Modpoints here, not a denier but I'm still tempted. Painting all skeptics with the same piss-soaked brush doesn't help, it just makes YOU look like a fanatic.
Brilliant! These are *extremely practical* ideas. Unfortunately, upon examining the design of these things (http://www.solo-duo.hu/main.php?category=126) I believe that when attaching two Solos, you'd end up with two leftover Solo rear ends -- basically just the back window and a free axle. I doubt there's any way to stow those inside the combined vehicle; I guess they expect you to keep them at home in your car-hole.
Pretty long odds for the itchy trigger finger set... They'd soon get bored waiting and try to sweeten the pot.
12:00 - leaving 4 grandmas, back in 2 weeks 16:00 - plenty of beer in the fridge for when I get back tho, hope it doesn't get skunky 18:00 - crap, left my rolex on the nitestand 21:00 - crap, wife left her diamonds 22:00 - crap, left the keys in the door 22:30 - crap, left the keys in the truck too 22:45 - crap, told the neighbor some moving guys were coming by around midnight
But they didn't do that. In any way. They simply didn't include everyone else's browser by default.
A little more egregious than that. They intentionally deviated from HTML standards to cause incompatibilities with other browsers, and they used "security" updates to reset IE as the default browser.
It's nowhere in the same ballpark as what Apple has with the iPhone. But it's a very different beast -- a primary appeal of a Windows machine is the huge list of compatible software. The iPhone wasn't conceived that way -- but it's steadily heading into that territory; wouldn't be surprised if Warren G pays them a visit before too long.
when you place a call from your cell phone, the target sees your Google voice on their caller ID, not your cell number, so when they call back, it;s routed through Google voice.
Just to be clear about this -- Google Voice does not and cannot change the outgoing caller ID of any of your phones. Instead, the Google Voice server calls both of you at the same time (the number you're "dialing" using the Google Voice interface and the number of the phone you want to use on your end) and conferences them. That's how they can control what caller ID your callee sees.
Supposed you watched the Firefox commits when they do a security update (or reverse-engineered an IE patch) and discovered how to exploit a fixed vulnerability 2 days after the update. You could call that a 2-day vulnerability, and the small number of days means that a lot of people haven't patched yet.
So a zero-day vulnerability means that nobody's gotten a chance to patch yet, because the security hole is discovered before a patch is available.
That's not free secure wireless. That's free wireless OR secure wireless. The open network isn't secure, and the secure network isn't open.
Ah, I understand now. Reading back, that's what TheLink (130905) was asking for too.
The closest thing I can think of would be to have the PSK included in the SSID (PSK=123abc456def, SSID=Password123abc456def).
I know better than to believe everything I read, but according to ctuffli's post on this page, your secure network isn't secure either -- users can still sniff each other's traffic with a little luck and a little math.
Maybe he's talking about the period from around 1890 to 1960 when most southern states used their states' rights to prevent blacks from voting or holding office, and to prevent criminal punishment for racially motivated lynchings.
Slashdot Mirror
What do shared bathrooms in 1960's Brooklyn apartment buildings have to do with Abe Lincoln?
Modpoints here, not a denier but I'm still tempted. Painting all skeptics with the same piss-soaked brush doesn't help, it just makes YOU look like a fanatic.
(1) It instantly blisters skin on contact
(3) Not only is it good for eating...
I'm having a hard time reconciling the first clause of fact #3 with fact #1.
Not to mention that encouraging novices to google, copy and paste random shell code, and grant it root access is a security nightmare.
(I mean SURE we've all done it, but the more common this gets, the more it'll be used for malicious purposes.)
SELinux and VistA occur, off the top of my head.
Brilliant! These are *extremely practical* ideas. Unfortunately, upon examining the design of these things (http://www.solo-duo.hu/main.php?category=126) I believe that when attaching two Solos, you'd end up with two leftover Solo rear ends -- basically just the back window and a free axle. I doubt there's any way to stow those inside the combined vehicle; I guess they expect you to keep them at home in your car-hole.
There are always half a dozen spots about a foot too small on my block... so break up the car and park each half separately! Brilliant!
Pretty long odds for the itchy trigger finger set... They'd soon get bored waiting and try to sweeten the pot.
12:00 - leaving 4 grandmas, back in 2 weeks
16:00 - plenty of beer in the fridge for when I get back tho, hope it doesn't get skunky
18:00 - crap, left my rolex on the nitestand
21:00 - crap, wife left her diamonds
22:00 - crap, left the keys in the door
22:30 - crap, left the keys in the truck too
22:45 - crap, told the neighbor some moving guys were coming by around midnight
But they didn't do that. In any way. They simply didn't include everyone else's browser by default.
A little more egregious than that. They intentionally deviated from HTML standards to cause incompatibilities with other browsers, and they used "security" updates to reset IE as the default browser.
It's nowhere in the same ballpark as what Apple has with the iPhone. But it's a very different beast -- a primary appeal of a Windows machine is the huge list of compatible software. The iPhone wasn't conceived that way -- but it's steadily heading into that territory; wouldn't be surprised if Warren G pays them a visit before too long.
Aha, makes sense.
when you place a call from your cell phone, the target sees your Google voice on their caller ID, not your cell number, so when they call back, it;s routed through Google voice.
Just to be clear about this -- Google Voice does not and cannot change the outgoing caller ID of any of your phones. Instead, the Google Voice server calls both of you at the same time (the number you're "dialing" using the Google Voice interface and the number of the phone you want to use on your end) and conferences them. That's how they can control what caller ID your callee sees.
Supposed you watched the Firefox commits when they do a security update (or reverse-engineered an IE patch) and discovered how to exploit a fixed vulnerability 2 days after the update. You could call that a 2-day vulnerability, and the small number of days means that a lot of people haven't patched yet.
So a zero-day vulnerability means that nobody's gotten a chance to patch yet, because the security hole is discovered before a patch is available.
You aren't important enough for anyone to want your information.
Incorrect if...
College kids *pay* for poon? I could barely afford gin...
That's not free secure wireless. That's free wireless OR secure wireless. The open network isn't secure, and the secure network isn't open.
Ah, I understand now. Reading back, that's what TheLink (130905) was asking for too.
The closest thing I can think of would be to have the PSK included in the SSID (PSK=123abc456def, SSID=Password123abc456def).
I know better than to believe everything I read, but according to ctuffli's post on this page, your secure network isn't secure either -- users can still sniff each other's traffic with a little luck and a little math.
And don't forget to set them for different channels.
Alternately, if you run dd-wrt, you can try setting up mutltiple virtual wireless networks and have them broadcast separate SSIDs so it looks like you've got two routers.
When they learn to subtract pi, we're all hosed.
Rhymes with Barium? That'll be a boon for Tom Lehrer...
And when I'm finished processing that content I will gladly return it to the closest RIAA representative.
from pressing to delivery
Maybe they mean pressing the "burn" button in Nero.
Maybe he's talking about the period from around 1890 to 1960 when most southern states used their states' rights to prevent blacks from voting or holding office, and to prevent criminal punishment for racially motivated lynchings.
Obviously we need more gay doctors.
Sounds like an improvement over last years' disaster, the Microsoft PowerbookNewton.
(Actually looks pretty damn cool.)
-Standard USB data/charging cable
-USB mass storage support
-Video recording
-Tethering
-Multitasking
-MMS
Very true. ASCII art is good enough for me.