Really? So you've never had a coughing fit. I get them whenever some dust or whatever gets stuck in the back of my throat. It can sometimes take a few minutes to clear it out. So I see nothing surprising about someone who is giving speeches and talking all day long finding themselves coughing on occasion.
Now if she were to appear completely out of breath or otherwise severely impacted by the coughing then maybe you might have a point. However you can watch videos and see she keeps the speech going even while trying to clear her throat.
If someone lost 8000 DVDs they did something wrong. Either buying really cheap media or storing it improperly. I have DVDs that I burned from ten years ago that still work fine. I recently moved a few hundred DVDs over to BluRay for the reduced storage space and only had a few files that I had issues recovering. The rest came across with no problem and that was with a mix of Verbatim (good quality) and Sony (not quite so good quality) media.
All too true. If the record company really wanted the person responsible they would be going to Dropfile and try to get the address of the person who uploaded. That very well could be an employee. The person who posted the link to Reddit could have just read about the song elsewhere and thought it would be great to share the link and have no connection to the company at all.
I would put snails in this category also. I had them once and while they were quite tasty I think it was more the butter/garlic sauce with little contributed other than texture by the snails.
They do have that. It's perhaps not as fine a control as with the joystick but it's a finer control than on/off that you get with most keyboards. It just costs a good deal.
He's a clean cut older white male. That fits in with most of the people showing up at Trump conventions so from that standpoint he looks good on TV. Of course that leaves out a significant portion of the populace but that's never seemed to bother Trump.
It's an easy thing to say but how do you accomplish that. With large metropolitan police forces it is possible to set up an extensive training program that all officers have to go through that helps to teach officers to de-escalate situations and avoid these shootings that happen without good reason. That doesn't do a thing to address the small local police forces that exist in many communities across the country that may have no training program at all.
I wonder about such a transfer does the value come from the internal value to the company or an external value. For instance something might have great value inside the company but be of little value outside the company due to the additional resources required.
That assumes that the people being replaced are capable of doing those jobs. What you fail to take into account is there are many people that aren't capable of doing much more than a basic manual labor job. The perfect sort for a robot to do. What happens to those people when there are no jobs available? In addition there's the question of retraining all of the people that were displaced by the robots since it seems few companies are willing to pay for training new employees.
That doesn't happen now. Youtube changed the policy so that when a complaint is lodged the money goes into a separate bucket and sits there until the complaint is resolved. Once resolved the money goes to whomever wins the complaint so there is no lost revenue.
The only time this doesn't apply is when more than two people/companies are involved. As Jim Sterling found out if you have multiple companies making copyright complaints then no one gets any money as Youtube bows out of the advertising. Guess they don't want to get involved in lawsuits between multiple corporations so they decided if multiple people make a complaint against a video then no one gets any money (not even Youtube.)
That was a common thing back when I last looked at pirated software. Interestingly enough one of those games was Bioshock Infinite. In my case I found the miner due it being poorly written so that it wouldn't run on the ATI 4670 I was using at the time. Once I knew to look for it there was no problem in finding and removing the bitcoin miner and verifying the game worked. Though I never ended up playing the game until after I later picked up a legit copy of the game.
I've been dealing with Comcast caps since 2008. Started at 250GB and then moved to 300GB a while back. At least 1TB is better than 300GB but they will probably stay at 1TB until the FCC does something else that makes Comcast nervous.
Can it work when passing through the Earth? If so then it still has value as a communication technology that won't be blocked by objects in space or the rotation of the Earth.
I can't agree with you if their courts are like ours. He may be asking for 2 million dollars with the full knowledge that it's a starting place and the actual figure will be well below that. It's not like he's been done tremendous harm so there won't be any damages awarded to him outside of this amount so he starts by asking for 2 million knowing he might get a tenth of that.
Perhaps, but Disney is also very much a capitalistic organism and as such very buys into the right wing values of corporations are more valuable than the people that make them up. Much like people Disney is a complicated beast with aspects of both right/left/libertarian.
The problem with slow changing of channels on Comcast with X1 is due to the one changing a channel is tied in to their head end servers. They end up having to communicate with the head end to get the updated info on the new channel and that slows things down instead of just immediately tuning in to the new channel the way it used to be. So you get all the info on what show is airing when you change channels (whether you care or not) at the cost of slower channel changes.
