Slashdot Mirror


Dragons, Nuclear Weapons, and Game of Thrones (thebulletin.org)

Slashdot reader Dan Drollette shared this article from the Bulletin of Atomic Scientists where a specialist in nuclear security analyzes Game of Thones, citing dragons "as living, fire-breathing metaphors for nuclear weapons." Despite the fantasy setting, the story teaches a great deal about the inherent dangers that come with managing these game-changing agents, their propensity for accidents, the relative benefits they grant their masters, and the strain these weapons impose upon those wielding them. "Dragons are the nuclear deterrent, and only [Daenerys Targaryen, one of the series' heroines] has them, which in some ways makes her the most powerful person in the world," George R. R. Martin said in 2011. "But is that sufficient? These are the kind of issues I'm trying to explore.

"The United States right now has the ability to destroy the world with our nuclear arsenal, but that doesn't mean we can achieve specific geopolitical goals. Power is more subtle than that. You can have the power to destroy, but it doesn't give you the power to reform, or improve, or build."

It makes for a bleak outlook. Or, as a character repeatedly warns in the first episode: "Winter is coming."

86 comments

  1. Trash by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Way to ride a trending hashtag to a semblance of relevance.

    1. Re: Trash by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Slashdot has most definitely not jumped the shark, but it has been throughly teabagged by the dragon.

    2. Re: Trash by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The last two fake news "stories" have been on "Game of Thrones" topic.
       
      Obvious paid SEO is obvious.

    3. Re: Trash by stealth_finger · · Score: 1

      Slashdot has most definitely not jumped the shark, but it has been throughly teabagged by the dragon.

      Slashdot has not only jumped the shark, it's now rotten driftwood washed up on some godforsaken beach in the middle of nowhere.

      --
      Wanna buy a shirt?
      https://www.redbubble.com/people/stealthfinger/shop?asc=u
    4. Re: Trash by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, this year is the 15th anniversary of Slashdot jumping the shark, as 2004 was when the first big exodus happened.

  2. And sometimes by ArchieBunker · · Score: 1

    the curtains are just blue.

    --
    Only the State obtains its revenue by coercion. - Murray Rothbard
    1. Re:And sometimes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

      Can we limit the Game of Thrones stories to say, no more than one in the same two hour block?

      I know it's popular in many circles, but while the writing is okay, the political and economic themes are ignorant of how actual people function.

    2. Re:And sometimes by Shaitan · · Score: 1

      I think it is fair to say "it is popular" without any qualifier. Almost the entire work was written to parallel actual events and situations that played out historically by a professor of medieval history. Though it is worth mentioning that the books vary in subtle but significant ways and the the current and last season aren't based on the works of George R. R. Martin at all only, certain pieces of high level plot elements.

  3. What's a lost dragon called? by viperidaenz · · Score: 3, Interesting

    If dragons are nuclear weapons, does that make the white walker's dragon a broken arrow?

    1. Re:What's a lost dragon called? by hcs_$reboot · · Score: 1

      What? The WW have a dragon??

      --
      Slashdot, fix the reply notifications... You won't get away with it...
    2. Re: What's a lost dragon called? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nuclear waste takes on a whole New meaning

    3. Re:What's a lost dragon called? by Shaitan · · Score: 1

      I don't know, first they are Wyverns and second white dragons don't breath fire. The entire thing is preposterous.

    4. Re:What's a lost dragon called? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wyverns are just a kind of dragon. For those unfamiliar with medieval heraldry, a heraldic dragon has four legs plus wings, whereas a wyvern has two legs plus wings. They're both still forms of dragon,

    5. Re:What's a lost dragon called? by Leuf · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I really hate that White Walker dragon. Dragons are somewhat magical, but they are real physical animals. To breathe fire they must have some organ that produces flammable liquid/gas. Does the White Walker dragon eat in order to make this substance? It doesn't just appear out of nowhere. And why is it blue instead of red? Blue is a hotter flame than red. Nuclear explosions don't change colors just because the bad guy gets them.

