Slashdot Mirror


I Use Twitter, Please Rob Me

nk497 writes "Developers looking to prove a point about the information people are sharing on social networking sites have unveiled a new tool called Please Rob Me. It hunts out tweets from people who are also using location-based services telling the world that they're out of town, and then directs the world to go rob their house. The creators of the site said: 'Don't get us wrong, we love the whole location-aware thing. The information is very interesting and can be used to create some pretty awesome applications. However, the way in which people are stimulated to participate in sharing this information is less awesome.' How long until the first actual robbery takes place?"

403 comments

  1. Sweet! Free Stuff! by Nzimmer911 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Thank you Please Rob Me! My new LED TV is awesome!

    1. Re:Sweet! Free Stuff! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      Thank you Please Rob Me! My new LED TV is awesome!

      WILL ROB AGAIN!!!! A++++++

    2. Re:Sweet! Free Stuff! by Dunbal · · Score: 5, Funny

      Yes, thank you "Please Rob Me" _his_ LED TV really is awesome. Shouldn't have tweeted about the job you just did from the other side of town, dimwit. Expect a surprise when you get home...

      --
      Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
    3. Re:Sweet! Free Stuff! by MrNaz · · Score: 5, Funny

      I wonder if the "seller" will give you an equally positive rating?

      "Smooth, easy transaction. Didn't make too much of a mess. Very little damage to front door. Highly recommended!"

      --
      I hate printers.
    4. Re:Sweet! Free Stuff! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Evil twits feed on each other until they run out of gas money.

    5. Re:Sweet! Free Stuff! by Exitar · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Yes, thank you "Please Rob Me", your wife is really hot! Now I will never have to meet her in a motel again thank to this wonderful service!

    6. Re:Sweet! Free Stuff! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Will NOT rob again!!!!!!! Terrible to work with! Tried stopping me!

    7. Re:Sweet! Free Stuff! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I recall that after a b&e at my home in late 2007, that someone asked me if I was going to watch the Grey Cup on my tv (note: I'm Canadian, eh). My response was that I was sure someone would be watching the game on my tv, but it wouldn't be me.

      *footnote: insurance fixed me up nicely, so I actually came out ahead in the final accounting.

    8. Re:Sweet! Free Stuff! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'll be siphoning gas so my crime spree will last much longer, until I get my first honey pot.

    9. Re:Sweet! Free Stuff! by hippie-joel · · Score: 5, Funny

      Only on Slashdot would this be voted "Insightful".

    10. Re:Sweet! Free Stuff! by wealthychef · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Funny, but seriously, this website is going about it all wrong. How about sending messages to those poor souls saying something like "Hey, you know you are making your location known to possibly unfriendly people?" Rushing right to publish the information to said villains is not the right thing to do, in fact, it's an attack in and of itself and frankly this website should be subject to a lawsuit or even criminal action, as its intent is not benign.

      --
      Currently hooked on AMP
    11. Re:Sweet! Free Stuff! by h3 · · Score: 1

      They *were* doing that - their twitter feed was full of "@so-and-so did you know you are telling people you're not home" messages (something close to 2000).

      That was yesterday. Today, it seems that twitter feed has been suspended, probably since this story hit and got everyone's attention.

    12. Re:Sweet! Free Stuff! by Dan541 · · Score: 1

      this website should be subject to a lawsuit or even criminal action, as its intent is not benign.

      Why, they aren't doing anything wrong. These are public messages.

      --
      An SQL query goes to a bar, walks up to a table and asks, "Mind if I join you?"
    13. Re:Sweet! Free Stuff! by u38cg · · Score: 1

      And everyone should use antivirus, too. Sometimes, a good kick up the arse is what is needed.

      --
      [FUCK BETA]
    14. Re:Sweet! Free Stuff! by wealthychef · · Score: 1

      Well, let's see, they are giving a one-stop shopping depot for people who might want to harm another to find someone in their neighborhood to rob. How is that not doing anything wrong? The information is "public" but not easy to find -- these guys made it really really easy. Just not cool. If that website had remained active, it would be only a matter of time before some asshat used it for its advertised purpose. And you don't see a problem with that? Hmm.

      --
      Currently hooked on AMP
    15. Re:Sweet! Free Stuff! by Dan541 · · Score: 1

      Google also gives quick access to such information.

      --
      An SQL query goes to a bar, walks up to a table and asks, "Mind if I join you?"
    16. Re:Sweet! Free Stuff! by wealthychef · · Score: 1

      Google also gives quick access to such information.

      In theory, but it's not at all the same. This website is advertising the information with the express intent to showcase these individuals' vulnerability to attack. If they actually get their house broken into, well, I guess that's their own damn fault, right?

      --
      Currently hooked on AMP
    17. Re:Sweet! Free Stuff! by Dan541 · · Score: 1

      If they actually get their house broken into, well, I guess that's their own damn fault, right?

      Of course it is.

      They are the one's who broadcast the information publicly it's not like the site is disclosing private information.

      --
      An SQL query goes to a bar, walks up to a table and asks, "Mind if I join you?"
    18. Re:Sweet! Free Stuff! by wealthychef · · Score: 1

      Not everyone understands technology as well as you or even I. Sometimes people make mistakes -- I'm sure that if they knew the risk they would not publish it. It's just plain malicious to "punish them" in this way.

      --
      Currently hooked on AMP
    19. Re:Sweet! Free Stuff! by Dan541 · · Score: 1

      The only person who is punishing them is the burglar, and I do not agree with his actions.

      --
      An SQL query goes to a bar, walks up to a table and asks, "Mind if I join you?"
    20. Re:Sweet! Free Stuff! by Aklyon · · Score: 1

      No, that isn't 'mistakes', people are just Stupid and click yes without reading on every f-ing thig that pops up on facebook.

      --
      I reserve the right to have a physical object so I can sell it later, and recover my money.
  2. Release the lawyers.. by pak9rabid · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I sense some legal trouble for these guys in the near future..

    1. Re:Release the lawyers.. by discord5 · · Score: 5, Funny

      I sense some legal trouble for these guys in the near future..

      Sadly PleaseSueMe.com has already been taken, or they would've been able to set a new trend.

    2. Re:Release the lawyers.. by Idaho · · Score: 4, Informative

      Doubt it, since they obviously don't live in the USA. Good for them, then :)

      --
      Every expression is true, for a given value of 'true'
    3. Re:Release the lawyers.. by Courageous · · Score: 1

      Which country are they in? I can scarcely believe that encouraging people to rob a specific person's house isn't actionable in every first world country.

    4. Re:Release the lawyers.. by kai_hiwatari · · Score: 1

      I sense some legal trouble for these guys in the near future..

      I don't think there is any ground for those people to be sued. They are only using publicly available information - nothing wrong in that.

    5. Re:Release the lawyers.. by xaxa · · Score: 1

      They're also doing nothing more than putting pretty pictures round a Twitter search page: http://twitter.com/search?q=4sq%20-@foursquare.

    6. Re:Release the lawyers.. by mea37 · · Score: 0, Troll

      And I suppose I could beat a guy to death and claim I was only using my hands; I doubt that would get me acquitted.

      Most laws are based on what act was committed, not what tools were used to commit the act. Where laws stray from this (I'm looking at you, DMCA) they are damaging to society.

    7. Re:Release the lawyers.. by tomhudson · · Score: 1

      Just check his twitter feed: http://twitter.com/Mikepruett. He's not home right now, btw.

      Need his address?

      MLT Group
      4012 5th Place NW
      Rochester, MN 55901
      US

      Domain name: PLEASESUEME.COM
      Administrative Contact:
      Pruett, Mike mlt@mltgroup.com
      411 N Broadway
      Lower Level
      Rochester, MN 55906
      US
      507-281-3490

      hththxhand

    8. Re:Release the lawyers.. by 228e2 · · Score: 1

      There is a severe fallacy in your analogy.

      All he was stating is that they are bringing information already made public to a centralized location.
      A proper analogy would be you were selling guns for $0.00 (but still required purchasers to do proper paperwork) and whatever they did with said guns is on them.

      --
      Since when does being a Socialist mean 'someone who has a different opinion than me'?
    9. Re:Release the lawyers.. by Idaho · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Their names look very Dutch to me (I'm Dutch myself), so I'm guessing the Netherlands (or perhaps Belgium).

      You're probably right that "encouraging people to rob a specific person's house is actionable in every first world country". However, that's clearly not their stated intention - to the contrary, in fact.

      In the Netherlands, if someone would start a lawsuit about this (could happen, sure), I'm guessing chances are pretty good that the judge will buy the argument of the website authors, especially since burglars can already trivially find the exact same information if they have two half-working brain cells, and their stated purpose is to actually make people aware of this obvious problem. In addition, whoever starts the lawsuit would probably first have to prove actual damages (e.g. being robbed), and that this was caused by this website, and even then there's the obvious counterpoint that they put this information online themselves in the first place, and it might have been trivially found without that website. The apparent intention (of the website authors) matters as well, probably more so than in the USA (this is just a feeling, I may be wrong).

      So, it's hard to prove that a robbery was "caused" or "encouraged" by this website, even then it involved your own stupidity in putting that information publicly on the internet in the first place, therefore the chances of winning (as the person who got robbed) seem not that great. In addition to that, mostly everyone here has insurance covering their household effects, meaning they'd get (most of) the money back from an insurance company anyway, so why bother with the lawsuit.

      Finally, if you lose, you typically have to pay the legal costs of the defending side - so starting the lawsuit is not without financial risk in the first place.

      Much of this is probably also true in the USA, but the legal costs involved would be higher, and I somehow have a feeling, also the chances of losing. (IANAL, so I may be wrong about that.)

      --
      Every expression is true, for a given value of 'true'
    10. Re:Release the lawyers.. by MrNaz · · Score: 1

      They're just collecting public information, not changing the status of said information.
      If you beat someone to death, most courts would be of the opinion that his status had changed.

      --
      I hate printers.
    11. Re:Release the lawyers.. by OldSoldier · · Score: 1

      And let's not forget you can't outsource burglary... that's a job that has to stay local!

    12. Re:Release the lawyers.. by Courageous · · Score: 1

      In the US, you would certainly get damages from the emotional trauma of having yourself illuminated in this way. I'm surprised it is not like that in the Netherlands, as it is pretty clear to me that the unwilling targets of such a scheme are going to experience a great deal of emotional unrest. That's damage.

      You wouldn't need an actual robbery here for this to be actionable. It's actionable in and of itself.

      C//

    13. Re:Release the lawyers.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In most countries incitement to commit a crime is a crime itself. Proving it is a different matter but a very incriminating criterion is that if a crime wouldn't have been committed if it wasn't for the incitement, the incitement was criminal. So if it can be proven that someone committing a robbery used information that was gathered by these developers, they will be in trouble because of what they call their tool.

    14. Re:Release the lawyers.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So you're saying that if they managed to somehow update the victim's twitter status, then it would be illegal?

    15. Re:Release the lawyers.. by digitig · · Score: 1

      And anyway, there's a fundamental flaw in the argument. It assumes that people live alone, so when they're out the house is empty. Oh, wait, this is people who twitter, isn't it? Sorry, my mistake,

      --
      Quidnam Latine loqui modo coepi?
    16. Re:Release the lawyers.. by sabt-pestnu · · Score: 1

      What, you can only get sued if you live in the USA? Mind, even if the lawsuit fails, you're still on the hook for defending against it, usually.

    17. Re:Release the lawyers.. by StikyPad · · Score: 1

      However, that's clearly not their stated intention - to the contrary, in fact.

      Uh, yeah.. because stating that your intent is the opposite of what you're doing makes it ok, just like we learned on the playground.

      "It's not my intent to hit you in the face, but I'm going to start swinging my arms and walking toward you..."

    18. Re:Release the lawyers.. by mea37 · · Score: 1

      Again, you're busily looking at the aspects of what they're doing that aren't illegal and trying to use that as proof that they're not doing anything illegal. It's a neat rhetorical trick, but don't expect it to work in court should you ever find yourself there.

      Back to the analogy - the Please Rob Me folks don't "change the status" of the information (according to your argument), and likewise in a murder the perpetrator doesn't change the status of his weapon.

      The perpetrator does change the status of the victim, in both cases. The location information is not the victim, so your attempt to twist the analogy is nonsense.

      Collecting, filtering, indexing, and publishing information in a manner expressely designed to facilitate a crime - and even going so far as to say "commit a crime here" - is definitely grounds for civil liability and may be a criminal act.

    19. Re:Release the lawyers.. by RCL · · Score: 1

      I think they are misusing already public (or is it? aren't twitter posts intellectual property of their authors?) information to aid criminals (perhaps inadvertedly, but still). I believe it is punishable: it's like giving the keys to someone's locked house (even already freely available because of owner's stupidity) to anyone who asks for them (or even worse, encouraging to rob the house at the same time). Sure, the criminals could have found the keys themselves, but by making their lives easier you are increasing the chances of robbery, even if your intent was to warn the potential victim.

    20. Re:Release the lawyers.. by Dan541 · · Score: 1

      Why, they are not doing anything wrong.

      Any liability rests on the individual making the information public. Not the website that cites such information.

      --
      An SQL query goes to a bar, walks up to a table and asks, "Mind if I join you?"
    21. Re:Release the lawyers.. by Dan541 · · Score: 1

      It is perfectly legal to encourage someone to rob your house, but if you try to claim insurance then it is fraud.

      --
      An SQL query goes to a bar, walks up to a table and asks, "Mind if I join you?"
    22. Re:Release the lawyers.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Evidently you've never heard of incitement to crime. You can be found guilty of it if it is deemed that any specific crime would not have been committed if it wasn't for your encouragement. Note that encouragement does not involve any reward.

    23. Re:Release the lawyers.. by Dan541 · · Score: 1

      Only if it's a third party that does the encouraging, in this instance it is simply negligence on the part of the home owner. Similar to leaving a door unlocked.

      --
      An SQL query goes to a bar, walks up to a table and asks, "Mind if I join you?"
    24. Re:Release the lawyers.. by mea37 · · Score: 1

      A proper analogy would be you were selling guns for $0.00 (but still required purchasers to do proper paperwork) and saying "use this to commit a crime" - and of course as soon as you do that, "whatever they did with said guns" is not exclusively "on them".

      Fixed that for you.

    25. Re:Release the lawyers.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, it makes no difference whether it's a third party or not. Now, obviously nobody would be prosecuted if they get robbed because they've left the door unlocked since that's - like you said - negligence. Frankly, I'd say it's pretty hard to come up with something you could do to encourage someone to rob your house that couldn't be considered negligence but would also not appear as too good to be true to attract any criminals (even if you never should underestimate their stupidity).

  3. "How long until the first actual robbery" by TheMeuge · · Score: 4, Insightful

    This isn't news. People's houses are cleared out regularly due to their Facebook status.

    1. Re:"How long until the first actual robbery" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But then it IS news! Now twitterererers(sp?) can have the same, um, benefits as Facebookers...

    2. Re:"How long until the first actual robbery" by i.r.id10t · · Score: 3, Insightful

      And before facebook (or any other social networking stuff) there were the obituaries in the local paper...

      --
      Don't blame me, I voted for Kodos
    3. Re:"How long until the first actual robbery" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just wait until someone makes an app for the Iphone to alert you when people are away from home.

    4. Re:"How long until the first actual robbery" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      twitterererers(sp?)

      "twats", seriously - it so perfect

    5. Re:"How long until the first actual robbery" by jgtg32a · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Or Twits to be a bit more accurate

    6. Re:"How long until the first actual robbery" by Arimus · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Or just forgetting to cancel the milk or the pile of post just inside the front door, or news papers you forgot to cancel etc etc etc.

      --
      --- Users are like bacteria -> Each one causing a thousand tiny crises until the host finally gives up and dies.
    7. Re:"How long until the first actual robbery" by Potor · · Score: 3, Informative

      Most houses are empty between 9-5, MTWTrF.

    8. Re:"How long until the first actual robbery" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      What the hell? Did facebook invent robbery? It's pretty fuck-face clear that everyone works 8 hours every day, usually from around 7 in the morning until 3 in the afternoon and children go to school pretty much the same time. Which retarded individual would need a whole week/few days to clear out valuables? You do a quick in-and-out after carefully picking the secluded house with fancy garden and low security in a neighborhood where no one knows you! NOT based on that *one* of the residents in the house *might* be out of town for the day, amateurs!

    9. Re:"How long until the first actual robbery" by Monkeedude1212 · · Score: 1

      The difference between that and this is that generally, you have to stalk someones facebook status to notice when they're out of town, and thats when you strike.

      Developers wrote a tool to follow tweets and then inform its users "This person is gone." - Basically automating the step of following people and sifting through tweets.

    10. Re:"How long until the first actual robbery" by Lumpy · · Score: 3, Funny

      Which is why my facebook status is usually.....

      "hunkered down bwehind sandbags in view of the door. Itching to try out my new 10 gauge semiautomatic shotgun..."

      or

      " need to leave for supplies, I have claymore mines set up all over the house, I hope I dont trip one again when I come home and kill the new dog like last time."

      For some reason I dont get any visitors... even from friends.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    11. Re:"How long until the first actual robbery" by Rary · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Or just forgetting to cancel the milk or the pile of post just inside the front door, or news papers you forgot to cancel etc etc etc.

      There is a bit of a difference between leaving signs that you're away visible to anyone who happens to be passing your home, and actually broadcasting that information on the internet. More to the point, people who might otherwise take precautions, like getting a friend to pick up their mail while they're away on vacation, end up broadcasting the fact that they're away to the whole net-connected world and think nothing of it.

      Of course, the detail that has been left out is that a Twitter search won't tell you if the alarm has been armed or if the three nasty rottweilers have been fed recently.

