Right. What of us who program in several languages very often? Your idea would make it very hard to write different languages and would work as a road block in learning a new language.
So it's not a perfect plan, unless you really think that the corporations are right when they force people to use languages that are ill suited for a given programming purpose.
So, no thanks.
It very hard not to be part of the problem. I struggle with this myself. It might be better to work for a co-operative or a non-profit, but they are often low-pay. If that's not an option, perhaps you can start a company or a co-operative yourself. Not wanting to go there, it's probably better to work for a small company than a large one, because the larger they get the more corrupt and less innovative they often are.
How about medical devices? Things that help and monitor old people and of that kind? Or some inventions to help traffic flows or some other kind of streamlining that actually make things better? You could also consider competing with existing companies that are taking a cut from something and just making it better and taking a smaller cut. That would leave more money for the consumers or governments or whoever is paying for the cut.
Small companies and startups often work on new innovative things and not all of their inventions are evil. They are often better working places in other ways as well. However, it's almost impossible to find a company that can only do good things. The economy is interconnected and there is almost no way of escaping the things that many do and it's quite likely that your company needs to work w/companies that aren't as high-minded as you might be.
There are many variables to this thing and nothing is perfect. When considering the environmental impact, human/labour/animal rights and not ripping off your customers and actually creating something of social value it gets so complicated that you cannot expect to find anything that would be completely satisfactory. Try to look for a lesser evil, a local maximum, if you will and then work to try to make it just a bit better.
And finally, it would actually help if you moved into a country that spends its taxes to build a better society rather than its military. Get a job in Scandinavia, for example. Just doing that would address many of things mentioned above, because we actually have useful laws up here, a working democracy where environmental issues are addressed and labour rights are honoured.
People should vote w/their feet and this doesn't only go for companies, it goes for countries, as well. I dunno if you have a family, but we actually have free schools and universities up here as well as free health care and so forth, but naturally you have to pay taxes to pay for them. However, your overall quality of life is much better this way and the societies are much better because of lower income disparity. How does a 37.5 hour work week sound to you like and actually getting paid for overtime? How about a 5 week vacation? The list goes on and on. I doubt making a few dollars more actually makes the equation more profitable, overall.
If you further consider that I belong to a union and I'm a member of a red/green left alliance party and this makes me no less valued at my workplace you should come to see how different things can be. It is normal to belong to a labour union up here.
"Studies on the Dunning–Kruger effect tend to focus on American test subjects. Similar studies on European subjects show marked muting of the effect;[citation needed] studies on some East Asian subjects suggest that something like the opposite of the Dunning–Kruger effect operates on self-assessment and motivation to improve:
Regardless of how pervasive the phenomenon is, it is clear from Dunning's and others' work that many Americans, at least sometimes and under some conditions, have a tendency to inflate their worth. It is interesting, therefore, to see the phenomenon's mirror opposite in another culture. In research comparing North American and East Asian self-assessments, Heine of the University of British Columbia finds that East Asians tend to underestimate their abilities, with an aim toward improving the self and getting along with others.[10]" => http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect#Cross-cultural_variation
We seem to agree on multiple issues here.:-)
Yes, us Finns really see the US of A as a sad, sad place. USA is beginning to look so much like Russia and China that it isn't even funny anymore. Just downright mournful.
The things you guys are doing to your education system will ensure your eventual downfall.
According to Miriam Elder, the Moscow correspondent for The Guardian it seems that United Russia may get less than 50% of the votes, but this might not mean that they get less than 50% of seats in the parliament because of the 7% threshold for the smaller parties.
Not saying this applies to your specific case, but the more specific the skill-set you are looking for the more likely it is that it won't be available. So you might have to do as you did and buy it from somewhere or you have to train your own. As a side-note, a very specific skill-set can be a liability for an employee. If your exotic skills suddenly are obsoleted, you may be in trouble.
The businesses complain, because they want cheap labour. Therefore they will complain until there is an excess of people for a given field and they lower salaries, etc. So listening to their complaints is questionable.
I don't know about other countries, but in Finland all teachers graduate from university. In addition, there are comparatively very few immigrants in Finnish schools, so it is a lot easier to teach and to learn than in many other countries. Both children and teachers have like 10 weeks of summer vacation and a couple of weeks off during the school season.
If you work hard, it's actually probably best to give your brain a break during your free time, especially in regards to actual programming. I think it could be okay to try out some new things and read about new techniques and what not, but I don't think I'd be on fire at work if I spent my free time programming even more.
I sometimes write proof-of-concept programs at home when I really feel like it, but rarely anything more. If I have to program at home it means that I sit too much in meetings at work and my need to express myself through code is unfulfilled. That, then, means that it's time for a new job where I get to actually write programs.
