Except that they aren't making their own tools. They are just rewriting their database abstraction layer so they can use a variety of didn't different backend databases rather than just couchdb.
To add, the only other way to get the controlling stake would be to work a deal with someone or some group of shareholders who own a controlling stake to sell there shares. This is also equally an unlikely situation.
You do resize that's not how the stock market works, right? You can't just choose to buy up the shares of the company unless there are enough sell orders to fullfill the buy order. And I seriously doubt that a sell order volume equivalent to 51% of the company is available for purchase.
That's the brilliant "editing" work of timothy. The original articles used "organized and systematic" attack but timothy must have thought that was too clear and not redundant enough for the slashdot title.
One doesn't need legal standing to publish one's opinion. Secondly that rule doesn't mean "said something I disagree with". This guy is wrong but is well within his rights to give out his opinion.
The only real restriction on it, is the new open source fork doesn't have copyright so they can't change the license -- ie its stuck on gpl version X. The new fork can't close source it or change the gpl version.
Wrong. If the code has the "or any other later version" clause it can be changed without needing permission.
Slashdot Mirror
And 30w less tdp.
Or get an i5-2500k which is faster than a lot of the x6s for only.like 20 bucks more.
AMD does have products which outperform equivalent Intel products,
Such as?
1995 called? So ext4 is from 1995? It has an online defrag utility, you know.
Bulldozer is a fail architecture. Lower performance and higher power draw than their own chips that are lower price like the phenom 2 six cores.
Yeah and? You do realize that sentences can have different contexts than the one before them, right?
Except that they aren't making their own tools. They are just rewriting their database abstraction layer so they can use a variety of didn't different backend databases rather than just couchdb.
Why? You're mostly just going to be contacting the same people who work for Couchbase since it's the company formed by a group of the main developers.
To add, the only other way to get the controlling stake would be to work a deal with someone or some group of shareholders who own a controlling stake to sell there shares. This is also equally an unlikely situation.
You do resize that's not how the stock market works, right? You can't just choose to buy up the shares of the company unless there are enough sell orders to fullfill the buy order. And I seriously doubt that a sell order volume equivalent to 51% of the company is available for purchase.
It's better than the two-day-old blogspam like the post about Linux kernel codenames that was nothing but a regurgitation of a wiki page.
That's the brilliant "editing" work of timothy. The original articles used "organized and systematic" attack but timothy must have thought that was too clear and not redundant enough for the slashdot title.
But those aren't listed requirements.
What tablet needs root access to use a web browser, check email, read pdfs, or use SSH?
One doesn't need legal standing to publish one's opinion. Secondly that rule doesn't mean "said something I disagree with". This guy is wrong but is well within his rights to give out his opinion.
What is the problem? The copyright owners are fine with what Google is doing. The only people up in arms are those with no legal standing.
You hold copyrights on the headers? If not it really doesn't matter what you think.
The only real restriction on it, is the new open source fork doesn't have copyright so they can't change the license -- ie its stuck on gpl version X. The new fork can't close source it or change the gpl version.
Wrong. If the code has the "or any other later version" clause it can be changed without needing permission.
Don't get too excited it was just accidentally turned in the direction of goatse.
If they are still investigating the matter? Sure. What is really gained by releasing a statement before you know what the issue is?
People who use tablets for more than fart apps and Angry Birds? Why wouldn't want to run it on my tablet?
In the case of 99% of desktop users, the only user who ever actually uses the system?
Except that Android is radically different than Red Hat? Sure they share a kernel base to some degree, but that's about it.
The Streak is not a phone.
Yes. So is the OP.
Did you bother to read the title?
Ask Slashdot: Best EEPROM Programmer For a Hobbyists?