Slashdot Mirror


XMMS 1.0.0 Released

Olle Hällnäs wrote in to tell us that XMMS (the premiere GUI MP3 player for Linux these days) has released v1.1.0. Currently they only have rpms and source on the Web site, but I'm sure debs will follow. I've attached a feature list if you read more.
  • CD Plugin now supports CDDB, and CD Index.
  • mpg123 plugin now handles compressed id3 frames.
  • OSS plugin got a much better and faster resampling routine.
  • Setting for adjusting master volume instead of pcm volume.
  • New shortkey, ctrl-n for "No Playlist Advance"
  • XMMS can now be made "sticky"
  • The Equalizer and Playlist don't show up in GNOME/KDE's task list anymore.
  • Reload skin shortkey (F5)
  • Option to set the speed of the mousewheel.
  • Playlist files are now tried to be recognized by content in addition to suffix.
  • Added Fullscreen support for visualization plugins. (in libxmms)
  • Added DGA support to fullscreen.
  • Added xmms-config command.
  • XMMS now handles winamp's .wsz skin files.

122 comments

  1. Re:Skins are NOT themes.. by spathi · · Score: 2

    If you have a read through the xmms forums you will find that the xmms crew are going to start work on a new skin/theme format simmilar to Kjofol, but more powerful, this may be what youre after :)

    --
    -- spathi.net: My Corner of the Universe
  2. Re:Sound Blaster Live! Question by Menthos · · Score: 1
    Check that you have the correct output plugin selected in xmms.
    I'f you're using Gnome, chances are that you already have the Enlightenment sound deamon (esd) up and running. In that case use the ESD plugin (if it isn't there, install the xmms-esd package. If it doesn't work with ESD try the OSD output plugin. Should work in KDE.

    --

    GNU/Linux. The Freshmaker.

  3. Re:Skins are NOT themes.. by DaKrushr · · Score: 1

    What about GQMpeg? That support real 'themes'...

  4. Re:A strange bug... by Deadbolt · · Score: 1

    I saw something very similar. I'm running Red Hat 6.1 on an Intel and was using the 0.9.5 version of XMMS. Now I can't play my mp3s. I can't work w/o me mp3s! Help!

    --
    "Honey, it's not working out; I think we should make our relationship open-source."
  5. Re:Beware by SendBot · · Score: 1

    My specific problem is that it couldn't find the configure thingy for mikmod. I was hoping to be able to recycle the previous libs, but it didn't quite work out. Actually, I copied some wraper thingy over and it bitched about not being able to find a bunch of .o's. oops :)

  6. I hardly ever use xmms by heroine · · Score: 2

    I used to use GQMpeg back when xmms crashed every 5 minutes. Then I used xmms briefly to listen to shoutcast, but never had a use for the visualization plugins. My biggest quandary was the number of buttons which give no indication of their function. Now I use Broadcast 2000 for everything. It's big and overkill but it's easy to use.

  7. Use mpg123 anyway... by Telcontar · · Score: 2

    Generally, I only use xmms for show. mpg123 is *so* much more convenient.
    First, run
    find /mp3 -name '*.mp3' >/usr/local/share/mp3list
    (adjust the path if needed). Then, you only need to run
    mpg123 -Z -@ /usr/local/share/mp3list
    to run your jukebox which plays all your MP3s randomly! If you never play games, you can even add the second line to /etc/rc.d/rclocal :-)
    Note: you could use the result of find(1) directly in conjunction with xargs(1), but if you file list does not change to often, saving it to a file is faster.

    1. Re:Use mpg123 anyway... by technos · · Score: 2

      You can do the same thing in XMMS, at least you can with the early 0.9 I'm still using. (it works! Why replace it!) Then just load it up as a playlist, and you're good to go!

      --
      .sig: Now legally binding!
  8. Re:it's 0% for me by Bagheera · · Score: 1

    I run it on a K6/2-200 with 128 Meg and I've seen the same behaviour. The CPU usage spikes when it's first started, then settles down to a more reasonable 8-10%, with occassional bumps into the 20's and dips under 5.

    What I have seen is X slow to a crawl with XMMS running. While I'm only running a 2Meg video card, I always thought it was a little odd that X slowed as much as it did with the CPU load that low.

    Of course, if I want -real- sound, I leave the computer room behind, fire up the stereo, and the let Boston Acoustics rattle the light fixtures...

    --
    Never attribute to malice what can as easily be the result of incompetence...
  9. Try the preferences! by Brecker · · Score: 1

    In gqmpeg, the general preference tab allows you to "enable Window Manager decorations. This will let you do exactly what you want. Coincidentally, if you use enlightenment, you can override the border settings of any window, with about a dozen types to choose from.

  10. Re:Command line version? by grub- · · Score: 1

    i dont use x much and dont want the extra load of something i'm not going to look at, so i stick to command line players. normally i use amp, but for the extra functionality of a playlist and an ncurses based interface i use gamp. gamp is still in the early stages and occasionally wont play certain tracks, but it is a good start. I hope to finish some improvements to it and get a new version up soon.

    Russ

    --
    What do the good know...except what the bad teach them in their excesses? - Clive Barker
  11. Re:Command line version? by Clockwork · · Score: 1

    Guess what the 'x' in xmms stands for?

  12. Multiple soundcards? by DataSquid · · Score: 1

    I'm still rather new to Linux, I'm happy with my setup except for one thing. I'm an MP3 nut, and I use two soundcards and a DJ mixer for mixing. This is a simple setup under Win, but I don't know how to get Linux to install two seperate sound devices. Has anyone had success setting up a second soundcard?

    --

    DataSquid.net, a little about me.
  13. Re:Radiola announces release by ccchips · · Score: 1

    Just turn your case on its side, attach platter, arm, needle and viola!

    Wow----A PLAYER VIOLA!!!

    --
    --------------Rev. C.C.Chips---------------- For the real truth, visit
  14. Re:I prefer hardware decoding by jasoegaard · · Score: 1

    The price is $99 - a little expensive I think.

    --
    -- A Mathematician is a machine for turning coffee into theorems. - Paul Erdös
  15. Re:Needs Plugin: Gueiss by Andy+Dodd · · Score: 1

    It's Geiss by Ryan Geiss.

