Slashdot Mirror


Alan Cox Attacks the European DMCA

forged writes "The Register already reported Alan Cox's involvement against the proposed European Union Copyright Directive before. Today, Alan Cox has issued a wake up call to the Linux community amid concerns that the pending EUCD could stymie open source development. "The directive, which was approved last year, extends European copyright legislation so that it is even more restrictive than America's controversial Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA)."" If you haven't joined the EFF (or the equivalent in your country) , now might be a good time.

224 comments

  1. uk eff? by fyonn · · Score: 1

    is there a UK wing or something similar I can give my support to?

    dave

    1. Re:uk eff? by 56ker · · Score: 2

      Don't think there is- that's why they said "equivalent in your country". EFF is an American organisation.

    2. Re:uk eff? by thebowery · · Score: 4, Informative

      http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/fsfe-uk and
      http://uk.eurorights.org/ are good places to get started

      --
      "It's better to regret something you have done, than to regret something you haven't done" - Orbital
    3. Re:uk eff? by Fig,+formerly+A.C. · · Score: 1

      Well, another poster mentioned http://www.eff-europe.org/ And I know, I didn't bother with a linky. At least you know it's not a link to goatse... :-)

      --
      Murphy was an optimist.
  2. And...? by Devil's+BSD · · Score: 0, Troll

    How is this news? About every person and slashdotter I know hates any form of the DMCA anywhere.

    --
    I'm the Devil the Windows users warned you about.
    1. Re:And...? by Lxy · · Score: 1, Offtopic

      My karma reached 50 and all I got was this lousy post.

      --

      There is no reasonable defense against an idiot with an agenda
      :wq
  3. Clean out your head gear, Alan by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    the DMCA isn't about freedom. If I'm going to attack someone for a word, my word is POONTANG.

  4. um... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    from the alan-cox-is-xoc-nala-spelled-backwards dept.

    shouldnt that be:
    from the xoc-nala-is-alan-cox-spelled-backwards dept.

    ???

    1. Re:um... by JordanH · · Score: 1

      • from the alan-cox-is-xoc-nala-spelled-backwards dept.

      This brought to you:

      • from the can't think of a single witty thing to say dept.
  5. Finally... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful
    Now all your smarmy Europeans have your own DMCA we Americans can bash you about...

    At least OURS isn't as BAD as YOURS!

  6. Where will Alan Go? by Christianfreak · · Score: 2, Funny

    Well if this passes in Europe I wonder where Alan Cox will move too. South America. Pretty soon he might have to consider the moon...

    :)

    1. Re:Where will Alan Go? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      iirc, cox works for redhat, which is in north carolina

    2. Re:Where will Alan Go? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      My friend, have you heard of this wonderful thing called "The Internet" that allows one to communicate and even work from a distance?

      "They have the Internet for computers now!" -- Homer J Simpson.

    3. Re:Where will Alan Go? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you seem to be missing something: your point

    4. Re:Where will Alan Go? by qslack · · Score: 1

      Or he could move to Antarctica to be with the penguins and all. It'd probably be a pretty good source of inspiration for him.

      Who knows, maybe he could even write up a fly() routine for them.

    5. Re:Where will Alan Go? by n9hmg · · Score: 1

      fly()
      If he did, I wouldn't be surprised. Are the primitives already there, or would it have to go into the kernel?

    6. Re:Where will Alan Go? by 0x0d0a · · Score: 1

      Sealand

    7. Re:Where will Alan Go? by Col.+Panic · · Score: 1

      I'm not so worried about where he'll move to, but where will he post the changelog?

  7. is it as restrictive as SSSCA? by Husaria · · Score: 2, Interesting

    can we consider this as bad as that law? Analysists have said that Europe is headed towards a left wing bend, but yet those amongst the right wing are rising, (ie: france). This law would be something the left would devise, but yet some Europeans are feeling reactionary now, so would this law even come to pass?
    If ordinary Europeans don't, then its up to us then

    1. Re:is it as restrictive as SSSCA? by martissimo · · Score: 2

      it's not fair to compare this to SSSCA or CBDTPA... it's comparable to the DMCA for a reason, they are both copyright protection laws.

      the SSSCA and CBDTPA are/were proposed as hardware regulations

    2. Re:is it as restrictive as SSSCA? by Captain+Morgan · · Score: 1

      "This law would be something the left would devise"

      Uh... left == liberal == free thinking and open minded. Senator Hollings is basically a republican in disguise since he is promoting the corporate agenda of content control that the media companies want. I'm all for them controling their content but lets have them come up with a better way of doing so since unlike things that cause serious damage, like guns and cars, I don't think we need to legislate content control technologies. On top of the fact that they are less than likely to work considering the dropped ball on CSS and SDMI.

    3. Re:is it as restrictive as SSSCA? by moonbender · · Score: 1

      Europe isn't headed for a left wing bend. It was, a couple of years ago, but that's the past. Right-wing populist are in now. Ack.

      --
      Switch back to Slashdot's D1 system.
    4. Re:is it as restrictive as SSSCA? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There is no such thing as the "right-wing" in France. Even the supposed "right-wing" in France are basically socialists.

    5. Re:is it as restrictive as SSSCA? by martyn+s · · Score: 1

      It seems like you meant to say "left == liberal == free thinking == open minded == does the right thing." Maybe you should rethink that, and realize that maybe "left == liberal == free thinking == open minded == willing to sacrifice the integrity of our constitution."

    6. Re:is it as restrictive as SSSCA? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How d'ya know? You must one of those commie European tree-hugging hippy sovjet spies!

    7. Re:is it as restrictive as SSSCA? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      the SSSCA and CBDTPA are/were proposed as hardware regulations
      ...to do with enforcing copyright protection in hardware. It seems quite possible to me that a copyright law would cover this.
    8. Re:is it as restrictive as SSSCA? by joss · · Score: 3, Insightful

      What the hell is the point of trying to classify policies as left or right ?

      There are a million issues, even if they were all simple binary choices, there are 2^N different opinions a person could have. Sure, there are certain correlations between issues. If you believe in death penalty, you are more likely to believe in corporal punishment, but are not certain to.

      Since you only get to choose between two options at election time, it suits people to pretend that everything is either "left" or "right". Then they get confused about whether a policy is left or right. It's an extraordinary mass psychosis.

      --
      http://rareformnewmedia.com/
    9. Re:is it as restrictive as SSSCA? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      this post is such total crap.
      pls mod it yo like -1000000

      "Analysists have said that Europe is headed towards a left wing bend"
      as ever analysts predicting the future by beleiving their own tripe,
      and looking at yesterday.

      "those amongst the right wing are rising"
      a freak result jean marie le penne (in france for the geopolitically chalenged) polled 15 %
      and made the next round due solely to voter APATHY.

      "This law would be something the left would devise"
      ignorance

      "some Europeans are feeling reactionary now"
      who ? me ;-)
      this poster certainly is no european.

  8. An European DMCA, the last thing we need... by danro · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Maybe I should put my money where my mouth is and join the EEF Europe or some similar organisation.

    The EU is trying to take away a very good reason to live in Europe...
    And after seeing what the DMCA has done to the US...
    Time to get on the barricades I guess.

    --

    "First lesson," Jon said. "Stick them with the pointy end."
    1. Re:An European DMCA, the last thing we need... by 56ker · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      "The EU is trying to take away a very good reason to live in Europe..." - and which good reason would that be?

    2. Re:An European DMCA, the last thing we need... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Nice karma whoring. Bravo.

      And after seeing what the DMCA has done to the US...

      Care to share what you've seen? Anything tangible? What, the dozens of arrests? (not) The chill on free speech? (not) What, then, oh mighty karma whore, have you seen?

    3. Re:An European DMCA, the last thing we need... by danro · · Score: 2

      Care to share what you've seen? Anything tangible? What, the dozens of arrests? (not) The chill on free speech? (not) What, then, oh mighty karma whore, have you seen?

      No chill on free speech?
      Oh my!
      If an AC says so I must surely be mistaken.
      Do the names Edward Felten and Dimitri Skylarov mean anything to you?

      Keep your crappy laws of my zeroes and ones!

      --

      "First lesson," Jon said. "Stick them with the pointy end."
    4. Re:An European DMCA, the last thing we need... by 56ker · · Score: 2

      At the moment it's just a mailing list & you can hardly call one person an organisation!

  9. Not sure I understand? by Yoda2 · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Umm, like, where is this Europe people keep talking about? Is that like near Canada or something?

    1. Re:Not sure I understand? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      bloody americans

  10. Restrictions Create Pressure by 4of12 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    For the record I'm totally against the DMCA and this similar abomination in the EU.

    That said, would not overly restrictive legislation like this provide strong incentive for consumers to adopt freely available formats that are not encumbered?

    If all the big-name commercially-produced for-pay video and audio comes locked up with so many chains, and I can produce my own audio and video in an open format that gets distributed for free without restriction, won't people naturally want viewers for the free formats and content creators for the free formats (a la home movies, etc?)

    I mean, a free open standard has worked pretty well for HTML.

    --
    "Provided by the management for your protection."
    1. Re:Restrictions Create Pressure by Lysander+Luddite · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The pros won't use open formats - they want to get paid and are essentially work for hire anyway. So they'll use whatever they are told to or whatever the majority of the hardware players will play back (most likely WMP in 2-3 years).

      Joe Six Pack may use open formats, but do you want to see his home movie with his family drinking and doing donuts in his mud filled yard next to his trailer?

      Neither do I.

    2. Re:Restrictions Create Pressure by Bouncings · · Score: 3, Insightful

      That said, would not overly restrictive legislation like this provide strong incentive for consumers to adopt freely available formats that are not encumbered?

      No. The goal here is to attack freely available formats and formats that don't restrict user access. Do you think the RIAA would like to ban mp3? This is just one step closer. With this kind of legislation, before long, there will be no free formats, as they are tools only a "pirate" would have reason to use over the proprietary tools.

      I can see it now. RIAA whore: "With the RIAA's secure file format, the only reason you could want to use a format like mp3 is to steal. Banning mp3 is just common sense."

      There is no positive side of laws such as this.

      --
      -- Ken Kinder ken@_nospam_kenkinder.com http://kenkinder.com/
    3. Re:Restrictions Create Pressure by Lemmy+Caution · · Score: 2
      That said, would not overly restrictive legislation like this provide strong incentive for consumers to adopt freely available formats that are not encumbered?
      It hasn't worked that way in the US. People buy what's available and at hand, what's been distributed to them; what all the information they get tells them is the one to get, in formats that the content distributors provide. If you want to hear your favorite band, it doesn't do much good for me to say, "well, you can listen to *my* band, the Righteous Geeks of Cambridge, without the restrictive content control." You're likely to say "who the hell are they? I want the Faves."
    4. Re:Restrictions Create Pressure by Jon+Howard · · Score: 1

      The problem is that it will be impossible (without some miraculous new technology - like quantum cryptography) to create free software which can protect IP as proscribed, it could also make free software which attempts to ignore this aspect of computing illegal because of its functionality as a circumvention device.

