Slashdot Mirror


HERF Gun: Make it in your basement

CuriousGeorge113 was the first one to write us about the homemade HERF gun an engineer unveiled at Infowarcon '99. All stuff that you can buy from a hardware store, and disable computers at varying range, depending on size. The current model does not do permanent damage, unlike EMP.

13 of 196 comments (clear)

  1. I think... by Paul_Taylor · · Score: 3

    I think they forgot to mention that when the computers locked up, they were running windows. Having a HERF gun near it was entirely a coincidence.

  2. ... technology dating back to Tesla ... by Pegasus · · Score: 4

    Finnaly someone showed this to the public. It really is an old idea, but in the world we live now, it has some interesting effects.
    I was tracing the development of such toys based on Nikola Tesla's ideas for a while now and found a lot of impresive stuff. Just do a quick search on "telsa weapon" and read some of the articles that pop up. One of the most scary is located at http://www.peg.apc.org/~nexus/bskies1[2345].html (yeah thats five parts of it). Hints about causing earthquakes with similiar technology as described in the story above. Other interesting sites are Gravity gate (http://www.starwon.com.au/~rayd/index.htm), Kelly BBS (www.kellynet.com), Tesla web ring and similiar. If you like to search a lot, you may even find hints about top secret super high tech weapons developed in Russia for knocking out satelites, which are also based on one of the Tesla's ideas and are powered by also originaly Tesla's work, improved by dr. H. Moray, the so called Moray generator. Basicaly you just set up an antenna and some electronic wizardry and you have electricity. Sounds too good to be true, but there's a story on the kellynet about how Tesla made an electric car powered by such a device.
    Back to the EMP stuff...does anyone have some nice information about project HAARP and similiar "experiments" all around the world? I heard somewhere that US military already developed their small EMP "bomb" for knocking out "e-criminals". I would like to take a look at one of those toys :) And the next thing would be to cover my house entirely in somekind of conductive mesh, to make more or less effective faradey cage. I feel like protecting computers and other electronic equipment will be big bussiness in the next decades.

  3. Buy it here - Re:Mobile Phone Killer by Markee · · Score: 3
    There already is a mobile phone killer. It's about the size of a cell phone, although wall mounted. The company that makes them didn't plan on making them portable in 1998. What a shame! I'd love to carry one of those around and enjoy the silly faces of all the yuppies who annoy anyone in the vicinity by shouting into their phones all the time.

    You could even make the device look like a cell phone itself, so that everybody around you (on the train, for example) will think their cell phone is broken, while you, for a change, bore them out of their skulls talking into your little gadget.

    Here's the story on Electronic Telegraph: Immobilising the mobiles

    --
    Yes, you are right there. -- Another glass of champagne?
  4. hmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3

    Alright, a few points to clear some things up. Most of you won't realize this from the article, but these HERF guns are very low range. The gun has to be within a very minimal amount of feet to accomplish anything. Another thing, the gun is huge. If you were to make a high powered gun, it'd be even bigger. So your thinkin', "Well, I'll just lug it around in my car." Wrong, if you do, expect nothing on your car to work when you get done firing the thing at a couple of computers. It'll fry the computer in your car as well as the "enemies" computers. If you happen to get a car thats old enough not to have a computer in it, a high powered HERF gun will even fry the actual wiring. These HERF guns are very neat, but not practical yet. I hope someday we can actually build something that has some practicallity, and do the same as this lovely tool.

  5. Glubco Magnetron Info by Tackhead · · Score: 3
    Agreed. (All hail Glub!)

    For those who haven't seen the Glubco microwave weapon, it's even simpler and cheaper than the HERF. It's also a hell of a lot more dangerous.

    All you do is find an old microwave oven, tear it open, and remove the magnetron and associated HV power supply circuitry. You then build a small waveguide behind it so as not to fry yourself too badly. Point and shoot.

