So, "screen" has always been a good way to ensure that processes don't get killed randomly by disconnections, logout or X crashes. Then comes systemd and kills all your processes at logout, even when launched with screen. Finally, then comes Poettering, explaining you that you're a moron if you expect to keep those processes running. Seriously, the systemd devs make it really hard no to hate them.
inside the.profile of my colleagues when they leave their terminal open. A few weeks after, I complain that my Windows desktop seems to be always booting slower and slower, but that hopefully, it's never been a problem with Linux.
Both seem to have been written : COBOL on Javascript last summer (see title), Javascript on COBOL recently (that's the piece of news, so it's not mentioned in the title).
It's probably the most beginner-friendly telescope there is. They're cheap, they're super-easy to aim (like a cannon, basically), you don't have to align it to the North Star, you don't have to lock/unlock screws while moving. The mirror is big enough to see all the planets, double-stars and some galaxies/clusters/nebulaes, even in light-polluted areas. I could look at Jupiter/Moon/Saturn/ISS every night and not get tired of it. It's a wonderful experience to see the great red storm or Io's shadow on Jupiter. It's nowhere near as detailed as on NASA pictures, but it's very enjoyable to see it directly. My daughter enjoys it too, and can track the moon by her own (she's 5). I was a complete beginner a year ago, and learned a lot just using this telescope outside, and looking at Stellarium every now and then. I still have much to learn. http://www.skyandtelescope.com... is a great todo-list. What's funny is that for this price, you cannot get any decent optical tube or any decent tripod. With a dobsonian, you get both, and they're more than good enough for many astronomical needs.
Isn't something missing? For the first time ever? For the first time since....? http://www.w3schools.com/brows... Firefox used to beat IE in 2009 for example.
If you like seeing this bright spot flying through the sky, you'll love seeing the whole actual ISS structure (basically like this : H) through a telescope. I wasn't sure it would be possible, but I tried it with my small dobsonian, and saw it for a few seconds. Tracking is a bit of a PITA, so it helps a lot to have someone else roughly track it via the finder scope, while you adjust focus and keep the ISS exactly in the middle of the eyepiece. It's a wonderful experience, even for non-geeks. My family and neighbourhood kids enjoyed it a lot.
Sorry for the slashvertisement, but this telescope is affordable, very good, and very suitable for ISS tracking : http://www.telescope.com/Teles... Some friends with bigger telescopes and equatorial go-to mount bought it just to be able to see the ISS.
A friend of mine wiped a part of my music collection 10 years ago, when he wanted to copy some mp3s from his ipod to my computer. He installed ITunes and selected "synchronize". Well, it synchronized the Ipod and my computer just fine, deleting all my mp3s that weren't on his Ipod. I had backups and original CDs, but I really couldn't believe how shitty the Ipod/Itunes design was.
Exactly. It's like RAW images from your camera. You don't see any difference between RAW and JPGs until you have to save blown highlights, change contrast/shadows/white balance.
That's a chicken and egg problem : it's easy to fly 6000 miles, so it's okay to live far away from close relatives. You live far away from relatives, so you "need" to fly 6000 miles. Peak oil will sort this problem out.
Slashdot Mirror
Fun fact : PulseAudio was written by Poettering.
EVC
You're totally right he didn't call anyone a moron on this issue, *yet*.
So, "screen" has always been a good way to ensure that processes don't get killed randomly by disconnections, logout or X crashes.
Then comes systemd and kills all your processes at logout, even when launched with screen.
Finally, then comes Poettering, explaining you that you're a moron if you expect to keep those processes running.
Seriously, the systemd devs make it really hard no to hate them.
No mod point left. So :
thank you for your posts, +5 Informative.
[citation needed]
No mention of Google in the title. That's weird.
My favorite is still writing
inside the .profile of my colleagues when they leave their terminal open.
A few weeks after, I complain that my Windows desktop seems to be always booting slower and slower, but that hopefully, it's never been a problem with Linux.
So it's "X trillion", where X could be anything between 2 and 999, and trillion could be 10**12 or 10**18. :)
My personal favorite :
http://trendmodels.es/fine-bau...
If your marriage can be ruined by Facebook, it probably could be ruined by many other unrelated things.
Don't put them in the same bin. Both are dynamically typed, but Ruby is strongly typed and JS is weakly typed.
JS:
Ruby:
You don't need to.
Both have correct Ruby syntax.
Both seem to have been written : COBOL on Javascript last summer (see title), Javascript on COBOL recently (that's the piece of news, so it's not mentioned in the title).
It's probably the most beginner-friendly telescope there is.
They're cheap, they're super-easy to aim (like a cannon, basically), you don't have to align it to the North Star, you don't have to lock/unlock screws while moving.
The mirror is big enough to see all the planets, double-stars and some galaxies/clusters/nebulaes, even in light-polluted areas. I could look at Jupiter/Moon/Saturn/ISS every night and not get tired of it. It's a wonderful experience to see the great red storm or Io's shadow on Jupiter. It's nowhere near as detailed as on NASA pictures, but it's very enjoyable to see it directly.
My daughter enjoys it too, and can track the moon by her own (she's 5).
I was a complete beginner a year ago, and learned a lot just using this telescope outside, and looking at Stellarium every now and then. I still have much to learn.
http://www.skyandtelescope.com... is a great todo-list.
What's funny is that for this price, you cannot get any decent optical tube or any decent tripod. With a dobsonian, you get both, and they're more than good enough for many astronomical needs.
Isn't something missing? For the first time ever? For the first time since ....?
http://www.w3schools.com/brows...
Firefox used to beat IE in 2009 for example.
To be fair, Azureus was great but Vuze is a piece of malware shit.
It might not even be related to Sourceforge.
If you like seeing this bright spot flying through the sky, you'll love seeing the whole actual ISS structure (basically like this : H) through a telescope.
I wasn't sure it would be possible, but I tried it with my small dobsonian, and saw it for a few seconds. Tracking is a bit of a PITA, so it helps a lot to have someone else roughly track it via the finder scope, while you adjust focus and keep the ISS exactly in the middle of the eyepiece.
It's a wonderful experience, even for non-geeks. My family and neighbourhood kids enjoyed it a lot.
Sorry for the slashvertisement, but this telescope is affordable, very good, and very suitable for ISS tracking :
http://www.telescope.com/Teles...
Some friends with bigger telescopes and equatorial go-to mount bought it just to be able to see the ISS.
A friend of mine wiped a part of my music collection 10 years ago, when he wanted to copy some mp3s from his ipod to my computer. He installed ITunes and selected "synchronize". Well, it synchronized the Ipod and my computer just fine, deleting all my mp3s that weren't on his Ipod. I had backups and original CDs, but I really couldn't believe how shitty the Ipod/Itunes design was.
Exactly. It's like RAW images from your camera.
You don't see any difference between RAW and JPGs until you have to save blown highlights, change contrast/shadows/white balance.
That's a chicken and egg problem : it's easy to fly 6000 miles, so it's okay to live far away from close relatives.
You live far away from relatives, so you "need" to fly 6000 miles.
Peak oil will sort this problem out.
You're right, but the GP basically wrote that exp(x)==x**2.
Please, no.
On a related note : https://www.youtube.com/watch?... :D