Slashdot Mirror


Mars Polar Lander Lands Today

Quite a number of people have written, including the Webmaster of the Mars Polar Lander Site to let us know that it will be touching down at ~12:14 PST. The website will have also have a Downlink from the Lander itself which is incredibly cool. Check out their site - but also check out the technical document about the web site. Very interesting read for those of you who want to know about setting up a powerful web site. The web site is using a huge amount of Open Source software - Apache, Perl, PHP, Linux, MySQL and other software as well.

95 comments

  1. Slashdot types by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    It's funny that there is a SPACESHIP landing on another planet millions of miles away with the potential to make interesting and possibly incredible scientific discoveries, and you guys (or a significant number of you) are interested in the server software running on the machine with pictures on the internet back on earth.

    I'm not saying it's bad...but C'MON!!!

  2. What a strange configuration! by jquiroga · · Score: 1

    Images will make up a significant proportion of the data and during busy periods it is estimated that one 256 bit x 256 bit image could be received by UCLA every minute.

    65.536 bits/minute -> 94.371.840 bits/day -> 82.575.360 bytes/week

    In 4 Gbytes of RAM there are 4.294.967.296 bytes =~ 52 weeks of images (1 year)

    Each of the origin servers uses dual Pentium II 450 CPUs. They are equipped with 512MB RAM and approximately 20GB of internal storage. An external RAID5 system provides an additional 50GB of storage.

    That storage would be nice to store the Apache logs, but it seems unnecessary, the images aren't bulky (4 Gb/year). However, they would not keep a year of images in memory, for speed.

    Exactly, what are we supposed to learn about this configuration? It doesn't make sense to me.

  3. Re:Is this a hole? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    sure. but have you tried connecting to www-origin.marspolarlander.com lately?

  4. Re:what I want out of this mission by jonesvery · · Score: 1

    Another mic question:

    As I was waking up this morning, I *think* that my radio told me that the first sounds from the probe would be the voices of MS engineers -- they did a test (here on earth) and then didn't delete.

    Anyone else hear this, or was I dreaming?

    --

    * * *
    It is a dada story -- it has no moral.

  5. Re:Spy sats- way too big and expensive by edremy · · Score: 2
    Nice idea, but not feasible. You'd need to get a direct transmission model, not a bucket-dropper(Direct film return), i.e., post KH-9. These are big machines- Hubble+ sized. There's just no way at all you could move one to Mars orbit with current boosters. Add to that they aren't cheap- the budget for space surveillence is rather high, and each satellite is mucho expensive.

    Eric

    --
    "Seven Deadly Sins? I thought it was a to-do list!"
  6. Viruses on Mars! (was Re:Mars 'Net Threatened) by Rick_T · · Score: 2

    From the article:
    | ``We put all the sequences together and
    | basically we send the arm's sequence machine an
    | e-mail with an attachment. So it gets the
    | e-mail and it says, ``OK, I'll move over here
    | and I'll dig a trench,'' Slostad said.

    Didn't anyone tell NASA to never just blindly open an e-mail attachment? Next thing you know, the lander will be emailing one of the Voyager probles, instructing it to send the latest make.money.fast scheme to the first intelligent life it encounters.

    This will be, of course, the REAL reason aliens attack, hell bent on destroying the Earth.

    And all because some poor robotic arm on Mars opened an e-mail attachment. The lesson: DON'T DO IT!

    ;)

    --
    -- Rick
  7. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 2

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  8. Re:Is it overly complicated? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Yes but most people who dont live in the great USofA dont give a shit what LA's GMT offset is. Do you know what the GMT offset of Adelaide (hint Australia) is?

    +9:30? (I'm guessing.)

  9. Slashdotted by heroine · · Score: 2

    3:00pm ET. So much for that web server.

  10. Windows CE running Polar Lander by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If it turns out that this mission's failure was due to its internal Windows CE operating system, it could be the finally nail on the coffin for Microsoft's attempt at getting people behind this OS.

  11. 2:09 CST, site is down by David+Ishee · · Score: 1

    I guess it couldn't handle it. At 2:09pm CST, it was hosed, can't connect, or get a recursive page that says "Document has moved here" with "here" being a link to itself.

    --
    Your password has expired, please login to change it.
  12. Re:Yes True, but the images are not all they dload by jquiroga · · Score: 1

    You are right. However, they say that images would make up a significant proportion of the data, and lacking more information, that's what I could say.