    5. Re:Restrictions Create Pressure by EverDense · · Score: 1

      Joe Six Pack may use open formats, but do
      you want to see his home movie with his
      family drinking and doing donuts in his mud
      filled yard next to his trailer?


      Hell YEAH!
      Got a link for that one?

      --
      http://jesus.everdense.com/
    6. Re:Restrictions Create Pressure by Lysander+Luddite · · Score: 2

      See if you can track down a West Virginia Public Television tape called "The Dancing Outlaw". It is the craziest thing I have ever seen and it is all true. The scene I described above happened in that video, but it was the most sensible thing in the movie.

      Combine a folk dancing Elvis impersonator from the hills who has huffed too much gasoline (out of an RC can) with a stream of consciousness storytelling style and you get Jessico, the man who thinks Jesus saved him so that he could tell his visitors about his sunglasses.

      Um yeah.

  11. EFF Membership by Fig,+formerly+A.C. · · Score: 3, Informative

    I was suprised that they require a donation to become a member. I realize they need the money, but it seems to me they would have more political clout if their total membership tally were much larger - and making donations optional would certainly accomplish this. People who will give money would do it anyway, people who are too broke to pledge monetary support might still like to be counted as against draconian measures like the DMCA...

    --
    Murphy was an optimist.
    1. Re:EFF Membership by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Very true, I am gonna e-mail them and let them know that, I suggest you and others do the same.

    2. Re:EFF Membership by asv108 · · Score: 5, Insightful
      but it seems to me they would have more political clout if their total membership tally were much larger

      If this were true most political organizations would offer a free membership but there are probably two reasons why they don't:

      • Money Talks..
      • Less people would pay because they could get the same "inner reward" by joining for free.
      If a political foundation had to choose between a million free members, or a million dollars, they would probably choose the latter because the fact is money will bring you more influence. The free membership option would cannibalize their lower value donations which the EFF depends on. For example, the NRA counts on having gun-toting hicks send in their $25/year do you think the hicks would still pay if they could say they are an NRA member and not pay a dime?

      There is nobody, I mean NOBODY here who can't spare $25 bucks for the EFF. I'm sick of hearing sob stories on here about poor students who can't spare a dime yet they probably spend 20 hours a week trolling slashdot. Go work at McDonald's for a day, quit, and then send your paycheck to the EFF.

    3. Re:EFF Membership by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Go work at McDonald's for a day, quit, and then send your paycheck to the EFF

      Didn't notice that one on your resume.

      Horse pucky! This argument exemplifies the sorry state of political awareness in Western democracies. Money does not talk. People talk. I for one am extremely reluctant to contribute to organizations that do nothing but talk to politicians on my behalf. When I have something to say to a politician, I say it. And usually I get a reply, sometimes even a personal reply. And most importantly, I vote. That is the most direct expression of political will available to a citizen of a representitive government, and politicians do listen to that (that whole Florida vote count fiasco notwithstanding).

      If you ever needed to work for a company as odious as McDonald's, perhaps you would understand the value of money, and why it shouldn't be tossed around willynilly in lieu of saying something meaningful.

    4. Re:EFF Membership by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'll support the DMCA and anything else the EFF is against, if it will rid the world of true 'hicks' like you.

      Liberal scum like you, who cannot be bothered to educate themselves or watch over their children, are the only ones who refer to the NRA membership as 'gun-toting' hicks.

      Please, go work at McDonald's, so that you might stop trolling Slashdot for 20 hours a week.

    5. Re:EFF Membership by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I am sorry but the EFF far to often does NOT speak for me. Based on that they will be getting none of my money. Their heart is often in the right place but their head is nearly always in the wrong.

    6. Re:EFF Membership by asv108 · · Score: 2

      Although I shouldn't even validate such miserably poor post with a response, I will make an exception here. I happen to be a gun owner, and someone who believes that citizens should be allowed to own firearms, ANY firearm after completing a reasonable amount of training and background checks. You can be pro-gun and anti-nra. One other thing, you can also be pro-gun and not buy in to the bullshit idea that there is a constitutional right to bear arms that still applies in our current time.

    7. Re:EFF Membership by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      This is completely off-topic, but I just have to respond to your post. As someone who does not own a gun, and does not wish to own one either, and who is generally referred to, by individuals such as the one to whom you were replying, as "liberal scum" because I happen to think that obtaining a gun should not be as simple as buying a litre of milk -- although most such individuals assume that this means that I want to "take their guns away", which is complete nonsense -- I have found myself in many discussions with people taking an opposing view, usually gun owners, and I have never before encountered one who has presented themselves with nearly as much intelligence as you have. You, sir, have given me new hope.

      I thank you.

    8. Re:EFF Membership by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the NRA
      counts on having gun-toting hicks send in their $25/year do you think the hicks
      would still pay if they could say they are an NRA member and not pay a dime?
      gee, thanks!! i guess our for fathers were "gun toting hicks" why is it ok to rag on christians, conservatives, and men and women who support thier right to own a gun? but, how do you like it if someone says something about geeks, liberals, or god forbid to even think that a person who is gay could change is to become labeled as being a hate mongering bigot!! and if you think that john ashcroft (attorney general) is a poster boy for christians your nuts!! instead of putting down people who support the NRA why don`t you go read this article: http://www.upi.com/view.cfm?StoryID=30042002-11390 1-6626r
      maybe we should work together before it`s to late. how about it? do you think if this becomes law they are gonna stop trying to play God by monitoring everything you do, where you go, what you buy. or even control what you say or do?

    9. Re:EFF Membership by Fig,+formerly+A.C. · · Score: 1

      I'm really not sure why I am bothering to reply to you. You couldn't comprehend what I was saying in my first post, why would you get the message any better this time around? First off, don't assume that noone would donate anymore- you are making the mistake of believing that everyone else is as stingy as you are. Second, the point of a political organization is to show that large numbers of voters want something, not to bribe senators. Saying that 800 million voters are members of the EFF has a lot of clout to all senators, instead of bribing just a few of them. The EFF will have some overhead costs, that is what the donations are for! So, to sum up, they need my money, but they need my name on their roster more.

      --
      Murphy was an optimist.
    10. Re:EFF Membership by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think Cancer Omega of attrition would disagree on the constitutional right to own arms and so would I. Is "the people" in the ammendment pertaining to the right to bear arms different than "the people" in other ammendments? The point of bearing arms is so you can defend yourself against an oppresive government and I think that still applies today.

  12. please consider civil disobedience by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    everttime something like this happens, everyone calls for us to petition our leaders - however it really bothers me that they never consider the promoting the most obvious alternative - civil disobedience (of copyrights). It is easy to do, hard to get caught, and sends a message loud and clear that people are not going to take it anymore

  13. Actual Text of the Copyright Directive by Lothar+0 · · Score: 3, Informative

    You can't get it off the Google list, but you can get it from their cache of the copyright directive.

    --
    "Anonymous Coward" is for whistleblowers, not unpopular opinions.
    1. Re:Actual Text of the Copyright Directive by DarenN · · Score: 1



      At this point, I would like to point out that the EU Commission has freedoms that the Us leglislators can only dream about. Essentially, they are only constrained by the EU charter of human rights, and 3 treaties (as nice has yet to be ratified).

      There is no constitution of the orgainisation that I've been able to find. they can do what they like!!

      --
      Rational thought is the only true freedom
    2. Re:Actual Text of the Copyright Directive by Peter+Harris · · Score: 2
      At this point, I would like to point out that the EU Commission has freedoms that the Us leglislators can only dream about. Essentially, they are only constrained by the EU charter of human rights, and 3 treaties (as nice has yet to be ratified).

      There is no constitution of the organisation that I've been able to find. they can do what they like!!

      I think the Commission can propose what they like, but the European parliament can tell them to fuck off. I hope.
      --

      -- What do you need?
      -- Gnus. Lots of Gnus.
  14. Equivalents... by Rary · · Score: 3, Interesting
    If you haven't joined the EFF (or the equivalent in your country) , now might be a good time.

    Okay, so anybody care to list some equivalents? I think Electronic Frontier Canada is about the closest we have up here in the frosty north. There's also Electronic Frontiers Australia, and the Global Internet Liberty Coalition. Anyone know any others?

    - This sig for sale or rent...cheap

    --

    "You cannot simultaneously prevent and prepare for war." -- Albert Einstein

    1. Re:Equivalents... by a_n_d_e_r_s · · Score: 3, Informative

      Here are some organisations to join:

      EF Sweden www.efs.se

      EF Norway www.efn.no

      EF Finland www.effi.org

      --
      Just saying it like it are.
    2. Re:Equivalents... by Asic+Eng · · Score: 2

      Well in Germany there is Bundestux. Not exactly the right organization, but it's a political group supporting Linux, so that may be a starting point.

    3. Re:Equivalents... by guinnessnwhiskey · · Score: 1

      Maybe the closest equivalent for Germans might be the FFII.

  15. Question... by FortKnox · · Score: 1, Troll

    ...Should Alan Cox start a fight in all countries, or should he just deal with Linux and let the fights go on with diplomats and politicians?

    Besides, how much power does he have outside the internet? Leave the fights to the popular, not the techies.

    Go up to a non-techie type and ask them about "Alan Cox" (they'll probably giggle for reasons you'll find at score:-1).

    --
    Good quote, too many chars. Seriously, the slashdot 120 char limit sucks!
    1. Re:Question... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Go up to a non-techie type and ask them about "Alan Cox" (they'll probably giggle for reasons you'll find at score:-1).

      Hey, I'm a techie and I still giggle at the name.

  16. So, should we force Europeans to say they are not? by budGibson · · Score: 3, Informative

    Well, after the highly offensive campaign to force Americans to say they were not Americans before they could see the kernel changelog for security issues, should we turn about and do the same to Europeans?

  17. Canceled EFF Membership by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I canceled my EFF membership. I want a group that supports the core liberties of the internet, ones that everyone can rally around. The EFF has become the shrill plaything of a few. Supporting spam, calling anti-spam lists a form of censorship. I've been a long time ACLU member, but the right to spam me on my own nickle does NOT count as free speech.

    Take a look at the articles Timothy has posted here on slashdot. Plenty of them are far far out accusations of censorship, and often factually incorrect. "Censorship" in timothy's world often turns out to be simply a private business refusing to serve a customer rather than the goverment supressing the ability to say something. I have the right to prevent porn, hate speech etc on MY servers, just as they have a right to say whatever they want to me when I walk by them on the street.

    We need to fight the DMCA, holling's bill etc. We need a powerful and effective force then can build a BROAD BASED coalition of people, not just rabid idealoges.

  18. Cox downplayed the risk to Free Software by Telex4 · · Score: 5, Informative
    I attended the mini-conference, and The Register is actually a little off in suggesting that he talked about the threats of the EUCD to Free Software development. His central concerns, shared by Martin Keegan, the director of the Campaign for Digital Rights (http://uk.eurorights.org for those in the UK who want an EFF), were that the EUCD could create a new dark age, where digital rights management could see large amounts of information simply disappearing when the format becomes too old, and that minorities such as disabled people would suffer the most because it would not be profitable for companies to produce software to decode the DRM into a format suitable for them.

    I wrote an article summarising the issues discussed at the talk if anyone's interested here.

