Your cat would also love old-school antifreeze, but that doesn't mean that you should let your cat eat it. Cat food has to be mostly meat or else it will not provide nutrition to them. They cannot digest plants, they only eat them at all to aid in digestion of the actual food they eat, much like how many birds eat rocks to aid their digestion. The birds cannot digest the rocks and the cats cannot digest the grass.
It wouldn't matter if there was not a single sex slave in the entire world women, as a whole, will always hate prostitution.
They hate prostitution for the same reason they hate sluts. Sluts lower their power over men by offering sex without extreme demands, same as prostitutes.
I an neither a liar or a troll, unless we are talking about religion, then I will troll you mercilessly.
By the time that Salk and Sabin were developing polio vaccines in the 1950s, blinded testing of polio vaccines was a 20-year old subject (without success, it must be said). Dozens of trials on different strains were carried out in the development of the vaccine though the 1950s.
Show me the studies.
Through the 1980s (and 1990s and 2000s, and most of the 2010s), I've been watching reports of the start of blinded trials of (candidate AIDS vaccine of the year) in the science press. Normally followed by a report of the trial being stopped weeks or months later due to side effects, ineffectiveness, or interfering fuckwit politicians. Though it must be said that there is some progress after 30-odd years of work.
Again, show me the studies.
You assume because you are a nothing more than a blind sheep believing whatever the government tells you. You know as damn well as I do that our government is corrupt to its core, but you somehow believe that they would never ever lie to you about something related to medicine. And if you somehow believe that the government isn't completely corrupt you really need to brush up on your history.
It is in fact the only valid type of study accepted by the FDA for any medicine other than vaccines. Why do you think that they have such a lower bar for safety and efficacy testing for vaccines than other medicines?
Polio was the most misdiagnosed disease in history. There were several factors contributing to the prevalence of its diagnosis at that time. The primary two factors were DDT and the vaccine itself. It was not understood for several years afterward, but DDT toxicity causes guillain barre syndrome, which has symptom identical to paralytic polio. It was also being used everywhere, even put on food and sprayed directly on children. https://www.youtube.com/watch?...
The polio vaccine itself also caused guillain barre syndrome as well as spreading actual polio infection. Polio was "eradicated" by defining it almost completely out of existence. For instance, if a child who had gotten the polio vaccine showed signs of polio it was defined as non-polio paralysis. The criteria for diagnosing paralytic polio was changed from around a day of weakness or paralysis of a limb to a minimum of a week of weakness or paralysis.
As far as measles goes it was almost entirely eradicated before the vaccine was ever invented for it. Also in the decades leading up to the introduction of the vaccine less than 0.01% of cases resulted in death, less than the CDC claims the death rate is for flu. It was considered a trivial disease and parents would host measles parties so they could get it over with while their children were young. https://www.youtube.com/watch?...
Now, can you show me a double-blind placebo test for the efficacy or safety of a vaccine?
So, what the hell do you think the police carry around on patrol? Do they subdue criminals with hugs in your fantasy world?
What about the military? Do you think that a military carrying around sticks is going to deter another country from invading yours?
If you think that you are not surrounded by guns keeping you safe you need to seek professional help. Some of us just don't have the luxury of having police less than 5 minutes away at all times, so we have to arm ourselves in order to protect ourselves and our families, otherwise there is nobody there to do it.
Also, if you do not think there are people out there that will intentionally harm you I have a challenge for you. Walk all the way through your closest ghetto in an expensive suit with a little bit of money poking out of your pocket and then tell me there are no people out there who would harm you.
Not by any means. The hack involves putting a magnet to the gun to shoot it, or using a jammer to disable the gun. Both of these are incredibly easy to do.
I am just in complete awe of the overwhelming amount of thought you put into that comment...
Seriously, at least give us something that someone out there is dumb enough to go along with.
Well done! Illustrating the lies in the anti-gun lobby with a comparison to car safety laws.
For the idiots who were not paying attention:
- Not wearing a seatbelt is illegal in all states
- Disabling your airbag is also illegal in all states
Now, what about the argument that these "safety" features will not become mandated by law?
So, you are trying to tell us that a man does not have the right to end his own life?
I disagree. If a man doesn't have the right to end his own life then he is a slave with no rights.
