And that's great if you live under Sharia law. If you live here but wish to live under Sharia law, then move to such a nation where it exists! Go there and enjoy your freedom of speech... but when someone decapitates you for your words, or your girlfriend because she was in a car with another guy, please don't complain. Law in the Western world is based on rationality(most of the time), not forcing someone else's morals onto someone else - again, the individual rights and freedoms of many, vs the feelings of a few.
There is no misunderstanding - I purport that you shouldn't have to fear losing your life to say what you believe, which is why explicit legal protection of the right is required.
Security is another concern, in long distance links and metro wifi. If I have the hardware, I can listen to what you say, and speak my piece to the network too. I may have to break the encryption, and I may have to spoof a MAC, but if you can talk to a machine on the airwaves, so can I. I can also MITM most communications rather easily, and poison communications. Metro wifi and wireless point to point links are not replacements for cat6 droplines/FIOS.
You've gotta take the good with the bad, and the bad with the good. You can choose to not drink, or smoke, and that's cool. That's totally within your rights. But not everyone that drinks is an alcoholic, and willingly pickles their liver. Those that do, it's their choice.
Enslave empoverished women and sell them for sex in Nevada? We've got laws against slavery, and legal prostitution has licensing requirements. According to a quick wikipedia check, pimping in the usual form is illegal too. The only way I can see legal(and even this is a stretch, and I've got a feeling a judge would rule with the woman) sexual pseudo-slavery in Nevada is through contract, and we've got laws against contract under duress.
To understand why these rights exist, you must understand the principles that this government was founded upon (even though they really don't apply now-a-days unless it suits someone with money), being minimally intrusive in private matters. The government is not supposed to have any rights that it's not explicitly granted through law, nothing illegal not explicitly declared illegal. It's about the rights of many, regardless of the feelings of a few. You may not appreciate your freedom of speech, but I do, because it allows you to voice your displeasure.
At work, we just mounted the iso with daemon tools and then mounted it over SMB for computers that didn't have DVD burners, otherwise, we burned the updated ISO image to a DVD. Much faster install too, being that DVDs have a faster read/write than CDs.
It's an idea. I mean, with the densities in CCD tech now-a-days(which can be used for IR reception), the replacement of the IR collminator and diode with a CCD an extremely wide angle lens could easily be done, and it'd all look the same to joe blow, and even geeks that didn't pay attention. Spooky. Time to go check the settop boxes...
There's a solution to your problems, it's called mknod. Prepare the file in ramdisk with dd, make the file special, and then use mdraid. The file can be synced to disks on the fly w/ mdraid, and it will appear as a normal block device so you can put whatever FS you'd like on it.
man mknod
Also, a loopfile may also fix the proposed issues.
man losetup
The experimental new design for Linux's virtual memory system would turn a large amount of system RAM into a fast RAM disk with automatic sync to magnetic media. That's already being done by people with tmpfs, dd'ing a file onto it with/dev/zero to fix the size, mknod to make it a block device, and then md raid1.... it's been done for years.
Current AVs rely on databases of known definitions. With few definitions for OS X, and no current malware in the wild, there is no point to a database. Heuristics are shit, and easy to fool currently, also subject to false positives(a customer brought in a computer once where Norton was going off on DaggerFall's setup.ini, for example, but riddled with shit like sdbot that should have been caught), making the point moot. Great way to slow down your system and throw away some money, though!
Packet filtering. Terminate TCP packet transmissions when a certain number of controversial keywords are detected. This affects all TCP protocols such as HTTP, FTP or POP, but Search engine pages are more likely to be censored. Typical circumvention methods are to use encrypted protocols such as VPN and SSL, to escape the HTML content, or reducing the TCP/IP stack's MTU, thus reducing the amount of text contained in a given packet.
Connection reset. If a previous TCP connection is blocked by the filter, future connection attempts from both sides will also be blocked for up to 30 minutes. Depending on the location of the block, other users or Web sites may be also blocked if the communications are routed to the location of the block. A circumvention method is to ignore the reset packet sent by the firewall.
So, take two gig-e links - one on each side of the firewall - and start spoofing pre-negotiated conversations like crazy, isolating all the Chinese IPs from the rest of the world... I think you could use a few pcap files, tcpreplay and a perl script to do it. I've got no idea how much that would disrupt international business on their end, or if the Chinese government would even care, but it'd be interesting to see none the less.