    1. Re:Cox downplayed the risk to Free Software by 56ker · · Score: 2

      What's DRM stand for (and yes I have read your article but I still am no closer to finding out)?

    2. Re:Cox downplayed the risk to Free Software by eggstasy · · Score: 1

      Digital Rights Management
      As in THEY manage what YOU can do or not.

    3. Re:Cox downplayed the risk to Free Software by Outland+Traveller · · Score: 1

      Digital Rights Management.

      or..

      "Ode to Greed"

    4. Re:Cox downplayed the risk to Free Software by TheAwfulTruth · · Score: 2

      With THEIR information! If you write a song and you want to protect it shouldn't you be able to? Or not protect it if you don't wan't? Isn't that your descision? Then why the hell is it suddenly not allowed for the other person? If it's their book or their song, or their data, then it's their choice as to how to distribute it.

      DRM does not FORCE people to M their data. It only provides the mechanism to do so if they desire. Views such as yours only come about by people that produce nothing and don't wish to pay for anything. Such a thing will never happen no matter how much you whine about it.

      --
      Contrary to popular belief, coding is not all free blow-jobs and beer. Those things cost MONEY!
    5. Re:Cox downplayed the risk to Free Software by Drakantus · · Score: 1

      If you write a song, and want it "protected", keep it a fscking secret. Don't play it on the radio, don't release it on CD, and don't play it.

      --
      I love going down to the elementary school, watching all the kids jump and shout, but they dont know I'm using blanks.
    6. Re:Cox downplayed the risk to Free Software by Telex4 · · Score: 2

      DRM, and the first time I mention DRM I tell you, if you read more carefully :-)

    7. Re:Cox downplayed the risk to Free Software by hany · · Score: 1
      I agree with you that it is OK to try to protect your own data (music, text, financial information, ...) by (almost) whatever means you are able to use.

      For that reason maybe the best way to protect your data is to encrypt them. It is good, easy and deny no rights of others. Unless you are in for example France, where you are forbidden by law to use effective encryption. But that's problem between french citizens and their government, because that's IMO stupid law.

      Also for same reason (protection of your own data) it is plain wrong to leave your data widely available with uneffective encryption (or no encryption at all) but make encryption cracking (or plainly seeing/hearing/...) illegal. You are denying rights of other people to watch and to think about what they saw (because that's what encryption cracking actualy is :) . I.e. you are denying them to use their own eyes and their own brains to process what you transmited to them by lying your data somewhere and somewhat that it reflects light which is interpreted by eyes, brains, ... of others.

      What I'm trying to say is, that problems should be solved where they are, not "hacked" where they are not and where by that "hacking" you are damaging interests of others.

      Those big media (and you and I and whoever want to protect his data) should better come up with good encryption models than trying to pass laws which bans seeing, hearing and thinking at all.

      --
      hany
  19. Well I think its about time by Minter92 · · Score: 0

    that we stop worrying about what is legal and just worry about doing what is right.

    1. Re:Well I think its about time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Unfortunately, bad things happen to those who do what is right, but illegal.

  20. News for nerds. And that's the problem. by Schlemphfer · · Score: 3, Insightful
    From the article:

    If you haven't joined the EFF (or the equivalent in your country), now might be a good time.

    It's definitely a good idea to join the EFF, and to be active against this kind of thing. But an even more effective action is to let mainstream folks know about this problem. The DMCA and whatnot is as grave a concern for clueless newbies as it is for hardcore geeks.

    The best way to make your voice heard on this matter is to find a way to get the general population knowledgeable about what's going on. As long as this is seen as mainly an activism issue for nerds, we're in trouble.

    --
    I'm generally "Interesting," "Insightful," and even "Funny" here. What the hell happens to me at parties?
  21. Re:interesting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You sir, are one of the least clever trolls ever.

  22. Perspective? by why-is-it · · Score: 2

    This law would be something the left would devise

    How is catering to corporate interests at the expense of the citizens a left-wing trait?

    --
    *** Where are we going? And what's with this handbasket?
  23. Article is WRONG on DMCA exemption for blind by Seth+Finkelstein · · Score: 5, Informative
    The article says:

    The DMCA grants limited permission to circumvent copyright protection in order to make braille copies of eBooks for use by the blind, for example, but the EUCD makes such exceptions optional for member states, so they need not be implemented.
    This is WRONG. There is no such permission in the DMCA. The writer has apparently confused it with a copyright limitation:
    Notwithstanding the provisions of section 106, it is not an infringement of copyright for an authorized entity to reproduce or to distribute copies or phonorecords of a previously published, nondramatic literary work if such copies or phonorecords are reproduced or distributed in specialized formats exclusively for use by blind or other persons with disabilities.
    Disclaimer: I am not a lawyer. I do, how ever, know the DMCA very well, since I've been worried for many years about being sued under the DMCA for my anticensorware work

    Sig: What Happened To The Censorware Project (censorware.org)

    1. Re:Article is WRONG on DMCA exemption for blind by Seth+Finkelstein · · Score: 3, Interesting
      Further on this point, the example of eBooks for use by the blind has been argued specifically as an instance of what's wrong with the DMCA. From EFC/EFF Comments on Canadian "DMCA" (CPDCI) (Sep. 15, 2001):

      Perhaps the most troubling application of the DMCA is the recent criminal prosecution of Russian programmer Dmitry Sklyarov. Sklyarov's employer, a Russian software company known as Elcomsoft, produced and distributed software that can be used to convert digital books from Adobe's eBook format into Adobe's PDF format. In the course of the format conversion, the use restrictions imposed by the eBook format are stripped away. It is undisputed that the Elcomsoft software can be used to facilitate noninfringing uses of eBooks (e.g., fair use excerpting, or to facilitate automated translation into Braille for blind readers). Sklyarov himself was never accused of infringing a copyright, or assisting in the infringing activities of any third party. Nevertheless, for his part in developing the software, U.S. officials arrested him and held him in custody for 3 weeks.[17] He and Elcomsoft were recently indicted by a grand jury in San Jose, California. Based on the indictment, Sklyarov faces a maximum of 25 years in prison and a fine that could exceed $2 million.
      Disclaimer: I am not a lawyer. I do, however, know the DMCA very well, since I've been worried for many years about being sued under the DMCA for my anticensorware work (I should further note that I have talked much more with EFF these days about my particular legal problems, but I shouldn't talk about that here. Do Join EFF!)

      Sig: What Happened To The Censorware Project (censorware.org)

  24. Cool, but what about all the whining ? by CDWert · · Score: 1, Troll

    Well if this passes I have ONE single POSITIVE thing that will come from it.

    All the EuroSlashdotters will have to shut the hell up about there being NO freedom in the USA, "Just look at the DMCA"

    The difference I might add that in some European countries it will be Illegal to speak out against it to ANY extent they want ( Not talking about violent action, talking like that COULD get you in trouble even in the US). Here we can bitch and moan to our hearts content, and actually DO something about it. There, once its law forget it.......

    The DMCA isnt really that bad in itself, I am serious, the problems are simple and 2 fold, 1 its open to interpratation by people (judges) that dont have a clue about IP or technology issues. 2 The way it is being used as a tool of greed. Not one of the damm DMCA letters I've seen would hold a grain of salt. But people are afraid, its not the law its the way its being weilded.

    --
    Sig went tro...aahemmm.....fishing........
    1. Re:Cool, but what about all the whining ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Freedom of speach is valid here to you know.

    2. Re:Cool, but what about all the whining ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The difference I might add that in some European countries it will be Illegal to speak out against it to ANY extent they want ( Not talking about violent action, talking like that COULD get you in trouble even in the US). Here we can bitch and moan to our hearts content, and actually DO something about it. There, once its law forget it.......

      Okay, which European countries are you thinking of?

    3. Re:Cool, but what about all the whining ? by CDWert · · Score: 2

      I do not know where YOU are. That may be true, to some extent, or delusion to some extent.

      Ive got a better one for you and I guarentee my list will be longer.

      Name 1 SINGLE European country, hell even the Balkans, where Absolute Unabridged Freedom of speech is a right that is impeachable by noone ?

      The US is very unique in the extent our freedom of speech extends. In france you cannot wave a Nazi flag, in the US you can in fact hand out KKK literature outside a Grade School. You cannot abvocate in certain countries a overthrow, (by political means, not violence) of the entire system of Govt you have, here in the US you can. I could go on for an hour.

      Some european countries are VERY liberal and areas of there freedom of speech may extend past what people percive as limits here in the US. But the truth is, and it has been tested time and time again. Freedom of Speech is an ABSOLUTE right in the US. I dare you to show me one single country on the planet that the free speech extends to the lengths it does in the United States.

      Show me one single example , I would LOVE to be proved wrong, (there are only 2 other countries in the world thats laws support Freedom of Speech to the degree it extends here in the US)

      Is it Illegal to Say ANYTHING you want about ANY subject in your country, to publicize and distribute information on even Illegal activities ?

      Its legal here.

      Overthrow of Goverment BY VIOLENT Means is the one exception. It is in the other 2 examples I know of as well, just like crying fire in a building will get your ass hauled in.

      --
      Sig went tro...aahemmm.....fishing........
    4. Re:Cool, but what about all the whining ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There are other examples of speech that is not protected by the 1st amendment. For example, judges have fairly consistently ruled that "fightin' words" do not enjoy 1st amendment protections.

    5. Re:Cool, but what about all the whining ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Have you ever contributed money to, or held an office in an organization dedicated to the violent overthrow of the United States Government, knowing that the organization engaged in such activites, and in an effort to further those activities?

    6. Re:Cool, but what about all the whining ? by eggstasy · · Score: 2, Informative

      Uh, Portugal?
      I live here and aside from libel and slander and those things that are forbidden in the US as well, we can do whatever we want.

      We actually have a legitimate nazi party. They dont call themselves like that of course (they're the Nationalist Renovator Party), but we know very well what they are.They dont get any votes though :)

      Actually you have a VERY wrong idea of free speech in the EU. What are you basing your euro-prejudice on anyway? Are you a lawyer?
      IANAL but my cousin was a well respected attorney (he just retired), and lives on the floor below me.I'd wager it's all a bunch of hear-say and if you really want I could ask him about the free speech laws in various european countries.

      All the dictatorships have long been dissolved here. There is no Hitler, Mussolini, Franco or Salazar anymore.They've been dead for ages.

    7. Re:Cool, but what about all the whining ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      *sigh*

      Try whispering the world "bomb" or "jihad" while standing in a crowded airport, and see how long it takes to get hauled off and strip searched. I predict about 5 minutes, myself.

      Try asking a female police officer in New York if she would be willing to have sex with you for money, and see how long it takes for your speech to get you arrested.

      In the State of Oklahoma, it used to be illegal for an unmarried couple to have sex. As of about five years ago, it was mostly unenforced, but was under protest because it was being selectively enforced to prosecute homosexuals (who, of course, can't marry).

      And as for your claims that the US has a longstanding tradition of respecting freedom of expression -- look up the word 'McCarthy' in your history books, and see if speech by so-called "communists" was is still "free", or whether it had to be justified to government committees.

      Speech in the U.S. can also be limited by agencies who's job it is to ensure "national security".