Columbine was caused by psychotropic drugs being forced on children. The boys had been telling their parents, teachers, and councilors that they had been having vivid and terrifying hallucinations, as well as long periods of lost memory where they had no idea what they had been doing, since they had started the drugs they were being forced to take. They tried to get help, but everyone ignored them until it tragedy struck.
The NRA was first founded to protect the rights of black Americans to keep and bear arms. It was later infiltrated by democrats and started to advocate "reasonable" restrictions in order to slowly take away rights. Of course this disproportionately affects blacks and other minorities in the US, and that was the whole point of it in the first place. Gun laws, just like drug laws, have always been about racism.
I see you have been suckling on the gun-grabbing propaganda tit.
Your assertion is blatantly false. The countries with the greatest gun control have higher rates of mass shootings and murder rates. I haven't seen any credible statistics on toddlers killing themselves from other countries since they always hide that stuff as much as possible.
So, are all kids today just too stupid for such training....or is the problem we have too many stupid parents today who don't care to train their kids or discipline them on proper behavior (not just guns, but most anything in life)?
Without doubt it is the parents. There is also a lot of influence from school, but the parents have no excuse for not teaching their children about gun safety when they are young. If you do not know what a gun is, what it can do, and not to touch it by the time you are 5 then your parents are absolute failures. The same if you do not know how to shoot it by age 8.
Anything bad for the gun owner is considered a great idea by the communist loving left. The idea that a gun can be disabled from a distance makes their commie panties wet.
If it takes forcing a medical procedure on everyone else to save those very few, absolutely yes.
You should also look into the safety of vaccines beyond the sound bytes given by the CDC and other government agencies. They have an extremely large vested interest in promoting all vaccines they can. It is also their policy to deny all evidence that shines a bad light on vaccines, wether or not well substantiated.
It should also concern you that vaccine manufacturers are the only group that are completely immune to lawsuits over damage and death from proper use of their products. Keep in mind that these are the same corporations that have been found criminally liable many times over the last several decades for their other products which they do have liability for. What makes you think they will do better on the products which they have absolutely zero liability for and can convince to government to force you to take it?
Slashdot Mirror
Because that would make a boycott possible, and we can't have the proles being able to choose what they consume.
And that is how I know you are stupid.
Your cat would also love old-school antifreeze, but that doesn't mean that you should let your cat eat it. Cat food has to be mostly meat or else it will not provide nutrition to them. They cannot digest plants, they only eat them at all to aid in digestion of the actual food they eat, much like how many birds eat rocks to aid their digestion. The birds cannot digest the rocks and the cats cannot digest the grass.
You said something true again. You had better be careful, or you might devolve into a decent human being.
I'm honestly surprised you can still buy a kitchen knife in that shithole of a country.
You're right, it isn't the left specifically, it isn't the right either, it's women.
Right on the nose.
It wouldn't matter if there was not a single sex slave in the entire world women, as a whole, will always hate prostitution.
They hate prostitution for the same reason they hate sluts. Sluts lower their power over men by offering sex without extreme demands, same as prostitutes.
There is only one way to fix the problem. Get rid of all prostitution laws.
It was a marginal improvement, but it was a very small margin. At the same time it was a fucking giveaway to insurance companies.
You forgot about youtube.
Show me the studies.
Again, show me the studies.
You assume because you are a nothing more than a blind sheep believing whatever the government tells you. You know as damn well as I do that our government is corrupt to its core, but you somehow believe that they would never ever lie to you about something related to medicine. And if you somehow believe that the government isn't completely corrupt you really need to brush up on your history.
It is in fact the only valid type of study accepted by the FDA for any medicine other than vaccines. Why do you think that they have such a lower bar for safety and efficacy testing for vaccines than other medicines?
Polio was the most misdiagnosed disease in history. There were several factors contributing to the prevalence of its diagnosis at that time. The primary two factors were DDT and the vaccine itself. It was not understood for several years afterward, but DDT toxicity causes guillain barre syndrome, which has symptom identical to paralytic polio. It was also being used everywhere, even put on food and sprayed directly on children. https://www.youtube.com/watch?...
