They try to get a point across, and end up mucking up the details.
It's a BASIC interpreter, NOT a BASIC compiler. Even Bill Gates wouldn't make that mistake.
It doesn't matter whether a new phenomenon is 'big' or 'small', as long as it can stay agile and get fresh ideas. Linux has a big advantage here due to its development model. If the next two great programmers want to hack and rewrite it, they can feel free to do so, and send patches.
Once we get to page two, we finally get to the real reason: NT either doesn't work, or is too expensive!
NT: no, but you could give us more money instead. Linux: would you like fries with that? ketchup?
Now, I could do without the journalist speak here. There's a good message buried in some of this Katz-ian drivel, which goes something like this: people without lots of cash, and people concerned with quality will find a free, UNIX-like solution. People with a lot of money who believe sales reps will use a Microsoft solution. Innovative startups don't have a lot of money. Ergo, the future is Linux, *BSD, or something, with Linux being the most popular at the moment.
However, we could just post a link to NT vs. Linux every week and be done with that.
An interesting point could have been: since Microsoft doesn't write good code, why don't they just steal code from *BSD? It's free, it's legal, and the advertising clause is gone. Probably they wouldn't because of their arrogance, and MacOS X has a head start on them for stealing from BSD. --- pb Reply rather than vaguely moderate me.
"Whatever else you are told to believe, do not accept that size is unimportant"
Yeah, we hear *that* one all the time. So what are you saying? Oh, smaller is *better*? Yeah, those nerds use *that* excuse all the time.
Any female slashdot readers out there want to confirm or deny these accusations? And what about that bit with the standard mounting process, do you liberated women agree with that too? And... hey, is this segfault?
I guess the NSA will have rooms full of these things running some proprietary SMP bead-manipulating operating system to break our high-tech Triple-XOR implementations.:) --- pb Reply rather than vaguely moderate me.
There's a big difference between a behavior that helps your profit margin and "the right way to do things". Microsoft won't learn because their definition of helping involves money, not the community. Of course, they're a greedy corporation, so what do we expect, really.
Linux developers write for Linux. The small ones can get away with saying "hey, I'm sorry, I didn't have a PPC or an Alpha lying around". Hey, I know I don't. Microsoft doesn't have this excuse, and they didn't use it when they released NT. They just didn't maintain any of the other versions due to "lack of interest".
Again, Linux developers shouldn't be releasing things binary-only, either. Linus didn't do this, even if the first (many) releases were x86-only. (why? Well, that's all he had to code for...:) However, if they work for big evil corporations...:| --- pb Reply rather than vaguely moderate me.
And here I thought the Macintosh had a short Half Life.:)
At least Carmack (with Quake) and Netscape (from the beginning, but especially with Mozilla) managed to get this one right. Program cross-platform apps from the beginning, use or make standard libraries to simplify your task.
This is a lesson that I would like to see Microsoft learn. They release software late for the Macintosh all the time. (and some Mac users were happy about this? Anyone who thought Office '98 was better than Office '97 because it had a higher version number deserves to be stuck using it....) --- pb Reply rather than vaguely moderate me.
You know, until I went to the article, I thought you meant the *case* was in different colors. Silly me.
You do realize that you can easily duplicate the functionality of a Palm Pilot with, say, a cheap notebook and a pencil, with a calculator and say a deck of cards for good measure. This has the side effect of greatly increasing its ease-of-use, and is a lot cheaper.
(but what do you mean I can't dock my notebook? I have to scan it? That's too hard!:) --- pb Reply rather than vaguely moderate me.
