If stuff's broken and there's no magic binary patch to fix it (that doesn't break something else critical), under MS-Windows it stays broken. Under Linux, there's practically always a way - and that post demonstrates it.
You really should read your own dribble every now and then. How many people you know go through the patches line by line. And how many of those actually know what has been done.
Slashdot Mirror
Yes, because your guess matters.
I wouldnt waste time, call up Bush and let him know.
yes, cynical.
"PR burns them bad.", yes because they really fear backlash from people who already hate them.
I am sure they have called an emergency conference to deal with this explosive issue.
you're retarded.
"GIMP is good enough"
haha, funny how "good enough" is supposed to satisfy everyone.
// NOTE: Support level is actually DX level * 10 + subversion // So, 70 = DX7, 80 = DX8, 81 = DX8 w/ 1.4 pixel shaders, etc. // NOTE: 82 = NVidia nv3x cards, which can't run dx9 fast
in shaderapidx8...
This looks suspiciously like the real thing.
Gotta love how a post with questionable merit gets a +5 insightful :P
Go weenies!
*hint* Try whois.
I guess we'll have to wait till 5 is in production.
Honestly, cut the crap. Show me how PHP has better OO than C#. Can you catch exceptions ?
nono, you block if there is a header that's not yours. You permit empty headers.
You can't stop them all but at least you arent denying access.
Agreed, I won't make up my mind till there is a full analysis of production drivers.
http://www.3dgpu.com/modules/wfsection/article.php ?articleid=74&page=0
http://www.3dgpu.com/modules/wfsection/article.php ?articleid=74&page=0
I wonder why they had to decrease IQ if their shader support was as good as you claim.
I agree. I've been using a TX2000 on one of our FreeBSD servers and I'm happy to say I havn't hit any snags.
I can't verify the linux claim but I would hope the company would make more of an effort.
Hah, so normal users will be powring over the code before they install a patch.
Sorry, I forgot how trivial a VM or scheduler are these days.
Binary patches are evil, you're right.
Yup, I'm sure those figures are accurate.
Sorry, my mistake.
You really should read your own dribble every now and then. How many people you know go through the patches line by line. And how many of those actually know what has been done.
Sorry, come again :)
So you still say you can't patch windows but you can patch linux. Or have you decided to steer away from that ?
Is it broken ?
He didn't make his own kerneldid he ?
And guess what there are drivers/patches for windows. How does it STAY broken ?
Ahh, so because you don't know of any people using it. It dosn't exist ? It's an issue, don't deny it.
No, here's another wow, another It IS a problem and DOES exist.
Not bad hardware. Why can't you accept it ?
Ahh, fair enough. Got confused for a sec :)
In either case, this is something I know alot of my friends in the states would be happy with.
Maybe in time, with a new gov.
Jealousy brings out the worst in people :)
This is quite good news. I'm glad we aren't following the US.
:)
I love living here
should it ?
Point is linux can crash. Don't blam windows if drivers crash it as well.
You still have yet to dispute the ATA and SMP issues. Do they not exist ?