Slashdot Mirror


Sci-Fi Channel Making Dune Miniseries

devphil writes "Variety is reporting that the Sci-Fi channel is producing a six-hour, three-part Dune miniseries to air next October. The Yahoo article is here." Mmmmm. Sure hope it's better than the Dune movie was.

27 of 127 comments (clear)

  1. Re:Long Version by aquitone · · Score: 2

    The version of Dune released in theaters was approximately two hours long. However, later they released a 3 hour version of the film which is called the "Alan Smithee" version because director David Lynch disassociated himself with it (Alan Smithee is sort of like "John Doe" or "Anonymous" for directors). I believe the miniseries uses the same footage as the 3 hour version of the movie.
    --
    tmk29@columbia.edu

  2. Movie Grew On Me... by cburley · · Score: 2
    ...which is hard to admit, seeing as everybody else says they hated it.

    I barely tolerated it at first, but seeing the longer cut a couple of times on TV gave me more appreciation for it vis-a-vis the book (which I love and have read many times).

    Can't remember the original version so well anymore, but it seemed as though some of my favorite scenes from the book weren't in it, but were in the long version.

    The long version also gave me much more appreciation for Kyle MacLachlan (sp?) in the lead role -- who I thought was a lousy choice at first.

    I even have the soundtrack, and enjoy most of that (despite not having heard anything else by Toto I thought was worth buying).

    So while a new series on Sci-Fi might be a great thing, I don't feel it'll automatically be better than the movie, especially given some of the other great aspects of the movie (e.g. some of the "lesser" roles -- gotta admit, it's a bit strange watching Patrick Stewart in Dune now compared to before his doing ST:TNG).

    Wish 'em all well, though, and might even tune in, since I can get Sci-Fi (though with some hassle, as it's scrambled, requiring me to actually use my cable box to tune it in instead of my VCR/TV setup...thank goodness for the convenient A/B switch I finally installed, mainly to watch MST3K).

    --
    Practice random senselessness and act kind of beautiful.
  3. Book 7 is out ... followed by DUNE7 by squireson · · Score: 2

    The seventh book in the Dune series is out in case anyone hadn't heard .

    It is called 'House Atreides' and is written by Brian Herbert ( Franks son ) and *mumblemumble* Anderson .

    It is a lighter read and is wonderful in that it shows some of the more prominent 'races' in their less developed stages . Bene Gesserit are still more or less Human in this prequel etc ...

    Highly recomended . Also there is a note in side the book that Dune7 will follow ( that is the title that Frank Herbert held for the sequel to Chapterhouse )
    Your Squire
    sqruireson

    1. Re:Book 7 is out ... followed by DUNE7 by padan · · Score: 2

      oh come on. I bought the book, and really didn't know what to expect. I had read some of that...guy...Anderson's SW books, and hadn't been too terribly dissapointed, but as this book being a prequel to the Dune legacy, I was just saddened. It really was not at all up to par, and I don't consider it part of the Dune series at all. padan

  4. you have some facts mixed up there. by tap · · Score: 2

    There are two versions of the DUNE movie. Well, really there are more, but just two important ones. There is a "short" one, like 2 and half hours, which was shown in theaters and is out on tape, and it credits David Lynch as director. There is a 3 hour version, which came out on TV and was reshown by the sci-fi channel recently, that has David Lynch's name removed and credits Alan Smithee.

    Several years before the David Lynch Dune, there was a plan to make a Dune movie. This is the one that had HR Giger and Salvador Dali for artwork and Pink Floyd for music. After Jodorowsky spent several million and had nothing to show for it, Hollywood canned it.

  5. I liked the movie. by rde · · Score: 2

    I saw the twenty-seven hour version that was only released in Burkino Faso. It was good, but there were a few things I didn't remember from the book, like the dwarf^H^H^H^H^H short person telling Stilgar in a dream that Paul was the One.

    I wouldn't mind seeing the miniseries; the first book was incredibly awesome, two could have been better and longer, and the rest... well, I didn't rush out to buy the latest sequel.
    It looks like Herbert Jr. is going to do a Christopher Tolkien; I look forward over the next decade to reading the secret writing of the Bene Gesserit Volume 8 : The origin of the Kwisatz Haderach myths.