It would be better to report the issue to the user and provide links to well known antivirus companies. This way the user would be able to trust that the Feds aren't installing anything on their box while they may or may not remove what they tell the user...;-)
I'm the same. GUI:s drive me crazy. You can't search them. I used Windows XP (company policy >_) in my previous job for two years and never learned the icons on the lower right corner. I had to take the mouse cursor over them every time to get the balloon help which tells you what that icon means. Running Linux on XP saved my sanity.
I get äöøåøæðüÐ, etc using caps lock as an extra modifier key. Consult the nearest xmodmap-file near to you..
Re:Yeah but you got to let go
on
Anxiety and IT?
·
· Score: 1
Caffeine promotes anxiety. When getting stressed out, it's best to avoid caffeine altogether.
Re:Look at other people's work
on
Anxiety and IT?
·
· Score: 1
Good advice, but hard to follow after you've been laid off a couple of times even if you're very, very good.
Re:All the usuals + Meditation
on
Anxiety and IT?
·
· Score: 1
The problem for me is that when I'm stressed out I can't make myself meditate. I just completely don't feel like it. However, I micro-sleep, instead. And it start very quickly when something stops me, like a meeting.
Re:The best way to avoid all that anxiety ...
on
Anxiety and IT?
·
· Score: 2, Insightful
You can't do a proper job in all companies regardless of how good you are.
I took a C-programming job after a decade of C++ and I've been wondering whether I'm employable in the long run. Especially so, because I'm not doing low-level stuff. I think that were I do embedded, I'd be just fine.
It certainly helps that you're motivated and I don't know for how long you can keep that up. I know that most people would at least risk burning out w/that rate. In addition, working that much makes it less efficient. You don't get as much done in an hour, when you do so many of them. This is especially true in the long run and you might not even notice.
Having said that all, YMMV. My both parents work like 60 hours or more a week and they have been doing it for decades. But they haven't been programming. If you can really effectively write programs at that rate, I'd say that is rare, unless you are writing something that's quite routine. As said a lot of times, it really depends on the task complexity.
BTW: Your body probably won't like you working that much, either. Especially in the long run. But we are individuals and it might be that you're a bit different. However, I doubt that to some extent. Are you really being effective??
Yes, fooling themselves and their customers as we speak. It's been done in our field for at least 50 years. Certainly for longer in other engineering fields. I sometimes run out of hope w/this ever being fixed. I have no idea what most managers are taught at school regarding this, but I do know that it's not working in practice. And luckily, so do some of them. Unfortunately only some.
Slashdot Mirror
Right. What of us who program in several languages very often? Your idea would make it very hard to write different languages and would work as a road block in learning a new language. So it's not a perfect plan, unless you really think that the corporations are right when they force people to use languages that are ill suited for a given programming purpose. So, no thanks.
Why not just go home or take care of your own business after solving the client's issue in 10 minutes? Don't take the billable hour too seriously.
Here are the red pictures
Thanks.
It very hard not to be part of the problem. I struggle with this myself. It might be better to work for a co-operative or a non-profit, but they are often low-pay. If that's not an option, perhaps you can start a company or a co-operative yourself. Not wanting to go there, it's probably better to work for a small company than a large one, because the larger they get the more corrupt and less innovative they often are.
How about medical devices? Things that help and monitor old people and of that kind? Or some inventions to help traffic flows or some other kind of streamlining that actually make things better? You could also consider competing with existing companies that are taking a cut from something and just making it better and taking a smaller cut. That would leave more money for the consumers or governments or whoever is paying for the cut.
Small companies and startups often work on new innovative things and not all of their inventions are evil. They are often better working places in other ways as well. However, it's almost impossible to find a company that can only do good things. The economy is interconnected and there is almost no way of escaping the things that many do and it's quite likely that your company needs to work w/companies that aren't as high-minded as you might be.
There are many variables to this thing and nothing is perfect. When considering the environmental impact, human/labour/animal rights and not ripping off your customers and actually creating something of social value it gets so complicated that you cannot expect to find anything that would be completely satisfactory. Try to look for a lesser evil, a local maximum, if you will and then work to try to make it just a bit better.
And finally, it would actually help if you moved into a country that spends its taxes to build a better society rather than its military. Get a job in Scandinavia, for example. Just doing that would address many of things mentioned above, because we actually have useful laws up here, a working democracy where environmental issues are addressed and labour rights are honoured.
People should vote w/their feet and this doesn't only go for companies, it goes for countries, as well. I dunno if you have a family, but we actually have free schools and universities up here as well as free health care and so forth, but naturally you have to pay taxes to pay for them. However, your overall quality of life is much better this way and the societies are much better because of lower income disparity. How does a 37.5 hour work week sound to you like and actually getting paid for overtime? How about a 5 week vacation? The list goes on and on. I doubt making a few dollars more actually makes the equation more profitable, overall.
If you further consider that I belong to a union and I'm a member of a red/green left alliance party and this makes me no less valued at my workplace you should come to see how different things can be. It is normal to belong to a labour union up here.