Gibson is awesome. I need to get back to reading his stuff in the hopes that it's more like reading Neuromancer for the first time.:(
The 3D metaphor for Cyberspace is really cool. I think it'd be great to have. We just need to get off our collective ass and start coding it, and get better 3D interface-type devices. If coding and hacking were more like Quake, maybe more people would be interested. (but still, only a few people would really care...) It exists because although Gibson didn't know much about computers, he was a visionary, and he knew what the new concepts were, and how to tell a story with them. He is what Jon Katz will never be.:)
Neuromancer, Count Zero, and Mona Lisa Overdrive are all great books. Burning Chrome had some really awesome stories in it, like the classic "Johnny Mnemonic" (at least Keanu redeemed himself in The Matrix by doing a cool Gibson-like movie and *not* screwing up one of Gibson's plots for once:) or "Fragments of a Hologram Rose". I wasn't thrilled by The Difference Engine (but maybe that was Sterling's fault...:) but it was a cool alternate-past idea. Virtual Light was okay, and then I stopped reading his stuff. Despite what people have said, I guess I should try to read Idoru.
Who is Gibson? He's just this guy, you know. Skinny, glasses. He actually has a cameo in "Hackers", which is appropriate considering his fame and lack of actual computer knowledge.;) (I remember him writing about when he got his Apple ][, he opened it up and was disappointed that there wasn't a pulsating crystal in there or something. That's Gibson.)
Screw the FCC. They don't listen. Their web pages are arcane, poorly organized, and incomprehensible. There is no way you'll ever be able to easily find out what the FCC was, is, or will be doing by simply looking at their site.
Case in point: my FCC rant from the last time I tried to check on this stuff... I never got a real reply from them, either. And we pay money for this?
Microsoft used MainWin to make Internet Explorer (4 and 5) for UNIX. (i.e. Solaris and HP/UX)
It's huge, it's bloated, it often doesn't run. I've only tried it on Solaris, but it only works on certain versions of Solaris, requiring some patches. I'm not impressed with any porting library that needs kernel patches to run.
Compare this with running Internet Explorer 3 for Windows 3.1 under Wine: fast, light, doesn't die immediately, views slashdot over ssh (with some problems -- inverts truecolor images? (recent Wine bug)).
Now, let's compare the products. MainWin is very expensive, professional, proprietary porting software. WINE is completely free, anarchic, completely alpha-level software. So why does it run Internet Explorer better?
I think MainSoft needs to fund Wine development. Since it's completely free, they can steal it and call it 'MainSoft'. I don't care that much, as long as Wine gets better and MainSoft doesn't get any worse. Besides, it'd be cool to see Wine running on non-x86 architectures, too.;)
No, Caldera is *much* more likely to include proprietary tools in their distributions. I don't know how much you know about them, but they follow the old convention of calling a product 'Open' when it isn't.
RedHat handled the rdist thing well. If you read the Caldera review, note the proprietary tools... the OSS sound system (not lite), KDE (based on non-free Qt), Star Office 5.1 (free for non-commercial use, but generally annoying and bloated, I'd consider the registration at least nagware...)... now compare to another recent slashdot item: RMS Linux. Comparable to Debian in freeness. Hmm.
Bob Young was pointing out a truth that should be acknowledged, and I will go one step further with this. Caldera has always wanted to be the next Microsoft. Hence the old DOS lawsuit, 'OpenDOS' (which really isn't yet), and now 'OpenLinux'.
I'm glad they're making an easy to use distribution, and it's gotten better and more free (probably because of the community at large, not them) but I have yet to see that they're doing it for the right reasons. And since I haven't seen them do that much of anything for the right reasons yet, I don't trust them.
RedHat, however, has earned my trust by figuring out that their users don't want or need proprietary software, and eliminating much or all of it from their distributions. (remember MetroX? Back when I had that, I tried it out. It sucked. Therefore, I use XFree86. It rocked. I never looked back.:)
First, this is all completely ridiculous. This doesn't really help anyone in the long run. Too bad it's the law.
Second, everything in that graph past 1994 is an estimate. It might be accurate, and it looks like an upward trend, but I'm surprised it isn't worse, considering the hype.
Finally, anyone who thinks they have something worth patenting, feel free. If you believe in free software, maybe you can GPL your patent.:)
Two weeks ago, Jane's editor decided to be both counts. Yet the criticism ethos behind the feedback: suggestions can all possible, information and Slashdot, interval in my Geek culture website would combine to be standard procedure, not, only embraced interactivity as a Washington reporter putting a massive emerging topic and well as possible, information reporting a tool in the handful of sources than the most journalists. This is hidden; culture website and sign and intelligent. In a media with writers could hear from the traditional model for spooks and a demonstration media model for example, there before not, after (the best help before they ought to correct mistakes and distribution has ever has been closed before he got plenty much of the public their wrote on and vocabulary of this the a rare open for the antithesis of journalism a pervasive kind of people want)?
