Slashdot Mirror


NSA Says They Have VPNs In a 'Vulcan Death Grip'

An anonymous reader sends this quote from Ars Technica: The National Security Agency's Office of Target Pursuit (OTP) maintains a team of engineers dedicated to cracking the encrypted traffic of virtual private networks (VPNs) and has developed tools that could potentially uncloak the traffic in the majority of VPNs used to secure traffic passing over the Internet today, according to documents published this week by the German news magazine Der Speigel. A slide deck from a presentation by a member of OTP's VPN Exploitation Team, dated September 13, 2010, details the process the NSA used at that time to attack VPNs—including tools with names drawn from Star Trek and other bits of popular culture.

234 comments

  1. What IP address ranges are in the US? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I plan to block all of them. So yeah, this might be one of my last posts here.

    1. Re: What IP address ranges are in the US? by TimMD909 · · Score: 2

      I'm pretty sure the NSA has technology to use foreign IPs. Just block all traffic by slicing all cables.

    2. Re: What IP address ranges are in the US? by bryanp · · Score: 1

      Right. Because the NSA doesn't have access to IP addresses outside the US. Good luck there chief.

      --
      "An unarmed man can only flee from evil, and evil is not overcome by fleeing from it." Col. Jeff Cooper
    3. Re: What IP address ranges are in the US? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or maybe I'll just cut the cables in to the US.

    4. Re: What IP address ranges are in the US? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      doesn't it seem likely that the NSA doesn't need an IP address at all to read
      or inject traffic into a VPN?

    5. Re: What IP address ranges are in the US? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thanks private.

    6. Re:What IP address ranges are in the US? by Midnight_Falcon · · Score: 2

      Good luck with that. You can block all IPs assigned to ARIN in the US, but thanks to IP address shortages, you'll find many of those sites with ARIN-allocated IPs are actually located geographically in Europe...and some APNIC IPs are located in the US...etc etc

    7. Re:What IP address ranges are in the US? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's about time someone takes down IPv4 for good. It's really become useless. IP overall seems pretty bad. I wonder if it would be possible to design a new protocol that is backwards compatible with IP (works on existing hardware) but is better... Like, more anonymity, for example.

    8. Re: What IP address ranges are in the US? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And they used to laugh at my satellite connection... now I will have the last laugh!

    9. Re: What IP address ranges are in the US? by dpilot · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Plus don't forget, the NSA simply must be the only agency in the world trying to do this sort of thing. I'm sure that no other nation has any interest whatsoever in gathering this type or depth of information, for any reason at all.

      --
      The living have better things to do than to continue hating the dead.
    10. Re: What IP address ranges are in the US? by bragr · · Score: 4, Informative

      That is harder than you'd think. A surprising amount of data ends up going through the US. A lot of the EU-Asia traffic ends up going through the US as the indian ocean routes are relatively slow, and AFAIK Russia hasn't built any extensive cross continent fiber networks.

    11. Re:What IP address ranges are in the US? by gatkinso · · Score: 4, Informative

      My guess is that you overlooked the "USA, AUS, CAN, GBR, NZL" at the top of the slides.

      --
      I am very small, utmostly microscopic.
    12. Re:What IP address ranges are in the US? by davydagger · · Score: 1
      won't help you,

      1. the CIA covertly taps cables all over the world.
      2. Even if they didn't, there are the other four of the "five eyes", the brits, canucks, ozzies, and kiwis.
      3. Even if that weren't true, you'd have to avoid all routes that pass through the USA/5 eyes, other countries with agreements.

    13. Re: What IP address ranges are in the US? by Richard_at_work · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Does any other nation have an intelligence budget that even approaches that of the U.S.?

    14. Re: What IP address ranges are in the US? by itsenrique · · Score: 5, Funny

      With those ping times, you sure won't have the first laugh.

    15. Re:What IP address ranges are in the US? by ChunderDownunder · · Score: 1

      ozzies

      Aussies.

      cheers, cobber.

    16. Re: What IP address ranges are in the US? by jalet · · Score: 1

      Does any other nation have an intelligence budget that even approaches that of the U.S.?

      While the USA uses "intelligence budget" some other nations may only use "intelligence" alone...

      --
      Votez ecolo : Chiez dans l'urne !
    17. Re:What IP address ranges are in the US? by ChunderDownunder · · Score: 1

      No, it isn't.

      Trust me, no one here spells it with an Oh-Zed.

    18. Re: What IP address ranges are in the US? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      don't know where here is for you, but I believe it not unusual in US. Not so usual in NZ, where I live.

    19. Re:What IP address ranges are in the US? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For the unofficial record, I'm putting in that I've seen it with an "oz-" before, but more often as "au-". USian.

      (okay, let's be honest. it was in youtube comments. and you know the sorts of things you find in youtube comments...)

    20. Re: What IP address ranges are in the US? by Luckyo · · Score: 1

      And you would be correct, for reasons of simple mathematics. No other country has the capability or budget even if they wanted to do it.

    21. Re: What IP address ranges are in the US? by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      Here is Australia. That our neighbours in the US have a more colourful sense of spelling is no surprise to us at all.

    22. Re:What IP address ranges are in the US? by Goetterdaemmerung · · Score: 1

      Trust me, no one here spells it with an Oh-Zed.

      You've never heard it referred to as Oz?

      I have heard those 2 letters used in conjunction as reference to Australia many, many times during my travels there.

      Now the term "ozzies" is somewhat new that I haven't heard before. Could be a recent development.

    23. Re:What IP address ranges are in the US? by ChunderDownunder · · Score: 1

      If you're making a parallel with the wizard then maybe but one would normally abbreviate to 'Aus'

    24. Re: What IP address ranges are in the US? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Of course they would. Unless you'd like to actually ask a question instead of just stating your uncertainty in the form of a rhetorical question, then that is the only answer.

    25. Re:What IP address ranges are in the US? by dbIII · · Score: 1

      You've never heard it referred to as Oz?

      Aussie is not derived from that. Ozzies is like calling Americans Yankiis, sounds right but nobody does it unless they are guessing at spelling. The "oz" thing came later, probably not until well after the movie.

    26. Re: What IP address ranges are in the US? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Even mesh is faster than satellite. Like shouting to your neighbor inside your house versus shouting to someone on the other side of the planet and expecting them to hear you.

    27. Re:What IP address ranges are in the US? by nonicknameavailable · · Score: 1

      You'll have to block Sweden

      --
      Mendacem Memorem Esse Oportet
    28. Re: What IP address ranges are in the US? by sound+vision · · Score: 4, Interesting

      You don't think there's still the old-school hacker way to break into systems, by hacking, not buying backdoors from corporations? I'd wager that a team of no more than 5 or 10 top-notch hackers could pull off a Stuxnet- or Sony-style attack. And it may only take the cost-equivalent of 50 soldiers-with-tanks-and-support-column to do it. Normal soldiers are actually really expensive when you think of all the supplies and equipment they need in addition to just the pay and benefits. To house and feed a literal army of men for years at a time probably costs much more than putting up a roomful of hackers. Have you ever heard of the term "asymmetric warfare"? Many countries are missing entire branches of military like navy and air force and their associated expenditures. Think of the R&D funding for that alone going to hackers - you could have a hacker army. All you need is the right recruiting program, which is probably easier to put together than the US military budget. I predict we will see many more high-profile breaches before people start taking security more seriously.

    29. Re: What IP address ranges are in the US? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Irrelevant whataboutism. You don't get a free pass to steal from your neighbour just because he steals from someone else.

    30. Re: What IP address ranges are in the US? by dpilot · · Score: 1

      Not irrelevant. The parent poster was concerned about protecting his system, then proceeded to discuss protecting from the US without considering other threats.

      --
      The living have better things to do than to continue hating the dead.
    31. Re: What IP address ranges are in the US? by Luckyo · · Score: 1

      But that has nothing to do with capabilities we're talking about. You're throwing out an obvious red herring here to deflect attention from the subject. We're talking about wholesale dragnet style intelligence gathering. Not targeted strikes. That's why reference was "NSA" and not "CIA".

    32. Re:What IP address ranges are in the US? by unixisc · · Score: 1

      IPv6 is fine there. If an ISP shares a single subnet b/w all its users, other than the /64 that it gives them, anonymity is achieved.

    33. Re: What IP address ranges are in the US? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > AFAIK Russia hasn't built any extensive cross continent fiber networks.

      That surprises me somewhat, as I would think it would give them a good opportunity to spy.

    34. Re: What IP address ranges are in the US? by Pieroxy · · Score: 1

      When they gather every data across all VPNs, they will still be able to analyse a tiny fraction of it all. What they want is the capability to decrypt anything, but then they'll only listen to what is on the topic of the day, because too much data is too much. So a targeted attack might be as good in many scenarios.

    35. Re: What IP address ranges are in the US? by physicsphairy · · Score: 1

      The problem with a hacker army is hackers don't hold up very well to carpet bombing. If you're a country with nuclear capabilities, sure, go ahead and have a poke at your opponents under the assumption they won't escalate. But otherwise I wouldn't recommend conducting computer assaults on anyone as a nation if you can't back it up with physical firepower.

    36. Re:What IP address ranges are in the US? by Goetterdaemmerung · · Score: 1

      If you're making a parallel with the wizard then maybe but one would normally abbreviate to 'Aus'

      Exactly. "Land of Oz" is the slang reference that I first heard when I was visiting. At the time I was traveling with backpackers (including locals, not just foreigners), so maybe it was just a humorous joke and in less common use than I thought. I'm sure no official document would spell it that way.

      Thanks for the insight!

    37. Re: What IP address ranges are in the US? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "An unarmed man can only flee from evil, and evil is not overcome by fleeing from it." Col. Jeff Cooper And to someone with a hammer every problem is a nail...

    38. Re: What IP address ranges are in the US? by Luckyo · · Score: 1

      Which is not NSA's area of expertise but CIA's. As a result, we are clearly talking about completely different capabilities.

    39. Re:What IP address ranges are in the US? by doccus · · Score: 1

      Wouldn't there be some way to completely encrypt communications with a modified Bit coin code?