    Oh, never mind.

  13. One alternate site for the coverage - live! by yule · · Score: 3

    If the main site is /.ed, try http://www.marsportal.com. They (we) have images and several live cameras from inside mission control at UCLA.

    (Disclaimer - Yes, I am indirectly related to this site.)

    -shane

    1. Re:One alternate site for the coverage - live! by Artie+FM · · Score: 1

      What software are you using?

      --
      Be insightful. If you can't be insightful, be informative.
      If you can't be informative, use my name
  14. Re:Is it overly complicated? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    zulu time would seem to be the best option.... works for us aviators =p aux

  15. I don't know about you... by Anti-Sean · · Score: 1

    but I smell some new desktop background images once this probe starts transmitting!

  16. Image format by marcus · · Score: 2

    And I doubt that the images are 256x256x1 as per your calculations...x8, x16, anybody know?

    --
    Good judgement comes from experience, and experience comes from bad judgement.
    - W. Wriston, former Citibank CEO
    1. Re:Image format by jquiroga · · Score: 1

      Well, they could be grayscale (8 bit/pixel), but I did not calculate the pixel depth, they said that:

      ... it is estimated that one 256 bit x 256 bit image could be received by UCLA every minute. ...

      Perhaps they meant pixels, who knows.

  17. Re:Replace NASA... Open it or something... by wizbit · · Score: 2
    Oh, terrific idea. Down with NASA. Their only field of technological advancement of any importance is space, right? I mean, jeez, they've had thirty whole years to get past the moon and all they can manage to do is launch unsuccessful missions hundreds of thousands of miles further away?

    Are our standards just a *bit* high? Space should be a now thing? Get a grip. Tons of people would be happy to tell you that science fiction is an important part of scientific advance, but it's still science fucking fiction. These people are limited by (gasp!) laws of physics and current-day propulsion techniques.

    Fucking stupidity. Fucking stupidity everywhere. I hate it.
    -- Ozone Pilot
  18. Re:Long-comment bonus by -C-O-W- · · Score: 1

    Ah
    - c o w

  19. Re:FYI: BSD/OS, not Linux by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Try www.netcraft.com and see what it tells you.... BSD/OS.

    -T

  20. Re:Replace NASA... Open it or something... by dalroth5 · · Score: 1

    Q: If university graduates can't express themselves in their native tongue, what are the chances they can:
    (a) tell the difference between units of measurement; or
    (b) wire a plug without leaving conductors exposed; or
    (c) operate a parachute by remote control?

    --
    "We reject kings, presidents and voting. We believe in rough consensus and running code." Dave Clark, IETF
  21. what day is it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is today some holliday or something I didnt know about? I mean look at all the lamers posting today, shouldn't they be in school?

  22. Metric south pole or Imperial south pole? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    [Yes, I'm a cruel bastard...]

  23. Re:works fine for me by PGillingwater · · Score: 1

    Nothing wrong with my connection. I can post on Slashdot (the definitive statement for being well-connected in this modern world) and can traceroute quite happily to the Mars Lander site. I suspect there's something unusual happening with the funky load balancing/Caching/DNS magic described in the technical document. I'm sure I won't be the only person experiencing problems reaching the site -- and yes, I did try several times. :-)
    --
    Paul Gillingwater

    --
    Paul Gillingwater
    MBA, CISSP, CISM
  24. Re:what I want out of this mission by Wyatt+Earp · · Score: 1

    Yep. heard it on NPR. The mic is on a Russian science package and I guess after it was launched someone remembered that they didn't clear the memory chip for the mic so there is probly the voices of the guys doing a sound check.

    For some reason I have an image of Tom Hanks dressed as an Aerosmith roadie doing mic checks on SNL's Wayne's World.

  25. HAHAHAHA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    that was not funny

    hehe j/k.. it gave me a giggle =)

    (Score:-1, Redundant)

  26. Suicide Solution? by Mignon · · Score: 0
    Quite a number of people have written, including the Webmaster

    Were his last words after doing this "I put my faith in God"?

    (That's an EgyptAir reference...)

  27. Re:Is it overly complicated? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    >I know my GMT offset, even though I don't live in Europe.

