What is this TTP thing that you are mentioning? This thread is about TPP isn't it? As a resident of New Zealand, one of the countries heavily involved in the creation of the TPP, I have to say that I hope and pray that the TPP does not see the light of day. It imposes American corporate will on us little guys in a most ugly way. Unnecessarily heavy-handed IP laws combined with hideously expensive drugs combined with the right of multinational corporations to overturn our local regulations make it intolerable. I do not want to live with it in place.
I have understood that difference likely since before you were born. I spent a good piece of my career creating code to run embedded on small devices (and some not so small). No, I don't think "dinkypoo" is on the money. I was trying to compliment/encourage "slowdeath", who I think has a really good understanding of the issue. I find your rudeness to be really quite intolerable.
Thank you for shedding some useful light on this discussion. It is in danger of sliding off the rails. Education of "modern" coders seems to have omitted teaching programming history and the evolution of programming technology.
Counter-intuitive? Maybe, but what you are saying here is largely the argument used 50+ years ago in developing RISC (Reduced Instruction Set Computers), the technology which led to the first so-called supercomputers capable of sustained operation at megaflop+ speeds. Although I have not kept up with today's chip architectures all that carefully, I am sure that many of the characteristics of RISC continue to be present.
I always thought SNOBOL was that language where every string meant something to the compiler. When I was writing code in Perl, I did not feel as though that were true of Perl.
Everyone must have a different story, here's a bit of mine: In 1960 I went off to college, and had a chance to register for the first undergraduate course in programming that had ever been offered there. Computers were not a big part of everyday life then, and the idea of programming was very exotic and enticing to a young lad. I dove right in with only the fuzziest notion of what I was getting into. I was really really lucky to have Alan J Perlis (later the first recipient of the Turing Award) as my instructor for that class. He was simply amazing, and the most friendly teacher I had that freshman year.
We started learning to program in assembly language, and did a fair number of puzzle-solving problems, many having to do with moving pieces on a chess board. That really makes one have to think about data structures and abstractions of physical reality without beating you up. Also, we had all-time access to the computer (IBM 650) and wound up spending a lot of evenings feeding cards into its maw. That class showed me what I wanted to do with my career. I wanted to make computers be able to do things that had not been done before.
The undergraduate programming class went on for two semesters. After that everything I learned was self-taught, and sometimes quite a struggle as techniques and technologies continued to evolve.
In those days, computer science and programming were really new, and had not found their place in academia quite yet. I was mostly advised to continue studing a more traditional subject, though I really wanted to pursue programming. I finished my student career with a PhD in theoretical chemistry, but it was really a sneaky way to do more programming and play with computers.
I am still of the opinion that coding should be learnt first from assembly language level, and then get progressively more abstract. When you are coding at the machine instruction level, you really have to learn what the machine can and cannot do, and I think that informs programming for the rest of your career.
New Zealand, too. GST is applied to pretty much everything. My pet peeve is the GST that is applied to "rates", the (non) tax that property owners pay to local councils. Since they are not called "tax" they must not be "tax", but it sure feels like a tax on tax to me.
Turing was gay and he was on of the few British that actually did anything in the early computer field. That's why we hear about him, not because of his accomplishments, which were few and unimportant.
If his accomplishments were so unimportant, then why is the preeminent award in computing named for him? And why are his papers used as the foundation for much of Computer Science?
And if you think the British were little active in the early days of computing, I suggest you go and study your history better.
No doubt, this is a substantial reason why the government does not do the bill.
Another big reason is that in many (most?) other countries the number of exceptions (deductions, exemptions, etc.) is much smaller, so it is much easier for the government to figure your taxes based on your income reported from the employer. I live in NZ, and I would say the average guy does not file a return. If every scrap of income he made was from a job, or bank interest, or pension payments, or dividends lodged with a broker, then the government has already taxed those things at source and there is nothing more to be said.
