I don't know much about Bitcoin, and it's probably a stupid question, but where did the BTCs go? Isn't it possible to trace it, and prove that you owned them?
If you ask me, I'll say $12'000. It's a $450'000 purchase, a $230'000 mortgage, I'll pay an average of 3.5% interest per year, I'll have paid it off in 10 years.
Wait, what? 230 000*3.5%*10 = 80 500 $12 000 would be about 0.5% interest per year Did I miss something?
It goes back and forth. Canon got a lot of Nikon users when only Canon had full frame cameras. Nikon got a lot of Canon users (back?) with D3/D700/D300 Nikon got some Canon users with the 14-24 f/2.8 Nikon got some Canon users with the D800 Nikon got some Canon users with better CLS/TTL flash system Canon got many Nikon users for video Fuji now gets many Nikon/Canon users with X-trans sensor, good ergonomics and great lenses Sony got some Nikon/Canon users with small cameras and big sensors, but lost them again with slow and expensive lenses and lack of support Nikon lost customers with sloppy quality control Canon lost customers with not so good sensors
1) I haven't seen GOTO statements since my GWBASIC days, and I've surely never seen this many. 2) I really like one-liners for if statements in Ruby: "do_this if x==1" 3) Two-liners for C if statements without curly braces feel wrong, are dangerous and hard to read 4) http://xkcd.com/292/ 5) GOTO 1
The only meaningful comparison would be sustainable water usage. People may realize one day that it isn't a good idea to build huge cities, swimming pools, golf courses and water shows in the friggin desert.
I might be wrong, but it's my interpretation of Gödel's incompleteness theorems. If you're in the Matrix, you cannot prove you're in the Matrix, if you're in a big simulation, you cannot prove you're part of the simulation. So the definitive answer to this question is : "Maybe".
Typisch Deutsch: * We don't want nukes * We care about the environment * We want big cars * We want good air quality * We have a lot of coal so why not use it? * We want electric cars * We don't want wind turbine, radioactive waste or power lines in our backyard * We don't want to reduce our energy consumption * We understand global warming is a big problem * We want to fly to Mallorca twice a year * We want cheap gas * We want cheap electricity
I'd say most of the German population would agree with all those statements, without realizing that many of them are in direct contradiction.
+1. Sad truth. A lot of people don't understand that the less they give as customers, the less they'll receive as employees. It's the same problem at a global level : Germany doesn't understand either that a 2 billion $ train produced in Germany is much cheaper than a 1 billion $ train produced in China. Karma and macroeconomics are bitches.
Slashdot Mirror
I'm happy with Mint-MATE, thank you very much, and sure as hell doesn't look dated and ugly.
What part of "As usual, ask as many as you'd like, but please, one question per post." don't you understand?
"Only two orders of magnitude"?
Well, that's the difference between flying and staying on the tarmac.
I don't know much about Bitcoin, and it's probably a stupid question, but where did the BTCs go?
Isn't it possible to trace it, and prove that you owned them?
zsh, vim+plugins, ssh, ssh keys, unison, git, rvm for ruby and some gems, guake/yakuake, htop, solarized and all the corresponding config files
I'm sorry, but the more you explain yourself, the less I understand.
Wait, what?
230 000*3.5%*10 = 80 500
$12 000 would be about 0.5% interest per year
Did I miss something?
It goes back and forth.
Canon got a lot of Nikon users when only Canon had full frame cameras.
Nikon got a lot of Canon users (back?) with D3/D700/D300
Nikon got some Canon users with the 14-24 f/2.8
Nikon got some Canon users with the D800
Nikon got some Canon users with better CLS/TTL flash system
Canon got many Nikon users for video
Fuji now gets many Nikon/Canon users with X-trans sensor, good ergonomics and great lenses
Sony got some Nikon/Canon users with small cameras and big sensors, but lost them again with slow and expensive lenses and lack of support
Nikon lost customers with sloppy quality control
Canon lost customers with not so good sensors
The correct answer is Mu :
http://nl.urbandictionary.com/...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/M...
If you really want to talk about how technology is changing the world and how the next 40 years might look like, you'll have to mention peak oil and climate change.
http://physics.ucsd.edu/do-the...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/O...
No field that behaves anything like molasses would be consistent with that principle.
see ether.
1) I haven't seen GOTO statements since my GWBASIC days, and I've surely never seen this many.
2) I really like one-liners for if statements in Ruby: "do_this if x==1"
3) Two-liners for C if statements without curly braces feel wrong, are dangerous and hard to read
4) http://xkcd.com/292/
5) GOTO 1
Good!
Continuing in this direction, Ubuntu 18.04 might be as good as Ubuntu 10.10!
it could ???
"Bread and circuses" is a 2000 years old expression.
The only meaningful comparison would be sustainable water usage.
People may realize one day that it isn't a good idea to build huge cities, swimming pools, golf courses and water shows in the friggin desert.
I don't like the answer, but it could be worse, and it's nice the director answered honestly.
Why? Because there are 7 billion people on Earth.
I might be wrong, but it's my interpretation of Gödel's incompleteness theorems.
If you're in the Matrix, you cannot prove you're in the Matrix, if you're in a big simulation, you cannot prove you're part of the simulation.
So the definitive answer to this question is : "Maybe".
It might have to do with the fact that modern automobile was invented in Stuttgart (south of Germany).
Typisch Deutsch:
* We don't want nukes
* We care about the environment
* We want big cars
* We want good air quality
* We have a lot of coal so why not use it?
* We want electric cars
* We don't want wind turbine, radioactive waste or power lines in our backyard
* We don't want to reduce our energy consumption
* We understand global warming is a big problem
* We want to fly to Mallorca twice a year
* We want cheap gas
* We want cheap electricity
I'd say most of the German population would agree with all those statements, without realizing that many of them are in direct contradiction.
Nevermind : http://www.thelocal.se/2014011...
[citation needed]
Best explanation I've read so far :
http://theoatmeal.com/pl/worki...
+1. Sad truth.
A lot of people don't understand that the less they give as customers, the less they'll receive as employees.
It's the same problem at a global level : Germany doesn't understand either that a 2 billion $ train produced in Germany is much cheaper than a 1 billion $ train produced in China.
Karma and macroeconomics are bitches.
Or maybe we'll go back to farming and repairing.
Fossil fuels are the ones doing most of the work, and they won't be here forever.