Slashdot Mirror


Google Fiber To Pay Nearly $4 Million To Louisville In Exit Deal (wdrb.com)

As Google Fiber prepares to leave Louisville, Kentucky, Google has agreed to pay the city government $3.84 million to fix damage to city streets. "The payments, to be made over 20 months, will cover removing fiber cables and sealant from roads, milling and paving streets 'where needed' and removing Google's above-ground infrastructure," reports WDRB, citing a news release from Mayor Greg Fischer's office. From the report: Google Fiber also agreed to donate $150,000 to the Community Foundation of Louisville to support Metro's "digital inclusion" efforts, which include "refurbishing used computers for low-income individuals and the enrollment of public housing residents in low-cost internet access through other companies providing service in Louisville," according to the mayor's office. Google Fiber, a unit of the Silicon Valley tech giant, said Feb. 7 that it would abandon the Louisville market after running into too many problems with the micro-trenching technique it used to install its fiber-optic cables as shallow as two inches below the pavement surface of city streets. Louisville, which lobbied for years to get Google Fiber, has the distinction of being the first city to lose the super-fast internet service. The report notes that Google Fiber only reached a small slice of the city, estimating that the service was only available to, at most, about 11,000 households.

74 comments

  1. $4 million over 20 months? Pshhh... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sergey or Larry probably carry around that much in pocket change.

  2. I wanted to believe. by Narcocide · · Score: 1

    But this just ruined it for me.

  3. Microduct by Spazmania · · Score: 4, Informative

    I've worked with microduct under slots cut in the street. Done properly, it works well.

    Two inches down? That's nuts. You have to pack sand on top of the duct so it stays in place and then seal the sand so it doesn't wash away. And the seal doesn't stay. You have to keep redoing it until the next time the road is paved.

    --
    Moderating "-1, Disagree" is simple censorship. Have the guts to post your opinion.
    1. Re:Microduct by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

      I was also wondering why just 2in down, that seems extremely shallow and that any kind of roadwork would mess up the cables.

      --
      "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    2. Re:Microduct by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      2 inches? In the Midwest? Where one regularly drives past (and into) potholes that are over 4 inches deep after each winter?

    3. Re:Microduct by HornWumpus · · Score: 2

      'As shallow as two inches below'.

      Given it's Kentucky, that would be two inches below the bottom of the pothole, or about three feet below the regular pavement surface.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    4. Re:Microduct by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 0

      I was also wondering why just 2in down, that seems extremely shallow and that any kind of roadwork would mess up the cables.

      The micro-trenching system was designed by Elizabeth Holmes - she assured everyone it would work flawlessly.

      --
      #DeleteChrome
    5. Re:Microduct by rahvin112 · · Score: 1

      Two inches isn't far enough down to mill and repave the roadway surface, you'd need to be 4-6 inches down to make that feasible. That's what's so stupid about what they did. They thought you could cut this slot two inches deep and drop a cable in it and it would stay there with different thermal expansion and everything.

      At least the proved the way not to do it.

    6. Re:Microduct by Knightman · · Score: 1

      I've seen it used successfully, but not as shallow as 2 inches.

      But I think what people are missing here is to question WHY Google had to go with the technique in the first place.

      --
      --- Reality doesn't care about your opinions, it happens anyway and if you are in the way you'll get squished.
    7. Re: Microduct by phantomfive · · Score: 1

      Why did they have to go with that technique? It doesn't make sense to me. With modern tools, digging a deeper hole isn't the hard part.

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    8. Re:Microduct by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They ran the fiber to my house in Austin, then they wouldn't terminate it. Years ago...it still sits on the side of my house. Bearstuff///

    9. Re: Microduct by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why did they have to go with that technique? It doesn't make sense to me. With modern tools, digging a deeper hole isn't the hard part.

      Modern like 3 point subsoiler Admittedly to run much cable, you'd have to modify it slightly and find a way to unroll it. Oh you have to add a tractor. I have a 1961 ford 641 tractor. That one will go around a foot deep, and if your just in dirt, it will do it pretty easy.

      Admittedly they might have to use something slightly more complex, but, well 2" is a joke.

    10. Re: Microduct by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      " but, well 2" is a joke "
      That's what she said.
      heh

    11. Re: Microduct by Knightman · · Score: 1

      Hint: For some reason they couldn't use existing infrastructure (like poles) to deploy their fiber...

      --
      --- Reality doesn't care about your opinions, it happens anyway and if you are in the way you'll get squished.
    12. Re: Microduct by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      where there is pavement you have to replace after digging a hole is expensive

    13. Re: Microduct by thepigwanker · · Score: 1

      From what I understand, Louisville spent $400k to fight AT&T so that Google could access the poles and then Google turned around and used this unproven 2" microtrenching technique. This problem appears to be entirely Google's manufacture, unless I'm mistaken.

