a form of harassment. Do not question my truth.
  15. Deterrence by stikves · · Score: 2

    I had my packages stolen, and then started having them delivered to my work location and/or amazon lockers when available. It is inconvenient, however safer.

    The main driver of the issue is that police will not have the resources to look at small crimes. In fact, it seems like they will not be able to prosecute if the item costs less than $1000 or so: https://www.latimes.com/opinio...

    The thieves know this, and they would not care even if they get caught. This is not a good thing for our society. If we do not have resources to prosecute them we should at least put some method of discouragement. Community service, or financial penalties, or some another method to prevent future thefts.

    Otherwise we would essentially give up the sanctuary of homes, and hence civilized society.

  16. You're presenting a false binary choice by rsilvergun · · Score: 1

    yes, the bailouts were better than nothing, but there were much better alternatives to both. The first is stopping out of control gambling on the part of massive banking institutions in the first place. But failing that we can provide bail out from the other end of the equation: the individual borrowers. For example, the government could have bought people's mortgages at low or zero interest to the borrower, allowing people to keep their homes while keeping the economy strong. And if all else fails, rather than just handing out money we can buy out the failing companies, nationalize them, then privatize them later when the economy calms down.

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/