    Yes but most people who dont live in the great USofA dont give a shit what LA's GMT offset is. Do you know what the GMT offset of Adelaide (hint Australia) is ?

  28. Post on slashdot in GMT, its the global standard. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I come from EST and didn't know for sure what PST's offset is, I mean I don't keep track of all the time zones in the world. I mean any one outside EST has a legitimate reason to not know it. I think it is a valid to request (my request) that times be posted in GMT since that actually means something to most of the world. Contrary to popular belief North America is the centre of the universe and people are allowed to not know details about it.



  29. Let's just hope that... by marcus · · Score: 2

    the probe didn't crash along with the servers.

    They've been hosed since about 1.30 CST.

    --
    Good judgement comes from experience, and experience comes from bad judgement.
    - W. Wriston, former Citibank CEO
  30. What would be even cooler.... by cruise · · Score: 1

    If I were an shy ET type, this would be the perfect opportunity to make yourself known to the world in a non-threatening sort of way.

    The first image comes down and it's... it's.... OH MY GOD! It's Ray Walston!

    (for those of you that don't know.. this was the guy in My Favorite Martian)

  31. broadcast.com STINKS! by TrevorB · · Score: 1

    broadcast.com was supposed to offer a 300K Windows Media Player stream. They can't even keep their 28.8 streams running at full speed. They stopped working for me at 11AM PST...

    Hmm, no contact at first attempt. 10 minutes past. Hopefully something just went into safemode.

  32. They've lost it?????!!!!! by jw3 · · Score: 2
    I'm watching the discovery channel right now - am I completly wrong and don't understand plain English, or did they lost this spacecraft as well? Nooooo!

    It ruins my day.

    Regards,

    January

    1. Re:They've lost it?????!!!!! by Thaddeus · · Score: 2

      It doesn't sound at all like they've lost it... from what they're saying (I'm watching it on Link TV here at NASA) they expected something like this to happen. The 12:39 time was just the first window they had, and something has probably triggered it to go into safe mode. It might even be a few days before they get anything... or it might be a few minutes from now...

      --
      ^X^S ^X^C
    2. Re:They've lost it?????!!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Has there been any transmission from either Amundson or Scott?

  33. The News is Not Good by CaptainCarrot · · Score: 1

    As of this writing, the first signals from the Martian Lander were supposed to have been received about 35 minutes ago. So far they have been unable to detect any. JPL is saying that there is no reason for extreme pessimism just yet. There are a number of possibilities as to the cause, and some of them are correctable.

    --
    And the brethren went away edified.
    1. Re:The News is Not Good by Snags · · Score: 2

      They're going to try again a little before
      5PM EST (2200UTC). They say they think it
      went into safe mode upon landing, or that
      the antenna wasn't pointed in quite the right
      direction.

      --
      main(O){10<putchar((O--,102-((O&4)*16| (31&60>>5*(O&3)))))&&main(2+ O);}
      LN2 is cool!
    2. Re:The News is Not Good by Knara · · Score: 2

      It's actually more properly "the news is less than perfect". I mean, you're landing this little thing on another planet. The chances of everything working exactly like planned the first time around is pretty small. It'll work. Trust me >:D

    3. Re:The News is Not Good by CaptainCarrot · · Score: 1

      I work on a space program that earlier this year suffered the most expensive unmanned space accident in history, on a relatively routine insertion into a geosynchronous orbit. I no longer harbor high expectations for this kind of thing.

      --
      And the brethren went away edified.
    4. Re:The News is Not Good by Pathetic+Coward · · Score: 2

      We keep sending probes, and the Martians keep shooting them down ...

    5. Re:The News is Not Good by jms · · Score: 2

      See ... their SDI system works ...

  34. Forget it, requires Windoze Media Player by marcus · · Score: 2

    that's all

    --
    Good judgement comes from experience, and experience comes from bad judgement.
    - W. Wriston, former Citibank CEO
  35. CBC (16:20EST) and SGI urls. by Tekmage · · Score: 1
    --
    --The more you know, the less you know.
  36. Re:Mars 'Net Threatened By First Interstellar Back by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What does your link have to do with AT&T?