On the other hand, there are some items which can be claimed to reduce tax that the government may not know about. This leads to an entire industry in NZ which helps people figure out if they have a refund coming that they did not know about. Most people do not.
And I have been very satisfied every year using Turbotax to prepare my US returns from NZ. The ability to link to financial institutions and automatically download the data is a real plus. For several years Intuit did not allow one to efile with a foreign address, but now they do, and that is icing on the cake.
For weight and space reasons I travel with only my wifi-only tablet. Generally that works well for me.
Every now and then I encounter a hotel with only wired access provided in rooms. (Often they have wifi in public areas.) Is there an answer to using the wifi-only device in such a circumstance. For sake of argument, let's assume I am an international traveller whose cellphone never works in the countries I visit. (True) That means the hotspot method mentioned will not work.
If at 23:59:59 the clock actually changes to 23:59:60 (= 00:00:00), then a second has been taken away, not added. The second denoted 23:59:59 did not happen.
I would think that to "add" a leap second, at 00:00:00 the clock should read 23:59:59.
I live in a non-US country. My family is all in the US. For years, before I left the US, it was my habit to purchase Netflix Gift Subscriptions for family members. I used to do this online, and was no trouble at all.
Now, because I connect from a foreign location, Netflix will not talk to me at all. Even though I am trying to buy a gift for someone in the US using a US$ credit card based at a US address, I have no hope. Neflix simply refuses to do any business with me because I come in from a foreign address.
I fear that the forthcoming TPPA agreemwnt will do this and a host of other nasty tweaks to how we live our lives. The fact that it is being done in secrecy is chilling. I just hope we can keep big pharma's clutches off our drug purchasing services.
Exactly! Plenty of people in the world outside the US and Europe would like to be able to legally consume the content. In most situations, the content providers will not provide it to those people, not for ANY price. So some use VPNs, etc to try to get the content that others can get -- and the copyright owners want to shut them out instead of trying to find a way to accept their money. Makes no sense to me.
The credit card number does encode the issuing bank, and that determines the currency that the card works in. If I was in country X with a credit card from country Y, I certainly would not use that card to make regular, recurring purchases in country X. Every such transaction would be treated as a foreign transaction, with accompanying transaction and exchange fees.
It was substantially better, but you really cannot expect me to remember details after 30 years!
At the time, I was most struck by how many people would post results deriving from C-coded benchmark programs where the thing actually measured was different from what was purported to be measured, largely from ignorance.
Given how long these libraries have existed, I am surprised there are still opportunities for improvement such as that described in the TFA.
Back in the mid-80s I was involved in the design of a "mini Cray" supercomputer. We did not yet have any hardware to run on, but we did have a software simulator, and we wanted to publish some "whetstone" numbers. We got some numbers, were not too happy with them, and really dug in to analyze what we could do to improve them. The Whetstone code was in C, and used a fair number of library functions to both accomplish the numerical results and the preparation of the Whetstone answer. It turned out that most of the time was being spent in string copy and string compare functions from the library. We concentrated our efforts on redoing those library routines in assembly to take advantage of as many register-to-register operations and multiple-byte operations as we could. Although the Whetstone benchmark was supposed to measure numerical performance, our results showed that the numerical calculations took up little of the time.
Sadly, our "mini Cray" never saw the light of day. The mid-80s were a tough time to stand out in that arena as there were so many people trying to do the same thing.
Lastly, when paying, use PayPal since they cover your ass if/when a seller doesn't come through. It has happened to me before twice in like 7 years and PayPal has helped me out and refunded my money both times.
I would have to disagree with that. My mileage did vary.
A couple of years ago I used Paypal to buy a product that was never shipped. The vendor ignored my complaint, and Paypal equally ignored my complaint. And I mean IGNORED.
Slashdot Mirror
Where will you go when the trade war between US and Mexico shuts down travel between the two countries?
I think it will be far more than 5 years and far less than 5 decades.
