Slashdot Mirror


User: jasoegaard

jasoegaard's activity in the archive.

Stories
0
Comments
36
First seen
Last seen
Profile
(view on slashdot.org)

Comments · 36

  1. Funny ending on VMware Signs Deal with Microsoft · · Score: 1

    Did you notice the ending of the press release ?

    First came an "About VMware" then followed an "About Microsoft".

    Who doesn't know Microsoft ? :-)

  2. Re:Why is this rated as funny? on The Short Life And Hard Times Of A Linux Virus · · Score: 1

    I don't get it, why on earth is the above rated as funny? The link

    http://www.big.net.au/~silvio

    he gives, contains a lot of information concerning virusses on Unices.

  3. Re:i don't get it on Biting The Bullet: Publishing And The Net · · Score: 1

    Katz is right. It is about attitude.

    Online you could fetch the GlassBook-Edition. If you signed up for the email waiting list, you could get it in postscript or pdf - so I did.

    Was I disappointed, when I discovered, that I the email I received, only contained a link to a GlassBook Edition?

    If they only want to give the GlassBoo Edition away, it is okay, but they should not fool the customers into believing they can versions that they can actually read.

    I for one felt cheated.

  4. Why the empty product equals 1 on Grok Goldbach, Grab Gold · · Score: 1

    First of all, the empty product equals 1 by _convention_. But of course you do not make convention out of the blue. Here is the reason that the empty product equals one:

    The following is true for positive n and m:

    (a*...*a) * (a*...*a) = a*...*a (+)

    The parenthesises contains n, m and m+n a-s respectively.

    [Damn, /. eats all my white space. (I can not write n, m and m+n the proper places.)]

    or written using powers:

    a^n a^m = a^(n+m) (++)

    Now in math we to extend the symbol a^n to the case n=0. Thus we need to give a^0 a value (compare this to (+), the value a^0 is the value of the empty product).

    We would like equation (++) to stay true, so we have to require:

    a^0 a^m = a^(0+m) = a^m

    Thus a^0 _have to_ be 1.

    If we formulate it this way:

    The empty product equals the neutral element of multiplication.

    Then it is clear that the empty sum must equal 0, as 0 is the neutral element of addition.

  5. The Miraculous Baily-Borwein-Plouffe Pi Algorithm on Happy Pi Day! · · Score: 2

    Happy pi day.

    This is the perfect occasion to spread the message of

    The Miraculous Baily-Borwein-Plouffe Pi Algorithm

    It is an algorithm to compute the n'th digit of Pi in any base, in
    particular it is possible to compute the n'th decimal digit without
    having to compute the n-1 first digits. This is a truly amazing
    result. We know that pi is irrational (Euler) and that pi is
    trancedental (Lindemann, 1982) and thus is highly irregular. That the
    n'th digit of pi is computable is therefore very surprising. There are
    only a countable number of computer algorithms and thus there are only
    countable any numbers that have the property that their n'th number is
    computable.

    On "Fabrice Bellard's Pi Page":

    http://www-stud.enst.fr/~bellard/pi/index.html#bin ary

    one can find an article that explains the algorithm together with an
    implementaion in c (two pages long). The remarkable thing is that the
    algorithm uses only normal integers and doubles. That is, one need not
    implement arbitrary precision arithmetic.

    The algorithm is new, 1996. In another thread the corresponding
    program is shown for base 16, but I much prefer the base 10 version
    :-)

    References:

    The original article concerning base 10 is

    "On the computation of the n'th decimal digit of various
    transcendental numbers." by Simon Plouffe, November 30, 1996.

    and can be found at

    http://www.lacim.uqam.ca/plouffe/Simon/articlepi.h tml

    History:

    A very readable account of the history of computations of pi is the

    "The quest for pi by Bailey, Plouffe and the Borweins." this can be
    found at

    http://www.lacim.uqam.ca/plouffe/Simon/TheQuestfor Pi.pdf

    Here they also answer why it is fun to compute many digits of pi. In
    the beginning the mathematicians wanted to know many digits of pi to
    find out whether pi was irrational or not. Euler showed that pi was
    irrational (the proof is not that hard). Later Lindemann in 1882
    showed that pi was trancedental, that is pi is root in no polynomial
    with integer coefficents. Today it is customary to compute many digits
    of pi on new super computers. In 1982 sun (?) actually found some
    obscure hardware bug due to a pi program.

    --
    Jens Axel Søgaard -- http://www.jasoegaard.dk

    A Mathematician is a machine for turning coffee into theorems.
    - Paul Erdös

  6. Vapor ware on Rumblings of MS Office for Linux at CeBIT · · Score: 1

    Isn't this the old trick from the Microsoft public relation department?

    They deliberately put out the rumour, that they are going to port Office to Linux - the rumour has the effect that no other companies start to port their word processors, since they know they can not beat Word.

    The net result is that Linux-opponents still can argue: "Linux does not have any real word processors".

    Off course I could be overly pessimistic. If it on the other hand is true, that they are porting Word - I will say "Thanks, that's just what Linux needed.".

    --
    A mathematician is a device for turning coffee into theorems. -- P. Erdos

  7. Re: To prevent uploading cartels on Security Analysis of My.MP3.com and Beam-It Protocol · · Score: 1

    It is reasonable that a user beams CDs from a very limited number of machines, since he must beam his CDs from home.

    My guess is therefore, that an account gets blocked if CDs are beamed from several machines. In this way I can not go visit all my friends and beam their CD-collections to my account.

    Another thing is accessing the same account from several machines at once. Although some say they don't block it now, it doesn't mean that they won't block it in the future.

  8. The BB Demo made my day on Textmode Quake · · Score: 1

    Subject says it all.

  9. Re:I prefer hardware decoding on XMMS 1.0.0 Released · · Score: 1

    The price is $99 - a little expensive I think.

  10. Re:The importance of beeing Ernest. on Jon Johansen on ABC World News Tonight · · Score: 1

    Translation of the post post script:

    Jon: If you are reading, then have good luck, but do not come here and day that you did it all alone, that is too dumb.

  11. Gauss was first (1805) - History and ref. here... on IDCT Approximation: Worth a Patent? · · Score: 2

    Claimed... :-) I think he is right. A 5 min search using google lead
    me to

    http://www.jjj.de/fxt/fftnote.txt ,

    which contains "Notes on the FFT" written by C. S. Burrus.

    The note gives a thorough presentation of the FFT algorithm starting
    with Gauss /Cooley-Tukey and up to now, where efforts are made to
    discover a parallel algorithm. The first paragraph of text follows
    below, wherin [1] is the reference:

    [1] M. T. Heideman, D. H. Johnson, and C. S. Burrus,
    "Gauss and the history of the FFT," IEEE Acoustics, Speech,
    and Signal Processing Magazine, vol. 1, pp. 14-21, October 1984.
    also in IEEE Press FFT Reprints, by P. Duhamel, 1995.


    This is a note describing results on efficient algorithms to calculate
    the discrete Fourier transform (DFT). The purpose is to report work
    done at Rice University, but other contributions used by the DSP
    research group at Rice are also cited. Perhaps the most interesting
    is the discovery that the Cooley-Tukey FFT was described by Gauss in
    1805 [1]. That gives some indication of the age of research on the
    topic, and the fact that a recently compiled bibliography [2] on
    efficient algorithms contains over 3400 entries indicates its volume.
    An expanded version of this bibliography is published as a book [2]
    with the references in a data base on a disk. Four IEEE Press reprint
    books contain papers on the FFT [3,4,5,6].