    Now that I've said this, and the script-kiddies are off Darwinating themselves out of the gene pool, here's what happens to them:

    1. Stupidity I. The capacitors in a high voltage supply on a microwave oven might not drain themselves automatically. If that happens, and the script kiddie is using both hands to play with the supply, he could fibrillate and die on the spot.
    2. Stupidity II: If he's using one hand to play with the supply, when he gets zapped, he scrapes his hand to hell when jumping away from the shock. A Dejanews search on why you have to discharge the anode of a TV set before working on the tube will provide much amusement.
    3. Stupidity III: All the nasty 120VAC bits are exposed, and our script kiddie doesn't use an isolation transformer, or does something similarly stupid. Bzzt, game over, thanks for playing.
    As you can see, it's easy to weed out a good chunk of the script kiddie population before they even finish building the damn thing. Now, suppose they survive this long...
    1. Leakage. They get internal burns because the waveguide wasn't built well enough. Visions of fingers turned into fried chicken wings come to mind as someone makes a waveguide that's short and easily-concealable, but that accidentally gives very wide dispersion.
    2. Reflection. More of the same. Y'know how your microwave oven works? Script kiddie points magnetron at a metal wall.
    3. Fire. Ever throw a CD in a microwave and not turn the microwave off after the pretty light show? The CD starts to smoke and burn. I'd imagine it'd be very easy to get the same thing to happen with the house wiring. And downright trivial to get it to happen to the traces on any printed circuit board.
    If I had to put money on it, I'd say the RF burns would be the most horrific side-effect of a kid playing with the Glubco magnetron weapon, but that the most probably side-effect would be that he burns down his own house while beta-testing it.

    Moral of the story: It's a cool idea. And in a situation of civil disorder (East Timor, anyone?) might be a handy field-expedient terror weapon - plug it into a wall socket in the target building, turn it on, and get the hell out of dodge while everything burns. For anything else, it's merely a quick and easy ticket out of the gene pool. Just like the bogus recipies in the "Anarchist's Cookbook", think of it as evolution in action.

  6. Several options... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3

    What you'll need is a makeshift parabolic reflector dish and something that works as a feed horn to source the signal. Something a little safer than this rube goldberg shown in the article (which, by the way, looks damned unsafe- gaps in the horns, etc... Easy way to get cateracts, leukemia, etc.) would be a coffee can and metal saucer sled combo for the antenna. The can makes for a sorry (and sloppy) feed horn, but it works and if you get the distance from the sled right, it works as expected and creates a decent columnated beam. Sloppy work, but it will point this mess more away from you than the other would.

  7. Its a tesla coil with a director/reflector antenna by anticypher · · Score: 5

    All this guy has done is built a simple pulsed DC Tesla coil using some sort of vibrator and a huge step-up transformer. Lots of people have done that, its nothing new.

    He'd have to have at least three stages of RLC circuits to get an efficient power coupling into the antenna and then radiated off into the ether (maybe he has, it doesn't show in the photo). Yes, it can be done by winding your own coils, and buying an old 20kV capacitor from an electric company auction or scrap dealer. Then you would have a very effective disruptor of unprotected electronics (but not likely to cause permanent damage except with a proximity of a few inches). Making it highly directional is left as an exercise for the student ;-)

    Years ago I helped tune a HUGE multi-stage step up system to duplicate the experiments of Nikola Tesla (sending spark gap morse code). This guy had built it into his garage, and had collected huge old power supplies from an old AM radio station to power it. We tested it briefly for a few seconds each evening. Whenever we worked on it, one of his cooler neighbors came over to play with it as well. Seems that every time it was switched on, all radio and cable TV reception in the area was overpowered. Fluorescent lights glowed up to 30 feet away, and nearby computers would crash.

