CEO of a company that fired 10,000 people last year and lost $5 billion? Earn a severance package of $100 million. Gamble with other people's money on the market and send $500 billion up in smoke? Get a $2 million bonus.
Then it is upto the share holders to act.
The occupiers like to whine about CEOs being paid large salaries. But that money doesn't belong to the occupiers in the first place, corporations have the right to do what they like with that money, it is upto the investors to hold them to account. Not some third party of squatters.
Putting up your own unencrypted access point under your desk is not a good idea for security. I've had to deal with this before.
Things like that should be sackable offences. I don't know what surprises me more, the fact that people do it in the first place or the fact that they are surprised to get caught. It's like they believe no one is watching.
Don't be so quick to damn youtube with the others--there are many instructional/informational videos that can be work related--depending of course what job you are trying to do.
Oh yea, and don't forget bit-torrent is only for Linux builds; right?
The poor who don't want to immunize will be forced to due to financial considerations.
If they are taking from the community in the form of welfare then it's only fair that they give something back, herd immunity is a good way to do that. It's cheap too.
Slashdot Mirror
Anonymous = dozens or hundreds of people
Middle class = hundreds of millions of people.
Middle class = the top 1% of the worlds wealthiest people.
A large portion of the worlds population don't have enough food.
CEO of a company that fired 10,000 people last year and lost $5 billion? Earn a severance package of $100 million. Gamble with other people's money on the market and send $500 billion up in smoke? Get a $2 million bonus.
Then it is upto the share holders to act.
The occupiers like to whine about CEOs being paid large salaries. But that money doesn't belong to the occupiers in the first place, corporations have the right to do what they like with that money, it is upto the investors to hold them to account. Not some third party of squatters.
Anonymous has always taken victims wherever they find them. This is nothing new.
So I am not sure why this hacker group would even entertain a pathetic thought of calling themselves Robin Hoods.
Because they have an ego to feed.
I hate IM's because people assume you're there and available for chat. It's the same with the phone.
Putting up your own unencrypted access point under your desk is not a good idea for security. I've had to deal with this before.
Things like that should be sackable offences. I don't know what surprises me more, the fact that people do it in the first place or the fact that they are surprised to get caught. It's like they believe no one is watching.
Don't be so quick to damn youtube with the others--there are many instructional/informational videos that can be work related--depending of course what job you are trying to do.
Oh yea, and don't forget bit-torrent is only for Linux builds; right?
The first website I ever wrote was in word. I think it was the mid to late 90s.
They aren't illegal in China. The United States has gone beyond it's jurisdiction to shut down foreign owned and operated websites.
They didn't use any US TLD. These where .com's
These are .com not .us that are being seized.
17NflShop.com appears to be using a Chinese registrar.
Who are you to declare what someone should or shouldn't sell?
The poor who don't want to immunize will be forced to due to financial considerations.
If they are taking from the community in the form of welfare then it's only fair that they give something back, herd immunity is a good way to do that. It's cheap too.
Would that be the "rights" to a free-income courtesy of the tax payer.
Or the robots may locate an inmate bleeding on the floor before a foot patrol passes. This could also shorten the response time.
It also explains why the furniture in a supermax isn't movable.
Because prisoners beat each other with it?
Absolutely, the sooner we go 100% nuclear the better. The scaremongering from the greenies is holding humanity back.
No they don't. No one is obligated to pay $200 but if you want something then you have to pay the asking price.
Plus the huge infrastructure required to operate the domain registries. They are an ongoing expense.
They seem to be doing a pretty decent job so far.
Because the ruling cannot be followed without breaking a contract with Facebook.
I know people who refuse to deal with Hotmail users as a result.
The reason they do it is to cut down on spam complaints from their end user.
It just means allot of people just cannot send email to hotmail.
Ah, here's a timeline of some of them.
http://s3.amazonaws.com/files.posterous.com/temp-2010-04-08/aDzkirxbtcecJBvvbzedhAfFrhqbmDoEljobCluCsJitBdGFjbHHoqtAJoAy/hotmail-logos.jpg.scaled500.jpg?AWSAccessKeyId=AKIAJFZAE65UYRT34AOQ&Expires=1320411943&Signature=0JO6aC%2B5SPHWYHeHfyyMiB0sDSI%3D
that's a long link.
Care to clarify?
I liked their old logo: http://s3.danscomp.net/hotmail_logo.gif