Linux After Y2K
jonathan_ingram writes "Through some strange twist in the space-time continuum, Linux Today has received Joe Pranevich's
Wonderful World of Linux 3.0
one year early... Nice to know RMS will still be around after the
end of civilisation." Um ... yeah. You may want to read up on Abacus World Expo before you try to figure out what Joe P. is talking about in this story.
Firstly, Is any support for palm-top abaci being planned? And second, I'm wondering when FreeBSD will release their own bead platform Any help on these would be greatly appreciated.
Either go up to london and steal Babbage's differential engine (Even if it doesnt run linux, it looks damn pretty while its working out log tables) or live in an old mill I know that has a few hundred watt generator in it. (powered by water, I think that's Y2k compliant)
-Yarn - Rio Karma: Excellent
I guess the real question is the SMP support... I mean, what if I want to put my aLinux rectangle down and use both hands...
Hell, if a friend comes over and uses his hands, how well does the aLinux implementation scale to 4 hands and beyond... I believe Sun has a aSolaris implementation where the racks are so spread out that 256 hands can work on it simulatenously...
Alex
If we make pocket versions of aLinux it should beat the crap out of Microsoft's AbacusCE
AbacusCE is a totally closed design (the glued it together with super-glue) whereas aLinux is put together with screws. so you can customize it (change the color of the balls etc.)
---
30,000 beads is not nearly enough to run X...
:)
I guess the NSA will have rooms full of these things running some proprietary SMP bead-manipulating operating system to break our high-tech Triple-XOR implementations.
---
pb Reply rather than vaguely moderate me.
pb Reply or e-mail; don't vaguely moderate.
-- Give him Head? Be a Beacon?
-- Give him Head? Be a Beacon? :P)
(If you can't figure out how to E-Mail me, Don't.
Will aLinux 3.0 support fault tolerand abacii? This vxab stuff from Stratacus has got my beads in a twist. I've got to merge the beads of two abacii (both of them having been previously used) and the docs are'nt the most informative. Unfortunatly the aLinux HOWTOs don't apply to aFTX. Arg, bloody proprietary abacii and OSs.
Bill - aka taniwha
--
Leave others their otherness. -- Aratak
Sure, but if your operations aren't thread-save, you run the risk of corrupting your beads and threads resulting in a tangles mess.
Bill - aka taniwha
--
Leave others their otherness. -- Aratak