Slashdot Mirror
Linux Trademark Under Attack Again
Rares Marian sent us linkage to an article running over at LinuxToday. Apparently someone else has tried to trademark Linux. This time its in Korea. Now there is no way that this can hold up,
so I find this amusing, but it does actually have to be addressed. Very frusterating. It bothers me that there are so many people who are willing to pull this sort of stuff.
Didn't we just see this story?
I don't see much reason to kvetch about idiots trying to grab trademarks they have no prayer of keeping. A single credible example of Linux being used prior to the registration date is sufficient to torpedo the proposed trademark. If the guy wants to support the Korean government by paying a non-returnable trademark registration fee, I think that's admirable. ;-).
Rogers Cadenhead (Web: http://www.cadenhead.org/workbench)
It's kind of refreshing to see that such ballsy idiocy isn't limited only to these grand ole United States, you know...
If only I'd patented the concept of attempting to trademark Linux, I could have sued him.
So, they _didn't_ know that Linux was an existing operating system? hmmm.. slow news, i suppose. Then again, maybe not.
But what I'm wondering is, did they think they invented Linux themselves? Who are they kidding? (or what were they trying to trademark Linux as, if not for/as the OS?)
Insert mind here.
Formed to protect intellecutal property. Now used to give ulcers to the true intellecutal property owners. I think it's time we got rid of trademarks and patents.
--
Injured software engineer fights back against Mattel!
That was the funniest thing I'd read this week.
Note: There isn't even a HOWTO for setting up Linux for Korean folk. The Portuguese would have a much better chance at this claim...
Just pick up two copies of OS/2.
iSKUNK!
Heh, I just got this strange idea that M$ was the one responsible just to screw with the Linux community.
Idea.......Linus should just get the trademark for Linux, and then allow everyone to use it. that would keep all these morons from trying to profit on it. Is this workable though? (i dont know how trademarks really work)
-sloth
Actually it's already been done. Linus owns the trademark on linux. Originally he didn't register it because he didn't like the idea of anyone owning it. The some shmuck registered it and sent letters to a bunch of american book publishing companies and redhat and the likes saying he wanted their money. After a brief legal fight the trademark was transfered to Linus and everyone lived happily ever after. The end.
-matt
Here's a link to the e-mail record of the defense of the Linux® trademark in the US.
lake effect weblog
{Network engineer in Chicago--looking for work!}
I do believe, at least according to the article at linux today itself, that the article on slashdot is incorrect, or at least not comprehensive. Yongtae Kwon did in fact succesfully register a trademark for the word linux in Korea. He did probably try as the slashdot article says, but it neglects to say that he succeeded. And there is a way that this thing can hold up and that is, at least according to the patent office in Korea, if the existence of linux in Korea in 1995 cannot be proved. Correct me if i'm wrong, because thats what i am doing to you.
--Isaac
Time for a big ole' rant, I think. This is pretty much the same sort of thing I've been expecting for over a year now, and it's finally happening on a big scale.
Is this whole trademark thing a dirty and stupid trick? Heck yeah... but it's just a sign of the trends that are occurring right now. Don't react with surprise or anything because someone is trying to get down, dirty, and commercial with Linux. The OSS fanatics have been talking world domination for years. Well, it's starting to happen. But the whole OSS happy let's-all-share attitude ain't gonna be adopted by the vultures just because this is the Open Source world... they're going try and make money off everything they can, including stupid trademarks if they can get them, no matter what you say.
Sure, there will be rants. There will be features posted on Slashdot and other places and huge cries of outrage because someone is muddying the waters and diluting the movement with the evil force known as capitalism. Well, tough... the perpetrators of that evil force aren't going to listen, because they don't care what the purists think. They care about the opinions of the people who *buy* the stuff... and for the most part, *those* people don't care what the purists think either.
It's been happening the whole time. The commercialization of various OSS programs/companies. IPO's of Linux distributors, meaning they now have to worry more about what shareholders think than the people who *make* the OS. Stupid, inaccurate stories on C-Net, and so on. Linux is hot, there's a potload of money to be made, and it's all going blatantly commercial under everyone's noses. In a few years people will wake up and realize that Linux is now just as messed up as Windows - at least in the political sense, if not others; the one-OS-many-distributors model might not hold up so well in that world. This is not to say that money can't be made with OSS, or Linux can't work in the real world, etc, etc. That's a completely different argument. But if there's money to be made (and there is) then the whole scene is going to change radically in the process, whether for the good or for the bad.