      The U.S., like any other country, doesn't guarantee any absolute freedoms on speech and expression -- it's just national conceit to consider otherwise. Different nations have different laws, and they support different cultural values and ideals.

      Chest-thumping, "the U.S. is the only free place in the world" type speeches get tedious to the rest of us -- other countries may have struck a different balance as to which forms of speech are acceptable, but that's not to say that they're more, or less "free" that the U.S.

    8. Re:Cool, but what about all the whining ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I can tell you about one place where Freedom of Speech is severely limited; Sweden.

      Most Swedish people don't really perceive it that way, but unfortunately it is true. There are laws; codified and moral, that regulate what one is allowed to say and in what fashion.

      For example, "Hets mot folkgrupp" is a charge one can have brought against oneself if one utters something perceived as derogatory or bad about a group of people. Thought you are allowed to say that women are bad drivers? Regardless of how much truth is involved with that kind of statement, scientifically backed up by statistics or whatever, you may actually be criminally indicted for slander. All it takes is that you say that men are dogs. If a person with male genitalia identifies himself among the group of "men", he may call the cops on you. This law was enacted to protect minority groups against racism and other hostilities against them. But the law is bullshit.

      There is also a law called PUL, or "Personupplysningslagen". This law effectively prohibits information about people being available publically. You can't even mention somebody's name on a website unless you have express written permission to do so. Non-compliance may result in criminal charges.

      The Swedish people also have a moral law called "Jantelagen", which dictates that as an individual you have a certain place in society. Do not extend yourself, for somebody else may occupy that place. You must be a nobody and comply with what Big Brother tells you.

      Sweden also has no real democracy. Established parties actively try to ban and make outcasts of nationalistic movements. Something that has arisen because the people is taxed to oblivion; much of which goes to immigration of foreign nationals that bring nothing to the country but crime and pestilence. This is of course not a sweeping statement. There are people that migrate to Sweden and actually do something with themselves. But the rest of the immigrants become dependent on society to take care of them. A Swedish politician; actually the immigration minister (Mona Sahlin), has been quoted to say "We need more mosques in Sweden, because those poor muslims are forced to pray in basements and living rooms." The aforementioned houses of prayer, which bear no significance to native Swedes, will of course be funded with tax payers money.

      Sweden is, very much like Belgium, a socialist country that has problems. Some very serious and unfortunate developments in the Danish political system brought about ultra-nationalists in the parliament. The problem isn't that the people are being represented; that's proper, but the fact of the matter is that it affects the elections all over Europe. France for example. Instead of having a moderate and sound view on immigration and Free Speech, countries like these tax their citizens rights so far that people look for answers to the far right extreme.

      No my friends, the United States of America is still and will always be, the best country on Earth! This is of course not suggesting that there aren't problems in this country. But at least you're reasonably free compared to many other countries.

    9. Re:Cool, but what about all the whining ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Absolute Unabridged Freedom of speech: I thought the US had libel laws. Then there's that nifty little thing with copyright the scientologists have going on. That isn't free speech.

      Also, and I'm sure I must have said this before, having a freedom or a right should confer some responsibility to use it wisely, don't you think?

      I'm not saying britain is perfect (govt seems to have a policy of making everything secret until proven necessary for public domain) but I very much doubt any country has this hallowed Absolute Unabridged Freedom of speech, for everyone at least.

      Finally, I am curious. Was the irony of responding with a comment about delusions before diving into a monologue on Absolute Unabridged Freedom of speech, something which has never to my knowledge been the basis of any system, intentional (if so, my bad) or not?

    10. Re:Cool, but what about all the whining ? by CantGetAUserName · · Score: 1

      Can you answer me some questions then?

      (for real, this isn't a troll, data may be old or just plain wrong)

      Do US Immigration require immigrants to state specifically that they are not members of a communist organisation?

      Have they ever done?

      Do US Immigration discriminate against mormons (I think?)?

      Have they ever done?

      If this is wrong, I'm sorry for wasting your time, but I hope you can agree that both are recognised expressions of political \ religious free speech. God that sentance sounds lame - you get the idea, anyhow. I'm pretty sure I have a superfluous question mark in there, too.

      --
      Semper en excreta sumus solum profundum
    11. Re:Cool, but what about all the whining ? by CDWert · · Score: 2

      Yes you will get hauled away, no charges will be filed, im sure after theyve checked your rectum with a commercial grade endoscope but, as long as youdidnt do it to frighten or incite panic, you will walk away.

      The second example isnt a speech issue, you are breaking the law, ask the cop for some drugs same thing, prostitution is illegal , NOW that said you can print books on how to find a secure sex for money, or even make drugs, THAT is protected.

      The truth is McCarthy had no real powers, they would haul you up, possibly deport if you werent a citizen, and basically you got blackballed by mob mentality, you broke no laws you werent PROSECUTED, persecuted is a different story. I personally know 2 people who were brought in front of his hearings, 1 was dismissed as an eccentric (VERY TRUE) the other was "watched" until the 1980's but having a copy of Pravda sent to your house in the cold war might have looked a little suspicios. But neither broke laws and neither was prosecuted. They were pariahs, just like the KKK and Neo Nazi's are today, ster clear and dont associate, BUT that is a choice of the people not to associate with them.

      My discussion of the laws and the Goverment, what I envision as wrong and how to change it CANNOT be limited even by the so called "agencies who's job it is to ensure "national security""

      Chest-thumping.......lol.....Since the DMCA was passed thats all ive heard from the Europeans, a sort of look we can delude ourselves to think we have as much or more freedoms as you.

      I have intimate knowledge of classified weapons systems, some may be declassified by now I am sure. I have a background in nuclear physics as well. Can I tell some dipshit terrorist about these things, no. But the information was passed to me in a secure manner, with the understanding it was secured.

      NOW If I were the person that came up with those ideas outside of a goverment situation, I could publish, I could pass out flyers telling how to make an ION Path discarge weapon. No one would care, but I could do it. AND be protected in such.

      There are a lot of unenforcable laws on the books in every country, you were reffering to a sex law. I am reffering to words that come out of someones mouth or are written on paper. Sex has nothing to do with speech. But in the US you still talk about doing those things without fear of prosecution, look at that NAMBLA thingy , homosexual sex with boys, sickening to me. But they publish guides on it FCOL, and guess what its legal, Im glad it is, (im also glad what they are doing is still illegal here and if they get caught theyll hang so to say) BUT To ensure my freedom of speech continues I must allow others to voice their opinions on anything they wish.

      Much of europe bans Nazi literature, even for historic purposes. Certain political parties are OUTLAWED. A man can be imprisioned for lible in some, and votes in others arent closed. This sound free to you ?

      Write a paper detailing all the things wrong with YOUR current goverment, make it racy, not violent but turbulent. Publish 5000 copies and pass them out around the EU, see how far you get.

      --
      Sig went tro...aahemmm.....fishing........
    12. Re:Cool, but what about all the whining ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes:
      No. Yes. No. No.

    13. Re:Cool, but what about all the whining ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Freedom of Speech an absolute right in the US?

      Try talking about something sensitive, like terrorism. Or maybe about circumventing a copyright protection. That's right.

      "But it's the law!". It makes no difference. You don't have freedom of speech, as the laws passed by the ones who control the USA (the companies) take it away from you.

    14. Re:Cool, but what about all the whining ? by Dehumanizer · · Score: 1

      What, you mean the Popular Party isn't the nazi party here? :)

      --
      The Tlog - a technology blog
    15. Re:Cool, but what about all the whining ? by CDWert · · Score: 2

      Immigration ???

      Who cares. If you are not a US citizen you do not enjoy the rigths guarenteed by our constitiution. This is a very simple fact that has been proven time and time again. If you are a citizen no one could care less if you were a communist, or a mormon, but hell people just hate the mormons naturally, Im not exactly sure why but they do.

      And hell 200 years ago we were hanging wiches. So what

      50 years ago the Nazi were with the aid of their collaborators commiting genocide.

      Do the germans allow nazi materials to be handed out ? Or the french or belgians for that matter ?

      That dosent sound like free speech AT ALL.

      --
      Sig went tro...aahemmm.....fishing........
    16. Re:Cool, but what about all the whining ? by CantGetAUserName · · Score: 1

      My point was that making somebody's political views part of your criteria for immigration sucks, basically. Or religious. It means you can stop free speech by stopping inconvenient ideas at your border and do it even more quietly than outright banning them.

      I am really not certain what the hanging witches and nazi comments are about. You seem to be saying "times change, deal with it!" but I'm not sure how that relates. If you are suggesting that european governments are hypocritical, you won't get any argument from me, but I every government I can think of is.

      --
      Semper en excreta sumus solum profundum
    17. Re:Cool, but what about all the whining ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So if we assume that everything you say is true, none of it in any way supports the claim that once the EUCD is in force you will be able to be arrested just for complaining about it. So again, which countries is this suppose to be true of?

    18. Re:Cool, but what about all the whining ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      OK so i'm replying to the troll, shoot me.

      In case you hadn't noticed, the DMCA has been used to prevent free speech (e.g. xenu.net anti-scientology fiasco?) in the USA.

      In Europe, you could appeal against court rulings that deny you free speech or democratic rights in the European Court of Human Rights.

      And I don't see why this is a bitch fight now between Europe and the US. Europeans are well aware that there is a chance of DMCA equivalents coming into force here, and I know would be perfectly willing to fight against the US version if there was anything that could be done.

    19. Re:Cool, but what about all the whining ? by eggstasy · · Score: 1

      Nope! PP = Partido do Paneleiro
      (O Paulo Portas hehehe)

  25. This democracy thing... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    This democracy thing isn't working... If people were intelligent and understood computers they would not support this... but because people purchase all this crap from corporatations, it is assumed that this is what they (the majority)want, so corporations lobby for it, but little does the comsumer realize that the stuff they are buying is supporting the demise of the freedom that has brought everything they use and buy.

    1. Re:This democracy thing... by tftp · · Score: 2
      This democracy thing isn't working...

      "This democracy thing" is actually working. But it works not like you want it to work; instead, it works as it should, and as designed:

      "Democracy: a form of government in which the supreme power is retained and directly exercised by the people."

      This is not a monarchy where ONE enlightened guy rules the country. This is not a dictatorship when ONE insane guy rules the country. The aggregate of all people rules the country, and representatives of the people form the legislature.

      The problem here is that an average citizen of any country has no clue about pretty much anything. But the fool has the voting right! And he uses it left and right not knowing what he is doing, like a neanderthal toying with a nuclear bomb. Since the voting public is so stupid, political machinators nudge it as they need to produce laws they want.

      So basically "democracy works, but I don't like the results it produces" would be more correct. The humanity already produced hundreds of real or imaginary societies that were ruled differently; most of them failed to survive. So far, the democracy wins in survival game - but nobody ever said that survival of the fittest equals survival of the smartest!

      If things progress further as they are now, expect the reality of "Total Recall: 2070". The society will become an amorphous mush of mindless people, who still are permitted to vote but to no use anyway, and companies rule the world. Alligators survived everyone else, but they are dumb as a brick. Archimedes was smart, and he was killed; Socrates was smart and he was killed. Intellect is bad for survival; illiterate peasants are good. That's where the world is moving to.