      --

      "You cannot simultaneously prevent and prepare for war." -- Albert Einstein

    12. Re:"How long until the first actual robbery" by Deadplant · · Score: 1

      oh henny-penny the sky is falling!
      Half the bloody country clears out of their houses for 8 hours every weekday.
      There is no shortage of empty houses to rob.

    13. Re:"How long until the first actual robbery" by swb · · Score: 5, Funny

      "Out shopping for a new aquariums for my rattlesnake collection. The last burglar knocked them over running from the German Shepherds. Don't look forward to finding all 10 snakes, either."

    14. Re:"How long until the first actual robbery" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well if such information makes additional people think they can get away with burglary it will certainly lead to more attempts in the future. You don't have to be smart to be a burglar, you just have to be willing and physically able to break into another person's home and take their stuff.*shrug*

    15. Re:"How long until the first actual robbery" by somegeekynick · · Score: 1

      Those are for the observant. The is for Gen 2.0.

    16. Re:"How long until the first actual robbery" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      I can heartily recommend Trursday as the best day for theivery, as it's often overlooked.

    17. Re:"How long until the first actual robbery" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      7-3? That is not a common work time frame where I'm from. What country are you from?

    18. Re:"How long until the first actual robbery" by Bakkster · · Score: 1

      Of course, the detail that has been left out is that a Twitter search won't tell you if the alarm has been armed or if the three nasty rottweilers have been fed recently.

      Neither will a pile of newspapers on the front porch.

      --
      Write your representatives! Repeal the 2nd Law of Thermodynamics!
    19. Re:"How long until the first actual robbery" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No kiddin.g.

      I work from home. Throughout the day I'm used to salespeople coming by and selling crap (water purifiers, auto glass, meat). I usually ignore them. Last year I heard the door bell ring. I didn't answer because I didn't know the person. I could see him through both the window and the remote viewer ("hidden" in the doorbell ringer assembly). He calls out, "Hello, anyone home?" After a couple minutes he starts trying to break into the garage door that's next to the front door. The cops were happy for the video recording :D

    20. Re:"How long until the first actual robbery" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I thought he was trying to make sure we didn't think he meant Tuesday twice. That would really suck. "Damn! Last Tuesday I was robbed twice also!"

    21. Re:"How long until the first actual robbery" by MrNaz · · Score: 1

      Bonus points if you can make it monitor a *specific* house. My neighbor just got a sweet new home theater setup!

      --
      I hate printers.
    22. Re:"How long until the first actual robbery" by MrNaz · · Score: 1

      It will tell you that the three nasty rottweilers aren't yet desperate enough to eat the newspapers, so you *might* be safe robbing the place.

      --
      I hate printers.
    23. Re:"How long until the first actual robbery" by MiniMike · · Score: 4, Funny

      Hmm. My new Facebook status:

      "New shotgun looks and shoots great, really rounds out collection. Staying home this week since winning another martial arts championship. The new Rotweiler gets along great with the Dobermans."

    24. Re:"How long until the first actual robbery" by Bakkster · · Score: 1

      I'm not worried by them eating the newspapers, I'm worried that they've broken through the front door in order to get onto the porch!

      --
      Write your representatives! Repeal the 2nd Law of Thermodynamics!
    25. Re:"How long until the first actual robbery" by ndogg · · Score: 1

      Who has milk delivered to them any more?

      --
      // file: mice.h
      #include "frickin_lasers.h"
    26. Re:"How long until the first actual robbery" by Cro+Magnon · · Score: 1

      I live in an older area, where many people, including me, don't have garages. It's fairly easy to tell that I'm not home because my car is gone. They don't even need to know my schedule.

      --
      Slow down, cowboy! It has been 4 hours since you last posted. You must wait another few hours.
    27. Re:"How long until the first actual robbery" by laejoh · · Score: 1

      Witnesses heard the burglar shout: "Enough is enough! I have had it with these motherfucking snakes in this motherfucking place!"

    28. Re:"How long until the first actual robbery" by Cro+Magnon · · Score: 1

      7-3? That is not a common work time frame where I'm from. What country are you from?

      That time is halfway accurate for me. I leave the house around 7, but I get back around 5-6.

      --
      Slow down, cowboy! It has been 4 hours since you last posted. You must wait another few hours.
    29. Re:"How long until the first actual robbery" by rubycodez · · Score: 1

      since January, robberies have been down a significant percent. wonder if part of it is due to people actually being home during "working hours" because of joblessness or having to work "odd jobs" based from home?

    30. Re:"How long until the first actual robbery" by DavidTC · · Score: 1

      Except Facebook doesn't have location stats, and you need permission to see their info.

      With twitter, it's entirely possible to design a tool that a) follows people automatically, b) sees if they are posting location-giving tweets, c) determines where their house is from said tweets (Pretty easy, statistically), and then d) notices when they are 250+ miles away from that house. (I actually think you can see people's tweets without following them, so I think (a) is not needed.)

      At that point, it can involve a human, perhaps even showing them the tweets before they relocated to actually see what's going on, how long they will be on vacation, and if their house is empty. Perhaps it could even search for references to 'wife' or 'roommate', alerting the criminal that said victim has one and they need to discover if this person is out of town also.

      You really could automate 95% of all this, finding locations that are about 50% likely to be someone on vacation. And sometimes will be a coffee shop and sometimes there will be someone else there, but it's much easier than trying to find the people on vacation randomly.

      --
      If corporations are people, aren't stockholders guilty of slavery?
    31. Re:"How long until the first actual robbery" by ChefInnocent · · Score: 1

      You'd think January would be a slow month anyway as a thief would leave foot/tire tracks in the snow in the northern states.

    32. Re:"How long until the first actual robbery" by rubycodez · · Score: 1

      was down compared to January year before. with the advent of Walmart in most northern cities perp footprints turn out to be with the same footware as ten thousand other people.

    33. Re:"How long until the first actual robbery" by SeaFox · · Score: 1

      Some people do apparently.

      http://www.oberweis.com/web/default.asp

    34. Re:"How long until the first actual robbery" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      forgetting to cancel the milk

      What millennia are you from?

    35. Re:"How long until the first actual robbery" by gparent · · Score: 1

      Yeah but it's thursday not trsday.

    36. Re:"How long until the first actual robbery" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      forgetting to cancel the milk

      What millennia are you from?

      the third, second, and first BC, and the first AD. You?

    37. Re:"How long until the first actual robbery" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You joke, but I still vividly recall a news story from 28 years ago about a auto parts store owner who got tired of being robbed. The crooks kept thwarting the alarm system and poisoning his attack dogs. So, he got 6 rattlesnakes (10 would have been overkill). During the day he kept them in an aquarium up front where everyone could see them whith a sight that stated they were released into the store every night. He was never robbed again. He did however have to delay opening the store a few times because he had trouble finding all the snakes.

    38. Re:"How long until the first actual robbery" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In Brazil the robbers don't care if you are home or not. They break in whenever they can, and if there is people inside, too bad for the people inside.

    39. Re:"How long until the first actual robbery" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sure, you and I know that, but telling it to Thuesday.

    40. Re:"How long until the first actual robbery" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your post must be under 140 characters. You may post a longer message through Twitlonger.

    41. Re:"How long until the first actual robbery" by sleeping143 · · Score: 1

      Woosh! Cleared those last two by a good distance...

    42. Re:"How long until the first actual robbery" by Rary · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Of course, the detail that has been left out is that a Twitter search won't tell you if the alarm has been armed or if the three nasty rottweilers have been fed recently.

      Neither will a pile of newspapers on the front porch.

      Actually, the pile of newspapers does at least suggest that there are no rottweilers. If there were, somebody would be in charge of feeding them and letting them outside to "do their business", and most likely that person would pick up the newspapers while they're at it.

      The newspapers don't, of course, tell you whether the alarm is armed, but of course there's always those stickers and signs that alarm companies put up all around your house when they install the alarm. The presence of signs/stickers suggests the alarm is probably armed (why wouldn't it be?), while a lack of signs/stickers suggests the alarm isn't armed (or even installed).

      --

      "You cannot simultaneously prevent and prepare for war." -- Albert Einstein

    43. Re:"How long until the first actual robbery" by StikyPad · · Score: 1

      Of course, the detail that has been left out is that a Twitter search won't tell you if the alarm has been armed or if the three nasty rottweilers have been fed recently.

      Alarms are overrated and rottweilers can be bypassed for $0.50 worth of Milkbones.

    44. Re:"How long until the first actual robbery" by Potor · · Score: 1

      I picked up that habit when I was an undergrad at the University of Waterloo, where Tr is used for Thursday (or at least was until 1991).

    45. Re:"How long until the first actual robbery" by sucati · · Score: 1

      milk service? really? don't you go to the store anyhow for everything else?

    46. Re:"How long until the first actual robbery" by TheLink · · Score: 1

      > Actually, the pile of newspapers does at least suggest that there are no rottweilers. If there were, somebody would be in charge of feeding them

      You might assume wrongly and end up feeding them :).

      --
    47. Re:"How long until the first actual robbery" by Bakkster · · Score: 1

      The newspapers don't, of course, tell you whether the alarm is armed, but of course there's always those stickers and signs that alarm companies put up all around your house when they install the alarm. The presence of signs/stickers suggests the alarm is probably armed (why wouldn't it be?), while a lack of signs/stickers suggests the alarm isn't armed (or even installed).

      Which was my original point: twitter geotagging is just as effective as a newpaper pile at telling you that there is an alarm. How useful is that? Not at all.

      Of course the newspaper pile means you're within walking distance to check (or to ring the doorbell and listen for rotweilers...) which is an advantage, but twitter lets you scope out more buildings faster.

      --
      Write your representatives! Repeal the 2nd Law of Thermodynamics!
    48. Re:"How long until the first actual robbery" by Dragoness+Eclectic · · Score: 1

      Northern U.S. didn't have back-to-back blizzards dropping 3 f***ing feet of snow last January, either. Who is going to go rob houses in that?

      --
      ---dragoness
    49. Re:"How long until the first actual robbery" by rubycodez · · Score: 1

      I live near chicago, we had no snow like that this year (some other places did). Regional crime down over 8% since last September.

    50. Re:"How long until the first actual robbery" by zill · · Score: 1

      Maybe it was due to the snow storm?

      Just looking at 2 years worth of data is far from significant. We need to at least look at the robberies committed per capita for the past 10 years.

    51. Re:"How long until the first actual robbery" by moortak · · Score: 1

      There are also people like myself who don't necessarily pick up their paper.

      --
      Xavier Rabourdin for president 2012
    52. Re:"How long until the first actual robbery" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, not really, the AC was just dumb.

    53. Re:"How long until the first actual robbery" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "I'm afraid one of the snakes might have been accidentally taken out with the body bag for the last burgler."

    54. Re:"How long until the first actual robbery" by Belial6 · · Score: 1

      Actually, those little stickers are pretty effective. Having known a few burglars, they were pretty unanimous in the behavior of moving to an easier target every time they saw any sign of an alarm system.

    55. Re:"How long until the first actual robbery" by DarthVain · · Score: 1

      If I am dead and still tweeting, someone please come and either:

      A) unbury me! (somehow I doubt that is an actual word)

      or

      B) give me their Braaains!

    56. Re:"How long until the first actual robbery" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or just forgetting to cancel the milk or the pile of post just inside the front door, or news papers you forgot to cancel etc etc etc.

      There is a bit of a difference between leaving signs that you're away visible to anyone who happens to be passing your home, and actually broadcasting that information on the internet. More to the point, people who might otherwise take precautions, like getting a friend to pick up their mail while they're away on vacation, end up broadcasting the fact that they're away to the whole net-connected world and think nothing of it.

      Of course, the detail that has been left out is that a Twitter search won't tell you if the alarm has been armed or if the three nasty rottweilers have been fed recently.

      Or, I dunno, IF ANYONE ELSE LIVES THERE. Seriously, this might be more of an issue if everybody in the world lived all alone, but just because one person leaves the house doesn't mean the house is empty.

      That's not to say that I don't think publishing your whole life on the internet is a good idea, but I think that assuming that someone's home is empty and ripe for robbery because they went online somewhere other than home is a bit of a stretch.

    57. Re:"How long until the first actual robbery" by Rary · · Score: 1

      Actually, those little stickers are pretty effective. Having known a few burglars, they were pretty unanimous in the behavior of moving to an easier target every time they saw any sign of an alarm system.

      I've heard that 90% of an alarm's effectiveness is in the stickers, as burglars are usually looking for an easy target. It is even possible to buy fake alarm company stickers online, and security companies have been known to come down hard on counterfeit sticker makers.

      --

      "You cannot simultaneously prevent and prepare for war." -- Albert Einstein

    58. Re:"How long until the first actual robbery" by Dan541 · · Score: 1

      But they need to know the address of the robbery victim and twitter does not list peoples home addresses.

      --
      An SQL query goes to a bar, walks up to a table and asks, "Mind if I join you?"
    59. Re:"How long until the first actual robbery" by shmelly · · Score: 1

      Since I have totally given up trying to post on topic any more:

      People still subscribe to milk?

    60. Re:"How long until the first actual robbery" by Dalambertian · · Score: 1

      Yes, there is a difference. However, if I started driving around town looking for all the signs of absence and then published the results online, people would not applaud my efforts. why? because even if the information is out there and easily accessible, gathering it for the sole purpose of emphasizing security risks is a sure sign of me being a jackass. You don't applaud the guy who makes an I Use Twitter, Please Rape Me app either.

    61. Re:"How long until the first actual robbery" by Belial6 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      You don't need to buy 'fake' stickers. There are plenty of stickers that don't have a specific companies name on them. This is because security systems are not generally made by the monitoring company. Companies like Brinks probably don't want you to realize that they just buy off the shelf equipment and then sell it at 1000% markup. Anyone interested should check out http://www.smarthome.com./ They sell the same stuff as the monitoring companies. They also have partnered with a monitoring company that will happily work with self installers. It is dramatically cheaper. Obviously, this is only advice for those that are comfortable setting up their own electronics. It isn't hard, but you do have to read the directions.

      For those those that just want the sticker, they can buy the stickers there too. There is nothing 'fake' about the stickers. Brinks and their like don't have a patent on putting a sticker on your window to say that you have a security system.

      That being said. Actual as I said, you are right, actual burglars have told me that 90% of an alarm's effectiveness is in the stickers.

    62. Re:"How long until the first actual robbery" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dobermen

    63. Re:"How long until the first actual robbery" by Bakkster · · Score: 1

      If it's geotagged, there will be a GPS coordinate. Add a little bit of online sleuthing and it shouldn't be to hard to narrow the search down.

      --
      Write your representatives! Repeal the 2nd Law of Thermodynamics!
    64. Re:"How long until the first actual robbery" by Drugmath · · Score: 1

      There is a bit of a difference between leaving signs that you're away visible to anyone who happens to be passing your home, and actually broadcasting that information on the internet. More to the point, people who might otherwise take precautions, like getting a friend to pick up their mail while they're away on vacation, end up broadcasting the fact that they're away to the whole net-connected world and think nothing of it.

      You're creating a false dichotomy where there need not be one. There's no difference between taking the precaution of having a friend pick up your mail and taking the precaution of not broadcasting your whereabouts to the entire fucking world

  4. I for one... by Mashdar · · Score: 2, Funny

    welcome our new squatter neighbors.

  5. should not take long by onepoint · · Score: 0

    after the site get's /. I figure about 6 hours we should be seeing reports LOL

    --
    if you see me, smile and say hello.
  6. Everyone leaves their homes by Rurik · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Yes, physical security, you're away from your home. So are a vast majority of people from between the hours of 9AM to 3PM every day. There's been a lot of backlash over this site, including Twitter suspending their account, which is just silly. It's the same level of surveillance that someone can do by just parking in front of your home. It's just that now they can see you over FourSquare (speaking of silly...). It's the same as posting on Twitter that you're stuck in traffic, or sending an email from a work-only address. Just another in a very, very long list of ways to see where you're currently at.

    Criminals will still just sit out in front of your house and wait for the cars the leave.

    1. Re:Everyone leaves their homes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Sure, everyone leaves home, sometime. But, even a regular work schedule gets unexpected interruptions. People get sick, play hookie, take a personal day, etc. So, a would be thief can never be sure if you are there or not. Sure, they can setup camp outside and watch the house, that's a tried and true technique. But, you have to preselect your victim to do that and then exert some effort as well as risk being spotted while casing the joint.

      But, with people Twittering and Facebooking their whereabouts a perpetrator can simply search for whoever isn't home right now. If they decide to target an individual, they can do so from a distance with very little effort, no chance of being discovered while they stalk their target, and near certainty that the target is not home.

      You imply that these technologies are no greater threat than everyday real world threats. But, the truth is that these technologies allow the perpetrator to automate and vastly increase the efficiency of their "work". It is definitely a greater threat. You just lack vision.

    2. Re:Everyone leaves their homes by Critical+Facilities · · Score: 1

      Criminals will still just sit out in front of your house and wait for the cars the leave.

      Parent is spot on. Any way you cut it, if someone really wants to get into your house, they're going to get in. It's a balance of how difficult are you going to make it for someone else to know you're away and how hard it is to get into your house versus how badly that person wants to get into your house.

    3. Re:Everyone leaves their homes by Mashdar · · Score: 1

      But what about all those risk averse criminals who want to be sure you are >30 minutes away by helicopter??

    4. Re:Everyone leaves their homes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Criminals will still just sit out in front of your house and wait for the cars the leave.

      Not in my neighbourhood, because we have a Neighbourhood Watch program. In fact, I think just about every neighbourhood I visited in my city has a Neighbourhood Watch program. So I guess there's no crime here.

    5. Re:Everyone leaves their homes by Lumpy · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I make it as difficult as my insurance company wants it to be.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    6. Re:Everyone leaves their homes by ericlondaits · · Score: 1

      When someone is away from his home there might still be a spouse or sons living there, someone house-sitting, or on an eventual visit to feed the cat. Parking in front of the house still seems the best option.

