Slashdot Mirror

← Back to Stories (view on slashdot.org)

Linux After Y2K

Posted by ryuzaki0 on from the 640-beads-of-RAM-is-enough-for-anyone dept.

jonathan_ingram writes "Through some strange twist in the space-time continuum, Linux Today has received Joe Pranevich's Wonderful World of Linux 3.0 one year early... Nice to know RMS will still be around after the end of civilisation." Um ... yeah. You may want to read up on Abacus World Expo before you try to figure out what Joe P. is talking about in this story.

5 of 26 comments (clear)

  1. SMP Support by alexhmit01 · · Score: 3

    I guess the real question is the SMP support... I mean, what if I want to put my aLinux rectangle down and use both hands...

    Hell, if a friend comes over and uses his hands, how well does the aLinux implementation scale to 4 hands and beyond... I believe Sun has a aSolaris implementation where the racks are so spread out that 256 hands can work on it simulatenously...

    Alex

  2. Agh! by pb · · Score: 3

    30,000 beads is not nearly enough to run X...

    I guess the NSA will have rooms full of these things running some proprietary SMP bead-manipulating operating system to break our high-tech Triple-XOR implementations. :)
    ---
    pb Reply rather than vaguely moderate me.

    --
    pb Reply or e-mail; don't vaguely moderate.
  3. Wow! Talk about advancement by Accipiter · · Score: 3
    Linux 3.0 is nice. But what about remote administration? No problem. I've solved that with The StickTM. The StickTM allows you to control your Linux box--err Abacus from up to 6 feet away! This way, you can fend off wild looters while rebooting your abacus. (NOTE: If the looters get a bit too rowdy, The StickTM can also be used as a weapon.)

    -- Give him Head? Be a Beacon?

    --

    -- Give him Head? Be a Beacon?
    (If you can't figure out how to E-Mail me, Don't. :P)

  4. Fault tolerance? by Bill+Currie · · Score: 3

    Will aLinux 3.0 support fault tolerand abacii? This vxab stuff from Stratacus has got my beads in a twist. I've got to merge the beads of two abacii (both of them having been previously used) and the docs are'nt the most informative. Unfortunatly the aLinux HOWTOs don't apply to aFTX. Arg, bloody proprietary abacii and OSs.

    --

    Bill - aka taniwha
    --
    Leave others their otherness. -- Aratak

  5. Re:multi threading? by Bill+Currie · · Score: 3

    Sure, but if your operations aren't thread-save, you run the risk of corrupting your beads and threads resulting in a tangles mess.

    --

    Bill - aka taniwha
    --
    Leave others their otherness. -- Aratak