    14. Re: Microduct by wyattstorch516 · · Score: 1

      Because it is cheaper to do it that way. Alphabet is getting tired of subsidizing this lemon of a company. I expect Google Fiber won't be around in 10 years.

  4. Why remove infrastructure? by SuperKendall · · Score: 2

    Couldn't the city just have taken over the cables at least? Why do they have to be removed?

    I can see repairing the damage but it seems excessive to go back and remove everything installed.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    1. Re:Why remove infrastructure? by omnichad · · Score: 2

      Why keep it? It's just a huge headache that won't last through another winter or survive resurfacing. And it only covers a portion of the city.

    2. Re:Why remove infrastructure? by Richard_at_work · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Well, the problem is that the installation method isn't successful - its a time and money sink that Google wants nothing more to do with, so to leave it in place either means abandoning it in place (which has its own ongoing maintenance problems anyway, to ensure the pavement or roadway is safe) or someone else taking on the time and money sink in maintenance...

      Thats why its being removed - its a costly failure and if left in place its an ongoing costly failure.

    3. Re:Why remove infrastructure? by LostMyAccount · · Score: 1

      I wonder if any cities were ever clever enough to require that Google fiber installations be both durable enough to last 20 years without major physical installation maintenance and a salable asset should Google decide they no longer want to run the project.

      My guess is no, they all saw this project as a massive savior and that Google would build it to last forever, because Google and Internet.

  5. look like it will cost more by renegade600 · · Score: 1

    look like google got off easy. most likely it is going to cost more to fix the problems google caused. it is not cheap to fix city streets. wonder how much it cost google with off the record payments to get off so easy.

    1. Re:look like it will cost more by rahvin112 · · Score: 2

      Cost will depend on street type and paving life cycle.

      On low traffic streets they can go back and pull the cable out and fill the slot with an elastomeric tar. This will work reasonably well until it's time to mill and fill the surface as part of their pavement maintenance as long as they keep re-sealing it every year it should be fine. Given the local climate they probably don't crack seal yearly like the northern states with freeze thaw cycles so this will likely cost the city more than it would elsewhere where annual crack sealing is common. But even 2 inch wide cracks can be sealed, and the linear cut will make it easier once the cable is gone (the cable would expand/contract at different rates than the surrounding asphalt and sealant).

    2. Re:look like it will cost more by dgatwood · · Score: 1

      Given the local climate they probably don't crack seal yearly like the northern states with freeze thaw cycles so this will likely cost the city more than it would elsewhere where annual crack sealing is common.

      I doubt a year goes by in which Louisville doesn't experience at least two or three freezes. Mind you, it isn't a deep freeze, but it doesn't have to freeze below the ground's surface to cause damage to roads that are sitting on top of the surface. All it takes is water getting into the cracks. :-)

      --

      Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

  6. Big fire.... /. no care! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Loser News Site..... Nothing matters here.

  7. ROTFLMAO by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Total incompetence by Google, and worse by the politicians for letting them get away with it.

    USA, leader of the free world....and you can't even get fibre done properly.

    1. Re:ROTFLMAO by Narcocide · · Score: 1

      Yea, too bad there wasn't some sort of search engine they could have used to research the pitfalls of other cold-climate construction projects ahead of time...

    2. Re:ROTFLMAO by olsmeister · · Score: 1

      too bad they didn't just stay in their lane, bro...

    3. Re: ROTFLMAO by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Google Fiber has been successful elsewhere, so as much as this sounds like a failure it is still just one data point.

      And undoubtedly affordable Google Gigabit Fiber has forced competitors to offer faster service at lower prices. Before Google Fiber all you ever heard from the entrenched providers was that speeds were good enough. Now you have 50 times faster speeds for the same prices in some markets. That was competition.

    4. Re: ROTFLMAO by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you are acting like this is the ONLY failure. they have also done the cluster fuck of hanging cable from existing poles, they have outage rates higher than most of the industry and they have been cancelling the rollout in many places. All up the entire thing has been a complete clusterfuck.

    5. Re:ROTFLMAO by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ISWYDT
      Take my mod point.

    6. Re:ROTFLMAO by wyattstorch516 · · Score: 1
  8. Dual Purpose by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    2 inches? In the Midwest? Where one regularly drives past (and into) potholes that are over 4 inches deep after each winter?

    Maybe the thought was if the cables were just 2in down, they would actually serve to reinforce the road. :-)

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  9. Re:YOU'RE A MORONIC LYING FAGGOT KENDALL GET A JOB by HornWumpus · · Score: 0, Troll

    Cancer is coming for you.

    From the rent free tenant in your head. Your insanity will backfire. Count on it.

    --
    John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
  10. Four meeellion dollars by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I can just see Dr. Evil slavering over the prospect of four <<>> dollars.
    Don't spend it all in one place.

