Slashdot Mirror


User: Pig+Hogger

Pig+Hogger's activity in the archive.

Stories
0
Comments
5,650
First seen
Last seen
Profile
(view on slashdot.org)

Comments · 5,650

  1. Re:Its a matter of where you have a location on Geographical Borders on the Web · · Score: 2
    The US has been accused of a variety of antisemitic activities in history -- including the rejection of a boat load of Jewish refugees during the Nazi era, and a variety of industrial relationships with the Nazis that could be taken as condoning if not aiding the rise of the Nazis.
    Plenty of american universities did not accept jews; the same went for clubs and other social organizations. Mc-Gill University in Canada, as well as Queens University in Toronto had, until the 1960's, very strict quotas towards the jews. And plenty of canadian clubs (in the british sense) has "NO JEWS" signs in plain view on their doors.

    Isaac Asimov was not accepted in Columbia University, even though he had perfect grades. It was simply because he was a jew.

    --

  2. Re:An analogy. on Geographical Borders on the Web · · Score: 2
    Say a pornographer places a billboard of a beautiful naked woman near the border between his agnostic nation with its liberal sex and speech laws, and a fanatically religious one with censorious blue laws and no freedom of speech. But he covers it up during the day and uncovers it only on cloudy, moonless nights.

    Then say a person from the tyrannical nation starts showing up at the border on those nights with a flashlight and a pair of binoculars.

    (setting: a Sheriff's office, whose occupant is busy whittling a piece of wood, his feet comfortably lodged besides the telephone)

    [PHONE RINGS] - Sherrif picks it up

    - Sheriff's office... Yes... Yes miss Smedley, how are you... What? Oh, the kids are swimming naked in Sawmill Creek besides your house? Fine, I'll go tell them. That's fine. Thank-you.

    * * *

    (One day later, same setting, same phone, same sheriff, piece of wood has dwindled to a lone splinter).

    [PHONE RINGS] - Sherrif picks it up

    - Sheriffs's office... Hi, miss Smedl... Hey, hey, cool off!!! What? ... You say that the kids are *STILL* swimming naked in the creek? But that's impossible: they promised me yesterday that they would move a quarter of a mile downstreams. ... That's what they did? Well, you should not see them anymore! What? ... With binoculars you can see them?

    --

  3. Re:Goddard was a racist on 75 Years Ago, Goddard Launchs Space Age · · Score: 2
    I too am sad that brilliant people like Goddard and Heisenberg supported the Nazis.
    Sheesh. How about Wernher Von-Braun???

    (Invited to the same TV show as Von-Braun, Isaac Asimov refused to shake a hand that shook Hitler's...)

    --

  4. Re:Goddard was a bad scientist on 75 Years Ago, Goddard Launchs Space Age · · Score: 2
    ...but it fails for more complex science, like rocketry (or large-scale software development).
    You mean to say that large-scale software development isn't rocket science?

    --

  5. Re:Rocket age on 75 Years Ago, Goddard Launchs Space Age · · Score: 2
    That's rocket age. Not space age. The space age began in 1957 with the launch of Sputnik.
    Nah, the ROCKET AGE began some 2000+ years ago, when some hapless Chinese fucked-up rolling his firecracker; an end was loose, and the rapidly burning gases managed to propel the thing away, probably scaring a couple of horses, or better yet, the mother-in-law in the process.

    Perhaps you mean the LIQUID-FUELED ROCKET AGE? Well, no luck either, because it is totally meaningless, given that the largest payloads launched today (including the Space Shuttle) are launched in part by SOLID-FUELED rockets...

    --

  6. Re:Only where people are concerned... on Patenting RPC Compression? · · Score: 2
    I don't know of any country that does not have to deal with individuals or groups that engage in unethical practices for personal gain without fear of repercusions because of some clever loophole or a vacuum in existing legislation.
    Indeed. In France, someone was able to patent a " machine that proves the existence of god "...

    --

  7. Re:Nation states??? on The Net Revolution's Backlash · · Score: 2
    What is a nation state and how is it different from a nation?
    A nation-state is a nation which has it's own state, say, like Denmark, which is a country populated with Danish people.

    Some nations are incorporated (either willingly or by force) into a larger state (or country) that has other nations alongside; like Switzerland, who has a German, a French, an Italian and a Romansh nations.

    --

  8. Nation states??? on The Net Revolution's Backlash · · Score: 2
    We don't have a paperless world; work isn't easier, or even demonstrably more efficient; nation-states are not disintegrating; the new global economy hasn't improved the lot of the vast majority of the world'
    What's wrong with NATION-STATES ????