    40. Re: What IP address ranges are in the US? by mgcarley · · Score: 1

      That used to be the case, but it also depends *where* in Asia.

      From HK or Tokyo to Western Europe, sure, because of lit capacity and paths of least-resistance, but since about 2010 or 2011, there has been a lot more capacity installed and lit up between Mumbai and Europe (England/France/Italy via the Middle East, depending on the cable system) than there is between Chennai and the US via Singapore/HK/Tokyo.

      Russia has fairly extensive fiber, but as I understand it, not much diversity. I would hypothesize that it's used mostly by domestic ISPs and AFAIK quite expensive to use because *I believe* they charge in bit-kilometres in a similar way to most sub-sea cables** AND because of the risks (perceived or real) of routing through Russia**. It's also possible that their domestic network might not be suitable for carrying traffic of International operators because the figures I've as far as operational speeds go seem to be a bit slow.**

      **These are all theories on my part, don't take them as accurate unless, by chance, they are.

      --
      Founder & COO, Hayai India (hayai.in) / USA (hayaibroadband.com) // t: @mgcarley
    41. Re: What IP address ranges are in the US? by ScrewMaster · · Score: 1

      I suspect that China does. They just haven't had a Snowden happen to them.

      --
      The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
    42. Re: What IP address ranges are in the US? by Luckyo · · Score: 1

      You would have to be mathematically inept to even suspect such a thing.

      They would want to have such a system yes. They would not be ABLE to have it, because mathematics of reality dictate the capability, not wishful thinking.

    43. Re: What IP address ranges are in the US? by hughankers · · Score: 1

      "An unarmed man can only flee from evil, and evil is not overcome by fleeing from it." Col. Jeff Cooper And to someone with a hammer every problem is a nail...

      Col Jeff Cooper seems to be under the impression that evil is a tangible enemy that can be fought with physical weapons.
      To my mind the only real evil is the fact that we're all so scared of our fellow human beings' different ways of life that we'd rather shoot them dead than have our own 'perfect' culture contaminated by their strange foreign outlook.

    44. Re: What IP address ranges are in the US? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, they really don't need public IPs assigned to such systems. If they are doing this via fiber taps then it's a perfect MITM attack. If they just want to gather the information for decryption & review they wouldn't need to insert any data & therefore no chance of being caught.

    45. Re: What IP address ranges are in the US? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't believe anyone claimed "Oz" was the original nickname for Australia. It is obviously much more recent. Though, it does go back to at least the .com boom days in the US (mid-late 90s).

    46. Re: What IP address ranges are in the US? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You should. The Internet would be better off without you.

    47. Re: What IP address ranges are in the US? by fuzzy2k · · Score: 1

      Actually, given the lag time, isn't it almost guaranteed that they *will* have the last laugh? Not in a good way, but technically, yeah, long after others have seen it and laughed.

      --
      --- Say something clever. Pretend it was me. Thanks.
    48. Re: What IP address ranges are in the US? by uninformedLuddite · · Score: 1

      It's always operating as a deficit

      --
      The new right fascists are bilingual. They speak English and Bullshit.
    49. Re: What IP address ranges are in the US? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't understand what that will do for you but block a lot of lame shopping sites and some real independent news sites. I'm guessing you think this will block the NSA? You think they are only using US ISP addresses? Throwing the wrong baby out with the bathwater IMO.

  2. Re:Mother shot by 2-year child by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

    Is her IP address free now?

  3. 4 years ago? by Media+Archivist · · Score: 1

    Have VPNs not improved over the past 4 years? I would think just the efforts to get around the Chinese GFW ought to have mitigated whatever the NSA could do four years ago.

    1. Re:4 years ago? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, but the NSA was using Star Trek names.

    2. Re:4 years ago? by khasim · · Score: 5, Interesting

      It's not so much the VPN technology as it is the failure to correctly implement and secure it.

      TFA leaves the real content until the end of the article:

      The data is then replayed from the repositories through a set of attack scripts, which use sets of preshared keys (PSKs) harvested from sources such as exploited routers and stored in a key database ...

      So if the NSA wants to "crack" your VPN session they first record it (we know how they do that) then they try to brute force that recording using what is, essentially, a dictionary attack.

      TFA seems more entranced by the cutesy names than by the technology.

    3. Re:4 years ago? by NatasRevol · · Score: 1

      Have VPNs not improved over the past 4 years?

      Have the NSAs abilities not improved over the past 4 years?

      --
      There are two types of people in the world: Those who crave closure
    4. Re:4 years ago? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ipsec was/is best hope. however there were ike exploits back then too.
      SSL was doomed from start thats probably why is was pushed so hard by cisco and others.

    5. Re:4 years ago? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      TFA seems more entranced by the cutesy names than by the technology.

      well, that is what the summary (TFS?) said....that the names of projects are from pop movies. It didn't say there was anything new or otherwise interesting really.

    6. Re:4 years ago? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, but the NSA was using Star Trek names.

      And the 'Vulcan Death Grip'

    7. Re:4 years ago? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Depends on the type of VPN tech. Running PPP over SSH may not be as efficient due to varying MTU sizes, and running UDP over TCP, etc... but it is quite simple and secure, and if one floods a SSH connection, worst case, it drops and re-forms (and if one uses RSA authentication, no passwords are needed.)

      I'm sure the Chinese can also break into VPNs as well, elsewise they just wouldn't allow any unencrypted connections out of the mainland.

    8. Re:4 years ago? by phantomfive · · Score: 1

      TFA seems more entranced by the cutesy names than by the technology.

      Welcome to the brave new world of journalism.

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    9. Re:4 years ago? by ChunderDownunder · · Score: 2

      I thought that was a reference to The Big Bang Theory.

      You know, the show set in the Californian neighbourhood in which unemployed actors such as Levar Burton, Wil Wheaton and Brent Spiner dwell.

    10. Re:4 years ago? by mallyn · · Score: 1

      Did they get permission from Sony? I thought those names are copyright/trademark?

      --
      Most Respectfully Yours Mark Allyn Bellingham, Washington
    11. Re:4 years ago? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      then they try to brute force that recording using what is, essentially, a dictionary attack.

      And given that far too many dopes are *still* running MSCHAPv2 on PPTP, nevermind in 2010 - this seems entirely within the realm of _known_ weaknesses.

      If they have a break for TLS w/ a PFS cypher and OpenVPN, then we have a news story.

    12. Re:4 years ago? by currently_awake · · Score: 1

      A better question is "hasen't the NSA improved their VPN monitoring ability in four years?".

    13. Re:4 years ago? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      IP laws does not apply for national security purposes (at least according to WIPO agreements). For instance, the military is allowed to use whatever patents with impunity. Or GPL software without giving out the source.

    14. Re:4 years ago? by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      That's always been a known "vulnerability" of real-time VPN. A 4069 bit encryption would be "safer" but the delays/processing power would decrease usability. 256 bit is "good enough" for 99.9%. For more than that, you can have stronger encryption.

      One of the ideas behind the "weak" VPN is that decrpyting it 2 years later will not help anyone. The US government is good at forensics, but worthless for prediction.

  4. whatever NSA wants by turkeydance · · Score: 1

    NSA gets...popular culture take on "Damn Yankees".

  5. *sigh* by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    At some point, we will all just disconnect and call it a day.. Then what will they do?

    1. Re:*sigh* by Irate+Engineer · · Score: 2

      Win.

      --

      Left MS Windows for Linux Mint and never looked back!

      Vote for Bernie in 2016!

    2. Re:*sigh* by fustakrakich · · Score: 1

      Then what will they do?

      What they always have been doing, drinking Dr. Pepper and playing minesweeper...

      --
      “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
    3. Re:*sigh* by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They dont win if lose their easy access to our data.

    4. Re:*sigh* by BarbaraHudson · · Score: 1
      The real question is what will the general population, who thinks that "Computer" == "Internet" do.

      First, the CIA says UFOs are theirs. Next the NSA. Bunch of buzz-kills. Was this someone making good on some sort of New Years resolution?

      --
      "Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
    5. Re:*sigh* by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They dont win if lose their easy access to our data.

      It's not as though reverting to snail mail is less prone to government eavesdropping and "recording to later playback." Do we have a modern-day equivalent to the Code Talkers?

    6. Re:*sigh* by The+Grim+Reefer · · Score: 1

      At some point, we will all just disconnect and call it a day.. Then what will they do?

      Send an MQ-9 Reaper to "deliver" a Hellfire missile to your residence. Obviously if you are offline you have something to hide. And if you have something to hide, you must be a terrorist.

  6. Re:Mother shot by 2-year child by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

    He was mad because his VPN was compromised.

  7. A little help here. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why are we always on the defense about this kind of thing? I wish some people with the proper skills to out flank the digital rape happening would flip the script on these turkeys.

    1. Re:A little help here. by mSparks43 · · Score: 2

      I'd say its because they've been influencing it at the school level CS classes.

      "Its too hard" - "its too easy to make mistakes"
      -"let those who know what they are doing handle it"
      ubiquitous.

    2. Re:A little help here. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      This....

      I'm told not to implement (or try) my own crypto so I instead use a pre-cracked version that I'm told is secure.

      Even if my crypto isn't as good, a real human likely has to try to crack it and think some thoughts about it's design.

      I'd take that over automated collection any day. Learn to roll your own crypto.

    3. Re:A little help here. by mSparks43 · · Score: 1

      I like truecrypts approach of layering more than one encryption pipeline. (e.g. AES+twofish)

      In fact I first realized all this is what they were doing when I saw prominent cryptologists (I forget who) recommending against this as "less secure".

    4. Re: A little help here. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      suck it nsa schill

    5. Re:A little help here. by AHuxley · · Score: 1

      For that a person would need a real computer service at both ends of a network with good encryption at both ends and along the network.
      So the home computer would have to encrypt that connection from some distant country to the USA.
      The computer in the USA would have to then exit to the internet use and pass the network back to some distant country and the home computer.
      That service and networking product would have to be registered in the USA and that would allow for ip ranges to be tracked as exits from a global VPN ending in the USA.
      The question of how to find that computer user in some distant country who trusted the US VPN seems to be a not very hard problem even with great crypto at both ends.
      Is the crypto tame? Would the US VPN have some responsibility to log and track all ip requests in the clear? A never ending legal letter covering all international networking use? A version of the Communications Assistance for Law Enforcement Act (CALEA) for all US VPN users and services?
      VPN providers should be able to understand their own internal networks and hardware?
      The "specific repository" would hint at some long term international standard been junk.
      So to help with this a VPN would really need some new skills and really have to reinvent every connection as requested per session and then reset.
      Back to needing powerful bespoke connections that are not part of some tame junk international standard on a cheap shared server.
      The user has to trust that service and all the networking and staff.
      Number stations and one time pads do seem the more interesting solution.