    I once emailed the guy about Linux support or the possibility of obtaining the source - no reply at all... :(

    Which sucks because there are a helluva lot of modifications I'd love to make to Geiss in addition to a Linux port. (None to the graphical portion, but to the UI portion - I'm taking a class called "Introduction to Digital Music" and it would be really cool to be able to control a vis plugin with MIDI commands embedded in a Digital Performer (Yes, it's using a Mac) project. Geiss is cool, but it would be awesome if you could "script" specific waveform/color/screen combos for different pieces of music automatically.

    --
    retrorocket.o not found, launch anyway?
  16. Use ALSA by Andy+Dodd · · Score: 1

    Go to http://www.alsa-project.org/ - They support a different set of cards than OSS (lots of overlap, but you NEED ALSA for a Trident 4DWave chipset - which is good because ALSA is much better than OSS.) In addition, they have full support for multiple soundcards/system.

    --
    retrorocket.o not found, launch anyway?
  17. Re:Smartplay by Roast+Beef · · Score: 1

    I tried smartplay, but since it creates a matrix of all your MP3's it takes about 10 minutes to load/save its database of my 2000 MP3's. Cool idea, though.

  18. Re:I prefer hardware decoding by TheGratefulNet · · Score: 2

    go to:

    http://freshmeat.net

    learn it; live it; love it.

    and search for mpg123 while you're there.

    --

    --

    --
    "It is now safe to switch off your computer."
  19. Re:I prefer hardware decoding by TheGratefulNet · · Score: 1
    Is a higher bitrate mp3 with noise distortion intact better than the lower bitrate mp3 with no outside distortion?

    I'll take the higher bitrate almost always. its closer to what the original source was - good and bad sound all included.

    What about CAT5 and a 386 laptop

    you still have the sound of the local drive starting and stopping. unless you run from ram[disk] only - which is an option; but then again, 386 laptops usually don't have much ram to run from!

    my idea is to use some kind of remote 'console' in my "quiet playing room" and keep the bulky storage system somewhere else. the lp3 device helps with playback; we need only a remote display and controller. for that, you can sneak by with a matrix orbital style LCD display http://matrix-orbital.com . this is connected via a simple rs232 serial cable. and if you get the one with a keypad interface, you have both input and output ability. define some buttons to be pause, play, ff, etc, etc and write some code to display current song/status and you're all set. a very quiet remote controller (no noise at all) and a very quiet and clean audio output driver.

    --

    --

    --
    "It is now safe to switch off your computer."
  20. Re:Nice....(little offtopic) by Wah · · Score: 1

    Sonique, while it looks pretty and actually plays .mods correctly(which winamp doesn't), has a pretty damn bad interface

    not to take this too far, but the sonique gui is about the best i've seen, as far as being both useful, easy, and cool as all hell. Some flash sites are about as close as i've seen (www.globz.com).

    The knobs are awesome, click on a knob, move a mouse, seems pretty simple to me. The plugin/skin loading is two clicks (from 'net to screen) and works flawlessly. It's also improved (like all software should, M$) a lot over the past two releases. Still some quibbles, and a couple bugs, but it's a nice microbrew (free beer) and is sooo easy on the eyes.

    --
    +&x
  21. Re:Command line version? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just to clear things up, they use a library based off of mpg123, not the actual mpg123 binary.

  22. Re:Still no XMP... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    More importantly, XMP + my AWE32 (8MB RAM) sounds much better than Mikmod

  23. Window management in an MP3 player is crazy! by Jamie+Zawinski · · Score: 3

    Why is it that every graphical MP3 players has to have its own "special" look? I want my title bar, dammit!

    I agree!

    I use XMMS, and I think it has a pretty nice UI, but it's complete lunacy that they felt the need to implement window management in an MP3 player!

    Developers, if you want k-rad eleet title bars, use a k-rad eleet window manager. If you want to write a window manager, write a window manager. But don't force this inconsistency (in both appearance and functionality) on everybody who just wants to run an MP3 player. You aren't writing an ``MP3 Desktop'', you're just writing a damned app.

    gkrellm does the same thing, and it's equally crazy.

  24. Re:Command line version? by orangesquid · · Score: 2

    I use amp 0.7.6 by tomislav uzelac (search freshmeat.net/appindex) -- seems to work fine for me...
    If I have a lot of stuff going in the background, I often do:
    nice -n-20 amp "[artist] song.mp3"

    --
    --TheOrangeSquid Is it any wonder things seem so awry? We swim in a sea of confusion and don't have to think to survive
  25. Re:Command line version? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    This is indeed something I do not understand. Why do all the MP3 players have to have K3WL 3L337 LUZ3R In73RF4C35??!? Some of them at least offer command line control, but what's wrong with ordinary GUI widgets?

    Is there such a thing as a player that uses the standard widgets of some common GUI library?

    han

  26. But where is version 1.0.1? by Masa · · Score: 1

    I noticed that version 1.0.0 doesn't support Aureal. Darn. And I just installed Aureal drivers. I also noticed several comments telling about version 1.0.1 which should be a bug fix for this problem. But I can't find any information about the bugfix or any link for downloading it.

    I'm searching the fix from www.xmms.org (should be the right place, right?)

    1. Re:But where is version 1.0.1? by akujin · · Score: 1

      Version 1.0.1 is supposed to be on the CVS server right now, if you don't know how to download from it just read the help they have on their site :)

  27. Re:Command line version? by Wickie · · Score: 1

    They use mpg123 for playing.

  28. breaks Qsound IQ plugin by tweek · · Score: 4

    For those of you who bought this killer plugin, the new version breaks it. Of course all you have to do is:

    ln -s /usr/lib/libxmms.so.1.0.0 /usr/lib/libxmms.so.0

    your location may be different for the libs but none the less that will fix it.

    This is one example of why I really like to have the source code whenever possible. All I would need to do was recompile against the new libraries. But again, I bought this plugin just because it made things sound SOOO much sweeter.

    --
    "Fighting the underpants gnomes since 1998!" "Bruce Schneier knows the state of schroedinger's cat"
  29. Re:1.1.0 or 1.0.0? by aridhol · · Score: 1

    It's 1.0.0 (You can find out by going to their website :)

    --
    I can't say that I don't give a fuck. I've just run out of fuck to give.
  30. K-J�fol skins by Ilmari · · Score: 2

    There is actually a plugin for K-Jöfol skins, just see under Vizualization plugins at the XMMS Plugin Page
    ---
    Ilmari

    --

    © ilmari. All rights reserved, all wrongs reversed

  31. Needs Plugin: Gueiss by mortonda · · Score: 1

    I was quite disappointed with the plugin contest -
    while I coulnd't do better myself, I was hoping for some better plugins. The best winamp plugin, IMHO, is gueiss (or whatever the spelling is).
    It's a great way to relax with music...