    2. Re:This democracy thing... by malkavian · · Score: 2

      What democracy? Far as I can see, things are heading towards a corporate feudalism.
      Corporations, of course, occupying the positions of the local lords, and the local government taking the position of monarch, dispensing laws.
      The 'lords' were the concentration of the power and the wealth, quite capable of toppling a monarch by subtle intrigue, which is why most courts of old had to carfully give the 'lords' lots of what they required, to placate them.
      The same is true of corporations now, with their campaign donations, and media slant/purchasing.
      The common consumer now takes the role of the ancient 'peasant'. They work hard to get their subsistance, and a little more to keep them happy.
      The earnings are given mainly to the 'lords' (currently corporations), who report what they want the monarch (govenment) to hear (via lobby groups, lawyers etc). Then they threaten to withdraw support of actions they want aren't taken.
      Most monarchs (political parties) will capitulate to hold onto the power. If they don't, well, the next one will likely be more malleable. Removing the current one is no problem for the 'lords'.
      Currently, it seems that a vote is an illusion. No matter who you vote for, a consumate bought and paid for politician is who you get, and the 'power behind the throne' still stays the same.
      A democracy presupposes that everyone is informed about all the issues, and that their votes count. Currently, people get one vote every few years, and then just about no say for the next several years. Not only that, but much of the time, actually finding out what the issues are ahead of time is hard to do.. Much like the planning permission for Arthur Dent's house in Hitch Hikers Guide to the Galaxy. It was in a disused basement in a locked cabinet, and both stairs and light were out, and there was a sign saying beware of the leopard.
      And if we don't reply, it's then assumed that we don't object. Just like the peasantry of the Feudal system. Given enough to be kept 'content', and then kept in the dark about most things of real importance, with the "what the don't know won't hurt us" stance.
      Democracy's a great thing. I just wish we had one in the first place.

      Malk

    3. Re:This democracy thing... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Democracy's a great thing. I just wish we had one in the first place.

      I liked your writing but what makes you think democracy is a "great" thing? What's so good about it anyway (if in case it did exist)? I think that's just something we've been brainwashed with since kindergarden. I mean I hate when I do not get the way I want it and I equally hate to force my way upon someone who want something else. And that's exactly what Democracy is about. You might say that democracy is good if everyone wants the same thing but then it's not democracy, it's a polished anarchy ~ everyone does what they want, which I think is the way most of us would like to have it.

    4. Re:This democracy thing... by mpe · · Score: 2

      A democracy presupposes that everyone is informed about all the issues, and that their votes count. Currently, people get one vote every few years, and then just about no say for the next several years.

      It also assumes a candidate being available to represent every possible issue. (Which is especially a problem in places like the US, where things are dominated by a tiny number of political parties).

      Not only that, but much of the time, actually finding out what the issues are ahead of time is hard to do.

      It's not unknown for political parties to claim they will do A, but actually do B . Or simply procrastinate on doing A, without actually doing anything. Let alone using outright "doublespeak".

  26. We all have to ask ourselves ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What would Brian Boitano do?

  27. Don't use DVD/MPG2/PDF/eBooks/etc., then! by mbogosian · · Score: 2, Insightful

    From the article:

    If it goes through unmodified, the EUCD would make it a criminal offence to break or attempt to break the copy protection or Digital Rights Management systems on digital content such as music, software or eBooks. As it stands, the EUCD may lead to a rerun of Dmitri Sklyarov's prosecution, prevent teachers copying materials for their students or other legitimate uses of copyright material, opponents believe.

    ...

    Since it is illegal to circumvent copyright protection, developers would be forced to sign licenses with the creators of a format in order to develop playback tools. This means that a creator could control the market, Cox warned, creating antitrust concerns.

    It never ceases to amaze me how companies who claim to be technology companies, or corporations who adopt technological representations of their media cry when all of a sudden they have to deal with a new set of rules that comes with the new medium. If you're unprepared to deal with the ramifications of the technology, then don't invent/publish/distribute using it. Period. End of story.

    If you're concerned about copy protection, invent something that works. If you don't have the resources to do that, then investigate new paradigms of reimbursement. The fact that corporations are lobbying for regulation this strict is a clear admission of failure on their part to be smart enough to add value to a huge demand already presented by end consumers.

    Thank God for the almighty dollar!

    In the end, I hope OpenSource technologies and licenses will be continue to be developed, published and used by individuals. If it is prohibitive to use a particular proprietary file format, then we as consumers should demand that it shouldn't be used, and alternatives be made available instead.

    1. Re:Don't use DVD/MPG2/PDF/eBooks/etc., then! by Zeinfeld · · Score: 2
      It never ceases to amaze me how companies who claim to be technology companies, or corporations who adopt technological representations of their media cry when all of a sudden they have to deal with a new set of rules that comes with the new medium. If you're unprepared to deal with the ramifications of the technology, then don't invent/publish/distribute using it. Period. End of story.

      Fortunately corporate lickspittle like the above poster don't have very much influence in the EU. The abuse of copyright and patent protections to establish and maintain monopolies has been prosecuted repeatedly.

      In particular the DVD companies are about to get their ass handed to them for the use of the DVD zone encoding for illegal price manipulation. If the case sticks (it should) the studios stand to receive fines of tens of billions of dollars each. And don't think foreign courts can't enforce judegments on a US company, they can, if necessary sequestering the copyrights of the company.

      Thank God for the almighty dollar!

      The question at issue is the almighty Euro which is not as effectatious when it comes to bribing politicians. Unlike in the US European politicians do not collect funds directly for their personal campaigns. So there is no Senator for Disney (Hollings) or Novell (Hatch). Archers Daniels Midland does not get off anti-trust investigations by purchasing the majority leader (Dole).

      There are cases in which technology has been used to establish a market monopoly. For example Rupert Murdoch controlls the UK satelite broadcast market through control of the ViaCrypt system. Fear that he might be regulated by the EU is the reason the Murdoch press is anti-EU. Murdoch has power because of his newspaper interests however and it is a limited power.

      --
      Looking for an Information Security student project suggestion?
      Try http://dotcrimeManifesto.com/
    2. Re:Don't use DVD/MPG2/PDF/eBooks/etc., then! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Unlike in the US European politicians do not collect funds directly for their personal campaigns.

      Not legally, anyways..."

    3. Re:Don't use DVD/MPG2/PDF/eBooks/etc., then! by JCCyC · · Score: 1

      In particular the DVD companies are about to get their ass handed to them for the use of the DVD zone encoding for illegal price manipulation. If the case sticks (it should) the studios stand to receive fines of tens of billions of dollars each. And don't think foreign courts can't enforce judegments on a US company, they can, if necessary sequestering the copyrights of the company.

      Any sources about that one??? I so wish that were true! ;)

    4. Re:Don't use DVD/MPG2/PDF/eBooks/etc., then! by mpe · · Score: 2

      It never ceases to amaze me how companies who claim to be technology companies, or corporations who adopt technological representations of their media cry when all of a sudden they have to deal with a new set of rules that comes with the new medium.

      It's known as "having their cake and eatinig it", publishers want easy to duplicate and distribute media. Since they keep their costs down and boost their profits. Especially if they can persuade the customer to pay more for the new media at the same time.
      However this can also make unauthorised duplication trivial. So the response appears to be to "supercriminilise" copyright infringment, whereas the only really effective method is to render "piracy" uneconomic. Which would mean cutting profits.

      The fact that corporations are lobbying for regulation this strict is a clear admission of failure on their part to be smart enough to add value to a huge demand already presented by end consumers.

      Let alone that in a capitalist system it isn't the government's job to protect even the existance of specific commercial entities.

    5. Re:Don't use DVD/MPG2/PDF/eBooks/etc., then! by yason · · Score: 1
      The question at issue is the almighty Euro which is not as effectatious when it comes to bribing politicians. Unlike in the US European politicians do not collect funds directly for their personal campaigns.

      Yeah, European politicians are genuinely stupid and will pass stupid directives even without bribes :-)

      - A pissed European.

  28. quote was from summary by Schlemphfer · · Score: 1

    Oops...I meant to say "From the summary:" not "From the article:"

    To quote Cher (and with luck, to never quote her again), "If I could turn back time..."

    --
    I'm generally "Interesting," "Insightful," and even "Funny" here. What the hell happens to me at parties?
  29. The UK Campaign for Digital Rights by An+Audience+of+One · · Score: 5, Informative
    The conference that Alan Cox spoke at yesterday was organised by the Campaign for Digital Rights - we are trying to do something about this, and other similar laws. Anyone in the UK, or Europe in general, who wants to help fight this, should consider at least signing up to our mailing list.

    http://uk.eurorights.org/

    We have about 6 months before the EUCD becomes law in this country to try and mitigate it as miuch as possible, and try and stop all the massive loopholes that the media industry is going to exploit in it. Any help we can get is alway appreciated!

  30. Minor US-centric nit by swordgeek · · Score: 1

    OK Chris, the bill is the European Union Copyright Directive. You got that right. It can be (and has been) abbreviated as the EUCD. Do you HAVE to dumb-down the article and call it the European DMCA?
    It's not the European DMCA, it's the EUCD. It's a different bill with similar aims. I'm sure the /. readers can understand that. Why can't you?

    --

    "People who do stupid things with hazardous materials often die." -- Jim Davidson on alt.folklore.urban
    1. Re:Minor US-centric nit by MrResistor · · Score: 2
      I'm sure the /. readers can understand that.

      Kind of presumptive, don't you think?

      --
      Under capitalism man exploits man. Under communism it's the other way around.
    2. Re:Minor US-centric nit by swordgeek · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I admit it--I was being hopelessly optimistic. It's a flaw of mine. :-)

      Most people can. Most people are actually quite smart, if you refuse to let them get away with being dumb. Unfortunately, we live in a society (world-wide as far as I can tell) that thrives on people being stupid, and acting stupid.

      --

      "People who do stupid things with hazardous materials often die." -- Jim Davidson on alt.folklore.urban
  31. Re:First Anal Cox Post! by FortKnox · · Score: 0, Troll

    Isn't that an offshoot of Logged-in Anonymous Bunch of Internet Abusers (LABIA)?

    --
    Good quote, too many chars. Seriously, the slashdot 120 char limit sucks!
  32. Europeans vs. Americans by chaoticset · · Score: 1
    Finally, something Americans can be just a little proud of. "We're not as speech-restrictive as those European countries!"

    Remember that the next time someone looks down their nose at you for being an American. *eye roll*

    --

    -----------------------
    You are what you think.
    1. Re:Europeans vs. Americans by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, but americans want to be the best at everything, so they'll introduce a bill that is even more restrictive.. oh wait, they already did (SSSCA/CBDTPA)

    2. Re:Europeans vs. Americans by t_allardyce · · Score: 2, Informative

      I know you were probably joking, but just in case..

      The DMCA came to America first, and hasn't even got to europe (yet). Secondly, you have your own problems, ie the SSSCA. Lastly, you are much to low on the UN Human Freedom Index to be giving europe crap about free-speech.