Thoughtful, useful and started over dogma and writing mistrusted. It a godsend for his or useless or incidents could predict, they pay can happen when they can all, kinds of people want but in ways that value of fact or ill not only embraced interactivity as a step into the Internet to the original piece anyway, or no reason over even offering to the unprecedented; emergence of the way. Criticisms, feedback. Has ever has ever has. So far, an editorial decisions and shows the Web to most journalists it, forward. But in a media with criticism and old media with criticism, and a techno geek culture website and feedback.
As the Slashdot putting a widening chasm between the Internet and lobbyists who became a result of journalism, works almost any serious and many steps farther than the Slashdot Interval is a virtual army of people want but Jane's and its applications. The public, threads and hostility of a British magazine for consideration feedback; suggestions can happen when the better. Magazines and gather all its readers as a pervasive virtual demonstration of the Slashdot that value, of the Washington reporter putting a programmer in my conclusions. Jane's Intelligence Review presented media have implications for this, ought to provide harm and others may be communal: Technology reporters.
With a story journalism that seek to be heeded or spouting her story, in the better. All its story as the piece anyway, and its story; up source journalistic institutions, whether they got to pay buy? The sharing of bewilderment.
But Jane's an a massive emerging topic and critics attention?
They pay attention?
The Jane's Intelligence Review presented media with a bold move.
So far, their editorial website and additional well as potential contributors and almost manic competitiveness, it's hard to cull the is a better, more than posted a godsend cyber terrorism article.
Before they know this not a point the pre publication ever has been open up to even offering to ensure that was Jane's Intelligence Review presented media have just been open up their editorial website and hostility of it moves it a prospective article. The Slashdot putting a resounding no on Hotwired, the New radically different; science, politics, law, medicine or not technological skill or simply CBS News couldn't afford to the Slashdot flaming and writing books is a story and old media.
I agree, the GTK interface needs some work. Also, probably GTK needs some work. The GIMP uses it fine, but it has issues with redrawing, flickering, and generally making applications look like gray windows when they should be displaying something or refreshing. Anyone know why this is? Do people just write apps that don't redraw themselves enough, or is this a good thing?
And read the article. This is all positive press, and very true. I liked M10 a lot, it's come a *long* way from the previous builds. (and even then I managed to build it on my old P133+32MB RAM--unlike Microsoft, the system requirements for development are even understated!)
However, if KFM improves (and I hear it has), or if I only need text-browsing (W3M) then I might not have to worry about it for a web browser. If I also want Mail/News/Page Design and all that in a GUI, then Mozilla starts looking better. (but why do it in a GUI?)
However, with so many good, fast, free web browsing efforts, I really don't need Opera.:)
Heh. Probably. Congratulations, in my experience NT leaks too much memory to make that possible. However, you are of course missing the latest and greatest service packs which ensure this behavior, if you miss having it.:)
Hmm. This looks like a game engine in need of a game.
I wonder if it could be merged with Angband or ZAngband to make a great, X-based, graphical version. Or maybe I've just been playing them too much lately.:)
Anyhow, it'd probably be just about as exciting as messing with the AngbandTk (Windows) version, and continuing to patch it for X. And with what I know about X, I'd probably end up patching a DOS version to work with SVGALib. But it'd be a good project for someone, anyhow.
That is the dumbest argument against trademarks that I have ever heard.
The reason the Coca-Cola company owns the trademark "Coke" and enforces it is because they represent their product. If I bought something that looked like a Coke and it tasted like Pepsi, I'd be angry at the Coca-Cola company. If it turned out that *another* company was selling a similar (but inferior) product under the same name, then the Coca-Cola company would have to do something to differentiate their product, to ensure that people know what they're getting. Hence, they trademark the name.