    For a few months there were cable TV trucks patrolling his neighborhood with all kinds of detecting/directional antennas looking for the source of the HERF (he kept it off most of the time), eventually they posted reward notices on phone poles in the area. He dismantled his whole setup and moved it that day (his house has never been cleaner :-). Cops came around the next day with a search warrant, didn't find anything and left. Now he only does his experiments in an old barn in the middle of nowhere, with no electical lines nearby. Any cars driving near the place stall and the CD player will skip, and he advises leaving all credit cards and watches somewhere else when visiting. I think some day he will actually discover zero-point energy or tap into the earth's natural resonance of 12Hz.

    I cringe when I think of how this idea will be mutilated by the movie industry. A HERF gun that looks like an M16 or a .45 caliber pistol and shoots star-wars-like bolts of light, or the death ray in "Revenge of the Pink Panther", or the size of a packet of cigarets with some big LED numbers counting down with an audible click.

    the AC

    --
    Hemos is like...sci-fi fans;he thinks technology is cool, but he hasn't bothered to understand the science it's based on
  8. Not new news by joq · · Score: 3

    Now Microwave mind control would've been a bomb ass topic

    For hundreds of years, sci-fi writers have imagined weapons that
    might use energy waves or pulses to knock out, knock down, or
    otherwise disable enemies--without necessarily killing them. And
    for a good 40 years the U.S. military has quietly been pursuing
    weapons of this sort. Much of this work is still secret, and it
    has yet to produce a usable "nonlethal" weapon. But now that the
    cold war has ended and the United States is engaged in more
    humanitarian and peacekeeping missions, the search for weapons
    that could incapacitate people without inflicting lethal injuries
    has intensified. Police, too, are keenly interested. Scores of
    new contracts have been let, and scientists, aided by government
    research on the "bioeffects" of beamed energy, are searching the
    electromagnetic and sonic spectrums for wavelengths that can
    affect human behavior. Recent advancements in miniaturized
    electronics, power generation, and beam aiming may finally have
    put such pulse and beam weapons on the cusp of practicality, some
    experts say.

    Weapons already exist that use lasers, which can temporarily or
    permanently blind enemy soldiers. So-called acoustic or sonic
    weapons, like the ones in the aforementioned lab, can vibrate the
    insides of humans to stun them, nauseate them, or even "liquefy
    their bowels and reduce them to quivering diarrheic messes,"
    according to a Pentagon briefing. Prototypes of such weapons were
    recently considered for tryout when U.S. troops intervened in
    Somalia. Other, stranger effects also have been explored, such as
    using electromagnetic waves to put human targets to sleep or to
    heat them up, on the microwave-oven principle. Scientists are
    also trying to make a sonic cannon that throws a shock wave with
    enough force to knock down a man.

    While this and similar weapons may seem far-fetched, scientists
    say they are natural successors to projects already
    underway--beams that disable the electronic systems of aircraft,
    computers, or missiles, for instance. "Once you are into these
    antimateriel weapons, it is a short jump to antipersonnel
    weapons," says Louis Slesin, editor of the trade journal
    Microwave News. That's because the human body is essentially an
    electrochemical system, and devices that disrupt the electrical
    impulses of the nervous system can affect behavior and body
    functions. But these programs--particularly those involving
    antipersonnel research--are so well guarded that details are
    scarce. "People [in the military] go silent on this issue," says
    Slesin, "more than any other issue. People just do not want to
    talk about this."

    Projects underway. To learn what the Pentagon has been doing,
    U.S. News talked to more than 70 experts and scoured biomedical
    and engineering journals, contracts, budgets, and research
    proposals. The effort to develop exotic weapons is surprising in
    its range. Scores of projects are underway, most with funding of
    several hundred thousand dollars each. One Air Force lab plans to
    spend more than $100 million by 2003 to research the "bioeffects"
    of such weaponry.