Because this is a test phase. After all they want to be sure that no one can get their service for free. They did say this is a trial so it may eventually become available for everyone, but they still expect most customers will continue to use set-top boxes.
Also take note that the service isn't going to be tied to only people having Comcast as their ISP so they hope to take customers away from other cable companies by allowing them to use their application to watch Comcast TV even though they are using XYZ Internet service. Which is likely to make any ISP that also provides TV service but currently doesn't have a monthly bandwidth usage limit seriously think about starting one to help keep their customers from looking at a service like Comcast is providing.
You would be wrong. Sure, you will encounter racism but it's nothing like it might have been 50 years ago. I see bi-racial couples on a daily basis even though I live in the Deep South and no one says a thing. Some people might be thinking it's awful but they don't say anything publicly.
The only problem with what you've said is that it contradicts what's been reported. From what I've read he made one ruling that could be seen as being against guns and that was only that there wasn't enough evidence prevented to overrule another court and that case was some years ago. So no one knows how he would rule if an actual gun case came before him on the Supreme Court which is one reason to hold hearings where he can be asked about subjects like this.
That's a good way to insure the death of venture capital and IPOs. After all with the current legal environment a shareholder can't legally know what is going on inside the company when deciding what to do with their stock so no one would be foolish enough to take on the liability when they have no say in what happens inside the company (other than the occasional election of officers/board members) and no knowledge of what those people are doing outside of what is public knowledge.
The only way this idea works already exists and that's with a limited set of owners of a company that are involved in the running of said company. So they know what is going on in the company and can directly influence those actions. Shareholders are removed from that direct influence and inside knowledge.
I wouldn't be so sure. Given such a situation there's no reason for them not to hold hearings and vote down the people that Trump nominated. The same applies to President Obama's nominees. If the Senate doesn't like them then hold hearings and vote the nominee down. There's no clearer way of sending a message on what they will not accept, but we know they don't want to put that message out there before an election which is why they are talking about not holding hearings and not casting a vote on this nominee.
Slashdot Mirror
I would say that depends upon the woman.
Really? So you've never had a coughing fit. I get them whenever some dust or whatever gets stuck in the back of my throat. It can sometimes take a few minutes to clear it out. So I see nothing surprising about someone who is giving speeches and talking all day long finding themselves coughing on occasion. Now if she were to appear completely out of breath or otherwise severely impacted by the coughing then maybe you might have a point. However you can watch videos and see she keeps the speech going even while trying to clear her throat.
If someone lost 8000 DVDs they did something wrong. Either buying really cheap media or storing it improperly. I have DVDs that I burned from ten years ago that still work fine. I recently moved a few hundred DVDs over to BluRay for the reduced storage space and only had a few files that I had issues recovering. The rest came across with no problem and that was with a mix of Verbatim (good quality) and Sony (not quite so good quality) media.
All too true. If the record company really wanted the person responsible they would be going to Dropfile and try to get the address of the person who uploaded. That very well could be an employee. The person who posted the link to Reddit could have just read about the song elsewhere and thought it would be great to share the link and have no connection to the company at all.
So you are saying that only a System Administrator is capable of using Linux while anyone can use Linux? Interesting.
I would put snails in this category also. I had them once and while they were quite tasty I think it was more the butter/garlic sauce with little contributed other than texture by the snails.
They do have that. It's perhaps not as fine a control as with the joystick but it's a finer control than on/off that you get with most keyboards. It just costs a good deal.
He's a clean cut older white male. That fits in with most of the people showing up at Trump conventions so from that standpoint he looks good on TV. Of course that leaves out a significant portion of the populace but that's never seemed to bother Trump.
The proper answer to this question is "Yes."
It's an easy thing to say but how do you accomplish that. With large metropolitan police forces it is possible to set up an extensive training program that all officers have to go through that helps to teach officers to de-escalate situations and avoid these shootings that happen without good reason. That doesn't do a thing to address the small local police forces that exist in many communities across the country that may have no training program at all.
I wonder about such a transfer does the value come from the internal value to the company or an external value. For instance something might have great value inside the company but be of little value outside the company due to the additional resources required.