      --
      This comment does not represent the views or opinions of the user.
    3. Re:Europeans vs. Americans by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And it's already dead. But the euros will pick it up and pas it in no time!

  33. Boo hoo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Cry you babies and then keep on surfing. I think that most of the idiots (see any post above or below) put down a basic "This is wrong" argument and then keep clicking to forget. It makes me tired. Maybe just tired of all the bullshit that keeps happening because so few actually do anything and so many just pander to the crowd. So cry you bitch, but I know they aren't real tears and I won't count on you for help.

    Sir Humped-a-lot

  34. When Cox Attack by iosphere · · Score: 1

    For some reason when I read the title it made me think of one of those cheesy Fox Specials.

  35. very interesting by Bandito · · Score: 1

    I find it very interesting that when all of the DMCA stuff went down in the US, most kernel hackers and other non-US people said, "Ah, stupid Americans. Oh well, we'll keep working outside the US." Alan Cox even went as far as censoring the Changelogs as I'm sure everyone remembers.

    Now, a similar law is popping up elsewhere, and everyone is up in arms. Why is it that the European version of the DMCA is going to stymie open-source development but not the US version?

  36. Answer... by why-is-it · · Score: 2

    ...Should Alan Cox start a fight in all countries, or should he just deal with Linux and let the fights go on with diplomats and politicians?

    It is precisely because the matter was left to the diplomats, policitians, and the large corporate interests that fund political campaings that this directive was passed in the first place!

    Besides, how much power does he have outside the internet? Leave the fights to the popular, not the techies.

    Who did you have in mind to lead the charge? How many people who are "popular" are also sufficiently well informed about the issues and able to speak coherently and intelligently about the issues. Surely the people who attract the public eye have already been co-opted, or at least see this legislation in their own best interests too. For example, I do not imagine that Brittney Spears would ever argue against these sorts of laws. I doubt that she understands the implications - and even if she did, it is in her record company's best interests to make sure that everyone who wants to listen to her music pays for it, and her best interest because a portion of those royalties go to her

    Sure, the average person on the street does not know who Alan Cox is, but amongst those who are technologically aware, he is known and his opinion carries some weight.

    Who do you think would be a better candidate?

    --
    *** Where are we going? And what's with this handbasket?
    1. Re:Answer... by mcfiddish · · Score: 2


      For example, I do not imagine that Brittney Spears would ever argue against these sorts of laws. I doubt that she understands the implications


      I dunno, Britney Spears seems pretty savvy on technical issues.

    2. Re:Answer... by nomadic · · Score: 2

      Sure, the average person on the street does not know who Alan Cox is, but amongst those who are technologically aware, he is known and his opinion carries some weight.

      Uh, in kernel maintenance maybe, but why should I listen to what he says about legal issues?

  37. Haiku Summary by NoMoreNicksLeft · · Score: 2

    Alan Cox fights war
    Against Uber-copyright
    No chance to survive

    1. Re:Haiku Summary by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm glad I'm not the only one who saw that =)

  38. New PBS Show by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Where in the world is Carm^H^H^H^HAlan Cox? doop di doop be bop

  39. endgame: final chapter by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The trap has been set. The stage has been prepared. The audience waits its final few. Let the endgame begin

  40. Ha! by GrammarPhone · · Score: 1, Offtopic
    First Le Pen, now this... Maybe this will put an end to some of the nose-in-the-air U.S. bashing that Europeans have become so fond of in the last decade or two...

    Not that I think the U.S. shouldn't be bashed, and in fact, I agree with lots of the international criticism of U.S. policies. But the fact of the matter is that this sort of insidiousness happens everywhere, so next time some harebrained senator tries to slide through a despicable law in America, don't just snicker and shake your heads at the stupid Americans. Start looking around for the traitors in your own government who would sell you out to the highest bidder. I guarantee you'll find one or two if you look.

    I'd like to help fight this EUCD, but I'm too busy keeping my own government out of my private life. Good luck, Europe. Hope you're more successful fighting this than we Americans were with the DMCA.

  41. Bad example by danro · · Score: 3, Informative

    I mean, a free open standard has worked pretty well for HTML.

    Yes it has... but I worked as a <shame>webdesigner</shame> for a (short) while at the end of the browser wars.
    And let me tall you.
    For the longest time html was a mess! They (the w3c) even canned the 3.0 version and went to 3.2 because things were so confused. And 4.0 and CSS took years before most browsers implemented it in a reasonable way.

    You can still run into issues created by Netscape and Microsoft in the browser wars if you don't watch out...

    But you're right about things turning out ok in the end.
    Html is good, css is ok, the browsers conform better to the DOM every day, and xhtml is a true blessing!
    But it sure was a rough ride!

    --

    "First lesson," Jon said. "Stick them with the pointy end."
  42. Very sad... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sooner or later they will argue that they are fighting the Cybercrime for whatever reason they dislike, supported by big software companies (ie. Microshit) with incredible amounts of money and of course backup from the government.

    This'll leave an 'open door' to *easy* corruption cases (they can buy almost anything, included the air. Microsoft can also sell it, just make the proposal to Mr. Gates, probably he'll like the idea).

    This is the way that governments and companies are outlining world's OS future, they will intimidate everyone everywhere that has an open source mind.

    This is not a paranoid case, just give them some time, and I'll prove it. This future sucks, companies (like MS) & governments should be stopped.

    jc.

  43. References? by why-is-it · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The difference I might add that in some European countries it will be Illegal to speak out against it to ANY extent they want ( Not talking about violent action, talking like that COULD get you in trouble even in the US). Here we can bitch and moan to our hearts content, and actually DO something about it. There, once its law forget it.......

    Some European countries? I don't suppose that you could provide us with some details to back that claim up, could you?

    --
    *** Where are we going? And what's with this handbasket?
  44. Re:A post for a retard! by Gizzmonic · · Score: 1, Offtopic
    Q: Why is Jack in the Box so cheap?

    A: They use the internet!

    --
    (-1, Raw and Uncut is the only way to read)
  45. So where's he going now? by darianx · · Score: 0

    Well, well, well....old Coxy ran off to the UK because he was afraid of the big bad DMCA. So where can he run to now to bad mouth the USA? I suggest China or North Korea, maybe one of those 3rd world countries that have no knowledge of Microsoft (or phone lines).

    1. Re:So where's he going now? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Alan Cox didn't "run off" to the UK because he was afraid of the DCMA -- he lived there, happily married, with his wife, long before it became an issue to discuss security in the U.S. He used to fly to the U.S. to give talks -- now, that's a bad idea.

      He decided to cancel his tours there, quite rightly, because it's just not worth the risk of travel. If it takes six months stranded in a foreign country to get aquitted (Dmitry spent 3 weeks just in jail), that's half a year he could have spent back home with his wife, half a year he could have been kernel hacking, and so on. If he *isn't* aquitted, well, he'll have to spend even longer, in much less comfortable surroundings.

      In his shoes, which would you choose? He's taking the legal advice of his lawyer, who said there was a chance he could get arrested. Personally, I'd stay home, too.

  46. The best part about joining the EFF... by devphil · · Score: 2


    ...is on their web form, when you're filling out the membership information, they don't have a radio-box selection for Mr/Miss/Mrs/Dr/etc. They just have a text field called "Saluation" and you can fill in whatever title you want.

    So I plan to give them my preferred job title of Programmer-at-Arms. If I convince my girlfriend and fellow geek to join, I hope she'll choose something like Dangerous Felon[*] or Dictator For Life.

    [*] Some friends and coworkers went to one of those job fairs where you can fill out "send me free magazines which are vaguely tech-related" cards, which also have fill-in-the-blank Title lines. One of them convinced his supervisor to use Dangerous Felon in the field, and apparently the guy still gets an occasional freebie magazine addressed to Dangerous Felon Joe Public (with Joe Public replaced by his real name).

    --
    You cannot apply a technological solution to a sociological problem. (Edwards' Law)
    1. Re:The best part about joining the EFF... by rgmoore · · Score: 1

      One of the coolest web forms I've ever seen was the one for the United Airlines frequent flyer program. They had a dropdown menu with something like 100 possible titles to choose from, with everything from the standard Mr/Mrs/Dr through less common ones like Swami and Vice Adm all the way up to very rare ones like Prince and Cardinal. Somebody must have had a lot of fun compiling the list of possible titles.

      It might also be amusing to use this as a way of tracking who's sold your address. So when you get a letter addressed to "Lord High Poobah Public" you know that it was real.com that sold your name but when it's addressed to "Darth Public" it was porn.com.

      --

      There's no point in questioning authority if you aren't going to listen to the answers.

    2. Re:The best part about joining the EFF... by devphil · · Score: 2


      If there's a country which is both A) rich enough to have a good internet connection, and B) democratic enough so that the Prince or Swami or Vice Admiral fills out his own web forms when making his own reservations using said internet connection, then I'm moving. :-)

      --
      You cannot apply a technological solution to a sociological problem. (Edwards' Law)
    3. Re:The best part about joining the EFF... by danro · · Score: 1

      Well, I was going to say Sweden,
      but our king spells like cmdrTaco, so he probably doesn't fill out his own forms... ;-)

      --

      "First lesson," Jon said. "Stick them with the pointy end."
    4. Re:The best part about joining the EFF... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I sometimes misspell or alter my name on application forms etc, to try and track where the data goes.

    5. Re:The best part about joining the EFF... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That probably really is the best part. So sad too...

  47. For Germans by j7953 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    There is an online petition, privatkopie.net, that you might want to consider signing. Of course, since online petitions aren't the most effective tool, you'll also want to think about sending a personal letter to your representative.

    --
    Sig (appended to the end of comments I post, 54 chars)
  48. well well well .... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Looks like his highness will have to drop the foolish holier than thou attitude now huh?

  49. subjectively enforced. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The problem as I see it is that laws are subjectively enforced.

    Apparently I have been a criminal since I flew a kite in chicago at age 6. I see kids using motorized scooters below age 16 all the time. Etc Etc Etc.

    If all laws were enforced equally, we the people would realize just how restictive all governments really are and perhaps do something about it. Instead people just ignore the laws they don't agree with, law enforcement included. Just as they did when they tried to outlaw alchol.

  50. What about Canada??? by Digital+Anvil · · Score: 1

    I remember reading sometime ago about the Canadian government working on something similar to the DMCA.
    I was wondering if anyone had more information or could point me in the right direction to find some information.

    --
    Is the pain worth it, just to see defeat in the eyes of your enemy?
  51. Yes you should. by j7953 · · Score: 2

    Yes you should. By the way, I (disclaimer: I am European) don't think Alan not publishing information that might get him into legal trouble in the US was offensive. It probably was more about publicity than about actual legal issues, but offensive? Not really.

    But Europeans often do have that attitude of pointing at the US and wanting to show them how they're not that free any more. Take a look at thefreeworld.net. Now that's offensive.

    Make sure we get to know that we aren't better.

    --
    Sig (appended to the end of comments I post, 54 chars)
  52. Where are the organisations? by mvdwege · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I am very much interested in fighting this legislation. Unfortunately, I can't seem to find an organisation in my home country that seems willing to lead the fight.