    The benefits of bloodless battles for soldiers and law
    enforcement are obvious. But the search for new weapons--cloaked
    as they are in secrecy--faces hurdles. One is the acute
    skepticism of many conventional-weapons experts. "It is
    interesting technology but it won't end bloodshed and wars," says
    Harvey Sapolsky, director of the Security Studies Program at MIT.
    Says Charles Bernard, a former Navy weapons-research director: "I
    have yet to see one of these ray gun things that actually works."
    And if they do work, other problems arise: Some so-called
    nonlethal weapons could end up killing rather than just disabling
    victims if used at the wrong range. Others may easily be thwarted
    by shielding.

    Sterner warnings come from ethicists. Years ago the world drafted
    conventions and treaties to attempt to set rules for the use of
    bullets and bombs in war. But no treaties govern the use of
    unconventional weapons. And no one knows what will happen to
    people exposed to them over the long term.

    Moreover, medical researchers worry that their work on such
    things as the use of electromagnetic waves to stimulate hearing
    in the deaf or to halt seizures in epileptics might be used to
    develop weaponry. In fact, the military routinely has approached
    the National Institutes of Health for research information.
    "DARPA [Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency] has come to us
    every few years to see if there are ways to incapacitate the
    central nervous system remotely," Dr. F. Terry Hambrecht, head of
    the Neural Prosthesis Program at NIH, told U.S. News. "But
    nothing has ever come of it," he said. "That is too science
    fiction and far-fetched." Still, the Pentagon plans to conduct
    human testing with lasers and acoustics in the future, says
    Charles Swett, an assistant for Special Operations and
    Low-Intensity Conflict. Swett insists that the testing will be
    constrained and highly ethical. It may not be far off. The U.S.
    Air Force expects to have microwave weapons by the year 2015 and
    other nonlethal weaponry sooner. "When that does happen," warns
    Steven Metz, professor of national security affairs at the U.S.
    Army War College, "I think there will be a public uproar. We need
    an open debate on them now."

    Laser ethics

    What happened with U.S. forces in Somalia foreshadows the
    impending ethical dilemmas. In early 1995, some U.S. marines were
    supplied with so-called dazzling lasers. The idea was to inflict
    as little harm as possible if Somalis turned hostile. But the
    marines' commander then decided that the lasers should be
    "de-tuned" to prevent the chance of their blinding citizens. With
    their intensity thus diminished, they could be used only for
    designating or illuminating targets.

    On March 1, 1995, commandos of U.S. Navy SEAL Team 5 were
    positioned at the south end of Mogadishu airport. At 7 a.m., a
    technician from the Air Force's Phillips Laboratory, developer of
    the lasers, used one to illuminate a Somali man armed with a
    rocket-propelled grenade. A SEAL sniper shot and killed the
    Somali. There was no question the Somali was aiming at the SEALs.
    But the decision not to use the laser to dazzle or temporarily
    blind the man irks some of the nonlethal-team members. "We were
    not allowed to disable these guys because that was considered
    inhumane," said one. "Putting a bullet in their head is somehow
    more humane?"

    Despite such arguments, the International Red Cross and Human
    Rights Watch have since led a fight against antipersonnel lasers.
    In the fall of 1995, the United States signed a treaty that
    prohibits the development of lasers designed "to cause permanent
    blindness." Still, laser weapons are known to have been developed
    by the Russians, and proliferation is a big concern. Also, the
    treaty does not forbid dazzling or "glare" lasers, whose effects
    are temporary. U.S. military labs are continuing work in this
    area, and commercial contractors are marketing such lasers to
    police.

    Acoustic pain

    The next debate may well focus on acoustic or sonic weapons.
    Benign sonic effects are certainly familiar, ranging from the
    sonic boom from an airplane to the ultrasound instrument that
    "sees" a baby in the uterus. The military is looking for
    something less benign--an acoustic weapon with frequencies
    tunable all the way up to lethal. Indeed, Huntington Beach-based
    Scientific Applications & Research Associates Inc. (SARA) has
    built a device that will make internal organs resonate: The
    effects can run from discomfort to damage or death. If used to
    protect an area, its beams would make intruders increasingly
    uncomfortable the closer they get. "We have built several
    prototypes," says Parviz Parhami, SARA's CEO. Such acoustic
    fences, he says, could be deployed today. He estimates that five
    to 10 years will be needed to develop acoustic rifles and other
    more exotic weapons, but adds, "I have heard people as optimistic
    as one to two years." The military also envisions acoustic fields
    being used to control riots or to clear paths for convoys.