"Studies on the Dunning–Kruger effect tend to focus on American test subjects. Similar studies on European subjects show marked muting of the effect;[citation needed] studies on some East Asian subjects suggest that something like the opposite of the Dunning–Kruger effect operates on self-assessment and motivation to improve: Regardless of how pervasive the phenomenon is, it is clear from Dunning's and others' work that many Americans, at least sometimes and under some conditions, have a tendency to inflate their worth. It is interesting, therefore, to see the phenomenon's mirror opposite in another culture. In research comparing North American and East Asian self-assessments, Heine of the University of British Columbia finds that East Asians tend to underestimate their abilities, with an aim toward improving the self and getting along with others.[10]" => http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect#Cross-cultural_variation
We seem to agree on multiple issues here. :-)
Yes, us Finns really see the US of A as a sad, sad place. USA is beginning to look so much like Russia and China that it isn't even funny anymore. Just downright mournful.
The things you guys are doing to your education system will ensure your eventual downfall.
Finn here, agreed. Sorry about double post, didn't notice I wasn't logged in.
According to Miriam Elder, the Moscow correspondent for The Guardian it seems that United Russia may get less than 50% of the votes, but this might not mean that they get less than 50% of seats in the parliament because of the 7% threshold for the smaller parties.
Not saying this applies to your specific case, but the more specific the skill-set you are looking for the more likely it is that it won't be available. So you might have to do as you did and buy it from somewhere or you have to train your own. As a side-note, a very specific skill-set can be a liability for an employee. If your exotic skills suddenly are obsoleted, you may be in trouble.
http://k.web.umkc.edu/keltons/Papers/501/functional%20finance.pdf
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Functional_finance#History_of_use
The businesses complain, because they want cheap labour. Therefore they will complain until there is an excess of people for a given field and they lower salaries, etc. So listening to their complaints is questionable.
I don't know about other countries, but in Finland all teachers graduate from university. In addition, there are comparatively very few immigrants in Finnish schools, so it is a lot easier to teach and to learn than in many other countries. Both children and teachers have like 10 weeks of summer vacation and a couple of weeks off during the school season.
If you work hard, it's actually probably best to give your brain a break during your free time, especially in regards to actual programming. I think it could be okay to try out some new things and read about new techniques and what not, but I don't think I'd be on fire at work if I spent my free time programming even more. I sometimes write proof-of-concept programs at home when I really feel like it, but rarely anything more. If I have to program at home it means that I sit too much in meetings at work and my need to express myself through code is unfulfilled. That, then, means that it's time for a new job where I get to actually write programs.
It would be better to report the issue to the user and provide links to well known antivirus companies. This way the user would be able to trust that the Feds aren't installing anything on their box while they may or may not remove what they tell the user... ;-)
I'm the same. GUI:s drive me crazy. You can't search them. I used Windows XP (company policy >_) in my previous job for two years and never learned the icons on the lower right corner. I had to take the mouse cursor over them every time to get the balloon help which tells you what that icon means. Running Linux on XP saved my sanity.
I get äöøåøæðüÐ, etc using caps lock as an extra modifier key. Consult the nearest xmodmap-file near to you..
Caffeine promotes anxiety. When getting stressed out, it's best to avoid caffeine altogether.
Good advice, but hard to follow after you've been laid off a couple of times even if you're very, very good.
The problem for me is that when I'm stressed out I can't make myself meditate. I just completely don't feel like it. However, I micro-sleep, instead. And it start very quickly when something stops me, like a meeting.
You can't do a proper job in all companies regardless of how good you are.
The manager can delegate the blame and the engineer gets fired.
I took a C-programming job after a decade of C++ and I've been wondering whether I'm employable in the long run. Especially so, because I'm not doing low-level stuff. I think that were I do embedded, I'd be just fine.
It certainly helps that you're motivated and I don't know for how long you can keep that up. I know that most people would at least risk burning out w/that rate. In addition, working that much makes it less efficient. You don't get as much done in an hour, when you do so many of them. This is especially true in the long run and you might not even notice.
Having said that all, YMMV. My both parents work like 60 hours or more a week and they have been doing it for decades. But they haven't been programming. If you can really effectively write programs at that rate, I'd say that is rare, unless you are writing something that's quite routine. As said a lot of times, it really depends on the task complexity.
BTW: Your body probably won't like you working that much, either. Especially in the long run. But we are individuals and it might be that you're a bit different. However, I doubt that to some extent. Are you really being effective??
Yes, fooling themselves and their customers as we speak. It's been done in our field for at least 50 years. Certainly for longer in other engineering fields. I sometimes run out of hope w/this ever being fixed. I have no idea what most managers are taught at school regarding this, but I do know that it's not working in practice. And luckily, so do some of them. Unfortunately only some.