What is this TTP thing that you are mentioning? This thread is about TPP isn't it? As a resident of New Zealand, one of the countries heavily involved in the creation of the TPP, I have to say that I hope and pray that the TPP does not see the light of day. It imposes American corporate will on us little guys in a most ugly way. Unnecessarily heavy-handed IP laws combined with hideously expensive drugs combined with the right of multinational corporations to overturn our local regulations make it intolerable. I do not want to live with it in place.
I have understood that difference likely since before you were born. I spent a good piece of my career creating code to run embedded on small devices (and some not so small). No, I don't think "dinkypoo" is on the money. I was trying to compliment/encourage "slowdeath", who I think has a really good understanding of the issue. I find your rudeness to be really quite intolerable.
Thank you for shedding some useful light on this discussion. It is in danger of sliding off the rails. Education of "modern" coders seems to have omitted teaching programming history and the evolution of programming technology.
Counter-intuitive? Maybe, but what you are saying here is largely the argument used 50+ years ago in developing RISC (Reduced Instruction Set Computers), the technology which led to the first so-called supercomputers capable of sustained operation at megaflop+ speeds. Although I have not kept up with today's chip architectures all that carefully, I am sure that many of the characteristics of RISC continue to be present.
I always thought SNOBOL was that language where every string meant something to the compiler. When I was writing code in Perl, I did not feel as though that were true of Perl.
Everyone must have a different story, here's a bit of mine: In 1960 I went off to college, and had a chance to register for the first undergraduate course in programming that had ever been offered there. Computers were not a big part of everyday life then, and the idea of programming was very exotic and enticing to a young lad. I dove right in with only the fuzziest notion of what I was getting into. I was really really lucky to have Alan J Perlis (later the first recipient of the Turing Award) as my instructor for that class. He was simply amazing, and the most friendly teacher I had that freshman year.
We started learning to program in assembly language, and did a fair number of puzzle-solving problems, many having to do with moving pieces on a chess board. That really makes one have to think about data structures and abstractions of physical reality without beating you up. Also, we had all-time access to the computer (IBM 650) and wound up spending a lot of evenings feeding cards into its maw. That class showed me what I wanted to do with my career. I wanted to make computers be able to do things that had not been done before.
The undergraduate programming class went on for two semesters. After that everything I learned was self-taught, and sometimes quite a struggle as techniques and technologies continued to evolve.
In those days, computer science and programming were really new, and had not found their place in academia quite yet. I was mostly advised to continue studing a more traditional subject, though I really wanted to pursue programming. I finished my student career with a PhD in theoretical chemistry, but it was really a sneaky way to do more programming and play with computers.
I am still of the opinion that coding should be learnt first from assembly language level, and then get progressively more abstract. When you are coding at the machine instruction level, you really have to learn what the machine can and cannot do, and I think that informs programming for the rest of your career.
New Zealand, too. GST is applied to pretty much everything. My pet peeve is the GST that is applied to "rates", the (non) tax that property owners pay to local councils. Since they are not called "tax" they must not be "tax", but it sure feels like a tax on tax to me.
Turing was gay and he was on of the few British that actually did anything in the early computer field. That's why we hear about him, not because of his accomplishments, which were few and unimportant.
If his accomplishments were so unimportant, then why is the preeminent award in computing named for him? And why are his papers used as the foundation for much of Computer Science?
And if you think the British were little active in the early days of computing, I suggest you go and study your history better.
No doubt, this is a substantial reason why the government does not do the bill.
Another big reason is that in many (most?) other countries the number of exceptions (deductions, exemptions, etc.) is much smaller, so it is much easier for the government to figure your taxes based on your income reported from the employer. I live in NZ, and I would say the average guy does not file a return. If every scrap of income he made was from a job, or bank interest, or pension payments, or dividends lodged with a broker, then the government has already taxed those things at source and there is nothing more to be said.
On the other hand, there are some items which can be claimed to reduce tax that the government may not know about. This leads to an entire industry in NZ which helps people figure out if they have a refund coming that they did not know about. Most people do not.