      --
      As a Slashdot discussion grows longer, the probability of an analogy involving cars approaches one.
    7. Re:Everyone leaves their homes by Rary · · Score: 4, Insightful

      This is exactly the point. Computers didn't enter the workplace so that people could suddenly do things that they couldn't do before. Computers simply made those work activities more efficient and effective. The same is true for other uses of computers. Using computers in crime doesn't mean crimes occur where they couldn't before, just that the criminals are more efficient and effective.

      Besides, someone using old-fashioned casing techniques would assume that my house is empty right now because I normally leave for work at 6:45. However, someone using modern casing techniques (if I were a Twitter/Facebook/Foursquare user) would know that I'm working from home today.

      This kind of technology takes much of the risk out of burglarizing homes.

      --

      "You cannot simultaneously prevent and prepare for war." -- Albert Einstein

    8. Re:Everyone leaves their homes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I for one loved the feature. Before I'd be able to rob one, sometimes two houses a day. Now, using that site and an heuristic for the traveling salesman problem I'm able to rob 10+ houses and I'm able to find some very good loot now.

      The best of all is that now I'm almost untrackable. Right after looting several houses in a city I get on the road to a different state. While I'm travelling I turn on one of my smartphones and learn the best route for robbing an entirely new city in a different state.

      After two weeks of intensive work I can just sit back and relax for one more day or so. I love technology.

    9. Re:Everyone leaves their homes by vxice · · Score: 1

      but screaming out online where a bunch of other people are doing the exact same thing all in the same place with the same interface IS making it easier. and this is not targeting anyone specific but anyone in general. If the criminal is sitting in front of a house he can only see what is on that street, why not observe everyone in a city all at once without any effort.

      --
      every anarchist is a baffled dictator. Benito_Mussolini
    10. Re:Everyone leaves their homes by BrokenHalo · · Score: 1

      So are a vast majority of people from between the hours of 9AM to 3PM every day.

      Incidentally, the situation sometimes isn't helped by the legal system. Here in Western Australia, breaking into and stealing from property during the hours of daylight is regarded as a different crime from doing the same thing at night. Go figure. I didn't vote for the craniorectal that came up with that one. :-{

    11. Re:Everyone leaves their homes by houghi · · Score: 1

      And then there are the thieves who just do some sort of wardriving, look at houses, see if they are perhaps easy to break in to and rob those.

      Say my status says I am on a holiday and they come by, they will still want to know if there is an alarm, neighbours to watch and what not.

      --
      Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
    12. Re:Everyone leaves their homes by Loki_1929 · · Score: 1

      It's treated differently in many US states too. Breaking into a house late at night in the US is (depending on the state) considered a direct threat on the life of anyone living there. Find a thief in your house at 2am? Feel free to take him out in any way you can. In a "your home is your castle" state, unless you tied him up before killing him, there's basically nothing the police are going to do to you. In high school, our government teacher told us that if we ever caught a thief climbing out the window with our television late at night and decided to shoot him, make sure the body falls back inside. ;)

      --
      -- "Government is the great fiction through which everybody endeavors to live at the expense of everybody else."
    13. Re:Everyone leaves their homes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't park in front of just one house. I use Twitter to profile the activity of an entire city and Concorde to find an optimal tour and dynamic programming to optimally fill my Knapsack. I am smarter than the average burglar.

    14. Re:Everyone leaves their homes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Besides, someone using old-fashioned casing techniques would assume that my house is empty right now because I normally leave for work at 6:45.

      Woohoo! He's gone!

      However, someone using modern casing techniques (if I were a Twitter/Facebook/Foursquare user) would know that I'm working from home today.

      Shit!

    15. Re:Everyone leaves their homes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because you don't know where those fucking people *LIVE*, moron.

    16. Re:Everyone leaves their homes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Another similar situation is having an answering machine saying "I'm not home right now, please leave a message"

    17. Re:Everyone leaves their homes by cduffy · · Score: 1

      Just because someone knows when I'm away from home doesn't mean they know when my German Shepherd is away from home, or my brother-in-law, or my wife -- every one of us keeps different hours, all of us (except the dog) know where the shotgun is, and one of us is a privacy enthusiast who quite certainly doesn't use Twitter. (Also, we live in Texas, where both laws and juries tend to be sympathetic to individuals defending their households with force).

      As such, I'm perfectly comfortable being free with my location data -- as if someone tries to use this app's indication that _I_ am away from home as reason to believe that _my house_ is undefended, that person is likely in for a surprise. (Yes, even when I'm out-of-town; we rarely go on vacations together, either).

      Now, I'm not saying that everyone's circumstances match mine -- but what I am saying is that the decision on what tools it is or isn't safe for an individual to use is best made by that individual alone, in full consideration of their own personal circumstances.

    18. Re:Everyone leaves their homes by jimicus · · Score: 1

      Incidentally, the situation sometimes isn't helped by the legal system. Here in Western Australia, breaking into and stealing from property during the hours of daylight is regarded as a different crime from doing the same thing at night. Go figure. I didn't vote for the craniorectal that came up with that one. :-{

      The precedent for this goes back some way - I believe in the bible it is described a different crime after dark - though I can't remember off the top of my head where in the bible exactly.

    19. Re:Everyone leaves their homes by Trent+Hawkins · · Score: 1

      The best thing to do is to twitter about your attack dog and how he bites through your coffee table whenever you leave him alone in the house (which is always).

    20. Re:Everyone leaves their homes by fucket · · Score: 1

      I would take it a step further and not rob anyone that even owns a helicopter.

    21. Re:Everyone leaves their homes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      9AM to 3PM? WTF? You only work 5 fucking hours a day?

      Most of us have real jobs where it's 8AM to 5PM and that makes it about 7AM to 6PM once you add the commuting.

    22. Re:Everyone leaves their homes by DavidTC · · Score: 1

      I think you, and others, are fairly confused.

      The question isn't when you're at work. Work is not far enough away. For all they know, you got sick, and will be pulling up any second. Or you just didn't work today, and you're at the mall. Or someone lives in the house who doesn't work and doesn't have a car. Or the maid or your boyfriend are about to show up and let themselves in.

      It is simply not safe to target random, unobserved houses with no cars in the driveway. Especially during the day. At night, you have slightly better luck, if there's no car at 4 in the morning it's entirely possible that everyone there is sleeping somewhere else...OTOH, that's exactly when people expect robbers to show up, so are extra paranoid if happen to be away and see a strange car pull into a neighbor's house.

      Meanwhile, observing a house isn't safe either. That's the entire point of Neighborhood Watches. Good luck in surveilling a house long enough to figure out exactly what's going on and the schedule of the people inside it. There's a reason cops don't do it that much, and aren't really trying to figure out a 'schedule', just where people go and who visits them.

      Criminals do both those things, breaking in without checking, and just watching the house...and often get caught at it.

      It is much, much safer to do it when someone is out of town, and other people know they are out of town so won't be coming over. Hence the old 'Look for papers piling up' trick. That still required crooks to drive around semi-randomly, though.

      Now, as the article points out, they can get a computer program that can look at tons of tweets, find people who are are normally nearby, and what location they seem to live at, and then notice when they are fairly far away, which in and of itself is a major advantage. Knowing some one is physically 200 miles away means they can't possibly show up in the next hour. The fact the criminal can then look at the tweets and figure out if other people live in the house, how long they'll be away, wait for another tweet to pin down the fact they're still there, etc, is just icing on the cake.

      --
      If corporations are people, aren't stockholders guilty of slavery?
    23. Re:Everyone leaves their homes by yali · · Score: 1

      Criminals will still just sit out in front of your house and wait for the cars the leave.

      You've got a very high opinion of criminals.

      A smart, patient, motivated criminal could probably get into 90% of ordinary people's homes without too much trouble. But in contrast to the romanticized catburglars in movies, in the real world smart, patient, motivated people don't generally become criminals. Most actual criminals are impulsive dumbasses. This service is perfect for the "I'm jonesing for my next meth fix, where can I get some easily-pawned stuff RIGHT NOW" crowd that make up the vast majority of actual criminals.

    24. Re:Everyone leaves their homes by RJFerret · · Score: 1

      But, with people Twittering and Facebooking their whereabouts a perpetrator can simply search for whoever isn't home right now. If they decide to target an individual, they can do so from a distance with very little effort, no chance of being discovered while they stalk their target, and near certainty that the target is not home.

      The service PleaseRobMe.com is satirizing is Foursquare, which tells you where someone IS. So now you can send your girlfriend over to the bar to keep the guy their as long as you need, or your buddy to watch for when a couple is done elsewhere. After all, you are likely to have their picture at your fingertips! If they show at a theater, you can figure an average movie is 100 minutes (unless their spouse's feed mentions having purchased tickets to Avatar a few days ago, in which case you have longer).

      The mistake respondent ericlondaits makes here...

      When someone is away from his home there might still be a spouse or sons living there, someone house-sitting, or on an eventual visit to feed the cat. Parking in front of the house still seems the best option.

      ...is that you can easily read back their feed or check their contacts to see if they have a spouse, that sons are off on spring break, their friends swing by to feed the cat in the morning, and they don't have a dog to worry about, only an exotic pure breed feline worth snatching too. (It can be found hiding in it's usual corner and lured out with toy foam dart gun darts--it's favorite thing to chase.)

      Why spend time parking in front of the house? You lower your hourly rate that way (unless that's where you do these checks), expose yourself to scrutiny and don't gain much greater info than they already volunteered!

      I enjoy being social and sharing, but I don't publish when I'm away publicly--I post the same mundane things until my return. That being said, I appreciate the lower hanging fruit making my place a less likely target.

      -Randy

    25. Re:Everyone leaves their homes by Rurik · · Score: 1

      You miss the concept of core work hours. :) Work schedules are likely 6-3, 7-4, 8-5, 9-6. Look at the overlap and the core hours where nearly everyone is at work is 9-3.

    26. Re:Everyone leaves their homes by NickDngr · · Score: 1

      However, someone using modern casing techniques (if I were a Twitter/Facebook/Foursquare user) would know that I'm working from home today.

      I don't know what kind of job you have, but I can't think of any that involve commenting on /., so I wouldn't say that you're working from home.

      --
      Yoda of Borg am I! Assimilated shall you be! Futile resistance is, hmm?
    27. Re:Everyone leaves their homes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Again, WTF? Who the hell work from 6AM to 3PM? 6AM!?!?!?

    28. Re:Everyone leaves their homes by zill · · Score: 1

      Criminals will still just sit out in front of your house and wait for the cars the leave.

      They might get arrested (or at least harrassed) for loitering if they physically stake out a house. Using non-physical stalking methods is much safer.

    29. Re:Everyone leaves their homes by zill · · Score: 1
    30. Re:Everyone leaves their homes by QuantumG · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      This kind of technology takes much of the risk out of burglarizing homes.

      Ya know what, unlike you I actually know some burglars... they don't give a shit if you are home or not. They pick which house to attack on a whim and they break in, take what they can get, and get out faster than you can react. If you put up a fight, they shoot you. The myth of a "cat burglar" who sneaks in an upstairs window and leaves a calling card on your pillow is fantasy.

      Sheesh.

      --
      How we know is more important than what we know.
    31. Re:Everyone leaves their homes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's the same level of surveillance that someone can do by just parking in front of your home.

      I don't know about you, but I can't physically park in front of a million homes at once...

  7. poor thieves by f3r · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I can also imagine guys tweeting as if they were on holidays, but being home-entrenched and armed to the teeth, just for the fun of shooting at thieves.

    1. Re:poor thieves by Fast+Thick+Pants · · Score: 5, Funny

      Pretty long odds for the itchy trigger finger set... They'd soon get bored waiting and try to sweeten the pot.

      12:00 - leaving 4 grandmas, back in 2 weeks
      16:00 - plenty of beer in the fridge for when I get back tho, hope it doesn't get skunky
      18:00 - crap, left my rolex on the nitestand
      21:00 - crap, wife left her diamonds
      22:00 - crap, left the keys in the door
      22:30 - crap, left the keys in the truck too
      22:45 - crap, told the neighbor some moving guys were coming by around midnight

    2. Re:poor thieves by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Where can I sign up for your newsletter?

    3. Re:poor thieves by Archangel+Michael · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Personally I don't have a problem with this kind of thing. Really, I don't. Want to rob, consider it a hazardous conditions.

      I mean if someone wants to fuck with my stuff, then they have to fuck with me and my big guns. We shouldn't be protecting the asshats on the off chance that a drunk guy broken into my house accidentally, or it was a couple of stupid kids.

      Stupid should hurt. Criminals are stupid lazy asshats for the most part, who are antisocial to boot.

      I'm sick and tired of people who want to coddle the criminals while they are committing crimes. You breaking the law? Then you're responsible for what happens to you, and all that you do.

      Seriously, criminals shouldn't have rights while they are committing crimes.

      --
      Agent K: A *person* is smart. People are dumb, stupid, panicky animals, and you know it.
    4. Re:poor thieves by lwsimon · · Score: 3, Funny

      I think you were legal until 18:00 - then I think it qualifies as "hunting over bait".

      --
      Learn about Photography Basics.
    5. Re:poor thieves by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And I can also imagine when said thieves level their house using high explosives. After all, there was nobody home, right?

    6. Re:poor thieves by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      12:00 - leaving 4 grandmas, back in 2 weeks

      He left four grandmas at home? Surely noone would steal them.

    7. Re:poor thieves by jeffmeden · · Score: 1

      How is it any different than a watch store that advertises business hours of 9am-9pm? You know that noone is there... You know what they have inside... And yet no one blames the owners when the place gets knocked over after hours, nor would they if the owner happened to be inside and capable of defending himself.

    8. Re:poor thieves by petermgreen · · Score: 1

      How is it any different than a watch store that advertises business hours of 9am-9pm? You know that noone is there... You know what they have inside
      The watch store owner isn't lying to encourage burglers in. He is merely stating facts about his buisness.

      I don't know what if anything the law in various US states has to say on the matter but somehow I think the courts would take a dim view of deliberately luring someone into a deathtrap.

      --
      note: i'm known as plugwash most places but i screwd up registering that here somehow in the past and now can't register
  8. Specifically Twitter shouldn't be a problem... by calibre-not-output · · Score: 1

    but services like Facebook where less privacy-sensitive people might actually reveal where they live as well as when they aren't there... that's worrysome. Then again, they'd just be reaping what they sow - not that it justifies the robber, of course.

    --
    Nothing lasts forever but the certainty of change.
  9. Just because you can... by 2obvious4u · · Score: 4, Insightful

    doesn't mean you should.

    It is one thing for unscrupulous behavior to happen, it is another to encourage it. Their motives may be "pure" in that they are trying to bring awareness about what people know about you and what "could" happen. That doesn't mean it should happen. Not everyone is a crook and we should all strive to not be crooks, it is better for everyone. There used to be a time when everyone left there doors unlocked and trusted the community to not rob them. Now the community is encouraging people to rob people. The issue isn't people sharing their information, its people like these guys who are just being ass holes. We shouldn't have to hide our information, people should just respect each other enough not to steal their stuff.

    1. Re:Just because you can... by LMacG · · Score: 1

      And just because you can allow foursquare to barrage your friends with location updates (which is probably the default, based on what I've seen) doesn't mean you should. The issue isn't people sharing their information, it's people screaming "look at me, look at me".

      --
      Slightly disreputable, albeit gregarious
    2. Re:Just because you can... by mark-t · · Score: 1

      Of course, but endorsing the breaking of the law is also illegal...

      It's one thing to say that somebody else is out of town for a few days, it's quite another to actually recommend or suggest that somebody really rob his house while they are away.

    3. Re:Just because you can... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If it gets people to stop using that godforsaken service that pollutes up otherwise useful Twitter threads, I'm all for it.

    4. Re:Just because you can... by BrokenHalo · · Score: 2, Insightful

      We shouldn't have to hide our information, people should just respect each other enough not to steal their stuff.

      That would be a nice warm fuzzy world to live in, but the truth is that on this grossly overpopulated planet, we all HAVE to hide our personal information, because the world is just too full of asswipes to just pretend they don't exist.

    5. Re:Just because you can... by Jawn98685 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Sorry, this is definitely a case of "should". Clueless Twitter users (prepending "clueless" seems almost redundant...) who advertise to the world stuff that only a fool would advertise in any other medium need to have their noses rubbed in their own stupidity.

    6. Re:Just because you can... by cduffy · · Score: 2, Informative

      I haven't told Foursquare about my Twitter account, or about my Facebook account, or about anything else. I use it because some places I frequent offer discounts to customers who do; that's it.

      So -- by default, Foursquare can't talk to anything else; it's your friends who hook it up to Twitter and such who are being the asses.

    7. Re:Just because you can... by BJ_Covert_Action · · Score: 0, Troll

      We shouldn't have to hide our information, people should just respect each other enough not to steal their stuff.

      I think before people start respecting each other in society again, people need to start respecting themselves first. At least where I live (California), there seems to be a huge lack of self-respect and pride in folk today. It's embarrassing really.

    8. Re:Just because you can... by LMacG · · Score: 1

      Ah, thank you for that information. People aren't just being asshats inadvertantly, they doing it on purpose. Time to edit some lists, I think.

      --
      Slightly disreputable, albeit gregarious
    9. Re:Just because you can... by mcgrew · · Score: 1

      endorsing the breaking of the law is also illegal

      Then I'm breaking the law right now: I approve and endorse the sale, posession, and use of marijuana. First amendment? What's that?

    10. Re:Just because you can... by Otterley · · Score: 1

      "endorsing the breaking of the law is also illegal"

      It's not in the USA. Inciting violence is, however.

    11. Re:Just because you can... by gr8_phk · · Score: 1

      We shouldn't have to hide our information, people should just respect each other enough not to steal their stuff.