  37. comforting thought by RoLlEr_CoAsTeR · · Score: 1

    this coming sometime after.. those reports of one of the last missions crashing b/c of conversion problems between American & metric

    --

    Insert mind here.
  38. I was one of the many to submit this... by legoboy · · Score: 4

    You can also watch a NASA tv feed at broadcast.com. The have a 300k stream, which is cool. (MediaPlayer format, though)

    Here's the broadcast.com link: http://www.broadcast.com/events/n asa/marslanding/

    ------

    --
    If a tree falls on an anonymous coward yelling 'first post' in the forest, does anybody hear?
    1. Re:I was one of the many to submit this... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe it's in Mediaplayer format because OSS can't develop anything to compete? They're using Apache for the web server so they obviously aren't married to Microsoft but still chose the superior streaming video, to bad no one has made a Linux viewer for it.

  39. it will be on discovery channel, live! by Frederic54 · · Score: 3

    i think it starts at 3:30pm, and first picture will come at 4pm, on Discovery Channel
    --
    http://www.beroute.tzo.com

    --
    "Science will win because it works." - Stephen Hawking
    1. Re:it will be on discovery channel, live! by Frederic54 · · Score: 1

      it's 3:30pm and 4pm Eastern Time (Québec), anyway check your TV listings for Discovery Channel, i think it's only in North America and Canada?
      --
      http://www.beroute.tzo.com

      --
      "Science will win because it works." - Stephen Hawking
  40. Some people on the internet do not live in the USA by Johan+Veenstra · · Score: 1

    Why is this post moderated to 0?

    It can be very annoying to readers in outside the US that times are noted in PST, EST, CST and I don't know what. Why use all those standards (which are in fact local standards to you guys in America) on a global medium like the internet?

  41. PST by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Does anyone know what time this is for other parts of the world? I am sure people would find this useful! Someone must be running a world time clock on their desktop who can quickly post times around the world that correlate to 12.00 PST?

    1. Re:PST by joe52 · · Score: 2

      Someone must be running a world time clock on their desktop who can quickly post times around the world that correlate to 12.00 PST?

      Here's a web site that does time conversions:
      http://www.timeanddate.com/wor ldclock/fixedform.html

      Here is a link to times around the world at noon today, PST

      joe

  42. fingers crossed by freq · · Score: 1

    the last failed mission was not a problem with conversions. the martians are just tired of our noisy little probes. we had to send this one all the way to the south pole so they would leave us alone.

    the metric system is another conspiracy entirely...


    --
    "Tension is the great integrity" -- R. Buckminster Fuller
  43. one more funny, then I'll go home. by Evil+Poot+Cat · · Score: 0

    Given the nature of the mission, would this be the Day the Cherry gets Popped?

  44. Powerfull Site? ... Bad HTML by karrde · · Score: 0
    Why is it that sites can't seem to specify a text color when they specify a background color.

    I have my default colors set to white/black, so when a site like that specifies a white background I "see" white text on a white background.

    It's really a simple thing here folks, TEXT="BLACK", how hard is that.

  45. From a tech standpoint by BlueLines · · Score: 2

    The setup is _sweet_...however, I'm wondering how many people caught the os (Solaris x86) that they were using. As beautiful/wonderful/powerful as Linux/(Free||Open||Net)BSD are, and even in the presence of such popular and generally spiffy open source software, solaris is still rock solid. i disliked alot of things about solaris on x86 (in comparison to the sparc version), but stability was never one of them....and i'm surprised not to see more similar setups like this (commercial OS + tons of open source software==very nice).

    --
    --BlueLines "The cost of living hasn't affected it's popularity." -anonymous
    1. Re:From a tech standpoint by igjeff · · Score: 1

      Yeah...I noticed the OS being used...

      It seems that if you're going to use Solaris, give it the good hardware (Sparc) that its really designed to run on.

      If you're going to use x86, I'd go (being a Linux user myself) with one of the Open Source BSD's...

      I'm definitely not a fan of Solaris on x86.

      Another thing I noticed is that they're using Apache's reverse proxy and rewriting modules to front end the actual web servers actually hosting the content...I don't have much experience with this, but wouldn't squid accomplish the same thing with less overhead and higher performance (and more clusterability)?

      I know we've been fairly whelmed with Apache's reverse proxy'ing and rewriting...its not bad, but you're dealing with a lot of overhead (particularly memory consumption) by using Apache that could be avoided with squid.

      *shrug* Just a couple of thoughts.