  6. The book really helped. by Wayfarer · · Score: 3

    I hope the series gives out more background information than the movie. The greatest failing of the movie, in mine honest opinion, was that it attempted to achieve its atmosphere through whiz-bang special effects instead of through good storytelling. I found myself wondering "What's in the box?" and "Who exactly is Captain Picard/Sting playing again?" throughout the feature.

    Once I actually read the book, the movie was much more enjoyable, as I could finally sit back and watch it without wondering what everything meant. Here's hoping I won't need the book for the series!

    On an almost unrelated note, I've got this annoying feeling that our good friend Iain from "Star Wars" should be playing the Emperor instead of this Giannini guy--and not just because of the title! As Palpatine, he had almost exactly the character I'd expect for this role. 8)

    --

    -W-

    Is it all journey, or is there landfall?
    --Ellison & van Vogt, 'The Human Operators'

    1. Re:The book really helped. by Mentat21 · · Score: 2

      It seems that there would be a market for the long version on DVD. I've seen several people mention it and I know that I would buy it myself. I wonder if there's someplace we can write to tell them that it really would sell.

  7. Re:Random sighting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2

    Check out http://us.imdb.com/AlternateVersions?0087182 The third comment points out that the 6 hour version does not exist, since only about 5 hours of film was shot anyway, this is apparently confirmed by Frank Herbert himself in his intro to the book Eye.

  8. Weirding "modules"? by jcr · · Score: 2

    Give me a break. The movie sucked.

    The stillsuits looked like Batman and Robin rubber-fetish gear, and they had to tie the whole incoherent mess together with Irulan narrating the story.

    The stupidest thing of all, it *rained* at the end.

    This story is *always* going to suck if you try to cram it into two hours. A six-hour miniseries *might* do it justice.

    -jcr

    --
    The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
  9. Corrections regarding versions by XaOsGoth · · Score: 3
    There is a lot of talk about various lengths/versions of Dune, and I thought I'd clear the fog a bit. Here's what IMDB has to say about the various versions:
    Theatrical version is 140-minutes long; network TV version, disowned by director David Lynch, is 190 minutes long and features outtakes and additional footage. The TV print credits "Allen Smithee" as director. The theatrical release features a brief introductory narration spoken by the "princess". The TV version has a longer spoken introduction by a narrator, with still paintings and drawings used to bring the viewer up to speed on the story. The TV version (available on Japanese Laserdisc) lacks the blue color in the Fremen's eyes, indicating that the scenes were cut before special f/x were added. A third version of "Dune", seen on KTVU in San Francisco in 1992, is the only one that edits together footage from both the theatrical and TV versions, putting back the violent scenes (such as the "heart sucking sequence") and theatrical versions of some scenes (such as Paul and Jessica running from a thumper). Also, Lynch's name is restored at the end (watch for the "Assistant to Mr. Lynch" credit). Contrary to popular rumors, no 6-hours long director's cut, ever existed. The only "director's cut" of the film was the one shown theatrically; Lynch never had a hand in any other version of Dune. Lynch's original intention was for Dune to have been about 3+ hours long. To that end, about 5 hours was shot. This is also confirmed by author 'Frank Herbert' (qv) wrote in the introduction to the book "Eye". It would be impossible for a 6-hour version to exist and even a 5-hour Dune would mean the inclusion of many scenes never intended for the final version (for reasons of redundancy, etc.). It is only necessary to read any of the final scripts for the film to realize that there was never any intention of making Dune more than 4 hours in length at the very most: the script for anything more just was never there. There are two theatrical versions available in Europe, the only two differences between being the short scene in which the Navigator can be seen "at work" folding space; and a very short clip showing the cheek of Duke Leto torn open.
    This information may be found at http://us.imdb.com/AlternateVersions?0087182. I own a copy of one of these versions, and based on the description and my memory, it is version 2 above. (There are some scenes missing in my version from the theatrical version, but it includes a narrator and still paintings as illustrations for an intro).
  10. I hope it's better than the BOOKS! by wowbagger · · Score: 3
    I found the Dune books to be much like a rollercoaster: It started out up, and was pretty much downhill from there.