      And the dragon doesn't need to breathe fire in order to be the most devastating weapon the Night King could ever have. Instead of moving at the shambling pace of his undead army, he can fly right around the armies of Westeros coming to fight him and make a new army wherever he goes. There's been a raging war all over the country so there's corpses everywhere, but any graveyard will do (including the one inside Winterfell). He can fly anywhere, drop off a White Walker and seed a new army that will grow larger than any force available to fight it before they can find out where it is and march there to fight. And he'll be off somewhere else doing the same thing again long before you find out where he was. Only another dragon can catch him, but the White Walkers are seemingly immune to fire (unlike the wights) so the living dragons can't hurt him but he can hurt them. Even if the living dragons can hurt him and his dragon, very risky going after him since you can't bring reinforcements with you but he can raise support wherever he goes.

    6. Re:What's a lost dragon called? by mrbester · · Score: 1

      They're both still forms of drake. While the words have a common root, they were disambiguated. European dragons have six limbs (Smaug, Y Ddraig Goch, the one St George clobbered, etc.). There's also a wyverex, which has no legs and two wings.

      --
      "Wait. Something's happening. It's opening up! My God, it's full of apricots!"
    7. Re:What's a lost dragon called? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If it was dragon they wouldn't have a separate name for it, or they'd call it a "dragon bipedal". You're an idiot.

    8. Re:What's a lost dragon called? by Shaitan · · Score: 3, Insightful

      https://roll20.net/compendium/dnd5e/Adult%20White%20Dragon

      White dragons have an ice/cold breath weapon, not blue fire. Using his breath weapon on the wall just would have thickened it not destroyed it.

    9. Re: What's a lost dragon called? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      It's *fantasy*. It's not *real*. Relax, take your meds, everything will be fine.

    10. Re:What's a lost dragon called? by Shaitan · · Score: 1

      A fact I'm sure George R. R. Martin, medieval historian would have schooled them on if he'd been involved.

    11. Re:What's a lost dragon called? by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      This is the standard flaw in all undead monsters. They live forever despite not eating to replenish energy lost due to action. You can say it's magic but it applies to zombies too, except in 28 Days Later they are immortal even if they don't eat and somehow even many years later have not rotted away.

      In any case, the dragons themselves must be magic because there is no way they could fly with the geometry they have, and they would need to consume so many calories they would be extremely difficult just to keep from starvation in any kind of captivity/pet scenario.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    12. Re: What's a lost dragon called? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It does not need to be completely dumb/illogical even when it is a fantasy.

    13. Re:What's a lost dragon called? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      GOT dragons are not like nuclear weapons. More like fighter planes with plenty of napalm. Useful in burning enemy armies and causing panic. And unlike nukes, you can jump in a pond to survive. A game changer in a world without gunpowder, sure. But nothing like nukes.

    14. Re: What's a lost dragon called? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It does have to be entertaining, and it works. Pedants like you are an insignificant minority that can and will be safely ignored. Get over it and if you can't just kill yourself.

    15. Re:What's a lost dragon called? by drinkypoo · · Score: 2

      Does the White Walker dragon eat in order to make this substance? It doesn't just appear out of nowhere. And why is it blue instead of red? Blue is a hotter flame than red.

      It's because the living dragons have a hydrogen flame, and the white walker dragon has a methane flame, obviously.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    16. Re:What's a lost dragon called? by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      the dragons themselves must be magic because there is no way they could fly with the geometry they have, and they would need to consume so many calories they would be extremely difficult just to keep from starvation in any kind of captivity/pet scenario.

      Didn't we see the "dragons eat rancher's cattle" trope in one episode of GoT? My memory is hazy, and I have not yet begun to binge.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    17. Re:What's a lost dragon called? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In any case, the dragons themselves must be magic because there is no way they could fly with the geometry they have, and they would need to consume so many calories they would be extremely difficult just to keep from starvation in any kind of captivity/pet scenario.