      --
      Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
    6. Re:A little help here. by g0bshiTe · · Score: 1

      Snowden did and look where it got him.

      Instead of people waking up and lobbying their CongressCritters to put an end to it even threatening to remove them from office for inaction, oh look Honey Boo Boo.

      --
      I am Bennett Haselton! I am Bennett Haselton!
  8. Re:Mother shot by 2-year child by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It sounds like that child had his mother's gun in a Vulcan Death Grip.

  9. It's a ruse by Ixtl · · Score: 1

    We all know there's no such thing as the Vulcan Death Grip.

  10. OK but the "Death Grip" was a fiction - a bluff by jpellino · · Score: 1

    to get a "dead" Kirk past the baddies. Now, if they had them in a Vulcan nerve pinch, I'd worry.

    --
    "Win treats sysadmins better than users. Mac treats users better than sysadmins. Linux treats everyone like sysadmins."
    1. Re:OK but the "Death Grip" was a fiction - a bluff by zlives · · Score: 1

      in this case it is a ruse to justify funding.

    2. Re:OK but the "Death Grip" was a fiction - a bluff by SemperUbi · · Score: 1

      And if the NSA were going through Pon Farr, I'd stay the hell away.

  11. Mother shot by 2-year child by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    who cares? it's not a darwin award because she had already reproduced, it's not a tragedy because it's her own damn fault.

  12. Sigh. by ledow · · Score: 5, Insightful

    So if they have the PSK, then they can decrypt your VPN connection?

    Yeah, not surprising.

    Nowhere does it say they actually have effective techniques for extracting the PSK from, say, a Diffie-Hellman exchange. Because.... well... pretty much, nobody can.

    But, sure, if you plug in your VPN PSK into a router that's then compromised, your PSK is then public knowledge. Hell, in most places it's listed in your Cisco CLI and extractable if you have access to it (http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/support/docs/security/pix-500-series-security-appliances/82076-preshared-key-recover.html).

    Isn't this why we have several things, not least SSL VPN with proper keychains, certificate revocation, passphrase-protected keys, etc.?

    You can try to scaremonger all you like (this is, what? The fourth of fifth article this month with scaremongering like this about Tor, SSL, etc.?). Fact is nobody has demonstrated, or even pointed to suspicious circumstances that may hint, that the NSA or anyone else are doing anything different to the bad guys out there - finding out that compromising the devices is generally easier than decrypting proper TLS security. And nobody's been seen to actually have a shred of evidence that they can decrypt TLS by any way other than being handed the keys.

    All this does is tell me the exact OPPOSITE of what the little guy (and presumably anyone reading this article, shame on you Slashdot) would take home. The NSA aren't able to do anything more than I thought they could. That the encryption is serving it's purpose to the point that it's easier to compromise the routers en-masse than it is to break the encryption.

    All this does is say to me "Keep doing what you're doing". Use proper PKE with decent size keys and secure them as much as humanly possible.

    All I've thought about these kinds of articles for the past year is "What are you trying to scare me onto?" Truecrypt, SSL, PFS etc. It all points towards a certain set of algorithms which are hailed as the "solution" to all these problems - Elliptic Curve. Strangely, one of the "official" curved was designed in co-operation with these people and they won't provide justification for it, and their track-record in this area is quite well-known. These are the people who paid RSA to weaken their encryption, the people who didn't want us to be able to have large-bit encryption available in any case, and who wanted us to have backdoored chips protecting our devices.

    PKE is doing it's job at the moment. I'd hate to think that we all jump-ship to the thing that's ACTUALLY broken, in our haste to secure things against this kind of propaganda.

    1. Re:Sigh. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thanks - I'm glad someone read the article.

    2. Re:Sigh. by phantomfive · · Score: 1

      On the other hand, it's kind of reassuring that all the attacks revealed about the NSA so far are relatively mundane. They haven't found a simple way to factor large numbers, for example.

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    3. Re:Sigh. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They haven't found a simple way to factor large numbers

      That they told Snowden about.

      Consider the "OMG we can't crack Tor sob sob sob" document Snowden published, which was from something like 2006, since then they got PRISM which tracks every connection (its "just" "metadata") and therefore knows the exact path your communication took from your computer through the onion and out the other end where they picked up your message. "But it's a hidden service!" you cry? So? They can connect to tormail.onion too and can see the packets going there and they know exactly whose server to take down. Bonus points for it hosting a couple of kiddie porn sites too, acceptable collateral damage to take down the real target.

    4. Re:Sigh. by kylemonger · · Score: 1

      And if they knew how to factor large integers efficiently they certainly would not tell us, since we'd all immediately move to ciphers unrelated to factoring integers. The NSA has no reason to tell us how great their cracking tools are. So if they are bragging, it's because they are trying to scare us off something that works and onto something that doesn't.

    5. Re:Sigh. by phantomfive · · Score: 1

      This is not a document the NSA chose to release.

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    6. Re:Sigh. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So, your public key crypto is still secure. Who Cares? You think you use an OS that can't easily be cracked by a myriad of pre-packaged exploit vectors purchasable today on the black market (where the NSA buys them, along with anyone else interested)? You don't.

      Once you've been targeted by The Ferret Cannon, and your garaunteed vulnerable systems exploited by targeted malware, it's game over man.

    7. Re:Sigh. by ledow · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Your choice of OS, if you have something worth encrypting and hiding, is the least of your worries.

      If you have any brains at all, all key generation is done offline on a clean machine and then that machine destroyed. Only a specific, purpose-built target on YOU would stop that working as intended without informing the NSA, and then they may as well just listen in to the room anyway.

      What you are falling into is the "movie hackers" fallacy - "Gosh, everything hackable therefore everything is hacked all the time". If you have a clean, from-disk OS, even, and keep it off the net, and sign your messages with your pre-generated private key on a device that goes NOWHERE and only gets turned on when you need to use it - fuck 'em. Quite what power do you think they have over that?

      The problem with modern day stuff is ALL Internet-access-based. Hell, most people think a computer isn't a computer unless it's on the Internet nowadays.

      Don't get me wrong, if you're targeted by the NSA, I'm sure they can get to you somehow. But I can assure you they were targeting Bin Laden and he survived, what, a decade with the whole world looking for him? He was found to be couriering USB keys down to the local cybercafe.

      Targeted malware only works if you're stupid enough to expose the machine to the net, or run programs that aren't verifying content. Fuck trying to "infect" someone who only reads their mail via "mutt", for example. It's all Hollywood tripe.

      If there's a terrorist with a brain out there, and they are trying to avoid the NSA's glare, I'd be quite annoyed at their stupidity if they aren't using read-only boot media, a bunch of random devices bought in shops, PKE, and programs that aren't mainstream enough to have exploits written for them.

      Fuck, even I know how to encrypt mail offline and have read my mail accounts via telnet in the past.

      If you're targeted, malware is the fucking least of your worries, and easily countered by not allowing your PC to come into contact with it. Even that stuff about some malware making computers "talk" over audio channels to cross air-gaps only works when computers are infected in the first place.

      We even have double-compilation-verification built operating systems, and you can boot some old shit off a floppy image from pre-Windows days if you're really paranoid.

      The problem is not that - it's not encrypting, generating, or securing your message. It's how do you get your message to the wider net from there, and that identifies your location quite quickly. However, as pointed out above, you can sit in the same location for ten years with a willing stooge to courier to nearby cybercafes and NEVER get caught that way.

      It lacks in imagination to think that the NSA, or indeed any intelligence agency, is really as good as you think they are. I'm a massive fan of GCHQ history, for instance, and I quite believe that today's GCHQ is a shadow of it's former self forced to resort to asking Facebook for copies of its data. Given that they invented this type of stuff to prevent EXACTLY what they are trying to do now, it's hilarious that it's backfired to the point where they are having to convince you they really can listen to everything, everywhere, always.

      If they could do that, you would never hear of it. Because, you see, they'd know about all the leaks and be able to stop them in their tracks - legally or illegally.

    8. Re:Sigh. by Trane+Francks · · Score: 1

      Really. Well. Stated! *wild applause*

      --
      ...a FreeDOS contributor: http://www.freedos.org/
    9. Re:Sigh. by gweihir · · Score: 1

      I completely agree. Sure, some implementations are flawed, but they can be fixed. All that fear-mongering and fact-distorting just serves to drive people to less secure alternatives. That is by design and I expect that quite a few people posting in this thread here (and in other places) on this subject are actually paid to create a certain atmosphere of fear and uncertainty about tools that are very likely secure or can only be broken by targeted, high-effort attacks.

      As to Elliptic Curve Crypto (ECC): Stay away from that like the plague. Maybe, just maybe the DJB curves are secure, but anything the NSA may have gotten its hands on is sure to be compromised, and, by design, you cannot prove that a curve is secure unless you prove it was generated in a way that does not allow a compromise. There is also a highly suspicious trend by VPN vendors to recommend using ECC. That does not make sense at all, unless driven by the NSA. The thing is that ECC is not needed at all. Normal asymmetric crypto is by far fast enough, unless you go to very slow processors, like you have on chip-cards.

      --
      Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
    10. Re:Sigh. by gweihir · · Score: 1

      An NSA employee once told me "If we could do what people think we can do, the world would look differently". I still find that very convincing and plausible. All what the NSA does is the same that ordinary IT criminals can do, just scaled up. Regarding the respective groups at the NSA as ordinary IT criminals is in fact a rather accurate model, as in the end, they are just after money and power. All this "fighting XYZ" propaganda is just the usual lies.

