The nullity theorem depends on Infinity being defined as a number, Infinity is not a number it just like the + sign is not a number +/+ != 1 because + is not a number. Infinity is simply a concept that means "too big to be defined"
How about a solar farm in space? According to this 2001 article: http://www.space.com/businesstechnology/technology /solar_power_sats_011017-1.html NASA has a project looking at just that called Space Solar Power (SSP). It seems like it could be feasible, and solar cells in space would be able to capture light without concerns over weather then beam it back down to earth using microwaves. According to the article the biggest hurdle is launching the solar farm into space but with an increase in efficiency that means less solar cells and satellites would be needed.
Slashdot Mirror
you know a bot that kills bots
They have the worst customer service I've ever run into
The nullity theorem depends on Infinity being defined as a number, Infinity is not a number it just like the + sign is not a number +/+ != 1 because + is not a number. Infinity is simply a concept that means "too big to be defined"
You didn't read his proof correctly he only defines 0/0 as nullity 1/0 and 0/1 are not defined as nullity
How about a solar farm in space? According to this 2001 article: http://www.space.com/businesstechnology/technology /solar_power_sats_011017-1.html NASA has a project looking at just that called Space Solar Power (SSP). It seems like it could be feasible, and solar cells in space would be able to capture light without concerns over weather then beam it back down to earth using microwaves. According to the article the biggest hurdle is launching the solar farm into space but with an increase in efficiency that means less solar cells and satellites would be needed.