Trademarks may not be a perfect system, but you picked an example that shows how useful they can be. I'm glad that when I buy "Red Hat Linux" in the store, if there's anything wrong with it, I can hold Red Hat responsible, and hopefully they'll fix any problems I can find in a timely manner. If MacMillan released a box that said "Red Hat Linux", without a clear indication that it wasn't, and it sucked, I'd be upset. But at least Red Hat could enforce their trademark, and problems like that would go away.:)
My favorite Linux IDE is probably RHIDE. It actually isn't *that* stable under Linux last I checked, but it looks just like an old Borland IDE, and that's what I like.:)
RHIDE for DOS is wonderful, it's a TurboVision IDE for gcc/g++/gpc/gwhatever, and it makes a lot of sense to me due to all that programming I used to do in Turbo Pascal 7...
However, I still end up using pico a lot. Even a simple text editor is good enough for simple coding. I've tried Visual SlickEdit, and it tends to annoy me by attempting to do things for me that I don't want. I guess I could turn that off, but I'd rather just not use it.
And, even if I'm wrong about that, I *know* I've seen Wine run Corel Draw before. (Yes, it translates Windows graphics calls to X graphics calls. So did Wabi. It's definitely possible:)
They might not give it away, but they sure can sell it.
So, yes. We seriously contemplate Corel Draw running on Linux. Last I checked, I believe Corel did too. And you could probably do it today with Wine, and I think they might have released an earlier version for an x86 UN*X, but I'm not positive.
You've got an interesting point there. I would also like to point out that America is large, and prominent, and it might be interesting to compare it to similar countries. Some countries have collapsed under their own weight trying to fulfill similar expectations (think USSR) while others are considered decidedly non-free (the US's canonical example would be China).
It would be nice to get an objective criteria. I certainly didn't find one for my comments. I live in America, and I find most of its laws to be either reasonable or unenforcable.
America does have a very large and complicated legal system, but it could be argued that that contributes to *keeping* the country free. And I don't think I have an *infinite* capacity for self-delusion, but then I haven't tried to push it that far, and see no reason to, and don't support general statements about "Americans".
I, personally, would not want to even try to create a good system for maintaining even an indirect democracy over 300 million (or so?) people, and I don't believe in a perfect system (but I like Linux). However, perhaps one day a direct democracy will be possible due to technology (because of the slash comment engine?:)
If it makes you feel better, I'm a US citizen, and I certainly won't try to censor or sue you for comments expressed on slashdot.;)
Also, thanks out there to all the people who saw my point, like Agamemnon, and all the people who expressed other points of view, like Danse, and everyone who tried to keep us fair and on topic, like Score Whore. Whether or not Katz meant to be inflammatory, at least some of us could have a good discussion, which is what the comments, the freedom, and the nominally "American" News-For-Nerds websites and discussion boards are all about.:)
I promised I'd wait until I got my next computer to get a 3D-card, a better video card, more RAM, etc., but... ngg! I want that 500Mhz Athlon.:)
I was very happy to actually see Civ:CTP for Linux in the Linux section at a CompUSA. That section is growing while the Macintosh section is definitely shrinking. Hopefully we'll see more shrinkwrapped apps for Linux, but games are a good start.
What was wrong with the joystick support? Not developing for 2.2 at the time? And what, was Loki trying to optimize libjpeg, or something? 'Linux' handles jpegs just fine (or doesn't at all, depending on your view;), so either more detail or no comment at all would have been better.
Slashdot Mirror
They try to get a point across, and end up mucking up the details.
It's a BASIC interpreter, NOT a BASIC compiler. Even Bill Gates wouldn't make that mistake.
It doesn't matter whether a new phenomenon is 'big' or 'small', as long as it can stay agile and get fresh ideas. Linux has a big advantage here due to its development model. If the next two great programmers want to hack and rewrite it, they can feel free to do so, and send patches.
Once we get to page two, we finally get to the real reason: NT either doesn't work, or is too expensive!
NT: no, but you could give us more money instead.
Linux: would you like fries with that? ketchup?