      --
      Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
    11. Re:Sigh. by currently_awake · · Score: 1

      At what Security Classification level would such information be kept? Would some random IT tech have access to that knowledge?

    12. Re:Sigh. by phantomfive · · Score: 1

      That information is probably kept on this computer

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    13. Re:Sigh. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Perhaps that NSA employee needs to read the Snowden leaks on what the NSA can actually do. Because we're discussing the unpleasant reality here.

    14. Re:Sigh. by catmistake · · Score: 1

      Regarding the respective groups at the NSA as ordinary IT criminals is in fact a rather accurate model, as in the end, they are just after money and power.

      Do you really believe any member of this particular NSA team is really an anarchist and has the lifegoal of robber-baron?

    15. Re:Sigh. by dbIII · · Score: 1

      Nowhere does it say they actually have effective techniques for extracting the PSK from, say, a Diffie-Hellman exchange. Because.... well... pretty much, nobody can.

      They don't need to. Compromising Cisco etc plus a pile of Telcos does the job. Ever wondered about those stupid "SSL accelerator" boxes that some places have been fooled into buying? Pretty fucking obvious way in there since people are granting access to their VPNs, bank accounts etc to the admins of those proxy boxes and most likely the vendors plus agencies that have been granted access. Personally I think such devices make zero sense other than as data harvesting tools and go against the entire point of SSL.
      Then there's the commercial VPN services, just one visit from somebody mentioning the PAT RIOT act (which has zero to do with patriotism - what a weasel naming trick) and that toy soldier can get it all.

    16. Re:Sigh. by dbIII · · Score: 1

      Probably. Truth seems to be far more incompetent than fiction.
      If I was a foreign spy I'd use vectors like that Star Trek set designer they let into the place, or showgirls, or whoever else those egotistical horse judges running the place let inside. Put a modern equivalent of the theremin bug into artwork just like the original theremin bug was put into a carved " Great Seal of the United States" (how's that for nasty style). Pander to their egos and suddenly competence has left the building. Remember that the most sensitive stuff is known by people who are there only because they were drinking buddies with the right person. The random IT guy who looks after their outlook folders on any given day probably has access to such secrets no matter what the procedure is supposed to be.

    17. Re:Sigh. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is not a document the NSA chose to release.

      But have you thought that they may have had the intention of releasing this in response to the Snowden leaks as a form of propaganda for example? Snowden probably collected everything regardless of propaganda vs top secret info.

    18. Re:Sigh. by CreatureComfort · · Score: 1

      No, silly! They are the minions.

      --
      "Unheard of means only it's undreamed of yet,
      Impossible means not yet done." ~~ Julia Ecklar
    19. Re:Sigh. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Naive. So so naive. Billions of dollar, and they are just like ordinary IT criminals. Power of law, power of black ops, and they are ordinary.

      No sir. You are wrong. They may be on par with Chinese and Russians, but they far outpace ordinary IT criminals.

    20. Re:Sigh. by phantomfive · · Score: 1

      Most likely Snowden is a secret agent of the US and Putin, right?

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    21. Re:Sigh. by gweihir · · Score: 1

      You forget that there are far more IT criminals than there are NSA employees....
      This thing scales in several dimensions.

      --
      Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
    22. Re:Sigh. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They never got Bin Laden. He died non-violently from kidney failure in December 2001.

    23. Re:Sigh. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      All I read was "I know a lot of security buzzwords, but then I used telnet to POP my email."

    24. Re:Sigh. by RoLi · · Score: 1

      Exactly.

      Non-technical journalists who have no idea write these scare-articles because they have to turn everything into some alarmist nonsense.

    25. Re:Sigh. by Savage-Rabbit · · Score: 1

      One small point, it you really do all of this you will stick out like a sore thumb because you will be relatively easy to find in a sea of unencrypted data. Police have actually caught offnders like that. Better yet, the NSA, unlike the cops has compromised most VPN and SHTTP service providers so you will be one of a rather small number of people whose signals traffic they can't decrypt which narrows things down even more. You can usen couriers but you had better be damn smart about how and whewe from they do their transmitting because pattern analysis can still narrow down your location. If one of them uses the same internet cafe too often the next thing you know a van is permanantly parked outside your house to be followed by Virginia farmboys in ninja commando outfits smashing through your doors and windows.

      --
      Only to idiots, are orders laws.
      -- Henning von Tresckow
  13. Aka, backdoors by MouseR · · Score: 1

    Breaking into VPN isn't that easy.

    1. Re:Aka, backdoors by arbiter1 · · Score: 1

      The months or years of work its taking to do so, takes only handful of days for a vpn to change overto an encryption that hasn't been cracked yet.

    2. Re:Aka, backdoors by poundtag · · Score: 1

      The months or years of work its taking to do so, takes only handful of days for a vpn to change overto an encryption that hasn't been cracked yet.

      Ah yes; but who said that it hasn't been cracked yet? The NSA.

  14. Good news by Charliemopps · · Score: 4, Interesting

    This is actually good news. The clearly state that "Ubiquitous Encryption" is a threat to the NSA. They are currently assuming that encrypted traffic is something they should target so if everything's encrypted... viola.

    So go out, encrypt everything you can. I'm looking directly at you SlashDot. Fix your 10yrs out of date website for christs sake. You want me to start using "Beta"? Secure it!

    1. Re:Good news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why? You're still using the unencrypted site anyway.

    2. Re:Good news by wbr1 · · Score: 4, Insightful
      To what end should slashdot secure itself? Are you storing confidential info here? It is a public forum. Anyone, including an NSA agent can browse all your postings regardless of any encryption used between you and this site.

      There would need to be a compelling business/financial reason for any site to do so. Helping others hide their traffic is not all that compelling from a beancounters point of view.

      --
      Silence is a state of mime.
    3. Re:Good news by whoever57 · · Score: 1

      They are currently assuming that encrypted traffic is something they should target so if everything's encrypted... viola.

      So.... they can play them like a violin? Or did you mean "voila"?

      --
      The real "Libtards" are the Libertarians!
    4. Re:Good news by Charliemopps · · Score: 3, Insightful

      To what end should slashdot secure itself?

      To keep me as a viewer.

      Are you storing confidential info here?

      Yes. Everything I do is confidential until I explicitly declare it's not. This text is displayed publicly for all to see. But how it got here, from where I'm logging in and who I am in real life is none of your business until I say I'm ok with that.

      It is a public forum. Anyone, including an NSA agent can browse all your postings regardless of any encryption used between you and this site.

      But linking them to me is an entirely different thing. Sure, anonymity doesn't gain me a lot currently. But we've no idea what the next US administration is going to look like do we? And what of my friends in China? I'd like to hear their thoughts on this as well. Oh... they can't even remotely post here... I guess Slashdot doesn't need 1/3rd of the worlds audience... oh well.

      There would need to be a compelling business/financial reason for any site to do so. Helping others hide their traffic is not all that compelling from a beancounters point of view.

      being a tech site, and the ever increasing consumer demand for secure communications, I think the rather trivial effort it would take to implement HTTPS would forever mar this "Tech" website as being ridiculously out of date. It doesn't really matter if you ever use the intermittent wipers in your car... it makes a new car look pretty stupid not to have them either way.

    5. Re:Good news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Needle in a mountain of nails theory.

    6. Re:Good news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      To what end should slashdot secure itself? Are you storing confidential info here? It is a public forum. Anyone, including an NSA agent can browse all your postings regardless of any encryption used between you and this site.

      I visit slashdot.org in my browser, but instead I get kiddie porn (or other government-objectionable material, think China), or malware (but I wasn't expecting an executable), or a zero-day exploit for my client (but I should make sure not to have any), just because slashdot isn't using TLS. I give /. a password, maybe some users have password reuse problems. Maybe I visit /. but the MitM injects a fake story claiming that the president has been shot. Maybe even more things I haven't thought of.

      There would need to be a compelling business/financial reason for any site to do so. Helping others hide their traffic is not all that compelling from a beancounters point of view.

      We need to change the default to secure. A lack of imagination to identify the risks is not a good enough excuse to avoid encryption.

    7. Re:Good news by trollboy · · Score: 1

      I'll often type "viola" as I'm a old "Married... with children" fan and that's how Kelly Bundy said it. I'm also a fan of TrailerPark Boys Rickyisms. As such, especially if I'm being sarcastic about something, I can make a small joke and possibly point out the idiocy of a concept. Get two birds stoned at once.

      --
      That which is not dead may eternal lie,and in strange aeons even death may die
    8. Re:Good news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      so if everything's encrypted... viola

      Cello.

    9. Re:Good news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There would need to be a compelling business/financial reason for any site to do so.

      And there is such a reason. They should do it because it appeals to the site's user base, and we want them to provide it.

      This is a technical news site for technical users. We like encryption, security, computers, electronics, gadgets, and other geeky stuff. Adding SSL support would be like adding cool racing stripes to a car. It may not be useful from your point of view, but it appeals to the site's demographics. Now, the fact that adding SSL does serve a useful purpose makes not adding it even more of a bad business decision.

      Combine that with the fact that in 2014 having always-on SSL is a prudent and normal thing to do, and the site risks losing credibility with its technical user base. This site says it's a technical news site for nerds, but doesn't demonstrate it. It talks the talk, but doesn't walk the walk. Is this site even run by technical people?

      Years ago, when Rob Malda was still running Slashdot, the site had a post where they discussed the technical infrastructure behind it. They use a load balancer in front of the web servers. Sticking an SSL certificate on that thing isn't a financial or technological challenge. It's a menial task that can probably be delegated to a junior admin. This is the cost of doing business, and they can write it off. So, what's the hold up?

      Good grief, even Facebook, a site meant to appeal to the masses and lowest common denominator, has always-on SSL and IPv6 support. Yet this ancient and once-influential tech site can't be bothered to implement either, even though its users have been asking for both of them for years . Your grandmother has a more modern, secure, and technologically sophisticated connection to Facebook to look at cat photos than we do on Slashdot when we discuss security and technological advances. WTF? For shame, Slashdot. For shame.

    10. Re:Good news by paavo512 · · Score: 1

      It is a public forum. Anyone, including an NSA agent can browse all your postings regardless of any encryption used between you and this site.

