It's not that NASA is covering up the proof of life they've found on Mars, it's just that they're trying to figure out who this Kilroy guy was before publishing the report.
Actually, those on the left keep saying that government shouldn't be used to FORCE integration if the individuals don't want to integrate... you know, that whole PERSONAL FREEDOM thing.... while the conservatives on the right are all about using government to abuse the rights of individuals, especially of anyone different than them.
In Egypt, we supported and kept in power someone not supported by a lot of people..... that ruffles peoples feathers (an amazingly simply fact a lot of people still don't seem to understand). He was more benevolent than say the Shah if Iran, but he was still strong armed in.
In, Iran Mosaddegh was democratically elected in the real sense of the word, and the country at the time was very pro-western. Khomeini played on the fact that the Shah was a brutal dictator who had killed tens of thousands of people with his secret police death squads. Their outrage at the US, of course, was that we were the ones that fucked them over in 1953, and directly lead to all those people being murdered.
Yahweh, Allah, God.... all the same, different languages. Judaism has lots of prophets, but Jesus ain't the messiah; Christianity ignores most of the prophets (although Catholicism has so, so , so many saints), and Jesus is their messiah; Islam has lots of prophets, Jesus and Mohammed being two of them.
I've always found it fascinating that Christians in the US, who supposedly are all about Jesus, blindly support Judaism which says point blank: Jesus wasn't the messiah, yet they are so vocally opposed to Islam which says that Jesus was a prophet of God.
I chalk it down to ignorance, stupidity... or both.
Not that you made any such claim, but those are all Old Testament scriptures, thus for Christians they have been overridden by the teachings of Jesus Christ. None of those apply to Christianity, which makes sense, as you don't see Christians running around trying to enforce anything of the sort.
You don't see it because you aren't looking. As for the whole "old testament" thing, I've suggested to some anti-gay bigots that we should be out stoning to death people who touch leather, work on Saturday, eat shellfish and such, and they use that (completely fucking stupid) line "but that's in the old testament, and we don't follow that anymore" only to turn around and use the command in Leviticus to support their anti-gay bigotry.
THE problem is, there's too many idiots who only listen to what their preacher says, and can't seem to find time to actually read the Bible. That's why their version of "God" seems to hate exactly who they hate. The other problem is, religious people ignoring the plank in their own eye, while thinking their shit don't stink and throwing stones at other people.... which is EXACTLY the problem with a lot of posters in the thread.
.... and as we saw during the great depression, a significant percentage of elderly people would be dying in the street in poverty because a capitalistic society cares about profit, and nothing else. There's a number of things Marx wrote about that, while fervent fascists dismiss them as ridiculous, we can actually see them in society. Its like these complete idiots still suggesting that their trickle-down voodoo bullshit economics "should" works, when all we have to do is look at the last 30+ years to see not only it's an abject failure, but it creates far more problems than it was supposed to solve.
Has anyone mentioned you have your head up your ass? You can TRY to redefine a word, but you just look stupider than fuck trying to defend that. If you're too stupid to use a word correctly, or don't know a words meaning to start with... buy a fucking dictionary. Quit trying to make the people around you be as fucking stupid as you are. I also suggest you try learning some history, as you don't seem to have a fucking clue there either.
Or the fucking idiots who were offended are the fucking idiots. Didn't Jesus ever say anything to his followers about not being whiny little thin skinned bitches and making him look bad? No? Maybe he should have.
I'm just going to come out and say it: you're a fucking idiot. That huge amount of scientists (i'd love a list of them, by the way) ends up being a handful of actual scientists in remotely connected fields who get a large portion of their income from oil companies; some scientists in completely non-related fields...also many of whom get money from oil companies; and then a bunch of idiots like you who have your head up your ass who are nothing more than whining, simpering idiots that are too damn stupid to even know what science is.
The problem is too many stupid idiots who want to remain as stupid as fucking possible, but then think their ignorant, full of shit opinion means something. Go out and be as stupid as you want to be... but don't expect anyone to think anything more of you than that you're a fucking idiot.
I am often amazed at how these radical conservative evangelicals who blindly profess that God exists because they have faith, turn around and try to suggest science proves their "faith."
Obviously their "faith" is a bunch of bullshit, and they have neither faith in God, nor faith in their own faith in God. Ive also often thought that is a God is so insecure he has to have a bunch of uneducated idiots running around professing his existence with every breath they take... he must not be much of a God in the first place.
Sure, although the name actually wasn't Jesus until got Romanized... but sure, i get your point. I'm sure there's a number of people named Jesus in the town i currently live in.