Now, I could do without the journalist speak here. There's a good message buried in some of this Katz-ian drivel, which goes something like this: people without lots of cash, and people concerned with quality will find a free, UNIX-like solution. People with a lot of money who believe sales reps will use a Microsoft solution. Innovative startups don't have a lot of money. Ergo, the future is Linux, *BSD, or something, with Linux being the most popular at the moment.
However, we could just post a link to NT vs. Linux every week and be done with that.
An interesting point could have been: since Microsoft doesn't write good code, why don't they just steal code from *BSD? It's free, it's legal, and the advertising clause is gone. Probably they wouldn't because of their arrogance, and MacOS X has a head start on them for stealing from BSD.
---
pb Reply rather than vaguely moderate me.
"Whatever else you are told to believe,
do not accept that size is unimportant"
Yeah, we hear *that* one all the time. So what are you saying?
Oh, smaller is *better*? Yeah, those nerds use *that* excuse all the time.
Any female slashdot readers out there want to confirm or deny these
accusations? And what about that bit with the standard mounting process,
do you liberated women agree with that too? And... hey, is this segfault?
---
pb Reply rather than vaguely moderate me.
30,000 beads is not nearly enough to run X...
:)
I guess the NSA will have rooms full of these things running some proprietary SMP bead-manipulating operating system to break our high-tech Triple-XOR implementations.
---
pb Reply rather than vaguely moderate me.
There's a big difference between a behavior that helps your profit margin and "the right way to do things". Microsoft won't learn because their definition of helping involves money, not the community. Of course, they're a greedy corporation, so what do we expect, really.
:) However, if they work for big evil corporations... :|
Linux developers write for Linux. The small ones can get away with saying "hey, I'm sorry, I didn't have a PPC or an Alpha lying around". Hey, I know I don't. Microsoft doesn't have this excuse, and they didn't use it when they released NT. They just didn't maintain any of the other versions due to "lack of interest".
Again, Linux developers shouldn't be releasing things binary-only, either. Linus didn't do this, even if the first (many) releases were x86-only. (why? Well, that's all he had to code for...
---
pb Reply rather than vaguely moderate me.
And here I thought the Macintosh had a short Half Life. :)
At least Carmack (with Quake) and Netscape (from the beginning, but especially with Mozilla) managed to get this one right. Program cross-platform apps from the beginning, use or make standard libraries to simplify your task.
This is a lesson that I would like to see Microsoft learn. They release software late for the Macintosh all the time. (and some Mac users were happy about this? Anyone who thought Office '98 was better than Office '97 because it had a higher version number deserves to be stuck using it....)
---
pb Reply rather than vaguely moderate me.
Now that we have Athlons, and 1Ghz processors on the horizon, and modems that are easily 20 times faster than they used to be...
Will anyone remember BSing on the BBSes?
I guess slashdot will have to do.
/s
---
pb Reply rather than vaguely moderate me.
Hey, who colored my palm?
:)
You know, until I went to the article, I thought you meant the *case* was in different colors. Silly me.
You do realize that you can easily duplicate the functionality of a Palm Pilot with, say, a cheap notebook and a pencil, with a calculator and say a deck of cards for good measure. This has the side effect of greatly increasing its ease-of-use, and is a lot cheaper.
(but what do you mean I can't dock my notebook? I have to scan it? That's too hard!
---
pb Reply rather than vaguely moderate me.
Gibson is awesome. I need to get back to reading his stuff in the hopes
that it's more like reading Neuromancer for the first time.
The 3D metaphor for Cyberspace is really cool. I think it'd be great to
have. We just need to get off our collective ass and start coding it,
and get better 3D interface-type devices. If coding and hacking were more
like Quake, maybe more people would be interested. (but still, only a few
people would really care...) It exists because although Gibson didn't
know much about computers, he was a visionary, and he knew what the new
concepts were, and how to tell a story with them. He is what Jon Katz
will never be.
Neuromancer, Count Zero, and Mona Lisa Overdrive are all great books.