Sorry for the doomsday scenario, but this is as good a time as any to say it, I guess. I doubt there's too much anyone can do about the Corporatization of Linux - the whole OSS model sort of facilitates it, in a way. But just don't act surprised when stuff like this happens.
Slarty
Hi... I'm Larry... the shivering chipmunk... brrrrr!... I'm cold... I need a sweater...
the guy is going to lose, at least that's what the article says.
by the way, do monkey and dog really taste just like chicken? or is that only in "The Matrix"?
By trademarking this in country X, he is probably trying to sue companies using the trademark in the country X and get rich... Just some greedy guy behind that. What he hasn't realised though is that it would never hold in court unless he has some product with a name that can be trademarked.
On a trip there in January of 1998, I noticed that there is something else called "Unix" in Korea. I even have a picture somewhere (not online) of a sign for an electronics store in the Russian district of Pusan, advertising that they have "Unix" products. One of these products appears to be a vacuum cleaner. I do not know if this line of vacuum cleaners is superior to the "VAX" line of vacuum cleaners, whose manufacturer unsuccessfully tried to sue Digital for copyright infringement in the mid-1980s.
Unix Electronics Co., an exporter of massager chairs and electronic massagers to Europe, signed a contract to export $5 million worth of ion hair dryers annually to Creative Company of Japan, a specialist in beauty parlor and barbershop products. Unix is diversifying its export markets and plans to attend the Consumer Electronic and Chicago Shows. Source: http://www.kita.or.kr/ktp/li98-42.html
Perhaps the Koreans thought the OS was really called Rinux.
Okay, some of these moderators should RTFMG (RTF Moderator Guidelines). The above post was _NOT_ "Offtopic".
--------
"I already have all the latest software."
If the point of a business is to make profits, then creating artificial scarcity is an obvious tactic. This can be seen in arenas such as the consumers diamond market which is actually over-supplied for the average wedding ring wannabe (just try reselling it to get an idea of its real value). Gaining sole ownership of a trademark is part of that strategy of limiting consumer choices as the brand (and associated perceived quality) will create a distinction with competitors.
:-) ), but to painstakingly dole out limited (and thus scarce and controllable) rights of use to maximise revenue streams. It's not the software but the control that companies are seeking.
One of the fundamental driving forces behind OpenSource which ESR didn't mention in his Magic Cauldron paper is the transition of software from a scarce item (requiring teams of highly trained mainframe programmers) to a commodity form (scripts/visual languages, etc). Prices are then determined by gross supply and demand which, with limitless digital replication, leads to infinite supply and thus theoretically zero price. In this market awash with junk mixed with gems, the problem is to stand out, hence it is easier to use software as a loss-leader for other non-portable services (e.g. AOL) than it is selling it as a distinct manufactured product. There are some software categories which do lead themselves to natural scarcity (e.g. highly specialised physics problems) but the economic payoff is so diffuse that there is no financial incentive to accelerate the time to market (but then science always thinks long-term as well as shoe-string).
In the long-term, trademarks are going to be a problem as it is so easy to create new ones. Hence the interest of big firms to buy up fast growing competitors and absorb their "name" before the wider public gains permanent "mindshare" and dilutes their purchasing draw (notice how one not-so-well-loved company brands every single product under their name?). While the "technical merits" of a piece of software may be obvious to the digital cognosti (ie. engineering geeks with too much time on their hands), the average public is not exposed to a wide range of implementations and therefore has no comparative point of reference to make an informed choice (plus the good-enough motive applies here). Trademarks is just one weapon in creating non-obvious barriers to pure competition which in a capitalistic society equates to near zero profits (anathema to a growing share price). Hence the desire of corporations not to sell software (perish the thought of the unwashed masses getting their hands on their pristine intellectual property
OpenSource software developers have to understand the corporate mindset no matter how non-intuitive it appears because it has to coexist with the wider business ecosystem. No matter how desirable, free beer just does not magically appear.