If you're "life" is almost entirely constructed by committee to serve as a figurehead, as Jesus' was at the Council of Nicaea, there's a pretty good chance that most all of it is nothing more than bullshit. The Romans kept fantastic records, and were probably on that border between anally retentive and accountant level.... yet they have no records of any of the bullshit that makes up the new testament. The only remotely contemporary is a notation in one of Josephus' works, except that is widely considered to have been added in by someone else at a much later date (the information was not found in previous works by Josephus, and the writing style is radically different than Josephus). For such a massive event that the Bible portrays it to be, you'd think someone there would have written down something like: "Socialist hippie rises from the dead; papyrus at 11."
You can't be as much of a fucking idiot as your post makes you look, can you? Are you so stupid you think that a label defines people?
The democratic party of Lincolns time was the rural conservative party who were opposed to the idea of a "United" States. You'd have to be a complete fucking idiot to compare the democratic party of today with the democrats of Lincolns time. Those same-minded conservatives fled the democratic party in the 60's to join the republican party....are you too damn stupid to have even a basic understanding of history?
You might also buy a dictionary and use it... you clearly do not have a basic understanding of "communism" either. Your anti-intellectualism is on full display.
And here less than a month ago i got modded as a troll for saying how much of a piece of crap the F-35 was, and pointing out it's massive overruns in budget bullshit. This has been in the news for years now. I can't believe there are still idiots who think this program is worth a shit.
Some of the crusades came about from the Catholic churches desire to expand their empire, others came about because the Catholic church decided it needed to kill some Christians that weren't giving the church enough money.
Christianity and Islam are the same... the masses defer to the few leaders "interpretations" of massively convoluted texts, while the most radical use convoluted interpretations of those texts to justify their personal hatreds and bigotries. Your opinion of Christianity is warped because YOU claim to be Christian, and YOUR side can do no wrong. You want to claim anything THEY do is terrorism, when if YOUR side did the same thing, it's not terrorism. It's called fucking hypocrisy.
As for "their flag"... who's? There's all sorts of flags by all sorts of groups and countries that are predominantly Muslim... and they mean different things. Your logic is just stupid on this.... by your logic, everyone in Mississippi is an anti-American insurrectionist that needs to be hung because their state incorporates the confederate battle flag. See... stupid.
Same thing they fly in now... nothing. The F-35 program, all 1.45 TRILLION of it's "current" projected cost and near decade long delays has produced a couple test planes that can't turn, can't climb, can't run, and can't fight worth a shit. It is an inferior piece of crap that cowards in congress keep funneling money to because they're cowards.
Sorry, being my age i heard the same stupid fucking crap from the same stupid fucking people back when Reagan gave amnesty to 7 million. Dipshit doomsayers like you just continue repeating the same fucking stupidity regardless of what actually happens, and you're too fucking stupid to look back and see reality. If you're going to complain about adding uneducated people to the workforce, perhaps you should go be an activist in Texas where the majority of high school students don't have the basic education to be able to get into a state college; or maybe Alabama where barely 70% of kids even graduate high school. I get it though, people like you just have to have someone else to blame for everything so you don't have to take that long hard look in the mirror to see how fucked up you are yourself.
Patrick Moore frequently portrays himself as a founder or co-founder of Greenpeace, and many news outlets have repeated this characterization. Although Mr. Moore played a significant role in Greenpeace Canada for several years, he did not found Greenpeace. Phil Cotes, Irving Stowe, and Jim Bohlen founded Greenpeace in 1970. Patrick Moore applied for a berth on the Phyllis Cormack in March, 1971 after the organization had already been in existence for a year. A copy of his application letter and Greenpeace's response are available here (PDF). [Greenpeace, 12/7/10]
What's sad is there's so many complete fucking morons in this country who believe these lying sacks of shit who are just out to make a buck.
The FBI doesn't even distinguish this kind of crime in a separate category. I think more on point though, is the summaries author making the ASSUMPTION that having looser/fewer gun regulations somehow makes us safer, when evidence shows that states that have looser/fewer gun regulations also have higher murder rates ( http://www.hsph.harvard.edu/hi... ). Somewhere in there is another social science fuck-up on drawing the wrong conclusion to the study they made... perhaps somewhere along the line of something like... some people can deal with the evidence presented by reality, others can't, or don't want to.
Actually, anyone that knows anything about science wouldn't think a model is an absolute... only complete fucking idiots would make that incredibly stupid mistake, well, and kids that haven't gotten to the 4th grade yet.
Slashdot Mirror
....and... you noticed.... gotcha!
It's not that NASA is covering up the proof of life they've found on Mars, it's just that they're trying to figure out who this Kilroy guy was before publishing the report.
Actually, those on the left keep saying that government shouldn't be used to FORCE integration if the individuals don't want to integrate... you know, that whole PERSONAL FREEDOM thing.... while the conservatives on the right are all about using government to abuse the rights of individuals, especially of anyone different than them.