      We don't have to *hide* our information, but we should not broadcast it to the entire world either. You can tell your family and (hopefully) friends when you're going on vacation but you don't want to tell criminals that too. Face it, nobody outside the family and a few friends gives a shit when you're going away, so why do people feel the need to tell the whole world? Let's all post information that nobody but criminals really cares about.

      people should just respect each other enough not to steal their stuff.

      Nice idea, tell me when we get there. In the mean time, piece of iron went missing from my office - a relic from a past job, but someone else must have thought it looked interesting too. Yep, even the people you work with...

    12. Re:Just because you can... by pclminion · · Score: 1

      And here I was thinking the reason I don't rob and kill people was because I was a good person. Turns out, it's just because nobody has encouraged me to do those things. All this time I've been wrong! You've opened my eyes!

    13. Re:Just because you can... by Eil · · Score: 1

      Not everyone is a crook and we should all strive to not be crooks, it is better for everyone. There used to be a time when everyone left there doors unlocked and trusted the community to not rob them. [...] We shouldn't have to hide our information, people should just respect each other enough not to steal their stuff.

      Yes, yes, pining for the Norman Rockwell version of the 1950's is fun but in reality, the probability of having something stolen from you has never been zero. Some percentage of your neighbors are willing to steal from you no matter where (or when) you live. The only thing that stands in their way is opportunity. If they are able to go in and take something with a very low chance of being spotted or caught, they're going to try it. The rational response of a property owner is to take reasonable steps to secure his or her things to reduce the opportunity for theft, even if they overall relative risk seems low. These are some things that a rational person does not (or should not) do if they care at all about their security and know the consequences of them:

      * Go to the store and leave the garage door open
      * Give out your personal details to anyone who asks
      * Ask a stranger to hold your car keys
      * Set an empty or easily-guessed root password
      * Put your wallet down in a crowded area
      * Broadcast your exact whereabouts on Twitter

      If you do any of these things, don't act surprised at the consequences. Not that it would do any good anyway. The criminal has your data or property and you just look foolish for not protecting it. The problem here is that almost nobody using FourSquare understands the consequences of posting their exact physical location to the Internet at large because the media hasn't told them yet. Sometimes it takes a bold statement to get the media to pay attention to an underlying important message and it's hard to get any bolder than a site named pleaserobme.com. The site is just a pretty wrapper around something that's already available to criminals everywhere through Twitter itself. (Does mentioning that fact make me an asshole as well?)

      If this kind of thing is wrong, then where is the line drawn? If someone discovers a critical weakness in a popular encryption algorithm with too many vendors to enumerate let alone contact, is it wrong to describe it in public, even though criminals could make use of it to steal data? Doesn't everyone have the right to know that the security of their data is potentially in jeopardy? In forming my own answer, I'm reminded of the old security maxim: Sunlight is the best disinfectant.

  10. I forsee trouble for twitter by Shivetya · · Score: 1

    and companies providing location services as they are more likely to have money.

    --
    * Winners compare their achievements to their goals, losers compare theirs to that of others.
    1. Re:I forsee trouble for twitter by mea37 · · Score: 1

      Doubtful.

      Twitter advertises a service and provides the service at user request. They probably have a clause in their TOS that releases them from liability for indirect harm; while those kinds of term are often over-broad and partially unenforcable, this is pretty much exactly the kind of thing they're designed for: user does X using vendor's product/service, and an unintended consequence bites user in the rear.

      The folks with the Please Rob Me campaign probably aren't breaking any criminal laws (though I wouldn't be surprised to see an enterprising prosecutor come up with a conspiracy charge of some sort), but they are certainly risking civil liability, and they don't have any legal agreement with the victim to get them out of trouble.

  11. I don't understand the value of this to robbers by xZgf6xHx2uhoAj9D · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The site doesn't tell you whether everyone in the household is gone, only if one person in the household is gone. A robber would still have to peek in the windows and do whatever it is robbers do to make sure the house is empty. But they could do that just by walking around some random neighbourhood and peeking in random windows; they don't need Twitter to tell them to peek into someone's windows.

    1. Re:I don't understand the value of this to robbers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Anything + Web 2.0 == News

      You're welcome.

    2. Re:I don't understand the value of this to robbers by medv4380 · · Score: 1

      You're right but think of it this way. When some one must regularly go and drop off a bank deposit for their business the smart ones know to vary their routine that way someone is less likely to be able to setup a robbery. If you're tweeting your every move like "Having Tea at Ben & Jerrie's" then you're giving them the information that otherwise they would have to work for. This is really more then just robbing someones home in the end.

    3. Re:I don't understand the value of this to robbers by Arthur+Grumbine · · Score: 1

      The site doesn't tell you whether everyone in the household is gone, only if one person in the household is gone. A robber would still have to peek in the windows and do whatever it is robbers do to make sure the house is empty. But they could do that just by walking around some random neighbourhood and peeking in random windows; they don't need Twitter to tell them to peek into someone's windows.

      IDK, it seems like you could probably figure out whether a lot of tweeters live alone or not based their previous tweets.

      --
      Now that I think about it, I'm pretty sure everything I just said is completely wrong.
    4. Re:I don't understand the value of this to robbers by 99BottlesOfBeerInMyF · · Score: 1

      The site doesn't tell you whether everyone in the household is gone, only if one person in the household is gone. A robber would still have to peek in the windows and do whatever it is robbers do to make sure the house is empty.

      Maybe you're picturing robbers as guys dressed in black, wearing masks, twirling their mustaches, and carrying big sacks as a profession. Many times robbers are friends or acquaintances. They know who lives in your house and if they can check both your locations via twitter, they know they have a good shot at your house. A lot of robberies are done by people the victim has met who are opportunists. Heck, statistically, walking down the same jogging path as a burglar increases your chances of being burgled.

    5. Re:I don't understand the value of this to robbers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And which one is easier/less risky/more efficient for the robber?

    6. Re:I don't understand the value of this to robbers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      *knock knock*

      Housemate opens door. "Hello?"

      "Good morning, sir, I'm with $CHARITY, and we're looking for donations. Our truck will be coming through your neighborhood on $DATE, do you have anything to help the $NEEDY_POPULATION?"

      Housemate replies appropriately, burglar goes to the next house.

      *knock knock*

      Silence.

      *window smash, goodbye valuables*

    7. Re:I don't understand the value of this to robbers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      *knock knock*

      Housemate opens door. "Hello?"

      "Good morning, sir, I'm with $CHARITY, and we're looking for donations. Our truck will be coming through your neighborhood on $DATE, do you have anything to help the $NEEDY_POPULATION?"

      Housemate replies appropriately, burglar goes to the next house.

      *knock knock*

      Silence.

      *window smash, goodbye valuables*

      *click-clack* BOOM!!
      *click-clack* BOOM!!

      *dial tone*
      *ringing*

      "Hello 911. What is your emergency."

      "No emergency. Someone forced entry to my home and I shot them to death with a twelve gauge. Just send a meat wagon."

    8. Re:I don't understand the value of this to robbers by xZgf6xHx2uhoAj9D · · Score: 1

      That's a really good point! You could have an acquaintance (you don't really like the guy, but hang out with him, know his living situation). Him posting to the world that he's going to be out of town for the next couple days could be tipping point.

    9. Re:I don't understand the value of this to robbers by lwsimon · · Score: 1

      WTF? You don't keep one in the chamber?

      Or perhaps you've been playing too much CounterStrike, and ejected the first round for the sound effect? :)

      --
      Learn about Photography Basics.
    10. Re:I don't understand the value of this to robbers by toastar · · Score: 1

      *knock knock*

      Housemate opens door. "Hello?"

      "Good morning, sir, I'm with $CHARITY, and we're looking for donations. Our truck will be coming through your neighborhood on $DATE, do you have anything to help the $NEEDY_POPULATION?"

      Housemate replies appropriately, burglar goes to the next house.

      *knock knock*

      Silence.

      *window smash, goodbye valuables*

      *click-clack* BOOM!!
      *click-clack* BOOM!!

      *dial tone*
      *ringing*

      "Hello 911. What is your emergency."

      "No emergency. Someone forced entry to my home and I shot them to death with a twelve gauge. Just send a meat wagon."

      This is how we deal with robberies down here intexas, That way it frees up more cops to harass wet backs and black folk minding they're own business.

    11. Re:I don't understand the value of this to robbers by Mishotaki · · Score: 1

      WTF? You don't keep one in the chamber?

      Or perhaps you've been playing too much CounterStrike, and ejected the first round for the sound effect? :)

      or maybe he doesn't want the kids to shoot themselves if they pull the trigger when they play around with the gun while daddy isn't home...

    12. Re:I don't understand the value of this to robbers by lwsimon · · Score: 1

      Wow, you know the anonymous guy has kids. And the gun isn't out of their reach. And it isn't in a locked upright cabinet. And he leaves it sitting out when he isn't home. And he leaves his kids home alone with the gun out.

      You're a fucking psychic, what are you doing on Slashdot when you could be picking stocks?

      --
      Learn about Photography Basics.
    13. Re:I don't understand the value of this to robbers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      All that unfortunately isn't a terrible stretch of imagination. People are incredibly stupid about firearms :\

    14. Re:I don't understand the value of this to robbers by NeoSkandranon · · Score: 1

      I gotta ask: was "they're" intentional?

      --
      If you can't see the value in jet powered ants you should turn in your nerd card. - Dunbal (464142)
    15. Re:I don't understand the value of this to robbers by DerekLyons · · Score: 1

      The site doesn't tell you whether everyone in the household is gone, only if one person in the household is gone. A robber would still have to peek in the windows and do whatever it is robbers do to make sure the house is empty. But they could do that just by walking around some random neighbourhood and peeking in random windows

      You miss the point. A thief wandering a random neighborhood peeking in random windows is rolling the dice hoping for a natural 100. A thief using tweets, status updates, etc... is using loaded dice. He has a much higher chance of rolling a 'natural' 100.
       

      they don't need Twitter to tell them to peek into someone's windows.

      No, they don't 'need' Twitter. Nor do I 'need' to use Google to look up what I could find by getting in my car, driving down to the library, and then poring through the indexes of half a dozen books after using the card catalog to locate those books.
       
      But Twitter and Google make both of our lives a hell of a lot easier.

    16. Re:I don't understand the value of this to robbers by lwsimon · · Score: 1

      People are incredibly stupid, period. My point was that having a gun with an empty chamber severely limits its use for self-defense, while it does very little to prevent its use by children.

      If I kid is old enough to play with the gun, they can surely manage to cycle the action. Also, it is incredibly hard to accidentally shoot yourself with a shotgun. You have to really work at it, and use your toe or something else to pull the trigger.

      Sure, the kid could shoot someone else, but Mishotaki didn't suggest that. I'm pointing out that the stupidity about firearms gos both ways. Just as there are people dumb enough to leave young children alone with access to loaded firearms, there are people dumb enough to wet themselves with the thought of a gun getting up by itself and starting to shoot people.

      There is a middle ground here, and its called repsonsibility. Someone irresponsibile enough to end up with a kid shooting a gun unattended is irresponsible enough to let them hurt themselves or others in a myriad of ways. Therefore, the gun is not the issue, but the parent is.

      --
      Learn about Photography Basics.
    17. Re:I don't understand the value of this to robbers by ThatsNotPudding · · Score: 1

      A robber would still have to peek in the windows...

      This is why my Roomba constantly projects a hologram of Chuck Norris.

    18. Re:I don't understand the value of this to robbers by sorak · · Score: 1

      When one person is on vacation, the rest of the household is likely to be gone as well. to a cautious criminal, this is no substitute for a more through examination, but it would indicate which houses are best to examine.

  12. You can question their methods... by Ltap · · Score: 4, Insightful

    But if this raises awareness, full steam ahead. People need to figure out that if they have minute-by-minute updates of where they are and what they are doing, all of which is publically available, they will sooner or later have consequences.

    Moreso than robberies: I'm surprised we don't have rapes because of this, i.e. a girl tweeting while drunk.

    --
    Yet Another Tech Blog
    (but so much more, including game and movie reviews)
    http://yanteb.peasantoid.org
    1. Re:You can question their methods... by geminidomino · · Score: 5, Funny

      Moreso than robberies: I'm surprised we don't have rapes because of this, i.e. a girl tweeting while drunk.

      I'm sure I'll be condemned to insensitive robot hell for this, but when I read that, my first thought was:

      Q: What's the blonde mating call?
      A: I'm SOOOOOOOOOO wasted.

    2. Re:You can question their methods... by FlyingBishop · · Score: 1

      Most rapes aren't reported. It's probably already happened quite a bit.

    3. Re:You can question their methods... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Q: What's the mating call of the ugly blonde?

      A: I SAID, I'm SOOOOOOOOO wasted!

    4. Re:You can question their methods... by mcgrew · · Score: 2, Funny

      Q: How does a blonde turn on the light after sex?
      A: she opens the door

    5. Re:You can question their methods... by geminidomino · · Score: 1

      Q: What's the mating call of a brunette?
      A: Has that fucking blonde left yet?

    6. Re:You can question their methods... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My twitter automatically updates that I'm taking a huge dump every two hours with my location at home :D It even uploads a photo. And who says I take dumps in the bathroom?

    7. Re:You can question their methods... by BitZtream · · Score: 1

      Slip her an ambien, wait 30 minutes, she won't remember any of it. 2 or 3 ambien if she's sober.

      Its surely already happened with more traditional date rape drugs anyway.

      --
      Persistent Volume manager for Kubernetes - https://github.com/dwimsey/openshift-pvmanager
    8. Re:You can question their methods... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I may be having a blonde moment of my own, but are you insinuating blondes have sex in the refrigerator?

    9. Re:You can question their methods... by mcgrew · · Score: 1

      That was priceless, thanks! Have you heard A Child's garden of Grass -- a Pre-Legalization Comedy?

      No, not the fridge, in the back seat of a car.

  13. Honeypot by srussia · · Score: 1

    It's just like those "bait cars" the cops use.

    --
    Set your phasers on "funky"!
    1. Re:Honeypot by WormholeFiend · · Score: 1

      Not sure if it would be an effective honeypot... you still have to be home, or have someone watching it, all the while making sure your home looks like there's no one in it.

      And you don't even know if your home will be targeted by a thief.

      Now if those subscription home surveillance systems actually worked instead of being scams, it might work...

    2. Re:Honeypot by Lumpy · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I just wish the bait cars were full of explosives.

      Honestly, Blow up a few car jackers or car thieves and make it REALLY public and suddenly car thefts will go way down.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    3. Re:Honeypot by gandhi_2 · · Score: 1

      How about a victim-initiated HBIED?

    4. Re:Honeypot by justinlee37 · · Score: 1

      The cops wouldn't use a home that had people actually LIVING in it as a honeypot. The liability risk would be insane. No, they'd rent an apartment themselves and keep it vacant and under surveillance.

    5. Re:Honeypot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      I just wish the bait cars were full of explosives.

      Honestly, Blow up a few car jackers or car thieves and make it REALLY public and suddenly car thefts will go way down.

      I'm fairly sure this even if you side step the constitutional protection for due process, this form of summary corporal punishment and/or execution would be considered cruel and unusual punishment.

    6. Re:Honeypot by XxtraLarGe · · Score: 1

      I just wish the bait cars were full of explosives. Honestly, Blow up a few car jackers or car thieves and make it REALLY public and suddenly car thefts will go way down.

      Probably wouldn't work so well for innocent bystanders though.

      --
      Taking guns away from the 99% gives the 1% 100% of the power.
    7. Re:Honeypot by Gizzmonic · · Score: 1

      In Austin, the cops parked a bait car with the keys in the ignition in front of someone's house. The back seat was filled with porno mags and lingerie. The people who owned the house did not know it was a bait car, and called the police about it several times. The police did not respond. After a few weeks, they got sick of having the car in front of their house, so the owner of the house started the car and tried to move it to a parking lot where it would get towed. He was arrested and charged with grand theft auto within minutes.

      I don't know how such a blatant form of entrapment is even legal. And attracting criminals into neighborhoods sounds like the opposite of what cops should be doing anyway.

      --
      (-1, Raw and Uncut is the only way to read)
    8. Re:Honeypot by lwsimon · · Score: 1

      I believe GTA involves intent - any decent lawyer should be able to get them off the hook for that, then counter-sue.

      --
      Learn about Photography Basics.
    9. Re:Honeypot by colinrichardday · · Score: 1

      Couldn't they have had it towed instead?

    10. Re:Honeypot by Lumpy · · Score: 1

      typically car thieves dont like having crowds cheering them on while they work. the "innocent bystanders" are typically outside the blast radius.

      I'm not asking for 800 pounds of high explosives that level a 3 block area. I'm looking to simply spread the thief's DNA over a 30 yard diameter... ALL his dna.....

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    11. Re:Honeypot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Shoulda put it in neutral and gave it a push.

    12. Re:Honeypot by CorporateSuit · · Score: 1

      But what about the guy who turns off the engine and leaves a post-it with the words "Give a hoot! Don't pollute!"?

      --
      I am the richest astronaut ever to win the superbowl.
    13. Re:Honeypot by billybacs · · Score: 1

      It's not entrapment if the opportunity exists; it's entrapment if the person commits a crime they would not have committed without interference from the cops. I said this on another thread the other day: a cop telling you to get into a car and drive off with it would be entrapment. A cop leaving a car unlocked in case any opportunist decides he wants an easy-to-steal car is that "honeypot". The person wasn't influenced by the cops to commit a crime.

    14. Re:Honeypot by Gizzmonic · · Score: 1

      They were enticed by the cops' inaction to get into the car. And I was wrong, he did not drive the car-he just tried to jimmy open the trunk. But his neighbor drove it a block-again, after the cops were unresponsive-and he was charged with a felony.

      Bait cars are such blatant entrapment it's not even funny. Not to mention, leaving a motor vehicle unattended with a key in it is a felony in and of itself in Texas.