  11. Raleigh should too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I wish Raleigh could get the same deal. Bastards tore up yards all over the city, but all we got was empty (and often poorly buried) conduits. They only sell access to businesses or apartment buildings it seems.

    They dug holes all around an entrance to a greenway park, and left it like that for nearly a year. Rendered that end of the park unusable by the residents. City of Raleigh didn't lift a finger. I suspect they might have if they had known how Google was going to renege on their agreement to supply said residents with fiber.

    Google is just another untrustworthy corp. Yet another reason to use DuckDuckGo.

    1. Re: Raleigh should too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      DuckDuckGo is a well known USIC honeypot.

    2. Re: Raleigh should too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Shutup Sergey; nobody asked you.

  12. Google's not the only one by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My town has had Comcast for years. Around Y2K Verizon started wiring fiber, and RCN, who was expanding into all the neighboring towns, signed a deal with the town.
    Then the 2000/2001 Dot Bomb hit. Verizon, to their minor credit, finished the job. RCN, who hadn't started anything, walked away from the deal.
    I guess there wasn't a non-performance penalty, and nobody in town management gave a rat's ass, so, their reaction was "meh, let them walk away".
    In the mean time though the town, which owns all the poles (because town owned electric company) said, "hey Verizon, you pay for telephone ines on the poles, but doesn't include the fiber too. Come talk to us about how much you're going to pay for that."
    In the mean time, even with two cable providers, prices are the same as everywhere else. No competition driving prices down here.

    1. Re:Google's not the only one by Dunbal · · Score: 1

      Competition only drives prices down in economics classrooms. In the real world you get a cartel and price fixing.

      --
      Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
    2. Re:Google's not the only one by Firethorn · · Score: 1

      There's plenty of examples of competition driving both prices down and service up in the real world, though yes, cartels and price fixings are indeed at least occasional problems. That's what a moderate amount of regulation, and some serious work on preventing regulatory capture(where regulations are used to prevent competition, not encourage it) comes in.

      --
      I don't read AC A human right
  13. you have to be kidding by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Google pulling the fiber out can not be re-used. IOW, there is absolutely zero value to Louisville or Google in pulling that out. This could only be some local gov. idiots trying to punish Google. Sad.

  14. Google fogey and Granny Smith Apples by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The new normal is Google is an old fogey and Apple is Granny Smith Apple.

    Apple is moving past iTunes, pay per song download towards streaming, retiring iTunes, will *speculate* stop supporting older hardware and turn off services

    Google is cleaning out the old dirty shirts unused for months from the bottom of the closet and putting them in the retirement bin.

    Both companies are well into or past middle age and struggling to have a new product produce meaningful new revenue beyond 5% of total revenue.

    Expect flights of fancy to be shut down or currently free services, Youtube, Google Maps and Apple maps to become paid via either a content surcharge on your cell phone bill or some other sort of monthly micro-cost.

    Generationaly, how many Google or Apple managers have overseen a hugely successful new product in terms of total top line company revenue since 2014?

    Headwinds are against both companies making significant revenue for new products as a percent of total revenue since total revenue is so large.

    Combine with Amazon Bezos announcing a slowing growth rate and the FANG stocks are going to be much slower moving.

    Google's last big consumer push was 2010~2012 with Google+, Google Voice, Android v4, ...
    Apple's last big consumer push leading to revenue streams of size was iTunes 2005, iPhone/iPad 2009 and iphone China in ~2015

    A new smart speaker selling 2 million at Christmas is so tiny as to not matter.

    Self driving cars - far far away from the 5% threshold needed for mass mass market
    Hybrid or all Electric cars - Same - far far away
    Home automation gadgets - Niche with millions in revenue but not much impact in top line of a billion dollar company

    One can look at the recent acquisitions to see which ones 3 years out have actually led to significant revenue for the company acquiring it.

    When the professional managers and accountants take over....."shave a few cents off this number and profits go up by 5 million"
    versus persons in charge actually being able to develop new products

    1. Re: Google fogey and Granny Smith Apples by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Under rated post.

  15. Wow.... crazy! by King_TJ · · Score: 1

    I just got cited by an electrical inspector because a circuit that runs through buried PVC doesn't have its PVC buried deep enough between my house and my detached garage. It's probably 8" or so below the ground, with a concrete sidewalk running over the top of it. But the code states it must be buried a full 18".

    So Google thought fiber was ok to just shove 2 inches below the roadway?!

    I sometimes wonder if the Google Fiber project was MEANT to fail - so Google could experiment with a bunch of stuff related to deploying it and then pull out again?

    1. Re:Wow.... crazy! by supremebob · · Score: 1

      I think that the common consensus was that Google Fiber was a tactic to scare the telcos and cable companies to improve their broadband speeds in major metropolitan areas.