    Anyone got the skills to code it???? :)

    1. Re:Needs Plugin: Gueiss by Wah · · Score: 1

      try sonique with the "CoR's Cosmic Belt" vis, unless of course you don't like seeing cosmic tornadoes dancin' through the universe to whatever vibrations your heart desires.

      --
      +&x
    2. Re:Needs Plugin: Gueiss by mortonda · · Score: 1

      oooo!!! I like the idea!

  32. Re:A strange bug... by Jeff+Mahoney · · Score: 2

    Did it actually play the song? Did you hear sound?

    I've noticed that sometimes XMMS (when first installed) defaults to the disk writer plugin, which would do exactly what you describe, with no output sound.

    Another possible problem is the sound driver. I use the OpenSound Aureal drivers, and if you don't select one of the ``virtual'' /dev/audio's, the track plays just a little fast.. Not enough to make it worthless, but enough to be noticible and annoying.

    Personally - I find xmms to be more convenient than mpg123. I have a private web server that creates playlists from a pointy-clicky javascript tree - and netscape spawning xmms works great. I know that mpg123 could do the same thing, but I don't wanna open an xterm to do it.. and xmms is prettier.

    -Jeff

  33. it's 0% for me by RelliK · · Score: 2

    I have AMD K6/2-300. Not exactly the fastest machine. When xmms starts playing a song the CPU load is at 12-14%. Then, after a few seconds, it goes down to well below 1%. Often you can't even see xmms in top. Perhaps you are trying to run it on a 486?
    ___

    --
    ___
    If you think big enough, you'll never have to do it.
  34. Completely Irresponsible by Lazaru5 · · Score: 3

    "Olle Hällnäs wrote in to tell us that XMMS (the premiere GUI MP3 player for Linux these days"



    Do you have any idea how hard it is to undo this? Any Linux user who may be thinking about trying other Unices will take this to mean that XMMS isn't "for" _insert_other_unix_system_here_. It's not intentional I know, and the message is completely subliminal.

    Open Source isn't just a catch phrase, it means "./configure && make install". To say that XMMS, or any other program that compiles WITHOUT MODIFICTATION from source is "for Linux" undermines the spirit of Open Source.

    This is a big issue for me. I'm a FreeBSD user (I use Linux on my workstation at work, and as a MP3 server at home) and #FreeBSD volunteer and Ports Maintainer, and the "Can I get _insert_open_source_program_here_ for FreeBSD?" gets really annoying.

    Even if the question is "There's not an [RPM|DEB] for _insert_open_source_program_here_ for Linux, how can I get it?" (And I've seen this on #Linux) I still think it's important that people realize what it's all about.

    --

    --
    My comments and opinions completely reflect those of anyone and anything I am remotely associated with.
    1. Re:Completely Irresponsible by embobo · · Score: 1

      I think exactly the opposite. When I hear "X is available for Linux" I think "Cool, that means it probably will run under Solaris too." Then I go to the site/read the README/attempt to compile and run to find out if it actually does work under Solaris.

  35. Still now Shout / IceCast Output Streaming by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    While I hate to complain about a missing feature, without actually contributing to it's development... I would really like to see the ability to stream to a Shoutcast / Icecast server ala WinAmp.

    1. Re:Still now Shout / IceCast Output Streaming by szyzyg · · Score: 2

      Shit!!! Once Again I'm doing a BTDTBTS Post...

      The preliminary release of my liveice plugin for XMMS was just put up today at http://star.arm.ac.uk/~spm/software/liveice-xmms.t ar.gz

      For the brave only...

  36. Re:A strange bug... by Deadbolt · · Score: 1

    I've noticed that sometimes XMMS (when first installed) defaults to the disk writer plugin, which would do exactly what you describe, with no output sound.

    This was correct; it was happily dumping my mp3s to .wav files in my home directory!

    Useful, to be sure, but a little hard to get used to. :)

    If you have this problem, go to Options/Preferences/Output Plugin and select the OSS Driver plugin as your output device. All should be well now.

    --
    "Honey, it's not working out; I think we should make our relationship open-source."
  37. Re:I prefer hardware decoding by TheGratefulNet · · Score: 2
    The price is $99 - a little expensive I think

    ever price a high-end sound card?

    soundblaster live is about $100 (the 'value' edition). and its still noisier than this dongle since the analog 'tronics are too close to the computer bus.

    to get really pure sound, you have to use a digital audio (spdif) card. those start at $400. then you need an external DAC - figure at least $100 for a used one; $300 for a new one. and you STILL don't have a hardware mp3 decoder. not that you really need one but that's extra value you get on this dongle thingie.

    after a few weeks of living with the lp3 device, I'd say it comes 90% as close as the spdif solution I just listed. and at a fraction of the price.

    the ONLY downside is that you can't pump regular audio thru it - it has to be .mp3 format. I'm guessing that the reason they can get away with a printer port interface is that the audio bandwidth (compressed) can fit in the /dev/lp channel. full digital 44.1/16 audio would certainly not fit in a printer port channel.

    one more thought: suppose you use your main computer to store the hundreds of megs (or gigs!) of mp3 files and that system is noisy with fans, chattering disk drives, etc. so you put that machine in your spare room. but you want to listen to your tunes in the bedroom or livingroom. with a conventional analog card, you'd have to run analog wiring for the long distance run. this is lossy and picks up hum. with this device, I would need to run the same length of cable, and it would have to be parallel cable (a bit more expensive and bulky) but its a digital run and not an analog run, so there's zero loss and zero hum pickup. you then place the dongle very close to the preamp of your stereo and bingo: you have extremely low-loss and very high fidelity.

    (this is precisely what I intend to do for my hi-end listening room)

    --

    --

    --
    "It is now safe to switch off your computer."
  38. Re:Bug Fix by megumi · · Score: 1

    I haven't tried it with the latest version, but while testing the Aureal driver last week with XMMS 0.9.5.1, I had to turn off its "use realtime priority"; otherwise XMMS segfaults. My SB Gold doesn't have problem either way. megumi

  39. Re:Nice.... by Wah · · Score: 2

    tell your friend running winamp to go get sonique and you can be jealous again. I keep bugging them for a linux version, but my bug isn't loud enough.