And I have been very satisfied every year using Turbotax to prepare my US returns from NZ. The ability to link to financial institutions and automatically download the data is a real plus. For several years Intuit did not allow one to efile with a foreign address, but now they do, and that is icing on the cake.
For weight and space reasons I travel with only my wifi-only tablet. Generally that works well for me.
Every now and then I encounter a hotel with only wired access provided in rooms. (Often they have wifi in public areas.) Is there an answer to using the wifi-only device in such a circumstance. For sake of argument, let's assume I am an international traveller whose cellphone never works in the countries I visit. (True) That means the hotspot method mentioned will not work.
I find this confusing.
If at 23:59:59 the clock actually changes to 23:59:60 (= 00:00:00), then a second has been taken away, not added. The second denoted 23:59:59 did not happen.
I would think that to "add" a leap second, at 00:00:00 the clock should read 23:59:59.
Can someone clarify?
I live in a non-US country. My family is all in the US. For years, before I left the US, it was my habit to purchase Netflix Gift Subscriptions for family members. I used to do this online, and was no trouble at all.
Now, because I connect from a foreign location, Netflix will not talk to me at all. Even though I am trying to buy a gift for someone in the US using a US$ credit card based at a US address, I have no hope. Neflix simply refuses to do any business with me because I come in from a foreign address.
I find that to be really absurd.
I fear that the forthcoming TPPA agreemwnt will do this and a host of other nasty tweaks to how we live our lives. The fact that it is being done in secrecy is chilling. I just hope we can keep big pharma's clutches off our drug purchasing services.
Exactly! Plenty of people in the world outside the US and Europe would like to be able to legally consume the content. In most situations, the content providers will not provide it to those people, not for ANY price. So some use VPNs, etc to try to get the content that others can get -- and the copyright owners want to shut them out instead of trying to find a way to accept their money. Makes no sense to me.
Well, we don't know the details yet, but your surmise will likely be borne out. Everything is more expensive in the antipodes.
The credit card number does encode the issuing bank, and that determines the currency that the card works in. If I was in country X with a credit card from country Y, I certainly would not use that card to make regular, recurring purchases in country X. Every such transaction would be treated as a foreign transaction, with accompanying transaction and exchange fees.
Seems to me they should get the content they subscribed "to".
It was substantially better, but you really cannot expect me to remember details after 30 years! At the time, I was most struck by how many people would post results deriving from C-coded benchmark programs where the thing actually measured was different from what was purported to be measured, largely from ignorance.
Given how long these libraries have existed, I am surprised there are still opportunities for improvement such as that described in the TFA.
Back in the mid-80s I was involved in the design of a "mini Cray" supercomputer. We did not yet have any hardware to run on, but we did have a software simulator, and we wanted to publish some "whetstone" numbers. We got some numbers, were not too happy with them, and really dug in to analyze what we could do to improve them. The Whetstone code was in C, and used a fair number of library functions to both accomplish the numerical results and the preparation of the Whetstone answer. It turned out that most of the time was being spent in string copy and string compare functions from the library. We concentrated our efforts on redoing those library routines in assembly to take advantage of as many register-to-register operations and multiple-byte operations as we could. Although the Whetstone benchmark was supposed to measure numerical performance, our results showed that the numerical calculations took up little of the time.
Sadly, our "mini Cray" never saw the light of day. The mid-80s were a tough time to stand out in that arena as there were so many people trying to do the same thing.
It is quite common for Aussies to also be called "ozzies".
Ah, yes. But Clovis is not the Arctic North, is it?
Lastly, when paying, use PayPal since they cover your ass if/when a seller doesn't come through. It has happened to me before twice in like 7 years and PayPal has helped me out and refunded my money both times.
I would have to disagree with that. My mileage did vary.
A couple of years ago I used Paypal to buy a product that was never shipped. The vendor ignored my complaint, and Paypal equally ignored my complaint. And I mean IGNORED.
Really, really not worth a read or a reply.