There is no human right to the internet. Billions of people survive every day without being addicted to staring at a glass screen from which images produced by radiation appear.
"CRT is not a drug. I used to suck dick for LCD. Now that's an addiction. You ever suck some dick for CRT?"
Next on Dr Phil: "CRT used to be enough, but then my left eye started twitching, so I needed more... and then the symptoms worsened, I got headaches... and then, I had to move on to the harder drug, LCD."
Sorta like a woman! Only, we can fix servers. We can't fix women... There's, no fixing what can't be fixed - Only god can fix them! But, the New York Times said god is dead.
You're right, money's not the reason [smart] people enlist. But, I don't want to join the marines for the money - if I'm going to be doing what I do for the USAF(which is what they are asking), I intend for them to pay me what I'm worth. I'm not going to go from doing it now and then join up, taking a paycut just to do it for the government. In the private sector, they don't own me - if the USAF wants to have me doing *the same thing*, not only should they pay me the same, they should pay me more. Until then, I'm not biting. I'll go a different path without incriminating myself, and without completely seperating myself from my friends to protect them, TYVM.
I've got some questions, doubt they'll be answered(wish I coulda caught the original article).... or atleast answered with the nonanswers we got here.
I've been in IS now for over a decade, almost exclusively as a blackhat. In the past few years I've gotten into doing "unconventional" threat response - blackhats can be the best whitehats, y'know, learning through doing. Now tell me, why should I go in at an entry level paygrade when I can make more as a civilian? What gaurentees do I have of immunity? Why should I bring my tricks to your trade, when it's unlikely I'd be in an enviornment of trust anyways? As is I've got a juvi record and wouldn't get a sec. clearance anyways. I've got alot to lose by going in, including the trust and respect of those around me, whom I've been running with for 12 years -- but nothing of gain is apparent. What about the risk of being given a different AFSC? I've got some friends that went in 13D together, showed up to boot, and were told they were 11B now.
These are the thoughts on our minds. Personally, I've been considering enlisting for a long time now, but USMC. Give me some real answers(unlike those posted above), some gaurentees on paper, and maybe I'll consider USAF. 'Til then, no way.
Really, it's not. It's about Comcast performing MITM attacks on a mass scale. We've got laws to cover this shit, I'm just waiting for the suit to come in. Calling this network neutrality is only going to hurt the overall arguement for it.
Slashdot Mirror
And that's great if you live under Sharia law. If you live here but wish to live under Sharia law, then move to such a nation where it exists! Go there and enjoy your freedom of speech... but when someone decapitates you for your words, or your girlfriend because she was in a car with another guy, please don't complain. Law in the Western world is based on rationality(most of the time), not forcing someone else's morals onto someone else - again, the individual rights and freedoms of many, vs the feelings of a few.
There is no misunderstanding - I purport that you shouldn't have to fear losing your life to say what you believe, which is why explicit legal protection of the right is required.
Security is another concern, in long distance links and metro wifi. If I have the hardware, I can listen to what you say, and speak my piece to the network too. I may have to break the encryption, and I may have to spoof a MAC, but if you can talk to a machine on the airwaves, so can I. I can also MITM most communications rather easily, and poison communications. Metro wifi and wireless point to point links are not replacements for cat6 droplines/FIOS.
You've gotta take the good with the bad, and the bad with the good. You can choose to not drink, or smoke, and that's cool. That's totally within your rights. But not everyone that drinks is an alcoholic, and willingly pickles their liver. Those that do, it's their choice.
Enslave empoverished women and sell them for sex in Nevada? We've got laws against slavery, and legal prostitution has licensing requirements. According to a quick wikipedia check, pimping in the usual form is illegal too. The only way I can see legal(and even this is a stretch, and I've got a feeling a judge would rule with the woman) sexual pseudo-slavery in Nevada is through contract, and we've got laws against contract under duress.
To understand why these rights exist, you must understand the principles that this government was founded upon (even though they really don't apply now-a-days unless it suits someone with money), being minimally intrusive in private matters. The government is not supposed to have any rights that it's not explicitly granted through law, nothing illegal not explicitly declared illegal. It's about the rights of many, regardless of the feelings of a few. You may not appreciate your freedom of speech, but I do, because it allows you to voice your displeasure.
