Slashdot Mirror


Tucows Opens Domain Name Registry

Tucows.com is still working on the site, but their Open Shared Registration System should be ready to go by November15. There's an API to proxy through their accredited server into the domain name database. Anyone can write their own client software based on theirs, which is GPLed. Their take is $13/year, easily the lowest yet: the idea is for others to customize their own client software, add value, resell domains, and start the price war.

61 comments

  1. Re:WTF? by freejack · · Score: 1
    Actually, the $13 is an all in fee. $9 to NSI, $4 to OpenSRS. Our $4 goes back into the pool to support the development, pay for hardware, bandwidth et al.



    Unlike a lot of domain resale programs, this is not an extra fee that is tacked on top of NSI's $70 reg fee.



    -RWR, OpenSRS Maintainer

    --
    "Although we may build the technology that we define as tools, we must be vigilant that those tools do not define us."
  2. Re:Cool news, but NSI still have the monopoly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    domains can be transferred from NSI. register.com will do this, at cost of $70 of course. this would allow one to do it at a minimum.

  3. Cool Idea by tomblackwell · · Score: 1

    It's good to see the Open Source paradigm come to the bitter and twisted world of domain registration. I hope this does well.

    It's also good to see a website go live with even less content than mine did! Lets hope they're dreaming up some intelligent, robust methods to impliment their scheme.

  4. Re:WTF? by freejack · · Score: 1
    Just went though the OpenSRS site again, but found it to be almost useless for general information/overview. Are there any other related links that anyone knows of?

    I've been stuck at a show this week - getting the site updated is a huge priority but it's been real rough getting decent connectivity. Anyways, I'm sitting on a ton of info that will likely go up this weekend, including a new iteration of the contract, v1.3 of the API documentation, the getting started guide and (cross your fingers) the first release of the client code.

    -RWR, OpenSRS Maintainer

    --
    "Although we may build the technology that we define as tools, we must be vigilant that those tools do not define us."
  5. Re:I know this is a bit offtopic but... by Billy+Donahue · · Score: 2

    Name.Space is the company you're talking about. This company has been doing registrations for new TLDs for 3 years. The windows software you're talking about only changes your DNS to point to one of the many name servers that carry Name.Space's zones. The .com .org .net space is way too crowded, and NSI will have to open the root zones for these new TLDs sooner or later... So it's not just a novelty registration..

    --
    -- The Funk, The Whole Funk, And Nothing But The Funk
  6. Re:CORE costs by freejack · · Score: 1
    I thought that CORE and ICANN both get a cut too somewhere in the range of $29. I may be wrong but I would think that the actual base cost will be TUCOWS' $13 cut PLUS CORE and ICANN charges... for a total of around $42.

    Nope, $13 all in.

    -RWR, OpenSRS Maintainer

    --
    "Although we may build the technology that we define as tools, we must be vigilant that those tools do not define us."
  7. Re:So what's a good service? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Id also recommend voxel i have 3 domains hosted with them and am very happy. plus they are giving back a decent percentage of their profits back to the fsf community and i think they offer free hosting for gpl'ed projects

    as for domain registration, the cheapest ive seen is an australian company called totalnic which charges 35 per domain for 2 years. theres a bunch of core resellers listing on the corenic webpage.

    hope some of this linkage helps


    - jim k.

  8. Re:So what's a good service? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    CubeSoft charges $10/mo for a virtual host and that includes a domain name, a shell account on the Linux box that's hosting your site, PHP3, Perl, etc....

  9. Re:My question... by NotQuiteSonic · · Score: 1

    www.joker.com is cheaper. 20.45 Euro, or around 67.60 cdn for two years or around $20/year us I believe

  10. Why cater to resellers? Help end users instead! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Their service is "designed to allow domain name resellers that are not ICANN or NSI affiliated to register domain names at wholesale prices."

    Why not let individual end users register domain names at wholesale prices instead? That would be truly liberating and enabling.

  11. Cool news, but NSI still have the monopoly by mmerlin · · Score: 1
    What does the following snippet of info mean?

    the main points of the agreement focus on;
    • Protecting the intellectual property of Network Solutions used in the deployment of the OpenSRS server at TUCOWS.

    I interpret it as meaning we can't move our domain names from NSI over to OpenSRS. If anyone finds out a way to do it, let us know!