    The problem that I have with the Dune series is that Frank Herbert didn't fully follow the implications of his world. He wanted a feudalistic society, but with modern "stuff".
    • He wanted knife fights, so he has to develop shields. But shields prevent seige engines from attacking your castles, so he had to come up with the lasegun/shield interaction to prevent shields from being used to protect large emplacements. But then he had to make the lasegun explode too, or else you could cap your enemy from a distance.
    • A feudalistic society cannot exists with a modern information processing infrastructure, so he creates the Mentats and outlaws computers. However, a computer has so many advantages over a Mentat that somebody is going to break the rules to get the advantage.
    • He wanted witches, so he creates the Bene Geserit. However, if they can develop the mental powers they have, so could anyone else.
    • If everybody had access to space, you could just drop large rocks on your enemies. So, he places space travel in the hands of the Guild. However, if the guild is not held in check, they rule. So, the spice dependancy. Question: if spice is needed for space travel, how did we get to Arakis in the first place?

    Unlike guys like Larry Niven, Jerry Pournelle, Robert Heinlein, et. al. who come up with a world, then go back an make sure it hangs together, Frank Herbert makes these hodge-podge worlds that would fall apart at the slightest disruption.


    Sorry, I'm not inpressed.
    1. Re:I hope it's better than the BOOKS! by CrosseyedPainless · · Score: 4

      Knife fights/shields/lasguns: There are ways around all the pseudotechnological difficulties he throws up. I think he was just adding a little flavor. Nothing to get bent about.

      Mentants v computers: mentants have advantages over computers, too. And, the Ixians are forever breaking the rules and getting slapped for it.

      Bene Gesserit witches: It's expressly stated that the Bene Gesserit "powers" are the results of training and psychoactive drugs. Sure, anyone could develop those powers; anyone who wanted to duplicate Bene Gesserit training. Man, that objection is really dumb. That's like saying karate blackbelts are unlikely, because, like, anyone could learn to do that stuff.

      And finally, Answer: I don't have the books handy for quotechecks, but it goes something like this: "There are other poisions Guild Navigators can use to work their tricks, but once they use melange, there's no turning back."

    2. Re:I hope it's better than the BOOKS! by coyote-san · · Score: 3

      You are missing the bigger picture here. The first few _Dune_ books are set in a world which is deliberately static to prevent a return to a period of human enslavement by machines. (The latter books show the consequences of the God Emperor and subsequent scattering.) Anyone who attempts to get an edge based on technology will be universally resented (Ix), with the people who manipulate the body (Bene T.) and mind (Bene Gesserit) not far behind. Such a society *will* reach a point where force and response are exactly matched.

      As for some of your specific points, the Guild controls interstellar travel but each major house is fully capable of "dropping rocks" on its enemy. Remember that the Atreides family nukes were stored on one of the moons. If they drop rocks, it was because of the same social pressures not to use nukes against a population.

      Also, I recall seeing nothing that said that a "lasgun" had any correlation to lasers. In fact, _Chapterhouse Dune_ has some comments from Idaho which clearly stated that lasguns and shields are both products of Hoffman's equation and that the "feedback" described in the first book falls out of these equations. No doubt you would immediately object that Idaho admits that nobody really understands those equations and hence it's inconsistent to claim that they're understood well enough to produce lasguns and shields. :-)

      --
      For every complex problem there is an answer that is clear, simple, and wrong. -- H L Mencken
    3. Re:I hope it's better than the BOOKS! by H3lldr0p · · Score: 4

      You're missing the whole point to what Herbert was talking about in the first place. Dune was never meant IMHO to be the Sci-Fi people believe it to be. For any careful reader it is more of an analysis of what Government really is and where Governments have room to move in.
      I ended up reading all 6 books in one 3 month streach a few years ago, and for the most part I never once was aware of Herbert trying to push any technological view of anything. He really goes out of his way to keep technology as far out of the turning points of his stories as one could possibly write. Hence, I believe the problems you have with the stories themselves. These are stories that are suppose to be about ruling a large population, and the reactions that people ruling have.
      If you have the time and paitence, re-read the books, but do so with a different mindset. Read them instead in the same way as you would read The Prince. Read it in the same way as you would watch Citizen Kane. This is what the stories are really about. Not Sci-Fi.