      Nobody can browse my posts if I am posting as "anonymous coward" ... except that is not quite true without a secure connection!

    11. Re:Good news by dbIII · · Score: 1

      To what end should slashdot secure itself? Are you storing confidential info here?

      Impersonation can be annoying with real world consequences depending on what the impersonator writes.

    12. Re:Good news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      FYI, "Voila" is a french word. "viola" is also a french word, it's the past simple of "violer", which mean "to rape, to violate" ...

      So each time you use "viola", you are perpetrating rape culture.

    13. Re:Good news by Just+Some+Guy · · Score: 1

      To what end should slashdot secure itself?

      Because without HTTPS, anyone who owns a router between me and their hosting site can see everything I'm reading, every comment I make as AC, every session cookie I pass over the wire, everything. More importantly, there's no good reason whatsoever not to secure it. Encryption is incredibly cheap, so Just Do It.

      --
      Dewey, what part of this looks like authorities should be involved?
    14. Re:Good news by BlackPignouf · · Score: 1

      if everything's encrypted... viola.

      Interesting. How do you plan to encrypt a big violin? :)

    15. Re:Good news by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      The NSA/GCHQ can currently see what you are looking at on the site, who you log in as, whose profiles you look at etc. Those things are not public. Presumably they are logged somewhere, but a warrant should be required to view those logs. As it is, the security services just grab everything and file it away in your dossier, and that's wrong.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    16. Re:Good news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      SSL should be available to logged in users? However it doesn't go far enough; every guest connection should be SSL'd. If you bring up the argument of SSL being CPU intensive, I'll ignore you as you're stuck in the 1990s

    17. Re:Good news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That comment about ignoring you wasn't at you directly but at anyone who dares bring that outdated argument up, because if they bring that up, they may as well remind us to park our HDD drive heads everytime we power down.

    18. Re:Good news by Lord+Apathy · · Score: 1

      To what end should slashdot secure itself?

      Because all sites should be secure. All the way from your bank to that page you tossed up on some old slackware box where to post pictures of your dog. Just as all email should be sent private key/public key now.

      Think of it like this. If only the important shit is encrypted then that data steam stands out as important on the internet. If all the shit is encrypted then nothing stands out as "decrypt me, I'm important." Its the herd principal.

      --

      Supporting World Peace Through Nuclear Pacification

    19. Re:Good news by Stewie241 · · Score: 1

      "they may as well remind us to park our HDD drive heads everytime we power down."

      Are you saying I don't have to maintain my park.sh script anymore? I wish you'd told me that before I completely rewrote it to support SSDs.

    20. Re:Good news by rHBa · · Score: 1

      Easy, with Bass64 encoding

    21. Re:Good news by wbr1 · · Score: 1

      The cat is gone from that bag. Do you think dive wouldn't just handover the keys when asked? If you want security, encrypt yourself and kep private messages private. Trusting a 3rd party to any secrets is laughable.

      --
      Silence is a state of mime.
    22. Re:Good news by strikethree · · Score: 1

      They are currently assuming that encrypted traffic is something they should target so if everything's encrypted... viola.

      Why is everyone talking about stringed instruments lately? Is it the spell-checker feature gone mad? Turn it off and viola! Everything is fixed?

      Voila my friend. Voila. :)

      --
      "Someone needs to talk to the tree of liberty about its ghoulish drinking problem." by ohnocitizen
    23. Re:Good news by strikethree · · Score: 1

      To what end should slashdot secure itself?

      To make ubiquitous interception of all traffic less feasible.

      Sure, there is nothing here other than people voicing their opinions which will likely get them put on some watch-list, but that is not what is important.

      What is important is improving the security of communication overall, not just any one specific communication.

      --
      "Someone needs to talk to the tree of liberty about its ghoulish drinking problem." by ohnocitizen
    24. Re:Good news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Honest answer: To piss the TLA's off. Throw roadblocks in their way. Clutter up the packetways with encrypted traffic so that encyrption becomes normal and unencrypted becomes abnormal. Do all kinds of stuff to make the work of the TLA's real work and not 8 seconds of typing into Facebook.

      Re: "...beancounters point of view"

      So then let's do an end-run around the beancounters. Seriously, get security by default to be the in-thing among the CEO's, written up in the airline magazines. Once you make it fashionable among the CEO set the opinions of the beancounters won't amount to a hill of beans. Tell the CEO's that they have to secure in order to be competitive. Start talking up an "encryption gap". Suggest that their biggest competitors have an advantage and that your company is falling behind. Point out that customers are starting to demand security and that sales are on the line.

  15. The secret? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Two NSA agents, one keyboard.

  16. For All Naysayers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Required post follows....

    "We must stop pedophiles and similar criminals from terrorizing our children. THINK OF THE CHILDREN."

    "We must stop terrorism and similar criminals from...."

    "We must stop...."

    The rest of this post was stopped by the NSA-FBI-CIA spyware secretly installed on this computer. YOU HAVE BEEN WARNED!!!

  17. Re:Mother shot by 2-year child by BarbaraHudson · · Score: 1

    Well, technically the definition is someone who, by their stupidity, removes themselves from the gene pool. Unless she has a twin sister, her genes are history.

    Nominees significantly improve the gene pool by eliminating themselves from the human race in an obviously stupid way. They are self-selected examples of the dangers inherent in a lack of common sense, and all human races, cultures, and socioeconomic groups are eligible to compete. Actual winners must meet the following criteria:

    Reproduction Out of the gene pool: dead or sterile.

    Excellence Astounding misapplication of judgment.

    Self-Selection Cause one's own demise.

    Maturity Capable of sound judgment.

    Veracity The event must be true.

    Nowhere does is say that they can't already have kids. Putting a loaded gun where your kid can get it is incredibly dumb, and this dummy won't continue to pass their genes along. Natural selection means that eventually, as gun-totin' mamas produce fewer offspring before dying, they will be out-competed (natural selection at work).

    So, she can take her place among the other people of Walmart

    --
    "Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
  18. Slick tools like this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1
  19. Duh use TOR!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    TOR is free and totally not dominated by government-run endpoints in the US. I mean the stories of LEOs taking down various NGO endpoints to create natural GO chokepoints on the US part of the network is way overblown. TOR is very secure and anonymous!

    1. Re:Duh use TOR!! by gweihir · · Score: 1

      Nice propaganda attempt, shill.

      --
      Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
    2. Re:Duh use TOR!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow... not sure if you're dense or simply unfunny.

    3. Re:Duh use TOR!! by gweihir · · Score: 1

      I can recognize faked irony...

      --
      Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
  20. NSA-resistant VPN's were done before... by Kishin · · Score: 1
    One of the earliest secure (at the time) systems was a VPN: the BLACKER VPN. NSA couldn't hack it. There were numerous products with this capability under the banner "crypto seal" that were evaluated in 90's, including GEMSOS. The NSA's Type 1 HAIPE is a modified IPsec that passed their rigorous Type 1 development and evaluation process. Navy researchers also finished an EAL7 IPsec VPN that got canned just before certification because there was "no market for it" per management. Further, there's been many link encryptors and mail guards (which support crypto) that made it to the top level. The result is that you *can* build secure VPN's. Private companies, NSA, and academics have all done it. You must clearly understand where the risks are, mitigate them in the design, and do the software lifecycle with a EAL6-7 type process. A rare few companies are using high assurance methods, but almost zero FOSS projects are. They use insecure languages, libraries, OS's, firmware, and hardware. Guaranteed to be hacked. Want to know what it takes to build something secure? I included some of the requirements in the conversation below:

    http://www.schneier.com/blog/a...

    Examples of better approaches and some exemplar secure products:

    https://www.schneier.com/blog/...

    1. Re:NSA-resistant VPN's were done before... by AHuxley · · Score: 1

      Re "You must clearly understand where the risks are, mitigate them in the design".
      Costs and design cannot get around cooperation needed for an ongoing investigation over a few years covering an ip range entering the USA.
      If that ip range covers the internet then a VPN would have to help and never talk.
      A few years later another request is sealed and more logs requested?
      Hardware encryption systems of the 1950-80's faced all the same questions and idealism. The NSA and GCHQ got the plain text every time on generations of standard systems sold over the decades.
      Users where as trusting as they are now. Embassy communications ended up in the hands of the press for the world to read.
      Software is no different. If staff and management wont help with weak products then the tame competition is supported. Or a front company is set up in direct competition with endless support and promotion until standards are more tame.

      --
      Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
    2. Re:NSA-resistant VPN's were done before... by Kishin · · Score: 1

      What does all that nonsense have to do with a VPN? Do you even know what they do? A VPN protects the secrecy, integrity and authenticity of communications between two points. This has been done to high assurance. Repeatedly. NSA still relies* on some of these to protect their communications from foreign nation-states. You can leverage strong end-to-end VPN tech to protect all kinds of other apps from eavesdropping if the parties on each side trust each other. The tech can also be leveraged in anonymity schemes that encrypt links or circuits. It's a building block along side other building blocks. I've gotten a ton of mileage out of mine in the past with zero evidence of compromise despite clever efforts.

      Learn how it works, learn how it can go wrong, learn what it looks like done right, and start doing it right avoiding anything that's known to be wrong. It's not rocket science: just a very simple concept quite alien to most COTS and FOSS products. An exception is Micro-SINA VPN and Turaya VPN. They at least kept the TCB tiny and modular.

      *They also largely stopped buying high assurance products minus a few for select critical sites and mostly killed off that market. A combination of that, poor organizational security practices, and the post-9/11 push to knock out obstacles to info sharing have led to most of their security breaches. It doesn't say anything about the quality of the good stuff.

    3. Re:NSA-resistant VPN's were done before... by AHuxley · · Score: 1

      If "It's not rocket science" then how are the security services getting back to the end users over generations of networking products?
      From hardware encryption of the 1950-80's to todays VPN providers, crypto and secure networking always seems to fail or be trivial to track.
      Insiders or sealed legal letters? Front companies? Weak encryption? VPN providers reselling standard tame junk solutions every generation?

      --
      Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
    4. Re:NSA-resistant VPN's were done before... by aaaaaaargh! · · Score: 1

      The NSA's Type 1 HAIPE is a modified IPsec that passed their rigorous Type 1 development and evaluation process.