      In the books, the return of dragons coincides with magic becoming more powerful.

    18. Re:What's a lost dragon called? by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      Yes, and the farmer's kid too.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    19. Re:What's a lost dragon called? by Gilgaron · · Score: 1

      Obviously the bioluminescent organisms that make their eyes glow blue give off methane, which the dead dragon's ignition organ (perhaps an electric spark e.g. an eel) can still ignite, meanwhile ... ramble ramble reverse the tachyon flow...

    20. Re:What's a lost dragon called? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't know, first they are Wyverns and second white dragons don't breath fire. The entire thing is preposterous.

      What's preposterous is that we believe there is a specific form of a mythical creature.

      I mean, does one fictional imagining of something not real have more credibility than another fictional imagining of something which isn't real?

      You people are taking this shit way too seriously.

      I'm pretty sure the dragons in Harry Potter also didn't have front legs, are we going to say they're not dragons because we have a rigid definition based on nothing real?

    21. Re:What's a lost dragon called? by e_pluribus_funk · · Score: 1

      The 2nd law of thermodynamics is suspended in fantasy and space opera.

    22. Re:What's a lost dragon called? by demonlapin · · Score: 1

      Is this a joke? It's been a long time since the previous season aired, but that was pretty damned huge. If you're not a fan of the show, fine, but if you're watching it, I don't know how you'd miss this.

    23. Re:What's a lost dragon called? by Shaitan · · Score: 1

      "What's preposterous is that we believe there is a specific form of a mythical creature."

      No there is are specific words with definitions. Whether those words refer to mythical or otherwise fictional elements is beside the point. If we were to discover or create some sort of drake those words could apply to it and convey meaning.

      Words and their definitions are all fictional, they are not innate, we made them all up. Reptiles are reptiles because we invented a classification system, invented words and definitions to go with it, and classified creatures according to those definitions there is no reason we couldn't have sliced up nature along different lines. The definitions/words in some cases go quite far back in modern human history but humans still made them all up. We say things like "the definition was wrong" or otherwise "correct" categorizations and definitions to try to make them more useful or consistent not because they actually are innate wrong in some way... they can't be wrong, they mean whatever we say they mean.

  4. Also explores security issues by SuperKendall · · Score: 3, Interesting

    A major spoiler here if you've not watched the previous seasons, but taking your dragons deep into the heart of the undead kingdom was exceedingly stupid, basically like having a cavalier attitude to nuclear weapon security and handing over a Fat Man to a rogue nation.

    Now the undead have one and they are blazing a path south (though to give them credit, they are not unthinking monsters, they stoped along the way to hang some artwork). Without the dragon the wall guards could have just spent years dropping flaming pitch on the things.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    1. Re:Also explores security issues by rmdingler · · Score: 1

      I thought the same thing, and since it's statistically unlikely you and I are the only ones, the show's writers thought this, too. There has to be some large benefit to the expedition beyond the Wall that we can't see yet.

      --
      Happiness in intelligent people is the rarest thing I know.

      Ernest Hemingway

    2. Re:Also explores security issues by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nope, the narrative clearly established that the Wall was vulnerable and exposed, and the Others are quite clearly an existential threat do to the loss of the knowledge of the Sun Children.

    3. Re:Also explores security issues by voights · · Score: 1

      What? Maybe a failure of a mission is just that.

    4. Re:Also explores security issues by rmdingler · · Score: 1

      Perhaps, but it's much more story-worthy to imagine this mission bears some presently undecipherable bearing on the series' outcome.

      --
      Happiness in intelligent people is the rarest thing I know.

      Ernest Hemingway

    5. Re:Also explores security issues by hcs_$reboot · · Score: 1

      the undead have one and they are blazing a path south

      Was wondering, though, shouldn't these creatures fear the warmth in the South? Like polar bears fear global warming?