    --

    smile, it makes everyone else wonder what you're up to :-)
    1. Re:Cool news, but NSI still have the monopoly by tallbloke · · Score: 2

      From the TUCOWS SRS site
      http://www.opensrs.com/OpenSRSDRAv1.0.1.txt

      2.8 The Reseller agrees to assist, when requested by TUCOWS, in the facilitation of transfers of SLD
      registrations from another registrar to TUCOWS and vice versa pursuant to NSI's policy on Changes in
      Sponsoring Registrar by SLD Holders appended to the NSI Agreement as Exhibit B thereto (the NSI
      Change in Registrar Policy?).

      I haven't read through the NSI policy yet, but it seems to me that this implies that they may be hoisted on their own petard

      This would be good news for ISP's renewing long standing customers TLD's

    2. Re:Cool news, but NSI still have the monopoly by freejack · · Score: 2
      Cool news, but NSI still have the monopoly (Score:) by mmerlin on 05:38 AM October 28th, 1999 EDT (#) (User Info) http://www.dv3.com What does the following snippet of info mean? the main points of the agreement focus on; Protecting the intellectual property of Network Solutions used in the deployment of the OpenSRS server at TUCOWS. I interpret it as meaning we can't move our domain names from NSI over to OpenSRS. If anyone finds out a way to do it, let us know!

      Actually, that bit simply refers to the back-end piece that allows the OpenSRS to interface with NSI-SRS. It is a completely proprietary interface that we were required to sign a contract to use.

      -RWR, OpenSRS Maintainer

      --
      "Although we may build the technology that we define as tools, we must be vigilant that those tools do not define us."
  12. TUCOWS?!? Hmmm... by Szoup · · Score: 2

    So, will they be providing a ratings system for our domain selections:

    * 4 cows for the domain name frootlupz.com
    * 0 cows for the domain name sexwithfrootlupz.com

    ...

    -------------------------------------------

  13. Re:Irresponsible Price War Promotion by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've never heard of the cycle you describe happening. And I reject your parallel to the USSR. Things sometimes *do* change. One example is the PC market, where better goods get cheaper every year. No other market has ever done with. Also, what's wrong with Cuba? It works pretty well, and would work even better if the US weren't too immature to trade with them. Also, there will always be some money in a system, just not necessarily much. Companies will desire to make profits, and they will. Further, you're assuming that domain names are a pure fungible. They aren't. As an ISP, you provide a whole host of services, so that there is differentiation. I would rather get net service from (say) Verio and pay more because they are right on the backbone. -Dave Turner, AC of convinience

  14. Re:Domain names are a commodity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2
    So, I'm assuming that the post I'm replying to wasn't a complete come-on to get people to angrily reply and waste their energy. It sure sounds like one, though.

    Domain names are a product it takes almost zero skill and resources to "produce". They are grossly, horridly overpriced today. The faster the price falls, the better. As for your "destructive competition" theory, bollocks to that. I can only wish that Network Solutions will some day be driven out of business and bankrupted.

  15. So what's a good service? by afniv · · Score: 2

    So where is the best place to get a domain name registered and perhaps have some web pages hosted. I can't get anything better than modem phone line access. DSL has been a long time coming and still no success.

    Perhaps someone can share their shopping experience?

    ~afniv
    "Man könnte froh sein, wenn die Luft so rein wäre wie das Bier"

    --
    ~afniv
    "Man könnte froh sein, wenn die Luft so rein wäre wie das Bier"
    Richard von Weizs
    1. Re:So what's a good service? by crisco · · Score: 1
      For hosting you might try Hurricane Electric. Their servers use Linux and let you use PHP3 and MySQL. All starting at $9.95 a month. They're fast for me, they're only a hop or two from MAEWest (maybe not a good thing) and overall I'm quite happy. I've only used them for a month though, so YMMV. They currently register through NSI so you'd have to register it yourself using one of these alternate Name Servers.

      There was another hosting service that advertised on Slashdot a while back. I don't have the URL handy, might not have it at all anymore.

      --

      Bleh!

    2. Re:So what's a good service? by MindStalker · · Score: 2

      Yea, I also like the fact that you can edit the dns entries on them for your domain. I have a domain through Hurricane Electric. And all I use them for is dns routing. As my ip changes occasionally and I don't have the ability of running a dns server. Note: I wouldn't suggest something like this is your ip changes constently aka dialup/cable modem.