      --
      (-1, Raw and Uncut is the only way to read)
    15. Re:Honeypot by billybacs · · Score: 1

      It simply isn't entrapment, though. The cops are dicks and this case should be thrown out anyway, since (to me) it makes perfect sense that he wanted the car gone. He did call the cops, and they should have simply moved it to a new location. While technically he did commit a felony, given the circumstances I don't think he'll be convicted of anything. I didn't know that leaving keys in the ignition is a felony in TX. Lots of people up here do that, but granted it's in people's driveways if they're running in and out. I see cops leave their cruisers with the keys on ALL THE TIME though, so go figure.

  14. really a good idea? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    good idea but i cant help but think this is going to be a catalyst for the "first twitter robbery"

    1. Re:really a good idea? by Thud457 · · Score: 4, Funny

      oh, ghod, no, please, not "twobbery" . It's enough to make one give up the English language.

      --

      the preceding comment is my own and in no way reflects the opinion of the Joint Chiefs of Staff

    2. Re:really a good idea? by Gothmolly · · Score: 5, Funny

      He wanks as high as any in Wome !!!

      --
      I want to delete my account but Slashdot doesn't allow it.
  15. And when it happens by MikeRT · · Score: 1, Interesting

    There won't even be bones for their families to bury by the time the lawyers, both prosecutors and trial lawyers, are done with them for aiding and abetting this if the robber used their app. This is so stupid that it would make running a mirror of The Pirate Bay in the middle of Hollywood look slightly intelligent by comparison.

    1. Re:And when it happens by Courageous · · Score: 1

      It's actionable in the US, even without the robbery. If my house were up there, and they were HQ'd in the US (they are not), I'd sue them immediately. This would be worth a good six figures.

    2. Re:And when it happens by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This just highlights how bad the american system is.

      take some responsibilty for your own actions rather than suing someone for a change

    3. Re:And when it happens by berashith · · Score: 1

      Would you really be willing to go in front of a judge to argue that the information that you posted for the entire world to see was relayed by this site to, well, the entire world?

      Just because you did it at twitter.com and they displayed it at pleaserobme, the outcome is the same. If there site was called idiotsadvertisedumbthings.com , would they be less intrusive to your home. I dont think that they are really helping robbers, but calling attention to what information is there.

      It is not like they are running a fencing service for cat burglars.

    4. Re:And when it happens by Courageous · · Score: 1

      You mean don't deliberately harass others and cause them emotional distress? Yeah, I'm with you on that. While there is plenty wrong with the American system, this isn't one of the broken parts.

      C//

    5. Re:And when it happens by Courageous · · Score: 1

      Would you really be willing to go in front of a judge to argue that the information that you posted for the entire world to see was relayed by this site to, well, the entire world?

      Yes. The case is a slam dunk.

      C//

    6. Re:And when it happens by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So in the US,

      1. Post your information online, including your SSN, where you are via GPS updates every minute
      2. Someone says it's stupid
      3. Profit!!

      I guess another reason NEVER to base yourself or your company in the US, even if you are a US citizen.

    7. Re:And when it happens by clone53421 · · Score: 1

      Um, no, you made the information public by posting it on twitter. I suppose you might be able to claim there was copyright infringement if they copied your tweet directly, but even so the information contained in the tweet was freely available to the public.

      Twitter updates don’t come with a disclaimer saying “...but you can’t tell anyone this”. (And if they did, it wouldn’t be enforceable.)

      --
      Alexander Peter Kristopeit bought his basement from his mommy for one dollar.
    8. Re:And when it happens by xero314 · · Score: 1

      Making it easier to find information, that you already provided, is not harassing anyone. And if aggregation of data on the internet causes you emotional stress I would suggest staying off the internet and seeking professional help.

      The website being discussed simply provides an aggregate of information already available. Aggregating freely available data should not be a crime.

    9. Re:And when it happens by Courageous · · Score: 1

      I hope you don't act on your beliefs in a fashion similar to the website in question. You'll be requiring an attorney quickly.

      Hint: I am not wrong.

      C//

    10. Re:And when it happens by Courageous · · Score: 1

      This is not "making it easier to find information," as you said. This is a case of public invitation to do the aggregated parties harm. If you think you can get away with this under the banner of information aggregation, god help you. You will quickly finding yourself requiring civil litigation representation, and will be lucky if you don't encounter a criminal complaint.

      This conversation is stupid. Don't believe me, ask someone who practices law.

      C//

    11. Re:And when it happens by clone53421 · · Score: 1

      If you want to try to find some evidence to back up your stupid claim, go ahead.

      --
      Alexander Peter Kristopeit bought his basement from his mommy for one dollar.
    12. Re:And when it happens by xero314 · · Score: 1

      Please note that I said "this should not be a crime." I never said it was not a crime. I was simply pointing out how fundamentally flawed it is to support the idea that this should be a crime.

      But I should probably drop it since I'm obviously deliberately harassing you and causing you emotional stress. Good thing I'm careful about posting personal information on public forums.

    13. Re:And when it happens by Courageous · · Score: 1

      Yes, because if I found your address and started a web site with your address prominently posted along with the request to "PLEASE KILL YOU," we know you would be okay with that, and think that having any legal recourse in such a case is just proof that we are a society of sissies.

      *chortle*

      C//

    14. Re:And when it happens by Courageous · · Score: 1

      I actually have an attorney. If there is some fashion whereby you can trustably prove to me the ability to remit to me the attorney hours for consult to determine what I already know to be true, go ahead.

      As it is, if you think you are right, go ahead and start a web site like the quoted right here domestically in the U.S. Prepare for bankruptcy, and quite possibly JAIL.

      C//

    15. Re:And when it happens by clone53421 · · Score: 1

      And why would I pay your attorney fees to have your attorney tell you what I already know?

      --
      Alexander Peter Kristopeit bought his basement from his mommy for one dollar.
    16. Re:And when it happens by xero314 · · Score: 1

      Here is what I can say about that. If you access publicly available information, or better yet information I freely released to the public, and without offering any incentive, be it monetary compensation or false statements, requested that someone commit the murder of me, then I would have absolutely no reason to seek legal recourse (whether I had any legal ground for that recourse or not).

      If someone randomly walked up to me and said, "punch the next person you see", and I followed through, then it would be my own doing. I'm sorry you think people are so weak minded that they can be so easily manipulated and controlled. I could not imagine living with such paranoid ideation.

    17. Re:And when it happens by Courageous · · Score: 1

      If you think you can post even one name and address with a suggestion to rob them, ... well, the mind staggers. Such an act could cost you YOUR HOUSE. It is both a) criminal harassment, and b) incitement. Since the act is a CRIME, it is actionable per se.

      Since you already know it, and are obviously feeling brave, what I meant was conditionally. I'll happily send you the attorney letterhead explaining the matter to you, if and only if I am correct, if and only if you pay for it.

      But really. Don't you think you should do some elementary legal research on your own. I HAVE-- hint hint.

      C//

    18. Re:And when it happens by clone53421 · · Score: 1

      If you think you can post even one name and address with a suggestion to rob them, ... well, the mind staggers.

      That isn’t what I’d do, though. I’d say “so-and-so said he’s out of town right now... on the internet no less... readable by millions of people. How stupid can you be... doesn’t he know that someone could burglarize his house now?” I’m just repeating what he said, with some appropriate commentary on his stupidity.

      --
      Alexander Peter Kristopeit bought his basement from his mommy for one dollar.
    19. Re:And when it happens by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This conversation is stupid. Don't believe me, ask someone who practices law.

      Didn't GP (I'm not him) just say "the law is an ass" or words to that effect? Everyone with half a brain knows that once you put something on (a public part of) the internet, you have no control over it and you shouldn't count on it going away or not being aggregated. If you don't want people knowing that you won't be home, don't tell them on a public part of the internet. Privacy is only for those who want it, and any attempt by the law to intercede on this front is heavy-handed and spits in the eye of the innumerable legitimate corner cases (as well as people's natural responsibility to face consequences for their behaviour).

    20. Re:And when it happens by Courageous · · Score: 1

      "Please Rob Me" is not a good introduction to your manner of discussing the matter, don't you think?

      C//

    21. Re:And when it happens by Courageous · · Score: 1

      Most everyone accepts that the phone book puts their name and address in the white pages, but most everyone does not expect to be personally singled out and harassed because of it.

      C//

    22. Re:And when it happens by clone53421 · · Score: 1

      It is obviously a joke, not meant to be taken seriously.

      They are not asking anyone to rob the idiots who are featured on the site... merely pointing out that if someone were to do so, it would be sweet irony (in the tragic sense).

      --
      Alexander Peter Kristopeit bought his basement from his mommy for one dollar.
    23. Re:And when it happens by Courageous · · Score: 1

      Would you feel the same way if the site were "Please Rape Me" and it singled out girls who stupidly mentioned they were home alone? You know, "this is a joke," "all in good fun," "it's funny, isn't it?" What would your wife or girlfriend think about that? Why not give her an ask and find out? Ask her what she would think about you if you were to personally sponsor such a web site.

      A "joke" at a stranger's expense, in this format, is still harassment. It's a gross lack of empathy and decency. It's actionable, and should be actionable. It's a crime, and should be a crime. The point could be gotten across with fictional accounts, not real ones. The singling out of actual individuals is tasteless and insensitive under the best of interpretations.

      Your gut instinct is that because they were stupid, they "deserve" to be treated inhumanely. That gut instinct is a poor one. Rethink it.

      C//

    24. Re:And when it happens by clone53421 · · Score: 1

      Would you feel the same way if the site were "Please Rape Me" and it singled out girls who stupidly mentioned they were home alone?

      More or less. And I’d hope that anyone who actually tried taking advantage of one of the featured girls got shot in the process. Letting people know you’re home alone is only a slightly poor judgment if you’re able and know how to defend yourself, but breaking into someone’s house is stupid under any circumstances.

      There are more decent people than there are burglars and rapists. If one person went down the list and sent a message to every person whose tweet showed up on that site telling them, uh, you might want to think twice about putting this sort of information in public... the site would do much more good than harm. In any case, it’s just filtering existing information from a public website. Burglars and rapists could, with only marginally more trouble, get the same information from Twitter. That’s the whole point.

      If some burglar used Google to search for site:twitter.com "on vacation", would you say that Google should be criminally liable?

      --
      Alexander Peter Kristopeit bought his basement from his mommy for one dollar.
    25. Re:And when it happens by clone53421 · · Score: 1

      Also, from their “Why” page:

      The danger is publicly telling people where you are. This is because it leaves one place you're definitely not... home. So here we are; on one end we're leaving lights on when we're going on a holiday, and on the other we're telling everybody on the internet we're not home. It gets even worse if you have "friends" who want to colonize your house. That means they have to enter your address, to tell everyone where they are. Your address.. on the internet.. Now you know what to do when people reach for their phone as soon as they enter your home. That's right, slap them across the face.

      The goal of this website is to raise some awareness on this issue and have people think about how they use services like Foursquare, Brightkite, Google Buzz etc. Because all this site is, is a dressed up Twitter search page. Everybody can get this information.

      And at the bottom of every page:

      Our intention is not, and never has been, to have people burgled.

      --
      Alexander Peter Kristopeit bought his basement from his mommy for one dollar.
    26. Re:And when it happens by Courageous · · Score: 1

      No more than the white pages, for listing addresses. However, if someone picked 10 addresses out of the white pages, and posted "please rob these addresses" in print, I'd say, yes, the would be criminally liable.

      Single out individuals, even when the information is public--uncool, unethical, immmoral, and wrong.

      C//

  16. HR Managers should stop smiling by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Basically, there's nothing wrong with the technology. The defect comes with the users. People are unreliable and untrustworthy. If people weren't such assholes I wouldn't mind letting everybody know my sexual habits, or even my fantasies. But there are spoilers out there; the type of people who say I have a bad attitude are also the same type of people who steal staple removers at the office and use "private" data for personal gain. The backstabbers are the people who smile a lot and are heavily into "family values" and "morality". I once heard a psychologist say that people in prison are more likely to be Conservative in there beliefs (by being pro-death penalty, pro-capital punishment and anti-crime) then people who are not in prison. Average, normal people tend to be irrational.

  17. How long? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I thought this has already happened a few times in the United States. Im at work so I cant research for it though.

    This is yet another reason I don't use a number of the social networking services. Just like the one which shows your location to your friends. Unless I am lost in some massive state park, I see no use. And if you going to say that "Only those who you want to see you profile can" (regardless of social service), who's to say that one of your "friends" robs you. Just dont see the practical point in most of these services.

  18. The reverse side is: by Theoboley · · Score: 1

    You could always make a fake post stating you're going out of town for a night, then wait and see if someone shows up. Arm yourself with a ball bat and claim self defense.

    Sounds a bit premeditated.

    --
    Stupidity only gets you so far, then you've gotta try
    1. Re:The reverse side is: by XxtraLarGe · · Score: 1

      You could always make a fake post stating you're going out of town for a night, then wait and see if someone shows up. Arm yourself with a ball bat and claim self defense.

      The problem with that is you don't manually update your location info, that's done automatically by the site based on your IP info. Now, you could give someone else your phone or laptop to tweet with, but then you'd have a hard time explaining that.

      --
      Taking guns away from the 99% gives the 1% 100% of the power.
    2. Re:The reverse side is: by Dunbal · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Now, you could give someone else your phone or laptop to tweet with, but then you'd have a hard time explaining that.

            Why? Is it suddenly illegal to lend someone in another state/country your telephone? Is there a law stating that everything you write on the internet must be "the truth the whole truth and nothing but the truth"? You can't invite someone into your house and then bash them over the head in "self defense". However if they force entry, it really doesn't matter WHAT you wrote. IANAL but I assume that the law draws a line at the point where the guy actually takes a crowbar to your front door. "He made me do it" doesn't work. You can't take break into people's houses unless you have a damned good reason that will convince a judge and jury, like a firefighter trying to save someone's life or property.

      --
      Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
    3. Re:The reverse side is: by Theoboley · · Score: 1

      As i don't use Twitter, I was unaware of this. Color me Ignorant, it's a pretty shade of DERRRR.

      --
      Stupidity only gets you so far, then you've gotta try
    4. Re:The reverse side is: by iamhassi · · Score: 1

      Whaaa?! You haven't heard of the famous "He was suppose to be out of town!" defense? It's awesome, you should try it: break into any home when the homeowner is there, and if they hurt you in any way just tell the judge you read or heard he was out of town and sue for damages. You'll get millions, makes perfect sense.

      --
      my karma will be here long after I'm gone
    5. Re:The reverse side is: by XxtraLarGe · · Score: 1

      Why? Is it suddenly illegal to lend someone in another state/country your telephone? Is there a law stating that everything you write on the internet must be "the truth the whole truth and nothing but the truth"? You can't invite someone into your house and then bash them over the head in "self defense". However if they force entry, it really doesn't matter WHAT you wrote. IANAL but I assume that the law draws a line at the point where the guy actually takes a crowbar to your front door. "He made me do it" doesn't work. You can't take break into people's houses unless you have a damned good reason that will convince a judge and jury, like a firefighter trying to save someone's life or property.

      I'm not arguing against anybody's right to self defense, but it seems to me that you're probably going to open yourself up to some challenges you might not have gotten into if you didn't bait the criminal. Some states will make you liable for using force if it can be shown that you could have escaped instead. Not saying it's right, but saying that's what it is.

      --
      Taking guns away from the 99% gives the 1% 100% of the power.
    6. Re:The reverse side is: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's pretty trivial to write up a little script to use twitter API to post the info and have it look like it's coming from a geo-aware app.

      Also the point of the site isn't just about geo apps. Just going posting to twitter yourself that you're away from home is just as dangerous/stupid.

    7. Re:The reverse side is: by i.r.id10t · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Unless you live in a state that has a castle doctrine...

      --
      Don't blame me, I voted for Kodos
    8. Re:The reverse side is: by NevarMore · · Score: 1

      Dead men don't testify

    9. Re:The reverse side is: by atomic-penguin · · Score: 1

      I think the parent poster was being sarcastic.

      --
      /^([Ss]ame [Bb]at (time, |channel.)){2}$/
    10. Re:The reverse side is: by StikyPad · · Score: 1

      I do. Strangely, killing our fellow man is acceptable under several circumstances here, but marrying our fellow man is illegal under any, because it doesn't.. promote.. population growth? I forget the argument du jour.

    11. Re:The reverse side is: by gr8_phk · · Score: 1

      Strangely, killing our fellow man is acceptable under several circumstances here, but marrying our fellow man is illegal under any, because it doesn't.. promote.. population growth?

      Actually, it does. Encouraging those type of relationships keeps those folks from getting into sexless conventional relationships with straight people who might otherwise reproduce. i.e. more women for the rest of us.

  19. Hmmm...listen closely... by geemon · · Score: 1

    I hear insurance scammers quietly whispering about new schemes throughout the US about how to use this to their benefit.

    1. Re:Hmmm...listen closely... by natehoy · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I hear insurance companies quietly whispering about new schemes to monitor their customer's twitterfeeds and deny claims based on homeowner liability.

      --
      "This post contains words, known to the State of California to cause thought. Wash brain thoroughly after reading."
    2. Re:Hmmm...listen closely... by dcw3 · · Score: 1

      Ok, I'm going to have to look at my policy, but I'm fairly certain that even if I left the front door wide open, and was robbed, that the insurance company would be liable to pick up the expenses minus my deductable. y experts out there?

      Regarding some earlier comments...
      I know people are exposing themselves (don't twist those words) to anyone who cares to follow their breadcrumb trail. But there are plenty of homes with alarm systems, big dogs, and other inhabitants. I'm fortunate enough to live in a neighborhood where anyone casing the place long enough to find a pattern would likely have already had their license number, turned in to the local police...the neighbors watch out for each other, and let each other know when we're away for longer periods.