    --

  9. When will people learn? on Sophomore Uses List Context; Cops Interrogate · · Score: 3
    When will people learn that the STATE is NOT the worse thing out there? Private entities are far more dangerous to people, simply because they only have to answer to their shareholders, and that people have been proven again and again that greediness will not stop people from hurting other people.

    It is time for the americans to extend their much beloved constitution to the private sector!!!!

    --

  10. Re:I think things will get worse in the far future on Even Programmers Get the Job Search Blues · · Score: 2
    We started of with machine code, moved into assembler, then to Fortran, then C, C++, and so *FORTH*.
    Indeed, so FORTH, so FORTH...

    Forth like you if honk then

    --

  11. Re:Dark times are these.... again on Even More Surveillance Cameras For England · · Score: 2

    The foundation of the US is that the people have the power and right to replace their government, through the use of force if ncessary, when the government is corrupt. If you take away the guns, you take away the last illusion that this right still exists.
    The fact that, despite that they can CHANGE their corrupt government by democratic, that is, non-violent means, that they haven't done it, means that the american people have lost the right to even have arms, because they won't use the peaceful means they have at their disposal.

    --

  12. Re:Cellphone Jammers. on Even More Surveillance Cameras For England · · Score: 2
    The answer is simple. Get a Cellphone jammer, and you can walk around undetected.

    If the picture on the site is anything to go by, the cameras are lowish quality, and look mosly down, and thus can not see people at long distances.

    How about a camera jammer?

    CCDs in nowadays cameras are sensitive to IR radiation. Have a test: fire-up that webcam of yours, grab your trusty TV remote control and fire away.

    Chance is that you'll see light coming from the remote. That's the IR beam, boys.

    So, now make yourself a canvas hat studded with IR LEDs, wire them all up, and just walk around. The IR will simply outshine whatever ambiant light is reflected off your face, and you won't be identifiable on camera, as you will look with a saint with a halo of light...

    --

  13. Re:Which would you prefer: Cameras or Guns? on Even More Surveillance Cameras For England · · Score: 2
    Why doesn't anyone ever bring up Switzerland (every male over the age of 18 is *required* to have a gun, and there are little or no shootings)?
    Must be because it's MANDATORY...

    --

  14. Re:Let's hear from the Brits on Even More Surveillance Cameras For England · · Score: 2
    There are a number of serious issues, particularly those arising from emergency legislation pertaining to the Troubles in Northern Ireland and our lack of a constitution.
    If the fuckin' limeys butted-out of Northern Ireland, there'd be no trouble there.

    Whenever the fuckin' limeys stick their stinkin' noses somewhere in the world (India, Kuwait), there's ALLWAYS trouble to follow.

    --

  15. Re:Let's hear from the Brits on Even More Surveillance Cameras For England · · Score: 2
    Well, I for one am quite happy to see these cameras in use in Britain. There is actually quite a lot of violence/crime on the streets here.
    Didn't it occur to anyone that the increased crime rate could be related to the suveillance cameras????

    --

  16. Being there on "Online Privacy Alliance" Claims Privacy Too Expensive · · Score: 2

    Remember that wonderful movie with Peter Sellers, Being There ? (here, too).

    Here is a guy with the ultimate privacy: absolutely NO RECORD AT ALL, and when the President of the United States asks the FBI to do a background check on him, and when they come back totally empty-handed, the big-shots really start to shit in their pants, and some even think of having him run for president (I guess that's a prophecy of Ronald Reagan)...

    --

  17. Pionner in peer-to-peer? Helloooo???? on Peer-to-Peer Overview · · Score: 2

    Napster will likely be remembered not so much for enabling music piracy as for starting a revolution that changed the way the Internet worked.

    Napster is the pioneer of a technology known as peer-to-peer networking, or P2P for short. The core idea of P2P is to allow individual computers to communicate directly over the Internet.

    Er? Am I missing something here? Isn't "The Internet" already a peer-to-peer network???? Hasn't it always been????


    --

  18. Re:As an experiment... on Is Crypto Solely for Criminals? · · Score: 2
    Most importantly, did you stop using it after that memo???

    --

  19. Re:keeping it private on Is Crypto Solely for Criminals? · · Score: 3
    Not only that, but the government could then use that key to impersonate you, forging any document they want and digitally signing it.
    Now, can someone explain to me why anglo-saxons are so fucking paranoid about their democratically-elected governments to the point that they are afraid that those same governments would go to the length of impersonating them????

    Why the fuck would a government impersonate it's citizens????