      Jeff

    2. Re:From a tech standpoint by lazlo · · Score: 1
      Well, I'm sort of interested in this... From NetCraft, it seems that static and products .mars.ucla.edu are running apache on solaris (as the article says), however www.marspolarlander.com shows up as apache on BSD/OS. The article dosen't say what the NetCache servers are running, but it seems that it may be a BSD derivative.

      Notice that the article wasn't a post from the webmaster, but from the NetApp company (which makes sense, it's good press for them and their product).

      I also note that, contrary to the original post, they don't mention Linux anywhere.

      I do question their choice of OS though. I love Solaris, but everyone I know who has run Solaris x86 has been disappointed by it. For sheer processing horsepower, and the ability to move a lot of data across a system bus, you just can't beat a SPARC. (although, there was mention of a linux port to the S/390, that might do it...)

      But anyway, my overall impression of the setup is: Rox!

      --
      Pound! Bang! Bin! Bash! is this a shell script or a Batman comic?
  46. PST == GMT -0800 by Evil+Poot+Cat · · Score: 1

    At least in my part of the US, which may explain that peculiar tic some people have around here. :)

    This could be a Big Day, as long as we don't puncture the Red Planet's fragile membrane and cause it to deflate. ;)

  47. Solaris x86 by Ex+Machina · · Score: 2

    They're actually using Solaris x86 which I've heard isn't as stable as Solaris SPARC.
    Excellent setup, but I'd like to know if there's a way to make my Apache send a cached php page depending on cookie data.

  48. discovery coverage by bfk · · Score: 2
    For those folks without who aren't running Windows and don't have a T1, Discovery will start coverage at 11 AM PST, 2 PM EST.

    see http://www.dis covery.com/indep/newsfeatures/marspolar/marspolar. html for more.

    The big question: will anybody have better coverage?

  49. well...we will see something that we will NOT... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    expect. Mars isn't really devoid of life..

  50. Some random thoughts by jd · · Score: 3
    If it's on NASA Select, then it'll also be multicast =at full TV quality=. Throw that old RealAudio player out the window, install VIC, RAT and SDR, and enjoy a decent transmission, for a change! (* Assuming your ISP supports multicasting, or you can get a multicast tunnel set up *)

    A live downlink, eh? Just add an uplink, next time, and patch in Luner Lander...

    Whatever the guys at NASA do, =DON'T SNEEZE!= At least, not until the probe lands. Nobody really believes in that metric/imperial problem, with the last probe. We all know it's cos there was a flour fight in the control room, and nobody could tell which switch was which.

    The webmaster of NASA -told- Slashdot about this? I hope, for their sakes, they've laid in some extra lines of that 2 terabit fibre...

    --
    It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
  51. What's the point? by Redgie · · Score: 1

    We keep sending them up, and they keep shooting them down...

    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
    Artificial intelligence or natural stupidity?

    --

    Artificial intelligence or natural stupidity?
    Guess which wrote this...
  52. Baffled Once Again by grahams · · Score: 1

    Forget the fact that this mission is going to land on the freaking polar icecaps of Mars to look for water (as opposed to CO2/Dry Ice). And who cares about the meteorlogical research. But they use OSS!!!!! Oh my god, please let us know about that!

    Funny, this /. article mentions that they use many OSS technologies, such as Linux. I didn't see Linux mentioned *ANYWHERE* in that document....

  53. FYI: BSD/OS, not Linux by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    They are using BSD/OS.

    -T

    1. Re:FYI: BSD/OS, not Linux by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It states quite clearly they are using Slowaris/86.

  54. Is this a hole? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I only have read (so far) the first part of the technical document on how the web site works, but if I understand what I just read, it looks like their acceleration scheme would fall apart if everyone started trying to access www-origin.marspolarlander.com. Did I miss something?

  55. Re:works fine for me by the+eric+conspiracy · · Score: 2

    More than 3 billion Web hits per day and 300 million page requests per day against up to 2 terabytes of data" and wasn't even using the W2K Advanced Datacenter Server.

    That is a very large assumption considering we have no idea what the load is or where the bottleneck is. Given the experience of the Pathfinder (which crushed all previous load records two years ago) this could be in fact exceeding the 300 million page load/day rate, and with a much higher image load than shown in the Unisys demo.

    You can have a datacenter with 100 trillion page load per day capacity be useless if your backbone provider can't handle the load. As the Chicago Mercantile Exchange found out.