I wrote and complained, but considering I don't bomb people when I don't get my way, I got no reply.
Are you suggesting we start bombing our senators instead?
Slipstream. driverpacks.net
At work, we just mounted the iso with daemon tools and then mounted it over SMB for computers that didn't have DVD burners, otherwise, we burned the updated ISO image to a DVD. Much faster install too, being that DVDs have a faster read/write than CDs.
It's an idea. I mean, with the densities in CCD tech now-a-days(which can be used for IR reception), the replacement of the IR collminator and diode with a CCD an extremely wide angle lens could easily be done, and it'd all look the same to joe blow, and even geeks that didn't pay attention. Spooky. Time to go check the settop boxes...
It's not a "hack", any more than a swapfile is. And, md/dmraid will do asynchronous writes.
There's a solution to your problems, it's called mknod. Prepare the file in ramdisk with dd, make the file special, and then use mdraid. The file can be synced to disks on the fly w/ mdraid, and it will appear as a normal block device so you can put whatever FS you'd like on it.
;)
man mknod
Also, a loopfile may also fix the proposed issues.
man losetup
Current AVs rely on databases of known definitions. With few definitions for OS X, and no current malware in the wild, there is no point to a database. Heuristics are shit, and easy to fool currently, also subject to false positives(a customer brought in a computer once where Norton was going off on DaggerFall's setup.ini, for example, but riddled with shit like sdbot that should have been caught), making the point moot. Great way to slow down your system and throw away some money, though!
What happens when a CPU gos "OH SHI-"?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_great_firewall_of_china
So, take two gig-e links - one on each side of the firewall - and start spoofing pre-negotiated conversations like crazy, isolating all the Chinese IPs from the rest of the world... I think you could use a few pcap files, tcpreplay and a perl script to do it. I've got no idea how much that would disrupt international business on their end, or if the Chinese government would even care, but it'd be interesting to see none the less.
Next on Dr Phil: "CRT used to be enough, but then my left eye started twitching, so I needed more... and then the symptoms worsened, I got headaches... and then, I had to move on to the harder drug, LCD."
I put on my robe and wizard hat...
PS: Forgot http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/28285/info
Details on the latest examples
http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2008-0308
http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2008-0309
You can take my U3 drive from my cold, dead fingers! Gonzor's payload comes in handy.
Sorta like a woman! Only, we can fix servers. We can't fix women... There's, no fixing what can't be fixed - Only god can fix them! But, the New York Times said god is dead.
You're right, money's not the reason [smart] people enlist. But, I don't want to join the marines for the money - if I'm going to be doing what I do for the USAF(which is what they are asking), I intend for them to pay me what I'm worth. I'm not going to go from doing it now and then join up, taking a paycut just to do it for the government. In the private sector, they don't own me - if the USAF wants to have me doing *the same thing*, not only should they pay me the same, they should pay me more. Until then, I'm not biting. I'll go a different path without incriminating myself, and without completely seperating myself from my friends to protect them, TYVM.
I've got some questions, doubt they'll be answered(wish I coulda caught the original article).... or atleast answered with the nonanswers we got here.
I've been in IS now for over a decade, almost exclusively as a blackhat. In the past few years I've gotten into doing "unconventional" threat response - blackhats can be the best whitehats, y'know, learning through doing. Now tell me, why should I go in at an entry level paygrade when I can make more as a civilian? What gaurentees do I have of immunity? Why should I bring my tricks to your trade, when it's unlikely I'd be in an enviornment of trust anyways? As is I've got a juvi record and wouldn't get a sec. clearance anyways. I've got alot to lose by going in, including the trust and respect of those around me, whom I've been running with for 12 years -- but nothing of gain is apparent. What about the risk of being given a different AFSC? I've got some friends that went in 13D together, showed up to boot, and were told they were 11B now.
These are the thoughts on our minds. Personally, I've been considering enlisting for a long time now, but USMC. Give me some real answers(unlike those posted above), some gaurentees on paper, and maybe I'll consider USAF. 'Til then, no way.
Really, it's not. It's about Comcast performing MITM attacks on a mass scale. We've got laws to cover this shit, I'm just waiting for the suit to come in. Calling this network neutrality is only going to hurt the overall arguement for it.
Nic cards could be the last thing to be powered up.
Breaking WoL.