      --
      Just another day in Paradise
    3. Re:Hmmm...listen closely... by natehoy · · Score: 1

      Actually, I was going for a +5 funny. No one was more surprised than myself at it being a +5 insightful.

      However, having thought about it a bit more...

      I haven't read my policy, but it actually may be analogous to theft on auto insurance policies. My mother's car was stolen once and totalled, and the people who did it could not be prosecuted (and my mother was denied her insurance claim) because she had left the keys in it while she went inside the back door of the family business to grab some paperwork. The insurance company and police only considered it "theft" when forced entry takes place.

      So, in insurance and prosecution terms, leaving your keys in your car turns the car into a freely-available resource. Leaving it unlocked means that anything in it can be freely taken. It may still technically be illegal, but it's not prosecutable.

      Top tip: If your car is stolen and you recover it with significant damage, it's probably prudent to take a crowbar and smash a window, then rip out the keyhole and hotwire it. Just so there are signs of forced entry. If my insurance agent is reading this, I'm joking of course!

      This may or may not translate to an insurance company being able to say "you share liability because you told people your house was an easy target." I very much doubt it would hold up, as long as your house was locked at least.

      --
      "This post contains words, known to the State of California to cause thought. Wash brain thoroughly after reading."
    4. Re:Hmmm...listen closely... by cpscotti · · Score: 2, Funny

      Insightful is the new Funny.

    5. Re:Hmmm...listen closely... by natehoy · · Score: 1

      I've posted, so I can't use mod points on this.

      If I did, I'd have to decide.. insightful or funny?

      Dammit, I'm glad I can't use my mod points on that, because my head would explode trying to decide.

      --
      "This post contains words, known to the State of California to cause thought. Wash brain thoroughly after reading."
    6. Re:Hmmm...listen closely... by mlts · · Score: 1

      This is not just auto, and this is why I *highly* recommend people get high security locks on the doors of their house. If someone can't pick an Abloy PROTEC and kicks down the door, this leaves an obvious signature that there was a break-in. However, if someone successfully picks a lock, it is a lot harder to prove that an intrusion took place.

      At the minimum, I recommend people consider something like Kwikset Smartkey locks. These use a sidebar and can be picked if given enough time and effort, but someone with a bump key isn't going to be able to pop it open in seconds.

      Best of all worlds would be to get some solid high security locks (Medeco, Schlage Primus, Abloy PROTEC, Mul-T-Lock MT5, etc.) High security cylinders don't just provide pick resistance, but they also help ensure that keys don't get copied without some effort, and tend to work better on a day to day basis due to tighter tolerances and better materials used.

    7. Re:Hmmm...listen closely... by BitZtream · · Score: 1

      And honestly, if they showed a history of being a moron and letting this information out, than I'd be okay with them denying a claim. If you announce to the world when your house is ready to be robbed, you deserve to have all your stuff taken away from you.

      --
      Persistent Volume manager for Kubernetes - https://github.com/dwimsey/openshift-pvmanager
    8. Re:Hmmm...listen closely... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      By this logic, couldn't you use a "chain" or "bar" style lock? They may be trivial to defeat, but not without damaging them. Also, where I live (a warm-ish climate with not too much crime), a lot (I'd say most) houses have glass doors somewhere. Surely a (non-cat-)burgler would prefer to just smash the window over picking a lock, even if it's trivial to defeat?

  20. erm, obvious flaws by hypergreatthing · · Score: 1

    Wouldn't this only work on single person households where that single person twitters all day long?

    1. Re:erm, obvious flaws by RobertB-DC · · Score: 1

      Wouldn't this only work on single person households where that single person twitters all day long?

      That's a feature, not a bug. The person you described probably has a house full of expensive computer, networking, and video equipment. Plus, with just the one person, when they're gone, there's nobody else going to be dropping in. It's perfect... unless, of course, the tech-head is also a gun nut, and is only *pretending* to go out for a night on the town with some hot babe. As if. If the thief actually believes *that* post, he deserves what he gets.

      --
      Stressed? Me? Of course not. Stress is what a rubber band feels before it breaks, silly.
    2. Re:erm, obvious flaws by Asic+Eng · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but the tool doesn't tell you if the house is just occupied by the person doing the twittering, right? So just because it tells you "this person is not at home, rob them" doesn't mean the person is single, or that the house is empty. There could still be the luddite roommate who collects guns as a hobby.

  21. Funny Webcomic on this Topic by Abdul+the+Newt · · Score: 0

    At the risk of web whoring (I hope this isn't considered that, because I'm on topic), I posted a webcomic on this topic today at www.lunatechfringe.com. I'd just post the comic directly but I don't think there's a way to attach images.

    --
    Webcomics Posted Monday-Friday http://www.lunatechfringe.com
    1. Re:Funny Webcomic on this Topic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Let me help you with that.

      Two robbers in front of a house, one on the lookout, one trying to open a window with a crowbar. Lookout-guy: "You sure this is cool?" Window-guy: "No worries. They're on vacation and just posted from Guatemala."

      Haha.

      Also, seeing text like "clearly they’re dialect places the one from Down Under" on your page, I'd say that your choice of a visual medium was a wise decision.

    2. Re:Funny Webcomic on this Topic by XxtraLarGe · · Score: 1

      I don't think you should be modded down, but you could have just posted the link the site using an HREF tag, and that probably would have been looked upon more favorably.

      --
      Taking guns away from the 99% gives the 1% 100% of the power.
  22. first web broadcast murder... by VShael · · Score: 1

    If I give my phone to someone else, then sit at home with my webcam streaming to the web, and a gun....

    Can I kill an intruder in legitimate self defence while it happens to be broadcasting to the web?

    1. Re:first web broadcast murder... by mxh83 · · Score: 1

      Let us know how that goes for you.

    2. Re:first web broadcast murder... by iamhassi · · Score: 1

      Only if you post the URL to /. so we can watch

      --
      my karma will be here long after I'm gone
    3. Re:first web broadcast murder... by uncledrax · · Score: 1

      Sure. But you said it yourself, Legitimate self defense.

      You cannot legally pay someone to break into your house (so you can lie in wait and shoot them).

      If you say you're going on vacation, and someone breaks into your house, and you have legitimate cause to execute deadly force in your own defense ("legitimate" varies by state/local law), then yes.
      If you webcam your entry way 24/7 in the offchance you get to shoot someone, so be it.. you probably open yourself up to get reamed by a Wrongful Death suit though; but there's reasonable cause for you to be in fear of your life and defend yourself with lethal force, you can probably get out of going to jail.

      --
      ----- The internet has given everyone the ability to have their voice heard equally as loud.. even if they shouldn't be
  23. Fortunately for me by XxtraLarGe · · Score: 1

    I always set bear traps in my house when I'm out of town. Take that, PleaseRobMe.com!

    --
    Taking guns away from the 99% gives the 1% 100% of the power.
    1. Re:Fortunately for me by Courageous · · Score: 1

      I know you're just kidding, but did you know that's illegal?

    2. Re:Fortunately for me by iamhassi · · Score: 1

      That doesn't sound.... oh I thought you said beer traps, my bad

      --
      my karma will be here long after I'm gone
    3. Re:Fortunately for me by oh-dark-thirty · · Score: 1

      They could always just say "Your honor, I was having a problem with stray bears entering the house when I was away, so I set some traps. It never occurred to me that another human would enter a house that wasn't their own.". Plausible deniability, I say.

    4. Re:Fortunately for me by SuiteSisterMary · · Score: 1

      Knowing that I was going to be out of the house for a few days, I decided to get around to testing these bear traps. Some of them, the locking mechanism goes. The trap doesn't stay open, just randomly snaps shut. Now, I don't want to go all the way out into the woods and set these traps if they're not going to stay open. But the only way to test them is to leave them open for a week or two.

      So, yeah, I was going to be on vacation, so it was the perfect time. No pets, and nobody at home, so I knew that it'd be safe, and I'd be reasonably sure which ones were in proper working order. Never DREAMED somebody would try to break in.

      --
      Vintage computer games and RPG books available. Email me if you're interested.
    5. Re:Fortunately for me by NeoSkandranon · · Score: 1

      Trapping's illegal too in a lot of places, acutally :)

      --
      If you can't see the value in jet powered ants you should turn in your nerd card. - Dunbal (464142)
  24. You can't rob a house by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Robbery means taking something from your person or your immediate control by force or threat of force. They most likely mean burglary.

  25. What's more fun than shooting fish in a barrel? by tomhudson · · Score: 2, Interesting
    1. Twitter that you're gon for the weekend - too bad, because you won't get to enjoy your new big-screen home theatre with media pc.
    2. Wait with loaded shotguns for robbers to break in.
    3. BOOM!BOOM!

    Profit? NRA endorsements, talk-show circuit, book deals ...

    1. Re:What's more fun than shooting fish in a barrel? by MrNaz · · Score: 1

      Jail for unreasonable use of deadly force?

      --
      I hate printers.
    2. Re:What's more fun than shooting fish in a barrel? by tomhudson · · Score: 5, Informative
      You can also follow the site owner on twitter: http://twitter.com/Mikepruett
      >Mikepruett
      >Mike Pruett | Rochester, MN
      >@WheresKiger Just eat at a new fast food place called Nupa Express on 11thAve NW and Civic Center Drive it was GREAT 11:12 PM Sep 15th, 2009

      ... and rob HIS house when he's not home:

      >Domain name: PLEASESUEME.COM
      >Pruett, Mike mlt@mltgroup.com
      >4012 5th Place NW, Rochester, MN 55901

      Give him a call to tell him you appreciate being able to track him: 507-281-3490

    3. Re:What's more fun than shooting fish in a barrel? by Boomerang+Fish · · Score: 4, Funny

      Oh my god! It's coming right for us!

    4. Re:What's more fun than shooting fish in a barrel? by tomhudson · · Score: 1

      Jail for unreasonable use of deadly force?

      Are you trying to claim that blasting someone in the face with a shotgun is somehow illegal in the USofA?

      Dick Cheney would like a word with you :-)

      Personally, I wouldn't shoot them ... I'd let them shake hands with Mr. 240 volts when they try to open the garage door. Or some paint stripper. Turn it into a gel with vaseline, mix in some phosphorus, and CAREFULLY, using one of those turkey injectors, refill some paint-balls (if you don't know how to handle phosphorus, don't do this!). That'll leave a perma-mark.

    5. Re:What's more fun than shooting fish in a barrel? by Tuidjy · · Score: 2, Informative

      You'd have a better chance in court if you shot them while they were on your property
      than if you electrocuted them with a contraption that was clearly non-accidental.

      --
      No good deed goes unpunished...
    6. Re:What's more fun than shooting fish in a barrel? by ae1294 · · Score: 1

      Jail for unreasonable use of deadly force?

      Well shot-guns are legal everywhere in the US as far as I can figure. (we do have some handgun bans in places) Blowing someone's head off who is inside your home is legal pretty much everywhere in the US as long as you make sure to claim you where afraid for your life and you make sure not to shoot them in the back.

      So in the US anyhow his statement works. But it would work better if he was over the age of 40 since the laws here seem to change based on how old you are. If you're a 20 something someone might think you've been playing to many computer games or something.

    7. Re:What's more fun than shooting fish in a barrel? by Larryish · · Score: 1

      A friend has some property out in the county. He used to have big problems with people on 4-wheelers coming through the back gate and tearing up the place.

      So he took some rebar and a grinder and made steel spikes, which he put at different places on the road, and hung a big sign "SPIKES IN ROAD".

      Some dipshit came roaring through on his 4 wheeler and got his tires popped. He came up to the house and asked if he could use the phone, and complaining about his tires.

      When asked why he was riding on the road when the sign clearly advertised the presence of spikes, he said that he "didn't think there were really spikes in the road".

      People are idiots.

    8. Re:What's more fun than shooting fish in a barrel? by twidarkling · · Score: 2, Interesting

      So in the US anyhow his statement works.

      That's actually not true. The premise is referred to as "The Castle Doctrine," and it's a lot more stringent than people think. It requires more than just "in fear for my life" and not shooting someone in the back. And in that's just in places that actually have Castle Doctrine laws. States that don't, you're even more fucked if you try and shoot someone on your property.

      --
      Canada: The US's more awesome sibling.
    9. Re:What's more fun than shooting fish in a barrel? by flyneye · · Score: 1

      I guess that depends on just how wussy your state laws are and what tools the burglar had in his hand upon entry.
      A prybar is a common handy weapon/burglary tool and all it takes is to say " he drew it back as though to swing it so I perforated his head with my shotgun" handgun, whatever. If unarmed, once downed ,go to the garage and use some petrochemical and a rag to wipe one of your own down and squeeze his dead hand around on it a few times, wearing gloves yourself, then set it close to the body. Justice served!

      --
      *Repent!Quit Your Job!Slack Off!The World Ends Tomorrow and You May Die!
    10. Re:What's more fun than shooting fish in a barrel? by Dare+nMc · · Score: 3, Informative

      not sure where you got that premise of the castle doctrine, in most southern states with that law (like texas) you don't have to be in fear for your life, or the intruder even be armed, if at your own residence.
      http://www.associatedcontent.com/article/852831/deadly_force_and_self_defense_to_protect.html?cat=17
      Pretty much every state says you don't have to retreat from your property instead of deadly confrontation, (ie any "I was scared for my life" defense, if reasonable, would work at home.) Some states even allow you to protect yourself with deadly force to hold your ground in any setting where you are legally allowed to be.

    11. Re:What's more fun than shooting fish in a barrel? by billybacs · · Score: 1

      Up until (I think) 2005, in Florida you couldn't use deadly force until you made a sincere effort to escape...So you had to try running away before you could shoot.

    12. Re:What's more fun than shooting fish in a barrel? by davester666 · · Score: 1

      Yup. And the guy who put the spikes in the road was crazy lucky. Even clearly marked booby traps are against the law pretty much across the US, and if the guy riding the 4-wheeler fell on a spike and was injured or killed, the owner could expect some fun jail time as well as a most excellent lawsuit.

      --
      Sleep your way to a whiter smile...date a dentist!
    13. Re:What's more fun than shooting fish in a barrel? by Mister+Whirly · · Score: 1

      Blowing someone's head off who is inside your home is legal pretty much everywhere in Texas

      There, fixed it for you.

      --
      "But this one goes to 11!"
    14. Re:What's more fun than shooting fish in a barrel? by eleuthero · · Score: 3, Informative

      the only problem with this is that depending on how he placed the spikes, caltrops are completely legal (parking lot entrances with one way spikes, etc.). I agree that he could have run into problems if he didn't follow local laws, but spikes in the road are not by their very nature illegal.

    15. Re:What's more fun than shooting fish in a barrel? by P-Nuts · · Score: 2, Informative

      Yup. And the guy who put the spikes in the road was crazy lucky. Even clearly marked booby traps are against the law pretty much across the US, and if the guy riding the 4-wheeler fell on a spike and was injured or killed, the owner could expect some fun jail time as well as a most excellent lawsuit.

      What's the legality of the "severe tire damage" spikes you have in car parks to stop people going the wrong way?

    16. Re:What's more fun than shooting fish in a barrel? by eleuthero · · Score: 2, Informative

      He was referring to states that either had stringent rules or did not have "castle doctrine" laws. There was an article in the news a few years back about a guy in Michigan who was being tried for murder after shooting someone who entered his house with the intent to rob him (assault as well?). It is intriguing (and I do not know the outcome) but Wikipedia reports that Michigan only recently created a castle doctrine (2006).

    17. Re:What's more fun than shooting fish in a barrel? by jimbolauski · · Score: 1

      Depends on where you call home.

      --
      Knowledge = Power
      P= W/t
      t=Money
      Money = Work/Knowledge so the less you know the more you make
    18. Re:What's more fun than shooting fish in a barrel? by TheLink · · Score: 1

      I heard there are also states with the "needed killing" doctrine :).

      --
    19. Re:What's more fun than shooting fish in a barrel? by moortak · · Score: 1

      It tends to just be a murder charge if you knowingly tried to get them to enter. Once you try to get someone to enter, even illegally, you could very well be looking at a first degree murder charge.

      --
      Xavier Rabourdin for president 2012
    20. Re:What's more fun than shooting fish in a barrel? by stephanruby · · Score: 2, Informative

      You should tell my local supermarket that. They have spikes so that traffic can only exit through it, otherwise it just pops their tires. So far, no one has gone to jail for it (somehow, I think you're thinking of much different kinds of spikes).

    21. Re:What's more fun than shooting fish in a barrel? by hairyfeet · · Score: 1

      i don't know about that, most states in the south we just have unwritten laws, like "he needed killin" which is well known enough that local comedians here make jokes about it. Many here wondered after that bitch drove that kid to suicide with the fake boyfriend why her mom just didn't use the "she needed killin" to fix that problem, but maybe they don't have that in St. Louis.

      That said we here in AR rarely get to use our guns to shoot anybody, as we nearly all have MoMs (mean old mutts) on our property. They are dirt cheap, hell most pounds will be happy to give you one for the prices of shots, or you can just tame a stray, they are cheap to own, happy to live off of table scraps and have a dry place to sleep, and are loyal as hell. last time there was a crackhead stealing gas from the apartments down the road I thought "yeah, wait until he gets here" and sure enough one morning I come out to find old Jack happily munching on a fresh plate of eggs (his favorite). I said "what did Jack do to deserve eggs?" and my oldest nephew held up a big chunk of bloody pants leg. They called the sheriff and told him what happened, and sure enough they found the scumbag in the ER getting his ass stitched back together and his car full of stolen stuff. Old Jack earned his eggs that morning!

      --
      ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
    22. Re:What's more fun than shooting fish in a barrel? by s122604 · · Score: 1

      Jail for unreasonable use of deadly force?