That assumes that the people being replaced are capable of doing those jobs. What you fail to take into account is there are many people that aren't capable of doing much more than a basic manual labor job. The perfect sort for a robot to do. What happens to those people when there are no jobs available? In addition there's the question of retraining all of the people that were displaced by the robots since it seems few companies are willing to pay for training new employees.
That doesn't happen now. Youtube changed the policy so that when a complaint is lodged the money goes into a separate bucket and sits there until the complaint is resolved. Once resolved the money goes to whomever wins the complaint so there is no lost revenue.
The only time this doesn't apply is when more than two people/companies are involved. As Jim Sterling found out if you have multiple companies making copyright complaints then no one gets any money as Youtube bows out of the advertising. Guess they don't want to get involved in lawsuits between multiple corporations so they decided if multiple people make a complaint against a video then no one gets any money (not even Youtube.)
That was a common thing back when I last looked at pirated software. Interestingly enough one of those games was Bioshock Infinite. In my case I found the miner due it being poorly written so that it wouldn't run on the ATI 4670 I was using at the time. Once I knew to look for it there was no problem in finding and removing the bitcoin miner and verifying the game worked. Though I never ended up playing the game until after I later picked up a legit copy of the game.
I've been dealing with Comcast caps since 2008. Started at 250GB and then moved to 300GB a while back. At least 1TB is better than 300GB but they will probably stay at 1TB until the FCC does something else that makes Comcast nervous.
Can it work when passing through the Earth? If so then it still has value as a communication technology that won't be blocked by objects in space or the rotation of the Earth.
I can't agree with you if their courts are like ours. He may be asking for 2 million dollars with the full knowledge that it's a starting place and the actual figure will be well below that. It's not like he's been done tremendous harm so there won't be any damages awarded to him outside of this amount so he starts by asking for 2 million knowing he might get a tenth of that.
Perhaps, but Disney is also very much a capitalistic organism and as such very buys into the right wing values of corporations are more valuable than the people that make them up. Much like people Disney is a complicated beast with aspects of both right/left/libertarian.
The problem with slow changing of channels on Comcast with X1 is due to the one changing a channel is tied in to their head end servers. They end up having to communicate with the head end to get the updated info on the new channel and that slows things down instead of just immediately tuning in to the new channel the way it used to be. So you get all the info on what show is airing when you change channels (whether you care or not) at the cost of slower channel changes.
Because this is a test phase. After all they want to be sure that no one can get their service for free. They did say this is a trial so it may eventually become available for everyone, but they still expect most customers will continue to use set-top boxes.
Also take note that the service isn't going to be tied to only people having Comcast as their ISP so they hope to take customers away from other cable companies by allowing them to use their application to watch Comcast TV even though they are using XYZ Internet service. Which is likely to make any ISP that also provides TV service but currently doesn't have a monthly bandwidth usage limit seriously think about starting one to help keep their customers from looking at a service like Comcast is providing.
You would be wrong. Sure, you will encounter racism but it's nothing like it might have been 50 years ago. I see bi-racial couples on a daily basis even though I live in the Deep South and no one says a thing. Some people might be thinking it's awful but they don't say anything publicly.
That's just a conspiracy designed to hold the common man down.
The only problem with what you've said is that it contradicts what's been reported. From what I've read he made one ruling that could be seen as being against guns and that was only that there wasn't enough evidence prevented to overrule another court and that case was some years ago. So no one knows how he would rule if an actual gun case came before him on the Supreme Court which is one reason to hold hearings where he can be asked about subjects like this.
That's a good way to insure the death of venture capital and IPOs. After all with the current legal environment a shareholder can't legally know what is going on inside the company when deciding what to do with their stock so no one would be foolish enough to take on the liability when they have no say in what happens inside the company (other than the occasional election of officers/board members) and no knowledge of what those people are doing outside of what is public knowledge.
The only way this idea works already exists and that's with a limited set of owners of a company that are involved in the running of said company. So they know what is going on in the company and can directly influence those actions. Shareholders are removed from that direct influence and inside knowledge.
I wouldn't be so sure. Given such a situation there's no reason for them not to hold hearings and vote down the people that Trump nominated. The same applies to President Obama's nominees. If the Senate doesn't like them then hold hearings and vote the nominee down. There's no clearer way of sending a message on what they will not accept, but we know they don't want to put that message out there before an election which is why they are talking about not holding hearings and not casting a vote on this nominee.