    --
    +&x
  40. Yes, it was the diskwriter plugin by Telcontar · · Score: 1

    Maybe they should have used the defaults from the previous version. Another problem is that it does not find the skins in /usr/local/share/xmms/Skins. This also worked fine before.
    Xmms would be neat if one could choose several directories for shuffle play... does anyone know whether this is possible? Otherwise I'll stick to mpg123...

  41. Re:I prefer hardware decoding by technos · · Score: 2

    But is the cost of the LCD and keypad cheaper than a used 386/486 laptop? I wasn't advocating using the built in sound on the laptop (gawd no! SB/16 clones that sound like saws!), but using the laptop to run the dongle. Mount a NFS share from the base PC. You get the nicely noise insulated sound AND a cheap controller. Another advantage of the laptop would be possible addition of an IR transmitter, to control the variety of equipment one inevitably has in his/her sound rack. (Hell, wire a IR LED to the serial port and modulate the port in software..)

    --
    .sig: Now legally binding!
  42. OSS version numbering by LocalYokel · · Score: 2

    According to CmdrTaco, the version number seems to keep falling. It's gone from 1.1.0 to 1.0.0, apparently in the time it takes to write two sentences.

    I can't wait for better performance and stability at version 0.1.3-pre5! Open source software has such funny version numbering. I can't wait to see Emacs hit version number parity with the current year, either...

    --

    --
    E2 IN2 IE?

  43. Re:Bug Fix by slothdog · · Score: 1

    I noticed that xmms wouldn't work with my Aureal card when using OSS for the output, but worked fine using eSound....

  44. Re:Skins are NOT themes.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I AGREE. I want the title bar too. It can be an option as well. I hate to see a funky alien window on my desktop. And, I also want a "goto CDROM" button in the file selection dialog.

  45. Reading comprehension skills... by osu-neko · · Score: 3
    "Olle Hällnäs wrote in to tell us that XMMS (the premiere GUI MP3 player for Linux these days"

    Do you have any idea how hard it is to undo this? Any Linux user who may be thinking about trying other Unices will take this to mean that XMMS isn't "for" _insert_other_unix_system_here_. It's not intentional I know, and the message is completely subliminal.


    No, it's not true that any Linux user will read that as meaning it's only available for Linux. Only those with poor reading comprehension skills.

    If someone reads the correct statement "Netscape is the most popular web browser for Linux these days" as meaning "Netscape is only available for Linux", they have poor reading skills. Likewise, if someone read the quoted statement as meaning XMMS is only available for Linux, they too have poor reading skills.

    How do we undo this? Better education in the schools, perhaps? I don't know. But I don't think refraining from making accurate and factual statements because they might be misinterpretted is the answer.

    --

    --
    "Convictions are more dangerous enemies of truth than lies."
  46. Re:Hmmmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    On my PII 350 (1 Processor), the maximum I've seen was maybee 3% but most of the time, it doesn't even show up in `top`...

    PS.: I compiled it myself, I'm not using a binary package.

  47. Re:Still one simple bug by peteralm · · Score: 2

    You need to check your glasses! After 99 minutes it switches to 1:40 not 1:00! Please don't post this patch again!

  48. broken with 2.3.x kernels by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Linux x.x.com 2.3.38 #1 Mon Jan 10 00:21:12 PST 2000 i586 unknown

    [snip] Making all in cdaudio make[3]: Entering directory `/mnt/hd/tranquillo/xmms-1.0.0/Input/cdaudio' /bin/sh ../../libtool --mode=compile gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I../.. -I/usr/X11R6/include -I/usr/lib/glib/include -D_REENTRANT -g -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer -funroll-all-loops -finline-functions -ffast-math -m486 -c cddb.c gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I../.. -I/usr/X11R6/include -I/usr/lib/glib/include -D_REENTRANT -g -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer -funroll-all-loops -finline-functions -ffast-math -m486 -c -fPIC -DPIC cddb.c -o cddb.lo In file included from http.h:30, from cddb.c:24: /usr/include/netinet/in.h:251: warning: `ntohl' redefined /usr/include/linux/byteorder/generic.h:164: warning: this is the location of the previous definition /usr/include/netinet/in.h:252: warning: `ntohs' redefined /usr/include/linux/byteorder/generic.h:165: warning: this is the location of the previous definition /usr/include/netinet/in.h:253: warning: `htonl' redefined /usr/include/linux/byteorder/generic.h:162: warning: this is the location of the previous definition /usr/include/netinet/in.h:254: warning: `htons' redefined /usr/include/linux/byteorder/generic.h:163: warning: this is the location of the previous definition In file included from http.h:30, from cddb.c:24: /usr/include/netinet/in.h:232: conflicting types for `ntohl' /usr/include/linux/byteorder/generic.h:149: previous declaration of `ntohl' /usr/include/netinet/in.h:234: conflicting types for `htonl' /usr/include/linux/byteorder/generic.h:151: previous declaration of `htonl' make[3]: *** [cddb.lo] Error 1 make[3]: Leaving directory `/mnt/hd/tranquillo/xmms-1.0.0/Input/cdaudio' make[2]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 make[2]: Leaving directory `/mnt/hd/tranquillo/xmms-1.0.0/Input' make[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 make[1]: Leaving directory `/mnt/hd/tranquillo/xmms-1.0.0' make: *** [all-recursive-am] Error 2

    did anybody get this to work on x86 with the new kernels? thanks

  49. Re:Skins are NOT themes.. by bobsquatch · · Score: 1

    i.e. instead of "hitting skip on a crappy song, going back to work, getting another topics crappy song and needing to quit work (mentally) to skip it" you can just skip all the shit at once. Well, WADR, the problem is between the keyboard and the chair. "Hitting skip" is not the way to solve the problem of unwanted songs in your playlist. "Deleting the song from the playlist" is the solution. c.f. Larry Wall on "true laziness."

    --

    --
    --
    #define private public
  50. Re:Still one simple bug by ROC · · Score: 1

    After 99 minutes it switches to 1:40 not 1:00!

    still not exactly what you would expect...

  51. Re:Still no XMP... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is it possible to make XMMS play through /dev/sequencer instead of /dev/dsp? All the current plugins seem to use digital audio instead of sequencing data.