    3. Re:So what's a good service? by Sentry21 · · Score: 1

      I find CheetaWeb is a great place. They have PHP4 beta, mySQL, Perl, SSI, shell, you name it.

      Great place, the admin is friendly, always willing to help (then again, I volunteered my account as the default testbed for anything new that might go horribly wrong, so I probably get some slack there =] )

      Oh yeah, it's Mandrake running on a P450, couple hundred meg of RAM, blah blah. Unless you're serving an ebay or CDROM.com mirror, it's great.

      ~Sentry21~

  16. CORE costs by ddpg · · Score: 1

    I thought that CORE and ICANN both get a cut too somewhere in the range of $29. I may be wrong but I would think that the actual base cost will be TUCOWS' $13 cut PLUS CORE and ICANN charges... for a total of around $42.

    Anyone have anymore info on these other costs?

    Peter Gogas
    ddpg@tekindex.net

  17. Re:Do I own my domain or am I just renting it? by Billy+Donahue · · Score: 1

    You can renew with anyone you want... NSI can't hold you prisoner... My company Name.Space would be happy to renew your domain registration.

    --
    -- The Funk, The Whole Funk, And Nothing But The Funk
  18. Re:WTF? by BorgDrone · · Score: 0

    ...who have nothing better to do at 2am than wait around to make the first post...

    When it's 2am at your place, it doesn't meant it has to be 2am at my place! the internet is a global thing, so is slashdot!


    ---

  19. Re:My question... by ChazeFroy · · Score: 1

    Unfortunately, $70 per domain is the cheapest available right now; but at least you get the domain for two years.

    I highly suggest register.com: They make it extremely easy to change administrative contacts, IP addresses/nameservers, and whatever else that's relevant to your domain name.

  20. Re:API in C major by Corrado · · Score: 1
    They are already planning on doing this.

    From their Client FAQ page:
    Our current development track includes a NT DLL Client for OpenSRS. We are planning to ship Perl "wrapper" functions for the actual C function calls for the Linux/Solaris environment, and see no reason why we should not ship something similar for the NT environment.

    Later...

    --
    KangarooBox - We make IT simple!
  21. impressive.. by devonh · · Score: 0

    as a female, i can safely say that cracking microsoft would impress me a hell of a lot more than anything else..

    except maybe cracking netsol ;)

    --
    Disclaimer: I do not condone any illegal activity. I forgot to sleep last night and I've had way too much coffee. :)

    1. Re:impressive.. by devonh · · Score: 1

      damnit.. this was supposed to be attached to the most recent poll..

      ignore me :)

  22. I know this is a bit offtopic but... by Ater · · Score: 1

    I remember a while back there is/was some site that let you register your own domain name AND extension (e.g. www.my.page) or something to that nature, and I also remember getting a "domain" during some promotional day where registration was free. I think there was also a deal where you had to download a certain program (windows native if I remember correctly) that would actually allow you to view the little domain you created. Could anybody elaborate on this? Perhaps if the requirement to download the program were done away with, this could be a viable method of domain registration that could further lower the prices for a domain and help eliminate domain name abuse.

  23. Re:Irresponsible Price War Promotion by Malcontent · · Score: 1

    This is a silly argument. If it were true it would apply to everything which is subject to competition. The price would drop, profits would wither etc. Having low cost (or free) alternatives keeps the businesses honest and competitive. It prevents them from gauging the consumers and that a Good Thing.

    --

    War is necrophilia.

  24. Re:A Cheap Way To Be A Registrar by Imperator · · Score: 2
    Realistically, no company is going to sell registrations for less than $15 or so. If you really want to, why not register it yourself? I'm sure we'll see some clients appearing on freshmeat a short time after this gets started. At that price, service is what counts, not price. A dollar or two don't make much difference compared to a difference between good service and No Service Inc.

    OTOH, if you depend on this, you're taking the risk that they'll remove the system and force you to pay huge fees.

    --

    Gates' Law: Every 18 months, the speed of software halves.
  25. Re:Hey.. But .. I liked my .cx by mindstrm · · Score: 1

    People haven't done this before because Network Solutions has SOLE CONTROL of the .com, .net, and .org domains, and nobody but them, until very recently, could insert names into the root zones.