    SARA's acoustic devices have already been tested at the Camp
    Pendleton Marine Corps Base, near the company's Huntington Beach
    office. And they were considered for Somalia. "We asked for
    acoustics," says one nonlethal weapons expert who was there. But
    the Department of Defense said, "No," since they were still
    untested. The Pentagon feared they could have caused permanent
    injury to pregnant women, the old, or the sick. Parhami sees
    acoustics "as just one more tool" for the military and law
    enforcement. "Like any tool, I suppose this can be abused," he
    says. "But like any tool, it can be used in a humane and ethical
    way."

    Toward the end of World War II, the Germans were reported to have
    made a different type of acoustic device. It looked like a large
    cannon and sent out a sonic boomlike shock wave that in theory
    could have felled a B-17 bomber. In the mid-1940s, the U.S. Navy
    created a program called Project Squid to study the German vortex
    technology. The results are unknown. But Guy Obolensky, an
    American inventor, says he replicated the Nazi device in his
    laboratory in 1949. Against hard objects the effect was
    astounding, he says: It could snap a board like a twig. Against
    soft targets like people, it had a different effect. "I felt like
    I had been hit by a thick rubber blanket," says Obolensky, who
    once stood in its path. The idea seemed to founder for years
    until recently, when the military was intrigued by its nonlethal
    possibilities. The Army and Navy now have vortex projects
    underway. The SARA lab has tested its prototype device at Camp
    Pendleton, one source says.

    Electromagnetic heat

    The Soviets were known to have potent blinding lasers. They were
    also feared to have developed acoustic and radio-wave weapons.
    The 1987 issue of Soviet Military Power, a cold war Pentagon
    publication, warned that the Soviets might be close to "a
    prototype short-range tactical RF [radio frequency] weapon." The
    Washington Post reported that year that the Soviets had used such
    weapons to kill goats at 1 kilometer's range. The Pentagon, it
    turns out, has been pursuing similar devices since the 1960s.

    Typical of some of the more exotic proposals are those from Clay
    Easterly. Last December, Easterly--who works at the Health
    Sciences Research Division of Oak Ridge National
    Laboratory--briefed the Marine Corps on work he had conducted for
    the National Institute of Justice, which does research on crime
    control. One of the projects he suggested was an electromagnetic
    gun that would "induce epilepticlike seizures." Another was a
    "thermal gun [that] would have the operational effect of heating
    the body to 105 to 107" degrees Fahrenheit. Such effects would
    bring on discomfort, fevers, or even death.

    But, unlike the work on blinding lasers and acoustic weapons,
    progress here has been slow. The biggest problem is power.
    High-powered microwaves intended to heat someone standing 200
    yards away to 105 degrees Fahrenheit may kill someone standing 10
    yards away. On the other hand, electromagnetic fields weaken
    quickly with distance from the source. And beams of such energy
    are difficult to direct to their target. Mission Research Corp.
    of Albuquerque, N.M., has used a computer model to study the
    ability of microwaves to stimulate the body's peripheral nervous
    system. "If sufficient peripheral nerves fire, then the body
    shuts down to further stimulus, producing the so-called stun
    effect," an abstract states. But, it concludes, "the ranges at
    which this can be done are only a few meters."