    By the way, did you ask youself exactly WHY the Advanced Datacenter Server wasn't used by Unisys? Or why they needed over 100 CPUs for this 'proof of concept'? What the hell is the manageability of that many servers, anyway?

  56. Informationless Noise by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I am so glad we have the Internet. If I had to rely on the "correspondent" who's job it is to filter "technical" content from the guests by interrupting them in mid-sentence for information, I'd be practically ignorant about the space program.

    They always interrupt the same way, too:

    Guest: "You see, if the antenna is aligned at more than 10 degrees, then the transmission frequency might..."

    Correspondent: "Uh, Uh, Uh, Uh, Uhhhhhhhhhhhhh, I think, um, I think I want to ask a question of our other guest, here, uhhhh, why don't we just land on Venus instead?"

    ...and then everyone at the network breathes a sigh of relief as the informationless noise resumes, for about 10 seconds, then they go to commercial.

    By the way, the Venus question is based on a real question heard just today on a "popular" network. "Why don't we just colonize Venus?" "Well, Bob, forgetting that the temperature is about 800 degrees, the wind is blowing at 200mph, and the atmosphere is poisonous, I really can't say."

    Oh, and the "correspondent" got the coordinates of the landing site backwards, placing the lander at the Martian north pole instead of south. Then he made the priceless statement: "Well, those numbers probably don't mean much to you..."

    Actually, they don't because they're INACCURATE TO BEGIN WITH!!!! Of course, how could we expect our "viewers" to understand basic geography? Note to "popular" network: not only do we understand basic geography, but we also know how to read. If your "correspondents" can't even READ the copy they are given, how are they supposed to REPORT the news???

    It's just another example of the "how long can the 'correspondent' talk journalism" being blathered all over the place. Journalism used to be about intelligently reporting the facts, not listening to the "correspondent" talk and talk and talk while their guests sit there quietly after being interrupted in mid-sentence for the fourth time.

    I am REALLY glad I can just go to the Polar Lander site and read the information in as much technical detail as I want without the "popular network of the day" filtering out all the stuff they don't think I'll understand for me.

    Sorry. I just get a little frustrated sometimes.
  57. Mars by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    modprobe mars

  58. Yes True, but the images are not all they dload by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That storage would be nice to store the Apache logs, but it seems unnecessary, the images aren't bulky (4 Gb/year). However, they would not keep a year of images in memory, for speed. Sound from the mic, the instrument pack data sets, etc...forgot those I guess???

  59. Replace NASA... Open it or something... by Dios · · Score: 2
    If NASA fails hear, I think its time for the to go. Their history of failure in recent years just seems to be rising steadily.

    What happened to the days when NASA took us to the moon. Nothing as great has happened in my life time as a result of NASA.

    Perhaps the bureacracy (sp?) that is NASA has grown to impede its own growth. In its younger years it seems to have accomplished tasks well beyond that which it is capable of today.

    So my question is, WHAT THE HELL HAPPENED?

    America seems motivated, and wanting to go forward. But NASA seems to want to give us a lack luster performance.

    Something needs to be done... Perhaps a NASA2 to inspire competition between the two, with congress appropriately funding the one making the most progress.

    I'm tired of waiting... Space should be a now thing... and was promised to us when we were kids... the now shouldn't be tomorrow...

  60. Hell yeah, it's my Birthday! by theLime · · Score: 1

    err,

    and stuff.

  61. Re:Some people on the internet do not live in the by DanaL · · Score: 1

    It wasn't moderated to 0. Anonymous Coward posts always start at 0.

  62. Is it overly complicated? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is this SOOOO hard?

    I know my GMT offset, even though I don't live in Europe.

    Eastern = GMT -0500
    Central = GMT -0600
    Mountain = GMT -0700
    Pacific = GMT -0800

    Eastern and Pacific are the only ones you need to remember. -0500, and -0500 - 0300 = -0800. Just remember Eastern, and remember that Pacific is three zones west.

    Everyone should know both their offset from GMT and from EST. Otherwise they're going to have trouble.

    Is it THAT complicated? I guess to people who use "meter" as a base for every fucking unit of measurement they have, having to actually remember TWO numbers can be a pain.

    1. Re:Is it overly complicated? by dylan_- · · Score: 2

      Is this SOOOO hard?

      I know my GMT offset, even though I don't live in Europe.

