Ever since I was a small boy trying to get the FM reception just right, I've always wanted to pay for radio.
Not just listen to advertisements, That's not enough of a contribution.
Oh, and I wanted it to sound like it was in a box, with lots of neat clipping and compression artifacts, instead of free fuzzy fm frequencies.
Some stranger without a coat asked me to buy crack the other day, I declined but I realize that it is probably his livelihood, his profits allow him to eat and smoke crack for another day. Is it moral and ethical for me to refuse, and deny this man what he requires?
If you're even bothering to ask this question, then i believe you might not want to do it. School filters are annoying; the favor you would be doing is immense. But as to whether or not it is moral or not: is P2P, bittorrent, are pirates and people who share moral? Yes, question with a question. Why are you asking this question. ?.
The reaction of Boston and the severity of the whole thing; I still can't decide if the entire thing is a joke or not. Life, that is. I can't decide whether or not life is a joke now. As hard as he can is apparently much harder than we thought.
You should still keep your wifi open...
a criminal needs to be in geographic proximity. wow. This is so much worse than someone on the other side of the country being able to break into your machine.
Honestly, if we all keep our wifis open it'll be better in the long run. I don't know why it just will be i swear.
The thing I always wonder when it comes to a moon colony is Will we do something that fucks with the moon's rotation/the earth's tides = ?
Is anyone concerned about this? I suppose in the beginning we won't have much impact. Just like industrialization and global warming. (Joke; They gazed upon their coal darkened skies and took a deep breath of elation, seeing smog filled skies as a sign of their(our) progress.)
In order to get normal people to understand what impact net neutrality will have on them we need to fight the TV ads which conclude "NET NEUTRALITY: BAD FOR THE CONSUMER" and create an analogy they can understand.
Although comparing the internet to highways is only marginally better than a "series of tubes" bear with me.
In its simplest form people can drive on roads. Businesses can transport goods by way of them. In fact, even data can be transported on the highway, on roads. So, in order for you to get your camo gear, guns and tobacco from walmart at everyday low prices, walmart uses the same roads as everyone else and there is no tiered system that you, the consumer, has to pay attention to. So there's more walmart trucks on the road and now it's harder to get to work and in fact harder to get to walmart. Thus is the limitation of the highway system.
Net neutrality gives you the option to ignore all the walmart trucks on the road instead of paying for it in the long run. (because if the walmart trucks have to pay more to get to walmart, walmart's going to raise their prices.)
has anyone seen that net neutrality ad? I think they tried to slip that one in there without us noticing. IT totally goes off the series of pipes idea.
Slashdot Mirror
;or should we try to guide their evolution towards a less violent path so they don't turn out like us.
Now I can eat subs raw
Ever since I was a small boy trying to get the FM reception just right, I've always wanted to pay for radio.
Not just listen to advertisements, That's not enough of a contribution.
Oh, and I wanted it to sound like it was in a box, with lots of neat clipping and compression artifacts, instead of free fuzzy fm frequencies.
Never pass a cop.
Some stranger without a coat asked me to buy crack the other day, I declined but I realize that it is probably his livelihood, his profits allow him to eat and smoke crack for another day. Is it moral and ethical for me to refuse, and deny this man what he requires?
great Firewall. Excellent. Really, really like that.
If you're even bothering to ask this question, then i believe you might not want to do it. School filters are annoying; the favor you would be doing is immense. But as to whether or not it is moral or not: is P2P, bittorrent, are pirates and people who share moral? Yes, question with a question. Why are you asking this question. ?.
I guess I'd have to stop reloading slashdot every 9 seconds.
I want a floating quad.
I'd say that Apple is just becoming what Sony was and still thinks it is. So it's more likely that Apple is going to release the ibox station 4.
You need to clean your house. Got clean house on your clean house. Clean house. house clean.
The reaction of Boston and the severity of the whole thing; I still can't decide if the entire thing is a joke or not. Life, that is. I can't decide whether or not life is a joke now. As hard as he can is apparently much harder than we thought.
You should still keep your wifi open... a criminal needs to be in geographic proximity. wow. This is so much worse than someone on the other side of the country being able to break into your machine. Honestly, if we all keep our wifis open it'll be better in the long run. I don't know why it just will be i swear.
Don't you think it's time to close your windows?
(we're just going to LOVE our new shiny chrome plated moon; It's day all day!)
The thing I always wonder when it comes to a moon colony is Will we do something that fucks with the moon's rotation/the earth's tides = ?
Is anyone concerned about this? I suppose in the beginning we won't have much impact. Just like industrialization and global warming. (Joke; They gazed upon their coal darkened skies and took a deep breath of elation, seeing smog filled skies as a sign of their(our) progress.)
This is true. Boston couldn't handle a mooninite. Can Nasa handle all of them? (who knows how many more there are)
How about 6 years of experience sitting on a computer all day? DOING EVERYTHING.
fewest customers. They don't have enough customers to have the most dropped calls.
In order to get normal people to understand what impact net neutrality will have on them we need to fight the TV ads which conclude "NET NEUTRALITY: BAD FOR THE CONSUMER" and create an analogy they can understand.
Although comparing the internet to highways is only marginally better than a "series of tubes" bear with me.
In its simplest form people can drive on roads. Businesses can transport goods by way of them. In fact, even data can be transported on the highway, on roads. So, in order for you to get your camo gear, guns and tobacco from walmart at everyday low prices, walmart uses the same roads as everyone else and there is no tiered system that you, the consumer, has to pay attention to. So there's more walmart trucks on the road and now it's harder to get to work and in fact harder to get to walmart. Thus is the limitation of the highway system.
Net neutrality gives you the option to ignore all the walmart trucks on the road instead of paying for it in the long run. (because if the walmart trucks have to pay more to get to walmart, walmart's going to raise their prices.)
has anyone seen that net neutrality ad? I think they tried to slip that one in there without us noticing. IT totally goes off the series of pipes idea.