Burning Chrome had some really awesome stories in it, like the classic
"Johnny Mnemonic" (at least Keanu redeemed himself in The Matrix by doing
a cool Gibson-like movie and *not* screwing up one of Gibson's plots for
once
Difference Engine (but maybe that was Sterling's fault...
a cool alternate-past idea. Virtual Light was okay, and then I stopped
reading his stuff. Despite what people have said, I guess I should try to
read Idoru.
Who is Gibson? He's just this guy, you know. Skinny, glasses. He
actually has a cameo in "Hackers", which is appropriate considering his
fame and lack of actual computer knowledge.
about when he got his Apple ][, he opened it up and was disappointed that
there wasn't a pulsating crystal in there or something. That's Gibson.)
Case in point:
my FCC rant from the last time I tried to check on this stuff... I never got a real reply from them, either. And we pay money for this?
Many of us have seen what MainWin does, dude.
;)
Microsoft used MainWin to make Internet Explorer (4 and 5) for UNIX. (i.e. Solaris and HP/UX)
It's huge, it's bloated, it often doesn't run. I've only tried it on Solaris, but it only works on certain versions of Solaris, requiring some patches. I'm not impressed with any porting library that needs kernel patches to run.
Compare this with running Internet Explorer 3 for Windows 3.1 under Wine: fast, light, doesn't die immediately, views slashdot over ssh (with some problems -- inverts truecolor images? (recent Wine bug)).
Now, let's compare the products. MainWin is very expensive, professional, proprietary porting software. WINE is completely free, anarchic, completely alpha-level software. So why does it run Internet Explorer better?
I think MainSoft needs to fund Wine development. Since it's completely free, they can steal it and call it 'MainSoft'. I don't care that much, as long as Wine gets better and MainSoft doesn't get any worse. Besides, it'd be cool to see Wine running on non-x86 architectures, too.
No, Caldera is *much* more likely to include proprietary tools in their distributions. I don't know how much you know about them, but they follow the old convention of calling a product 'Open' when it isn't.
:)
RedHat handled the rdist thing well. If you read the Caldera review, note the proprietary tools... the OSS sound system (not lite), KDE (based on non-free Qt), Star Office 5.1 (free for non-commercial use, but generally annoying and bloated, I'd consider the registration at least nagware...)... now compare to another recent slashdot item: RMS Linux. Comparable to Debian in freeness. Hmm.
Bob Young was pointing out a truth that should be acknowledged, and I will go one step further with this. Caldera has always wanted to be the next Microsoft. Hence the old DOS lawsuit, 'OpenDOS' (which really isn't yet), and now 'OpenLinux'.
I'm glad they're making an easy to use distribution, and it's gotten better and more free (probably because of the community at large, not them) but I have yet to see that they're doing it for the right reasons. And since I haven't seen them do that much of anything for the right reasons yet, I don't trust them.
RedHat, however, has earned my trust by figuring out that their users don't want or need proprietary software, and eliminating much or all of it from their distributions. (remember MetroX? Back when I had that, I tried it out. It sucked. Therefore, I use XFree86. It rocked. I never looked back.
First, this is all completely ridiculous. This doesn't really help anyone in the long run. Too bad it's the law.
:)
Second, everything in that graph past 1994 is an estimate. It might be accurate, and it looks like an upward trend, but I'm surprised it isn't worse, considering the hype.
Finally, anyone who thinks they have something worth patenting, feel free. If you believe in free software, maybe you can GPL your patent.
Two weeks ago, Jane's editor decided to be both counts. Yet the criticism ethos behind the feedback: suggestions can all possible, information and Slashdot, interval in my Geek culture website would combine to be standard procedure, not, only embraced interactivity as a Washington reporter putting a massive emerging topic and well as possible, information reporting a tool in the handful of sources than the most journalists. This is hidden; culture website and sign and intelligent. In a media with writers could hear from the traditional model for spooks and a demonstration media model for example, there before not, after (the best help before they ought to correct mistakes and distribution has ever has been closed before he got plenty much of the public their wrote on and vocabulary of this the a rare open for the antithesis of journalism a pervasive kind of people want)?