      That's because GMT is the standard. I know my GMT offset too. Maybe, therefore, it would be a good idea just to give the time in GMT? It's not trying to remember two numbers that's the pain, it's idiocy like expecting the whole world to memorise the name of each and every time zone, just in case something happens there.

      dylan_-


      --

      --
      Igor Presnyakov stole my hat
    2. Re:Is it overly complicated? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You don't have to know every time zone in the world. But it's not too hard to remember that the easternmost part of the United States is 5 hours west of GMT, and that the United States is 4 timezones wide. Eastern is obviously the eastmost, and Pacific obviously the westmost. I know roughly where timezone boundaries for other zones lie also. Think of it as a visual thing rather than a numerical thing. US Eastern is a mini-standard as well as GMT because it is the standard in the United States (nobody wants to have to subtract five or more from every time they see), and United States stuff often tends to wind up elsewhere. Sadly, a lot of Americans don't even KNOW their GMT offset, but most on the Internet, the ones who actually need to, do. For a while I tried to exclusively use UTC time in 24-hour format, but sadly when I started telling people in town that I'd be stopping by at 2230 UTC they'd say "what??"

      Ah well.

  63. !!! STOP IT !!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A message from Naked and Petrified Guy, to cow.

    COW, CUT IT THE FUCK OUT.

    When you troll, troll in moderation, and know when to stop. Otherwise you'll ruin it for everyone. Just like we Segfault crowd ruined it at Segfault.

    If you're trolling just to amuse yourself rather than to amuse others, you're just ruining it for everyone. You've got to be DISCRETE and NO OVERDUE IT. Watch people's responses. When they ALL become negative, stop. When you've still got some fans, then fine, go ahead.

    But please don't ruin it for the rest of us trolls and for the rest of Slashdot but posting so much garbage that you actually make stories UNREADABLE, or so much that Slashdot HAS to take action.

    DON'T MESS UP A GOOD THING.

  64. Sigh... slash-dotted already. by PGillingwater · · Score: 1
    Looks like the Webmaster needs to rethink his configuration. I notice even Slashdot.org's advertising banners sometimes don't appear -- would you believe that the advertisers get Slashdotted too? :-) ERROR The requested URL could not be retrieved

    While trying to retrieve the URL: http://www.marspolarlander.com/

    The following error was encountered:

    • Connection Failed

    The system returned: (79) Connection refused

    This means that: The remote site or server may be down. Please try again soon.

    Generated by squid/1.1.9@cache.iaea.org
    --
    Paul Gillingwater

    --
    Paul Gillingwater
    MBA, CISSP, CISM
    1. Re:Sigh... slash-dotted already. by PGillingwater · · Score: 1
      Just in case someone wants to debug this, here's a traceroute from where I am.

      1 ibmcisco.iaea.org (195.212.98.65) 13 ms 6 ms 5 ms
      2 vien1br1.vi.at.ibm.net (152.158.32.1) 51 ms 47 ms 80 ms
      3 ehni1br1.eh.de.ibm.net (152.158.2.1) 88 ms 63 ms 103 ms
      4 ehni1br2-10-0-0.eh.de.ibm.net (152.158.0.18) 55 ms 36 ms 36 ms
      5 beth1ar2-8-0-23.md.us.prserv.net (165.87.97.214) 128 ms 138 ms 149 ms
      6 beth1br1-ge-1-0-0-0.md.us.prserv.net (165.87.29.122) 137 ms 139 ms 131 ms
      7 atla1br1-12-0-5.ga.us.prserv.net (165.87.230.1) 149 ms 148 ms 147 ms
      8 atla1sr2-2-0-0.ga.us.prserv.net (165.87.234.4) 147 ms 158 ms 146 ms
      9 165.87.101.253 (165.87.101.253) 152 ms 155 ms 159 ms
      10 corerouter2.Atlanta.cw.net (204.70.9.143) 146 ms 156 ms 149 ms
      11 corerouter1.WillowSprings.cw.net (204.70.9.135) 168 ms 195 ms 170 ms
      12 acr1-loopback.Chicagochd.cw.net (208.172.2.61) 179 ms 183 ms 172 ms
      13 208.172.3.2 (208.172.3.2) 189 ms 176 ms 180 ms
      14 * www.marspolarlander.com (204.71.169.2) 176 ms 171 ms

      --
      Paul Gillingwater

      --
      Paul Gillingwater
      MBA, CISSP, CISM
  65. Re:***!!! CUT IT OUT !!!*** by -C-O-W- · · Score: 0

    Hmm ok.