  52. Re:Skins are NOT themes.. by Lightn · · Score: 1

    If you had read what he said, it also uses a neural net to detect your mood. So maybe you don't want to hear the song now, but you want to hear it when you are feeling different. Plus, you can hit skip on a bunch of upcoming songs, not just the current one that is playing, like with your method.

  53. Bug Fix by shitface · · Score: 3

    There is at least one known bug for XMMS 1.0.0. The XMMS website says:

    • If you own a Aureal soundcard and are using the Aureal drivers, XMMS 1.0.0 will not work. This bug has been fixed in CVS and XMMS 1.0.1 will be released later today.
    --
    Real men dump cores! Read my journal, I am neat.
    1. Re:Bug Fix by kmcardle · · Score: 2

      I snagged 1.0.0 as soon as I could get it. I also snagged the Aureal drivers last weekend.

      Everything is working fine. Odd. I'll have to check which version I have when I get home.

      Or perhaps I've been listening to the same songs for so long that I'm starting to hear them when I sit down in front of the computer. :P
      --

      --
      then it comes to be that the soothing light at the end of your tunnel is just a freight train coming your way
  54. Taco should prview first by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yo, Rob- like the reply page says:

    • (Use the Preview Button! Check those URLs! Don't forget the http://!
    Well CmdrTaco you put the wrong version number it is not 1.1.0 but 1.0.0 and soon to be 1.0.1!! Give up some karma for your mistake!
  55. Beware by SendBot · · Score: 2

    Make sure that you rebuild and replace the libraries if you're upgrading. I tried to just replace my executable, and it completely blew up. And I'm too lazy to figure out how to get all the libs I want to compile, so I'll go back to work now and wait for the debian packages to arrive.

    1. Re:Beware by -brazil- · · Score: 1

      Same problem here; I really wish Linux programmers weren't quite as keen about always using the newest libraries.

      --

      The illegal we do immediately. The unconstitutional takes a little longer.
      --Henry Kissinger

    2. Re:Beware by larien · · Score: 2

      I think it's more a case of the xmms libs need to be recompiled, not just the main binary. If you do ./configure;make;make install, you should be fine; .configure;make;cp xmms/xmms /usr/local/bin isn't going to be enough.
      --

  56. RPM's for MESA plugins... by garcia · · Score: 1


    there is no other method to install a MESA visual plugin other than RPM. The RPM is built against the XMMS 1.0.0 RPM (which wouldn't install due to another lib dependancy that I didn't feel like chasing down) so AFAIK if you didn't install the XMMS RPM you can't use the XMMS MESA plugin to do some cool fullscreen stuff :(

  57. Command line version? by Cyberdyne · · Score: 1
    Ideally, I'd like to see a command-line version (is there one??) I have tried others - mpg123, for example, but had problems with half my MP3 collection due to funny sample rates etc. :-(

    Does anyone have any suggestions? That decoder routine swallows 25% of the CPU in the previous version! Would I be better converting them to compressed WAV-type files for playback, given that I have plenty of disk space?

    1. Re:Command line version? by BiLlCaT · · Score: 1

      i'm using newplayer. works great for me... kinda wierd to use. uses curses, but close to command line... at least you don't have to run X.
      ------------------------------------------
      the amazing bc
      latin/funk flugelhorn & trumpet
      webnaut, music junkie, sysadmin from hell

      --
      the amazing bc
      just another guy doing IT
      webnaut, music junkie, holes-in-head
  58. JudgePagLIVR by JudgePagLIVR · · Score: 2

    And God said, "Let there be an MP3 playter that actually works, on an OS that actually works, and let it not be plagued by stupid lawsuits brought about by greed megalomaniac entertainment conglomerates."

    And God looked upon the MP3 player , and saw that it was good.

    Way to go, programmers!

    --
    Judge Pag, the Learned, Impartial, and Very Relaxed
  59. 1.1.0 or 1.0.0? by garver · · Score: 2

    So is it 1.1.0 or 1.0.0 that was just released? Guessing 1.0.0.

  60. perl plugin, or freeamp by divec · · Score: 1

    You can use the perl plugin for xmms to control it from the command line. Alternatively, you could get Freeamp, which is GPL and has a command-line interface (as well as a graphical one).

    If you use freeamp, the syntax is:

    freeamp -ui freeampcmd blah.mp3

    --

    perl -e 'fork||print for split//,"hahahaha"'

  61. Hmmmm by Reality_X · · Score: 1

    Woohoo!
    XMMS does rock, but ... does anyone else experience weird CPU usage when running XMMS ? It checks up 99% of CPU on some machines I've run it on? Is it just tricking 'top' or something else ?

    1. Re:Hmmmm by neko+the+frog · · Score: 1

      hrm, not here. it's eating up 90% like god meant it to be :)

      --
      -- the opinions stated above aren't those of my employer. in fact, they're probably not even my own. you know what, ju
    2. Re:Hmmmm by prwood · · Score: 1

      Well, on my system, performance is great when I am using the OSS plugin, but it's not quite as good when using the Esound plugin. I get less than 1% CPU utilization and generally faster performance with OSS, and 6-7% CPU utilization and slower performance with the Esound plugin. This is on a 300 Mhz PowerPC G3 with LinuxPPC. I have also built the binary myself from the latest CVS build.

    3. Re:Hmmmm by osu-neko · · Score: 1
      Idle cycles are wasted cycles. :)

      --

      --
      "Convictions are more dangerous enemies of truth than lies."
    4. Re:Hmmmm by Coriolis · · Score: 1

      It also generates scadloads of X traffic, even when it's idle in winshade mode.

      --
      Rgasuya aata! : I have been coding Perl and cannot tell where my fingers are now!
    5. Re:Hmmmm by neko+the+frog · · Score: 1

      er, wtf? lemme try that again...
      anyway, it's eating up less than 1% of cpu on my 233mhz imac; and _rc5des_ is eating up its share of over 90% cpu :)

      in other news, this fixes the one bug i was having (it hung upon quit), so i'm happy. took forever to compile tho :\

      --
      -- the opinions stated above aren't those of my employer. in fact, they're probably not even my own. you know what, ju
  62. Nice.... by Count+Spatula · · Score: 1

    Support for .wmz skins? Right on. Now I can get all those cool skins that my friend has on his Winamp. Next feature to look for? An anti-sysadmin mp3 disguising tool specifically for those that like to put mp3s on their school's servers...

