Slashdot Mirror


User: Lunix+Nutcase

Lunix+Nutcase's activity in the archive.

Stories
0
Comments
4,847
First seen
Last seen
Profile
(view on slashdot.org)

Comments · 4,847

  1. Re:Gentle push + downward slope = joke on Robot Walks Like a Human, Requires No Power · · Score: 1

    Excerpt this isn't anything like that at all. Outside of possibly using more modern materials nothing they do is revolutionary or groundbreaking.

  2. Re:so what? on Robot Walks Like a Human, Requires No Power · · Score: 1

    You seem to be missing my point which is that the claims of the summary and the linked article are hugely hyperbolic. While this set of legs might be well-engineered this is neither groundbreaking nor does it walk with "no power". And how it has any relevance to "uncanny valley" is also a mystery.

  3. Re:My grandfather made one of these... on Robot Walks Like a Human, Requires No Power · · Score: 1

    It was made by scientists who noted what they did for the betterment of mankind.

    As did the scientists in the 1980s that did the exact same thing. Somewhat interesting to watch? Sure. Groundbreaking? Hardly.

  4. Re:Freakin' wow. on Robot Walks Like a Human, Requires No Power · · Score: 1

    Seriously what? Passive walkers have been around for nearly 3 decades.

  5. Re:so what? on Robot Walks Like a Human, Requires No Power · · Score: 1

    The idea is that, because it walks passively, you only need to pump in a little extra energy to make it keep walking.

    Sure as long as you never run out if downward slope but how realistic is that? Come back to me when this can passively walk up an incline.

  6. so what? on Robot Walks Like a Human, Requires No Power · · Score: -1

    Great. I've also built a self-propelled bike that requires no energy to run either. Did I mention it only works when riding on a downward incline?

  7. Re:Wikileaks done in by its own leak on Wikileaks Suspends Publishing Of Cables Due To "Financial Blockade" · · Score: 1

    WAAAAAAH! Someone broke our confidentiality agreement on information we were only able to obtain through someone else breaking a confidentiality agreement! Poor us!

  8. Re:Packet sniffing on Researchers ID Skype, BitTorrent Users · · Score: 2

    So your complaining that they are doing nothing different than every bittorrent client does?

  9. Re:Encryption? on Researchers ID Skype, BitTorrent Users · · Score: 1

    How is crawling a bittorrent swarm violating the dmca? You do realize that your IP address is publicly broadcasted, right?

  10. Re:Privacy on Researchers ID Skype, BitTorrent Users · · Score: 1

    Since when is your ip address assumed to private when you are publicly broadcasting it all the time?

  11. Re:Privacy on Researchers ID Skype, BitTorrent Users · · Score: 2

    An ip address you.publicly broadcast is personal information?

  12. Re:Privacy on Researchers ID Skype, BitTorrent Users · · Score: 1

    No they haven't. They've.only figured out the ip address. They aren't tapping the call.

  13. Re:Researchers? on Researchers ID Skype, BitTorrent Users · · Score: 1

    invade the reasonably expected privacy of Skype users and BT users?

    For Skype users you might have a point but bittorrent works by publicly broadcasting your IP to the swarm. That's like standing outside shouting your name and social security number and claiming you had an expectation of privacy.

  14. Re:Encryption? on Researchers ID Skype, BitTorrent Users · · Score: 1

    You are still broadcasting your ip even when using encryption. How else do you think you create connections to others in the swarm?

  15. Re:Packet sniffing on Researchers ID Skype, BitTorrent Users · · Score: 2

    People are actually unaware that they are broadcasting their ip address when on the internet? Really? Especially those using bittorrent that works through broadcasting yourself to the swarm.

  16. Re:Privacy on Researchers ID Skype, BitTorrent Users · · Score: 1

    What's illegal about it? What federal or state statute have they violated?

  17. Re:Federal Law State Law on Legal Tender? Maybe Not, Says Louisiana Law · · Score: 1

    Because you misunderstand what is debt and what isn't?

  18. Re:Federal Law State Law on Legal Tender? Maybe Not, Says Louisiana Law · · Score: 3, Informative

    They aren't. This is why it's perfectly legal to refuse cash when you sell something. But you must accept cash for loan payments and any other repayments of debt.

  19. Re:All debts, public and private on Legal Tender? Maybe Not, Says Louisiana Law · · Score: 1

    And they aren't banning using cash for debt payments. Upfront purchases are not debt payments. Hence why I can sell something and refuse to take cash. Now if I loan out money I can not refuse a cash payment.

  20. Re:For All Debts Public and Private on Legal Tender? Maybe Not, Says Louisiana Law · · Score: 1

    Great but what they are banning aren't debt payments. An upfront payment for a good or service is not servicing a debt.

  21. Re:Give me a large personal break! on Actress Sues IMDb For Revealing Her Age · · Score: 0

    Then she should sure the studio who denies her a job rather than going after imdb. Oh right, you actually bought into the phoney notion that this isn't just a frivolous money grab.

  22. Re:"So is her career dependent on lies?" on Actress Sues IMDb For Revealing Her Age · · Score: 1

    Except when you put it out in a public webpage?

  23. Re:A better investment for that $44B: Apple on Ballmer: We're Lucky Microsoft Didn't Buy Yahoo · · Score: 1

    Because it's been public knowledge since 2007? YW HTH.

  24. Re:8 bit audio? on Microtouch: 8-bit Open Source Media Device · · Score: 1

    No they didn't since the z80 doesn't.do the decoding. The dsp does.

  25. Re:Open-source alternative to the iPod Touch ? on Microtouch: 8-bit Open Source Media Device · · Score: 1

    Even still this thing doesn't even remotely match the features of an iPod touch. It can't even play mp3s. Let alone the fact that the.iPod touch has a much higher res screen, can play 720p video, can do opengl es 2.0, etc. To claim this is even remotely an iPod touch alternative is laughable.