    4. Re:I hope it's better than the BOOKS! by TeknoDragon · · Score: 3

      If everybody had access to space, you could just drop large rocks on your enemies. So, he places space travel in the hands of the Guild. However, if the guild is not held in check, they rule. So, the spice dependancy. Question: if spice is needed for space travel, how did we get to Arakis in the first place?

      well, I really liked the books (say 1,2,5,6 -- 3 was a snooze and 4 was halfway to a romance novel)

      but I believe the answer to your question is in the "Dune Encyclopedia" (wish I had one)... apparently there is some alternative to guild navigator travel, performed by computers/robots (i think) the only problem is the machine revolution and something about the computers/robots not doing exactly what they were supposed to (going too fast i think?)

      of course it's been a long time since I read this... so you should go check it out yourself

      I think that they should make more dune movies... someone should get Lynch on the phone (did I mention his nephew goes to WSU -- CE major and a good friend -- ahh bask bask bask)

      condense 2 and 3, leave out 4 -- taking a few years break, and do and release 5 and 6 within a few months of each other... I'd go! damn, I'd buy the DVD...

    5. Re:I hope it's better than the BOOKS! by Juxtap0ser · · Score: 2
      Exactly!!

      Dune is about Government, Environmentalism, Religion, and Sociology, and how those interact when ruling extremely large populations.

      Its also about human evolution and potential (looks at the Duncan Idaho in the last 2 books, who also IMHO is the main character of the entire series, he's the only one in all the books, re-reading the series with that perspective changes things hugely).

      Also, Leto II made his decision to forestall a Berserker (a la Fred Saberhagen) type ending to humanity, at the largest scales the series is about Species Survival, period (the potential for this happening the first time was short-circuited by the Butlerian Jihad, the second by Leto's Peace and the subsequent Scattering).

      Remember, mechanical FTL space travel WAS available pre-Butlerian Jihad, and again in the No-Ships of the last 2 books, the Guild and Spice were just how it was done in the middle periods.

      The Empire was the Empire of a Million Worlds before the Scattering, and this was considered by Leto's visions to be too few baskets for humanities eggs to be in! at least when faced with the threat of Machine Intelligence Beserkers inimical to biological life.

      Well, enough rambling, I could go on all day about this stuff (read all 6 books at least 5 times each over the last 12 years, and they are vastly different each time, like Gurdjieff [sp?] Herbert sometimes reworked sentences to cram in up to seven differnt levels of meaning...I guarantee that whatever you think of Dune, more is lurking under the surface! :-)

      --
      From his paradise no one shall ever evict us. --David Hilbert, defending Cantor's set theory
  11. Re:Long Version by padan · · Score: 2

    Well, to begin with we have the original Lynch production that was shown in the theaters (as a side note, Lynch was offered to direct Return of the Jedi, but passed in order to do Dune), and was released as both letterbox and regular cuts. This is the version that is narrated by Princess Irulan. There are two more versions, one that started as a director's cut, but which Lynch disavowed all influence with, and the intro is with paintings and a male narrator. The third version is one that you will probably won't be able to find, as a station in Cal. pieced together segments of the two previous versions into one movie. This is not available commercially. A good url to use to find specifics about these is http://members.aol.com/hiphats/arrakis1.html hope this helps, padan

  12. Miniseries Format by the+eric+conspiracy · · Score: 3

    One thing that is good is that the miniseries format is far more suitable for a novel of this scope than is a film. There have been several miniseries based on novels that have worked out very well, the ones that immediately stick in my mind are 'I, Claudius', based on the novels by Robert Graves, and of course the magnificent 'Smiley's People' starring Sir Alec Guiness, based on the John LeCarre novel of the same name.

    I know it is a bit much to expect that Dune will be done at the same level (I think that these two miniseries are the best things ever shown on television) - I am especially concerned that three two hour segments is not enough. But it could easily be better than the movie.

    By the way, I first read Dune in the original form published in the old large format Analog magazine when I was in my late teens. The Dune illustrations in Analog by John Schoenherr are still by far the best IMHO. Analog of that era was generally awesome, too.