    But now my question is:

    Why are they at 0 and not -1?


    - c o w

  66. BSD/OS probably == bigip load balancer by Marc+Slemko · · Score: 1

    They are probably using f5's bigip load balancer, which runs on BSD/OS and makes www.marspolarlander.com show up as a BSD/OS box. The actual boxes serving the content would be something behind that.

    Well, in this case the boxes behind it are netapp boxes ("netcache" is their product name) acting as accelerators. The idea here is that if most of their content is static (and it looks like it is), then the accelerators can serve the vast majority of the hits.

    You don't need a whole lot of disk IO, and lots of architectures can easily run out of network bandwidth or memory before having any problems with bus bandwidth.

  67. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 2

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  68. Spy sats. by Mr+T · · Score: 2
    I love this space stuff. Mars in particular. Last time they did one of these, July 4 a few years back, it was killing me. The radio silence thing during the landing just kills me. I keep thinking that the lander is going to break or something. I absolutley love the photos and the data they gather but the landing process sucks, at least from a spectator's perspective.

    This got me to thinking. The photos aren't great, they are good but they aren't awesome. Regardless of our record, I think the landing process is error prone. The landers don't last too long. The focus of their coverage is also extremely limited, Likewise, we can do insane stuff with spy satallites, like seeing through water and dirt like they did with the Nile river. Anyone want to start a petition to get an older spy sat donated to NASA? a 15 year old sat. should be far better than what they are landing, not terribly useful to the NRO anymore and putting it into place should be relatively cheap and assuming that they use metric units it should be a piece of cake. Then we could have high resolution photos from all sorts of places on Mars and with ground penetrating radar and photography we could look deeper than the current lander is going to look. Plus it would last for years and we could examine thousands of Martian locations we wouldn't get to examine the Martian dirt but I would think that our results would be just as good if not better. Plus they'd end up declassifying some more infor on what our spy sats can do...

    --
    This is my signature. There are many signatures like it but this one is mine..
  69. Long-comment bonus by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Long comments get a permanent +1, to those who have long comment bonus turned on (which is default).

  70. Mars 'Net Threatened By First Interstellar Backhoe by panjandrum · · Score: 1

    Came across this at Yahoo. I can't WAIT for AT&T's explanation on this one.

    .pjd

  71. Re:Post on slashdot in GMT, its the global standar by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Duh! Hello, are you really that dumb? You really didn't know that Pacific time is 3 hours off from Eastern time? Most people in the US learn that in grade school since you say you're in EST what's your excuse?

  72. Re:works fine for me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    To bad, if they'd used Windows2000 it could have easily handled the load.

    http://www.unisys.co m/events/comdex99/presentations/uis-ms.asp

    Their Windows2000 setup handled "More than 3 billion Web hits per day and 300 million page requests per day against up to 2 terabytes of data" and wasn't even using the W2K Advanced Datacenter Server.

  73. Good stuff by Stephen · · Score: 2

    Kudos to their webmaster for taking the trouble to write his configuration down. It's great that someone is prepared to share his experience with the world in this way.

    --
    11.00100100001111110110101010001000100001011010001 1000010001101001100010011
  74. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 2

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  75. How can you find out who has the worse karma? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I really want something to aim for!

  76. Some Sun kit in there too by ChrisRijk · · Score: 2
    Here's the Sun press release. They've got 4 Sun Netra t1's (pretty cute 1U high servers) to help with the website, and some Ultra 80's for other bits.

  77. Awesome... and scary by Powers · · Score: 1
    The Mars Polar Lander is only the fourth item we've attempted to land on Mars. I'm excited, but I'm also scared to death. There are too many things that could go wrong. We have no idea what kind of terrain this thing might land on. It could land on a rock, on the edge of a cliff, in a hole, etc.

    I'm worried about how much NASA is hyping this up (and they are hyping it!). Sure, if it goes well, it's great PR. But if something happens to it -- especially after losing the last satellite -- it's gonna be hard for NASA to maintain support. I guess maybe that's what scares me the most.

    Powers&8^]

    --

    Powers&8^]