Is the problem solved? I should recompile the GIMP and other GTK based programs whenever newer version of GTK/GLIB came out.
There are some inconvenience with GTK. 1. The different so name. 2. higher versions of GTK/GLIB can't embrace lower versions. ( no compatibility, not at all though. )
I wish someday it will be solved completely.
I think we don't need another language.
on
Microsoft's COOL
·
· Score: 1
Well, we have interest in many platforms. For example, Windows ( to live ), Linux ( !!! ), Mac ( not you? ), etc. And we have interest in many languages, like C/C++, Java, and probably delphi? ( object pascal ? ) and maybe Objective-C. There are too many things to learn.
So, I don't think it's coold to have another language. Instead of COOL, I think there is much more nicer thing. It's HyperTalk-like C++. You know, the HyperTalk is very OOP oriented, and it's very pleasing to write in HyperTalk. What I don't like about it is that it is only for Mac and slow. ( Although it's a little compiler-based nowadays. ) I think it would be coold to have C++ on the base and on top of it, HyperTalk-like objects and C++- like freedom of making user-defined objects. In addition, how about HyperTalk like object management or SmallTalk-one?
Would it be much more nicer? ( And probably we lost our jobs?:) Because programming can be much easier? Well, I really don't think so. Because it's C++, basically. )
Name? Hyper-C++? I tried the Dylan for Windows, but it consumes too much memory, and not easy to learn. ( C++ code looks much clearer. )
Slashdot Mirror
Is the problem solved?
I should recompile the GIMP and other GTK based
programs whenever newer version of GTK/GLIB came
out.
There are some inconvenience with GTK.
1. The different so name.
2. higher versions of GTK/GLIB can't embrace
lower versions. ( no compatibility, not at
all though. )
I wish someday it will be solved completely.
Well, we have interest in many platforms.
:) Because
For example, Windows ( to live ), Linux ( !!! ),
Mac ( not you? ), etc. And we have interest in
many languages, like C/C++, Java, and probably
delphi? ( object pascal ? ) and maybe Objective-C.
There are too many things to learn.
So, I don't think it's coold to have another
language. Instead of COOL, I think there is much
more nicer thing.
It's HyperTalk-like C++. You know, the HyperTalk
is very OOP oriented, and it's very pleasing to
write in HyperTalk. What I don't like about it is
that it is only for Mac and slow. ( Although it's
a little compiler-based nowadays. )
I think it would be coold to have C++ on the base
and on top of it, HyperTalk-like objects and C++-
like freedom of making user-defined objects.
In addition, how about HyperTalk like object
management or SmallTalk-one?
Would it be much more nicer?
( And probably we lost our jobs?
programming can be much easier? Well, I really
don't think so. Because it's C++, basically. )
Name? Hyper-C++?
I tried the Dylan for Windows, but it consumes
too much memory, and not easy to learn.
( C++ code looks much clearer. )
What do you think about it?
:)
But not for the Sorenson Video codec.
Well, there were something peculiar about
the 2.2.1.
Although the intranet can be reached, but
the internet cannot be reached. So, what I
know is that at least my network card works.
Another problem is that X term from the
XFree 3.3.3 ( binary distribution ) doesn't
work. Even my WindowMaker can't invoke any program
using the menu.
I think the 2.2.1 should work correctly but I can't figure out why it can't.
:)