      Depends, In the state of Texas, I'm not even sure if the concept of "unreasonable deadly force" exists for an uninvited stranger inside your house, be they armed/unarmed/coming/going whatever... Hell, Joe Horn was vindicated for killing two house robbers outside of somebody else's house....

    23. Re:What's more fun than shooting fish in a barrel? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Unreasonable? Don't break into people's homes. Pretty simple. A number of states allow you to shoot intruders. Guess what their break in rates are? Too bad so many pussies like you feel crime should be encouraged and rewarded.

    24. Re:What's more fun than shooting fish in a barrel? by russotto · · Score: 1

      If unarmed, once downed ,go to the garage and use some petrochemical and a rag to wipe one of your own down and squeeze his dead hand around on it a few times, wearing gloves yourself, then set it close to the body.

      Only do this if you know the forensics people who will be investigating it are idiots. (So if you live in Oakland or LAPD jurisdiction, you're fine). Otherwise, you've not only screwed up a possible self defense verdict, but you'll also be charged with tampering with the evidence. For one thing, when someone is shot, the blood tends to spray everywhere. Including on any weapons they might be holding. Your planted prybar is going to be lacking in blood spray, which will immediately tell them the dead guy wasn't holding it when he was shot.

    25. Re:What's more fun than shooting fish in a barrel? by Golddess · · Score: 1

      Until it is discovered that the gun in the robber's hand is registered to you, the robber's entry path did not take him near the gun, and if you claim he must have stolen it before that night, why didn't you report it missing?

      --
      "I'm not sure I like the fugnutish tone you used in your post!" -RogL (608926)-
    26. Re:What's more fun than shooting fish in a barrel? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >@WheresKiger Just eat at a new fast food place called Nupa Express on 11thAve NW and Civic Center Drive it was GREAT 11:12 PM Sep 15th, 2009

      ... and rob HIS house when he's not home

      Sweet! I'll just dust off the old time machine and do it right now!

    27. Re:What's more fun than shooting fish in a barrel? by tomhudson · · Score: 1
      Well, up here (Kanuckistan) we have gun-control laws, etc., and yet you won't be charged if you shoot a robber in the back who is retreating. The reasoning is simple - just because the guy is leaving doesn't mean that he won't come back for revenge since you scared him off, so you're justified in shooting him in the back - he is the one who created the original situation by attempted forcible robbery.

      The actual case was a store owner who had been robbed multiple times, got an illegal handgun, and shot the next robber in the back while the robber was fleeing the store after seeing the store owner now had a gun.

      Prosecutors refused to charge the guy with murder, manslaughter, or even criminal negligence because they knew of a jury convicting was between zero and none.

      Moral of the story - don't stat sh*t you can't finish.

    28. Re:What's more fun than shooting fish in a barrel? by ae1294 · · Score: 1

      I'd hope that any half-ass lawyer could get the guy off. Most of the time they use the "It could be you on trial for trying to protect your wife from being raped by the robber" defense or the "He was a piece of shit and needed killin" defense...

      Most of the time the DA won't even bother trying to prosecute such a case since regardless of what the law says no jury likes the idea of a crack heads in their own homes takin their shit or fucking with them.

    29. Re:What's more fun than shooting fish in a barrel? by ae1294 · · Score: 1

      The Castle Doctrine," and it's a lot more stringent than people think

      Not here in the south, maybe some northern states have laws that say you can't protect yourself in your own home but regardless the court of public opinion is pretty powerful so you would just have to make sure not to look too much like you where waiting with the gun pointed at the door. It helps to do what the cops do and have a gun or knife to plant on the corpse as well..

      But regardless non-premeditated murder only gets ya 3 to 5 years, it's not like you're a hacker or pedophile...

    30. Re:What's more fun than shooting fish in a barrel? by ae1294 · · Score: 1

      For one thing, when someone is shot, the blood tends to spray everywhere.

      This is a good pro-tip. Best to use something small and make sure it ends up in a pool of blood, then you make sure you move it a safe distance from the headless intruder since hell you never know, he might have got back up!

    31. Re:What's more fun than shooting fish in a barrel? by drkim · · Score: 1

      ...even more hilarious was that he totally failed to notice the:
      "DANGER! Spikes pop out of phone receiver!"
      sign right over the phone!

      We laughed for hours...

    32. Re:What's more fun than shooting fish in a barrel? by flyneye · · Score: 1

      I have the gun ,he has a burglary tool.

      --
      *Repent!Quit Your Job!Slack Off!The World Ends Tomorrow and You May Die!
    33. Re:What's more fun than shooting fish in a barrel? by flyneye · · Score: 1

      Good Point. Stage it in the blood pool or shoot him again holding it. Nothing wrong with emptying the clip into him.

      --
      *Repent!Quit Your Job!Slack Off!The World Ends Tomorrow and You May Die!
    34. Re:What's more fun than shooting fish in a barrel? by Golddess · · Score: 1

      If unarmed, once downed ,go to the garage and use some petrochemical and a rag to wipe one of your own down and squeeze his dead hand around on it a few times, wearing gloves yourself, then set it close to the body.

      That's the part I was commenting on.

      --
      "I'm not sure I like the fugnutish tone you used in your post!" -RogL (608926)-
    35. Re:What's more fun than shooting fish in a barrel? by flyneye · · Score: 1

      Oh,I was referring to putting a prybar, not a gun into his hand. Cheaper commodity, no registration needed.

      --
      *Repent!Quit Your Job!Slack Off!The World Ends Tomorrow and You May Die!
  26. Set a trap by whoda · · Score: 1, Redundant

    I'm going to Greece for a week!
    I live at 123 Main street anytown, USA
    Bye everyone, I'm leaving now!
    (Don't really leave, sit just inside door with shotgun)
    ?
    Profit!

    1. Re:Set a trap by eleuthero · · Score: 1

      somehow I don't see you making much in profit - you are going to have to hire a lawyer even if it is declared justified homicide

  27. No need for this tool by warrior_s · · Score: 1

    A little bit of common sense can go long way.. most of the people are not in their house during day-time.. umm when they leave their house for work..
    i don't think posting that you are out of your home for few hours is going to make much difference... the robbers have to make sure that your neighbors are also not at their home
    may be we can go one step ahead and make a website that does that too..

    in addition to XXX, three of their neighbors have also left their house

    1. Re:No need for this tool by Cro+Magnon · · Score: 1

      The problem is when they go on vacation. The criminal already knows they're not home, but if they're tweeting from 3,000 miles away, they can be sure they won't come back to catch them in the act.

      --
      Slow down, cowboy! It has been 4 hours since you last posted. You must wait another few hours.
  28. If you want to rob me ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    Please try my ex-wife's house. That's where you'll find my stuff.

  29. You flatter yoursleves by Trivial+Solutions · · Score: 1

    There's money to be made scaring grandma, isn't there? I die laughing at people who worry about their secrets.

    --
    When God goes to war, He drops big bangs.
  30. 23:00 by SmallFurryCreature · · Score: 0

    23:00 - crap, forgot to feed the rotwheiler. Ah well, I am sure he can find something around the house.

    --

    MMO Quests are like orgasms:

    You may solo them, I prefer them in a group.

  31. Mmm, well according to my Simpsons by SmallFurryCreature · · Score: 1

    Mmm, well according to my Simpsons guide to everything I need to know about the US of A, it don't work if you invite them in. Could be called entrapment. Honey traps by the cops are legal because they don't entice people to break into those honey pots, they don't leave extra valuable stuff in the car or leave the door open or something like that, just another parked car, no enticement == funny arrest videos.

    --

    MMO Quests are like orgasms:

    You may solo them, I prefer them in a group.

    1. Re:Mmm, well according to my Simpsons by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They did on Cops. The officer explained that they put jewelery (I think that's what it was) in the center console so if would bump up the crime to the next level. He then explained that "this is America, you should be able to leave your car unlocked" and as I recall they left a window open as well.

  32. How many bears do you know that use twitter? by SmallFurryCreature · · Score: 3, Funny

    10am, hibernating.

    11am, hibernating.

    12am, hibernating.

    1pm, hibernating.

    2pm, hibernating.

    3pm, hibernating.

    4pm, hibernating.

    5pm, hibernating.

    6pm, hibernating.

    7pm, ate hitchhiker.

    8pm, hibernating.

    9pm, hibernating.

    Mind you, considering the average tweeter, this is actually pretty riveting stuff.

    --

    MMO Quests are like orgasms:

    You may solo them, I prefer them in a group.

  33. According to twitter, the site owner isn't home by tomhudson · · Score: 1
    Last tweet, he's out eating breakfast. ttp:twittercomMikepruett

    Domain name: PLEASESUEME.COM
    Administrative Contact:
    Pruett, Mike mlt@mltgroup.com
    4012 5th Place NW
    Rochester, MN 55901
    US
    507-281-3490

  34. pedanting by fulldecent · · Score: 1

    So really, this should be called "Please Rob Him".

    --

    -- I was raised on the command line, bitch

    1. Re:pedanting by Dachannien · · Score: 1

      Actually, it should be, "Please Burgle Him". It's not robbery unless you actually take something directly from the person, and the premise of the site tends to preclude that, since the victim isn't supposed to be home.

  35. economic value of twitter by hellothatsme · · Score: 1

    Cool, I dont understand how people can still state there is no money in these twitter web 2.0 services. The site needs some improvements though: there should be a twitter robbery feed to better spread the news which robber chose which house, its quite sad to look through the broken window of MrsMelanies house with 10 other potential robbers and see, that the flatscreen tv is already gone. Keep up the good work, its time for the premium services!

    1. Re:economic value of twitter by Pop69 · · Score: 1

      Even better to tie it all together to google street view, then you can scope the place out without actually having to go there

  36. Some problems and a solution by bbtom · · Score: 4, Interesting

    1. It needs to be "please burgle me". If you aren't at home, then you are being burgled, not robbed. A robbery is theft with violence or the threat of violence (at least in English law - Theft Act 1958 - it is). If nobody is at home, then nobody can be the victim of violence or the threat of violence. So your home is getting burgled - or, if you are an American, burglarized (what the hell kind of a word is that, right?).

    2. PleaseRobMe seems to be built around the premise that one home = one person. If you know where I live, please be assured that I am currently not at my home. But other people live where I live. Families exist. Flat sharing exists. Communal living exists. (Yeah, go and raid the kibbutz - I'm sure it'll be empty!) This may be true for Web 2.0 valleyboys. It's not true of the rest of the planet.

    That said, this kind of thing does show why most location-based services are stupidly designed. I have played around with a few of them, and the only one I'm a real big fan of is FireEagle. Sadly, it's been a bit neglected for business reasons - i.e. Yahoo! financial situation. What is great about FireEagle is you share you location with FireEagle, and they then share it with whatever services you want to share it with. So, I have the little iPhone app which updates FireEagle. FireEagle knows exactly where I am. Then there's a Facebook app which connects to FireEagle, but I don't necessarily have to let it broadcast my location if I don't want it to. Or I can only give a vague location - perhaps at a country or city level. I have it wired in to my SSH setup, so if I SSH in to my Linux box from certain places, it updates my location. Because it is a location broker, it can be updated in any way people think of, rather than having to use a specific application (say, for the iPhone) like FourSquare etc. do.

    This is useful as I can build applications that sit on top of it. One I have been meaning to build is a "remind me when I'm at X" app. So I could basically dump a string (SMS/tweet length) into a database with a broad location in it. It could check against my location and when they match, I could be reminded of X. Remember to buy ice cream when I'm at the supermarket - well, when I'm at the supermarket, I should get a text message saying to buy ice cream.

    Location-based services shouldn't be tied to devices but to people. This is what everyone gets wrong. They need really good granular privacy controls. They need a big "forget me" option. This is something Google Latitude doesn't have. There is no way I have found to tell Google Latitude "Hey, take me off the radar. I'm not anywhere anymore."

    When I have some time to build it, I'd love to build something like FireEagle but running on my servers and just for me. Location is too important, useful and fun to trust Google or Yahoo! or some venture-backed Valley startup with. But if you are building location-based services, look at FireEagle and learn.

    --
    catch (HumourFailureException e) { e.user.send("You, sir, are a humourless idiot."); }
    1. Re:Some problems and a solution by bbtom · · Score: 1

      Theft Act 1968, not '58. Damn computer should output what I think not what I type.

      --
      catch (HumourFailureException e) { e.user.send("You, sir, are a humourless idiot."); }
    2. Re:Some problems and a solution by stangbat · · Score: 1

      Came here to say this. If you go to the person's home and take stuff while they are away, you are a burglar.

      So while we are being pedantic, I'd like to discuss the Hamburglar too.

    3. Re:Some problems and a solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Regarding location based reminders :

      The OmniFocus iPhone app already does this

      http://www.omnigroup.com/applications/omnifocus

    4. Re:Some problems and a solution by bbtom · · Score: 1

      Yes, OmniFocus does it - and Remember The Milk does it too, if I recall correctly.

      I plan to build all my own location services stuff (possibly open source it if it doesn't suck too much) so it works with both my iPod touch and with my nasty old phone (and any other way I can think of moving data around).

      --
      catch (HumourFailureException e) { e.user.send("You, sir, are a humourless idiot."); }
    5. Re:Some problems and a solution by julesh · · Score: 1

      1. It needs to be "please burgle me". If you aren't at home, then you are being burgled, not robbed. A robbery is theft with violence or the threat of violence

      rob v. tr.
      [...]
      3. to plunder or rifle (a house, shop, etc.).
      Dictionary.com Unabridged
      Based on the Random House Dictionary, © Random House, Inc. 2010.

      Yes, violence or threat are part of the _main_ definition, but the word is used informally to refer to most kinds of theft, and it is an accepted, established usage of the word.

      2. PleaseRobMe seems to be built around the premise that one home = one person. If you know where I live, please be assured that I am currently not at my home. But other people live where I live. Families exist. Flat sharing exists. Communal living exists. (Yeah, go and raid the kibbutz - I'm sure it'll be empty!) This may be true for Web 2.0 valleyboys. It's not true of the rest of the planet.

      Yeah, but there's likely to be enough information on a twitter account to work out all this stuff, and identify the people who live alone (who aren't that rare, after all).

    6. Re:Some problems and a solution by corerunner · · Score: 1

      The Locale application for Android allows you to create both reminders and custom phone settings profiles based on current location, which can be read through GPS, wifi, and other means.

      --
      "Don't hate the media, become the media." -Jello Biafra
    7. Re:Some problems and a solution by bbtom · · Score: 1

      I haven't seen Locale on Android, but I've seen MarcoPolo for the Mac. It's not driven by location but does settings driven on "context", which you can determine on the basis of a whole bunch of properties including networking, applications, accessible hosts, power status and time of day. You can specify how much each rule should count, so it can 'fuzzy match' contexts. When the context changes, the app can change a whole bunch of different things for you (and, for instance, connect to network shares, set status messages in iChat and so on).

      Anyone know of anything like this on Linux?

      --
      catch (HumourFailureException e) { e.user.send("You, sir, are a humourless idiot."); }
    8. Re:Some problems and a solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In fact, the site indexes people's locations. So I would guess that they could be robbed, an extension of knowing where they are, is that they may not be at home and burglary can be committed also. But since, people are not going to be burgled with no information of their home address indexed, I'd believe it's more likely they can be robbed and/or mugged as main goal of everyone knowing their current location.

  37. Idea time... by Arimus · · Score: 1

    1. I have a couple of large dogs.
    2. The dogs need feeding.
    3. Food is expensive.
    4. Tweet I'm going away for a few days and have left xyz on the desk oh dear.
    5. Dogs fed.
    6. Profit!

    --
    --- Users are like bacteria -> Each one causing a thousand tiny crises until the host finally gives up and dies.
  38. Geez SFC by BitterAndDrunk · · Score: 2, Informative

    Not only did you completely miss the joke, but at least to moderators did as well. It's a honeypot, you don't want a deterrent like a dog post.

    --
    You better watch out, there may be dogs about . . .
    1. Re:Geez SFC by gparent · · Score: 1

      23:00 - crap, told the neighbor to shoot my dog if I wasn't there to feed it and it kept barking.

  39. Status by lymond01 · · Score: 1

    8:35 AM: On vacation until March. However, I'm contributing to the American economy by having hired 24-7 shark handlers and focused light and radiation engineers. The night shift guy is precisely 1/8th my size.

    8:37: Muahahaha. Muahahahah. Muahahahahahahahahaha.

  40. Fuck me running by BitterAndDrunk · · Score: 2
    TWO moderators!

    TWO

    Augh

    --
    You better watch out, there may be dogs about . . .
  41. Google maps+streetview mashup=SWEET by FreeUser · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Anyone mash this up with googlemaps and streetview yet? That would really drive the point home.

    At last a little payback for all this unfettered twitter narcisism. It's probably not very nice, but I can't help feeling more than my share of shadenfreude...

    --
    The Future of Human Evolution: Autonomy
    1. Re:Google maps+streetview mashup=SWEET by dmartine40 · · Score: 1

      You know, twitter narcisism is annoying but you know what? I just don't pay attention to it. I really have a hard time figuring out why people would feel justified in "paybacks" like this. I see the "point" this site is trying to make. I don't like the means it's using to make its point.

    2. Re:Google maps+streetview mashup=SWEET by ajs · · Score: 1

      ... this unfettered twitter narcisism ...

      No, I just can't buy into this any longer.

      There's nothing narcissistic in posting something to Twitter/Buzz/Facebook. The problem is that it's not clear who the audience is. I just posted something to buzz about a local restaurant I was getting takeout from. Someone might look at that and say, "why do we care?" On the other hand, the post achieved its purpose: it incited conversation among my friends about where to eat in the area.

    3. Re:Google maps+streetview mashup=SWEET by Dalambertian · · Score: 1

      Me too. What I really hate are all those morons going to coffee shops and "having a good time" with their dates. They are so smug, strutting about showing their real faces in public. Soon we'll have enough cameras and facial recognition to show these bastards who's boss. Match their faces with their home addresses and google maps and rob them blind. That'll teach em.