LL
Do they eat wood with chopsticks?
(I just got to play with moderator access for the first time, and I'm not sure if that will prevent me from posting this... I hope I don't type all this out for nothing.)
I haven't been following the whole Linux trademark scene too closely, but my understanding of it is that everyone is terrified that someone will successfully trademark it, and then prevent all those open source products from using it. (Thus pretty well destroying Linux.)
Well, it seems to me there's a perfect long-term solution: Why doesn't somebody in Washington amend IP law to allow someone to register an anti-trademark, or an anti-copyright, or an anti-patent?
To register an "anti-trademark", you'd have to prove your claim to the mark just the same as you would for a normal trademark. However, instead of granting you exclusive rights to the mark, an "anti-trademark" would ensuring that the mark remains in public domain, with the force of U.S. law guaranteeing that no individual could ever claim it.
The concept could be extended to copyrights and patents... Essentially, you'd end up with a standardized, easily enforceable BSD-style license. (Of course, it wouldn't be compatible with the GPL, which ironically relies heavily on traditional copyrights.)
This is just a pipe dream... It would take years to be made into law, and I have no idea what you'd have to go through to get it recognized internationally. But could it work?
MSK
Oh, come on. Rob Malda's, um, "linguistic inconsistencies" are part of his folksy charm. Think of his unique approach to the English language as a feature, not a bug. Sure, I could clean up Rob's spelling and grammatical errors, and then I could go through all my old blues, country, and rock 'n roll albums and publish the "corrected" lyrics. Do you really want me to do this?
;-)
/. comment I've seen -- including yours -- that criticizes Rob Malda's writing contains at least one glaring grammatical or spelling error. "Let he who is without sin cast the first stone..."
I'd rather leave Rob Malda (and Muddy Waters) alone, and I'm the Official Boss Editor for all of Andover's Linux-related sites and you're not, so deal with it. bucko.
- Robin "roblimo" Miller
PS - Every single
You are confused -> A trademark and a copyright differ.
You are deluded -> If you think that the USA would let the WTO screw around with somthing like the Linux trademark.
-- The act of censorship is always worse than whatever is being censored. Always.
When the revolution comes I'll be the guy with the assault rifle aiming for ties!
ObMotto: I'll have 'patent this!' written on my helmet.
It's race prejudice. Stop racism !
there is already a group that trademarked "OS 9".. i think they're called microware or something.. as a result, it looked like they were gonna sue apple, since apple was going to name the next version of the Mac OS "Mac OS 9".. ..this is despite the fact that it probably wouldn't hold up in court, and apple chose the name "mac os 9" not because they wanted to impersonate the makers of OS 9, but because they released it after mac os 8.. so while i doubt you could get away with "OS", you could maybe try "OS 11" and get apple on that one.. or "version 5' and sue netscape when Mozilla goes final.. oh, wait.. even better. copyright "kernel 2.4" and then when "linux kernel 2.4" comes out you can sue Linus. microsoft doesn't have this problem since, of course, God knows why, they name their OSes after years.
America was built on racism you pinko commie bastard!
Liten up dude... If youve a serious complaent - take it up with the editers. Its raelly getting old lisening to you English majers with notin bettor to do than show everone how much you can whine about the okasionel grametical eror. Wining on de forum is just childesh... If you're joking - ha ha ha. Ha, ha ha, ha and a little more... (wiping tears from my eyes and holding my sides)
Mike (not anonymous - just too stupid to register...)
I won't dignify the imature and uneducated 15 year old racist rants, but on the above quote, it's them damned Americans who where there first! Who is the ONLY country to use nuclear force (mass destruction personified) against another nation? Who mastered the development of many of the biological agents Iraq now wants to use? Who produces more weapons of mass destruction than any other nation on earth (combined)? It's them shit-eating bleached worms in America. Who continues to fund revolutionaries? Who created Sadam in the first place? Who created Noriega? Can you say American JackAsses? Those "insignificant" Koreans don't hold a candle to the American Plague when it comes to cruelty, death, destruction and subterfuge...
