SCO To Invest in LinuxMall

Jason Perlow noted a story that popped up at ZD Net talking about a new investor at LinuxMall. Sco has entered the Linux World with an investment in the web store. Its interesting to note that they talk about doing this as publicity.

Comments

so what?

[Suydam]

I'm no longer impressed with the various companies that invest in Linux. Before you call this "flamebait" listen to why.

The Good Old Days: The first few companies to invest in Linux (IBM, Intel, etc.) did so for 2 reasons. 1) Money. They wouldn't do it if it wasn't going to make them some money. 2) Interest/Excitement. I truly believe that a year or so ago when they were giving money to RedHat, these large corporations saw something exciting in Linux. They wanted to be a part of it (for reason #1) and they thought that it might be a good way to expand their reach.

New World Order: Nowadays, companies like SCO and Sun just invest in Linux (or open source parts of their software) out of mere survival. THey're afraid that if they don't hitch themselves to the rising star that is Linux, they'll just go out of business.

I"m not saying I resent their investment,and I'm not saying it's a bad idea. But I AM saying that it's no longer impressive or newsworthy.

Re:so what?

[nevets]

I wouldn't say that it's not newsworthy, but I would say that it's not a shocker.

But I am interested in what companys are investing in Linux. Especially when my manager asks me why I choose Linux instead of other operating systems. If there is another company investment in Linux, it makes it easier to discuss this with my manager.

So, please keep posting these articles. Their not shockers, but they are "newsworthy".

Steven Rostedt

SCO's Linux strategy

[Ledge Kindred]

Anyone else getting more and more curious over what exactly SCO's Linux "strategy" is? I mean, one the one hand, they seem to take lots of opportunities to bad-mouth it to the public in general and their customers in particular, then about-face and apologise that they "didn't mean it like that." They'll make statements that they don't see a future in Linux and then turn around and invest in Linux-based companies.

I'm starting to wonder if SCO might be more of a "threat" to Linux than Sun. I really don't like Sun's attitude towards Linux and I know they're scared of it on the low end. (Not the E10K sized servers, but the Ultra 5, Ultra 10, and that range.) Sun seems to be doing a lot to sidetrack, derail, and otherwise just sort of take whatever momentum they can from the growing popularity of Linux with stuff like their SCSL and their so-called "Open Sourcing" of Solaris and the purchase and "release of source code" for Star Office.

However, I'm starting to believe that SCO might actually be taking a more discrete approach to derailing Linux since it competes directly on exactly the same platform and in the same market.

Perhaps SCO will get itself entrenched in several of the larger Linux companies, then in a few months or a few years, make some sort of announcement to the effect, "Well, we tried this Linux thing by investing in all these Linux companies, but, as the world's leading supplier of UNIX operating systems for the PC platform, we feel qualified in stating unequivocably that 'Linux isn't working.' Everyone go home and buy SCO from now on."

Not that I think it would have a whole lot of effect, but it would probably shake things up at least.

In any case, SCO is starting to worry and confuse me.

-=-=-=-=-

Re:hypocrits

[scumdamn]

You weren't out of line on that one. We just have a few thin skinned moderators who think anything said "in a loud voice" is flaimbate. Of course, I'm "trolling" because I disagree.
Maybe I'm just "offtopic".

Imagine...

[scumdamn]

Congratulations! You've purchased a Linux distribution! Linux is a Unix based operating system. Did you know that Santa Cruz Operations is the leading seller of Unix on Intel? We are. If you like Linux, you'll love full Unix. SCO Unix isn't a Unix Lite like Linux. SCO is based on the AT&T code that started the Unix tradition, not some fad operating system like Linux. SCO Unix is available for free for a limited time for non-commercial use. Unlike Linux, SCO can be used commercially, but it costs money to do so. Of course, SCO Unix can be used in mission critical applications, Unlike Linux, so it's well worth it. To recieve your free (minus $20 shipping and handling) copy of SCO Unix reply to this message with INTERESTED in the first line of the body as well as your name, address, and phone number. A SCO representative will call you within 24 hours.
Follow the Unix Tradition: SCO



Not likely, but not out of the realm of possibilities.

SCO entering the Linux World

[jbgreer]

Now wait a second, SCO didn't just enter the Linux World. Slashdot has reported two earlier incidents: SCO joined Linux International (http://slashdot.org/articles/98/12/04/1530208.sht ml) and SCO announced Linux Support (http://slashdot.org/articles/99/08/14/1527243.sht ml). One of the posters asks the question: Is SCO discretely trying to wreck Linux? Unlike IBM, SCO isn't that big of a company. I don't think they can afford to have conflicting strategies regarding Linux; that is, that can't count on their Linux support services as a revenue stream while simultaneously bashing Linux. The press releases we have seen from SCO have come at different times; I think they reflect SCO's efforts to formulate strategy, of which their are (broadly) two responses: fight'em or join'em. I think this is further evidence that they've picked the join'em strategy.... that they are counting on picking up business from those folks who have started to realize that NT isn't the holy grail, that Linux is good for SCO's interest.