      It kinda worked, too, as the upgraded network speeds help other Google products like YouTube and Google Drive work much better than they did earlier. Sure, people in rural areas are still stuck with slow and unreliable Internet access, but let's face it... Google Fiber was never going to get deployed there anyway even if they were taking this project seriously.

    2. Re:Wow.... crazy! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Strange, I had to bury my 12/3 Romex 4 feet deep in Michigan.

    3. Re:Wow.... crazy! by jimbolauski · · Score: 1

      If you accidentally nick a fiber cable there is no danger to anyone the same can not be said for electricity, if anyone goes to replace your sidewalk there is a good possibility that the power line will get nicked.

      --
      Knowledge = Power
      P= W/t
      t=Money
      Money = Work/Knowledge so the less you know the more you make
    4. Re:Wow.... crazy! by samwichse · · Score: 1

      The code is usually based on the frost line so that heaving won't occur.

      https://diy.stackexchange.com/...

  16. goofs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How fucking hard can it be to dig a trench for a tube. Losers.

  17. Wait What? by WindowsStar · · Score: 1

    The company that makes trillions of dollars is only paying 4 million. They need to pay for everything the inconvenience the promises made. They need to pay 100 million to make it right. Plus the city should keep the infrastructure and build upon it.

    1. Re:Wait What? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nope. They can afford to lawyer up and pay the bare minimum. Welcome to the real world where the rich can do what they want.

  18. Shut up, APK by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Don't you have anything better to do in your $1 house than constantly post this spam? Are you really that desperate for attention that you feel the need to constantly stalk and harass SuperKendall, raymorris, and ShanghaiBill? The answer appears to be yes, though your efforts would be better spent completing a MacOS version of your toy string sorting program.

    Your spam and harassment is unwelcome, Alexander. You've harassed many other users, too, including Subie, Ol Olsoc, webmistressrachel, c6gunner, Zontar The Mindless, amicusNYCL, Coren22, and so many others. Isn't it time you stop being such a bitter crybaby and do something useful with your life? Although your string sorting program (APK Hosts File Engine) is complete shit, working on it would still be better than crapflooding Slashdot.

    Grow up, APK. You're 54 years old. Act your damn age.

  19. An ad company by AHuxley · · Score: 1

    is not the ISP you're looking for.

    --
    Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
  20. Re: TRAITOR KENDALL WILL HANG FROM HIS INCEL GLAND by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Paid forum disruption shitposter trolls sure do have weird sexual fantasies.

  21. Re:$4 million over 20 months? Pshhh... by parkinglot777 · · Score: 0

    No surprised. ACs never read anything, not even the summary.

    The payment isn't going to be a pay out as cash. From the summary, it is the total amount that they are going to spend over 20 months.

    cover removing fiber cables and sealant from roads, milling and paving streets 'where needed' and removing Google's above-ground infrastructure,

    refurbishing used computers for low-income individuals and the enrollment of public housing residents in low-cost internet access through other companies providing service in Louisville

  22. Re:$4 million over 20 months? Pshhh... by magarity · · Score: 2

    cover removing fiber cables and sealant from roads

    Can anyone figure out why the city would want them to remove the cables and sealant? Some other outfit could come along and make use the already laid cable, no?

  23. Re:$4 million over 20 months? Pshhh... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  24. Not the benevolent company people think they are by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Google was never in this to bring the people of Louisville faster internet. This was all about them trying a half-baked idea that they probably had reservations to try in a bigger city. Google abused the trust that the city of Louisville invested in them by leaving their garbage cable in the ground and only moved to do this after the local government started to squawk. Shame on them!

    The citizens of Louisville got their hopes up just to be dashed. And now they are left with Spectrum Cable gloating about Google's loss on the radio and behaving as if they are the city's saviors.

  25. Hey asshole trying to FRAME me... apk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hey asshole trying to FRAME me, tell you what: ANYTIME you want to accuse me of the bs lies you're spouting, meet me face to face & do it - I will fucking END you motherfucker...

    * I SHIT YOU NOT!

    (You PUSSCAKE PUNK hiding behind UNIDENTIFIABLE anonymous posts weezil)

    APK

    P.S.=> I will FRACTURE YOUR SKULL cocksucker - guaranteed... apk

  26. Re:$4 million over 20 months? Pshhh... by arglebargle_xiv · · Score: 1

    Can anyone figure out why the city would want them to remove the cables and sealant?

    Because microtrenching doesn't work, it's only slightly more effective than using chewing gum to tack the fibre onto walls of buildings. So Google has ended up damaging roads and sidewalks, and now needs to undo the damage.

    Just to put this into perspective, the regs for fibre here are buried at least 550mm deep in protective 20mm thick-walled conduit. If you suggested a microtrench you'd get laughed at. Literally laughed at, they'd think you were making a joke.