-- No nation or race is innocent of atrocities - so don't go criticizing the Koreans until you get that damned forest out of your eye, asshole!
Written by a White Worm American JackAss with complete disgust at what humans do to each other in the name of nationality, race or god...
Burn a flag - keep a family warm...
BTW - "...can't even pronounce Linux" - ever tried talking Korean lately? They'd say you can't pronounce "hello" and "gotta shit" right. And the next time you order a crab dinner - realize that you are eating a submarine insect! And clams are related to your garden variety snail! What a dumb-ass...go to your KKK-buttsucker meeting and leave the rest of us alone.
I beleive that the WTO might jsut find in favor of a native of Finland over USA, eh?
Actually, the reason why mature dog is tough and stringy is not because of the eating of other animals (snake is pretty good), but because it is old. Older animals have old muscles, meaning that the muscle fibers aren't growing, and aren't as flexible as those of a younger animal. Since when you're eating meat, you're eating muscle, tougher, less flexible muscles translates to tougher, stringier meat. This is why lamb (young sheep) tastes so much different than mutton (old sheep), why we eat pullets (young chickens) and not old chickens, and why veal (young cow) tastes SO good...
Incidentally, another factor that affects how meat tastes is Testosterone. Testosterone gives a funny (bad) taste to meat, as well as affecting the texture by making it tougher and stringier. This is male meat animals, like sheep, pigs, and cows, are castrated at an early age.
HACK THE MIRC BOT!!! YO!
Anonymous Cowards are people too.
Ugh! This is kind of a low grade urban myth. Native Japanese speakers don't "mix up" the letters "l" and "r". The letter "r" in Japanese is articulated with the tip of the tongue touching the upper palate, so it has a kind of "d"-ish or "l"-ish tinge. There is no letter "l" per se in Japanese. And as you might have guessed, there are a couple of sounds in Japanese that native English speakers invariable mangle.
Does anybody know what a weapon of mass "distruction" is? Perhaps it kills you and distributes software at the same time?
Adio shoes makes a shoe called the UNIX. I want to buy a pair, they look super dope, and of course I could impress all the geeks I know, "yeah, I have unix shoes." heres a link to the shoe
OH? And here I was, thinking the topic was about Korean trademarks... silly me :)
What say we through a nice boot party for people who apply for really stupid trademarks and patents? :)
In my opinion the Linux trademark must be protected. The catch with trademarks is that if you don't protect them you will end up loosing them. And we wouldn't want that would we?
Imagine what it would be like if just anyone could sell you an operating system and call it "Linux".
I think that there should be extremely hard requirements for what you should be allowed to call linux. For example:some filesystems must be supported on every linux distrubution. And no filesystem should be favored in terms of userfriendlyness.
A good way of protecting the linux os from fragmentation i think.
There is no Korea. There is only South Korea and North Korea.
A big part of why males are castrated (at least with hogs and cattle, sheep aren't raised in quantity for anything but wool production in the US) is to make it safer and easier to deal with them before butchering time. Bulls and boar hogs tend to be aggressive, and either one can kill someone fairly easily. ps modern US commercial beef tends to be high in fat because in the late 19th/early 20th century, the primary product of the cattle industry was hides and fat. Meat was a by-product.
I know I am late, but...
OS/9 has been around a lot longer than that - I remember you could get it for the Radio Shack Color Computer 2 back in 1986 - a real, multi-tasking, multi-user OS for an 8-bit CPU (6809)!
Reason is the Path to God - Anon
From what I could see, this person (along with others) trademarked more than Linux... OpenLinux, Linux2000, TurboLinux. Gee those first 3 sound like names OTHERS have made before. And what about Linux Security. Who's he trying to fool. He knew of it.
In the German culture, isn't it a faux pas to correct someone's grammar/pronunciation? (moreso than US/Australia)
Actually, pigs of either sex can be aggressive. Sometimes a pig will get mean, and you really have to be careful around it.
But the fact remains that testosterone gives a bad taste to meat, which is why they are castrated.
Oh, and about the fat content in beef... That is... bull . It is in the best interest of a meat producer to have more muscle, since muscle is denser than fat, and you can put more weight on an animal. On the other hand, you want fat in the meat because it makes the meat taste better.