    Why the fuck a government attempt to screw it's citizens (unless, of course, it's been totally subverted) ???? And why citizens instead of ranting about that would actually do something about it, like vote them out of office????

    Why those incredible assaults come from countries where individual rights are paramount???? France doesn't have as high a reputation for individual rights as anglo-saxon countries, yet there are no widespread perception of wholesale government spying on and impersonating their citizens!!!!

    Must be some collective neurosis...

    --

  20. Re:Switching on Fiddler on the RUF · · Score: 2


    Monorail.org has a nice page on how monorails switch.

    The short summary. Yes, it is possible using various techniques (flexible/segmented sections of monorail beam, beam replacement, etc.).

    The page also explains that the "monorails can't switch" myth was due to a particularly bad and bulky implementation at Wuppertal, and that the myth has since been perpetuated by various shady sources such as Microsoft Encarta.

    Monorail switches are *STILL* more complex than "normal" bi-rail switches. Their moving parts are such an important proportion of the total infrastructure that their mechanism will always be more onerous, complex, slow-moving and cumbersome than bi-rail switches.

    This has profound impacts on many aspects, who all eventually touch safety:

    • It takes longer to turn a switch.
      A mainline bi-rail switch can be turned and secured in less than 30 seconds.
    • Monorail switches are quite bulky and complex, has they often have to move the whole track about (isn't that funny that those two pictures are taken from the "switch myth" page of the monorail.org website???)
      Birail switches mechanisms are wholly contained within the track cross section, and their actuating mechanism be very unobtrusive.
    • Since monorail switches have to move the whole track about, the length of the switches is necessarly restricted to practicability, and this has a direct bearing on the speed they can be negociated in reverse position (the shorter they are, the slower you have to go through).
      The French Train à Grande Vitesse switches can be taken as fast as 150 miles per hour in reverse position.
    • Derailments on monorail will very often send the whole train flying through the air, crashing below.
      Birail derailments can be as benign as a wheel on the ground that can be re-railed within minutes by the train crew using a re-railer frog (the yellow Y-shaped tool near the rear of the engine - sorry, that's the best I could find in 10 minutes on Google). And birail viaduct tracks are required to have guard rails inside the track anyway to prevent derailed cars to leave the track.
    • Signalling systems must take account of this by having a longer safety margin where a train can be brought to a safe stop in case a switch doesn't turn properly.
    • This means a greater distance between trains and thus a lower capacity for each track.
    • By being more complex, switches are more expensive. In turn, there will be less switches on the network, making it less efficient and more difficult to go around a problem (like a disabled train).
    • The single-beam track may seem sleek and more efficient than a heavy viaduct, but you *NEED* to have a way of quickly evacuating a train in case of emergency. So you will need a catwalk that is parallel to the tracks, the structure of which will destroy much of the sleekness of the beam track.
  21. Re:This ought to really catch on with Americans on Fiddler on the RUF · · Score: 2

    Unfortunately while it makes sense, yuppies won't touch it. An SUV made for rails is an SUV that's not "made to go off the beaten trail". Therefore, it's not any great show of excess when you get one and proceed to keep it on city streets. If it's not a show of excess, what's the point?

    Well, they could very well be enticed with roller-coaster like t^hrails in the mountains... They could then buy their SUV by the G-rating they have rather than engine power or whatnot...


    --

  22. Re:Explain slowly... on Scientology vs. Panoussis Ruling · · Score: 2
    w h e r e S c i e n t o l o g y a c c u s e s P a n o u s s i s o f c o p y r i g h t i n f r i n g e m e n t o f r e l i g i o u s t r a d e s e c r e t s

    Now I will ask the question again: how can a religion have trade secrets?

    The proper question should rather be: "how can a trade secret be copyrighted???".

    --

  23. Re:makes you wonder... on FBI: Massive MS Exploits Over Last Year · · Score: 2
    Not even the cracker who did it?

    --

  24. Oh, good! on Single-Atom Transistor · · Score: 2
    Then, the notched electron is not too far off... :)

    (What was the title of that story, by the way?)

    --

  25. Re:Speaking of Vietnam Protests... on Is Hacktivism Robin Hood Politics? · · Score: 3

    There's a critical difference between Tianamen and Kent State. The National Guardsmen at Kent State were not acting under orders when they opened fire. They were simply a bunch of nervous kids who reacted poorly in a situation they were not adequately trained to handle. One of them started shooting, and the others got spooked and did the same

    Totally irrelevent. That national guard was acting on behalf of Authority, and as such, the Authority is just as responsible for the Kent State massacre as the chinese Authority is of the Tienanmen square massacre.


    --