      --
      Slashdot, fix the reply notifications... You won't get away with it...
    6. Re:Also explores security issues by Shaitan · · Score: 1

      Are you kidding, in the time it took him to arm his spear and take down the dragon she could have just wiped out the night king if she'd gone on the direct offensive immediately. The whole thing would have been over.

      Of course that bit might have failed without her magically teleporting to their location north of the wall from the deep south in minutes.

    7. Re:Also explores security issues by phantomfive · · Score: 1

      A major spoiler here if you've not watched the previous seasons, but taking your dragons deep into the heart of the undead kingdom was exceedingly stupid, basically like having a cavalier attitude to nuclear weapon security and handing over a Fat Man to a rogue nation.

      That's what Russia almost did with Cuba, right?

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    8. Re:Also explores security issues by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Spoiler alert for those who haven't seen the show. The White Walkers cause winter wherever they go. In their world (at least as far as the TV series goes), the winters are of variable length and can last years, as do the summers. It appears that the White Walkers are responsible for this cycle in the first place, or at least heavily tied to it.

    9. Re:Also explores security issues by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dumb question here. I have never seen an episode of GoT, but does the Wall actually succeed in keeping out the caravans?

    10. Re: Also explores security issues by Nidi62 · · Score: 1

      Or, you know, in war sometimes you have to gamble and they dont always work out

      --
      The only thing necessary for evil to triumph is for it to be pitted against a slightly greater evil
    11. Re:Also explores security issues by stealth_finger · · Score: 1

      Dumb question here. I have never seen an episode of GoT, but does the Wall actually succeed in keeping out the caravans?

      No, but the landmined sections do very well.

      --
      Wanna buy a shirt?
      https://www.redbubble.com/people/stealthfinger/shop?asc=u
    12. Re:Also explores security issues by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      Dany made several tactical errors with her dragons, but she could be forgiven for them.

      Her basic mistake seems to have been to assume that people the ground couldn't do much about attack from the air. Clearly that's not the case. Arrows are common weapons, and it doesn't take much imagination to see the potential for a scaled-up version. But Dany is young and lacks experience of battle, and probably couldn't have predicted that the undead king would have a special magic spear either.

      The real blame lies with her advisers who should have warned her to be on the lookout for attack from the ground, and to deal with those threats first. Also why isn't dragon armour a thing?

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    13. Re:Also explores security issues by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Also why isn't dragon armour a thing?

      Weren't you just complaining about how dragons can't reasonably fly already? They surely can't carry enough armor to be useful against a ballista projectile.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    14. Re:Also explores security issues by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      Only in the sense that they can't fly by the normal laws of physics, only by magic. They clearly are magic, given that their "mother" became fire-proof (but not her clothes, natch).

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    15. Re:Also explores security issues by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A major spoiler here if you've not watched the previous seasons, but taking your dragons deep into the heart of the undead kingdom was exceedingly stupid, basically like having a cavalier attitude to nuclear weapon security and handing over a Fat Man to a rogue nation.

      Part of the adaptation failure of the show is it tends to figure out a result it wants, either due to its own wants or due to the event being part of the plot that GRRM has revealed to the writers, then hamfists its way to get that result.

      So, (book and sample chapters spoilers), Young Griff is set up with the Golden Company and potentially as a rightful Targaryen heir contender (pretender?) in the South.

      The show has the Queen looting the Reach, paying off its debts to the Iron Bank, then getting a new loan to hire the Golden Company. While Jon apparently is set up to be the Targaryen heir contender. This is despite Jon otherwise apparently considering the White Walkers to be the real threat, and being willing to sacrifice basically everything (including his crown) to fight the threat.