    Nonetheless, government laboratories and private contractors are
    pursuing numerous similar programs. A 1996 Air Force Scientific
    Advisory Board report on future weapons, for instance, includes a
    classified section on a radio frequency or "RF Gunship." Other
    military documents confirm that radio-frequency antipersonnel
    weapons programs are underway. And the Air Force's Armstrong
    Laboratory at Brooks Air Force Base in Texas is heavily engaged
    in such research. According to budget documents, the lab intends
    to spend more than $110 million over the next six years "to
    exploit less-than-lethal biological effects of electromagnetic
    radiation for Air Force security, peacekeeping, and war-fighting
    operations."

    Low-frequency sleep

    From 1980 to 1983, a man named Eldon Byrd ran the Marine Corps
    Nonlethal Electromagnetic Weapons project. He conducted most of
    his research at the Armed Forces Radiobiology Research Institute
    in Bethesda, Md. "We were looking at electrical activity in the
    brain and how to influence it," he says. Byrd, a specialist in
    medical engineering and bioeffects, funded small research
    projects, including a paper on vortex weapons by Obolensky. He
    conducted experiments on animals--and even on himself--to see if
    brain waves would move into sync with waves impinging on them
    from the outside. (He found that they would, but the effect was
    short lived.)

    By using very low frequency electromagnetic radiation--the waves
    way below radio frequencies on the electromagnetic spectrum--he
    found he could induce the brain to release behavior-regulating
    chemicals. "We could put animals into a stupor," he says, by
    hitting them with these frequencies. "We got chick brains--in
    vitro--to dump 80 percent of the natural opioids in their
    brains," Byrd says. He even ran a small project that used
    magnetic fields to cause certain brain cells in rats to release
    histamine. In humans, this would cause instant flulike symptoms
    and produce nausea. "These fields were extremely weak. They were
    undetectable," says Byrd. "The effects were nonlethal and
    reversible. You could disable a person temporarily," Byrd
    hypothesizes. "It [would have been] like a stun gun."

    Byrd never tested any of his hardware in the field, and his
    program, scheduled for four years, apparently was closed down
    after two, he says. "The work was really outstanding," he
    grumbles. "We would have had a weapon in one year." Byrd says he
    was told his work would be unclassified, "unless it works."
    Because it worked, he suspects that the program "went black."
    Other scientists tell similar tales of research on
    electromagnetic radiation turning top secret once successful
    results were achieved. There are clues that such work is
    continuing. In 1995, the annual meeting of four-star U.S. Air
    Force generals--called CORONA--reviewed more than 1,000 potential
    projects. One was called "Put the Enemy to Sleep/Keep the Enemy
    From Sleeping." It called for exploring "acoustics,"
    "microwaves," and "brain-wave manipulation" to alter sleep
    patterns. It was one of only three projects approved for initial
    investigation.

    Direct contact

    As the military continues its search for nonlethal weapons, one
    device that works on contact has already hit the streets. It is
    called the "Pulse Wave Myotron." A sales video shows it in
    action. A big, thuggish-looking "criminal" approaches a
    well-dressed woman. As he tries to choke her, she touches him
    with a white device about the size of a pack of cigarettes. He
    falls to the floor in a fetal position, seemingly paralyzed but
    with eyes open, and he does not recover for minutes.

    "Contact with the Myotron," says the narrator, "feels like
    millions of tiny needles are sent racing through the body. This
    is a result of scrambling the signals from the motor cortex
    region of the brain," he says. "It is horrible," says William
    Gunby, CEO of the company that developed the Myotron. "It is no
    toy." The Myotron overrides voluntary--but not
    involuntary--muscle movements, so the victim's vital functions
    are maintained. Sales are targeted at women, but law enforcement
    officers and agencies--including the Arizona state police and
    bailiffs with the New York Supreme Court--have purchased the
    device, Gunby says. A special model built for law enforcement,
    called the Black Widow, is being tested by the FBI, he says. "I
    hope they don't order a lot soon," he adds. "The Russian
    government just ordered 100,000 of them, and I need to replenish
    my stock."