      Even nowadays and certainly then the NSA would probably not pass anything in a public competition that they couldn't break in one way ot another. At least there is no indication for it. See e.g. the clipper chip debacle or the NSA's role in the development of bogus mobile phone encryption standards. Moreover, you presumably have no clue about what they use internally (and if you had, you weren't allowed to tell us).

      So no, the only agency that can tell whether a given VPN is NSA-reistant is the NSA or another agency that has infiltrated the NSA very thoroughly - the latter being quite possible if not likely, given how easy it was for Snowden to leak so many documents.

    5. Re:NSA-resistant VPN's were done before... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You make so many nonsensical, unsubstantiated generalizations that it is painful to read your post.

      You obviously have more opinions than expertise.

    6. Re:NSA-resistant VPN's were done before... by Kishin · · Score: 1

      Read the link I posted in my original post showing what a high assurance secure design takes. Now, look at all the designs you referenced and typical commercial development practices. You should see a *HUGE* gap between the two. For starters, the design must be as such that every state the system might be in is known, every error state is shown to fail safe, only the strongest configurations are used, an inspection happens for every known weakness, safe subsets are used for the coding, those are extensively tested, covert channel analysis, minimal TCB, and so on. Such methods would've prevented Heartbleed and AES timing attacks among others. Yet, companies time and time again do whatever maximizes profit. And then the software gets smashed.

      Security against High Strength Attackers often takes at least 30% of the project budget. It also takes many compromises on features and hurts time to market. On the other hand, there's some companies doing at least medium assurance with good results. Example: Matasano's review of Secure64 DNS on SourceT OS says they couldn't begin to figure out how to do a code injection on such a design. Sentinel's HYDRA firewall got similar remarks from NSA evaluators a while back. Two high assurance designs still available are Boeing SNS and GHS INTEGRITY-178B. All are in use by defense contractors to protect high value assets. Such solutions aren't cheap or pretty, though. So most companies buy cheap, full-featured alternatives that are developed with commercial best practices (read: hackerbait). That's why *those* products keep getting hacked.

    7. Re:NSA-resistant VPN's were done before... by Kishin · · Score: 1

      I agree on the public competition. The good news is that we learned much of what we need back in Orange Book days when everyone was sharing stuff publicly. Dozens of papers on high assurance security. Academia and commercial sector has only added to this. The thing that trips people up is it's scattered everywhere. That's why I've been making integrated frameworks like I referenced in the link. Contrary to your belief, the NSA *does* tell us how to build something secure although they skirt on the requirements a bit. Just apply Common Criteria EAL6-7 to a system like SAFE or CHERI at every layer and integration point. Add EMSEC and physical security. Done. It will take time and cost you plenty, but it's doable. They'll even certify it because they can then export restrict it and kill your ROI. ;) I'd have it evaluated privately by top security engineers against their criteria and NSA's. Then, they post a signed message on their web site with the evaluation, optionally password protected. (Or email it.) Such methods were how I did things in private sector in the past.

    8. Re:NSA-resistant VPN's were done before... by AHuxley · · Score: 1

      Re "For starters, the design must be as such that every state the system might be in is known, every error state is shown to fail safe, only the strongest configurations are used, an inspection happens for every known weakness, safe subsets are used for the coding, those are extensively tested, covert channel analysis, minimal TCB, and so on."
      That was attempted going back to the 1950's. Martin and Mitchell defection 1960 should have been a hint:
      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...
      "Our main dissatisfaction concerned some of the practices the United States uses in gathering intelligence information ... deliberately violating the airspace of other nations ... intercepting and deciphering the secret communications of its own allies ..."
      Now into 2015 over decades of generations of hardware and software the same basic issues is still news to generations of staff.
      Nations in the 1950-1980's tried to find "commercial best practices" and all they got was NSA and GCHQ branded crypto that gave back plain text.
      Now the wider software and hardware crypto community is back to where it always was. Users been tracked and junk crypto been offered as been tested and strong.
      Backdoors, trapdoors or just staff only understanding sections of older systems and hoping the wider product range got updated by some other team?
      Users are left wondering if they are dealing with front companies set up by the security services, brands under constant NSL obligations or the staff are just really happy to sell older, junk subsystems over decades.
      Some nations got very addicted to collecting all crypto on many new networks. The good news is users now know more about what expensive networking products are really doing to secure communications.

      --
      Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
    9. Re:NSA-resistant VPN's were done before... by RoLi · · Score: 1

      If "It's not rocket science" then how are the security services getting back to the end users over generations of networking products?

      Not by "breaking" VPN.

      They compromised the hardware (got it while it was shipped) or tried dictionary attacks. The former will only work when they already read your snail-mail and the latter will only work when you use weak passwords.

      They don't have some magic pixie dust that can hack into everything.

  21. Hmmm ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The NSA are evil, and operating outside of any known laws and boundaries besides what they themselves deem appropriate. Which is everything.

    If the NSA is a hostile entity to the rights and freedoms of everyone on the planet ... there really is only one option left:

    People who work for the NSA are fair game.

    I don't want to advocate violence, but I think we have no further choice. If the NSA is going to be hostile to our liberty, then the people who make up the NSA are hostile to our liberty and need to be treated as such.

    If the NSA want to be tyrants, than a short rope or a bullet are the recourse we have left.

    Because they will never stop. And the idiots who keep making excuses for them are too stupid to understand what this really means.

    Fuck the NSA ... and, yes, I'm sure they know who is really posting this. But I don't care.

    1. Re:Hmmm ... by gweihir · · Score: 1

      I would decidedly not go that far. But a nice, concerted industry push to never, ever hire anybody that has been working for the NSA before or its contractors would send a clear message to bright young people looking for opportunities.

      --
      Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
    2. Re: Hmmm ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Won't happen. The industry doesn't go against its interests and will not set itself up as a target for government retaliation. Get used to it: the surveillance will become more and more strict, the consequences for "thinking the wrong way" will become more and more severe and the only thing we can do is resign ourselves to this fate. It's over.

    3. Re: Hmmm ... by gweihir · · Score: 1

      We will see. While I tend to agree that a new global totalitarian catastrophe is in the works, I am not totally convinced that it will happen this time. The problem is that totalitarianism and fascism are exceedingly bad for business. They always result in an economic collapse, might just take a few decades. I have some hope that plain, old-fashioned greed may safe us this time. Wouldn't that be ironic?

      --
      Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
    4. Re:Hmmm ... by Kishin · · Score: 1

      A familiar name. :) You talking about a message that the best opportunity is to ally with NSA to subvert things because otherwise won't get hired? I agree. Further, I still promote my mantra of judging what a person produces rather than the person themself. Anyone can be had in security of all types. Trust but verify: more than one person working on stuff with controls and review activities to ensure stuff is being done right. No guarantees but much better than guilt by association. Besides, most malicious insiders I've seen looked great on the surface. -Nick P

    5. Re: Hmmm ... by Kishin · · Score: 1

      Certain industry members are already doing it so you're wrong in the micro sense. In the macro sense, I totally agree and I've stayed out of the market specifically because of their power over U.S. citizens. I already know the parallel construction strategy they'd use against me. Good news is some people overseas have a chance of building something and I can at least teach people how to do it right in my various essays. More people learn from it every year although single digits lol.

  22. Re:Mother shot by 2-year child by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Unless she has a twin sister, her genes are history.

    Her genes are in the kid that shot her, unless the kid gets the death penalty.

  23. Edward Snowden by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Don't you think you should have to suffer for all the harm you've done and intend to do to the human race?"

    --Allegra, "eXistenZ"

    Sometimes I worry about Edward.

    Sometimes I worry *a lot*.

    1. Re:Edward Snowden by ChunderDownunder · · Score: 1

      Great movie.

      Deserves more praise than Inception and the Last Christmas Doctor Who special.

    2. Re: Edward Snowden by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Agreed. :) Massively underrated.

  24. Swell by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

    It's really nice when a tyrannical government agency gets cute and gives its tools of oppression pet names.

    --
    You are welcome on my lawn.
  25. Re:Mother shot by 2-year child by kwbauer · · Score: 1

    Not only off-topic but also factually incorrect. Utah is to Idaho as California is to Oregon or as South Australia is to Northern Territory or even as England is to Scotland.

  26. Well, in that case.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    My computer has a Corbomite device. If I am compromised, everyone please avoid this IP address for the next 20 solar years..

  27. Re:Mother shot by 2-year child by mallyn · · Score: 1
    Good try.

    But no cookie :(

    It appears that all of Walmart's IP's are in one netblock.

    Here is the link to the report:

    http://ipinfo.io/AS46312

    161.169.64.0/18 Wal-Mart Stores 16,384

    I believe that all of their web stuff is on ackamai.

    --
    Most Respectfully Yours Mark Allyn Bellingham, Washington
  28. Re:Mother shot by 2-year child by BarbaraHudson · · Score: 0

    Unless she has a twin sister, her genes are history.

    Her genes are in the kid that shot her, unless the kid gets the death penalty.

    No, that's not how it works. Her genes would only be in the kid if the kid was a clone. What's in the kid is a unique amalgam composed of the genetic material of two people, and easily shown to be different from the mother's genetic material. Only SOME of her genes are in the kid, but some of those same genes are in others as well.

    --
    "Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
  29. What a stupid idea ... by CaptainDork · · Score: 2, Interesting

    ... I downloaded the Tor browser and I'm, like going to cnn, disney, xvideos, and then I try going to my Facebook page and WHAM!!!!

    I'm in validation mode,

    That's much better than the "command mode" ("commode" for short), but I had to prove I am me by sending Facebook my passport and giving them my phone number.

    The fucking NSA isn't allowed to blow their cover and stuff.

    --
    It little behooves the best of us to comment on the rest of us.
  30. There is no cure for being a cunt. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    putz's

  31. This is just psychological warfare by carlhaagen · · Score: 1

    No more.

  32. Try this at home... by Kazoo+the+Clown · · Score: 1

    If the NSA can do it, maybe you can too!

  33. Ozzies? by jd2112 · · Score: 1

    Do you mean the Black Sabbath singer or the character on the 60s TV sitcom?