    If necessary, I'm willing to put in the work to set something up, or help an existing organisation. If any slashdot reader in the Netherlands knows more or wants to help, just drop me an e-mail. Any readers who already have an organisation running in other countries are free to contact me for help and tips.

    Mart (e-mail on my userpage)
    --
    "I know I will be modded down for this": where's the option '-1, Asking for it'?
  53. Fair use by bbn · · Score: 4, Informative

    The directive is made up of two parts. The first part defines copyright in general, and the second part is the DMCA equalent.

    The directive has a list of exceptions to copyright that each country can optional implement. One of those is the right to copy digital content for private purposes. The country I live in, Denmark, already allows this. It it is the equalent of fair use, except it is spelled clear out in the law.

    The DMCA part is confusing. It is required that the copyright holder makes it possible to copy in the circumstates where those exceptions apply. So in Denmark, the copyright holder needs to make it possible for me to copy the content for private purposes??

    Looks to me like the different interrest groups in EU could not agree on if they wanted freedom or the DMCA nightmare from USA. So they tried to do both, which will not work.

    1. Re:Fair use by greenrd · · Score: 1
      "Possible" yes. It's an open secret that it's already possible to bit-for-bit copy ebooks, DVDs etc. Does it say they have to make it possible for you to legally use your copy?

  54. FreeBSD response to AC's attack by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Unlike Linux; development continues strong with a STABLE release every 4 months.
    And FreeBSD 5.0 is due out in 6 months. Oh, you're right, linux has
    more users. And 95% of them can't program "hello world". What if I
    told you that all the linux guru's are migrating to BSD because linux
    has gained a rep as the newbies UNIX? Would that scare you? How about
    if I told you about FreeBSD's release engineering team or the tight
    organization of the project? Linux is a "throw your shit in the pile"
    OS whereas FreeBSD has clearly defined project goals. Developing a
    complex system requires organization and FreeBSD has that. And since
    FreeBSD is Open Source, I don't see how it can die... You're just
    jealous because KDE isn't installed by default and you can't do
    anything without it. FreeBSD is growing and growing fast my friend!
    -jkh

    1. Re:FreeBSD response to AC's attack by lazy_greenhouse_gas · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Here trollie is this close? eval "echo -e `printf "\x066\x055\x063\x06B \x055"`" The confusion is all yours prick.

    2. Re:FreeBSD response to AC's attack by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Here are some instructions for BSD funs:
      1. Install FreeBSD.
      2. Begin to install packages from ports.
      3. Notice that most of packages require BSD-specific patches to be applied before being compiled.
      4. Notice that most of the same packages are compiled on Linux without any patches.
      5. Make a conlcusion that most of software development is primary going on Linux.
      6. Install linux and forget BSD.
  55. petition by canned+polar+bear · · Score: 2, Informative

    This petition is directed to the European Parliament. Its goal is to warn European Authorities against the dangers of software patents. This petition is supported by the EuroLinux Alliance together with European companies and non-profit associations. http://petition.eurolinux.org/index_html?LANG=en

  56. so Alan... by BigChigger · · Score: 0

    you going to leave Europe if this passes? maybe you shoulnd't be such a smart ass about American politics.

    bc

  57. Re:So, should we force Europeans to say they are n by prizog · · Score: 3, Insightful

    You were free to post the changelog yourself as an American citizen. But you would risk prosecution under the DMCA. So, where's your mirror?

  58. Re:So, should we force Europeans to say they are n by budGibson · · Score: 1

    Actually, it was not fear of the DMCA, but no desire to go to the trouble of hosting a mirror. However, had I obtained the changelog through the publically available site, wouldn't I have had to have lied?

  59. EUCA in 5 words by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I Told you Dumb Mother-Fuckers!

    And you stupid fucks already gave up your guns also! No hunting, no computing, no defending yourselves.. HAHAHAHAHA your all going to be a bunch of LAMBS now. Better practice saying, "BAAA, BAAAA"

  60. Re:So, should we force Europeans to say they are n by prizog · · Score: 2

    No, another European could have reposted it.

  61. Re:So, should we force Europeans to say they are n by budGibson · · Score: 1

    So, basically you have let me off the "moral" hook of having had to repost to prove my courage in the face of the DMCA. I am American, so you do not expect me to lie. Only a non-American (you are very Euro-centric in your response) could have taken the courageous role you propose.

  62. Where is the best place to be? Out or in? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    (Posted anonymously for obvious reasons)

    If you work for a company who relies/supports the DMCA and similar, which is better - resign and get rid of the personal issue, or try and work from within and persuade people of the faults?

    This is a serious question I struggle daily with. In my position, I may have influence, but if I leave, I have none.

    To paraphrase Daneel Olivaw in "caves of steel", is it better to turn Evil into Good, than to just focus on destroying evil?

  63. Re:So, should we force Europeans to say they are n by peddrenth · · Score: 1

    - Anyone in the US who emails me gets a bounced reply saying their message won't be accepted without encryption.
    - Anyone in Britain who emails me gets a bounced reply saying that British Citizens' e-signatures cannot be trusted.
    - Anyone in China, Korea, or Taiwan just gets deleted, period.

    Try it sometime, it'll cut-down on all the crap you get. Until you post the address to slashdot.

  64. UK residents, contact your MP by DirtyDuck · · Score: 2, Informative

    UK residents can contact their MP by first looking them up and then emailing them using this page. It uses a god awful web form but at least you can make your views known.

    I've emailed my MP Paddy Tipping (What a name!)

    As always, be polite but be firm!

    1. Re:UK residents, contact your MP by IamTheRealMike · · Score: 4, Informative
      UK residents can contact their MP by first looking them up and then emailing them

      No, don't do this! Why? Simple, it doesn't work. MPs, as a general rule of thumb, are very busy and therefore pay more attention to messages from their electorate when more effort has been put in. An email, in the mind of an MP, requires zero effort. And they are right. A fax requires a bit more. A letter is the gold standard. Preferably hand written (as long as your writing is neat). Don't simply bash out a 5 minute email, write your MP a letter! It'll have more effect.

      Fax is tempting, but last time I sent a fax to my MP I never got a reply :( This time, I'll write on paper with my hands. They'll pay more attention, and let's face it, the extra effort is worthwhile.

  65. Re:So, should we force Europeans to say they are n by prizog · · Score: 1

    You could have lied -- I don't think it would have been immoral. Or you could have waited until some European reposted it. Your choice. But I don't think you can say that Cox was trying to "force" Americans to lie. He was trying to cover his ass so he could travel to the US in the future w/o fear.

  66. Stay home? His wife's a DAWG by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Hell - stay home. Have you seen his wife? Shit - she's the reason why geeks get a bad rap. Talk about a DAWG. Listen.... yup - that's her barking in the distance.


    Cox's wife is the poster child for why geek-girls are just not attractive compared with a REAL WOMAN.


    Jail...wife....jail....stay home....fly to USA...

  67. Better than the EFF by X-Nc · · Score: 1

    The EFF is a good organization and they do good things but, if you are in the US and want to join an organization that really has an impact on the legislature and has done more than the EFF and all other similar organizations combined, you should check out the US Internet Industry Association. This is the only organization that Congress really listens to.

    --
    --
    If I actually could spell I'd have spelled it right in the first place.
  68. Mayday by t_allardyce · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    The May-day riots are about to start here in London, After reading this story I feel like joining - well, you get free McDonalds (happy meal toys are subject to availability - i.e. who evers first behind the counter when the glass breaks:). Everyone says that you should just watch it on TV 'cos they get the best shots and do re-plays and commentary and stuff, but I think you just can't beat being there, with the atmosphere, smell of blood and cheap spray paint.

    The best part about this new law is, that people who wouldn't normally waste their time cracking some protection system, will now devote _all_ their time just to make a point. Wow, i feel like smashing stuff "Down with the corporate pigs!!!!!!"

    --
    This comment does not represent the views or opinions of the user.
  69. left no more free thinking than the right by liquid_schwartz · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Really most people who are _very_ one way or the other are simple minded. I've not met an intelligent person who was not left wing one one issue yet right wing on another. Both wings support some _really_ stupid idealogy if you look at all of their stances. To cite a point, if the left is so free thinking and open minded, did the California left recently try and ban all .50 caliber rifles? These had never been used in a crime, yet they were saying that this would help the public good. Doesn't sound like a free thinking group to me ;-)

  70. MODERATORS: A PLEA by tps12 · · Score: 2
    Please stop modding this down. Re-read it, note that nothing in it is indefensible, therefore it is not a troll. My karma has suffered enough over this.

    :(

    --

    Karma: Good (despite my invention of the Karma: sig)
    1. Re:MODERATORS: A PLEA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you karma is going down because it should.

      indefensible? how is BSD suffering? do you have proof? you sound like that idiot in the UK years ago who claimed there was no holocaust. stop hyping shit that isn't true

    2. Re:MODERATORS: A PLEA by tps12 · · Score: 1, Offtopic
      indefensible? how is BSD suffering? do you have proof?

      Come on, you can do better than that. First, it was an obvious joking allusion to the "*BSD is dying" troll. Second, relative to Linux, BSD is dead...look at user base, development activity, applications, any meaningful metric, and BSD trails Linux. So what I said (IIRC, "I don't want Linux to go the way of BSD") is completely based in fact and reason.

      you sound like that idiot in the UK years ago who claimed there was no holocaust. stop hyping shit that isn't true

      Fuck you and your neo-Nazi analogy. Read my original post, look up how many innocent people were slaughtered during the Holocaust, think for one fucking second, and then reconsider whether you really want to make that comparison.

      you karma is going down because it should.

      Easy to say for an AC. I'm posting this with my bonus. Plz ks my ass, thx.

      --

      Karma: Good (despite my invention of the Karma: sig)
    3. Re:MODERATORS: A PLEA by Permission+Denied · · Score: 3, Funny
      Dude...what the hell are you doing?

      20:01 Tuesday 30 April 2002
      19:59 Tuesday 30 April 2002
      19:55 Tuesday 30 April 2002
      19:33 Tuesday 30 April 2002
      19:20 Tuesday 30 April 2002
      19:14 Tuesday 30 April 2002
      19:09 Tuesday 30 April 2002
      18:58 Tuesday 30 April 2002
      18:54 Tuesday 30 April 2002
      16:17 Tuesday 30 April 2002
      16:07 Tuesday 30 April 2002
      15:54 Tuesday 30 April 2002
      15:51 Tuesday 30 April 2002
      15:47 Tuesday 30 April 2002
      14:24 Tuesday 30 April 2002
      13:52 Tuesday 30 April 2002
      13:17 Tuesday 30 April 2002
      12:40 Tuesday 30 April 2002
      10:47 Tuesday 30 April 2002
      10:39 Tuesday 30 April 2002
      9:59 Tuesday 30 April 2002
      9:51 Tuesday 30 April 2002
      9:31 Tuesday 30 April 2002

      You have done absolutely nothing but post to Slashdot all day. This is a Tuesday for Christ's sake. Slashdot karma should be the least of your worries. Get a job, go to class, do some homework or read a book - you went to Columbia, you won't find sufficient intellectual stimulation reading slashdot all day. Seriously, turn off the computer. If there's something wrong, you're not going to find any answers on slashdot.