    The U.S. military also has shown interest in the Myotron. "About
    the time of the gulf war, I got calls from people in the
    military," recalls Gunby. "They asked me about bonding the
    Myotron's pulse wave to a laser beam so that everyone in the path
    of the laser would collapse." While it could not be done, Gunby
    says, he nonetheless was warned to keep quiet. "I was told that
    these calls were totally confidential," he says, "and that they
    would completely deny it if I ever mentioned it."

    Some say such secrecy is necessary in new-weapons development.
    But others think it is a mistake. "Because the programs are
    secret, the sponsorship is low level, and the technology is
    unconventional," says William Arkin of Human Rights Watch Arms
    Project, "the military has not done any of the things to
    determine if the money is being well spent or the programs are a
    good idea." It should not be long before the evidence is in.

    Original article written by: By Douglas Pasternak

    related topics

  9. Oooh. This is great! by mcolin · · Score: 4

    Now I can finally shut down those Britney Spears sounds my neighbor is bombarding our street with. Aaaah, blissful silence!

  10. A boon for Y2K consultants. by bob_jordan · · Score: 3

    Just think what this sort of technology would be worth to y2k consultants! There you are doing your sales pitch of why a company must hire you to fix all there computers. You set the clock of one of their computers to a few seconds before 2000 and as they are busy watching the screen, all it takes is a nonchalant wave of an arm near a window and every computer in the building chrashes. Eat your heart out Dogbert. And of course if there are any companies that don't pay up, you can pay them a visit on New Years Eve and turn the power up.

    Bob.

    (Who if you can't tell, is joking)

  11. Imagine the possibilities by emag · · Score: 4
    I've wanted to build one of these things for at least 8 years now, but have never had a) the time, b) the knowledge, c) the motivation. Especially after reading (parts of) Winn Schwarau's "Information Warfare" doorstop, I could just see the potential uses for this.

    Imagine one of these scenarios:
    • You're driving down the highway, blissfully ignorant of the speed limit. Suddenly, you see those blue and red lights flashing behind you. Panic? You? Nah. You hit that extra button below the rear defroster, and suddenly you're in the clear. Or better yet, you let yourself get pulled over, and then while waiting to ask if there's a problem, the other car starts acting funny...

    • From the book: Someone in a van drives around the computing center of a bank. Hits a button. Computers start to drool. Wait a random amount of time, do it again.

    • Your (former) employer doesn't believe that they need to worry about information warfare because "the firewall will protect us." Wait for the night before a drop, or the day of a demo, and suddenly the development machines, not to mention the firewall, are dead.


    As much as I'd love to have plans for one of these HERF guns, I think that it would probably make it too easy for "hardware script kiddies" to then go out and wreak havoc. What I'd really like is a reading list (preferably with difficulty ratings) on what to study to be able to design your own.
    --
    "The urge to save humanity is almost always a false front for the urge to rule." --H.L. Mencken
  12. "Rash of local accidents traced to child hackers" by Hrunting · · Score: 3

    Actually, knowing all our script kiddie friends, they would probably be rolling along in their parents' brand-new Expedition or something and be trying this thing out. Somehow, I doubt a script kiddie would be smart enough to realize that it's going to affect their car as well.

    I can see the headlines now (and they're not getting the terminology correct)!

  13. Possible use of this device by Markee · · Score: 5

    Everyone's afraid of a new class of terrorism that seems to be emerging. Bombing and shooting people is for dumbos. These days, smart terrorists disrupt the use of technologies like phone, cell phone and computers. This is a device for them.
    Imagine this device placed near a major phone line hub... within view of a cell phone transmitter... on a highway bridge, the latest "drive-by-wire" cars passing beneath it... on an airport... at a stock exchange... Devices like this, at a handy size, could be as dangerous to economics as a gun is to an individual.
    I wonder if there is a law against things like that.

    --
    Yes, you are right there. -- Another glass of champagne?