    --
    -- Count Spatula: The Culinary Vampire "...because my cooking sucks."
    1. Re:Nice.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Next feature to look for? An anti-sysadmin mp3 disguising tool specifically for those that like to put mp3s on their school's servers...

      Sorry about the AC -- I'm moderating.

      You can rename the xmms binary to something like "emacs" -- this won't fool a real sysadmin, but for someone quickly scanning a ps tree or a top, it will be somewhat hidden.

    2. Re:Nice.... by generic-man · · Score: 3

      When you go to download a .wsz skin, simply rename it to have a .zip extension and save it in your skins directory. A wsz file is simply a zip file renamed to be associated with WinAmp in a Win32 environment.

      --
      For more information, click here.
    3. Re:Nice.... by bdjohns1 · · Score: 1
      Actually, I discovered and reported a minor bug in the handling of WinAMP skin files. Like the AC mentioned, you can either rename the files to have a .zip extension, or do something like this:

      -in xmms/skinwin.c at line 152, there's an if statement listing a bunch of file types. Just add in another OR case for .wsz following the same format, and it's all good.

  63. ?tsoP tsriF by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I believe he meant to say 1.0.0 :)

    Anyways, if the volume control doesn't work for you, go under preferences->configure OSS-> Mixer -> and click on the button.

    Thanks,
    Pete

  64. What version? by coonic · · Score: 1

    I woundered what version it was when I saw the news. Since I hadn't heard of a 1.0.0 release, I guessed it was that (and not 1.1.0), but I checked the homepage of xmms, and what did I find? 1.0.1 =)

    1.0.0, 1.1.0 or 1.0.1. It all looks so digital ;c)

  65. But when? by ]ix[ · · Score: 1

    Are we going to get some realy nifty playlist control. And crossfading output. Or have I not RTM properly? :)

    --
    This is my sig, show me yours
  66. In related news... by BiGGO · · Score: 1

    The XMMS competition is over.

    The winner was the xmms-speakers with jakedaw and kint following.
    Personally I liked Blursk the most. :-)


    ---
    The day Microsoft makes something that doesn't suck,

    --


    ---
    I'm going to live forever, or die in the attempt.
  67. Re:Skins are NOT themes.. by dexev · · Score: 1

    <gripe>
    Why is it that every graphical MP3 players has to have its own "special" look? I want my title bar, dammit!
    </gripe>

    I've got three of these on my system (freeamp, gqmpeg, and now xmms) and I don't use any of them, because of this -- mpg123 in an xterm is less painful.

  68. How long 'til the Lawsuit? by Greyfox · · Score: 1

    I'm sure the RIAA will try to sue them over some silly shit. Probably try to claim music distribution is a trade secret or something like that.

    --

    I'm trying to teach myself to set people on fire with my mind... Is it hot in here?

  69. EEK! by SendBot · · Score: 1

    Well, I went ahead without mikmod support. It plays mp3's about 6 times as fast, with no audible output, and dies shortly afterward. And I don't have that sound card that breaks it either.

    1. Re:EEK! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      so do you now have a hard drive full of .wav backup files? ;-)

    2. Re:EEK! by Threed · · Score: 1

      You need to set up XMMS to use the proper output plugin or else it will use the wav-writer. The wav writer runs very fast and doesn't produce any sound.

  70. Re:Skins are NOT themes.. by andi75 · · Score: 1
    Features: it uses random play but it displays the list of the next 20 songs it will play and allows you to remove them from the queue at any time, i.e. instead of "hitting skip on a crappy song, going back to work, getting another crappy song and needing to quit work (mentally) to skip it" you can just skip all the shit at once.

    You can do that with XMMS too:

    Misc Options->Sort List->Randomize List and then delete the songs you don't want...

  71. HUh? Use Winamp! by TacQuire · · Score: 1

    I use Winamp for linux, am I the only one? I was quite happy when I discovered that there was a linux version on my redhat disk. It works fine.

    1. Re:HUh? Use Winamp! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't you mean X11amp ? XMMS is the renewed X11amp.

      'BE the difference that makes a difference' - JEWEL

    2. Re:HUh? Use Winamp! by Menthos · · Score: 2
      To my best knowledge, there is no Winamp for Linux. What you may be using is a program called xmms, formerly known as x11amp, that looks and feels like Winamp (and can use its themes).

      But it's an entirely different program, and in contrast to Winamp fully GPL, which is why it sometimes get's its own thread on sites like Slashdot.
      Hope this clears up things a bit.

      --

      GNU/Linux. The Freshmaker.

  72. Sound Blaster Live! Question by SgtPepper · · Score: 1

    Anyone have any issues getting this to run with a sound blaster live? I keep getting "Can Not Open Audio", but everything else seems to work with the beta drivers from Creative ( yes i /did/ install them ) And it seems to play CDs just fine, but i can't get MP3s to work...simple issue of two totally different methods maybe? ( That's my uninformed guess, that the MP3 has to go though some sort of decoding and that the CDs kind of get decoded through the CDROM and just get piped straight out of the card, but what do i know? ) Ah well, anyone running Linux with an SBLive that has gotten this to work?

    this sig is not here

  73. I prefer hardware decoding by TheGratefulNet · · Score: 5
    and a command-line player. gui shoomey ;-)

    there's a neat little hardware dongle thingie at:

    http://lp3music.com

    the only limitation is that it can't decode mp3's beyond 192k. that is a bummer - but if you try 192k mode on a good encoder (blade-enc is fine at that rate), you'll be very surprised at the quality; especially with this external decoder unit.

    it has the advantage of all the analog electronics being outside the PC. less clock noise and hum = cleaner sound. oh, and since the decode is in hardware, your cpu util. is almost nil. and the best part is that it only needs a printer port - not an ISA or PCI slot. so its perfect for laptops. even older 386 laptops!

    oh, and yes, there is linux support for this. they provide links for linux sourcecode to drive this. and there's even some work being done to make this an xmms plug-in; for those who insist on a ooey-gui.

    ob disc: I'm just a customer who enjoys this hardware product. I had nothing to do with the design, implementation or anything else for that matter

    --

    --

    --
    "It is now safe to switch off your computer."
    1. Re:I prefer hardware decoding by sgml4kids · · Score: 1

      Is there a good commandline player for MP3's? It seems kind of silly that a pre-requisite for listening to MP3s is X....