    --
    Any insufficiently advanced magic is indistinguishable from technology.
    1. Re:Ozzies? by sound+vision · · Score: 1

      Or the one from the 2000s sitcom... wait, that was the one from Sabbath??

  34. No brute force necessary by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    You are misrepresenting the slides IMHO, its clear they take control of the routers doing the VPN, Cisco, Juniper and Huawi were mentioned specifically. The rest isn't 'brute force' anything. Its grabbing the keys from vulnerable machines and open comms outside the VPN, so if they have the email explaining from IT on how to set up the VPN to your accounting department, they have your companies financial data.

    If that fails they hack the machines at either end. If all else fails they break in to the room and and bug the computers.

    "But for those that aren’t successfully cracked, the VPN Exploit Team’s presentation noted, the team works to “turn that frown upside down” by doing more data collection—trying to capture IPSec Internet Key Exchange (IKE) and Encapsulating Security Payload (ESP) traffic during VPN handshakes to help build better attacks. In cases where the keys just can’t be recovered, the VPN Exploit Team will “contact our friends for help”— gathering more information on the systems of interest from other data collection sites or doing an end-run by calling on Tailored Access Operations to “create access points” through exploits of one of the endpoints of the VPN connection."

    You are pretending they just catch weak passwords and thats garbage.

  35. We should use the DMCA by seeker_1us · · Score: 4, Interesting

    My content sent over VPNs is original work encrypted to protect it against those not authorized to have a copy. It is thus covered by copyright law. The NSA is circumventing encryption to obtain illegal access to copyright work.

    1. Re:We should use the DMCA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That depends on the content. Most content, such as business email, server logs, accounting records are not covered by copyright law.

    2. Re: We should use the DMCA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If the government does it it's not illegal. When are you going to grow up and accept that there are different laws for the little people and fof Kings and their servants? Learn to behave before you and your family are made to suffer for it.

    3. Re:We should use the DMCA by radarskiy · · Score: 2

      Your EULA grants the ISP a perpetual transferable right to your data, or else it would be a copyright violation for them to transmit it anywhere. They can then sub-license to whomever in exchange for not being named an accessory for every criminal act that involved a communication that crossed their network.

    4. Re:We should use the DMCA by turp182 · · Score: 1

      True, but if the transmission is encrypted, wouldn't that be in violation of the DMCA?

      If so the government owes a lot of people a ton of money (even for single offenses) if they are decrypting anything. There is implicit copyright to most everything we say/write (at least there is for anything of consequential complexity or value).

      In fact, per Wikipedia: (The DMCA) It also criminalizes the act of circumventing an access control, whether or not there is actual infringement of copyright itself.

      Encryption is an "access control".

      Class action lawsuit anyone???

      --
      BlameBillCosby.com
    5. Re:We should use the DMCA by radarskiy · · Score: 1

      Law enforcement has a blanket exemption. ISPs have an safe-harbor exemption that protects them from vicarious liability.

    6. Re:We should use the DMCA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Law enforcement has a blanket exemption.

      If that's the case then 'Law enforcement' might be hearing from the MPAA's army of lawyers on retainers.

  36. all countries do this espionage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    truth be told all countries with the expertise do this espoionage + the rouge hackers so best to invest in cryptology

    1. Re:all countries do this espionage by RoLi · · Score: 1

      No. I live in a small country (less than 10 Mio pop.) and we have only a rudimentary espionage agency that only seems to exists as an excuse (they never did anything notable - ever).

      And you know what? No false flag terror attacks, no privacy invasions, no nothing.

  37. SSH is blocked in lots of represive regimes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

    SSH is great technology because the certificate is self signed and relies on TIME to protect it, even the NSA can't travel back in time and do a man in the middle attack on the first SSH link and every subsequent SSH session between those computers, to swap that cert.

    Likewise the documents said NSA was intercepting 10 million TLS (HTTPS) a day. By now, three years later that will be 100 million or a billion. The problem is the certificate authorities are US companies and all backdoored by the NSA. SSH doesn't have this problem, the certificate is self signed, we don't trust the certificate authority to verify the source of the certificate as us and not the NSA.

    Also my port 22 SSH is blocked, and I live in one of those Asian repressive regimes, so I take it as a sign that SSH is considered secure by said repressive regime because they block it.

    1. Re:SSH is blocked in lots of represive regimes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Some SSH has been reported cracked, I'm not skilled enough in cryptography to understand, but from comments it appears to be limited. https://www.schneier.com/blog/archives/2014/12/new_documents_o.html

    2. Re:SSH is blocked in lots of represive regimes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you can spare the CPU power, send SSH through the VPN. When they finally break the VPN, they will be very annoyed they have accomplished nothing.

      The real reason the oppressive Asian nations don't block VPN solutions popular with corporations is they would not do business anymore if they did.

  38. The NSA by kelemvor4 · · Score: 1

    Sounds like a fun place to work. They have all the toys.

    1. Re:The NSA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not for everyone. Although I generally like queer culture, I'm not into this gay military thing.

  39. So by rossdee · · Score: 1

    We should switch to using Cardassian Codes - the NSA and their Vulcan advisors won't be able to decrypt that.

  40. Re:Mother shot by 2-year child by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

    Unless she has a twin sister, her genes are history.

    Her genes are in the kid that shot her, unless the kid gets the death penalty.

    No, that's not how it works. Her genes would only be in the kid if the kid was a clone.

    Oh, good lord. Fine. Then by your pointlessly pedantic semantic lawyering, no mammal has ever passed on their genes, and every individual's genes are culled from the gene pool.

    You can't split hairs by trying to disingenuously pretend the "passing on genes" synecdoche is understood differently than it is. People understand that children aren't clones, and they still call it passing on their genes.

  41. But there's no such thing as a vulcan death grip. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    even if the Romulans or the NSA thinks there is.

  42. Ewww by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    BTW I never saw the reference video... is it still out there?

  43. NSA-resistant VPN's are easy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    NSA resistant VPNs are easy, just XOR a few times with a HUGE random key you exchanged MANUALLY at both ends.
    i.e. a one-time-pad.

    Its not necessary to have a computationally difficult algorithm when we can move very large random keys (by large I mean terrabytes of random not kilobytes of key) carried easily by trusted employee. The nature of the key means it is not reused and not subject to pattern analysis.

    We need to add extra layers like this to all comms now that we find the kit we've been using has been backdoored.

  44. Rest assured friends by AnonymousCoward1998 · · Score: 1

    NSA already has the capability to decrypt anything commercially available put in front of them. CALEA just gives other agencies access to similar information, but through more transparent channels (SNMP provisioning of traffic mirroring in ISP backbone routers). NSA is actually NOT the brain trust of our government when it comes to IT/Network security. The most talented group of technologists actually work for USAF Central Command. My opinion, of course. If I were sitting on a tank of gasoline hung over a bonfire, and the only way I escaped was if a security expert broke the payload of some piece of data transiting the globe, I would want a guy from USAF CentCom working on the challenge. Not saying NSA analysts aren't capable, but I'd trust those guys over an outsourced NSA contractor any day of the week.

  45. How to defeat NSA ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    After reading so many comments I fail to find a single comment that talks / asks about ways to defeat NSA's snooping, so I am asking ...
     
    Can someone please share with us what we should / can do to defeat (if not a total blockage, at least slow down) NSA's snooping on us, whether on VPN, or off

    Anyone ?

    1. Re: How to defeat NSA ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can't defeat the NSA. Ever. They have more resources than anyone else and if by sheer miracle any individual/group should happen to find some way to truly make life difficult for them, that group/individual would be "persuaded" to stop. You have seen what happened to TrueCrypt, haven't you? You can't fight the US government. Your own country will not protect you out of fear of reprisals.

    2. Re:How to defeat NSA ? by John.Banister · · Score: 1

      Read the Spiegel article and learn the security methods that might still work. Using these methods, secure all your communication all the time. If everyone does that, then the NSA has to hire more people to sort away the chaff. The more people they hire, the greater the likelihood that they again hire someone with a conscience.

      Method 2. Live two lives, one that's fake and boring, and another that's secret and furtive. Hide the limited second life amongst the chatter of the first. This method will work better if everyone with boring lives are securing all their communication all the time.

    3. Re:How to defeat NSA ? by g0bshiTe · · Score: 1

      1. Lobby for internet standards to change and remove the ability from any governments to encroach on it.
      2. Overthrow the government and replace it with a better functioning governing body.
      3. Elect officials who want smaller government and aren't corruptible.
      4. Use snail mail.

      --
      I am Bennett Haselton! I am Bennett Haselton!
    4. Re:How to defeat NSA ? by eric_harris_76 · · Score: 1

      "everyone with boring lives are securing all their communication all the time"

      Challenge accepted!

      --
      There's no time like the present. Well, the past used to be.
    5. Re:How to defeat NSA ? by dl_sledding · · Score: 1

      ...4. Use snail mail.

      Um... Use a government-sanctioned and funded organization that has PHYSICAL ACCESS to the communication you are trying to protect???

      Just curious: brain fart?

  46. Why decrypt most of it? by ruir · · Score: 1

    I am pretty sure that MS, Cisco and Checkpoint will have mandatory backdoors for their VPN services, and that it wont help to your security not using private certificates.

  47. Vulcan? They should be Cardassian names by bussdriver · · Score: 1

    They act far more like Cardassians, they should use the planet that fits their role best.

    Vulcan's only pull that crap in that lousy Enterprise series.

  48. OpenVPN is not VPN by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A. If you choose your device and provider wisely you can avoid sheep-alism
    B. Take a closer look at your pwd and cert
    C. Never use your everyday OS
    D. You can always check if your connection is monitored or insecure

    s6d

  49. What a load of corbomite! by Chelloveck · · Score: 1

    They really call it VULCANDEATHGRIP? As I recall (and Memory Alpha confirms) the "Vulcan death grip" does not exist, it was merely a ruse used to fool the Romulans. Given the code name I surmise that the ability to crack VPNs doesn't exist, the NSA just wants us to believe that it does.

    Next they'll be telling us that if they go "by the book, hours will seem like days". We see through your clever wordplay, NSA!