  42. Shouldn't be illegal . . . by YenTheFirst · · Score: 1
    I'd be really dissapointed if these guys got sued.

    The only thing they're doing is scanning twitter for foursquare addresses, and prepending an "I'm out of the house".

    They aren't publishing information that wasn't already public, or even aggregating it in new and creative ways. They're just recontextualizing posts people are already putting online!

    --
    It's not stupid. It's Advanced.
  43. Robbery? or burglury! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Robbery, by definition, means the victim is present, as in, the robber steals from the victim. If you are away, your house may get burgled, but not robbed.

    1. Re:Robbery? or burglury! by dotgain · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Worry not! Free dictionaries around the world are blurring the definition as we speak. Another pair of words that used to mean different things, but now mean the same thing, thanks to good old fashioned honest-to-god ignorance. See also "literally" vs. "figuratively"

    2. Re:Robbery? or burglury! by pclminion · · Score: 1

      Dude, the distinction is important. There's a world of difference between having a gun shoved in your face with demands for your cash and jewels, and finding some of your possessions missing when you return home after a night out. Anybody who's actually been robbed understands the difference very clearly.

    3. Re:Robbery? or burglury! by dotgain · · Score: 1

      When somebody says something like "Thanks to ... ignorance", it should occur to you there's just a smidgen of a possibility they're being facetious. While I too have had a knife held to my throat, that's not what matters, the distinction is important to me because I consider myself a linguist, and don't need to be robbed to appreciate why the distinction is important.

  44. Reducing Costs by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

    The issue isn't people sharing their information, its people like these guys who are just being ass holes.

    That's exactly right. The only value of any security measure is to increase the costs for the bad guys (whomever that is from your perspective) to do you harm.

    This service decreases the costs of finding people to harm. Without this service, the costs are much higher, so this service potentially does real harm. Heck, an unlocked house without this service is probably more secure than a locked house with this service - that speaks to the level of harm.

    Maybe when somebody posts the home addresses of those involved they'll get it.

    --
    My God, it's Full of Source!
    OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
  45. So what? by davmoo · · Score: 1

    Maybe I'm not home, and maybe I have announced that on twitter. But my pit bull is always home and he doesn't use twitter.

    --
    I want a new quote. One that won't spill. One that don't cost too much. Or come in a pill.
    1. Re:So what? by RJFerret · · Score: 1

      You can solve that with this tweeting dog collar.

      -Randy

      PS: I can see it now...

      My pit bull: When's dinner? (2 minutes ago)

      My pit bull: That was yummy (6 minutes ago)

      My pit bull: munch, munch (6 minutes ago)

      My pit bull: woof, Woof, WOOF, GROWL (7 minutes ago)

      My pit bull: woof (7 minutes ago)

      My pit bull: When's dinner? (about an hour ago)

  46. openvpn can put somewhat of a damper on that by Locutus · · Score: 1

    If your location based service isn't using your GPS but is using your IP address then openvpn helps here. And maybe there's a market for a personal WAP which is connected to your home network via openvpn. As devices get smarter, so should we.

    I wonder if any of these new smartphones can double as a WAP while using either 3G or Wifi for Internet connectivity?

    LoB

    --
    "Anyone who stands out in the middle of a road looks like roadkill to me." --Linus
    1. Re:openvpn can put somewhat of a damper on that by julesh · · Score: 1

      If your location based service isn't using your GPS but is using your IP address [...] ... then it's a pathetic location based service. I mean, seriously, the closest anyone seems to be able to locate me based on my IP address is Wolverhampton, which is nearly 45 miles away from me. That's when they don't put me in Oxford, 60 miles away, or London, 110 miles away.

  47. And the moral of the story is... by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 1

    This is why some 12-year-olds really shouldn't be allowed to use the computer unsupervised.

    --
    #DeleteChrome
  48. Enjoy the home alarm and security by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm not home, however I have a nice alarm with lots of fun motion sensors. When armed, standing in my yard for a few minutes sends a warning out to security. Basically, you break in, you'll hear a car siren in about a minute, assuming you can hear it over the sonic shockwave of my custom built alarm siren. (I think I may come close to violating some noise ordinance with that thing, you can hear it for blocks.)

  49. Bag 'em by Trip6 · · Score: 1

    Set your status to away, park your car down the block, get out the "home defense" technology guaranteed under the second amendment. Vigilante justice, baby!!!

    Umm, just to confirm, I'm kidding...

    --
    I hate being bipolar; it's awesome!
  50. Flip side by Low+Ranked+Craig · · Score: 1

    Posting "currently out of the country for two months" and sitting in the living room with a shotgun could be fun.

    --
    I still cannot find the droids I am looking for...
  51. Coming this fall to TruTV by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...BAITTWEET!

  52. Morons by Trivial+Solutions · · Score: 1

    39 But I say to you, offer no resistance to one who is evil. When someone strikes you on (your) right cheek, turn the other one to him as well. 40 If anyone wants to go to law with you over your tunic, hand him your cloak as well. 41 Should anyone press you into service for one mile, 26 go with him for two miles. 42 Give to the one who asks of you, and do not turn your back on one who wants to borrow. 43

    --
    When God goes to war, He drops big bangs.
    1. Re:Morons by flyneye · · Score: 1

      Well, that is good and admirable instruction for those professing the Christian faith. The world isn't full of Christians however, there are even those who have brought about counter philosophies you may even run into:
            "You have heard in the book of love that if a man shall smite you on your right cheek, turn also your left. What a ridiculous philosophy aimed at a population with no survival skills. I say 'If a man should strike you on your right cheek, smash him on his left. Beat him hip and thigh , that he may ruminate over what he has done' ". -Anton Szandor LaVey

            One needn't even be a follower of the Satan Church to philosophize outside Christian standards. To not protect your home and family against danger is also "casting pearls to swine".

      --
      *Repent!Quit Your Job!Slack Off!The World Ends Tomorrow and You May Die!
  53. basic scheme by MrShaggy · · Score: 1

    This happened a few years ago.

    A family discovers that the BBQ has been stolen.

    There is a note in the mail the next day. The note says that they are sorry over the BBQ, since their kid stole it. There is some Tickets for an event a few days later.

    The owners of the house come back to discover that they had been robbed.

    Everything was gone.

    --
    I have mod points and I am not afraid to use them.
    1. Re:basic scheme by Opyros · · Score: 1

      Sounds like a version of this urban legend.

  54. Not all communities are soulless by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Criminals will still just sit out in front of your house and wait for the cars [to] leave.

    Only if you live in a neighborhood where that's possible. I never have. There's no on-street parking where I live now. I knew the cars of all my neighbors in the last house (and would certainly walk up to strangers sitting in their cars and ask them if I could help them with anything). In my first house the elderly lady next door maintained 24x7 vigilance over the entire street, and would either call police or come out with a shotgun if she saw anything amiss.

    Of course, if you live in an entirely soulless white-collar suburban community your remarks are 100% applicable. But I can't stomach those sorts of places, where nobody ever tears themselves away from the TV/Intertubes/Xbox for longer than it takes to hire a Mexican to mow the lawn. I know all my neighbors and chat with them frequently, I know what cars belong and when.

  55. Big brother and little brothers by Sloppy · · Score: 1

    This is sort of the point I try to make when people say that their innocuous emails (e.g. "Yes, we'll come to your party on Saturday night") don't need to be encrypted.

    At least the "nice" thing about having your bigscreen TV burgled, is that when you get home, you'll know that it happened. If your car insurance premium goes up $5 per month, you'll have no idea that it's because the insurance company figured out that you happen to travel through areas that have higher-than-average accident rates.

    Think about what you're leaking. And hell yes, fear the government, but they're not the only parties whose interests might conflict with your own.

    --
    As copyright owner of this comment, I authorize everyone to defeat any technological measure which limits access to it.
  56. Coding equivalent of a plastic surgery disaster by flyneye · · Score: 1

    "How long until the first actual robbery takes place?"

    How long until the liability suit against the coders takes place? Insurance lawyers are the hungriest of sharks. IANAL, but come on, there is some responsibility to be taken for facilitating crime with an application made specifically for encouraging crime in spite of what purpose you say it's for. Just ask the developers of Napster or Morpheus.

    "What brought you to pick this particular house to rob?"
    "Well, there was this computer application that alerted me to an empty house, I got it from www.pleaserobme.com"
    One whois and a warrant or two later...
    " Hello Mr.Clerk, We're filing a suit against these developers, set me up a court date with Judge R. Bean ASAP"

    There doesn't appear to be software to tell you when coders are clearly" out to lunch", but there is code that addresses the problem.

    --
    *Repent!Quit Your Job!Slack Off!The World Ends Tomorrow and You May Die!
  57. Not a very good PR job. by Hurricane78 · · Score: 1

    They left out the most important sentence, that everyone from the press MUST hear when he hears about this:

    The world does not need our site, for robbers to use this information to rob people. Robbers do that anyway.
    The world does need our site, so that we become aware that they do it anyway!

    --
    Any sufficiently advanced intelligence is indistinguishable from stupidity.
  58. ewww.. liability time by jollyreaper · · Score: 1

    Some prankster did something similar with dating sites. He put up a pic of some random hot chick as his profile and posed as a nympho looking for sex. He asked guys to send pictures of their faces and their junk and he got a ton of results, often with personal information that had them completely pegged as if faces weren't enough. Now at this point he could have just said "I could really drop the bomb on these people, the point has been proven" but no, he released everything instead. I don't know if there were any repercussions from this but that really didn't seem like a smart move.

    I think these guys are making a great point here but if they're really showing real info, nothing obfuscated, then a robbery is bound to happen. Even if the robber had no idea about this service and just happened to hit the house, the victim wouldn't know that and would naturally assume that's why he was hit. Liability out the ying-yang, methinks.

    --
    Kwisatz Haderach
    Sell the spice to CHOAM
    This Mahdi took Shaddam's Throne
  59. Counter-usage by halcyon1234 · · Score: 1

    @NRA tweets "Bob Smith at 142 Flower St., Green Park, MI is not at home. Visit for burglar-shaped target practice."

  60. Lol child-like Americans :-) by fantomas · · Score: 3, Insightful

    ...and that's why a lot of us are glad US law doesn't quite rule the whole world just yet.... sueing somebody else for emotional damage because you posted on the public internet that you're not at home, because this causes you "a great deal of emotional unrest". Presumably the same people will be sueing Google and every other search engine that's archiving these posts as they scrape the internet?

    Grow up, take responsibility for your own actions. If having the world knowing that you're not at home causes you "emotional unrest", well then don't tell the world. Seems to me that some folk are incredibly child-like, unable to take responsibility for their own actions. Not sure who to blame for this. But I sure hope these people don't have any influence or authority in the wider world, seems like they should be kept in some sort of kindergarten.

    1. Re:Lol child-like Americans :-) by Courageous · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Singling out a bunch of folks and posting about them at a place is not an action where the parties doing it need to think about TAKING RESPONSIBILITY FOR THEIR ACTIONS?

      You're pretty funny. This is a case of obvious harassment. I rather suspect the courts in YOUR country are likely to agree with me, your jingoism aside.

      C//

    2. Re:Lol child-like Americans :-) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The point of twitter is to tell stuff to everyone who wants to hear. All these people have done is temporarily boost the audience of some twits who are saying stuff that's not well thought through. Making a recording of me without my consent might be harassment, but if I put posters of myself all around town, and you photograph them for FAIL blog (because the cuddly toys on my bed in the background make me look like a wuss), I don't see how it could be called harassment to have boosted my audience after I went public first.

    3. Re:Lol child-like Americans :-) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Seems to me that some folk are incredibly child-like, unable to take responsibility for their own actions. Not sure who to blame for this. But I sure hope these people don't have any influence or authority in the wider world, seems like they should be kept in some sort of kindergarten.

      This statement pretty much defines Americans in the 21st century. Take the recent economic problems, for example. Many Americans are quick to blame banks for the housing meltdown, but deny that they were part of the problem too for buying overpriced houses they could not afford.

    4. Re:Lol child-like Americans :-) by Courageous · · Score: 1

      That's like saying if you posted your address on the internet once and I posted a message saying "PLEASE KILL THE OWNER OF THIS HOME" that it's not harassment. Don't be silly.

  61. Dear Rob(ber), Sorry I didn't tweet about Rex. by guysmilee · · Score: 1

    Dear Rob(ber),

    Sorry I didn't tweet about Rex. He's embarrassingly frisky so I tend not to bring it up.

  62. You may get in.... by CristalShandaLear · · Score: 1

    My daughter and I are going out of town this weekend. We've both Facebooked it and she's Twittered it.

    Now if, someone surmises from that, it's a good weekend to rob my house, they're stupid. Upon breaking in they'd find my 6'4" 275 boyfriend and a loaded shotgun and two enormous dogs that don't cotton to strangers.

    And even if they get through them, they'd have to get past our Militia Member neighbor, who, when we first moved in 11 years ago, told us plainly upon meeting, "I don't have no use for blacks." He's since taken a better liking to us since his wife died a few years back and my daughter insists on baking him cookies every week and seeing after him when his own kids stopped coming by.

    He never sleeps, is watchful of every house in our neighborhood and will shoot anything in his yard (or ours if we simply call and ask) after dark.

    So, good luck. God speed. Cuz they'll definitely be picking you up in pieces should you choose to rob our house. You may get in, but you won't get out.

  63. I hate these sites by hesaigo999ca · · Score: 1

    One of the reason why i hate these sites, people who do not know any better, trust them, and think life is honky dory, but problem is giving too much info can get you in trouble. So now they can get robbed, because someone knows they are in miami vacationing.
    I gotta say, brings a whole new era of data mining.

  64. Yeah, fuck Rosa Parks. What a stupid lazy asshat! by professorguy · · Score: 0

    1850: Slaves that run away are criminals. They shouldn't have rights.
    1910: Women who try to vote are criminals. They shouldn't have rights.
    1940: Jews trying to leave the ghetto are criminals. They shouldn't have rights.

    Yeah, that's a helluva world you're trying to build there.

    Maybe there's a reason we judge a society by how it treats the least of its members.

  65. I always announce it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I always announce on the Internet when people I don't like leave their homes for vacation. "Joe Asshole at 125 Main St will be gone from Feb-12 to Feb-29!"

    Does this new website have a way to add arbitrary information like this, or do I need to set up a fake twitter account?

  66. Great by kimvette · · Score: 1

    ' How long until the first actual robbery takes place?"

    Great. Thanks for giving douchebags ideas.

    --
    The Christian Right is Neither (Christian nor right). See: Matthew 23, Matthew 25, Ezekiel 16:48-50
  67. Ummm.... by flahwho · · Score: 0

    I came home after tweeting I was out of town to find my house broken into and HOLY CRAP WHERES MY TV!?

  68. Reminds me of "The Stalker's Home Page" by Ungrounded+Lightning · · Score: 1

    This reminds me of The Stalker's Home Page - which Glen Roberts put up as a warning about the many places that personal information is published on the web. It lists a large number of personal-information resources available publicly on the web.

    Glen's a privacy advocate. (Early on he filed a freedom of information request on the CIA asking for their manual of procedures for responding to freedom of information act requests. B-) ) The page title is a shocker to attract attention to the risks of these databases - which he wants to go away.

    --
    Bantam Dominique roosters crow a four-note song. Once you've heard it as "Happy BIRTHday" you can't NOT hear it that way
  69. Rob? by Hoi+Polloi · · Score: 2, Funny

    I don't know who this Rob guy is or what he has in mind but I don't like the sound of it.

    --
    It is by the juice of the coffee bean that thoughts acquire speed, the teeth acquire stains. The stains become a warning
  70. Re:Yeah, fuck Rosa Parks. What a stupid lazy assha by Archangel+Michael · · Score: 1

    And by "criminals" we're talking about everything that was considered a crime throughout all of history. Nice Strawman.

    --
    Agent K: A *person* is smart. People are dumb, stupid, panicky animals, and you know it.
  71. I wish someone would tell the LAPD this by commodoresloat · · Score: 1

    I lived with a douchebag housemate for a while and he was fucking paranoid that the neighbor was sneaking into our yard by hopping a fence, so he called the cops and he asked them if it would be ok to put razor blades on the top of the fence that would slash up any intruder's hands if they tried to hop it. I was glad he asked because I figured the cops would put him in his place. Instead they were all like, "Oh sure, I don't see a problem with that." I practically shit my pants when I heard that. Of course it was my own fault for living with this prick in the first place. I finally got him to take down the razor blades only after about 2 months of verbal humiliation....

  72. Finally! by DarthVain · · Score: 1

    A practical use for twitter!

  73. Turn it back the other way by LukeWebber · · Score: 1

    Instead of robbing them, go to where they are right now and give 'em a good, hard slap.
    Oh, OK. You can rob them first. But they won't learn anything either way.

  74. ...and he was convicted. by eleuthero · · Score: 1

    Self-Defense Act The law was apparently specifically enacted to get the guy out of jail and overrule the Michigan Supreme Court. More power to them.

    1. Re:...and he was convicted. by ae1294 · · Score: 1

      get the guy out of jail and overrule the Michigan Supreme Court. More power to them.

      Wow! that's pretty sad that he got convicted but it does say that he wasn't inside his home so I can at least understand it. I'm glad they got it sorted out in the end and now people aren't required by law to be a victim.

      Anyhow, I guess everyone should check their own state's law and make sure they know their rights before some jackass is inside their home at 3am...

  75. Finland, the land of the free by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I can leave my doors open when I leave my house, and still nobody comes in and loots my stuff. Having good social security system prevents awful lot of robberies. Also not letting corruption crawl into government + keeping mafia outside your country's borders helps a lot. ...still, we don't use Twitter because we kinda had this crazy SMS-frenzy back in 1990s.