In particular the coronal heating problem, but also the faint early sun problem. The electric sun model shows great promise, but I do not pretend to have perfect knowledge about our universe like your ilk.
Or maybe they could solve more real crimes instead of focusing primarily on people who use drugs. But, you see, that is never going to happen because the drug war is a major cash cow for the little piglets.
Who do you think would have control of that footage? The individual, or the government? You know the answer to this. When you control all access to the footage you don't have to worry about those miserable peons ever seeing footage you don't want them to see.
There are no girls on the internet.
On the internet we are all equal.
Someone who claims to be a woman on the internet is attempting to get special treatment which they do not deserve.
Apparently you know absolutely nothing about the advertising industry. Such studies happen all the time. They just aren't published, because that would be giving Intel, which you paid a lot of money to get, to your competitors.
This is not in violation of the law. The law is about the advertisement itself, not who it is shown to.
If it said on the advertisement "only whites can apply", or "female applicants only", then it would fall afoul of such a law. Selectively showing it to specific groups has nothing to do with laws like this one, otherwise you would have to make a braille version so you don't exclude the blind and other such nonsense.
If you want to talk about the beginnings of gun control you need to read a bit farther back in your history books. Gun control was started almost immediately after the Civil War by Democrats in the south in an attempt to disarm the black population so they could not fight for equal rights. Gun control was merely ratcheted up when the Black Panthers came on the scene.
In order to change those things we will need our guns. Without them we are completely powerless to change anything within the government, because governments do not fear an unarmed population.
We know safety is not the goal because we are not completely stupid/brainwashed. Disarming the public is a primary goal for all people in power because it helps to secure their power against revolution. If you cannot understand that simple concept then there is no hope for you, you will always be a slave to someone.
Damn, I wish I hadn't commented yet so I could mod you up for this one.
The reality is even worse than you suggest though. There has never even been a placebo test of a vaccine. Not one in the history of mankind, but that is a requirement for any other type of drug.
Not only do vaccines get a double standard in manufacturer liability, but they also get a massive double standard in requirements for approval.
If the medical field followed your beliefs bloodletting would still be a common practice and speaking of germs would mean loosing your medical license.
Your ignorance is the worst possible kind of ignorance, absolute belief that you are right.
Slashdot Mirror
The physical therapy department of every hospital large enough to have one would like to have a word with you.
In particular the coronal heating problem, but also the faint early sun problem. The electric sun model shows great promise, but I do not pretend to have perfect knowledge about our universe like your ilk.
When the model fails to explain reality only morons believe the model is true.
So, what is the empirical evidence that shows that?
That would certainly help.
You seem to be under the misconception that the government would allow you to choose the camera you had to wear.
Agreed.
Or maybe they could solve more real crimes instead of focusing primarily on people who use drugs. But, you see, that is never going to happen because the drug war is a major cash cow for the little piglets.
Who do you think would have control of that footage? The individual, or the government? You know the answer to this. When you control all access to the footage you don't have to worry about those miserable peons ever seeing footage you don't want them to see.
That's still a complete ripoff.
There are no girls on the internet.
On the internet we are all equal.
Someone who claims to be a woman on the internet is attempting to get special treatment which they do not deserve.
So.. gravel?
You did not make yourself clear because your argument is nonsense.
Apparently you know absolutely nothing about the advertising industry. Such studies happen all the time. They just aren't published, because that would be giving Intel, which you paid a lot of money to get, to your competitors.
This is not in violation of the law. The law is about the advertisement itself, not who it is shown to.
If it said on the advertisement "only whites can apply", or "female applicants only", then it would fall afoul of such a law. Selectively showing it to specific groups has nothing to do with laws like this one, otherwise you would have to make a braille version so you don't exclude the blind and other such nonsense.
Have you ever heard of the Pledge of Allegiance? Were you allowed to sit while it was being said at school?
I'm all for an amendment requiring gun ownership. If you can't afford one you can be issued one.
I've known many nurses, including my mom, and aside from jobs at physicians offices, the hours are terrible and the pay is shit.
If you want to talk about the beginnings of gun control you need to read a bit farther back in your history books. Gun control was started almost immediately after the Civil War by Democrats in the south in an attempt to disarm the black population so they could not fight for equal rights. Gun control was merely ratcheted up when the Black Panthers came on the scene.
In order to change those things we will need our guns. Without them we are completely powerless to change anything within the government, because governments do not fear an unarmed population.
We know safety is not the goal because we are not completely stupid/brainwashed. Disarming the public is a primary goal for all people in power because it helps to secure their power against revolution. If you cannot understand that simple concept then there is no hope for you, you will always be a slave to someone.
Damn, I wish I hadn't commented yet so I could mod you up for this one.
The reality is even worse than you suggest though. There has never even been a placebo test of a vaccine. Not one in the history of mankind, but that is a requirement for any other type of drug.
Not only do vaccines get a double standard in manufacturer liability, but they also get a massive double standard in requirements for approval.
If the medical field followed your beliefs bloodletting would still be a common practice and speaking of germs would mean loosing your medical license.
Your ignorance is the worst possible kind of ignorance, absolute belief that you are right.
Overwhelming medical evidence huh? Show me the double blind placebo safety test performed on a vaccine. I bet you can't show me one.
"Poorly thought out" is an extreme understatement.