      It's hamfisted. For example, a better way would be to just write the Iron Bank plot-line out of it completely. Ignore the crown debts (which in the books may be how the North gets an army - in the books, Cersei does not pay off the Iron Bank, and instead the Iron Bank decides to back Stannis). The gold in the Reach can be used to refresh Cersei's forces directly, or we could hand wave away and use Iron Islanders as Cersei's army (which in the show is apparently a land that is populous and rich enough to quickly build an entire fleet, but I digress).

      The show writers apparently aren't brave enough to cut out plot lines to fit the time constraints of television. Which results in having to rush things that are important to the main story lines.

    16. Re:Also explores security issues by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Of cause her clothes weren't fireproof.
      If they were you wouldn't have seen T&A.
      Are you complaining you saw T&A?

  5. Dragon is China, and China is Dragon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The only race that identifies themselves as "Descendants of the Dragon" are the Chinese.

    And the Chinese do not like to be called "Nukes" !

    1. Re:Dragon is China, and China is Dragon by viperidaenz · · Score: 1

      They also like to censor Game of Thrones.

  6. I'm only here for the obligatory... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Boobs.

  7. No, that's Godzilla by Mr.+Dollar+Ton · · Score: 1

    GoT is just dumb slasher porn with no "deep meaning".

    1. Re:No, that's Godzilla by hcs_$reboot · · Score: 1

      So, what do you recommend? ER?

      --
      Slashdot, fix the reply notifications... You won't get away with it...
    2. Re:No, that's Godzilla by Brett+Buck · · Score: 0

      How about going outdoors, or interacting with your family or community?

    3. Re:No, that's Godzilla by hcs_$reboot · · Score: 1

      Going... outside?? with all these zombies??

      --
      Slashdot, fix the reply notifications... You won't get away with it...
    4. Re:No, that's Godzilla by Mr.+Dollar+Ton · · Score: 1

      Sex, sports, safari, planting trees, reading the Feynman lectures, whatever.

    5. Re: No, that's Godzilla by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Look, while I agree the Real World is not a friendly place for geeks, nerds and other assorted socially inept spazzes, we are not actively hostile to you either. If you behave as civilized beings we won't scream "look! A nerd!" and come at you to beat you up and brown-swirl you. We don't like to waste time on futile stuff. On the other hand if you keep behaving like noxious retards, we'll make damn sure you will never bothet sane people ever again.

    6. Re: No, that's Godzilla by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      we are not actively hostile to you either. If you behave as civilized beings we won't scream "look! A nerd!" and come at you to beat you up and brown-swirl you. We don't like to waste time on futile stuff.

      Riiight. That wasn't anywhere near true in high school and it can take years to get over the bullying and harassment. Of course that is assuming you didn't drive them to suicide, which in your mind they deserved it for "behaving like noxious retards".

  8. dragons are not dumb but can be stubborn at times by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 1

    dragons are not dumb but can be stubborn at times. Undead ones who really know what will happen and if they can be snapped out of it.

  9. Chinese Dragons are not REAL Dragons! by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 1

    Chinese Dragons are not REAL Dragons!

  10. This same tired tripe was tried on LOTR: by Hartree · · Score: 4, Insightful

    At one time someone tried to imply that Tolkien's books were about the Cold War and that the rings were nuclear weapons. Tolkien was having none of it and pointed out how the story would have to be different to mirror that.

    This is even more of a stretch.

    1. Re:This same tired tripe was tried on LOTR: by phantomfive · · Score: 1

      Don't expect a good ending to the series.

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    2. Re:This same tired tripe was tried on LOTR: by Leuf · · Score: 4, Insightful

      You understand this is directly from a quote from the author of the books that Game of Thrones is based on, right?

    3. Re:This same tired tripe was tried on LOTR: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      At one time someone tried to imply that Tolkien's books were about the Cold War and that the rings were nuclear weapons. Tolkien was having none of it and pointed out how the story would have to be different to mirror that.

      This is even more of a stretch.

      Really? The Cold War? Tolkien started writing about Middle-Earth during WWI, through WWII. One allegory for the ring is the bomb that ended WWII. The books seem to be filled with allegory, but I never figured the Cold War, too.