The polio vaccine itself also caused guillain barre syndrome as well as spreading actual polio infection. Polio was "eradicated" by defining it almost completely out of existence. For instance, if a child who had gotten the polio vaccine showed signs of polio it was defined as non-polio paralysis. The criteria for diagnosing paralytic polio was changed from around a day of weakness or paralysis of a limb to a minimum of a week of weakness or paralysis.
As far as measles goes it was almost entirely eradicated before the vaccine was ever invented for it. Also in the decades leading up to the introduction of the vaccine less than 0.01% of cases resulted in death, less than the CDC claims the death rate is for flu. It was considered a trivial disease and parents would host measles parties so they could get it over with while their children were young. https://www.youtube.com/watch?...
Now, can you show me a double-blind placebo test for the efficacy or safety of a vaccine?
So, what the hell do you think the police carry around on patrol? Do they subdue criminals with hugs in your fantasy world?
What about the military? Do you think that a military carrying around sticks is going to deter another country from invading yours?
If you think that you are not surrounded by guns keeping you safe you need to seek professional help. Some of us just don't have the luxury of having police less than 5 minutes away at all times, so we have to arm ourselves in order to protect ourselves and our families, otherwise there is nobody there to do it.
Also, if you do not think there are people out there that will intentionally harm you I have a challenge for you. Walk all the way through your closest ghetto in an expensive suit with a little bit of money poking out of your pocket and then tell me there are no people out there who would harm you.
Not by any means. The hack involves putting a magnet to the gun to shoot it, or using a jammer to disable the gun. Both of these are incredibly easy to do.
You already do. You just choose not to accept reality.
I am just in complete awe of the overwhelming amount of thought you put into that comment...
Seriously, at least give us something that someone out there is dumb enough to go along with.
Well done! Illustrating the lies in the anti-gun lobby with a comparison to car safety laws.
For the idiots who were not paying attention:
- Not wearing a seatbelt is illegal in all states
- Disabling your airbag is also illegal in all states
Now, what about the argument that these "safety" features will not become mandated by law?
So, you are trying to tell us that a man does not have the right to end his own life?
I disagree. If a man doesn't have the right to end his own life then he is a slave with no rights.
Columbine was caused by psychotropic drugs being forced on children. The boys had been telling their parents, teachers, and councilors that they had been having vivid and terrifying hallucinations, as well as long periods of lost memory where they had no idea what they had been doing, since they had started the drugs they were being forced to take. They tried to get help, but everyone ignored them until it tragedy struck.
The NRA was first founded to protect the rights of black Americans to keep and bear arms. It was later infiltrated by democrats and started to advocate "reasonable" restrictions in order to slowly take away rights. Of course this disproportionately affects blacks and other minorities in the US, and that was the whole point of it in the first place. Gun laws, just like drug laws, have always been about racism.
I see you have been suckling on the gun-grabbing propaganda tit.
Your assertion is blatantly false. The countries with the greatest gun control have higher rates of mass shootings and murder rates. I haven't seen any credible statistics on toddlers killing themselves from other countries since they always hide that stuff as much as possible.
Without doubt it is the parents. There is also a lot of influence from school, but the parents have no excuse for not teaching their children about gun safety when they are young. If you do not know what a gun is, what it can do, and not to touch it by the time you are 5 then your parents are absolute failures. The same if you do not know how to shoot it by age 8.
Anything bad for the gun owner is considered a great idea by the communist loving left. The idea that a gun can be disabled from a distance makes their commie panties wet.
Depends, if it was used properly the manufacturer is liable, otherwise the person who buckled the seatbelt. Now again, you answer the damn question.
If it takes forcing a medical procedure on everyone else to save those very few, absolutely yes.
You should also look into the safety of vaccines beyond the sound bytes given by the CDC and other government agencies. They have an extremely large vested interest in promoting all vaccines they can. It is also their policy to deny all evidence that shines a bad light on vaccines, wether or not well substantiated.
It should also concern you that vaccine manufacturers are the only group that are completely immune to lawsuits over damage and death from proper use of their products. Keep in mind that these are the same corporations that have been found criminally liable many times over the last several decades for their other products which they do have liability for. What makes you think they will do better on the products which they have absolutely zero liability for and can convince to government to force you to take it?