  13. movie terribly flawed, but so close in some ways.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2

    W/o the stupid weirding modules and 80's induced editing of most of the drug references and implications (amazing that you can watch the whole film and never be hit in the head that this is a DRUG movie) this film would have worked - also minus the lame voice over. What I would have done (unheard of in the 80's) would be to make a 45 minute pre movie or long trailer explaining the background and hyping the movie at the same time. This could have avoided a hell of a lot of plot mangling and lame dialog. Visually the film was 80% on target except largely for the comical and totally laughable Harkonnens...more faults come to mind, maybe the movie did suck... I fully expect the SCIFI network to make an even worse film, their track record is low budget cheesy space opera crap...this is a book (like Cronenberg's lamentable adaptations - hey maybe HE should have stepped in for Lynch in '83!) that is never going to make a successful filmic translation. It should be left alone, truely excellent science fiction (and there's not much of it on the level of 'Dune' - Delaney is one of the few others who transcend genre to such a degree...) is far to intelelctually rich to escape Hollywood's inevitable Buck-Rogerization/Lucasification (Star Wars - what utter excrement!) http://www.linuxstart.com/~prion

  14. I for one loved it by TheBashar · · Score: 2

    DUNE as you may or may not know is not only a movie, and a book, but a six book series that Frank Herbert wrote. The series is absolutely fantastic. Yeah, books 3 and 4 are kinda slow but 1,2,5 & 6 make up for it.

    Anyway, what I'm trying to say is Herbert wrote an awesome world and a fantastic story around the planet Dune. I understand Dune the movie got a lot of complaints from movie goers, but that is probably because they couldn't appreciate the wonderful world Herbert had created.

    It is a clear case of one of those movies - to really convey the wonder of the story - would have to be 4-5 hours long. But audiences don't sit for that long so Lynch had to do the best he could in the limited screen time. If I had never read the book I would probably think it sucked too.

    As it is, I read the book, and I think the movie is a fantastic visualization of the main parts of one of the most fantastic epic Sci-Fi stories ever written.

    -- Long live the fighters!

    BTW: Anybody realize that my pseudonym is a Dune reference? (Just not book 1).

  15. Nope by Anonymous+Shepherd · · Score: 2

    The only ones who *ever* copied the BG powers was Paul, Alia, and Leto.

    Essentially the BG had developed an advanced yoga/chi physiological training for the human body, as well as tapping into 'spiritual' psychological threads of the human psyche.

    They had tremendous control over themselves, and because they knew the human body and psyche so well, had tremendous control over others.

    With the help of spice, they also had prescient powers.

    The Honored Matres, if I recall correctly, had, by and large, some degree of physical control over their own bodies, but without access to the spice, had no prescience and did not have the true ability of controlling others through Voice.

    They did have drugs, of course, but they had little in the way of powers compared to the BG or any of the KHs.


    -AS

    --

    -AS
    *Pikachu*
  16. Re:The Wierding Way by Mentat21 · · Score: 2

    I don't remember any "sound" module stuff in the books. I think that you must be confused. The Weirding Way was the Bene Gesserit method of fighting. It involved having very finely tuned reflexes and staying at the edge of readiness.

  17. Re:To bad its not David Lynch's 6 hour movie "DUNE by Skinwalker · · Score: 2

    You can read about Jodorowsky's Dune here: http://www.hotweird.com/jodorowsky/dune.html There is some fascinating concept art from HR Giger, as well as an incoherent ramble by Jodorowski. If I remember correctly, Herbert and Jodorowski had serious disagreements over the script... I think Jodorowsky wanted Duke Leto to be castrated onscreen, or some such nonsense. Ridley Scott (see Alien, Bladerunner) was also considered for the director's chair, and would have likely been the best choice for it, considering the alternatives.

  18. Re:MENTATS! by Mentat21 · · Score: 2

    It is by will alone I set my mind in motion, it is by the juice of sapho the thoughts aquire speed, the lips aquire stains, the stains become a warning, it is by will alone I set my mind in motion.

  19. Re:MENTATS! by Mentat21 · · Score: 2

    My bad, previous is wrong quote, I don't have my Dune DVD right now to check either. Sorry.

  20. Herbert's take on the movie (and mine) by Lumpish+Scholar · · Score: 2

    I was at a science fiction convention a few months before DUNE (the Lynch movie) premiered. Frank Herbert was one of the speakers. He said, "It begins the same as the book, and it ends the same as the book, and I think that's about all an author can ask for."

    We in the audience had no idea how desperate Herbert must have been (at the time) to say something nice about the movie.

    My wife summed it up best: Herbert's novel was all about political struggle and environmentalism. Lynch made an action film.

    A friend of mine (Mark Leeper) enjoyed the film for providing illustrations of several scenes from the novel. Another friend of mine had a shorter, harsher review: "Yuchh, blech!"

    --
    Stupid job ads, weird spam, occasional insight at