    4. Re:MODERATORS: A PLEA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Those span 10 hours, so it's about two an hour. Which isn't crazy if you're near a computer all day anyway (I am). It is less time then I spent on smoke breaks two weeks ago before I quit (which might have something to do with my slashdot frequency...). One break requested.

  71. What is the "European DCMA"? by dann0 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Please stop insulting our intellegence by Americanising the issues that appear on Slashdot.

    If I can understand what the European Union Copyright Directive is about, I'm sure that anyone can. It's not like the term is vague and incomprehensible.

    When compared to the DCMA, the issues are similar, but the stakeholders and the implications to them are different.

    I guess that it is only a matter of time before China's long standing censorship practices are simply referred to as the "Chinese DCMA".

    --
    "The big question in our lives is how to be at the same time a hedonist and in a hurry" - Alain Ducasse (?)
  72. computer geeks of the world unite by amibrauer · · Score: 1

    Well it looks like the MPAA and the government are succeeding in enslaving the masses doesn't it. Write your congressmen, write your president, prime minister, representative, premier, mayor, hell even your second cousin twice removed (whatever that means anyway) to get the DMCA repealed and region codes illegalized as the trade restriction they are! no more ads you can't fast forward through, no more FBI warnings in countries where the FBI has no jurisdiction anyway and no more inflated prices on the european market. Tell them off for making it illegal to watch encrypted DVDs on Linux too. Down with the DMCA!

  73. What is wrong with you people? by slackergod · · Score: 1

    This isn't just a response to the above post,
    but the ones in this thread, and other ones like it...

    You're caught up in saying "he's left" "he's right" "define left" "define right" "good" "evil", whatever...
    don't get so carried away assigning labels that you miss the point of the act.

    Whatever you decide to label Hollings as (assuming some concensus was reached),
    it won't have any effect on what it is he's actually doing. If he calls himself a Democrat,
    that doesn't mean his actions will by default be "left wing", same if he calls himself a republican.

    Fact is, that's why bills like his have a chance. Government isn't a simple single-axis thing.
    Just because something is or isn't left-wing doesn't mean it's ring wing, or center or whatever.
    (I'd call attention to US History... the meanings of the labels Democrat and Republican has literally reversed meaning a number of times).

    There can be, for instance, acts of total absorbed self-interest.

    The SSSCA, whatever, benefits only a section of businesses.

    Let me take two extremes. Call them what you will.
    One side is pro-individual freedom over government.
    They think the government should butt out where it isn't invited.
    To these people, I say... the SSSCA DMCA, etc, should frighten you to your very soul...
    this is the government beginning to say what you can read, think, do.

    Then there's the other extreme, which thinks the government should be there
    to help people, protect and support them from their own follies and from each other.
    To them, I say... the SSSCA DMCA, etc, is an attempt to subvert the government so that the interests of the few (RIAA, etc)
    are enforced upon everyone, to the deteriment of many and the benefit of few.

    Who cares which side is which? Both viewpoints are in the end just methods of analysis,
    points from which you are viewing a topic, not separate spectral ends of the range of responses
    .
    IMNSHO, (In my not so humble opinion) a good Representative Government isn't about the will of the majority or a minority.
    Nor is it about their best interests. It's about the best interests of the WHOLE. The majority and the minority.
    That is, all the people to whom the law is applied. (No Taxation w/o Representation and all)

    From this viewpoint, a law is bad when it damages the whole of the people, no matter how few or how many it may protect or help.

    The *CA, whatever copyright interests they may protect, serve to diminish the
    creative drive of all the people, howsoever subtly or slowly:
    Say I sat down, and had a thought. To me, it might be revolutionary.
    Say it was some kind of algorithm. Maybe someelse has patented it,
    so I can't commercially profit from it.
    The intent of these laws is to deny me the freedom to even use this algorithm
    ONLY ON MY OWN COMPUTER, ONLY FOR ME. An algorithm like, say, a non-drm OS :)

    Just because we can only think of one thing to fix a problem, doesn't mean it should be done:

    Cutting off the arm to cure gangrene used to be an acceptable idea.
    Nowdays, we use antibiotics. At the time, it was acceptable: nothing at the time was likely to replace it within the (short) expected life-span of the patient.

    But laws are different. They endure, (at least in the US) long past the time they have been forgotten,
    long past the time that common sense has moved on, and found a better solution.

    What we set into law now will linger on, and not be so easy to tear down.
    It's force will remain, even when other options exist. And the nature of the *CA laws is such that they will themselves prevent
    any such options from ever seeing the light of day, mutally exclusive memes, much as the ideas open-source- and drm- OSes.

    Whew. Sorry bout the rant :)

    -Slackergod

  74. Linux is dying by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why bother? Linux is dying out anyways. It's a crappy OS that ignores the last 30 years of OS technology.

  75. The only positive thing about this legislation by Powerdog · · Score: 1

    American /.ers might finally stop hearing the snarky comments from the European /.ers about how enlightened their copyright rules are every time the DMCA is mentioned.

    Our governments are all beholden to corporate greed, it's only a matter of degrees - not orders of magnitude.

  76. Parent uses "humour" by Shade,+The · · Score: 1

    It may be an alien concept to the modders, but I think the parent to this post was meant to be humourous, rather than a troll.

    I thought it was funny anyway :)

    1. Re:Parent uses "humour" by Yoda2 · · Score: 1
      Yes, it was a sarcastic jab at the "typical" American's lack of knowledge of geography and of other cultures in general.

      Bet if I find a way to make fun of the average Slashdot reader's lack of understanding of sarcastic humor I can get a -1!

  77. protest by r0ckflite · · Score: 1
    Hmm, does this mean Alan will be moving out of Europe if this law passes. He said something about not travelling to the U.S. because of our oppressive DMCA law and his fear of being arrested.


    Hmm, maybe you should move to South America, Alan.

    --

    Push the button Max!!!!

  78. Criminal Offence to be BLIND, or try to READ. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And their helpers get roped in as 'accessories'
    So we are saying all the digital media proimised in five or so years, willl not be available/ or prohibitly expensive RELATIVE to offerings available to the normal population.
    And you need permission to try to read - off each and every publisher, and new technological frustrations will be added to blind / disabled folk, that may also be expensive.
    Good one.

  79. Hm, what does Alan want to say? by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

    Th two links to "The Register" don't say much.

    I've read the EUCD several times.

    I realy see no point why that should be bad to you, to me or to open source software.

    It would be nice if one could bring some arguments and foundate them with the articles of that EUCD in question.

    I mean: that braille example for eBooks is rather lame isn't it?

    Why should the EUCD prevent one to translate a work into braille script? I can not see an article in the EUCD preventing that.

    Regards,
    angel'o'sphere

    --
    Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
  80. Re:AN ALAN COXXX FAVORITE OPEN SOURCE COLA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You fucker! You didn't include the disclaimers about the acid and caffeine! I'm fucking disfigured for life now!

  81. Where can I vote *for* DMCA? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Considering the fact that a majority of these anti-patent punks are Euro-commies and total deadbeats, I feel obliged to vote *for* DMCA...

  82. PEOPLE WITH CLUE UNITE! by tracy · · Score: 1

    There should be a general strike of IT workers.
    The producers of information technology are always being oppressed by the luddite consumers of information technology. The irony is that the luddites comfy little status quo fiefdoms largely depend on earlier technology advances. All of humanity is being held back by some crusty old politicians collecting big bucks from crusty old CEOs getting paid big bucks to run corporate behemoths into the ground while crushing individual expression. I think it is about time to stop getting Pimp'd by the luddites.

    Go Here!
    http://www.thelinuxshow.com/otc.htm

  83. The right to read by fidros · · Score: 1

    RMS wrote this in 1997.

    I think it goes to show that no matter how hard headed and inflexible Mr. Stallman may sometime apear to be, the current events are starting to show that the reasons behind that have more to do with his far reaching sight and less with personal character.

    Do we really have to wait for Moon colonies to regain the right to read? :-(

    --
    Gilad.
  84. An expert opinion by Pascal+of+S · · Score: 3, Informative
    According to this publication: Why the Copyright Directive is Unimportant, and Possibly Invalid, dated 2000-something, the directive is not a clear (surpise, surprise) directive *at all*. It basically fails to do what they intended it to do: harmonize copyright law (which is basically a good thing).

    I like the final statement he makes:

    The European Court's decision raises the intriguing prospect of one or more disgruntled Member States challenging the validity of the Copyright Directive. Wouldn't that be the perfect way of getting rid of this monstrosity? I hereby offer my services to any Member State pro bono.
    I would love to take him up on that, except I'm not a member state, just a citizen.
  85. Damn.. by Chicane-UK · · Score: 1

    And I thought we were going to get out of these stupid laws in Europe.. and then they go and propose it.

    The thing that frustrates the most, is that the people who try and introduce the bill obviously have no interest in the technologies that laws like this affect - so why on earth do they get involved? *cough* cash bribes *cough*.

    B*stards.

    --
    "Hey! Unless this is a nude love-in, get the hell off my property!!"
  86. Cox has no credibility... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    After Alan Cox's FUD about the DMCA barring him from listing security fixes in changelogs (which would only be true if Linux had built-in copy protection mechanisms), he no longer has much credibility on this issue. So is he telling the truth about the scope and impact of this bill, or is it just more AC FUD?

  87. Audio from Talk by thick_sliced · · Score: 3, Informative
    You can listen to the audio of the talk:

    http://www.odl.qmul.ac.uk/eucd/

  88. So... what can I do? by Pflipp · · Score: 2

    I'm Dutch. I never could protest the DMCA because it was American, and I have no saying in what Americans do with their country, of course.

    Now the DMCA comes to my country and it seems like there's no organized protest beyond Britain. Please point me to any organisation that bundles individual efforts of this matter and supports my country in that...

    --
    "We can confirm that Debian does *not* ship the version with the trojan horse. Our version predates it." [CA-2002-28]
  89. Alan Cox and the EU-DMCA by Vintermann · · Score: 1

    Well, it's a nice thing that he calls on us to react, but he personally probably carries as much clout as all of us together. We can be conveniently ignored, painted by copyright lobbyists as fringe elements and pirates. Alan Cox himself is another matter. He's too famous, even outsiders will have heard of him. The kind of people who appear on the front of Time can't just be ignored...

    --
    xkcd is not in the sudoers file. This incident will be reported.
  90. let the parliament know what you think by skotty · · Score: 1

    It's nice to discuss this subject on slashdot. It's very nice if you support the EFF... but there's something else you can do if you're from europe: your country has representatitves in the European Parliament. Let them know what you think! Their job is to represent you and they can only do this if they know what you think.

    You can find the members of the European Parliament on http://wwwdb.europarl.eu.int/ep5/owa/p_meps.short_ list Just choose a country and press on search. Most of them don''t have an emailaddress so you have to search a bit with google to get it. There are also some lists on the internet, for example here but they are not always complete and up to date.

    If you're from belgium: i've got an almost complete list on http://dries.ulyssis.org/eucd/belgium.html

  91. Last one. Again! by The+Last+Post · · Score: 1

    Post 223.

    No, there is no 224.

    Bow down before my lost prasting skillz!