I'd say no.
In Egypt, we supported and kept in power someone not supported by a lot of people..... that ruffles peoples feathers (an amazingly simply fact a lot of people still don't seem to understand). He was more benevolent than say the Shah if Iran, but he was still strong armed in.
In, Iran Mosaddegh was democratically elected in the real sense of the word, and the country at the time was very pro-western. Khomeini played on the fact that the Shah was a brutal dictator who had killed tens of thousands of people with his secret police death squads. Their outrage at the US, of course, was that we were the ones that fucked them over in 1953, and directly lead to all those people being murdered.
Yahweh, Allah, God.... all the same, different languages. Judaism has lots of prophets, but Jesus ain't the messiah; Christianity ignores most of the prophets (although Catholicism has so, so , so many saints), and Jesus is their messiah; Islam has lots of prophets, Jesus and Mohammed being two of them.
I've always found it fascinating that Christians in the US, who supposedly are all about Jesus, blindly support Judaism which says point blank: Jesus wasn't the messiah, yet they are so vocally opposed to Islam which says that Jesus was a prophet of God.
I chalk it down to ignorance, stupidity... or both.
Not that you made any such claim, but those are all Old Testament scriptures, thus for Christians they have been overridden by the teachings of Jesus Christ. None of those apply to Christianity, which makes sense, as you don't see Christians running around trying to enforce anything of the sort.
You don't see it because you aren't looking. As for the whole "old testament" thing, I've suggested to some anti-gay bigots that we should be out stoning to death people who touch leather, work on Saturday, eat shellfish and such, and they use that (completely fucking stupid) line "but that's in the old testament, and we don't follow that anymore" only to turn around and use the command in Leviticus to support their anti-gay bigotry.
THE problem is, there's too many idiots who only listen to what their preacher says, and can't seem to find time to actually read the Bible. That's why their version of "God" seems to hate exactly who they hate. The other problem is, religious people ignoring the plank in their own eye, while thinking their shit don't stink and throwing stones at other people.... which is EXACTLY the problem with a lot of posters in the thread.
.... and as we saw during the great depression, a significant percentage of elderly people would be dying in the street in poverty because a capitalistic society cares about profit, and nothing else. There's a number of things Marx wrote about that, while fervent fascists dismiss them as ridiculous, we can actually see them in society. Its like these complete idiots still suggesting that their trickle-down voodoo bullshit economics "should" works, when all we have to do is look at the last 30+ years to see not only it's an abject failure, but it creates far more problems than it was supposed to solve.
Has anyone mentioned you have your head up your ass? You can TRY to redefine a word, but you just look stupider than fuck trying to defend that. If you're too stupid to use a word correctly, or don't know a words meaning to start with... buy a fucking dictionary. Quit trying to make the people around you be as fucking stupid as you are. I also suggest you try learning some history, as you don't seem to have a fucking clue there either.
Or the fucking idiots who were offended are the fucking idiots. Didn't Jesus ever say anything to his followers about not being whiny little thin skinned bitches and making him look bad? No? Maybe he should have.
I'm just going to come out and say it: you're a fucking idiot. That huge amount of scientists (i'd love a list of them, by the way) ends up being a handful of actual scientists in remotely connected fields who get a large portion of their income from oil companies; some scientists in completely non-related fields...also many of whom get money from oil companies; and then a bunch of idiots like you who have your head up your ass who are nothing more than whining, simpering idiots that are too damn stupid to even know what science is.
The problem is too many stupid idiots who want to remain as stupid as fucking possible, but then think their ignorant, full of shit opinion means something. Go out and be as stupid as you want to be... but don't expect anyone to think anything more of you than that you're a fucking idiot.
I am often amazed at how these radical conservative evangelicals who blindly profess that God exists because they have faith, turn around and try to suggest science proves their "faith."
Obviously their "faith" is a bunch of bullshit, and they have neither faith in God, nor faith in their own faith in God. Ive also often thought that is a God is so insecure he has to have a bunch of uneducated idiots running around professing his existence with every breath they take... he must not be much of a God in the first place.
Sure, although the name actually wasn't Jesus until got Romanized... but sure, i get your point. I'm sure there's a number of people named Jesus in the town i currently live in.
If you're "life" is almost entirely constructed by committee to serve as a figurehead, as Jesus' was at the Council of Nicaea, there's a pretty good chance that most all of it is nothing more than bullshit. The Romans kept fantastic records, and were probably on that border between anally retentive and accountant level.... yet they have no records of any of the bullshit that makes up the new testament. The only remotely contemporary is a notation in one of Josephus' works, except that is widely considered to have been added in by someone else at a much later date (the information was not found in previous works by Josephus, and the writing style is radically different than Josephus). For such a massive event that the Bible portrays it to be, you'd think someone there would have written down something like: "Socialist hippie rises from the dead; papyrus at 11."