    4. Re: This same tired tripe was tried on LOTR: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The dragons aren't nukes, they're quite literally an Air Force.

    5. Re:This same tired tripe was tried on LOTR: by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 1

      They're filming the new LOTR TV series in Scotland, so nuclear rings are not ok.

      --
      -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
    6. Re:This same tired tripe was tried on LOTR: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Tolkien said his books were not an allegory, but could have applicability to several situations. Game of Thrones is similar.

      Also, heroine is rather subjective. I think there is a strong case that while Daenyrs might be a lighter shade of gray than some of the others, she is a villain.

  11. The United States right now? by AHuxley · · Score: 1

    Lots of nations had plans for nuclear weapons.
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...
    Some got very near to testing.

    --
    Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
    1. Re:The United States right now? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And at least one has the ability to nuke back and wipe out the most powerful one as last resort.

  12. Almost, but not quite. Dragons are Comets. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    a specialist in nuclear security analyzes Game of Thones, citing dragons "as living, fire-breathing metaphors for nuclear weapons."

    Dragons in Mythology are comets with long illuminated trails. Sometimes comets break up having multi-cores, and these are a hydra or a Serpent of the Sky famously one in the past had Seven Eyes. This is what much symbolism is all about. Like in the Renaissance secrets are still kept from the public and so occultists hide messages in art still today to bypass oppression. In Romeo and Juliet, Romeo is Rome, Juliet is the Comet that destroys Rome, hence the Great Tragedy. Re-watch that and take note of the celestial remarks made of Juliet by Romeo.

    Dragons fought off by Hercules or Egypt's Set, etc. represent a near end of civilization saved by herculean effort to recolonize. This is masonic wisdom 101. Death's Scythe is the shape of a Comet / Meteor / Falling star. Death or Father Time, (since civilization is cyclic), is often depicted with The Maiden and broken "Roman" columns. Melancholia is an art style about the fall of Rome due to a Dragon who destroyed the world.

    Checkout The Comet of 1811 - For a year this comet wrecked havoc with the world, causing geomagnetic disturbances all over the world, liquefying ground in South America, swallowing entire regimens of troops, causing thousands of earthquakes in New Madrid alone. The war of 1812 is basically a cover for this disaster, written out of history by the Hidden Hand (who's avatar was Napoleon at the time, nudge nudge wink wink).

    Sorry folks, Both Dragons and Nukes are just allegory for the comets that destroy the world... Hail Eris! Who throws her Golden Apple (comet) upon the Table of the Gods (this world), and throws the gods into chaos as they fight over it (cataclysm). "God is in His Heaven, All is Right With The World" Tthat "god" is a Dragon / Comet, folks, when he's not here all is OK, but when he appears, watch out!

    1. Re: Almost, but not quite. Dragons are Comets. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      a comet caused my local taco bell to be out of baja blast yesterday, fuck!

  13. Dumb by argStyopa · · Score: 1

    Quite possibly the dumbest thing I've seen on the internet in a while.

    Setting aside their naked effort to garner clicks by mentioning dragons, the analysis is puerile as well a backwards: rehashed sophomoric arguments from the cold war era, framed by a necessity to hew to the simile, rather than trying to glean useful insights through metaphor.

    Much of the article discusses the issues of uni polarism (ie GoTs situation) which hasn't been relevant since what, 1947? and never will be again.

    --
    -Styopa
  14. Bombers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    No, Dragons aren't Nuclear Weapons. Dragons are flying fortresses with napalm bombs. Nuclear weapons aren't merely raining fire from the sky. They nearly obliterate everything within a given radius and cast invisible radius over an even larger one. More importantly, ICBMs can rapidly launch multiple warheads at a speed that makes dragons (or planes) look like snails. Only in the sense that nuclear weapons are the "ultimate" weapon is there any sort of real comparison. Otherwise, it's a pretty horrible comparison.