  26. Re:My question... by Anonymous Cow · · Score: 1

    Totalnic is the cheapest. $14/year.

  27. Re:WTF? by mindstrm · · Score: 1

    What do you mean you still have to pay InterNIC? (You mean Network Solutions, right?)

    You don't. You pay the accreditted registrar who registered your domain for you. In this case, tucows. (yes, Network Solutions sees some of this money)

  28. Re:Hurry, register your domains BEFORE this comes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I like MailBank having registered my surname. It means that it's available to everybody with my surname instead of just to the first SOB that gets it and decides to keep it for himself. Their rates are also cheaper than registering the domain yourself. What MailBank is doing is far different from domain name squatting, in which somebody registers a domain merely in order to extract a higher price for it from some other individual or company.

  29. Re:A Cheap Way To Be A Registrar by jbrw · · Score: 1

    Here's an article about reacto.com which appears to be doing something very similar to TUCOWS, except, erm, they're charging $130,000 to set you up to allow you to sell domains.

    Or have I missed the point of reacto.com?

  30. Re: Forgot to mention the price by Sentry21 · · Score: 1

    Cost is $4.95/mo for 6 month prepay. Save some people some time going there.

  31. Re:Do I own my domain or am I just renting it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think 'renting' is closer to the truth, though that's technically not what it is either.
    The courts may see it in different ways, however.

    As for how it works, it's like this.
    There are a series of root nameservers. These hold (among other things) the nameserver references (NS records) for all the 2nd level .com, .net, and .org domains. (and others not relevant to this discussion).
    As to who runs these, I havent' checked in a whilel, but they are at various universities and government institutions, I believe.
    Network Solutions was given the task of co-ordinating and running the InterNIC many years ago. Their task was to allow people to register domains. There are really two databases in effect when you register a domain.
    1) The DNS records themselves. (entries in the root servers)
    2) The Whois database (as people call it). This is where you find out who has registered what domain, etc...

    Initially, this was free.
    Then, one day, Network Solutions decided that they required $50/year per domain in order to deal with the 'volume'.


    What's changing now is that the ICANN has been formed, and this power is being taken away from Network Solutions (who has abused it greatly IMHO). There will be many organizations who can insert names into the namespace.

  32. Re:Hurry, register your domains BEFORE this comes by weave · · Score: 1
    I like MailBank having registered my surname. It means that it's available to everybody with my surname instead of just to the first SOB that gets it and decides to keep it for himself.

    Good point. I now have a notice on my web page that I will provide free e-mail and/or web site redirect aliases to anyone with a Weaverling surname -- for free.

    Their rates are also cheaper than registering the domain yourself.

    Not cheaper than free! It's just one entry in a table and an occasional forwarded mail message. $9.95/mo (what mailbank charges for an alias) is ridiculous. Registering 12,000 names and common words is also insane.

  33. Re: Domain names are a commodity by WiliLojik · · Score: 2

    While I hardly think that the 70 dollars that Network Solutions charges for domains is a reasonable price (except for the unarguable fact that people pay it, same reason SUVs are 30 grand), Network Solutions does run the root DNS servers, as well as those for .com, .net, and .org. Keep in mind that without these servers no domain name resolution would be possible under the current system and someone has to do it. This is not a service that I am really interested in seeing cost undercut, I would rather a bit more robust than needed system actually.

    And for those that may argue that people pay 70 dollars for the domains because they have no choice that is hardly true, you can use subdomains (witness ae.breakset.com, candra.breakset.com, etc) as well as bastardize the country TLDs and get yourself a .nu domain for 40 bucks or whatever the price is these days.

  34. And could I get that in english??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I looked at the website and all it had was legal junk!!! I saw the part about $13, but how does that work. Is that all you have to pay to register as many domains as you want? If so, it sounds great to me, especially considering I want a domain name, but don't want to pay somewhere around $70 per year. Steven Roos im2smrt4u@NOSPAMyahoo.com

  35. NSI rant. by noMan · · Score: 1

    Finally we get to see an end to NSI's ugly system. If I had to interact with that one more time...

  36. Re:WTF? by dr · · Score: 1
    Not that it's any excuse but, it's almost 3am and I've been up since 6am (mostly coding) ... :)

    Just went though the OpenSRS site again, but found it to be almost useless for general information/overview. Are there any other related links that anyone knows of?