The balls of someone suggesting we celebrate some nut who packed a bomb in his underwear!! That's enough to make a lot of people testy.
I am saddened in a way that the guy didn't have a partner so we could label them a pair of nuts...but you can't have everything.
You can't be as much of a fucking idiot as your post makes you look, can you? Are you so stupid you think that a label defines people?
The democratic party of Lincolns time was the rural conservative party who were opposed to the idea of a "United" States. You'd have to be a complete fucking idiot to compare the democratic party of today with the democrats of Lincolns time. Those same-minded conservatives fled the democratic party in the 60's to join the republican party....are you too damn stupid to have even a basic understanding of history?
You might also buy a dictionary and use it... you clearly do not have a basic understanding of "communism" either. Your anti-intellectualism is on full display.
And here less than a month ago i got modded as a troll for saying how much of a piece of crap the F-35 was, and pointing out it's massive overruns in budget bullshit. This has been in the news for years now. I can't believe there are still idiots who think this program is worth a shit.
I think, mayhaps, you need to do a little more learning on things you attempt to speak about: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/A...
Some of the crusades came about from the Catholic churches desire to expand their empire, others came about because the Catholic church decided it needed to kill some Christians that weren't giving the church enough money.
Christianity and Islam are the same... the masses defer to the few leaders "interpretations" of massively convoluted texts, while the most radical use convoluted interpretations of those texts to justify their personal hatreds and bigotries. Your opinion of Christianity is warped because YOU claim to be Christian, and YOUR side can do no wrong. You want to claim anything THEY do is terrorism, when if YOUR side did the same thing, it's not terrorism. It's called fucking hypocrisy.
As for "their flag"... who's? There's all sorts of flags by all sorts of groups and countries that are predominantly Muslim... and they mean different things. Your logic is just stupid on this.... by your logic, everyone in Mississippi is an anti-American insurrectionist that needs to be hung because their state incorporates the confederate battle flag. See... stupid.
Same thing they fly in now... nothing. The F-35 program, all 1.45 TRILLION of it's "current" projected cost and near decade long delays has produced a couple test planes that can't turn, can't climb, can't run, and can't fight worth a shit. It is an inferior piece of crap that cowards in congress keep funneling money to because they're cowards.
Maybe this means there will finally be a use for that Green Lantern movie dvd.
You know why there's not a Bruce Lee meme like there is for Chuck Norris? Bruce Lee isn't a joke.
Sorry, being my age i heard the same stupid fucking crap from the same stupid fucking people back when Reagan gave amnesty to 7 million. Dipshit doomsayers like you just continue repeating the same fucking stupidity regardless of what actually happens, and you're too fucking stupid to look back and see reality. If you're going to complain about adding uneducated people to the workforce, perhaps you should go be an activist in Texas where the majority of high school students don't have the basic education to be able to get into a state college; or maybe Alabama where barely 70% of kids even graduate high school. I get it though, people like you just have to have someone else to blame for everything so you don't have to take that long hard look in the mirror to see how fucked up you are yourself.
http://mediamatters.org/resear...
Patrick Moore frequently portrays himself as a founder or co-founder of Greenpeace, and many news outlets have repeated this characterization. Although Mr. Moore played a significant role in Greenpeace Canada for several years, he did not found Greenpeace. Phil Cotes, Irving Stowe, and Jim Bohlen founded Greenpeace in 1970. Patrick Moore applied for a berth on the Phyllis Cormack in March, 1971 after the organization had already been in existence for a year. A copy of his application letter and Greenpeace's response are available here (PDF). [Greenpeace, 12/7/10]
What's sad is there's so many complete fucking morons in this country who believe these lying sacks of shit who are just out to make a buck.
The FBI doesn't even distinguish this kind of crime in a separate category. I think more on point though, is the summaries author making the ASSUMPTION that having looser/fewer gun regulations somehow makes us safer, when evidence shows that states that have looser/fewer gun regulations also have higher murder rates ( http://www.hsph.harvard.edu/hi... ). Somewhere in there is another social science fuck-up on drawing the wrong conclusion to the study they made... perhaps somewhere along the line of something like... some people can deal with the evidence presented by reality, others can't, or don't want to.
Quit being a koolaid drinking drama queen... and quit lying.
....and more directly: http://www.kcba.org/judicial/l...
http://mediamatters.org/blog/2...
Actually, anyone that knows anything about science wouldn't think a model is an absolute... only complete fucking idiots would make that incredibly stupid mistake, well, and kids that haven't gotten to the 4th grade yet.