    2. Re:I prefer hardware decoding by technos · · Score: 2

      Thanks! I've got a couple of DX-4 laptops that I use regularly, and while they're fast enough to decode mp3's, they don't have any sound capability. There has never been a real market for PCMCIA sound cards, so the ones still on the market are $289 and come with all sorts of fancy professional A/V features..

      Looks like this little devil will solve my problem!

      --
      .sig: Now legally binding!
    3. Re:I prefer hardware decoding by FigWig · · Score: 1

      Err, SPDIF out is becoming pretty standard on cheap sound cards. I have a Xitel Platinum with TOSLINK out at up to 48kHz and it was about $70. The SB Live MP3 has coax SPDIF out and costs about the same. Also see Hoontech 4D Wave and many others...

      I have also seen a soundcard with TOSLINK in & out for $150, but unfortunately I don't recall the name.

      --
      Scuttlemonkey is a troll
    4. Re:I prefer hardware decoding by technos · · Score: 2

      What about CAT5 and a 386 laptop? Then not only do you get the noise isolation offered by the dongle, the capability to play at a remote location, but you get local control or what is played. You don't want to have to run down to the computer to flip the track. Plus, most of the run is cheap ethernet.

      One concern I would have is the device limits the sample rate of the mp3 played. Is a higher bitrate mp3 with noise distortion intact better than the lower bitrate mp3 with no outside distortion?

      --
      .sig: Now legally binding!
    5. Re:I prefer hardware decoding by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      get a Trident 4Dwave/NX card for $50 if you want SPDIF. You still need an external DAC, but SPDIF capable cards do NOT start at $400 as you assert.

      Its also an excellent card, and very well supported by alsa.

    6. Re:I prefer hardware decoding by TheGratefulNet · · Score: 1
      but the spdif on the SB cards is resampled!! and not even well implemented ;-(

      so, by definition, its not pure. and its jittery as hell. only marginally better than normal analog.

      --

      --

      --
      "It is now safe to switch off your computer."
  74. Re:Nice....(little offtopic) by Pyro+P · · Score: 2

    tell your friend running winamp to go get sonique and you can be jealous again. I keep bugging them for a linux version, but my bug isn't loud enough.
    Sonique, while it looks pretty and actually plays .mods correctly(which winamp doesn't), has a pretty damn bad interface, with a bad case of "I-really-want-to-look-like-a-hand-held-player-iti s". For example, you have to move the knobs with your mouse, while knobs in real life are designed to be frobbed with one's finger. You can't frob a knob on a screen with your fingers, which makes it a pain. Sliders would be a much better choice. And want to, say, use the equalizer while looking at the spectral analyzer? Too bad. Sonique's interface won't let you. You can cycle through playlist to equalizer to spectral analyzer, but you can't view any of them at the same time.
    IMHO, the only thing sonique has over winamp is that it plays mods correctly, and xmms already plays mods correctly.

    --
    If 90% of everything isn't crap, your standards are too high.
  75. XMMS is not just an mp3 player! by Pyro+P · · Score: 2

    XMMS is not just an mp3 player. With the aid of the mikmod libraries, it is
    also a mod file player(that's the music kind of mod file, as in the stuff at the hornet archive). Given the
    right plugin, it is also a viable alternative to many hallucinogens :)

    --
    If 90% of everything isn't crap, your standards are too high.
  76. Re:Nice....(little offtopic) by Pyro+P · · Score: 2

    The knobs are awesome, click on a knob, move a mouse, seems pretty simple to me. No, that's not my point. It is simple. It's also stupid. You can't click on a point on a knob and have it move to that value, as you can with a slider or something else. My point was that the sonique interface enforces physical limitations where they aren't needed. I suggest reading up on interface design at a sight like this one.

    --
    If 90% of everything isn't crap, your standards are too high.
  77. Re:Smartplay by Weezul · · Score: 2

    I tried smartplay, but since it creates a matrix of all your MP3's it takes about 10 minutes to load/save its database of my 2000 MP3's. Cool idea, though.

    Hehe.. I keep it to under 600 mp3s, but it still takes a long time. I guess implementing an O(n^2) algorithm in perl was not a good idea. :)

    Well that's why I only claim it to be ``proof of concept.'' It would be nice if one of the real players picks up the idea and dose some real research into the AI side of it too.. and writing stuff in C instead of Perl. Unfortunatly, I have almost no time for this sort of thing.. graduate school eats all my time.

    There are also neet things that can be done with AI players on the net which talk among themselves and share songs, i.e. your player makes recomendations to your friends players. It would be a kind of radio that everyone contributed "taste" to, but no one had to put in the time to DJ. It could send out the recommendation once you lissened to the song. You friends system would track how much they liked recommendations from you just like they track mp3s. Unfortunatly, I do not know enough AI or psychology to pull this off, but [addressing everyone] if you are an AI, computer interfaces, or psychology type person then this could make a cool project.

    The goal of our user interfaces should be to keep us from waisting our lives screwing arround with the time consuming parts.

    Jeff

    --
    The Christian religion has been and still is the principal enemy of moral progress in the world. -- Bertrand Russell
  78. Re:Radiola announces release by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Attach a viola to the case? :)

  79. Re:Smartplay by Seth+Golub · · Score: 1
    if you are an AI, computer interfaces, or psychology type person then this could make a cool project.

    I'm working on an MSc in AI, and I'm currently hashing out details of a project proposal for exactly this sort of thing.

    A major problem with Smartplay is that it doesn't generalize. When it learns something about one song, that doesn't contribute to its knowledge about other songs. That's what I want to fix. I don't expect to be able to make a program that understands all the nuances of what makes one song like another, but I think I can make something that correlates at least a little to some of people's similarity measures, and that's better than nothing.

    The first task is extracting features from the audio. I have a bunch of ideas, but limited time here (where I can get help from clueful professors), and I'd like to have all the feature extractors done before the official start of my project (in April). I'm going to GPL everything I write. If anyone wants to help out, drop me a line.

  80. yup, me too.. by Jose · · Score: 1

    thats why I'll stick with gqmpeg/mpg123 for now.
    For awhile xmms will do fine...but then every once in a while it'll just up to %50 CPU usage...thats on a dual 400, so I don't think that is right!