  37. Re:WTF? by Achates · · Score: 0
    Maybe the first 5-10 posts should display the user's IP so we can ridicule those who have nothing better to do at 2am than wait around to make the first post
    While at one level I agree with this.. The "First Post War" has gotten VERY VERY old, I still cannot justify in my mind having the first few posts show IPs. There are still some legitimate posts that make it into this range and I know I wouldn't my ip showing. As if not showing it does any good but that is a WHOLE other rant. :) In closing... May your women and your source code always come freely to you. :) HEH
    ----
  38. WTF? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You still have to pay InterNIC... what's the point?

    1. Re:WTF? by dr · · Score: 3
      You still have to pay InterNIC... what's the point?

      Ahh, but you won't have to pay as much (hopefully). This in turn will result in more money in your pocket each year (for beer). And it will add up to a bunch of savings for those of us who seem to have collected a bunch of domains during our travels (legitimately, not due to so-called squatting).

      As a side note, I'd like to express my awe at the whole first post game. I still don't get it. Let it go already. Maybe the first 5-10 posts should display the user's IP so we can ridicule those who have nothing better to do at 2am than wait around to make the first post, with no inciteful text in the posting.

    2. Re:WTF? by AME · · Score: 1
      I think some would consider the first-posters to be inciteful, though not necessarily insightful.

      --
      "I have a good idea why it's hard to verify programs. They're usually wrong." --Manuel Blum, FOCS 94
  39. Open Source, the difference that you can feel. by Cplus · · Score: 2

    I may be wrong, and probably am, but this is going to be one of the first times that open-sourcing something affects everyone across the board, regardless of whether you are directly using the software or not it's going to save everyone some bucks. Sadly that's what sticks in peoples minds. I for one will be glad to not have to give any more coin to NSI, I really don't trust them as much after that whole email fiasco.

    --
    "Share your knowledge. It's a way to achieve immortality." -- Dalai Lama
    1. Re:Open Source, the difference that you can feel. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And all GPL's people said, "Amen!"

  40. A Cheap Way To Be A Registrar by Joel+Rowbottom · · Score: 3
    This looks very much to me like a quick cheap way to become a registrar without (a) paying NSI's $75 registration, or (b) without becoming a CORE registrar with all the bond and financial baggage which comes with it.

    I suspect a lot of people out there will be very happy with this, mostly the small-time 'Net companies who have a rack in Telehouse and deal with lots of smaller clients. Having said all that, I know of at least one project which is creating a not-for-profit registrar along the same lines as the UK's Nominet registry, doing it on a membership basis. It'll be interesting to see how it all develops in relation to this project.

    You mention "price war". If the "cost price" is $13, then I can see people doing domains at $13.01 - after all, with the sheer volume of domains registered it'll all add up just like call minutes do with UK dialup ISPs. The real benefactors of this are likely to be the ICANN/CORE registrars who do domains at $10 or so, who will swallow the glut of the business.

    It's a pity it still has to go through NSI after all that though. And the site itself is mostly "coming soon" messages :(

    BR,

    Joel.

    --
    Smegma.
  41. Smart first posters use Perl by BlueUnderwear · · Score: 1

    And moreover, if a first post appears at 2am, it doesn't mean that the first poster was awake. Only that his cronjobs ran on time, and duly noticed the new story.

    --
    Say no to software patents.
  42. Hurry, register your domains BEFORE this comes out by weave · · Score: 5
    There's a big downside to cheap registration services. At least at $70 a pop, it kind of tempers most people from going nuts. Now that we can see really cheap domain registrations, anything that makes sense will be gone in no time.

    Scumbags like mailbank.com have already registered over 10,000 surnames, just so they can sell mail aliases and web aliases back to people. Imagine, now they'll be able to afford to get every surname in the phone directory, if not already taken.

    All I know is, I'm damn glad I grabed *MY* surname already, cause after this is done, the only available domain names left with be crap like.

    • wqprjhqwmn.com
    • wxttvnmyttp.org
    • xzwscyoow.net
  43. Hey.. But .. I liked my .cx by SirStanley · · Score: 1

    Does this mean i can finally have a .com and rid myself of my .cx domains because this will actually be cheaper??? Why havent people done this before? Or have i missed something?