    P.S. Deal me in for the Tuesday night fizzbin game. I want a piece of that action!

    --
    Chelloveck
    I give up on debugging. From now on, SIGSEGV is a feature.
  50. NSA can enjoy my Netflix stream for free then ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... because that is about all I use my vpn for since Netflix is blocked over here. Occasionally I put my normal other traffic through the vpn but not for any particular privacy reason, unless I'm doing internet banking on wifi. Exciting espionage stuff not!

  51. Re:Mother shot by 2-year child by BarbaraHudson · · Score: 0

    Normally I wouldn't be so pedantic, but this whole notion has caused a lot of harm. Too many people still see their offspring as "continuing the line" or "passing on the genes" and try to mold their kids into mini me's of themselves. They get angry when their kids act differently than they "expect", rather than being fascinated with how their kids are unique people, and grow into their own unique place in the world.

    Too many people put too much value in the fiction of "passing on their genes" as actually having any real meaning. We are more than our genes. But please think of this - if people weren't so hung up on "genetic lineage", nobody would see adopted children as being any different from "their own" children, causing a lot less hassles for those who adopt.

    --
    "Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
  52. Plugging my own SCI-FI take on this by overheardinpdx · · Score: 1

    I suppose you guys will shred me for this, but I took on this topic in my SCI-FI story, "The Observer Effect" where a scientist attempts to prove the existence of god through a kind of "cat in the box" experiment using a large cluster spun up on AWS. You can imagine that it doesn't end well. http://insidehpc.com/2013/11/o... For my day job, I write tech news at insideHPC. Forgive me for sharing my hobby here, but I think it has something to say about this topic. -Rich

  53. NSA cracked VPNS, you wont believe what they found by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "MY GOD, ITS FULL OF GOATSE!"

  54. Physically compromising routers is "mundane"? by Rujiel · · Score: 1

    Snowden's leaks revealed how Cisco routers set to be exported were intercepted and physically compromised. I wouldn't say that the information reveleaed about the NSA's techniques is mundane in the least.

    1. Re:Physically compromising routers is "mundane"? by phantomfive · · Score: 1

      From a mathematical/security viewpoint, that's mundane. Compared to a simple way to factor large numbers, that's mundane.

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    2. Re:Physically compromising routers is "mundane"? by Rujiel · · Score: 1

      A hardware-maker allowing its devices to be physically compromised by the government is absolutely not mundane--give me one example of this news being reported elsewhere before the Snowden leaks. Our own government disagrees with you, since it has taken great lengths to warn US businesses not to use Chinese networking hardware, for fear that the Chinese would do just what it is proven our own government has done.

      http://www.reuters.com/article...

      "Committee Chairman Mike Rogers, at a press conference to release the report, said companies that had used Huawei equipment had reported "numerous allegations" of unexpected behavior, including routers supposedly sending large data packs to China late at night."

      And international markets agree with me (and not you) on the gravity of this news for Cisco's outlook:

      http://www.businessinsider.com...

      Cisco's CEO, John Chambers:

      âoeI do think (the NSA revelation) is a factor in China.â In May 2014, in response to the alleged NSA spying programs, Chambers wrote the Obama Administration, âoeif these allegations are true, these actions will undermine confidence in our industry and in the ability of technology companies to deliver products globally.â

      From a former NSA agent:
      "The constant stream of news about NSAâ(TM)s activities has raised broader questions, particularly internationally, about the security of technologies coming from U.S. companies. This has been measurably hitting the bottom lines of companies like Cisco and Juniper and caused many companies to look to alternatives like Huawei."

      How's that for "mundane"?

    3. Re:Physically compromising routers is "mundane"? by phantomfive · · Score: 1

      It's pretty mundane, trojan horses have been around since the time of the trojans, pardon the expression. Governments and people haven't changed.

      But Archimedes was something special. You don't see something like Archimedes every day. And you don't discover a method for factoring large numbers every millennia.

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
  55. Re: Can't troll worth a shit, so wall of text? by khayman80 · · Score: 1

    Look, all this isn't remotely believable. You clearly compounded that account's massive spamming attempts by needlessly quoting obscenely huge chunks of his nonsense. [Rujiel, 2014-12-28]

    Needlessly? How else should I debunk his baseless claim that I was "rude and insulting" when Jane/Lonny Eachus was actually just projecting his own obscene insults onto me? And if you have a better approach in mind, why not just suggest that better approach rather than repeatedly suggest that I kill myself?

    Are they hiring you losers while still in high school these days? The bar for paid oil trolls sure is a low one--any stupid thing to prevent the discussion of the oil cartel's impunity. Do the world a favor and kill yourself. [Rujiel, 2014-11-20]

    He's a paid shill and so are you--no amount of verbose whining on your part could hide the role of spamming you were playing in that thread. [Rujiel, 2014-12-28]

    Once again, Rujiel accuses me of being a paid oil shill. But once again, why would the oil industry pay me to debunk the same baseless accusations they're helping to spread? I've been debunking misinformation about climate from Jane/Lonny Eachus and many others for 5 years now. Again, why would the oil industry pay me to do that?

    ... Save our collective unconscious from your fevered ego--kill yourself. your net sum contribution to society is at a negative. [Rujiel, 2014-11-26]

    Really? Among other things, I've contributed open source software to estimate mass changes on the surface of the Earth using GRACE satellite data. Here's my dissertation which explains the methods. Does that count for anything, or should I kill myself?

    Your response is akin to someone who has just spent the last hour rolling in his own shit and flinging it at passers-by, standing up all at once and asking the surrounding crowd what's wrong. You're seriously so bad at this. Even your employer would be better off if you killed yourself. [Rujiel, 2014-11-30]

    I really don't understand why people like Jane/Lonny Eachus and Rujiel are filled with so much hatred. However, sociology research suggests that people are less likely to hurl abuse at other people after seeing their faces. So here I am at JPL's open house explaining that our CO2 emissions are melting ice sheets. And here's a clip from the Weather Channel where I explained (at 19m36s and 26m34s) how NASA measures these ice sheets from space.

    Rujiel, now that you've seen my face, do you still hate me so much that you still think I should kill myself? Or would you like to retract those odious statements?

  56. Re:Mother shot by 2-year child by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think you mean Idaho is to Utah as California is to Oregon.

  57. Script-Kiddies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We are spending billions to employ script-kiddies.

    No new skills, no new factorization techniques; just a vast store of traffic for replay and a cache of fumbled keys.

    Weakness.

  58. They may have a "Vulcan Death Grip" on VPNs by idbeholda · · Score: 1

    But they still don't understand why kids love Cinnamon Toast Crunch.

  59. NSA is the new NASA by FreedomFirstThenPeac · · Score: 1

    A poster wondered if anyone else has the Intelligence gathering budget that the US does. I wonder if NSA is the new NASA, in that it provides jobs for geeks the way the space program did. And by geeks I mean those gifted individuals who would be bored trying to help K-Tar-Mart better ship and sell diapers and bottled water. Give them a mission (save the world from terror, get to the moon) and make them feel special. Keep them busy so they don't just hack apart your world.

    --
    "There is no god but allah" - well, they got it half right.
  60. Re: Can't troll worth a shit, so wall of text? by Rujiel · · Score: 1

    And your response now to my calling you out for posting spam... is to spam a different topic with unrelated garbage? Are you even sentient? Or are you just so scared of being called out that you hope if you try to harass me, I'll go away?

  61. Re: Can't troll worth a shit, so wall of text? by khayman80 · · Score: 1

    And your response now to my calling you out for posting spam... is to spam a different topic with unrelated garbage? Are you even sentient? Or are you just so scared of being called out that you hope if you try to harass me, I'll go away? [Rujiel, 2015-01-02]

    You didn't call me out for posting spam. You repeatedly told me to kill myself. There's a difference. Once again:

    Look, all this isn't remotely believable. You clearly compounded that account's massive spamming attempts by needlessly quoting obscenely huge chunks of his nonsense. [Rujiel, 2014-12-28]

    Needlessly? How else should I debunk his baseless claim that I was "rude and insulting" when Jane/Lonny Eachus was actually just projecting his own obscene insults onto me? And if you have a better approach in mind, why not just suggest that better approach rather than repeatedly suggest that I kill myself?

    Are they hiring you losers while still in high school these days? The bar for paid oil trolls sure is a low one--any stupid thing to prevent the discussion of the oil cartel's impunity. Do the world a favor and kill yourself. [Rujiel, 2014-11-20]

    He's a paid shill and so are you--no amount of verbose whining on your part could hide the role of spamming you were playing in that thread. [Rujiel, 2014-12-28]

    Once again, Rujiel accuses me of being a paid oil shill. But once again, why would the oil industry pay me to debunk the same baseless accusations they're helping to spread? I've been debunking misinformation about climate from Jane/Lonny Eachus and many others for 5 years now. Again, why would the oil industry pay me to do that?

    ... Save our collective unconscious from your fevered ego--kill yourself. your net sum contribution to society is at a negative. [Rujiel, 2014-11-26]

    Really? Among other things, I've contributed open source software to estimate mass changes on the surface of the Earth using GRACE satellite data. Here's my dissertation which explains the methods. Does that count for anything, or should I kill myself?

    Your response is akin to someone who has just spent the last hour rolling in his own shit and flinging it at passers-by, standing up all at once and asking the surrounding crowd what's wrong. You're seriously so bad at this. Even your employer would be better off if you killed yourself. [Rujiel, 2014-11-30]

    I really don't understand why people like Jane/Lonny Eachus and Rujiel are filled with so much hatred. However, sociology research suggests that people are less likely to hurl abuse at other people after seeing their faces. So here I am at JPL's open house explaining that our CO2 emissions are melting ice sheets. And here's a clip from the Weather Channel where I explained (at 19m36s

  62. Re:Mother shot by 2-year child by kwbauer · · Score: 1

    No Utah is south of Idaho as California is south of Oregon. At least it is on every map I've ever seen.

  63. But... the analogy doesn't work right... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The Vulcan death grip was a feint, invented by Spock to get out of a crisis situation. If the NSA is truly using the "vulcan death grip" analogy correctly, that means they don't have shit.