  15. Oi vey. by Chas · · Score: 1

    Apparently these people have their noses so far up their own backsides that they don't think "Deterrence" is a goal in and of itself.

    They apparently think that guns/nukes are little Evil generators that are responsible for Everything Bad in human history. And if they'd never existed, the world would be this felicitous land of fairies and unicorns.

    NEWSFLASH!
    PEOPLE ARE ASSHOLES!
    This means that they're only as good as they NEED to be to keep the world from killing them outright.

    Could we be as effective in stopping antagonistic regimes from nuking anyone standing in their way if they didn't KNOW FOR A FACT that we possess the power to glass their little shithole countries multiple times over?

    In short, NO.

    So, while NOBODY like the fact that the world has this much concentrated megadeath just lying around, looking for an excuse.
    The fact that it exists serves as a warning to any tin pot dictator with delusions of grandeur.

    --


    Chas - The one, the only.
    THANK GOD!!!
  16. In my understanding, they are as frequent as well by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Dragons, including Godzilla, have attacked exactly as many times as nuclear weapons have. Do your research, you'll find the truth like I did. Those videos from the 40s were obviously models, which calls everything into question.

  17. More like an airplane by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Not really like a nuke, more like an airplane.

  18. TRANSLATION (IMHO)!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "The United States right now has the ability to destroy the world with our nuclear arsenal, but that doesn't mean we can achieve specific geopolitical goals. Power is more subtle than that. You can have the power to destroy, but it doesn't give you the power to reform, or improve, or build."

    TRANSLATION (IMHO):

    "Let's USA get rid of all its nuclear weapons, so that any other country that has nuclear weapons can easily destroy/subjugate USA!!!"

    OR:

    "Let's get rid of all nuclear weapons, so that USA & Russia & China & India (& all their allies) can make large scale direct wars w/ each other, just like good old days of WW1 & WW2!!! Come on people!!! WW 3 is long overdue!!! Can't you see it???"

  19. Bad analogy. by Harvey+Manfrenjenson · · Score: 1

    This is not just a bad analogy; it's a horrible, morally bankrupt analogy.

    There are two important things to consider about nuclear weapons: 1) They inevitably result in enormous collateral damage to noncombatants, including children; 2) they cause environmental damage that affects everyone on the planet, including the ones who used the nuclear weapons.

    I think there is a strong case to be made that nuclear weapons violate basic laws of war, in the same manner that biological weapons do. (Go ahead, fight me. You're unlikely to change my viewpoint on this).

    GOT's dragons do none of the above. They're big flying flamethrowers, and the show has established that they can be used in a relatively surgical manner.

  20. Yes by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    Yes in fact the wall kept out the wildlings, until they were invited to cross so they could help fight the undead.

    The undead would have been hanging out for a long time being burnt to a crisp from above, had they noted a dragon to melt a section of the wall.

    So yes, even after building a wall a tank can indeed get through it. But since not everyone has a tank it's still a good idea to build a wall to keep out the vastly greater numbers without tanks.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  21. Desperate reach... by bblb · · Score: 1

    Come on Slashdot... this is garbage, just a desperate reach to piggyback on the high trending GOT with some irrelevant garbage editorial.

  22. Elephants would be a wiser choice by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 1

    They're the M1 of that world.

    --
    -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
  23. More like when the Soviets got the Bomb by Koreantoast · · Score: 1

    Probably more akin to when the Soviets inevitably got themselves a nuclear weapon - suddenly, having dragons flying about doesn't seem as great of an idea anymore.

  24. Nope, stop lying by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It kept out the wildlings? You sure about that? We literally had an episode the season before specifically about an entire war party of wildlings crossing the fucking thing but go ahead and act like that never happened. Oh and then a fatman and his baby went right through the fucking thing while meeting another party of people doing the same fucking thing, but again, pretend like that didn't happen.

    You walls don't work no matter how racist you wanna be.