    --
    The basic sleazeware produced in a drunken fury by a bunch of UCBerkeley grad students was still the core of BIND. --PV
    1. Re:yup, me too.. by larien · · Score: 2

      From watching the XMMS-devel mailing list, I've heard about this a lot. It seems to be a symptom SMP systems, possibly in the sound drivers.
      --

  81. Watch out! by Oscarfish · · Score: 3
    Good ol' RIAA might be after the developers. Let's follow their logic:

    "XMMS runs on Linux." + "Hackers use Linux." = "Hackers use XMMS"

    "Hackers use XMMS" + "XMMS plays MP3 files" = "Hey, it's the DeCSS of the music industry!"

    I called Vegas and the odds are 2:1 in favor of a DeCSS'ish string of arrests before the day is out. Buckle up everybody! Mirror sites, I pray for you! :)

    --

    --------

    Oscarfish.com: tropical fish with attitude. Way t

  82. these are the apps by DjReagan · · Score: 3

    Its this sort of application that is helping bring Linux to the mainstream. The office suites have been out for a little while now. The linux games are starting to sprout up all over the place, and now the multimedia and entertainment utilities are coming through as finished, professional products. Assuming we can get the MPAA off our backs about the CSS fiasco, we're well on the way to being a system that is not only good for the hackers, but useful for the end-user also.
    --

    --
    "When I grow up, I want to be a weirdo"
  83. Skins are NOT themes.. by Weezul · · Score: 3

    I must say I have been really disapointed with the tendency of OSS mp3 player to just copy winamp's skinability. The truth is skins are a really lame form of user configuration because they make it more difficult to change the interface in meaningful ways (as opposed to E themes or something where you actually do reconfigure the interface).

    Now, you ask "who would want to change the interface to their mp3 player?" Well there are a lot of reasons, but they mostly boil down to (1) playlists are a waist of time and (2) you will waist you life away skipping songs you are not in the mood to hear if you use random play. I wrote an mpg123 front end called smartplay using perl/gtk which tries to fix these problems. Warning: this is ``proof of concept'' which means it will probable crash sometimes. Features: it uses random play but it displays the list of the next 20 songs it will play and allows you to remove them from the queue at any time, i.e. instead of "hitting skip on a crappy song, going back to work, getting another crappy song and needing to quit work (mentally) to skip it" you can just skip all the shit at once. Also, it tracks you lissening patterns to try and opimize it's random file selector to your mood as determined to the kinds of songs you have been lissening to compleatly.

    Jeff

    --
    The Christian religion has been and still is the principal enemy of moral progress in the world. -- Bertrand Russell
    1. Re:Skins are NOT themes.. by Glytch · · Score: 1

      By your logic, Windowmaker themes are really just skins. Not just Windowmaker, but almost every other WM besides E. Well, I suppose they are just skins, but I don't really care. It's just eyecandy. Sometimes eyecandy is nice. In something like an MP3 player, it's pretty harmless.

      Besides, if you don't like a song in the XMMS playlist, click it and remove it from the list. Simple as that.

  84. Official Press Release and ChangeLog by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2
  85. Radiola announces release by MorboNixon · · Score: 1

    The Radiola company announced the release of a new hardware kit that allows your Linux box to play vinyl records! Just turn your case on its side, attach platter, arm, needle and viola! You can be listening to Frampton Comes Alive in no time! No need to wait for pesky downloads and no fear of grubbing music industry lawyers lookin' to throw the book at ya! Get one now before the other kids on the block have one!

  86. 1.01 info by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  87. Solaris plugin by larien · · Score: 3

    For those interested, I'll be updating the Solaris plugin to work with 1.0.x releases either today or by Monday at the latest (disasters at work notwithstanding).
    --

  88. Use skins with XMMS to get that feel by talonyx · · Score: 2

    Skins can give you the basic look and feel of any interface you want for your XMMS / WinAmp player.

    XMMS uses WinAmp skins, and a huge mass of them are available at winamp.com.
    As much as all you linux junkies hate going to anything with Win in the title :), there's some good stuff there... you can find just about anything. Or go to a search engine and search for "winamp skins".

    Personally, I've found the BeAmp skin gives a good BeOS feel, if you want something that's like standard GUI widgets.
    There are also nicer skins with custom UI's-- the Fusion based ones are nice, I believe one of those is XMMS's base skin (it is in the version I have, anyway), or try X-perienze for a quasi-futuristic look.

    You can always design your own skin too.
    --
    Talon Karrde

  89. Use the Source, Luke by FreeUser · · Score: 3

    You can easilly download the sourcecode and add a feature, say a command-line --titlebar, or something. Wine has this capability (--window-managed or something like that) which allows the window manager to manage Wine windows, a feature I use whenever running wine as I hate the default WABIesque behavior of sticking to my virtual desktop.

    A similar feature for xmms shouldn't be that hard if you really want it, and a friendly suggestion to the developers might work wonders. Myself, I prefer not having title bars on my xmms, but freedom of choice is what Open Source is all about.

    --
    The Future of Human Evolution: Autonomy
  90. A strange bug... by Telcontar · · Score: 2

    When I tried xmms (after stopping mpg123), it played the song at full speed (using 100% available CPU all the time, no timing), which means it took maybe ten seconds to play a five minute song :-)

    Did anyone experience such a bug, too?

  91. Still one simple bug by Puppe · · Score: 5

    I've mailed the xmms team 2-3 times even with patches for this bug.

    The timer thinks 1 hour is 99 minutes, so after the timer passes 99:59 it says 1:00:00, but it should wrap after 59:59.

    Here is the fix

    --- main.c~ Mon Jan 24 20:11:01 2000
    +++ main.c Fri Jan 28 15:19:29 2000
    @@ -2640,7 +2640,7 @@
    stime_prefix = ' ';
    }
    t /= 1000;
    - if (t > 99 * 60)
    + if (t > 60 * 60)
    t /= 60;
    number_set_number(mainwin_10min_num, t / 600);
    number_set_number(mainwin_min_num, (t / 60) % 10);



    --- playlistwin.c~ Mon Jan 24 20:11:02 2000
    +++ playlistwin.c Fri Jan 28 15:20:01 2000
    @@ -1545,7 +1545,7 @@

    if (time 99 * 60)
    + if (time > 60 * 60)
    time /= 60;

    text = g_strdup_printf("%c%-2.2d", sign, time / 60);

  92. Still no XMP... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Eh, still no XMP plugin in the bundle... It's a great player, visit the site and bug the authors to write a plugin... I want my bunch of SQSHed exotic Amiga mods playing in XMMS ;)