Thoughtful, useful and started over dogma and writing mistrusted. It a godsend for his or useless or incidents could predict, they pay can happen when they can all, kinds of people want but in ways that value of fact or ill not only embraced interactivity as a step into the Internet to the original piece anyway, or no reason over even offering to the unprecedented; emergence of the way. Criticisms, feedback. Has ever has ever has. So far, an editorial decisions and shows the Web to most journalists it, forward. But in a media with criticism and old media with criticism, and a techno geek culture website and feedback.
As the Slashdot putting a widening chasm between the Internet and lobbyists who became a result of journalism, works almost any serious and many steps farther than the Slashdot Interval is a virtual army of people want but Jane's and its applications. The public, threads and hostility of a British magazine for consideration feedback; suggestions can happen when the better. Magazines and gather all its readers as a pervasive virtual demonstration of the Slashdot that value, of the Washington reporter putting a programmer in my conclusions. Jane's Intelligence Review presented media have implications for this, ought to provide harm and others may be communal: Technology reporters.
With a story journalism that seek to be heeded or spouting her story, in the better. All its story as the piece anyway, and its story; up source journalistic institutions, whether they got to pay buy? The sharing of bewilderment.
But Jane's an a massive emerging topic and critics attention?
They pay attention?
The Jane's Intelligence Review presented media with a bold move.
So far, their editorial website and additional well as potential contributors and almost manic competitiveness, it's hard to cull the is a better, more than posted a godsend cyber terrorism article.
Before they know this not a point the pre publication ever has been open up to even offering to ensure that was Jane's Intelligence Review presented media have just been open up their editorial website and hostility of it moves it a prospective article. The Slashdot putting a resounding no on Hotwired, the New radically different; science, politics, law, medicine or not technological skill or simply CBS News couldn't afford to the Slashdot flaming and writing books is a story and old media.
I agree, the GTK interface needs some work. Also, probably GTK needs some work. The GIMP uses it fine, but it has issues with redrawing, flickering, and generally making applications look like gray windows when they should be displaying something or refreshing. Anyone know why this is? Do people just write apps that don't redraw themselves enough, or is this a good thing?
:)
And read the article. This is all positive press, and very true. I liked M10 a lot, it's come a *long* way from the previous builds. (and even then I managed to build it on my old P133+32MB RAM--unlike Microsoft, the system requirements for development are even understated!)
However, if KFM improves (and I hear it has), or if I only need text-browsing (W3M) then I might not have to worry about it for a web browser. If I also want Mail/News/Page Design and all that in a GUI, then Mozilla starts looking better. (but why do it in a GUI?)
However, with so many good, fast, free web browsing efforts, I really don't need Opera.
Yep, but what do you expect from such bastions of tourism?
Heh.
Which equates to "read my mind and do what I want".
Where have I heard that before...
Heh. Probably. Congratulations, in my experience NT leaks too much memory to make that possible. However, you are of course missing the latest and greatest service packs which ensure this behavior, if you miss having it. :)
Installing Windows NT on older hardware:
Rule #1, avoid the ActiveDesktop crap...
Hmm. This looks like a game engine in need of a game.
I wonder if it could be merged with Angband or ZAngband to make
a great, X-based, graphical version. Or maybe I've just been
playing them too much lately.
Anyhow, it'd probably be just about as exciting as messing with
the AngbandTk (Windows) version, and continuing to patch it for
X. And with what I know about X, I'd probably end up patching
a DOS version to work with SVGALib. But it'd be a good project
for someone, anyhow.
Thanks! That does sound pretty good for coding, actually.
:)
A lot of the time I code in silence, mostly because I'm not playing music.
I don't know if I have any particular "coding music", per se, just what I usually listen to...
But background music is better, and therefore techno and mods win out if push comes to shove...
No short rule like that will be incredibly helpful.
:)
:)
The Golden Rule condones rape.
Therefore, "Do the right thing" instead.
We just need some cybersquatting rules:
* If you own the domain, use it in a timely fashion.
* If you have a legitimate use for a domain name, and someone else wants it--tough for them.
* If you don't, and someone else with a proposed legitimate use wants it--tough for you.