    --
    --------========+++Dont Feed The Lab Techs+++========--------
  44. Re:Hurry, register your domains BEFORE this comes by weave · · Score: 1
    Scumbags like mailbank.com have already registered over 10,000 surnames, just so they can sell mail aliases and web aliases back to people. Imagine, now they'll be able to afford to get every surname in the phone directory, if not already taken.

    Just thought of another great scam this open registration system will allow. A site like mailbank.com has a form where you type in your surname to see if it is available for getting a vanity domain name from them based on that surname. They search their database of 12,000 names and tell you if you can do it.

    Imagine now, their form can go further. If your name is Nigel Poncewattle and you enter poncewattle into their search box and they don't already have it registered and it's not already registered elsewhere, they can instantly register the domain poncewattle.com, then come back and say "Congratulations" and resell a piece of it to you (and others.)

    In my opinion, NSI should have been allowed to keep the three main TLDs and other registrars should have begun other TLDs so turds like me who wanted their surname as a domain name could have registered something more appropriate like weaverling.nom instead of weaverling.org

  45. So proud of TUCOWS by Alowishus · · Score: 1

    This is fantastic news! It makes my skin tingle to think how worried NSI should get over this and why. :^)

    This will also give service providers/web developers a better handle on "one-stop shopping" for their customers - go to ONE place and send ONE check to get a domain name and hosting, and not have to muck thru NSI's slow response times.

  46. Re:Irresponsible Price War Promotion by Gill+Bates · · Score: 1
    And now, to keep everyone happy; "Linux is GROOVY, /. is cool and I hate Gill Bates

    Hey! What did I ever do to you? I, for one, am not being kept happy with remarks like that.

  47. Even if it wasn't open source, this is huge. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Tucows is, in effect, giving the end-user the ability to register a domain name for $13. Imagine a huge company, say Disney, that needs to register a ton of domain names all the time. All they need to do is write their own client, stick it on an internal network (save for whatever communication the server does with Tucows) and they can register all the domain names they want, for free (ignoring the $13 on-the-top cost). This sort of technology is groundbreaking. I'm surprised ICANN and NSI are allowing this, as it doesn't only break up the monopoly, it shatters it. -M242

  48. API in C major by korpiq · · Score: 2

    The API documentation listed its functionary in C. Natural, but I'm going to make a command-line interface out of it - or one in Perl.

    I think I'll discourage my clients (eh, friends; who would I be fooling?^) of using .fi -domains even more now. That system just is not up to automatization.

    --

    I think, therefore thoughts exist. Ego is just an impression.
  49. Do I own my domain or am I just renting it? by smartin · · Score: 1

    If I don't pay the renewal on my domain name, I lose it right? The question is: Since, I got it from Network Solutions, am I forced to renew it there? Or can I renew it somewhere else cheaper. What exactly am I get from Network Solutions, I would guess that it's a refereal from their top level name servers. Can someone explain this, or point to some information on how the system works?

    --
    The difference between Canada and the USA is that in Canada healthcare is a right and gun ownership is a privilege.
  50. Irresponsible Price War Promotion by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2
    Price wars are good for the consumer, so the wisdom goes. Sure, if you are a so-called pennyless student, you win. Short term, everyone wins. Long term, everyone loses, heres why...

    As the profit margin goes down, the incentive to produce/maintain/whatever the commodity/service reduces to the point that:
    1. The existing players find something else to do, and
    2. New players decide that there is no point in entering a market with no money.

    Over the much longer term, when most people have left the market, the prices will rise and the cycle will repeat.

    Extending the obsession with OSS and 'Free' to everything else will result in a collapse of the current economic system. Yeah, right, there are going to be those that trot out the tired old argument that "the model is changing" and "this is the way of the future", but this has already been said in the old USSR and still is in Cuba.

    And now, to keep everyone happy; "Linux is GROOVY, /. is cool and I hate Gill Bates

  51. Re:My question... by mmerlin · · Score: 1

    http://www.2day.com will let you register a domain for free with NSI, then you have 2 or 3 months to pay NSi the $70 per domain. If your domains are available, go get 'em now!

    --

    smile, it makes everyone else wonder what you're up to :-)
  52. My question... by zizzer · · Score: 1

    If I want to register a domian name before Tucows gets all of this together what is the best/cheapest place to do it? I have two domains I want to register and don't have $140 bucks to drop on them just this minute.