Just today I made water not wet. I made an ice cube.
The media leviathans attempting to make uncopyable bits do not need completely uncopyable bits to achieve success. They only need to make it hard enough that the vast majority of people cannot routinely make copies of the content.
And here's half the problem: does "Open XMMS, XChat, Mozilla and Emacs on workspace 1, 2, 3, and 4" mean you want them respectively on each workspace or separate copies on each workspace?
We tend to be very ambiguous with speech. I'd say there's speech recognition, and then speech comprehension (which are tied together, of course, due to contextual cues within phrases).
American/.ers might finally stop hearing the snarky comments from the European/.ers about how enlightened their copyright rules are every time the DMCA is mentioned.
Our governments are all beholden to corporate greed, it's only a matter of degrees - not orders of magnitude.
If you'd actually done some homework on this one, you'd discover that it has nothing to do with buffer overflows. The error could have been done in any language: the problem is a check for greater-than when it should have been greater-than-or-equals. A "modern safe language" would not have solved this.
See the patch at http://www.pine.nl/advisories/pine-cert-20020301.p atch
The advisory is at http://www.pine.nl/advisories/pine-cert-20020301.t xt
Verizon Wireless in Massachusetts is excellent. I switched probably 7 years ago and have rarely been disappointed. I keep looking at other providers in the area, but Verizon's great coverage still beats the others hands down.
For the past couple of years I also had Nextel service (for work). It wasn't terrible, but it took them a long time to even get around to enabling all the features on my phone. And coworkers had lots of trouble with the coverage area, although in my travels, it was fair. Not nearly as good as Verizon Wireless.
The snide comment by the editor is uncalled for. I don't mind bashing entities when they deserve it, but that's not the case here. Now, if this was a story about Verizon...
If they flew under their own names, why wasn't that flagged? And if it wasn't, what makes anyone think that facial recognition will do a better job than a simple name check?
Let's start with checking names, and go from there.
Although I hate to bring this up, I imagine you could kill many thousands with a train or a bus. A train loaded with some kind of explosive and headed uncontrollably into any major station; a bus could be driven into a large terminal.
There are no perfect solutions. As we have so sadly learned this past week, the price of being a shining beacon of freedom is a very high price indeed. Of course, reasonable security precautions should be implemented. But to eliminate part of what makes this country so strong, or to allow the country to head down a slippery slope, is a dishonor to the hundreds of thousands of Americans who have died so we could so richly enjoy these freedoms.
First, the US has about 270M people. That means there are 27,000 other people with similar prints.
Second, within a city, there might be a higher percentage of people with similar prints than you might expect. Have you ever heard of the birthday problem in statistics? Given a group of 25 people, there's a greater than 50% likelihood that two people share the same birthday. Perhaps a statistician could follow-up with the correct analysis of these figures.
But it's certainly not 100 other people in the country, and it's probably even higher than you would think.
The world is waiting. They are depending on us--heck, they've handed the whole responsibility of this nightmare to the Nerds of the Net, opting to focus on simple problems like
IsraeliPalestinian-conflict, opening up of NorthKorea, the largest e-bola outbreak to date, geneticallyengineered corn reaching human-foodmarkets and other trivial minutia.
Slashdot Mirror
They have blues - just not in that particular shot. But hardly a testament to overcoming the issue.
But ... bison aren't extinct. Wouldn't just be easier to buy some buffalo meat at the local supermarket?
Just today I made water not wet. I made an ice cube.
The media leviathans attempting to make uncopyable bits do not need completely uncopyable bits to achieve success. They only need to make it hard enough that the vast majority of people cannot routinely make copies of the content.
And here's half the problem: does "Open XMMS, XChat, Mozilla and Emacs on workspace 1, 2, 3, and 4" mean you want them respectively on each workspace or separate copies on each workspace?
We tend to be very ambiguous with speech. I'd say there's speech recognition, and then speech comprehension (which are tied together, of course, due to contextual cues within phrases).
American /.ers might finally stop hearing the snarky comments from the European /.ers about how enlightened their copyright rules are every time the DMCA is mentioned.
Our governments are all beholden to corporate greed, it's only a matter of degrees - not orders of magnitude.
If you'd actually done some homework on this one, you'd discover that it has nothing to do with buffer overflows. The error could have been done in any language: the problem is a check for greater-than when it should have been greater-than-or-equals. A "modern safe language" would not have solved this.
p atch
t xt
See the patch at http://www.pine.nl/advisories/pine-cert-20020301.
The advisory is at http://www.pine.nl/advisories/pine-cert-20020301.
Verizon Wireless in Massachusetts is excellent. I switched probably 7 years ago and have rarely been disappointed. I keep looking at other providers in the area, but Verizon's great coverage still beats the others hands down.
...
For the past couple of years I also had Nextel service (for work). It wasn't terrible, but it took them a long time to even get around to enabling all the features on my phone. And coworkers had lots of trouble with the coverage area, although in my travels, it was fair. Not nearly as good as Verizon Wireless.
The snide comment by the editor is uncalled for. I don't mind bashing entities when they deserve it, but that's not the case here. Now, if this was a story about Verizon
If they flew under their own names, why wasn't that flagged? And if it wasn't, what makes anyone think that facial recognition will do a better job than a simple name check?
Let's start with checking names, and go from there.
Although I hate to bring this up, I imagine you could kill many thousands with a train or a bus. A train loaded with some kind of explosive and headed uncontrollably into any major station; a bus could be driven into a large terminal.
There are no perfect solutions. As we have so sadly learned this past week, the price of being a shining beacon of freedom is a very high price indeed. Of course, reasonable security precautions should be implemented. But to eliminate part of what makes this country so strong, or to allow the country to head down a slippery slope, is a dishonor to the hundreds of thousands of Americans who have died so we could so richly enjoy these freedoms.
First, the US has about 270M people. That means there are 27,000 other people with similar prints.
Second, within a city, there might be a higher percentage of people with similar prints than you might expect. Have you ever heard of the birthday problem in statistics? Given a group of 25 people, there's a greater than 50% likelihood that two people share the same birthday. Perhaps a statistician could follow-up with the correct analysis of these figures.
But it's certainly not 100 other people in the country, and it's probably even higher than you would think.
Ah ... the You Have Been Trolled color model, eh?
Very nice =)
I think this is a residence built with Californians in mind.
It's undersized, overpriced, has high-tech allure, and is frequently subject to the laws of motion!
Just substitute rotation for the Californian shake, rattle & roll ...