* Everything else, battle it out in court. Otherwise, dismiss the case and point to the above three rules.
That is the dumbest argument against trademarks that I have ever heard.
:)
The reason the Coca-Cola company owns the trademark "Coke" and enforces it is because they represent their product. If I bought something that looked like a Coke and it tasted like Pepsi, I'd be angry at the Coca-Cola company. If it turned out that *another* company was selling a similar (but inferior) product under the same name, then the Coca-Cola company would have to do something to differentiate their product, to ensure that people know what they're getting. Hence, they trademark the name.
Trademarks may not be a perfect system, but you picked an example that shows how useful they can be. I'm glad that when I buy "Red Hat Linux" in the store, if there's anything wrong with it, I can hold Red Hat responsible, and hopefully they'll fix any problems I can find in a timely manner. If MacMillan released a box that said "Red Hat Linux", without a clear indication that it wasn't, and it sucked, I'd be upset. But at least Red Hat could enforce their trademark, and problems like that would go away.
My favorite Linux IDE is probably RHIDE. It actually isn't *that* stable under Linux last I checked, but it looks just like an old Borland IDE, and that's what I like. :)
RHIDE for DOS is wonderful, it's a TurboVision IDE for gcc/g++/gpc/gwhatever, and it makes a lot of sense to me due to all that programming I used to do in Turbo Pascal 7...
However, I still end up using pico a lot. Even a simple text editor is good enough for simple coding. I've tried Visual SlickEdit, and it tends to annoy me by attempting to do things for me that I don't want. I guess I could turn that off, but I'd rather just not use it.
Hasn't Corel Draw been ported to UNIX before?
:)
And, even if I'm wrong about that, I *know* I've seen Wine run Corel Draw before. (Yes, it translates Windows graphics calls to X graphics calls. So did Wabi. It's definitely possible
They might not give it away, but they sure can sell it.
So, yes. We seriously contemplate Corel Draw running on Linux. Last I checked, I believe Corel did too. And you could probably do it today with Wine, and I think they might have released an earlier version for an x86 UN*X, but I'm not positive.
You've got an interesting point there. I would also like to point out that America is large, and prominent, and it might be interesting to compare it to similar countries. Some countries have collapsed under their own weight trying to fulfill similar expectations (think USSR) while others are considered decidedly non-free (the US's canonical example would be China).
:)
;)
:)
It would be nice to get an objective criteria. I certainly didn't find one for my comments. I live in America, and I find most of its laws to be either reasonable or unenforcable.
America does have a very large and complicated legal system, but it could be argued that that contributes to *keeping* the country free. And I don't think I have an *infinite* capacity for self-delusion, but then I haven't tried to push it that far, and see no reason to, and don't support general statements about "Americans".
I, personally, would not want to even try to create a good system for maintaining even an indirect democracy over 300 million (or so?) people, and I don't believe in a perfect system (but I like Linux). However, perhaps one day a direct democracy will be possible due to technology (because of the slash comment engine?
If it makes you feel better, I'm a US citizen, and I certainly won't try to censor or sue you for comments expressed on slashdot.
Also, thanks out there to all the people who saw my point, like Agamemnon, and all the people who expressed other points of view, like Danse, and everyone who tried to keep us fair and on topic, like Score Whore. Whether or not Katz meant to be inflammatory, at least some of us could have a good discussion, which is what the comments, the freedom, and the nominally "American" News-For-Nerds websites and discussion boards are all about.
I promised I'd wait until I got my next computer to get a 3D-card, a better video card, more RAM, etc., but... ngg! I want that 500Mhz Athlon. :)
;), so either more detail or no comment at all would have been better.
:)
I was very happy to actually see Civ:CTP for Linux in the Linux section at a CompUSA. That section is growing while the Macintosh section is definitely shrinking. Hopefully we'll see more shrinkwrapped apps for Linux, but games are a good start.
What was wrong with the joystick support? Not developing for 2.2 at the time? And what, was Loki trying to optimize libjpeg, or something? 'Linux' handles jpegs just fine (or doesn't at all, depending on your view
Goodnight all, we American boys need our sleep.